HHEEEELLLLPPPP! PIX 515E 6.2: Inside Networks can only reach [7:69757]

2003-05-29 Thread Charles EEEE Riley
Hi, all, I have a problem that is making me scream and shout, gonna knock myself out. It has to do with my PIX firewall configuration. The long and short of my problem is that the inside network can only reach inside hosts and outside networks: it can not reach any host on on the DMZ, depsite th

PIX Firewall 6.2.2 Inside network can not reach DMZ hosts [7:69756]

2003-05-29 Thread Charles EEEE Riley
Hi, all, I have a problem that is making me scream and shout, gonna knock myself out. It has to do with my PIX firewall configuration. The long and short of my problem is that the inside network can only reach inside hosts and outside networks: it can not reach any host on on the DMZ, depsite th

Re: Dynamic Route Graphs...... [7:69738]

2003-05-29 Thread Tom Martin
Raj, Is the software going to be open source? I have a large collection of scripts for automating configuration (during rollouts) and basic troubleshooting. I've had intentions of providing a GUI front-end at some point, either in Java or PHP, but never seem to have the time to get around to

HHEEEELLLLPPPP! PIX 515E 6.2: Inside Networks can only reach [7:69759]

2003-05-29 Thread Charles EEEE Riley
Sorry if you get this twice or thrice...problem with outlook and dates... Hi, all, I have a problem that is making me scream and shout, gonna knock myself out. It has to do with my PIX firewall configuration. The long and short of my problem is that the inside network can only reach inside hosts

Re: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]

2003-05-29 Thread Tom Martin
Salvatore, ebg-multihop is not required for load balancing. It can be beneficial to use a loopback to peer from/to, similar to IPX internal networks provide better load balancing for NetWare servers. If you feel it's a good idea to peer to/from loopack interfaces (redundancy, better balancing

RE: Am I over my head guys? [7:69746]

2003-05-29 Thread Troy Leliard
I would definitely say go for it ... thre isn't much to "basic" or even intermediate LAN switching and IO am sure you will be able to cope. Just have confidence in yourself, and while you are getting used to the environment, just be very throughtful about each command you enter. I still often ope

RE: Dynamic Route Graphs...... [7:69738]

2003-05-29 Thread Troy Leliard
Looks ok to me, but as always .. I would look through the code first. Presumably it logs on to the router using standard vty / telnet. (does it require enable ?), I am alway wary of inputing these details into a 3rd party program unless I can proof read the code. Even then I would probably cre

RE: Am I over my head guys? [7:69746]

2003-05-29 Thread Andrew Larkins
To be at the CCNP level you must have already shown some skills with LANs - Support and switching exams. This sounds like it may be a good thing. If you have experience for 2 years as you say, then it should be OK. Maybe they can let you in on what they are doing on the LAN - VLANs, etc. Ever playe

Re: Am I over my head guys? [7:69746]

2003-05-29 Thread ian williams
go for it Deal with it heheheheh Your be fine Ian - Original Message - From: "B Rudy" To: Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 8:52 AM Subject: Am I over my head guys? [7:69746] > Hey guys, I just got an offer to become a 2nd senior network engineer for > this company in Orange Country.

RE: Am I over my head guys? [7:69746]

2003-05-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
personally, if you've got the offer, someone thinks you can do it. For my first networking position, I was deemed to be the cisco 'expert' as I had read a Cisco book on TCP/IP, but at that stage I hadn't even seen a router/switch! Look at it from the point of view, that you are going into an existi

RE: Am I over my head guys? [7:69746]

2003-05-29 Thread James Gosnold
I will be interested to see the answers of others to this too. My guess is many will tell you to 'go for it'. I'm in a similar position in that I am beginning to get the offer of interviews for senior(ish) roles and am a CCNP with minimal 'real' experience so am a little nervous about being 'found

RE: Am I over my head guys? [7:69746]

2003-05-29 Thread Mark Hayes
Man, you sound like me. I don't have a job offer though. Either you lack confidence or you know your own limitations. Odds are it's a confidence issue. Go for the job and enjoy it! Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 2:52 A

RE: Am I over my head guys? [7:69746]

2003-05-29 Thread Mwalie W
Hi, Go for it and do whatever it takes to succeed! If one goes only for the best, one finds it. Good Luck! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69749&t=69746 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.gr

Am I over my head guys? [7:69746]

2003-05-29 Thread B Rudy
Hey guys, I just got an offer to become a 2nd senior network engineer for this company in Orange Country. Great News i know!! Dilemma: I am a CCNP but have no local Area Nework Experience. Going to be workin with Catalyst 6500 switches. Also i have about 2 yrs working with cisco equipment, how

RE: RES: RES: Help with router config [7:69612]

2003-05-29 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Henrique Issamu Terada wrote: > > Karyn , > > Regarding this problem , for sure the other end must know how > to get back > the packets to your network where your host > muse is ( maybe 198.182.157.0). I agree. Since your end looks good, make sure the router at the other end has a route back.

RE: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-29 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Alas, those sys admins. I love your way of putting it. (They know how to right click things but not much more. ;-) The thing that gets me is that they are sure that they know networking. Thanks for a helpful story. Priscilla John Brandis wrote: > > I would like to tell you about a problem I had

RES: RES: Help with router config [7:69612]

2003-05-29 Thread Henrique Issamu Terada
Karyn , Regarding this problem , for sure the other end must know how to get back the packets to your network where your host muse is ( maybe 198.182.157.0). Regarding the other one , ask them to issue a trace form their router to the network 198.182.157.0 and to 192.168.1.2 . Ask for the resu

6509 Bus Architecture [7:69740]

2003-05-29 Thread Salvatore De Luca
Hi, I am inquiring about the internal physical bus layout on the 6509. I have Dual supes, w/ MSFC2's, running SRM HA, but my quesion relies specifically on slot 6 and slot 9. I am using CATOS 6.3.5 and MSFC IOS 12.1.(8). Do these 2 slots work on seperate or same BUSES? Basically do these slots

question on operational efficiency of vpn's [7:69739]

2003-05-29 Thread garrett allen
just finished an 8 city (3 u.s./5 e.u.) vpn deployment. we were in a bit of a rush and now that we have finished the initial deployment we have the luxury of time to think things through a little more clearly. one oversight that we made in our haste to deploy we just confirmed - the overhead

Dynamic Route Graphs...... [7:69738]

2003-05-29 Thread Raj Santiago
Hi All, A friend and myself have recently completed a program, in which “WE” think is going to be very helpful to all engineers out there. Basically it’s a network-graphing program. How does it work ? · logs on to all known routers in your network and issues “term len 0” and then “show ip route”.

ISDN Switch-type basic-ni [7:69737]

2003-05-29 Thread Fanglo MA
Hi, Just want to clarify for basic-ni is set on BRI, then if one dialer string set on remote site can bring up both channels? Anyone use this swith type at work please share your experience. Thank a lot. Regards, Fanglo _ Little minds are interested i

Re: BGP Load Balance [7:69611]

2003-05-29 Thread Salvatore De Luca
Understood.. but does the command "neigh x.x.x.x ebgp-multihop X" by itself provide load-balancing? I could be wrong.. but from my undrstanding this just states that you have the capability of peering with neigh that are not directly connected.. You could very well acheive loadbalancing when 2 EBG

Re: RES: Help with router config [7:69612]

2003-05-29 Thread Karyn Williams
More info. I can ping from the router, but not from other hosts on my network. muse% traceroute 192.168.0.1 (ip addr of my int) traceroute to 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 MSFC (198.182.157.253) 0.704 ms 0.445 ms 0.459 ms 2 CAIOA.calarts.edu (65.165.175.254) 7.5

RE: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-29 Thread John Brandis
I would like to tell you about a problem I had in relation to this. In November last year, I rolled out a new building for my current employer. We are not a huge company, but it was around 600 ports using 100% Cisco gear. The challenge was, that on thursday night, I took delivery of the gear. Frid

Re: RES: Help with router config [7:69612]

2003-05-29 Thread Karyn Williams
I can ping the interface at 192.168.0.2, but nothing beyond which is supposed to be the 10.120.4.0. I do not control the other side which just adds complexity. So how can I test that my side is working properly when only data to 10.120.4.0 is going out this interface ? Here's what a traceroute to

Re: 640-607 CCNP SUPPORT EXAM urgent [7:69565]

2003-05-29 Thread Diego Martínez Boqué
Hello Peter, and yes I took the support exam recently and it did not contain any question about appletalk, this was my case and the CIT course includes some appletalk topics so I was looking forward to see some questions about it, but nop, not a single question about appletalk in my exam. By the w

Re: Virtual Link Problem [7:69640]

2003-05-29 Thread Kevin Love
Tom, Congratulations, it appears that you hit the nail right on the head. Router ID was not an issue - I just failed to show you the loopback interfaces. The issue was apparently network type. As soon as I hard-set R2s network type to point-to-multipoint (it was, as you correctly pointed out, n

Re: Virtual Link Problem [7:69640]

2003-05-29 Thread Scott
Check your network types on the connections between r2 and r5 and r2 and r6. Cheers, Scott ""Kevin Love"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > R2#sh ip ospf int > Serial1.256 is up, line protocol is up > Internet Address 172.16.56.2/29, Area 1 > Process ID 1, Router ID 192.168.2.2, Net

RES: Help with router config [7:69612]

2003-05-29 Thread Henrique Issamu Terada
Actually , this /32 route is correct . It is default, when you have a PPP link . In order to disable it, you'll need to do a no peer neighbor-route , under interface config . Interface seems to be up , IPCP as well . Do you have any connectivity problem , besides this "fake" route problem ? >

Re: new ccnp exams [7:69621]

2003-05-29 Thread Weaselboy
I believe there was an extensive conversation within the group in the last few months that the difference wasn't so much with what topics being covered, but rather that the level of difficulty was ratcheted up. Priscilla was a major contributer to the conversation, so you know it will have signific

Re: Packet retransmit questiion [7:69715]

2003-05-29 Thread Tom Martin
First of all, I wouldn't post a question advertising it to be from the 350-001 test to a public newsgroup. It just seems like a bad idea. I'm responding to the question based on the fact that I took the test a couple weeks ago and didn't see the question. I'm HOPING that the question is from

Re: Packet retransmit questiion [7:69715]

2003-05-29 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 6:46 PM + 5/28/03, Robert Perez wrote: >Hi all, > >I have a question on the CCIE 350-001 test. I have heard differing opinions >on this but when traffic crosses a WAN connection and there are problems who >does the retransmit?? Host or RTR?? > >1.) In Frame relay there is a line hit or corr

Re: HELP!! PIX-PIX VPN config problem [7:69684]

2003-05-29 Thread Paul McLaren
Hi, Can you post your two configs (remove private info if required)? Regards Paul ""Mary Kvitashvili"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Trying to config PIX 506 to PIX 515 for basic VPN/IPSEC/LAN/LAN > connectivity. Took the configs straight off the Cisco site but I cannot > establ

Re: Virtual Link Problem [7:69640]

2003-05-29 Thread Tom Martin
Kevin, It might just be an oversight, but R5 and R6 don't seem to have a loopback or explicit router ID defined. Also, what is the OSPF network type on R2? It's set manually on R5 and R6, but left to the default on R2. I believe (but haven't verified) the default would be non-broadcast not p

RE: Anyone written CSI 9E0-131 Cisco Safe? [7:69520]

2003-05-29 Thread John Smith
I playing with the CSI (1.0) lab on the cisco partners site, nice little lab, hopefully it will help solidify my cmds if there are any sims on the actual exam. Glad to hear you passed. Way to go... Andrew Larkins wrote: -Original Message- From: Andrew Larkins Sent: 28 May 2003 11:18 To

RE: circuit restriction??? [7:69716]

2003-05-29 Thread Warner, Lance
It looks like this will be pretty simple via PBR. I'll give it a shot. thanks to everyone who replied. Lance -Original Message- From: Warner, Lance Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 9:30 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: circuit restriction??? Is it possible to force packets to leave o

RES: circuit restriction??? [7:69692]

2003-05-29 Thread Henrique Issamu Terada
Maybe policy-based route , matching the address of your server and setting outgoing interface/next hop ? > _ > Henrique Issamu Terada, CCIE # 7460 > IT Support - Open Network > CPM S.A. - Tecnologia criando valor > Tel.: 55 11 4196-0710 > Fax: 55 11 4196-090

Packet retransmit questiion [7:69715]

2003-05-29 Thread Robert Perez
Hi all, I have a question on the CCIE 350-001 test. I have heard differing opinions on this but when traffic crosses a WAN connection and there are problems who does the retransmit?? Host or RTR?? 1.) In Frame relay there is a line hit or corrupt packet on the WAn, who retransmits, should be the

Re: default-information originate with route-map [7:69558]

2003-05-29 Thread Tom Martin
Maroun, OSPF routers don't really send out routes to their neighbors, they send LSAs. For most things you can think of them as being the same, except in situations like yours. Your router is presumably creating the default route (use 'show ip ospf database' to verify) and therefore creating t

Re: Multicast server [7:69686]

2003-05-29 Thread jeff sicuranza
I recall on the web there is a shareware tool called MCASTER. Do a google search on it. I use it and it is quick and great. You can alos use th IOS MRM commands to generate S,Gs... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69711&t=69686 -

Re: Free trial access to CCIE equipment [7:69677]

2003-05-29 Thread testlab
Hi Shawn, Thanks for your feedback. I was planning to set up a proper web site and then submit to search engines but thought I'd stick it out on a couple of newsgroups to what response I would get. I've checked out other labs and I would rather price it low and have it used all of the time than no

RE: CCNP Sw question [7:69683]

2003-05-29 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G
I don't believe that ISL requires identical native VLANs at each end of a trunk, however, 802.1Q does (if I'm wrong, someone please correct me). The trunk negotiation parameter at each end of the link does not have to be identical because there can be different negotiation combinations that each po

Re: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-29 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
ian williams wrote: > > This has come up in the ccie written. A question that asks whether you should use auto or manual is really on the CCIE written? Of course, you can't answer that under NDA ;-), but I agree with John that it would be a bad question. It's implementation dependent, with change

Re: VPN 3000 concentrator question [7:69676]

2003-05-29 Thread Robert Edmonds
To the first part of your question, yes, that is it basically. If you are using the Cisco VPN client, you will enter the group name and password under the "Authentication" tab. You can also use the VPN client that is built into Windows, in which case you do not need the group name and password, b

Re: New BCRAN topics - Cable Modems and DSL [7:69291]

2003-05-29 Thread Weaselboy
Thank you Dave and Kok - I appreciate your letting me know... On Sun, 2003-05-25 at 19:29, Dave Jacoby wrote: > Me neither. > > Dave > > ""Kok Onn Lim"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can forget about the two topic. I've done the exam, but didn't face > any > > question on

Re: OSPF over FR [7:69527]

2003-05-29 Thread Nakul Malik
study sam halabi - ospf design guide -N ""ericbrouwers"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Rivalino, > > Here are five examples I made when studying BSCI. I used a/o following > books: > - the Sybex BSCI book, > - Cisco Press Routing Cert. Guide, > - CCO IOS IP Configuration Guide, > - TA

RE: want to know???? [7:69695]

2003-05-29 Thread who jack
Hi vijay Can u plz tell me abt ur background. I am asking this because, I think CCIE exam requires an extensive amount of practical experience rather thatn classroom knowledge. I am preparing for CCNP and do not like to pay higher classroom pricess. It is better to purchase the equipment than pay

want to know???? [7:69695]

2003-05-29 Thread Vijay Anand
i am going to take my ccie R&S lab on Aug 31 in b'lore,,so i am pratic;ing with five 25xx routers and live ISDN connection,,i did my ccie lab all in one guid(hutnik).. i want to know whatz all senarios ,,,what all i want to do??? and is dlsw and MPLS is there in now a days ccie lab examm,,,pls giv

RES: CCNP Sw question [7:69683]

2003-05-29 Thread Henrique Issamu Terada
Roseli, For sure, native vlans need to match , no matter SW revision, product, vendor , whatever . If not , imagine vlan 2 native in side A and 3 in side B . SIde A won't tag vlan 2 frames, and side B won't tag vlan 3 frames . Trunk will come up, but both vlans won't work properly . Regardi

Re: new ccnp exams [7:69621]

2003-05-29 Thread who jack
I have been to the above links, but i m still not satisfied with the replies. I am preparing for the routing exam, in the last release it was titled as building scalable cisco internetworks. The objectives of these exams are identical. so whats new in here the exam numbers. The only difference i ca

RE: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-29 Thread Larry Letterman
I agree with dave 100%...our default on the campus is auto/auto... Larry Letterman Cisco Systems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MADMAN Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 8:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: port/duplex configs [7:695

RE: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-29 Thread Bob McWhorter
I have long been a hard coder of duplex and speed especially with Sun's and various other equipment. Recently working with Wi-lan (U3) and Proxim (AP2500) wireless gear changed my mind. Lab testing with a Cisco 3550 resulted in the Proxim only working with 10/half or auto/auto. Anything else pro

Re: Cables [7:69625]

2003-05-29 Thread Nakul Malik
no, ur solution is to get a cable for the 4000 with a v35 connector and one for the 2500 with a v35 connector of, if you are good with a soldering iron, buy/steal some connectors, take a printout of the pinouts and spend an afternoon on ur workbench -N ""H"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Multicast server [7:69686]

2003-05-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Real.com has a free 25 user server. Also Microsoft offers a free server so does Apple. Nabil "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education."

Re: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-29 Thread John Neiberger
I don't have enough time at the moment to explain this as well as I should. Do a quick search on autonegotiation in the archives and I have some recent postings that explain it better. here's the short version: The only connection method specific in the FastEthernet standard is AUTO. If you do a

Re: Recall: Anyone written CSI 9E0-131 Cisco Safe? [7:69520]

2003-05-29 Thread NKP
I have cleared it today in the morning , in my second attempt . I got 924 out of the required 82 percent for passing Don't underestimate the test , there are questions most of which are from the SAFE whitepaper of SMR , go through the book of MCNS as well and know all aspects of security design .

circuit restriction??? [7:69692]

2003-05-29 Thread Warner, Lance
Is it possible to force packets to leave out the same interface they came in on? Explanation - I want to add another server on the DMZ but restrict all of it's access to a specific T1 (don't want it using the bandwidth of the regular internet CKT). So I was thinking that maybe there was a way t

RE: Free trial access to CCIE equipment [7:69677]

2003-05-29 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G
There are good and bad points about this. It's always good to have multiple lab vendors to choose from and I'm sure that people would be interested. HOWEVER, the certification market is saturated with labs like yours and with study materials, etc. It is very difficult to break into this business w

Re: port/duplex configs [7:69582]

2003-05-29 Thread MADMAN
ian williams wrote: > This has come up in the ccie written. > If I understand this subject correctly AUTO , sends out packets to try and > match the 2 devices up with regards to speed and duplex. > If your getting connection problems this would be a speed issue. If its some > sort of packet loss/er

Re: Virtual Link Problem [7:69640]

2003-05-29 Thread Kevin Love
R2#sh ip ospf int Serial1.256 is up, line protocol is up Internet Address 172.16.56.2/29, Area 1 Process ID 1, Router ID 192.168.2.2, Network Type NON_BROADCAST, Cost: 64 Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DR, Priority 255 Designated Router (ID) 192.168.2.2, Interface address 172.16.56.2 Back

Multicast server [7:69686]

2003-05-29 Thread ian williams
Has anyone got any Multicast server software for windows NT I would like to get some multicast traffic working on my testlab thanks Ian Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=69686&t=69686 -- FAQ, list archives, and s

HELP!! PIX-PIX VPN config problem [7:69685]

2003-05-29 Thread Mary Kvitashvili
Trying to config PIX 506 to PIX 515 for basic VPN/IPSEC/LAN/LAN connectivity. Took the configs straight off the Cisco site but I cannot establish my tunnel at the ISAKMP level. Trying to ping from LAN to LAN. Getting the following error message from "debug crypto isakmp": HQ-PIX# ISAKMP (0): be

CCNP Sw question [7:69683]

2003-05-29 Thread rose mesq
I would like to know, if when you are using an Ethernet Media Trunk line operating with ISL mode between two Cisco SWs, with same identical modules, software revisions and VLANs configurations, you need to configure identical native VLANs and identical Trunk negotiation parameters at each end of th

HELP!! PIX-PIX VPN config problem [7:69684]

2003-05-29 Thread Mary Kvitashvili
Trying to config PIX 506 to PIX 515 for basic VPN/IPSEC/LAN/LAN connectivity. Took the configs straight off the Cisco site but I cannot establish my tunnel at the ISAKMP level. Trying to ping from LAN to LAN. Getting the following error message from "debug crypto isakmp": HQ-PIX# ISAKMP (0): be

RE: Cables [7:69625]

2003-05-29 Thread Daniel Cotts
NP-2T uses a large 50-pin connector. It is quite different from the 60 pin that exists on 2500s. Part number on a V.35 DTE cable is CAB-NPV35TV2= aka 72-0671-02 One solution would be to mate this with a CAB-V35FC= aka 72-0792-01 (which is a DCE cable and fits your 2500s) You end up with a 20 foot l

Re: Virtual Link Problem [7:69640]

2003-05-29 Thread NetChild
Hi Kevin, can you set the default values for ospf hello interval. can you post the result of "show ip ospf int" and "show ip ospf data" from all the three routers. NetChild, ""Kevin Love"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hey Team, > > I cannot figure this out. I've configured lots of

Re: Urgent Help Needed [7:69669]

2003-05-29 Thread Peter van Oene
At 12:02 PM 5/28/2003 +, Rohit Sundriyal wrote: >Hi All > >I am facing very Strange Problem .My lan is behind Pix and for the last few >weeks i am receiving some popup messages on my lan pc from internet even >thought i am not browsing any site.Can anybudy tell how to block this kinda >messages

RE: ws-x5530 [7:69624]

2003-05-29 Thread Daniel Cotts
Have you ever had access to the card? 5530 is a SUP III. Console for it uses a straight Cat5 cable rather than the rolled Cisco console cable. > -Original Message- > From: John Brandis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 8:37 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: ws-x55

Free trial access to CCIE equipment [7:69677]

2003-05-29 Thread testlab
Hello there, I've set up a pod of equipment that can be accessed from the Internet. I'm hoping to get some feedback on how usable it is and if there is a market for selling access to this sort of stuff. I've spent a fair bit of money and time setting it up. I've done the CCIE stuff so have some em

RE: CCIE [7:69631]

2003-05-29 Thread alaerte Vidali
Try "The One" book. Sorry. Could avoid that. Unfortunately (or fortunately) there is no 'one' book. It is really necessary ready the BluePrint and develop your skills (there are questions that requires a knowledge one gets with practice). After this it would be helpful test your level with Bos

Re: Two ISDN BRI interfaces back to back [7:69540]

2003-05-29 Thread Scott Nelson
Try this: ( if it works, credit given to author below ) Scotty Enter this under stupid router tricks (it's got to be more expensive than an ISDN emulator, but not if you've got the parts lying around). Switch: Cisco 2600 or 3600 with NM-2V

Re: default-information originate with route-map [7:69558]

2003-05-29 Thread Maroun Waked
Hi, thanks for your reply, actually I have a default route in the router. I tried with a default route poiting to an IP address, and tried matching on this address in the route-map. But no success, I even tried with a permit any access-list but also no success. Then I removed the first default r

VPN 3000 concentrator question [7:69676]

2003-05-29 Thread Richard Campbell
Hi.. I am new to this VPN 3000 concentrator. I want to ask if I have a VPN 3000 concentrator device in NY. Can I connect my VPN client in London to it? What info do I need? Just the external IP of the VPN server and VPN client group name + password? Is the VPN client free for download? Wh