As multiple single entries - you can not summarize these...
A better way is to have all the specific users that must be denied to be in
a summarizable subnet
-Original Message-
From: Yong Wee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 September 2003 17:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: question
Try an access-list that denies ICMP and then use IP accounting access-
violations to see - more than likely a virus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ethernet bogs down help
Clients will point to the HSRP address as their default gw
-Original Message-
From: Marko Milivojevic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 September 2003 13:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HSRP [7:74879]
In the case above, is the client gateway going to be 10.254.0.1 (IP
Address
This is normal for a backup interface. If you want the ISDN to show active
as well you need to configure dialer interfaces and place them in backup
mode
-Original Message-
From: kaiser anwar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 September 2003 23:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: backup
You also need this command:
sysopt connection permit-pptp
This is my working config:
vpdn group 1 accept dialin pptp
vpdn group 1 ppp authentication mschap
vpdn group 1 ppp encryption mppe auto
vpdn group 1 client configuration address local pptp
vpdn group 1 client configuration dns ProxySvr
The new IOS is heavy on DRAM - the only way to solve this would be to
upgrade the DRAM memory in the box or have a smaller feature set code. It is
very important to read the memory requirements before uploading the code.
Newer images can use up to 64MB and greater of DRAM
Andrew
-Original
type ip subnet-zero and that solves the problem
-Original Message-
From: Reimer, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 August 2003 17:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Bad mask /24 for address [7:73801]
That's a zero subnet, there are no 1 bits in the subnet. Subnet bits are
Hi,
From what I read on CCO regarding this cert is as follows:
1. Your CSS1 is valid for 2 years from the date you got it.
2. You have until 30 Sept 2003 to covert to CCSP otherwise when your CSS1
expires (in 2 years) you have to rewrite all the exams again.
3. 9E0-131 is the exam to do before
Please send the config and we can have a look.
-Original Message-
From: Tunde Kalejaiye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 July 2003 11:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX DNS Issue [7:72685]
I swapped a router running ios firewall with a pix 506e and i have been
having
all sorts of
those commands are only there after you enable aaa new model.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 July 2003 18:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco catalyst 3548 and Radius [7:71991]
Hi all,
I am configuring Radius on a cat 3548 and I do not have
Hi all,
I just received an email from Cisco regarding this cert that I have
apparently qualified for. Does anyone have any information around this? From
what I can see from the exam tracking system, my CSS1 exams qualified me for
this.
Regards
Andrew Larkins
BCom, CCNP, CCDP, CSS1
Bytes
you need to configure dialer watch for this to work correctly.
-Original Message-
From: Salvatore De Luca [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 June 2003 09:42
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FR Backup Over ISDN [7:71332]
Breif example... Your local T1 ciruit to your carrier is Up Up
Use a floating static route with a higher metric - around 200 etc
-Original Message-
From: Julian.P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: isdn backup query [7:70443]
Hi all
I just have a query about configuring an isdn backup
from what I know - the licence is per router
-Original Message-
From: Julian.P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 June 2003 10:47
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ipsec question [7:70180]
Hi guys
If i have say downloaded 12.2 ios with ipsec 56 from another router can i
use it in a
as well as debu ppp multilink
-Original Message-
From: Dom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 June 2003 13:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BRI [7:70059]
Show isdn status then use debug isdn q921 for more detailed information.
Best regards,
Dom Stocqueler
CTO - SysDom
from what I remember about this, they will try each policy until a match is
amde, otherwise the connection terminates
-Original Message-
From: Richard Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 June 2003 10:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: multiple isakmp policies question [7:69977]
To be at the CCNP level you must have already shown some skills with LANs -
Support and switching exams.
This sounds like it may be a good thing. If you have experience for 2 years
as you say, then it should be OK. Maybe they can let you in on what they are
doing on the LAN - VLANs, etc. Ever
Andrew Larkins would like to recall the message, Anyone written CSI 9E0-131
Cisco Safe? [7:69520].
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69657t=69520
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Larkins
Sent: 28 May 2003 11:18
To: Andrew Larkins
Subject: RE: Anyone written CSI 9E0-131 Cisco Safe? [7:69520]
Not sure what I was thinking here when I sent think - Speed reading is not
always good!! - I got 800 last time
-Original Message
I got 880 last time and failed. I need to re-sit this one again soon, but
have been too busy lately
-Original Message-
From: Marcin Strzyzewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 May 2003 09:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone written CSI 9E0-131 Cisco Safe? [7:69520]
NKP
it NAT
first, or check the outgoing access list ??
Thanks in advance
Andrew Larkins
BCom, CCNP, CCDP, CSS1
Bytes Technology Networks
A Division of Bytes Technology Group : Registration No: 1911/003874/06
A Member of the Altron Group
P O Box 748, Rivonia, 2128
3 Eglin Rd, The Crescent, Sunninghill
I noticed the same thing. From my understanding it works great but the
problem comes in when the second link is connected. Once that is done, only
then do the problems start. Something to do with the capabilities on the WIC
itself.
Regards
Andrew
CCNP, CCDP, CSS1
-Original Message-
Done some more digging here and found the following:
1. Incoming access-list
2. NAT
3. Outgoing access-list
4. CBAC
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 April 2003 10:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Order of packet processing on an interface
The combination of both can be done without any issues. I would keep 1 IP
from the assigned range for the PAT address and have the others as 1 - 1
translations.
Andrew
CCNP, CCDP, CSS1
-Original Message-
From: ciscoGo2002 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 April 2003 12:58
To: [EMAIL
I agree - more than likely an IOS bug
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 March 2003 17:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: 1720 crashing every week [7:66080]
Yesterday, Dave asked some questions of you that would help pinpoint your
trouble. Best
.
Anyhow - I think I will write in another 2-3 weeks. Some more preparation to
go.
Not quite CCSP yet - Andrew
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 02:54:33PM +, Andrew Larkins wrote:
Hi all,
I am sitting my Cisco SAFE Implementation Exam tomorrow morning at 10am.
Any
one with some last minute pointers
the one exam combines all the others that are part of the current track. I
would review all the stuff you did before and brush up on any of the newer
items in the exam description etc from CCO
Good luck - mine is up for renewal next year May
-Original Message-
From: Reza [mailto:[EMAIL
Hi all,
I am sitting my Cisco SAFE Implementation Exam tomorrow morning at 10am. Any
one with some last minute pointers??
Hopefully my CSS1 with be converted to a CCSP tomorrow!
Just before the salary review on Monday with the boss - so the pressure is
on
Andrew Larkins
BCom, CCNP, CCDP, CSS1
I had a similar issue here with a 6509 SUP 2.
My problem was fixed by using the button next to the console port. No idea
why I had to, but after pressing in in and then out again I could work fine.
Appart from that the only other thing was to reboot that chassis
You have done all of that, so I am
congrats!.
I have just over a year left for mine!
-Original Message-
From: Vicuna, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 March 2003 04:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Survived CCDP recertification! [7:65115]
good stuff Priscilla :-)
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla
I have as yet not read this book due to finishing other studies, but will
definitely do so soon - for my CCIE (refresher in case I have become stale)
to come one day when I get the office hours workload down and time off in
the evenings to focus on something other than work. Problem is now that my
I would use another TFTP program. I started off using the Cisco TFTP server
and then started running into large problems when upgrading 3660's. Timeouts
and errors etc. I changed to use pumpkin (freeware) and things have never
been better. The same copy that failed previously works great done
You will need to recertify entirely from CCNA again.
My CCNP is up for recert next year May - recert of go for CCIE??
Otherwise I lose my CCNP, CCDP, CSS1
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Pittwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 February 2003 16:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
please send the rest of the config so we can have a look.
-Original Message-
From: Cisco Nuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2003 16:31
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cannot ping ospf routes from a rip router? [7:63864]
Hello, I have 3 routers setup, running ospf and rip
the first access-list will not work.
The second one will also deny networks 192.17.72.0 and 78.0 as well as 79.0
-
You are correct about zeros must make at 1's are don't care, but you need to
understand the basic of subnetting. A 248.0 subnet mask means 8 Class C
subnets. You have to start at a
First thing I would do is verify duplex and speed settings and hardcode them
for servers. The move the server to another port to see if the problem is
still there. If it is, then the switch is ruled out and you need to look at
the cabling and NIC
-Original Message-
From: Ken Diliberto
I would use the diff serve bit to modify the packet header to give class A
traffic a higher priority. That way, that packet gets sent first from the
output queue.
-Original Message-
From: ira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 February 2003 19:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: QoS
I have a similar site with the same bootstrap version as below as the memory
upgrade worked great.
Thanks for the input - I actually forgot to check that.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 February 2003 18:18
To: 'Andrew Larkins'; [EMAIL
Don't you have to running the Enterprise version of the software for VTP to
work??
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 February 2003 21:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: two 1900 catalyst switches cannot exchange VLAN in
[7:63613]
am just about to RMA the chassis.
Thanks
Andrew Larkins
BCom, CCNP, CCDP, CSS1
Bytes Technology Networks
A Division of Bytes Technology Group : Registration No: 1911/003874/06
A Member of the Altron Group
P O Box 748, Rivonia, 2128
3 Eglin Rd, The Crescent, Sunninghill, South Africa
Tel
do a clear frame inarp
-Original Message-
From: Mung Go [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 February 2003 23:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Deleted PVC still works [7:63055]
Try clear frame-relay map, or clear frame-relay pvc, etc
Message Posted at:
This means that someone changed the rsa key on the PIX and that is only
became active after the reboot.
Verify with your guys that they changed nothing - otherwise it could be a
sort of attack
-Original Message-
From: Jens von B|low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 February 2003 12:41
you set it up originally (There are 2 key type - general and special) if
you never specified this, then a general key is created.
let us know how it goes
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Jens von B|low [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 February 2003 14:06
To: Andrew Larkins; [EMAIL
break during a power cycle?
Regards
Jens
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 February 2003 02:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ssh - warning: remote host identification has changed [7:62747]
The RSA key pair is generated when you want
yes -we have done it on the 6509 and all is great. What exactly are you
after??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 February 2003 15:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Content Switch Module and Server Load Balancing [7:62443]
Any Thoughts?
WCCP is for web caching - it is used in conjunction with a Cisco content
engine to pass all HTTP requests (an others) to a cache engine without the
users physically having a proxy configured
-Original Message-
From: Keyur Lavingia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 05 February 2003 16:15
do a show environment all
That will show you the cuurent load on the power supplies, then you can
decide
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 January 2003 15:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 6509-6513 power-supplies [7:62020]
Guys,
can you
the routers send hellp packets using a multicast address - check that this
is not being blocked somewhere.
-Original Message-
From: . [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 January 2003 22:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HSRP PROBLEM [7:62057]
HSRP PROBLEM
x.x.x.36 and x.x.x.37 are two
I wrote 9E0-572 - that exam is not on the retired exams list so I had the
book and thought what the hell!
-Original Message-
From: Kim Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 January 2003 19:22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Passed CSIDS 855/1000 [7:61655]
Congrats as well. I
the command is ip access-group #
Then it will work
-Original Message-
From: Tunji Suleiman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 January 2003 12:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: No Access-group on 7200 Eth/Fa Interfaces [7:61764]
Hello,
Can someone pls tell me why I wont have the
Use the command below:
global (outside) 1 interface
-Original Message-
From: Richard Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 1:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: can't use outside inf IP as PAT global IP [7:61755]
Hi.. I want to ask why I can't use outside
Hi all,
Just passed the last exam for CSS1. Now I have the SAFE exam to go to
upgrade to CCSP.
This was the hardest exam of all out of all the ones I have written so far -
CCNA/DA/NP/DP. Pass mark is 800 / 1000.
All I can say is study hard!!! Hands on will definitely help!!
Andrew Larkins
I had the same issue with another client.
The answer was 2 fold. There is a bug that is fixed on ver 6.2.2(100)
available from TAC - relates to PAT and FTP. Our particular problem was a
cache engine that proxied the connection so the PIX dropped it - found this
out from a packet sniff. For
a script would be the only option as far as I can tell here. NO export
ability as far as I know
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Gabriele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 January 2003 12:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NAT translation table [7:61553]
hi!
Does anyone knows if it's
www.ethereal.com
This is much small than Network Associates sniffer and is freeware. Not
resource intensive on the laptop.
-Original Message-
From: Peri Sophos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 January 2003 15:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sniffer software: [7:61566]
Hi all ,
I
I would agree that MCNS should be done first. All others build on this one.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Gunjan Mathur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 January 2003 13:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PIX Exam...(CSPFA) [7:61293]
I worked on Checkpoint and have some idea of
The file systems must be different then. I am sure they are - as far as I
can remember.
-Original Message-
From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 January 2003 16:33
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Loading IOS [7:61413]
I went in the lab and it didn't work. I pulled a
What exactly are you after - ICMP and telnet are very different!!
-Original Message-
From: Johan Bornman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 January 2003 15:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ICMP Traffic [7:61453]
How do I prioritize ICMP (Telnet) traffic on a 1601, no routing protocol
not bad!!
Put a smile on for the first time today!!
-Original Message-
From: Barbee Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 January 2003 16:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: O/T Funny Network Song [7:61454]
I haven't seen this posted here yet, sorry if I missed it in recent threads.
You will need to QoS on both sides of the link. Your side should be fine,
but good luck with the ISP side.
I would use the diffserve bits as well as bandwidth allocation using policy
maps.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Julian P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 January 2003 10:02
To:
In QoS now, there is more than just setting the bandwidth allocated to each
class. What you need to do is combine this with the diffserv bit. This is
basically the newer version of the TOS bit in the IP header that defines
what sort of service happens to the packet. In a nut shell, this means
Policy based routing is the answer - use route-maps and access control
lists. That should be everything you need
Andrew
Hi,
I have one router cisco 7200, and two conexions to the other two routers.
Conexion a: point-to-point
Conexion b: ATM
I want that one pc to the lan of 7200 route to
Good luck!!!
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Have I got a good one!
Just got through reading an RFP for a large organization. Over 30 sites,
12,000 ports, and 2000 phones. Complete rebuild of the network LAN and WAN
infrastructure. Add
I know that there was a utility a long time ago (in a galaxy far far away!!)
for Nortel / Bay that worked great with win 95. Who still uses that :)
-Original Message-
From: Larkin, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 January 2003 02:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Loading
Report the link to your Telco.
-Original Message-
From: Curious [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 January 2003 21:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Serial Interface Down [7:61220]
We just noticed the Serial Interface of our CIsco 2600 router is down,
here is its current status
Many thanks to all that responded.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Frank Jimenez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 January 2003 18:36
To: 'Andrew Larkins'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cat6500 PSU interoperability [7:60949]
Yes and no.
In combined mode they may be different
I currently only have IDS (9E0-572) to go and am booked for next week
Thursday at 10am and then I am CSS1 - apparently still valid until end Feb
2003. I will write the SAFE exam my early Feb 2003. Then I should be CCSP.
After that a short break and then onto CCIE - somehow I think with the kid
on
MCNS exam though). What all topics to be prepared on CSPM and IDS module for
sure I feel wud be tested a lot but other than that will there be any?
How much is the pass mark?
Any info is apprecitated,
Thanks.
Murali
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Larkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Only reason for the earlier exam from my side was the book we had. And also
to get me off my butt - sometimes I can be a little lazy!!.
At least with a deadline, I have to write!!
-Original Message-
From: Kim Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January 2003 19:36
To: [EMAIL
Thats relative to what you want to see and also depends on the volume of
traffic passing.
You could choose level 7 and then turn off some messages on the PIX and
revise later.
-Original Message-
From: Azhar Teza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 January 2003 20:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
The cat 6500 power supplies - 1300W and 2500W.
Can these 2 types be mixed in the same chassis or must they be the same
type?
Andrew Larkins
BCom, CCNP, CCDP
Bytes Technology Networks
A Division of the Bytes Technology Group
A Member of the Altron Group
www.btgroup.co.za
visit the press
Your interesting traffic needs to deny ospf
-Original Message-
From: neil K. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 January 2003 19:25
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OSPF DEMAND-CIRCUIT, not stopping the link UPDOWN [7:60719]
Guys,
The ISDN back between two of my routers keeps on
Hi,
I am writing IDS on the 23rd and will be doing this exam shortly there
after. From what I can see here from the outline on CCO, the exam seems to
just cover the SMR whitepaper.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Zeke Gibson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 January 2003 04:51
To:
some routers you can use a show controller serial x and see the clocks
detected
-Original Message-
From: Marakalas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 January 2003 13:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Checking clocking speed on routers [7:60591]
Hi All,
How does one check the clocking
Take a look at the NIC attached to that port - my guess is it is toast -
could also be the LAN cable. To rule out the switch port, move the
connection to another port and see if the symptoms are the same
-Original Message-
From: Lupi, Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 December 2002
Maybe a dumb question - but is there a certain software version for that
command (object group) - haven't seen it before
-Original Message-
From: Kevin O'Gilvie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 December 2002 22:15
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Resricicting Certain Users -Pix 515
First I would verify the TACACS+ host and key are valid - then debug TACACS
and see what you get there.
-Original Message-
From: Hamed Sedighi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 December 2002 15:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Error report from my Router [7:58882]
Hi,
I have a Cisco
Use route maps - that should work
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 December 2002 17:51
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Is there a redirect traffic command in IOS ? [7:58887]
HI,
Can I set up a redirect traffice command in my Cisco
2600 ? I
You could also use a TACACS+ server here and have authentication configured
for those users for any HTTP request - all others should be allowed to
access the web without authentication. This way you can track them etc and
setup specific access on the TACACS+ server.
Never used Websense some I
Hi all,
Just finished the exam above and scored 954/1000.
Just IDS and this new SAFE exam to go..
Anyone have pointers for the IDS??
Thanks
Andrew Larkins
BCom, CCNP, CCDP
Bytes Technology Networks
A Division of the Bytes Technology Group
A Member of the Altron Group
www.btgroup.co.za
visit
Hi all,
I have been looking through the cert requirements and I see that there is a
choice of 2 exams for IDS. The old one is 9E0-572 and the new one is
9E0-100.
Question is:
Is the old one marked for retirement and if so when. It looks as though I
can only write this in the new year as the
Hi all,
I am busy with my CCSP cert and this will be exam number 3 of 5.
Anyone else on the same track here and any pointers appreciated.
Thanks
Andrew
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58602t=58602
--
FAQ, list
I have just been having an argument about this with some colleagues. Nice to
know that I was right. I had to prove this to them on a working environment
before they would believe this.
Thanks!
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04
Andrew Larkins
BCom, CCNP, CCDP
Bytes Technology Networks
A Division of the Bytes Technology Group
A Member of the Altron Group
www.btgroup.co.za
visit the press office @ www.itweb.co.za/office/bytes
Tel : +27 11 800 9336
Fax : +27 11 800 9496
Mobile : +27 83 656 7214
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED
Andrew Larkins
BCom, CCNP, CCDP
Bytes Technology Networks
A Division of the Bytes Technology Group
A Member of the Altron Group
www.btgroup.co.za
visit the press office @ www.itweb.co.za/office/bytes
Tel : +27 11 800 9336
Fax : +27 11 800 9496
Mobile : +27 83 656 7214
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi all,
I haven't received any message for over 2 weeks now. Is there anything wrong
here??
Andrew Larkins
BCom, CCNP, CCDP
Bytes Technology Networks
A Division of the Bytes Technology Group
A Member of the Altron Group
www.btgroup.co.za
visit the press office @ www.itweb.co.za/office/bytes
this??
Andrew Larkins
BCom, CCNP, CCDP
Bytes Technology Networks
A Division of the Bytes Technology Group
A Member of the Altron Group
www.btgroup.co.za
visit the press office @ www.itweb.co.za/office/bytes
Tel : +27 11 800 9336
Fax : +27 11 800 9496
Mobile : +27 83 656 7214
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED
I had a similar issue on a NM-4A/S module. A case logged with TAC and they
said the module was faulty. I got it replaced
-Original Message-
From: Robert L. DeWees [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 September 2002 07:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Incorrect cable type [7:53838]
I
!!
Regards
Andrew Larkins
BCom, CCNP, CCDP
Bytes Technology Networks
A Division of the Bytes Technology Group
A Member of the Altron Group
www.btgroup.co.za
visit the press office @ www.itweb.co.za/office/bytes
Tel : +27 11 800 9336
Fax : +27 11 800 9496
Mobile : +27 83 656 7214
Email : [EMAIL
Hi all,
I have a 2950-24 switch that I have set-up monitoring (spanning) on. This is
not a problem.
The particular port that is the destination goes into and up
down(monitor) state when the commands are enter. This is normal I assume.
The local server get the necessary port information from
I have just upgraded a PIX 515 to 6.2.1 from 6.1
There was a problem in that the image stopped after 5 secs. I had to erase
the flash and the reload the new image and she worked great.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Loken, Bjorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17 September 2002 16:09
12.1 is not a good revision. I have had no issues with 12.2.7c as yet
-Original Message-
From: Erick B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 September 2002 04:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Default Routing in EIGRP [7:53239]
Well, 12.2.1 is the first revision of 12.2 mainline
that what you want to do would work, although I doubt it would
load balance between the two numbers - I think it would normally dial the
first number, and only dial the second number if the first one failed (or
is
engaged?)
Hope that helps,
JMcL
Andrew Larkins wrote:
Hi all,
I am
Hi,
I am using DLSW over frame relay already. Works great. From what I can
remember, DLSW+ establishes a TCP connection between the 2 routers, leaving
the SNA on the LAN's
-Original Message-
From: Adam Frederick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 04 September 2002 18:37
To: [EMAIL
Hi all,
I am just testing the theory here to see if this is possible.
I have a remote site with 2x ISDN BRI and a central site with 2x ISDN BRI.
These BRI's are backing up a dedicated 256k point to point link.
I have dialer interfaces created on both sites with the physical BRI's being
members
I have had the same porblems here - definately IOS related. All though I
have to manually erase the flash first, it works fine on the routers where
the flash is stored in DRAM - haven't ried it on a 2500.
This is fixed is ver 12.2 IOS.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: Chuck's Long Road
I have set it up here with another colleague using frame relay encapsulation
and dialing up into a Nortel passport. In both IOS ver 12.1 and 12.0, the
router crashed with a software error. When you use IOS ver 11.3 it works
perfectly!!
I haven't had a chance yet to get TACs opinion on this one
than the
CCDA exam??!!
Thanks in advance
Andrew Larkins
BCom, CCNP, CCDA
Bytes Technology Networks
A Division of the Bytes Technology Group
A Member of the Altron Group
www.btgroup.co.za
visit the press office @ www.itweb.co.za/office/bytes
Tel : +27 11 800 9336
Fax : +27 11 800 9496
Mobile : +27
eigrp uses 224.0.0.10
-Original Message-
From: Dusty Harper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 03:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: multicast address [7:50221]
The RFC would be a great place to check :)
RIPv2 uses 224.0.0.9 RFC 2453
IGRP is Cisco's
you need normal ISDN dialup config. The only difference is that on the
access lists for interesting traffic, you add a time range.
I have attached the time range and sample access list below:
access-list 145 remark Interesting traffic
access-list 145 deny eigrp any any
access-list 145 deny
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
