An interesting article I came across this morning:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/000/922dgmtd.a
sp
Comments?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35946&t=35946
--
FAQ, list archives, a
"router rip"
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: To CCIE's without a job [7:12805]
> I want to deploy DSPF here at work.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tony Medeiros"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 1:41 PM
> Subject: Re:
You're attributing a fault in "these guys" to a certification which doesn't
test on UNIX skills. In other words, they're CCIEs - they know more than
you or I do about routing and switching on Cisco routers (presumably). But
the CCIE is the *beginning* of an overall understanding of how networks
I don't think it really matters which routing protocol you use. The
"inside" interface is the one with the address you want to keep private
(like a 10.0.0.0 address). The "outside" interface is the one with a
publically-routable address (anything other than 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, or
192.168.0.0).
Just because you *can* mail something en masse doesn't mean that you
*should*.
- Original Message -
From: "Jennifer Cribbs"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 2:48 PM
Subject: not cisco but interesting... [7:14547]
> This is not cisco, but alot of things aren't. I received this fr
Ack! My groovy TLA got filtered!
"WPAYTTS?" ;-)
- Original Message -
From: "Wilson, Bradley"
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 4:17 PM
Subject: RE: BGP Filtering [7:15450]
> (i.e. What problem are you trying to solve? Why would you want to limit
the
> number of prefixes you rece
Does this have anything to do with that "Chambers" thread? ;-)
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Whalen"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: Work-related ACL problem [7:17695]
> ah yes the old in or out debate...
>
> Brian "Sonic" Whalen
> Success = Preparation
I heard that cert was still in Draft stage.
(insert collective eye-roll here.)
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Supino"
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 4:06 PM
Subject: RE: Can you pass CCNP w/o having Cisco gears? [7:18124]
> Nice Chuck. Don't forget to add CFTA(Certifi
***MINIMAL*** competence???
Right. And being promoted to Lucasian Professor of Mathematics is merely an
indication of minimal competence in Trig.
(Okay, so maybe that's an unfair exaggeration...it just really burns my
toast to see some typewriter jockey pooh-pooh the CCIE.)
- Original Mes
Chuck brings up a good point, one that has been thought of before: back
during the height of the arms race, it was theorized that it's a real bad
idea to centralize all of your capital. It was thought that maybe all the
factories should be spread out evenly, rather than concentrated in any one
pl
Well, since we're off-topic anyway...maybe if God existed, this incredible
loss of life wouldn't have occurred in the first place. Part of rebuilding
our society involves rebuilding our economy, so it's worth discussing. As
far as life is concerned, I'm donating blood later today, and I've made
Check out:
www.addall.com
This website looks up a book by ISBN number, and searches about 36 different
online bookstores and shows you all the prices it finds. Then you can go
grab the cheapest one that comes up. :-)
BJ
- Original Message -
From: "Circusnuts"
To:
Sent: Saturday, Se
Looks like this database doesn't handle 888 numbers, however - I just called
one with no problem.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Felt"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 10:45 AM
Subject: Fw: Nationwide Toll Free Outage [7:21859]
> Hi all,
>
> This message was forwarded to me,
Okay, but here's the million-dollar question: which consulting companies are
*hiring*??
""Chuck Larrieu"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> depending on the particulars, either one could be true. ;->
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
Hi Vance -
I too am studying All Things VoIP, and I'm curious how this would work.
Say you have User A trying to call User B. User B is currently in the
office. So User A dials '' which is User B's phone number (or "route
pattern" if you want to be specific). CallManager picks up the r
> My question is this ...
> (1) Since there are no configuration parameters
> for queue list 0, does
> custom queuing sort of have a 'priority' queing
> mechanism for Queue 0, in
> that Queue 0 will be completed 'drained' before
> the normal round-robin
> procedures occur for Queues 1 - 16, or
Ye
You can put the same configuration (ip address and interface-dlci) on the
major interface. The physical interface will then default to being a
point-to-point link. It would be a waste of interfaces to do this on a hub
router, but on a spoke it's fine. Your config would be:
> r(config)#int s0
>
> You Rock Priscilla!!
Actually, she does. Not too many know this, but she's in a band called
Priscilla and the A-Bombs. She plays bass. Her band opened for Motorhead
this summer. When can we expect a CD, Priscilla?? ;-)
BJ
(Go Blue.)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/rea
ss,
> and announce their
> > current
> > IP address. After that, the CM can simply
> forward based on the
> > IP
> > address. This capability is one of the
> primary reasons that
> > Moves, Adds,
> > and Changes in an IP Telephony system are far
> more
I haven't taken the lab yet, but I look at it this way: would answering
someone else's question about the lab environment be worth the price of never
being allowed to take the lab again? :-)
BJ
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 15:09:43 GMT Thomas Crowe wrote:
> I remember a while back I had the question o
> CCNP-to-be
Makes me think of "Free to Be CCNP"...
There's a land that I see,
Where the packets flow free...
;-)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56379&t=56293
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http:
I always put B.S. answers anyway - just random clicks. :-) I also note how
annoying it is to have to answer the questions *BEFORE* the test - get to it,
I say!
BJ
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:59:31 GMT Robert Edmonds
wrote:
> I've heard this same thing too. However, I
> really don't put much weig
Hi Manish -
Regarding your questions about queuing:
> Should I take it to mean that all queuing
> schemes such is RTP and LLQ, which
> use a variant of WFQ as their basis have
>
> (1) 'modified' one queue to be act as a HIGH
> PQ, or if you like, System
> Queue 0 in custom queuing, in that it ha
> Am I wrong or the CBWFQ does allow you to strict priority a traffic class
> using the keyword 'priority' ?
The priority keyword is what differentiates LLQ from CBWFQ. The priority
command is used when configuring the "priority" LLQ queue, whereas the rest
of the queues in LLQ can be configured
> I hear cisco is doing away with set based.
> Apparently the ccie lab includes
> two 3550's which are IOS based. Whoever told
> me this said cisco bought the
> set based system and created IOS themselves, so
> the plan is to do away with
> set based and go completely with their own
> stuff.
> Al
> My question is isn't network statement "network
> 192.168.3.0" required on
> both routers to enable rip?
There seems to be an odd discrepancy between the configurations for RTC and
RTD in part 2 of the solution.
RTC:
router rip
network 192.168.2.0 wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Am doing the written
> Just about the last phrase 'The "priority"
> command is not used with CBWFQ',
> considering that I call LLQ within CBWFQ, is
> it correct ?
Well...you calling it "LLQ within CBWFQ" isn't Cisco canon, but your config
below is a fine LLQ configuration.
I've noticed (especially in my studies of
e an ABT? :-)
>
> John
>
> >>> "Priscilla Oppenheimer" 10/31/02 1:40:24 PM
> >>>
> I like that: "acronym-based technologies." ;-)
>
> Priscilla
>
> "B.J. Wilson" wrote:
> >
> > > Just about the las
> Cool! This means the QoS exam will then only have 10 questions ... Well I
> can dream can't I ??? :)
I can see it now: Question 10 is, "What IOS command is used to configure
Auto-QoS?" Questions 1-9 ask about your background and prior
certifications, so the test can figure out how to *score* yo
Hey Proximo -
I'm sitting here looking over the outline of the DQOS test, and one of the
bullets says to "Explain the difference between classification and marking."
I'm looking over the QoS Config Guide, and can't seem to find any clear
distinction between the two - the Guide seems to be using t
on ip address..or
> source and destination UDP port number). After
> the packet has been
> classified then you Mark it by setting bits in
> the IP header(DSCP, IP
> precedence.)
>
> Juan Blanco
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:n
Uh...was the dollar sign a Freudian slip? :-)
Maybe you can be more precise...what sort of info are you looking for?
BJ
---Original Message---
From: "James Molefe (JM)"
Sent: 11/05/02 08:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCIE Routing $ Switching ( Written) [7:56894]
> Anyone with mo
> The real question is should I go ahead and go for multiple CCIE certs at
> once or is this just a really foolish idea.
I really, really, *really* don't want this to sound as caustic as it's going
to sound, but I gotta say it anyway: dude, passing the CCIE Written is
*nothing*. You don't have *a
The 3550 Multilayer Switch Software Configuration Guide contains a nice
explanation of the dot1x feature, but it doesn't really explain its
relationship with high availability. Maybe it'd be a start, though.
HTH,
BJ
---Original Message---
From: MADMAN
Sent: 11/08/02 10:53 AM
To: [EMAIL
Am I the only one who gets the funny feeling that such questions violate the
NDA?
BJ
---Original Message---
From:
Sent: 11/14/02 08:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]
> xxx,
How about Token Ring and IPX. Is there as much emphasis on th
Good timing - we just had this conversation a couple of weeks ago. :-)
There's a difference between a protocol being "connection-oriented" and it
being "reliable." The two are not related.
Frame Relay is "connection-oriented" in that it establishes a connection
between endpoints *before* any dat
tes the nda... now if you gave an example of a question - that would
probably violate the nda.
-----Original Message-
From: B.J. Wilson [mailto:analogkid01@;mindspring.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: Fw: New CCIE Written Exam [7:57341]
Am
> Our baseball season is over
> unfortunatley, and now all we have is football (ugh).
Priscilla!!! How dare you, on the eve of the UMich/Ohio State game?!?!
;-)
BJ
(Go Blue!!)
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57818&t=57780
---
I agree. If you have some janitor who's been saving up for months or years
to be able to afford your class, and he asks what a Cat 5 cable is, what do
you say? "Sorry, I will not answer that question"? How unprofessional.
BJ
- Original Message -
From: "Alan"
To:
Sent: Saturday, Nove
> sent with some reservation. perhaps a bit too personal. maybe some are
> interested in what is below.
You had me at "hello"...*sniff*... ;-)
One of my co-workers said once that "the CCIE is a certification for people
who don't have spouses and kids." Maybe he was right, I don't know, but as
lo
> CL: you have a partitioned area 0. can't have two area zeros in ospf. to
> quote from my favorite movie of all time, "There can be only one"
"I am Connor MacLeod of the Clan MacLeod. I was born in 1518 in the village
of Glenfinnan on the shores of Loch Shiel. And I am a CCIE."
Message
> CL: hey, all those guys had multiple identities. He could hit the Lab
> several times under different identities, scope it out, and probably pass
> after just a couple of tries.
Crude and slow, clansman. Your config was no better than that of a clumsy
child.
;-)
Message Posted at:
http://ww
Mike -
By any chance have you tested running your program on a Windows PC using
Cygwin? I'm not a Linux person (yet...), and I figured this might be a
passable way for PC-based users to use MINT.
BJ
---Original Message---
From: Mike Bernico
Sent: 12/02/02 09:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
> I am configuring QOS for Video-Conference on my CAT 4003.
> I would like to know what IP precedence numbers I can use to classify the
> video traffic.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_configuratio
n_guide_book09186a00800c5e31.html
CCO is your friend.
BJ
Messa
> Guys, the spelling is getting terrible. Even painful to read.
Agreed. The three R's are *not* "readin', routin', and 'rithmetic." ;-)
BJ
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58442&t=58422
--
FAQ, list archives, an
I would think that this would be a bad thing, for two reasons: one, the
number of people who put "CCIE Written" on their resumes will increase, and
the availability of lab dates will decrease.
US$0.02,
BJ
---Original Message---
From: Bernard
Sent: 12/03/02 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Guys, a reminder: you cannot begin a post to the mail list with an URL.
Type a line of text first, then paste the URL. The filters are designed to
look for an URL at the top of the post, to filter out spam.
BJ
---Original Message---
From: Charlie
Sent: 12/04/02 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PRO
You sure about that, Chuck? ;-)
2^n-2 = 8 ! a total of 8 subnets needed !
2^n = 10 ! add 2 to both sides !
n = 4 ! 2^4-2 = 14 !
128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1
1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
= 240, or answer A in the original post.
BJ
---Original Message---
From: The Long and Winding Road
Sent:
I have four PDFs that I found on CCO:
3550 Multilayer Switch Command Reference 12.1.11EA1
" "Hardware Installation Guide
" "Software Configuration Guide 12.1.11EA1
" "System Message Guide 12.1.11EA1
Tell me, and I may forget;
Show me, and I may remember;
Involve me, and I'll understand.
;-)
- Original Message -
From: "Kaminski, Shawn G"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 3:38 PM
Subject: RE: Routing Exam:640-901 [7:58867]
> Agreed. When you actually "do" something, it tends to
Can you post the URL please?
Thanks,
BJ
---Original Message---
From: Cisco Nuts
Sent: 12/13/02 10:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3550 Study Guide - IPExpert --Awesome!! [7:59178]
> For those inquiring about the 3550 study guide, the one on IPExpert is
.AWESOME! And i
> I just got my CCIE written last week
No, you didn't. You took a written test and passed it, but you didn't "get"
anything.
Remember, the CCIE Written is *NOT* a certification.
BJ
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=59399&t=59332
---
> I think I'm keeping Amazon in business!
Funny, I'm taking the opposite tack: I've pretty much stopped buying Cisco
Press books, and have just started printing out PDFs from CCO. Anytime I
want to learn something new, I start by doing a search for whatever it is,
followed by "configuration guide
Odd - this link didn't work for me until I replaced the "cco-rtp-1" host
with plain ol' "www"...if anyone else had this problem, give it a shot.
>
http://cco-rtp-1.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps282/products_installa
tion_guide_chapter09186a008007dfd0.html
BJ
Message Posted at:
http://
> Does the CCIE qualification exam itself have any worth.
Aside from making you eligible to register for the Lab, no.
> I know that your not
> a CCIE without giving the actual Lab part of the exam, but how does the
CCIE
> written exam scale on its own, career wise. Does it help improve job
> pros
Name one certification test you can take this into. ;-)
BJ
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel Lafraia"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 3:03 PM
Subject: IP Calculator [7:53564]
> For those who use PHP, I wrote a simple function to calculate IP
broadcast,
> wildcard mask, host
Hey Superfriends -
I notice three QoS-related titles on the CiscoPress website, but I'm
wondering which one corresponds with the Cisco DQOS course. Anyone have any
insight?
Thanks,
BJ
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53571&t=53571
---
According to a couple of co-workers who are more knowledgeable about Windows
than I am, it would not be possible to find out from the desktop itself once
the history and Temporary Internet Files have been cleared (they note that
the
information *may* be stored in a cookie, but it's not likely).
>
Hi Priscilla -
Can I ask you to expound a bit on something you said in an earlier
discussion? When talking about IPv6, you mentioned:
> ...even though NAT is a horrid solution from a
> technical standpoint.
I don't have an opinion about NAT simply due to a lack of practical
exp
Hey Spongebob fans -
I've noticed a couple of "new" access-list ranges (1300-1999 and
2000-2699), which may not be all that "new," but they're ones I've never
encountered before. After a cursory search on CCO, I can't find any
documentation that really explains what they really do. Anyone h
I disagree - how does router B know to route traffic back to router A?
Router
B will need some static route back to Router A, or some other IGP needs to
run
between A and B. As it is now, traffic *can* get from router A to the OSPF
cloud, but not back.
BJ
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 13:36:02 GMT Rob
Hi Randy -
I'm not clear on what you're asking here. You've got an ethernet interface
with two network addresses on it:
205.109.29.128/25
205.109.29.32/27
And a loopback with yet another subnet address on it:
205.109.29.24/29
Three different subnets, three different addresses...what are you
My Dearest Superman -
I'm having what should be an easily-solvable problem with ISDN. I have a
feeling the problem is with the mapping, but Caslow talks about a "dynamic
mapping" function provided by PPP. I don't see it happening. Here's the
gist
of it:
Goal: Have R2 (12.1(5)) be the dial
> 191.72.223.0 /24 (223 = 0001)
Whoa! 223 does not equal 0001. 223 equals 1101.
JohnZ was correct in his original post, that his list of subnets can be
summarized 191.72.0.0/19, and Chuck's addendum (that he'll also be
summarizing additional subnets other than the ones he mentioned
Dear Joel -
I read in the "Switching Services Configuration Guide," page XC-15, that
"Fast switching is not supported on serial interfaces using encapsulations
other than HDLC." This contradicts earlier examples, particularly where fast
switching is enabled on the "hub" side of a frame relay
Dear Silent Bob:
Okay lunchbox, my co-workers and I are trying to figure out if Frame Relay is
connectionless or connection-oriented. A lot of documentation I'm reading
says it *is*, but somewhere in the chasms of my memory banks I can't help but
think that it is *not*, because a) it would be re
Well, I tend to look at things from a "global" or "Layer 1 through 7"
perspective: does Frame Relay perform the same functions that TCP does? In
other words, does it perform a check to make sure every single IP packet (or
Frame Relay frame) makes it from the ingress point of the Frame cloud to th
> But should be different? True for the test and
> untrue in the real-world??
This is an unfortunate and all-too-common occurrence: the discrepancy between
marketing, and how things actually work. Cisco is a victim of it (e.g.
"hybrid" routing protocol), but Microsoft is arguably the worst offen
Well, it's not really "racism," it's xenophobia. But yeah, the original
poster was speaking the International Language of Laziness. ;-)
BJ
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 13:45:32 GMT Robert Edmonds
wrote:
> Nice racist attitude there. Nothing like good
> ole American bigotry posted
> all over the glob
> Apply logic, not rules.
Priscilla, how would you like a very high management position at EDS? Your
philosophy would be a breath of much-needed fresh air... ;-)
BJ
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55521&t=55458
---
70 matches
Mail list logo
