B? How can her workstation retain connectivity if it's turned off? Could you
successfully ping it?
A seems right to me.
=?iso-8859-1?q?maine=20dude?= wrote:
Hi,
I know that this should be a easy question, I think that the
answer is B.
But the book says A, what do you think the answer is?
So I guess it's now 1,000,001 times :-)) Still, I don't blame anyone for
believing this urban legend of the networking world when authorities such as
Doyle and Caslow continue to propagate it. I just wonder how the AD=0 rumor
ever got started.
However, although the AD=1 for both routes, they are
I am skeptical, Tom. Someone, I think it was Howard, researched this as far
back as 9.x releases without finding the AD=0 behavior. I can't support this
as I couldn't find it in the archives and I have not tried it myself. But,
in order to prove that AD=0 never existed one would have to test all
That is very interesting. Can you give us a little more background about how
your relationship with your publisher went so badly wrong? I for one know
very little about how publisher-author deals work and would like to hear
more, it it's not too painful to relate!
Obviously I made a big
Oh, but I thought corporate management can never be wrong.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of n
rf
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 6:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: how about ccie salary in US? [7:71143]
Jack Nalbandian wrote
of a network.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of n
rf
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 7:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: how about ccie salary in US? [7:71143]
Jack Nalbandian wrote:
That is anecdotal nonsense. Any major corporation in need
: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 1:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: how about ccie salary in US? [7:71143]
Jack Nalbandian wrote:
CCIEs with some experience are considered to have college
equivalent
experience and training as it pertains to technical know-how,
knowledge
that has proven
That is anecdotal nonsense. Any major corporation in need of real techs and
that has a Cisco infrastructure will certainly consider CCIEs very
seriously, yes even above so-called CS degree holders without much
experience, for technical lead positions. I can bring examples that are not
merely
Yes. As long as you have the right codecs running.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Kengie
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco Third Party H323 Device [7:70568]
Dear All,
Can Cisco VoIP Box connect
wrote:
Thank you gents,
I have come to the conclusion that Jack and NRF is one and the
same person.
Anyone who has seen, or read, Fight Club will recognise the
symptoms. Any
minute now NRF will shoot himself through the mouth and end it
all.
I think I really am going to go postal if people
[NRF] Uh, no the free market responds by giving preference to certain
well-known
elite colleges. Everybody knows that not every bachelor's degree is born
the same. Some are far more valuable than others. Goldman Sachs will send
recruiters to Harvard, but not Podunk Community College. And this
networking. But I'd find a
new career tomorrow if I'd be capped at $20k a year due to market
pressures. Afterall, I have a family to feed. :-)
At 09:03 AM 6/9/2003 +, you wrote:
Jack Nalbandian wrote:
My friend NRF (what is your name anyhow?),
Others have expressed concern, true
[NRF] In this thread, I have attacked what has happened to the CCIE lately.
Not
the CCIE in general, just what has happened to it lately. This is a
[JN] Your overall approach has a pattern to it, and your response ironically
reenforces the notion. The number of CCIE thread merely complements
You can pass one test, only the BSCI or BCRAN test, and retain you CCNA
status (for another 3 years) until you can test for the rest.
You don't need to retest for the CCNA at all.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Walker, James, IS
Sent:
I think that you only need to pass one CCNP test in order to extend your
CCNA status.
Below is a quote from www.cisco.com
CCNA certifications are valid for three years. To recertify, pass the
current certification exam or any new exam at the Professional or Cisco
Qualified Specialist level
, as there have been requests for
this to stop.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of n
rf
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2003 2:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: number of CCIE??? [7:70328]
Jack Nalbandian wrote:
My friend NRF (what
John,
Perhaps your bias is based on the intrinsic value of longevity, of
experience, associated with the lower number. You tell me.
Another poster, Craig Columbus [EMAIL PROTECTED],
pointed out market forces, to which I find no objection, however speculative
it is. There is the trend of
This constant blare of prejudicial bias in favor of college ed and to the
definite disfavor of certification seems to come most intensely from your
address. The undertext is always the same: Go to college.
Is there a career-oriented quasi-political interest element at play here
somewhere? Do
of CCIE??? [7:70328]
Jack Nalbandian wrote:
This constant blare of prejudicial bias in favor of college
ed and to the
definite disfavor of certification seems to come most
intensely from your
address. The undertext is always the same: Go to college.
Woah, now there's something that completely
Dude, with all due respect, are you a recruiter for some college somwhere?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of n
rf
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 9:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: number of CCIE [7:70151]
Sigh. I knew this was going
ctrl-shift-6, ctrl-shift-6, x
Type one ctrl-shift-6 for each link in your chain of telnets, then the final
x.
Iwan Hoogendoorn wrote:
I want to set up my own LAB so that i can remotely log in.
i have 2 2509 and i want to connect 10 routers and 2 switches
If i want to login remotely i
No, you type x, not a number. This sounds more confusing than it is. I
will try to be more clear. You have
PC--2509#1--2509#2--Router
You telnet from PC to 2509#1, then telnet again to 2509#2, then again to
Router. You are now at CLI of Router. If you type
ctrl-shift-6, x
you will end up at CLI
Old timers will remember Mac vs DOS/Windows. Or UNIX vs DOS. Or Beta vs VHS.
More recent is Linux vs FreeBSD, or one flavor of Linux distribution vs
another. (See http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=19990301 for example.
By the way, if you are not familiar with www.userfriendly.org, you gotta
not the point. Jack Welch had a PhD in chemical engineering
from
Illinois - what does knowing about thermodynamics have anything to do with
running a conglomerate like GE? Again, not the point. In fact, there are
precious few instances of people graduating from college and then actually
using
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2003 2:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Prolonged Batchlers Vs. CCNP ? [7:69483]
Jack, I would submit the following 2 points:
First off, the fact is, college is on the whole proven
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
John A. Kilpatrick
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Prolonged Batchlers Vs. CCNP ? [7:69483]
On 5/24/03 6:53 PM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jack Nalbandian wrote:
My opinion on the matter remains the same
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
John A. Kilpatrick
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Prolonged Batchlers Vs. CCNP ? [7:69483]
On 5/24/03 6:53 PM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jack Nalbandian wrote:
My opinion on the matter remains the same
I have been to the above links, but i m still not satisfied with the
replies. I am preparing for the routing exam, in the last release it was
titled as building scalable cisco internetworks. The objectives of these
exams are identical. so whats new in here the exam numbers. The only
difference i
Hi vijay
Can u plz tell me abt ur background. I am asking this because, I think CCIE
exam requires an extensive amount of practical experience rather thatn
classroom knowledge.
I am preparing for CCNP and do not like to pay higher classroom pricess. It
is better to purchase the equipment than
Hi All
What's so different in the new exams in the CCNP series than the last ones?
Does it cover different topics or have cisco ammended the objectives by
adding new topics in the exams?
Can I use same books to study for this exam?
The only change would be in testing the practical knowledge. For
Certain models of 2501 have a PCMCIA slot inside the case. I have never
tried to use it, though, and I do not know what it's for. I have always
assumed that it was just a holdover from some older implementation and Cisco
just kept using those boards until the supplies ran out. But I don't know
Hmm...that suggests that a VLSM-aware redirect would be useful. Send the
mask along with the network address in other words. Does such a thing exist,
or has it ever been proposed?
Answer: The host can't know about subnet masks being used
elsewhere. Also, with classless addressing, it can't
Deep Thoughts from Jack Handy.
I
I personally enjoy posts by nrf! Someone that has a sense of humor, its a
good thing.
Thank you and God bless,
Jack Handy
From: nrf
Reply-To: nrf
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CCIE Vs. BS or MS degree [7:59481]
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 03:20:52 GMT
Deep thoughts from Jack Handy
I kind of agree with you that they need decent networking courses at the
undergrad level. I don't want to go into my whole reason for going for
my bachelor's, but I got my CCNP less than a year ago, and decided I
would rather get a bachelor's in comp sci
Look like the ATM Network Processor Module With E3/DS-3 PLIM
see:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis4000/4000cn/1000npm.htm#21021
Pretty good deal on this I'd say. Did you buy it? Has anyone else noticed
the eBay router prices have fallen significantly lately?
I suppose a CCIE is sort of a Ph.D. of networking. Studying for and taking
the written is the equivalent of coursework, then doing hands-on to prepare
for the lab is like research for your dissertation, the the lab test
represents the oral exam. But I wouldn't stretch the analogy too far. For
one
the following is configuration of my cat6509:
--- --- --- ---
---
1 2WS-X6K-SUP2-2GE SAD053202VH Hw : 2.2
Fw : 6.1(3)
Fw1: 6.1(3)
On my IOS 6509 the flash card is disk0 not slot0.
MADMAN wrote:
What are you typing?
Native6506#dir bootflash:
Directory of bootflash:/
1 -rw- 7110024 Mar 29 2002 12:48:52
c6msfc2-js-mz.121-4.E1
2 -rw- 1611604 Mar 29 2002 12:49:42
c6msfc2-boot-mz.121-4.E1
Didn't you like my disk0 idea? :-)
xxx6509#dir disk0:
Directory of disk0:/
1 -rw- 13201 Sep 18 2002 18:42:48 6509_20020918.cfg
2 -rw-20775248 Sep 18 2002 18:51:00
c6sup22-po3sv-mz.121-11b.E4.bin
If your Flash card is an ATA, you won't see it with CatOS and it's
As long as we're dreaming...how about adding a big whiteboard with Caslow or
Pavlichenko stationed in front? :-)
Thomas Larus wrote:
Dream lab
2 3640s with 2 FE, 2 t1 serial ints, and ATM 155 (or 2621 with
two wic-1ts,
if ATM cannot be part of this dream)
3 2610s with two t1 serial
Any way I can get a more complete look at my Frame LMI than debug gives me?
I would take the complete frame and manually decode it if I could figure out
how to capure it. This is on a production router but it is lightly loaded
so reasonable debugs are possible. If only I had a Sniffer... but I
I am looking for R/S Lab study partner(s) in Tallahassee or surrounding area.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54801t=54801
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
This is probably something simple, or maybe it's a Microsoft thing, but my
W2K laptop won't respond to pings or tftp requests. I have a 2621 router and
the laptop plugged into a 2950 switch, all in Vlan1, all extremely simple.
From the laptop I can ping the switch and router and telnet to the
DOH! Okay, I will wear the dunce cap. I had forgotten about the Cisco VPN
client I had installed. The concentrator I was testing had the same address
as the router does now. I uninstalled the VPN and it's fine now. Excuse the
wasted bandwidth :)
Message Posted at:
Thanks for your help. I have a bunch of different DB25 adapters but the one
that I think is a real Cisco part has pin 2 yellow, pin 3 black, and pin 7
red and green.
MADMAN wrote:
Pull the DB25 of fof the router and tell me what color pins are
in 2,3
and 7. If not yel, blk, red then it
Okay, that's the standard DB9 adapter from a console kit. And the rollover
cable, right?
MADMAN wrote:
That is it, now you need a matching DB9, I'm assuming, for your
PC but
the pinout will be 2,3 and 5.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=54237t=54114
Well, darn. If its not the cable then I don't know what to try. Guess it's a
boat anchor. :-(
Thanks for the help.
MADMAN wrote:
Yes. I just went back in the lab and connected up to a 4000 to
verify
what I've been spewing and it works.
Message Posted at:
Not to belabor the obvious, but if you don't want to buy a book right now
there's always good ole CCO.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/bgp-toc.html
has lots of nuts and bolts and runs 71pp in pdf form.
I think Halabi's original paper, the one he later expanded into his book,
was once on
I cannot get a response from the console port on my ebay as-is 4000M
router. Per earlier thread and archives, I think I have the right cable--a
straight through DB9-DB25 modem data cable. Some referred to rollover with
db25 adapter, but I tried all the adapters in my spare part box to no avail.
Can anyone here tell me how the term split horizon came to be applied to
routing protocols? Who first used the term and when?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53938t=53938
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription
I just acquired a 4000 router and can't get it to respond through the
console port. As usual in this case, I suspect I have a cable problem. I
thought I needed a straight through DB9-DB25 modem cable, but it doesn't
seem to work. I want to make sure I have the right cable before I start
chasing
You might try TCPspeed. I have used it in the past to verify CIR (at least
approximately).
http://maximized.com/freeware/tcpspeed/
shojaee wrote:
Dear sirs,
I'm a member of technical staff in an ISP site. We have cable
connection to
the internet with 512k bandwidth.
I require to do the
experts will revise their books!! :-)
-Jack
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=53475t=53282
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure
problem. Also, on Router2501A, I have no idea where the no auto-summary
statement came from either. But, it is working now
Thanks for your help and ideas.
Jack
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51500t=51483
--
FAQ
help.
Jack
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51483t=51483
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
192.168.2.0
Any further ideas?
Thanks,
Jack
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51485t=51483
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure
) network 172.168.0.0
Jack
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51486t=51483
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL
FAST PAGE with PARITY
(4X36) 72 PIN
Thanks,
Jack
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=50627t=50572
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct
I don't care about a SmartNet contract. Will a standard, fast-page with
parity SIMM chip work with a 2500 series router? Am I asking for trouble if
I don't get a for Cisco 2500 series ram?
I found this chip for $6: 16 MB SIMM FAST PAGE with PARITY (4X36) 72 PIN
Thanks,
Jack
Message Posted
will be a major player.
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Jack.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47429t=47429
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
If you are doing either ccna,ccnp,ccie , check this site out. They have
router labs for hands-on. I have bought some and are ideal for hands-on
practice. Affordable!!.
site name is : www.officechoice.co.nz
good luck.
thanks
_
i want to take ccie written examination !
who can make a plan of study for me !
and please list the books and documents i should read !
thanks very much !
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34187t=34187
--
FAQ, list
699!
i passed it just yesterday !
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=34246t=34226
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
My recommendation for a primary study source for CCIE written would be the
Caslow book.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=21201t=21195
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
I have a hard time understanding that arrogance on
the part of a nation deserves any punishment from
another. Is not the punisher of arrogance even more
arrogant?... shame
on Reeta Sinha. How can you justify any violence in
the light of arrogance?... certainly not mass murder
of mothers,
I don't quite know how reliable this can be as of yet. None of the CCIEs
that I know of (that even some of our corporate partners have on staff)
exist according to this tool.
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 5:30 PM
To:
That's a BS (to the nth) Degree. Some managers require it!
-Original Message-
From: William Gragido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 9:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PASSED BCRAN! + BIG gripe [7:7794]
That reeks of BS
-Original Message-
From:
QuestionsResponse
Do you own or use any kind of PDA(Personal Digital Assistant)? yes
Do you own or use a digital camera or camcorder?yes
Do you own or use a Sony game console such as PS1,PS2 or Gameboy? no
Do you own or use a MP3 player? no
Do you own or
The example company (are you referring to the Cisco Press BSCN book?) has a
campus of multiple buildings, and each separate building (or dttached
building to the main building) is referred to as a pod.
-Original Message-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
I know this might veer off topic:
Maybe I am biased (and partly curious), mostly due to working at a company
that actually did refer to its building sub-units as pods, and
subsequently its network subnets (with a scheme pretty much dictated by the
company campus' physical subdivisions) as
Wait, what device is the thingie/podmaker?
Priscilla wrote:
I just finished writing some information on pods in the protocol
analysis
world. In that case, a pod is an extra little thingie (technical
term) that
helps the analyzer get on the network. With
Is that a layer 2 or 3?
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 1:48 PM
To: Jack Nalbandian; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
it's kinda like a doohickey but not nearly as high end as a
thingamajiggy
The dot com yuppy depression knocked down the stock prices and any and all
lab hopes along with it here.
But, generally speaking, if you work in a
production/development/manufacturing environment (i.e. some place where they
actually *make* things), you might want to send them an e-learning
Howard? what problem is the doohickey trying to solve as opposed to the
thing-a-ma-doogey?
(OK, I will stop if you stop, if I stop...:))
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 2:32 PM
To: Jack Nalbandian; [EMAIL PROTECTED
of Open the pod bay doors HAL.
- Original Message -
From: Jack Nalbandian
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
I know this might veer off topic:
Maybe I am biased (and partly curious), mostly due to working at a
company
that actually
Your convergence time is too long, goodbye
The conversation had ended when it began.
-Original Message-
From: hal9001 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
Jack, this conversation can no longer
Actually (and seriously),
The company uses the term pod to describe the satellite building, i.e. the
subdivisions within the physical layout of the campus. This then is applied
in reference to the subnets that are essentially defined by those
architectural/geographic divisions. Interestingly,
the door prize. The pod bay door that
is.
Bryan
- Original Message -
From: Allen May
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: POD, what is that? [7:10128]
I dunno. But it makes me think of Open the pod bay doors HAL.
- Original Message -
From: Jack
I thought IPX was layer 2 in the IPX/SPX stack.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Manafa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 7:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
IPX is layer 3
Switches operate at layer
Seems to be generated by a trojan.
-Original Message-
From: Robert (BOB) Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 7:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: dirty e-mails [7:9787]
Anyone keep getting mail from ***@sexyfun.net ?
I noticed that they sent [EMAIL
Correct!
My mistake.
-Original Message-
From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 10:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
ipx is layer 3, spx is 4..
Bri
- Original Message -
From: Jack
. It's a myth that NCP uses SPX.
It doesn't.
Priscilla
At 12:57 PM 6/25/01, Jack Nalbandian wrote:
I thought IPX was layer 2 in the IPX/SPX stack.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Manafa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 7:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
, June 25, 2001 1:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: why there are so many IPX traffic in my network [7:9045]
At 12:11 PM 6/25/01, Jack Nalbandian wrote:
Thank you veery much for clarifying that.
Pardon my ignorance on Novell stuff, but does this mean, then, that the
ODI wrap and IPX share
but can also act as
it's own conectionless transport too (layer 4) like UDP.. IPX does
HAVE
to use SPX for transport. so IPX is really a Layer3 4 protocol
Mike W.
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
At 12:11 PM 6/25/01,
Distance Vector? (Sybex/Lammle/Cisco Press)
C. Path Vector? (Syngress/Osborne)
Regards,
Jack Nalbandian, CCNA, MCSE
Network Engineer
DATAFLEX - U.S. Operations
310.445.1052 x275
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.telephonyexperts.com
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity
I had a little trouble with the tcbc part of booksonline,
but I called (317) 541-8920 and they got everything strightened out to my
satisfaction.
--Original Message--
From: Michael L. Williams
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 4, 2001 1:00:30 PM GMT
Subject: Re: Book club [7:6811]
me
ADEQUATE BACKGROUND to START THE TRUE LEARNING PROCESS MORE EFFICIENTLY in
the WORK ENVIRONMENT. It would have taken me much longer otherwise.
I totally encourage all those wishing to push for their certs to GO full
speed at ahead.
Regards,
Jack Nalbandian, CCNA, MCSE
Network Engineer
In addition to exposure to the archaic material with the probability of
applying in mind, some sort of formal curriculum is required to arm someone
with an upt-o-date conceptual background in an industry that is in flux to
such a ridiculous degree. Even a seasoned master would need a formal
I have a client with sites in Singapore, Silicon Valley, Israel and London
who is looking to consolidate as much of their voice traffic over IP for
toll bypass reasons as possible. Initially the best suggestion seems to be a
Nortel 4400 series Frame switch, especially in light of the fact that
Huh?
For future reference, when someone achieves something significant, the
correct response is CONGRATULATIONS!.
I don't know what our friend does for a living, but if I can pass the CCIE
lab on the second try, I'll be very pleased with myself.
--Original Message--
From: Q
To:
hi,everyone here
i meet a problem in using MRTG to survey the traffic of POS interface in
cisco's GSR router and juniper's m160 router,the amount of traffic of pos
interface displayed in MRTG is much smaller than that displayed in router's
exec command,but they are same if the interface is a atm
I completely agree with Phil. I used Boson #2 for Switching and got my
highest score so far.
I used Routing (#2, I think) and got my lowest score so far.
- Original Message -
From: Circusnuts
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: BCMSN EXAM [7:1912]
Boson't
Nobody who's secure in their talents is offended by your age. It
might be a reminder for some of us
fogies to stay on our toes, though!
I remember the age of not being taken seriously - knock 'em dead, Dude.
- Original Message -
From: Russ Kreigh
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 24,
How many MD's in the world? A lot! Still worth pursuing, though.
- Original Message -
From: victor delta
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: CCIE depreciation in 2 years [7:1882]
For those that care to ponder such things and need a diversion from
their focus
I THINK it was 90 minutes when I took it (in January). Passing score
755.
- Original Message -
From: Antonio Ramirez Volker
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 12:53 PM
Subject: How long ? [7:1928]
Two very simple question..
How long takes the CID exam?
What is the pass grade?
PacketShaper from www.packeteer.com
Stephen Skinner wrote in message ...
Guys,
i need a bandwidth manager/qos system to look for mp3/napster/nudy packets
going out my wan
i`ve read a bit about cisco subnetwork bandwidth manager and wondered if
it was any good???
any other suggestions
It reminds me more of "Life of Brian", where Brian tells the multitude "You're all
individuals! You're all different!"
A single voice in the crowd replies "I'm not".
--Original Message--
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 29, 2001 6:30:18
are they pretty much one and the same thing?
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
got good amount stuffs really you can make use of it. =
To tell you the truth, out of the 65 questons I was asked at the real =
test, about 40Qs line-by-line were from Suresh's kit. I was really =
zapped.=20
[snip]
Regards,
Jack Nalbandian, CCNA, MCSE
Network Engineer
DATAFLEX - U.S. Operations
My humble opinion: Get both books, if you can afford them.
Lammle [Sybex] is fantastic at making things clear and concise, but you will
need the Cisco Press material for more in-depth information.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Lob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27,
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
