I passed it three weeks ago, no to hard
I uesd the Top Down Network Design book, it´s a great book, but I actuly
just got through half of it before the exam.
it´s not that hard, and I took the CCDA, the old version after the CID and i
would say the cid is a little harder, and not as boring i.e. d
Hi,
I have done that exam today and passed barely. This after I failed barely
last week.
I used great books (because I like great books!).
1. Top Down Network Design - Priscilla Oppenheimer.
2. Cisco Internetwork Design - Mathew Birkner.
3. Boson Test #1 Practice Test.
These resources will take
Tim/Shawn,
In regards to the CID 640-025 exam...I have heard rumors that AT and IPX
have been somewhat removed as well? The current exam objectives on CCO
would indicate this, but like others, I doubt Cisco's honesty on their
exam objectives a bit. Can you confirm or deny this rumor of AT & IPX
be
m." I
haven't heard of any SNA showing up on the CID exam, but sometimes I find it
hard to trust Cisco when it comes to the exams! :-)
Shawn K.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Metz [mailto:timmetz@;hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 12:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
No SNA on the blueprint means no SNA on the test. I took it a few months ago
and didn't have any either.
Tim
""David"" wrote in message
news:200211120415.EAA12014@;groupstudy.com...
> Hi folks,
>
> The CID exam. The Cisco has a lot of SNA content in it,
> however I can't find any SNA stuff at (e
Words of advice for any test.
Thanks,
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Bernard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 2:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Dan Penn'
Subject: RE: CID Exam 3.0 [7:48839]
Dan,
My first e-mail to the CID practice test users informi
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of
> Dan Penn
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: CID Exam 3.0 [7:48839]
>
> Thanks for the heads up Bernard, I hadn't even looked
ECTED]] On Behalf Of
Bernard
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CID Exam 3.0 [7:48839]
Cisco has made changes to its CID objectives. The following is the
updated link:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/10/wwtraining/certprog/testing/current_
exams/640-025.ht
:
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:54 PM
Subject: RE: CID Exam 3.0 [7:48839]
> Dan Penn wrote:
> >
> > Check out the outline on CCO. As far as I know SNA, IPX, and
> > Applecrap,
> > I mean I talk, are still there for CID.
>
> And, sir, why do you call it Applecrap?
Priscilla, you know I'm writing on a Mac. Still, this reminds me of
Eve's explanation of giving Adam the Apple! :-)
Technically correct, of course.
At 5:54 PM + 7/15/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>Dan Penn wrote:
>>
>> Check out the outline on CCO. As far as I know SNA, IPX, and
>> A
CTED]
> Subject: RE: CID Exam 3.0 [7:48839]
>
> Check out the outline on CCO. As far as I know SNA, IPX, and
Applecrap,
> I mean I talk, are still there for CID.
>
> Dan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of
>
>Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>>
>> Priscilla, you know I'm writing on a Mac. Still, this reminds
>> me of
>> Eve's explanation of giving Adam the Apple! :-)
>
>Or maybe giving Alan the Apple. Hee hee. Inside joke.
So _that_ explains your attitude about the SNAke.
>
>I am a little sensitive whe
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> Priscilla, you know I'm writing on a Mac. Still, this reminds
> me of
> Eve's explanation of giving Adam the Apple! :-)
Or maybe giving Alan the Apple. Hee hee. Inside joke.
I am a little sensitive when it comes to AppleTalk, having been intimately
involved in it
Dan Penn wrote:
>
> Check out the outline on CCO. As far as I know SNA, IPX, and
> Applecrap,
> I mean I talk, are still there for CID.
And, sir, why do you call it Applecrap? ;-) Seriously, can you provide some
technical reasons to disparage it?
Perhaps it's still on Cisco tests because the p
Check out the outline on CCO. As far as I know SNA, IPX, and Applecrap,
I mean I talk, are still there for CID.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
suaveguru
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 9:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CID Exam 3.
I took the new exam about 6 weeks ago and didn't see any SNA questions
and it is not listed on the exam objectives page.
-Original Message-
From: Bernard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Andy Barkl'
Subject: RE
/640-025.html
Please watch the wrap.
Bernard Omrani
Author of Boson CID#1
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of
> Andy Barkl
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 5:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669]
>
> There i
There is no SNA or Appletalk on the new CID exam. Cisco wouldn't lie to
you.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
STRAND Scott
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 6:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669]
T
compensated for it (in fact, sort of the opposite! ;-)
> >
> > Priscilla
> >
> > >Elmer
> > >
> > >- Original Message -
> > >From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
> > >To:
> > >Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2
zon. My review is sincere and I'm not at all
> compensated for it (in fact, sort of the opposite! ;-)
>
> Priscilla
>
> >Elmer
> >
> >----- Original Message -
> >From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
> >To:
> >Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:
--- Original Message -
>From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
>To:
>Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:12 AM
>Subject: RE: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669]
>
>
> > At 10:03 PM 4/1/02, Robert Padjen wrote:
> > >Top Down is a great book for DCN, but it's not really
Robert Padjen
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669]
Top Down is a great book for DCN, but it's not really
for the CID. I'll go out on a limb and suggest mine (
;) ). Sybex CID Study Guide. To save a buck, if you
feel comfortabl
Here is my list for the CID:
DCN
Padjen book
Top Down
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669]
At 10:03 PM 4/1/02
: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:12 AM
Subject: RE: CID Exam Cert Book [7:39669]
> At 10:03 PM 4/1/02, Robert Padjen wrote:
> >Top Down is a great book for DCN, but it's not really
> >for the CID. I'll go out on a limb and suggest mine (
> >;) ). Sybex CID Study Guide.
At 10:03 PM 4/1/02, Robert Padjen wrote:
>Top Down is a great book for DCN, but it's not really
>for the CID. I'll go out on a limb and suggest mine (
>;) ). Sybex CID Study Guide.
I'm sure you'll get flamed for advertising your own book, but I'm going to
give you a hard time also for lack of ac
Top Down is a great book for DCN, but it's not really
for the CID. I'll go out on a limb and suggest mine (
;) ). Sybex CID Study Guide. To save a buck, if you
feel comfortable with the material, you may want to
forgo the big book and use the Exam Notes (used books
are out there too). The new test
The book is not that great. It has many errors and omissions.
I recommend the Cisco Press Top-Down Network Design book for the new CID
exam.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
STRAND Scott
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:32 PM
To: [EMAI
I also took it last week, after 2/25/02, and noticed no changes from the
objective list prior to the date that you have stated. While there are some
changes on the objectives listed on the website, now, ATM & ATM LANE are
still mentioned as objective categorys.
_
SNA is not listed in the objectives of the web site and it was gone as
of 2/25/02.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Carl
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 11:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CID exam has changed [7:37074]
I took this
I took this test last Friday and SNA was still there.
Jason Forrester
CCIE #8748
Andy Barkl wrote:
>The CID exam was recently updated. The new objectives are on the web
>site.
>The SNA and extensive ATM coverage is gone. Also Appletalk, IPX, DLSW,
>are gone as well.
>
>The exam is 90 minutes lo
Its about time they revised and updated that terrible exam!! Thanks for
letting us know!
Randy
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37095&t=37074
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/li
WOO WHOOO I am taking in it two weeks, I hate SNA!!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Andy Barkl
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CID exam has changed [7:37074]
The CID exam was recently u
As Cisco says, 640-025 is the current CID exam.
Good luck pal.
Dvass
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35728&t=35685
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report mis
Hi Michalis,
I took my CID 3 about a month ago and the test exam number was 640-025.
"CID 3.0 #640-025 Nov 9 2001 P"
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Federico Diaz Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 6:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
The 640-025 is still a valid exam towards your CCDP. The 640-520 is supposed
to replace the 640-025, however, I'm not sure when. The 641-520 beta was
quite a while ago but I don't think Cisco liked the results, which is
probably why it's taking so long to put out the replacement 640-520 exam.
They
Support 640-506, replace CIT
regards
-Original Message-
From: Michalis Palis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Lunes, 10 de Diciembre de 2001 07:48 a.m.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CID exam [7:28668]
Hello all
I am just about to take the CID exam but i dont know
whixh exam to take.
Buy and read the Cisco Press CID Book. Boson is going to help you answer
about 2 questions out of 100 right.
Jim Walker
Master Network Engineer
Partners HealthCare System, Inc.
Information Systems / Technical Services & Operations
Tel. (617) 732-8803
Fax (617) 264-5130
This e-mail message and an
Scott Nawalaniec
Network Administrator
CCNP, CCDP, CCNA, CCDA, CNA, MCP, Network+
-Original Message-
From: Stull, Cory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CID Exam on Wednesday 11/21/01 [7:26486]
Darren,
I personally took the CID
Darren,
I personally took the CID beta a while ago and I'm not sure if they made it
into the new exam.. I personally thought the CID beta was harder than the
CCIE written and just as encompassing. Nowhere near as bad on rif type
stuff though.
Cory
-Original Message-
From: Darren Cra
I just searched cisco on those two key words (sna / stratacom) and found
pages of info for you to study.
good luck.
""Rayhan Uddin"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All,
>
> I need help for the CID exam, I'm going for CID this week and have no idea
> from wher
>>for now Cisco only
> wants you to know what they are and some general
> stuff about it.
Not true. Check this web siteand follow the links.
It has more than what u need.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/74/topissues/wan_sw/top_issues_wansw.shtml
VB
--- Paul Jin wrote:
> Robert Padjen
Simple pre-sales level stuff on 'stratacom' is all I remember having to
know. Number of slots, backplane, etc. You will do better in your search
on CCO if you search 'wan switching' instead of stratacom.
As usual, pay special attention to anything that has been EOL for a couple
of years now ;-)
Here's a link for stuff that I used when I took the exam. It covered all of
the stuff I ran into on the exam.
http://cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/wanbu/8_5/switch/sys/sysmpt01.htm
As an alternative, Chapter 9 of Cisco WAN Quick Start (ISBN 157870104X)
summarizes all of that info in a mor
Robert Padjen wrote:
>
> Yes, my CID text does address the StrataCom, however,
> I recommend that readers augment this material with
> CCO. It appears that the test has altered a few
> questions since the last publication and it would be
> easiest to bolster the Cisco material as opposed to
> try
btw, this is a whitepaper on the BPX
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/bp8600/tech/bpx86_wp.htm
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=18528&t=18476
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupst
Yes, my CID text does address the StrataCom, however,
I recommend that readers augment this material with
CCO. It appears that the test has altered a few
questions since the last publication and it would be
easiest to bolster the Cisco material as opposed to
try and keep up with the errata for eac
I have heard that the Sybex DCN book by Robert Padjen has a section on
Stratacom.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mr. Oletu Hosea Godswill, CCNA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:28 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: CID Exam!!!--- - - Stratacom Switches [7
womdering when the beta CID exam will be officially launched
"Jeff Duchin" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Wanted feedback from those who have recently sat this exam and what they
> recommend for the following since the CID Cisco Press book doesn't really
> delve
Just passed this exam last week. No VPN,No Qos, Voip
nothing. All stuff covered in CID Cisco press book.
Only Stratacom stuff is not covered but it is more
thna enough in Robert Padjen CID book. Very poorly
worded exam and most of the questions didnt make much
sense to me. I just hung around and p
Hi, I just wrote the CID and passed. It was a bit difficult in that you
can't just memorize commands. I used the CID book and Boson tests. The exam
had very little in common with the Boson tests so don't rush out and buy
them!
I would put some extra attention to the design considerations and adva
Your book is fine, give it a fast read including the appendix. Not a lot of
design questions on the test. A good solid cross section of everything is on
the test. I took it on July 24th, 755 was passing at that time. Review SNA
and the Stratosphere line. Good luck
Phil
Message Posted at:
http:/
> Know your CCNP and CCDA stuff. Read the Cisco Press CID book. Find some
> stuff on Cisco.com on StratacomYou should be ready after that. I took
> the exam 4 weeks ago. It is tough but do-able.
> I'm currently preparing for the written. Ugh.. The
> http://www.cramsession.brainbuzz.com stuff i
Know your CCNP and CCDA stuff. Read the Cisco Press CID book. Find some
stuff on Cisco.com on StratacomYou should be ready after that. I took
the exam 4 weeks ago. It is tough but do-able.
I'm currently preparing for the written. Ugh.. The
http://www.cramsession.brainbuzz.com stuff is pretty g
Augment the Sybex book with Cisco Web information on
the StrataCom platforms - capabilities, protocols,
etc. It might be worth five-percent of your interests.
Otherwise, assuming that you've taken the CCNP and DCN
exams, it should give you everything you need.
--- "[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timothy Oue
StrataCom Switches YES!!!
Marakalas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi
> I'm writing the CID 640-025 exam on Monday. I want to
> know if the exam covers ATM and StrataCom Switches.
> Where should i concentrate on.
>
> Your valuable cont
Typically there seems to be a six month delay from the
end of a beta to the retirement of a test, but there
is no rule. The new CID test (beta) was very bad and I
hope Cisco takes some time to correct it before its
release. The old test was poor, but was at least
managable. Good luck.
--- PYF <[
]>
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: CID EXAM ALIVE AND WELL!!
> How come don't want to take the Beta exam instead?
>
>
> "Andre' Paree-Huff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 0160
gt;
>
> André Paree-Huff
> A+, ASE, CCDA, CCNP
> MCSE+I, NET+, I-NET+
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> AOL AIM: pareehuff
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Christopher J. Dosch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Andre' Paree-Huff" &l
ED]>; "Cisco@Groupstudy. Com"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 5:40 PM
Subject: RE: CID EXAM ALIVE AND WELL!!
> WOW, that's strange! I live in NO VA and I called yesterday, first
> Prometric and then Cisco, both representatives said no go on both
WOW, that's strange! I live in NO VA and I called yesterday, first
Prometric and then Cisco, both representatives said no go on both the beta
and the 3.0!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Andre' Paree-Huff
Sent: Thursday, Decemb
As Chuck has suggested. Read all questions carefully. This will be the
most obscure exam you will probably sit to date. Make sure you study hard
and give this exam more respect than any of the CCNP exams. Good luck.
P.S. you can go back so mark the dodgy questions and go back at the end.
--
Read all questions carefully. Don't be discouraged by the couple of
questions for which there is no right answer. Concentrate on protocol
behaviors as determined by Cisco - TCP, routing protocols, desktop - meaning
netbios and IPX, with maybe a smattering of Appletalk. Those three areas
cover 75%
I don't think that it's a question of "whatever a client wants to
support"..
It's more like, this stuff is out there in legacy systems and they use Cisco
stuff so you should know it if you bump into it.
That's why there's still a lot of Token Ring in the CCIE, not many implement
it for new n
Yup. Focus on the features that make these protocols
useful in modern networks, including newer routing
protocols...
--- "Pickett, Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> Just checking with those who have taken this exam to
> see if Appletalk and
> IPX are really covered on this exam..
CID Exam QuestionYeah, it's in there, IPX more than Apple.
Cisco wants to support what ever a client wants to transport, it's that old
"The customer is always right" thing.
Because of that philosophy, Cisco wants you, as a Cisco certified
professional, to be able to design a network that will supp
If you pass CID and DCN then you have a pretty good start towards the CCIE
written. Most of the written exam is conceptual, as opposed to knowing
commands and such. But i would suggest some intensive additional study b4
taking the written.
Richard Foltz, CCNP, CCDP, MCSE+I, Network+, A+
Technica
Studied CID course manual reviewed, highlighted and made notes (wrote down what I
highlighted) for 16-24 hours of total studying.
www.boson.com CID #1 & #2
Passed with: 69% (still passing score)
Passing score: 65% 100 questions 2 1/4 hours time limit
CID has the design and depth of protoco
Really, I got around 80%, but CID make me spent
almost 2 hours (compare with CMTD- 20 minutes and 990 got).
I used Cisco Network design & Case Studies- but during the exam I felt
it is quite weak to give you some conceptual facts on Token Ring and SNA,
in other questions I have had to refres ACRC
>I don't think this question asks anybody to violate the NDA. She is not
>asking for any specific details, only topics and test format. Cisco used
to
>put this information on their site in the form of "exam objectives", which
>they no longer do, but not for reasons of NDA violation.
Cisco still
.
Besides, I'd like to know the answer to her questions as well as I will be
taking this exam soon myself! ;-}
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Feliz, Edgar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 4:51 PM
To: Tara Porter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CID Exam?
Tara,
Tara,
The question you ask would violate the NDA. I can tell you that you should
prepare for everything. If you have taken the CID course the exam covers all
the subjects on that.
EF
-Original Message-
From: Tara Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 4:05 PM
To:
Robert's book? What is the title? By Robert
> who?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Healis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 12:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: CID exam
>
>
> I have to agree that this test is old,
What is Robert's book? What is the title? By Robert who?
-Original Message-
From: Jim Healis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CID exam
I have to agree that this test is old, and a bit ambiguous on many
questions
nior Network Engineer
wine.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Priscilla Oppenheimer
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 9:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CID exam
Will Cisco be rewriting the CID exam soon? I notice that the CCDP 2.0 list
Will Cisco be rewriting the CID exam soon? I notice that the CCDP 2.0 list
still includes CID 3.0 640-025.
The test is ancient, and many of the questions were written to certify
instructors. (I have inside information on this! ;-) Some of these
questions miss the mark for people who won't be teac
I think that most people fail to understand that the
CID exam is perhaps the most unique of the series.
There is no practicality, and, while I was
disappointed with the age of the exam, I thought that
it opened the door to the design world better than the
technical exams - routing, switching, etc.
Jim
I'll second Brad's opinion... the CID test was *very* ambigous on a few
questions... I think test writers create questions on certain subject areas
and they know what subject areas they are pulling from when writing it, but
you don't taking the test... I had one question that was completely,
that CID test sucks
-Brad Ellis
CCIE#5796
CCDP, CCNA, MCNE, MCSE
""Jim Healis"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Have you ever had one of those times where you took a test, marked a
> question because you weren't sure about it, and then chang
78 matches
Mail list logo