revalent to IOS ver?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73852t=73799
--
**Please support GroupStudy by purchasing from the GroupStudy Store:
http://shop.groupstudy.com
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Were the two T1's terminating at two differant ISP's? If so BGP
would be appropriate. If you have 2 T1's terminating at a single
ISP in
the same POP then no.
What would you do if they had been terminating at a single ISP in the
same POP? Or did you mean same router?
Most likely
Thanks, I appreciate your comments.
Zsombor
At 01:36 PM 6/23/2003 -0500, MADMAN wrote:
Were the two T1's terminating at two differant ISP's? If so BGP
would be appropriate. If you have 2 T1's terminating at a single ISP in
the same POP then no.
What would you do if they had been
one of many reasons that they use private addressing.
Priscilla
-Original Message-
From: nrf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon 14/10/2002 2:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2
routers eth [7:55522]
bergenpeak
.net
Re: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2 routers eth
[7:55457] (Mar 4, 9:46am)
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92)
To: bergenpeak , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2 routers eth
[7:55457]
Cc:
On Mar 4, 9:46am, bergenpeak
interfaces in
some
versions of the 12.1 code train.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feature_guide09186a0080087aeb.html#76875
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth) wrote:
.net
Re: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2 routers eth
[7:55457] (Mar 4
Lets make this discussion real. What major ISPs actually use 1918
addresses
on their physical interfaces?
I know ATT (7018) does not.
nrf wrote:
Symon Thurlow wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Well, I would view an ISP who uses 1918 addresses in their
Why, the biggest one of all - Worldcom.
bergenpeak wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Lets make this discussion real. What major ISPs actually use 1918
addresses
on their physical interfaces?
I know ATT (7018) does not.
nrf wrote:
Symon Thurlow wrote
Actually, now that I think about it, ATT also used to use a few RFC1918
addresses on their public Internet space as well, I think in Asia somewhere
(Japan?). But they might not do that anymore.
bergenpeak wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Lets make this
PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2 routers eth
[7:55522]
bergenpeak wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
One drawback with 1918 addresses on intermediate physical in
Message-
From: nrf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Mon 14/10/2002 2:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2
routers eth [7:55522]
bergenpeak wrote in message
[EMAIL
B.J. Wilson wrote:
Apply logic, not rules.
Priscilla, how would you like a very high management position
at EDS? Your
philosophy would be a breath of much-needed fresh air... ;-)
I would like that. My geeky husband pointed out that my statement better not
be a rule. If it is, then it
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: Re: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2
routers eth [7:55522]
bergenpeak wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
One drawback with 1918 addresses on inte
Symon Thurlow wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Well, I would view an ISP who uses 1918 addresses in their public network
a
little warily. Traceroute etc are pretty fundamental problem solving tools
IMHO
Well then I suppose that means you would be suspicious of
...
Yes but then you lose troubleshooting capabilities etc.
-Original Message-
From: nrf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 October 2002 01:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2 routers eth
[7:55480]
Or even better, just use unnumbered in
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 October 2002 01:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2 routers eth
[7:55480]
Or even better, just use unnumbered interfaces.
Bolton, Travis D [LTD] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:
bbfaye wrote:
That's what I confusing.
if I use /31s to the link address, it seems there's no address
for network
address and broadcast address in this subnet.
How could it work?
It's only used on point-to-point links. There's no need for a broadcast
address. If you want to send to
Apply logic, not rules.
Priscilla, how would you like a very high management position at EDS? Your
philosophy would be a breath of much-needed fresh air... ;-)
BJ
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55521t=55458
message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Yes but then you lose troubleshooting capabilities etc.
-Original Message-
From: nrf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 October 2002 01:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: can I use a /31 subnet to the link b
Yes but then you lose troubleshooting capabilities etc.
-Original Message-
From: nrf [mailto:noglikirf;hotmail.com]
Sent: 13 October 2002 01:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2 routers eth
[7:55480]
Or even better, just use unnumbered
Well, if you work it out:
Obviously the first three octets wil be all 1's, so if you look at the
last octet:
1110
Which = 254. This only leaves you with 2 addresses per subnet, and since
you need one address for the Network address and one for the Broadcast
address, you no longer have any
/31s are supported on FE and GE link types (as well as POS, etc.)
However,
cisco backed out support in some early versions of the 12.1 code train
(ie
it worked in some versions of 12.0, didn't work in some 12.1, and now
appears
to work again).
RFC 3021 provides details.
bbfaye wrote:
I
That's what I confusing.
if I use /31s to the link address, it seems there's no address for network
address and broadcast address in this subnet.
How could it work?
at 12 Oct 2002 15:10:36 - , [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bergenpeak)
wrote:
--
/31s are supported on FE and GE link types (as well as
At 1:53 PM + 10/12/02, bbfaye wrote:
I used thought it shoul be /30 mask subnet...
but recently I saw some guy said: use /31 subnet to save the address
I really confusing me...
Some newer IOS releases support /31 for point-to-point media. There
is an RFC describing the practice.
Symon,
Reference RFC 3021
Using 31-Bit Prefixes on IPv4 Point-to-Point Links
HTH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Symon Thurlow
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 7:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: can I use a /31 subnet
address 145.10.70.2 255.255.255.254
no ip directed-broadcast
!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
bbfaye
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 8:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2 routers eth
[7
Thanks!
I stand corrected.
Cheers,
Symon
-Original Message-
From: Bob McWhorter [mailto:bob;oregontrail.net]
Sent: 12 October 2002 17:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2 routers eth
[7:55460]
Symon,
Reference RFC 3021
Using 31-Bit
use a /31 subnet to the link between 2 routers eth
[7:55469]
Thanks!
I stand corrected.
Cheers,
Symon
-Original Message-
From: Bob McWhorter [mailto:bob;oregontrail.net]
Sent: 12 October 2002 17:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2
Message-
From: Symon Thurlow [mailto:sthurlow;webvein.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2002 4:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: can I use a /31 subnet to the link between 2 routers eth
[7:55469]
Thanks!
I stand corrected.
Cheers,
Symon
-Original Message-
From: Bob
If i'm reading your situation correctly you should be able to poll all
information. I'm not sure if each VLAN has an assigned IP address as in
MLS. If so I believe you should be able to poll each IP segment.
dovelet wrote:
Hi all,
I just setup vlan trunk at a fastethernet port of a Cisco
boot system tftp
Hi Group, Can anyone please explain to me what command syntax to
boot up a router using TFTP stftp c2500-jk8os-l.122-1d 172.16.0.1erver?
I can do a copy tftp flash, but when I tried to set up a boot system,
it keeps on failing to boot... Is this correct?? boot system
Hunt Lee wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi Group,
Can anyone please explain to me what command syntax to boot up a router
using TFTP stftp c2500-jk8os-l.122-1d 172.16.0.1erver?
I can do a copy tftp flash, but when I tried to set up a boot system, it
keeps on
I am preparing for my BCMSN exam on Wednesday. I have been using both Todd
Lammle's CCNP Switching Guide and the Cisco Lan Switching Book. I've also
been using the Boson practice exams. I've found Todd Lammle's book to be
especially good and a good compliment to the Lan Switching book as it
Shivjit Ji, Cisco Press books are the best for the preparation of Cisco
exams. Out of these, the text books are always better than the Exam
Preparation Guides. CCNP preparation guide consists of Exam Guides only and
hence are not better that individual BCMSN and BCRAN books. After completing
The libraries contain the exact books that you would buy individually (BSCN
BCMSN BCRAN CIT). It is just a marketing thing - one that will save you
lots of money.
However, BSCN is the only one of any of the CCNP course books that has labs
to follow. Too bad.
Shivjit Patil wrote:
Hi..I
Guides than the official course/curriculum, in
particular Remote Access.
Good Luck.
Elmer
- Original Message -
From: s vermill
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 6:36 PM
Subject: RE: books to use to study for CCNP exam [7:37818]
The libraries contain the exact books that you would buy
I personally used BCMSN and Cisco LAN Switching, the latter is a really
really really really good book!
Shivjit Patil wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi..I have just finished my BSCN examinations. I used the Cisco BSCN book
for the examination. I found that book
Well you need 2 routers with WIC cards then all you have to do is configure
it as a clockswitch. this url shows as a back to back config but it should
give you a good idea of what's involved. You need 2 routers if you plan on
doing this at home. 1 as the Data clock and the other the Data
Any 2600 with serial ports can act as a frame relay switch. Go to
www.cisco.com and search for 'configuring frame relay switching' and
you'll find all the configuration details.
HTH,
John
sam sneed 1/17/02 1:55:40 PM
I here there is a Cisco 2600 series router that can be used to simulate
a
Here is a snapshot of a 2600 running as a frame switch, you can do this with
pretty much any router with multiple serial interfaces. Go to
www.fatkid.com, they have some sample configs for frame relay switching on a
router. You can also do a lookup on CCO for it. If you have trouble let us
If I remember correctly, the last time I had to do this with a 6509 I used
115200 and it worked fine.
-Patrick
guest 2001 12/01/01 09:29PM
I found a doc about howto use xmodem to recover the image of cat50004000,it
says you can use the xmodem -s 38400 to download via console.And I also
found
If your FR cross several hops, that's in control of service provider and may
be you never know, you will need this to know what really the state of PVC.
Some backup strategies like backup interface, are based on the state of
interface to determine path selection. Routing may have their mechanism
I think you're missing something technically. I've also been missing it for
a good few months now. Some changes were carried out a while back, and since
that day, this newsgroup's threads are never formed properly, messages
marked as read do not work, etc, etc.
If I'd just visited the group I'd
Meant to say Messages Marked as Watched messages dont work
The rest stands
Gareth Hinton wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I think you're missing something technically. I've also been missing it
for
a good few months now. Some changes were carried out a while
you also need to configure no ip address under the BRI interface.
Brian Dennis wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Try using dialer pool 1 under the dialer interface and dialer
pool-member
1 under the BRI interface(s).
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS)(ISP/Dial) CCSI
If you are looking for the capability to physically power off
the routers remotely *and* use the terminal server, you may
want to investigate the use of an APC power switch. They
regularly sell on Ebay for under $300.
HTH,
Paul Werner
The only
thing that you can
NOT do with the
]]On Behalf Of
SilCam
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 4:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I can't use dialer 1 int to connect internet [7:9662]
you also need to configure no ip address under the BRI interface.
Brian Dennis wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].
Try using dialer pool 1 under the dialer interface and dialer pool-member
1 under the BRI interface(s).
Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (RS)(ISP/Dial) CCSI #98640
5G Networks, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
hwen
I am using a FE module out of a 2621 on a 2610 with no problems even though
Cisco config tools says you can't
D'Wayne Saunders
Senior MIS Operator
-Original Message-
From: mondo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 19 May 2001 15:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Can I use
Yes, you can.
But there is a case, ISL Trunking will not functon properly.
I do not know other feature will perform properly or not.
May be the new release of IOS will tackle this problem.
Just like wic-2T will not work for Cisco 3600 in 11.xx series, now it work
fine in 12.x.x series.
HTH
Appreciate your answers guys, even though some were conflicting.
It seems officially I am unable to do this, but some people have tried and
it seems to work for them.
Well here goes !
Regards
Rashid
Rashid Lohiya wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have been told
www.cisco.com
Check out the products and applicable cards.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rashid Lohiya
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 1:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040]
I have been told by a friend that
I don't believe you can use FA's.
http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Hardware:2600s=Hard
ware_Info#Modules
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Rashid Lohiya
To:
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 2:32 PM
Subject: Can I use FE in 2610 [7:5040]
I have been told by a friend
Watch the line wrap. According to that page there is no 10/100 Network
Module available for the 2600 series. The Fast Ethernet Network Modules
are available for the 3600 series. If you want Fast Ethernet in the
2600 series you need to have a 2620 or 2621.
HTH,
John
Rashid Lohiya 5/18/01
As you'll find out, there is no 10/100 network module for the 2600 series
router. If you want a 10/100 capable router, you'll need a 2620, 2621, 2650
or 2651 router.
-Rizzo
-Original Message-
From: Rashid Lohiya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 2:32 PM
To:
I tried using Cisco's configurator tool and it does not list any 10/100 add
on modules with a 2610. They are on the 2620s and up though. Hope this
helps.
Rashid Lohiya wrote in message ...
I have been told by a friend that I cannot use a FE 10/100 network module
in
my Cisco 2610.
Can someone
Hi
Well, don4t know with sniffer, but you can do it with your router
directly:
ipx sap 4 fs2 3BBB... 451 1
4 is type, fs2 is server name
Regards
Vincent wrote:
Hi;
To all sniffer expert, I would like to simulate IPX traffic in my pc, so
I can pratice IPX acces-list in
Hello there,
I think BCRAN and CIT are ok .
for BCSN you need to have the knowledge of ACRC ( check the exam outlines to
know what to read from this book ) you need know BGP .
for BCMSN you need to have the knowledge of CLSC ( check the exam outlines
to know what to read from this book )
I would think they would be valuable for the basics but check the objectives
for the new exams and get the proper materials for those new objectives not
covered in 1.0. This method could save you some $...
- Original Message -
From: "Alec Smiths" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to the Cisco upgrade planner yes all IOS images for the 2500
series will work on the 2501 through 2525
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
michael
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 4:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chuck,thank you very much!!!
On 22 Nov 2000 20:12:21 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Chuck Larrieu")
wrote:
According to the Cisco upgrade planner yes all IOS images for the 2500
series will work on the 2501 through 2525
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jack
From what I remember - SNAP and VC-Mux are two differnet encapsulations for
layer 3 protocols over ATM. I think VC-mux only allows one protocol/vc
while SNAP (because of the additional header) allows multiple layer 3
protocols/vc of course at an additional cost of the SNAP header which I
Hi Group,
Could you please light me up on the following comments:
"OSPF allows use of ATM VCmux encapsulation (so TCP acks fit in one ATM
cell);
IS-IS requires ATM SNAP encapsulation, forcing two-cell TCP acks (but Henk
Smit's NLPID hack fixes this)."
I have no clue what this means, please
with Europe.
Brian
Go Alternet!
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: IS-IS use??
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 17:59:01 -0500
"William Gragido" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
IS-IS
s very cool to learn this information from someone
with such a wealth of experience! I did not realize the difficulties we ran
into with Europe.
Brian
Go Alternet!
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Su
Don't get me wrong. There are definite times to use ISIS, there are
definite times to use OSPF, and there are times either will work just
fine.
Russ Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
IS-IS is considered more stable because you can manually set the refresh
time as far out as 18 + hours.
This is
Chuck, come on IS-IS is an "OPEN" standard. I am the total opposite to you
as to say I have no been without it in 2 companies that I have worked for.
As for when you should use it - to be honest I am hearing of more and more
businesses using it as people are starting to "think" that IS-IS is
on that?
Guilherme
-Original Message-
From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 9:03 AM
To: 'Chuck Church'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: IS-IS use??
Chuck, come on IS-IS is an "OPEN" standard. I am the total opposite to you
as to say I ha
IS-IS is used by a large percentage of 1st tier internet backbone providers. From
what I understand, it was chosen not for technical superiority over OSPF, but becuase
cisco's IS-IS code was more stable at the time. At present, IS-IS maintains a couple
advantages over OSPF in the ISP world.
makes easier to find people to
implement/support it
Any inputs on that?
Guilherme
-Original Message-
From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 9:03 AM
To: 'Chuck Church'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: IS-IS use??
Chuck, come on IS-
From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 9:03 AM
To: 'Chuck Church'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: IS-IS use??
Chuck, come on IS-IS is an "OPEN" standard. I am the total opposite to
you
as to say I have no been without it in 2
At 09:38 AM 11/16/00, Spolidoro, Guilherme wrote:
UUNet for example uses IS-IS on their core while the rest (or the majority)
of the ISPs use OSPF. I wonder why UUNet chosed for IS-IS instead of OSPF.
Maybe somebody on the list has an answer?
Today I would chose OSPF over IS-IS because:
- much
Well, I believe that Cisco's take on this is that OSPF does not scale as
well for very large networks as does IS-IS. At least so sayeth an
instructor SE that I happen to know.
Rik
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11/16/00 1:20 PM
Subject: RE
of the US
Government(ie Military), to accomadate its World Wide network.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rik Guyler
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 11:50 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: IS-IS use??
Well, I believe that Cisco's take
I am not familiar with the ISP enviroment at all.
When we say UUNet uses IS-IS on their core, do we mean that they
redistribute their BGP routes from their edge routers into IS-IS and
redistribute back into BGP and the far end edge routers?
Which means the edge routers are running BGP to learn
(CCIE
3xxx or so) agrees with.
I know absolutely nothing about IS-IS, so this is not my opinion, only a
repeat from those that know much more than me! ;-}
Rik
-Original Message-
From: William Gragido
To: 'Rik Guyler'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11/16/00 5:38 PM
Subject: RE: IS-IS use
use ATM would also use ATM to load balance traffic between links,
etc.
Does it help? :-)
Guilherme
-Original Message-
From: Jack Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IS-IS use??
I am not familiar with the ISP
Chuck, I think this is a good question. I always looked for comparisons
between IS-IS and OSPF and never really could find any good source (I mean,
Doyle describe both protocols very well, but that's not what I'm looking
for, I'm looking for large implementation descriptions, explaining
Jack Walker wrote,
Sorry for jumping into this.
I think I agree with Bob that IS-IS is more like something a service
provider should consider.
OSPF is sufficient for enterprise network, at least I think so, just imagine
a network with 3000 or more routers, how could we design a OSPF
At 09:38 AM 11/16/00, Spolidoro, Guilherme wrote:
UUNet for example uses IS-IS on their core while the rest (or the majority)
of the ISPs use OSPF. I wonder why UUNet chosed for IS-IS instead of OSPF.
Maybe somebody on the list has an answer?
Today I would chose OSPF over IS-IS because:
- much
Well, I believe that Cisco's take on this is that OSPF does not scale as
well for very large networks as does IS-IS. At least so sayeth an
instructor SE that I happen to know.
Rik
It depends on how you define "large." Neither will handle extremely
large networks. Truly large networks use
the aforementioned SE (CCIE
3xxx or so) agrees with.
I know absolutely nothing about IS-IS, so this is not my opinion, only a
repeat from those that know much more than me! ;-}
Rik
-Original Message-
From: William Gragido
To: 'Rik Guyler'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11/16/00 5:38 PM
Subject: RE: IS-IS use
ISP's use IGP's (be they OSPF or IS-IS) for internal reachability (IBGP peering is
generally done on loopbacks and these networks need to be advertised) and for next hop
resolution. Hence, all the perimeter BGP next hops will be advertised into the IGP so
that all IBGP speakers can properly
"William Gragido" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote,
IS-IS is most definetly still alive and kicking. The US military utilizes
it, and it works very well. OSPF is a different animal, and Rik, I would
disagree with your statement as to its scalability. IS-IS was designed to
provide complete non-vendor
: Peter Van Oene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Verzonden: donderdag 16 november 2000 23:58
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: IS-IS use??
ISP's use IGP's (be they OSPF or IS-IS) for internal reachability (IBGP
peering is generally done on loopbacks and these networks need to be
advertised
"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote:
The direct ancestor of IS-IS is DECnet Phase IV routing, principally
designed by Radia Perlman. DEC contributed its work to ISO, and
IS-IS was initially developed as a pure OSI routing protocol (i.e.,
for CLNP). IS-IS became the native IGP for DECnet Phase V,
Yes. When the router reboots, it will load and uncompress the image. I
don't know if the filename matters, but I used .MZ
The first time I tried it, it failed for some reason. It's worked each time
I tried since. The file might have been corrupted the first time, or the
compression failed or
A calculator??? For the CCNA test??? For what???
-B
""Pichi"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
8nbm3s$iul$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8nbm3s$iul$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I am taking the CCNA this afternoon and I would like to know if we are
able
to use the calculator??
Pedro
Silly - for counting how many questions there are, and calculating the
passing score! :-
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re
NOPE! Sorry :-)
-Original Message-
From: Pichi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 8:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can you use the calculator in tests?
I am taking the CCNA this afternoon and I would like to know if we are able
to use the calculator??
Probably no, because subneting questions really does not involve
complex calculations. You are only aloud a pen and peace of paper. You can
write anything on that paper before starting the test, if subneting is your
concern I advice you to write all important aspects of subneting/chart and
OSI,
]
Subject:RE: Can you use the calculator in tests?
Probably no, because subneting questions really does not involve
complex calculations. You are only aloud a pen and peace of paper. You can
write anything on that paper before starting the test, if subneting is your
concern I advice you
no calculator. here is how I remembered 2^n-2
for class c
2 6 14 30 62
62 30 14 6 2
one is backwards, one is forwards, top is # of subnets bottom is number
of hosts
class B is the same
just in powers of 2 to 16384(-2) for the subnets and the reverse 16384
to 2 for the hosts
if you know
ot; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Jorge Rodriguez" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "Pichi" [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: August 15, 2000 12:20 PM
Subject: RE: Can you use the calculator in tests?
Just so everyone knows, the last three times I have tested, I was
presented
with a useles
, 2000 10:30 AM
To: Chuck Larrieu; Jorge Rodriguez; Pichi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Can you use the calculator in tests?
no wonder you get higher scores than me!!! :-)
Seriously though, they gave you a "physical" four banger calculator??
doesn't happen in my normal tes
Hi thanks for the website it great, one question non of the interface have
ip address, which why they are down..how do know what ip addresses to
assign?
"Natasha" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Here is the site and it's still free
st 08, 2000 11:29 PM
Subject: Re: May I use your on-line routers...?
Here is the site and it's still free
http://www.r1r2.com/
Now what you need to do before telneting on is go to the site and get
the instructions.
Billy Monroe wrote:
Hello:
I need to practice urgently BGP, OSP
97 matches
Mail list logo
