Ok,
So I know there is a big difference in the cost and performance of
Cisco (even lower end models) and let say a netgear switch. But where
do the difference lay? I know that there are memory issues and back
plain differences in these 2 classes of switches. But how do I find out
what
the difference lay? I know that there are memory issues and back
plain differences in these 2 classes of switches. But how do I find out
what a lower cost switch will perform like. I was doing some bench
marking on a NetGear 100Mb switch, between a large file transfer off a
Win2k Server
Steven Aiello wrote:
Ok,
So I know there is a big difference in the cost and
performance of
Cisco (even lower end models) and let say a netgear switch.
But where
do the difference lay? I know that there are memory issues and
back
plain differences in these 2 classes of switches
Vs. Low cost switches -Whats the Diff ? [7:74987]
Steven Aiello wrote:
Ok,
So I know there is a big difference in the cost and
performance of
Cisco (even lower end models) and let say a netgear switch.
But where
do the difference lay? I know that there are memory issues and
back
Steven Aiello wrote in message ...
So I know there is a big difference in the cost and performance of
Cisco (even lower end models) and let say a netgear switch. But where
do the difference lay? I know that there are memory issues and back
plain differences in these 2 classes of switches
You can find information about configuring a 3750 here:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5023/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008017ed91.html
If your using a master and members of a cluster, you will only use one IP.
If your just configuring a management subnet, use
Hi Folks, Has anyone configured 3750 switches in a Stacking Mode? What I
understand that it creates a one virtual switch. 1) I have five 3750
switches, and I need to know if I will have to create five virtual
interfaces say for the managment. If I choose to go with VLAN 5 subnet
172.16.10.0/24
Survey says Ebay. We built our home lab for way under any of the other
packages (includes VOIP). 10 routers and 2 switches with remote access to do
labs from anywhere.
Good luck and happy shopping,
NT2
wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there,
Can you please advise any good resource
: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 10:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Superstitious Switches? [7:72746]
As far as I can tell there is no one definitive known reason but
several plausible reasons. I also understand some cultures like the
Chinese consider 13 lucky:)
Dave
Raj wrote:
Anybody knows when
Always use ports 7 and 14. They're lucky.
From: John Neiberger
Date: 2003/07/22 Tue PM 04:53:08 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Superstitious Switches? [7:72746]
This is not a joke, I promise, but it is very strange. Have any of you
noticed that by far the most problematic port
ebay?
/thomas
Hi there,
Can you please advise any good resource to buy
used/refurbished/cheap Cisco
gear?
Thanks.
Bharat
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72865t=72852
--
FAQ, list archives, and
There is a reason many hotels don't have a 13th floor;)
Dave
John Neiberger wrote:
This is not a joke, I promise, but it is very strange. Have any of you
noticed that by far the most problematic port on the Catalyst 2950 switches
is port 13?
I'd bet money that at least 20% of the time
of you
noticed that by far the most problematic port on the Catalyst 2950
switches
is port 13?
I'd bet money that at least 20% of the time we have a problem with a
device
connected to these switches they're connected to port 13. Just in the
last
two days we've had to troubleshoot *three
hotels don't have a 13th floor;)
Dave
John Neiberger wrote:
This is not a joke, I promise, but it is very strange. Have any of you
noticed that by far the most problematic port on the Catalyst 2950
switches
is port 13?
I'd bet money that at least 20% of the time we have
in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is a reason many hotels don't have a 13th floor;)
Dave
John Neiberger wrote:
This is not a joke, I promise, but it is very strange. Have any of you
noticed that by far the most problematic port on the Catalyst 2950
switches
is port 13?
I'd bet
:
This is not a joke, I promise, but it is very strange. Have any of you
noticed that by far the most problematic port on the Catalyst 2950
switches
is port 13?
I'd bet money that at least 20% of the time we have a problem with a
device
connected to these switches they're connected to port
in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is a reason many hotels don't have a 13th floor;)
Dave
John Neiberger wrote:
This is not a joke, I promise, but it is very strange. Have any of
you
noticed that by far the most problematic port on the Catalyst 2950
switches
on the Catalyst 2950
switches
is port 13?
I'd bet money that at least 20% of the time we have a problem with a
device
connected to these switches they're connected to port 13. Just in the
last
two days we've had to troubleshoot *three* separate instances of users
in
port 13
Hi there,
Can you please advise any good resource to buy used/refurbished/cheap Cisco
gear?
Thanks.
Bharat
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72852t=72852
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
www.ebay.com
wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there,
Can you please advise any good resource to buy used/refurbished/cheap
Cisco
gear?
Thanks.
Bharat
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=72859t=72852
This is not a joke, I promise, but it is very strange. Have any of you
noticed that by far the most problematic port on the Catalyst 2950 switches
is port 13?
I'd bet money that at least 20% of the time we have a problem with a device
connected to these switches they're connected to port 13. Just
Always use ports 7 and 14. They're lucky.
From: John Neiberger
Date: 2003/07/22 Tue PM 04:53:08 EDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Superstitious Switches? [7:72746]
This is not a joke, I promise, but it is very strange. Have any of you
noticed that by far the most problematic port
of the balance. Of course,
one needs to decide on the weight of a packet...
John Neiberger
John Neiberger wrote:
This is not a joke, I promise, but it is very strange. Have any of you
noticed that by far the most problematic port on the Catalyst 2950 switches
is port 13?
I'd bet money
of blade failures in various switches (from several
vendors including Extreme and Cisco). They have the earmarks of an
electrical problem, that is, supplied current spiking and valleying. For
instance, where I am located - Northern Virginia - we had some major storms
move through last night
PROTECTED]
Where the only idol is money and power, there is no hope for integrity.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:OT: electrical issues with switches [7:72151
Related to this question: Does Cisco put any kind of voltage protection on
the blades?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: electrical issues with switches [7:72151
, nor any of the PCs, always only
the interface cards in the switches (is this the case?), then it must be
something more specific than a surge on the power grid. I would think
however that if this (ie. that powering up connected PCs at the same time
can harm the switch) was a generic problem
(MAN-Corporate) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 2:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: electrical issues with switches [7:72151]
Related to this question: Does Cisco put any kind of voltage protection
on
the blades?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Original message
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 21:14:44 GMT
From: John Neiberger
Subject: Re: CSS Switches... [7:71292]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Herlocker, Tim 6/24/03 3:03:10 PM
Hi,
Just wondering if anybody has worked with the CSS 11000
switches at all.
We
are looking at purchasing one
I have a couple in production and ssl sticky does indeed work !!
Herlocker, Tim wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if anybody has worked with the CSS 11000 switches at all. We
are looking at purchasing one or two but would like to make sure SSL sticky
works on them first
Thanks in advance
Hi,
Just wondering if anybody has worked with the CSS 11000 switches at all. We
are looking at purchasing one or two but would like to make sure SSL sticky
works on them first
Thanks in advance!
- Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=71292t=71292
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Herlocker, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 1:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CSS Switches... [7:71292]
Hi,
Just wondering if anybody has worked with the CSS 11000 switches at all.
We are looking at purchasing one or two but would like to make sure SSL
sticky
Herlocker, Tim 6/24/03 3:03:10 PM
Hi,
Just wondering if anybody has worked with the CSS 11000 switches at all.
We
are looking at purchasing one or two but would like to make sure SSL
sticky
works on them first
Thanks in advance!
- Tim
We've been using them for a few years and haven't had
Used CSS11152's in datacenter with SSL. Worked good.
Herlocker, Tim wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Just wondering if anybody has worked with the CSS 11000 switches at all.
We
are looking at purchasing one or two but would like to make sure SSL
sticky
works on them first
Thanks Ross/Richard,
Some useful documents found with their search engine. I'll hopefully get to
try the suggestions out this week.
Regards,
Bikespace
Richard Botham wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bikespace,
Just spent a day testing exactly this...spooky
You're correct , Cisco's
Bikespace,
Just spent a day testing exactly this...spooky
You're correct , Cisco's cannot put a multicast mac in its arp cache
dynamically - BUT - you CAN put STATIC ARP entries in a Cisco pointing to a
multicast mac.( Even if Layer3 is unicast)
However there are some small perfomance points
Does anybody have used or refurbished 3550 SMI or EMI Switches for sale?
please
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=69563t=69563
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Have you checked on Stonebeat's site? They have a number of articles
relating to Cisco equipment and Stonebeat depending on the equipment involved.
In particular,
http://www.stonesoft.com/estone/support/knowledgebase/view.html?id=000475q=cisco
HTH
Bikespace wrote:
Hi All,
Anybody
Hi there,
I'm looking for CatOS commands that are equivalent to the IOS based commands
below:
Clear the CDP tableclear cdp table
Display CDP counters show cdp traffic
Reset CDP counters clear cdp counters
Moreover, is there an IOS command that is similar to show
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Looking for equivalent commands on IOS/CatOS
switches [7:65635]
Hi there,
I'm looking for CatOS commands that are equivalent to the IOS
based commands
below:
Clear the CDP tableclear cdp table
Display CDP counters show cdp traffic
switches. process
switching, fast switching, autonomous switching, distributed switching,
etc... are all the ways the packets are moved between interfaces on a
router. therefore both layer 2 and layer 3 'switch' irregardless of the name
on the chassis.
I personally view the sole distinction between
, whether we're talking about regular routers or L3 switches.
Correct for the Cisco product line. We do have some cases,
especially in the service providers, where we have things like Route
Servers. These speak BGP and manipulate and readvertise routing
information, but have zero forwarding
, whether we're talking about regular routers or L3 switches. process
switching, fast switching, autonomous switching, distributed switching,
etc... are all the ways the packets are moved between interfaces on a
router. therefore both layer 2 and layer 3 'switch' irregardless of the name
there's one more contribution. For those of you that
insist switches route in hardware, and routers route in software, I'd
challenge you to look, in detail, at the hardware used.
Believe it or not, an ASIC of the level of sophistication that can do
forwarding is, in fact, a specialized
switches as they have an all ASIC forwarding
plane and therefore route in hardware.
thats the easiest way to look at them. it has gaps, but once you get the big
picture you can then start to talk about the specifics.
probably the biggest thing that a layer 3 switch can't do (unless its
changed recently
small network, say 2 VLANs, you can
opt for the router-on-a-stick method. Or better yet, use a router with
dual ethernets or fastethernets. However, if you're supporting 4,5, or more
networks, that's what L-3 and multi-layer switches are for.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form
, that's what L-3 and multi-layer switches are for.
Peter, would you agree that when someone says that's what layer3 and
multilayer switches are for, they are really talking about router
packaging (as oppposed to fundamentally different technology) that creates
platforms with certain port densities
network.
Anyway, if you only have a relatively small network, say 2 VLANs, you can
opt for the router-on-a-stick method. Or better yet, use a router with
dual ethernets or fastethernets. However, if you're supporting 4,5, or more
networks, that's what L-3 and multi-layer switches are for.
Peter
Hi ...
We have switches that operate at Layer 3..right..
My Question is when we have Routers that are good enough why do we need
switches at layer3?
Under what circumtances do we use switches instead of routers?
Hope I made Myself Clear...Thanks in Advance!!!
Regards...
Nanda
Message Posted
In the enterprise, I can vlan a building into seperate lans, route between
them and connect all the users with the same box..Thats one reason for layer
3
switches..
With the inclusion of the switching module in the 3745 router box,
it now kinda blurs the difference between routers and switches
, if you're supporting 4,5, or more
networks, that's what L-3 and multi-layer switches are for.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=65221t=65215
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
every other kind of protocol also. I suppose since
we saw the death of bridges due to switches, we'll also see the death of
routers to L3-switch.
scott
nanda wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi ...
We have switches that operate at Layer 3..right..
My Question is when we have Routers
and IP being the
most popular won out. thats not to say that one day they won't have made
enough chipsets to route every other kind of protocol also. I suppose
since
we saw the death of bridges due to switches, we'll also see the death of
routers to L3-switch.
scott
nanda wrote in message
-time 4
Spantree-template 1 hello-time 1
Spantree-template 1 max-age 6
ip address 173.23.1.150 255.255.255.0
All interface (10basteT) says
no spantree start-forwarding
Each server has dual NIC cards which is connected to two switches in this
fashion.
NIC 1 goes to Switch A --port 1
NIC 2 goes
I presume you've configured one of them as a vtp server, while the other as
a vtp client? Likewise, they should both have the same vtp domain name.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64156t=63937
--
FAQ, list archives,
: suaveguru
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 11:37 PM
Subject: two 1900 catalyst switches cannot exchange
VLAN
info even [7:63613]
all,
I have 2 cisco catalyst 1900 switches with VLANS
configured on it when I tried to enable trunking
on
both of the trunk ports and make
to get all the bells and whistles you need to run Enterprise
version of 1900 operating cose.
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: suaveguru
To: Larry Letterman ;
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: two 1900 catalyst switches
, February 26, 2003 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: two 1900 catalyst switches cannot
exchange VLAN
info even [7:63836]
not sure , you mean the code version do play a
part?
So if it does play a part what code version should
I
run ?
regards,
suaveguru
--- Larry Letterman wrote:
what
what version of 1900 code are they running.?
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
- Original Message -
From: suaveguru
To:
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 11:37 PM
Subject: two 1900 catalyst switches cannot exchange VLAN
info even [7:63613]
all,
I have 2 cisco catalyst
all,
I have 2 cisco catalyst 1900 switches with VLANS
configured on it when I tried to enable trunking on
both of the trunk ports and make the two catalyst 1900
switched run VTP vlans information just can't travel
across the switches, appreciate if anyone with similar
problems tell me what to do
suaveguru wrote:
all,
I have 2 cisco catalyst 1900 switches with VLANS
configured on it when I tried to enable trunking on
both of the trunk ports and make the two catalyst 1900
switched run VTP vlans information just can't travel
across the switches, appreciate if anyone with similar
Don't you have to running the Enterprise version of the software for VTP to
work??
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 February 2003 21:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: two 1900 catalyst switches cannot exchange VLAN in
[7:63613
indeed with L3 switching, we can more closely arrive at wire speed, but in
the course of my practice, i seen L3 switches mainly interconnecting Lan's,
yes a flexwan modul exists to interconnect wan's on the same box but usually
we like to separate the lan's from wans for the sack of issolation
switches often use
different hardware implementations than WAN-oriented routers, but
this is a cost engineeering decision. Indeed, cost is more important
than speed on SOHO and branch office routers, which require a
different set of optimizations.
Are we saying that routers intended to deal
At 12:22 PM 2/15/2003 +, Juntao wrote:
indeed with L3 switching, we can more closely arrive at wire speed, but in
the course of my practice, i seen L3 switches mainly interconnecting Lan's,
yes a flexwan modul exists to interconnect wan's on the same box but usually
we like to separate
Peter van Oene wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
At 12:22 PM 2/15/2003 +, Juntao wrote:
indeed with L3 switching, we can more closely arrive at wire speed, but
in
the course of my practice, i seen L3 switches mainly interconnecting
Lan's,
yes a flexw
Hi Guys...
We have Layer3 Switches and routers...In what scenario one would ideally use
Layer3 switches over routers..
Do They have any significant advantage over using routers
Why do they have layer3 switches when we have routers are good enough to do
the job...
I am confused...I wud
Switches [7:63072]
Hi Guys...
We have Layer3 Switches and routers...In what scenario one
would ideally use
Layer3 switches over routers..
Do They have any significant advantage over using
routers
Why do they have layer3 switches when we have routers are
good enough to do
the job...
I am
hallo,
I have a q regarding switches.
Does any interf have a separate MAC address ?
Is there a diff betw managed / unmanaged switches
regarding mac addrsses and interfaces ?
thanks
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
Every port on a Layer 2 switch has its own MAC address, per IEEE 802.1D.
ira wrote:
hallo,
I have a q regarding switches.
Does any interf have a separate MAC address ?
Is there a diff betw managed / unmanaged switches
Those are marketing terms. You have to get the tech specs to know what
on this.
regds
Hitesh
-Original Message-
From: Vicuna, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 7:45 AM
To: Hitesh Pathak R
Subject: RE: Catalyst 6xxx switches and 2 firewall in clust [7:60235]
Importance: High
Hi Hitesh,
I am curious to find out your solution
Yes, you can [and should] do that [put static cam entry on the trunk
ports of sw2]. In fact, if you add an _additional_ firewall-- or for
better redundancy Dear Group,
Need your help in setting up the following :-
SETUP :- There are 2 core switches SW1 Sw2 (connected back to back
inline text for answers.
regds
Hitesh
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 4:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Catalyst 6xxx switches and 2 firewall in clust
[7:60235]
Can you help us understand
am doing is right or not.
2) As a I told in my mail that the back-2-back link between both my core
switches is a trunk and 2 ports are channeled together. In this case which
port should I bind the cam entry with ?? (supervisor port 1/1 or 1/2 ). Also
both my FireWall's are part of one Vlan and as u
Pls see inline text for answers.
regds
Hitesh
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 4:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Catalyst 6xxx switches and 2 firewall in clust [7:60235]
Can you help us understand
Dear Group,
Need your help in setting up the following :-
SETUP :- There are 2 core switches SW1 Sw2 (connected back to back with
both
the SUP GE ports Fiber uplink (Channeld and trunk). On one of the switch
(SW1)
I have 2 firewalls connected in cluster mode. For this clustered firewall I
have
Hitesh Pathak R wrote:
Dear Group,
Need your help in setting up the following :-
SETUP :- There are 2 core switches SW1 Sw2 (connected back to back with
both
the SUP GE ports Fiber uplink (Channeld and trunk). On one of the switch
(SW1)
I have 2 firewalls connected in cluster mode
Can you help us understand the situation better? Thanks.
See some questions inline.
l0stbyte wrote:
Hitesh Pathak R wrote:
Dear Group,
Need your help in setting up the following :-
SETUP :- There are 2 core switches SW1 Sw2 (connected back
to back with
both
the SUP GE ports
help in setting up the following :-
SETUP :- There are 2 core switches SW1 Sw2 (connected back
to back with
both
the SUP GE ports Fiber uplink (Channeld and trunk). On one of
the switch
(SW1)
I have 2 firewalls connected in cluster mode. For this
clustered
firewall I
have
multicasts. Routers don't normally do that so
they must have been misconfigured in some way.
You have switches and your firewalls are only connected to one of the
switches, isn't that so? I think your topology is completely different.
In that URL, every packet was arriving at the firewall a couple
Hi All
I'm after some ideas on how I should configure the network to allow me to
manage some Cat6k's which provide connectivity for internet and intranet
based equipment. I don't want routing on the switches as this may bypass the
firewalls, and I don't want the switches on the same VLAN
Folks I have two 2924 switches I am selling, these are great switches for
learning the basics or testing. If you do not need them for your cert needs
they are workhorses for a small network.
Catalyst 2924C-XL-EN22 10/100TX ports 2 10/100FX ports
Catalyst 2924-XL22 10
There is a much improved version of the Cisco TACACS daemon
on http://www.gazi.edu.tr/tacacs/ which is what everyone
I know of is running... YMMV
Oliver
mike greenberg sagte:
If you are good with unix/linux, download the freeware source code from
cisco website and use it. It's free. I use
Any sugestion for free Tacacs server ?
Thanks
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=57074t=57074
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
If you are good with unix/linux, download the freeware source code from
cisco website and use it. It's free. I use freeRadius running on
linux which works great.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Any sugestion for free Tacacs server ?
Thanks
Do you Yahoo!?
U2 on LAUNCH - Exclusive medley videos from
that
it happens at sites we change to cisco switches. I have enabled portfast on
all the switchports that are used for workstation access. This has
alleviated some of the problems with laptop users, but others still have
difficulty. Most users are using Dell laptops with Xircom network/modem
combo card
Have you tried a different NIC?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 8:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco switches and laptops [7:56731]
I was wondering if anyone has experienced the same issues as we
Barry,
not sure what you mean with 'it won't let go of their ip address from the
last site they were at', but maybe this helps you:
Troubleshooting Cisco Catalyst Switches to NIC Compatibility Issues
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/46.html
Regards
Reinhold
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 02
I have a bunch of IBM SX GBIC's for sale i anyone is interested for use in
your labs. I have tested these in several 3500 XL series switches as well as
in a 6500 and they work fine.
Selling them for $25 each plus shipping. Simple inexpensive way to use Gig E
in your home lab.
I do not believe
I can vouch for the IBM GBICs working in the 3550 switches as well.
TTFN,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Tim Medley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 7:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: FS IBM SX GBIC's work fine with Cisco 3500 series switches
[7:54929
I have a customer who has (1) 6509 backbone switches which is also acting
as a root bridge. (7) 3524 are connect back to 6509 via fiber each as a
seperate unit. At this point, if 6509 fails whole network will go down. I
suggested to have an additional switch run in standby mode as a backup
interesting question - a thought or two in line
Azhar Teza wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have a customer who has (1) 6509 backbone switches which is also acting
as a root bridge. (7) 3524 are connect back to 6509 via fiber each as a
seper
Azhar Teza wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I have a customer who has (1) 6509 backbone switches which is also acting
as a root bridge. (7) 3524 are connect back to 6509 via fiber each as a
seperate unit. At this point, if 6509 fails whole network will
www.troubleshootingnetworks.com
www.priscilla.com
Azhar Teza wrote:
I have a customer who has (1) 6509 backbone switches which is
also acting as a root bridge. (7) 3524 are connect back to
6509 via fiber each as a seperate unit. At this point, if 6509
fails whole network will go down. I suggested to have
If I take 4 Catalyst 3500 Series Switches and configure in a GigabitStack
Module then I would assume that I am creating a one virtual switch and all
the backplanes of the switches should combine the total speed of switching
backplane. Am I correct or it is a samething you are connecting two
A few people, along with myself, had been wondering about the 4500 series
switches. Here is part of an email I just received.
**New Catalyst 4500 Series Modular Switches and Supervisor IV**
Integrated Resiliency for Advanced Control of Converged Networks
Cisco is pleased to externally announce
Hi all,
I am putting my cisco home lab online just rise some fund for my second
attempt.
It consists of
1x Cisco 3620
1x Cisco 2621
1x Cisco 2520 ? ( configured as frame-relay switch)
1x Cisco 2514
5 x Cisco 2501
1 x Catalyst 4003
The rent on this will be $20
hi,
i couldnt find any addresses or infirmation about which switches are CLI
swtches or which are IOS command based. Can anyone give me information about
CLI switch series? i only know that catalsyt 4000, 5000, 6000 series and
2948G and 2980G series are CLI command-based.
Metin
Message
I put together a breakdown of which switches have which CLI, and a sample
configuration of each. You'll find it at www.laganiere.net
I hope you find it useful...
--- Dennis
- Original Message -
From: Metin Pasaoglu
To:
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 5:15 AM
Subject: which switch
I have the following router/Switch/Firewall for sale in UAE.
Cisco 2509
Cisco 2502
Cisco 1601
Cisco 1720
PIX Firewall 501
Catalyst Switch
Wic-1T
Wic-2T
All the above equipment has been upgraded with enough DRAM/Flash for all the
IOS flavours. Even all the cables required for back to back
1 - 100 of 500 matches
Mail list logo
