Re: [logging] ECL: Log interface vs. abstract class

2004-12-21 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
Ceki =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FClc=FC?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: all the attempts made at bridging X.25 and TCP/IP, both well defined and stable protocols, have failed miserably, even if both stacks supposedly fit into layers 1-4 of the 7 layer OSI network model. But X.25 and TCP/IP use two

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the question i pose is: are we trying for a JCL 2.0 which in my mind would be a compatible evolution of JCL 1.0 aiming to solve all the major JCL 1.0 itches or are we aiming for a JCL 1.1 (better discover and factoring) plus additional pluggable

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32743] - [betwixt] Adding DEBUG to log4j.properties results in IndexOutOfBoundsException

2004-12-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32743. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[GUMP@brutus]: Project commons-id (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

2004-12-21 Thread Adam Jack
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

[id] Gump build failure

2004-12-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, if you look into the CLASSPATH set by Gump, you'll see that ant.jar is present. But still javac doesn't find the Ant packages. I think this happens because Gump uses Maven to build id and project.xml doesn't include a dependency on Ant - so Maven ignores ant.jar. Would you prefer Gump to

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/id project.xml

2004-12-21 Thread brett
brett 2004/12/21 02:20:35 Modified:id project.xml Log: add a missing ant dependency. use 1.5.3-1 as no higher is required for the API and it is more likely to be present in a Maven env Revision ChangesPath 1.13 +5 -0

Re: [id] Gump build failure

2004-12-21 Thread Brett Porter
This isn't just in gump: maven java:compile fails in CVS. It strikes me that the project.xml file should declare an ant dependency. I've added it - if this was out of line, please feel free to roll it back. - Brett Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, if you look into the CLASSPATH set by Gump, you'll see

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 20 Dec 2004, at 23:13, Tim O'Brien wrote: Robert, we've got some issues to work through and infrastructure wants to wait until at least next week. Don't delay anything on account of the svn migration. From what I see, the transition should be seemless - just a few hours downtime. So,

Re: [logging] ECL: Log interface vs. abstract class

2004-12-21 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Henning, Thank you for sharing your mind. You have the right to pooh-pooh my opinions as much I have the right to express them. I still happen to think that the X.25 TCP/IP analogy bears relevance to the discussion. The fact that a simple analogy was sufficient to push your

Re: [id] Gump build failure

2004-12-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This isn't just in gump: maven java:compile fails in CVS. That's what I expected, but didn't check since I don't have Maven installed. I assumed that whoever worked on [id] was using Ant and thus was likely to forget changing the

[GUMP@brutus]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl (in module jelly-tags) failed

2004-12-21 Thread Morgan Delagrange
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 12:01 AM 12/21/2004, robert burrell donkin wrote: exactly (and that was the intended joke) I know. My response was intended for the rest of the group. ISTM it hasn't really started out so political this time (or did i miss it...) My comment about political vs. technical considerations was

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/jelly/jelly-tags/jsl build.xml

2004-12-21 Thread brett
brett 2004/12/21 03:08:08 Modified:jelly/jelly-tags/jsl build.xml Log: regenerate build file to see if this helps gump in the interim will switch to Maven gump definitions later Revision ChangesPath 1.6 +65 -61jakarta-commons/jelly/jelly-tags/jsl/build.xml

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/jelly/jelly-tags/jsl build.xml

2004-12-21 Thread Brett Porter
sorry, I've just realised that gump is actually giving dom4j 1.4 instead of 1.5 and is probably the problem. I had assumed it to be the other way around. - Brett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: brett 2004/12/21 03:08:08 Modified:jelly/jelly-tags/jsl build.xml Log: regenerate build file to

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/jelly/jelly-tags/jsl build.xml

2004-12-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sorry, I've just realised that gump is actually giving dom4j Should be dom4j's CVS HEAD. Or better would be. commons-jelly depends on packaged-dom4j which is dom4j 1.4 - and all jelly tag libs inherit from there. I'd be game to

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/jelly/jelly-tags/jsl build.xml

2004-12-21 Thread Brett Porter
Thanks - I was about to go looking for that. All of Jelly uses dom4j 1.5, so there should be no harm in this. *crosses fingers, toes, knocks on wood, etc.* - Brett Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sorry, I've just realised that gump is actually

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager.java

2004-12-21 Thread olegk
olegk 2004/12/21 03:27:55 Modified:httpclient/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager.java Log: Fixed a whole bunch of typos Contributed by Ernst de Haan ernst.dehaan at nl.wanadoo.com Revision ChangesPath

Re: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Matt Sgarlata
Chris Lambrou wrote: Matt Sgarlata wrote: Does this mean .NET doesn't have reflection? That's such a killer feature of Java; I can't believe they wouldn't have ported it to .NET. Any .NET developers out there that can tell us how .NET deals with reflection when you have multiple versions of

AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Daniel Florey
In order to find an appropriate solution to this issue, I'd like to identify the different problems that we need to address. Version: What does a version number mean? I'll make a proposal for how to use minor/major version number to have a basis on which we can identify the issues. Major version

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 21 Dec 2004, at 08:07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the question i pose is: are we trying for a JCL 2.0 which in my mind would be a compatible evolution of JCL 1.0 aiming to solve all the major JCL 1.0 itches or are we aiming for a JCL 1.1

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 18 Dec 2004, at 23:07, Scott Deboy wrote: Enter and exit should not be defined as severities. This is useful information, but orthogonal to a logging event's severity attribute. One way to provide entry/exit information is to overload the logger methods to take a map, and require the user

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread Matt Sgarlata
robert burrell donkin wrote: On 18 Dec 2004, at 23:07, Scott Deboy wrote: Enter and exit should not be defined as severities. This is useful information, but orthogonal to a logging event's severity attribute. Good point. I think this would be an excellent distinction for a logging

Re: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Matt Sgarlata
Daniel Florey wrote: In order to find an appropriate solution to this issue, I'd like to identify the different problems that we need to address. Version: What does a version number mean? I'll make a proposal for how to use minor/major version number to have a basis on which we can identify the

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 21 Dec 2004, at 08:07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the question i pose is: are we trying for a JCL 2.0 which in my mind would be a compatible evolution of JCL 1.0 aiming to solve all the

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread David Graham
--- Matt Sgarlata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Graham wrote: --- Daniel Florey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BTW: Another advantage of this approach would be that imports would indicate which version of the component is in use. I had a lot of trouble to find out, which version of jdom

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 10:31 PM 12/20/2004, robert burrell donkin wrote: IIRC we're never really gone for official consultations here at apache (or at least the bits i've been involved with): too much committee, too little community. i alerted ceki (who i've know and respected for too many years even though we

Re: [id] Gump build failure

2004-12-21 Thread Phil Steitz
Brett Porter wrote: This isn't just in gump: maven java:compile fails in CVS. It strikes me that the project.xml file should declare an ant dependency. I've added it - if this was out of line, please feel free to roll it back. Yes, we need the dependency -- there was a custom Ant task recently

RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread Scott Deboy
Semantic methods (other than severity) belong somewhere other than Log. Entry and exit (and other to-be-determined semantic methods) can be supported right now without changing commons-logging at all, by passing in a POJO or Map in as the event's message and relying on the enterprise logging

Re: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 09:11:55 -0500, Matt Sgarlata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Florey wrote: I'd prefer to keep the jar naming as introducing assembly would cause some confusion. If anyone would be interested I could put a simple proposal to the sandbox. Good point, JAR may be a

Re: [id] Gump build failure

2004-12-21 Thread Rory Winston
That's my bad. I added an Ant task in there to generate UUIDs, amd I forgot to check in the updated dependencies to CVS.I've also been travelling, and hence missed the gump complaints on the list. Thanks Stefan and Brett for sotring this out. Jakarta Commons Developers List

Submission: Commons IO GetFreeSpace

2004-12-21 Thread fzlists
Please download package at http://www.omnytex.com/commons-io-getfreespace.zip I submit this here for consideration of being added to Commons IO. If this should be directed elsewhere, I would appreciate that information. Thanks for your time! Synopsis A common question I've seen

RE: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Eric Pugh
I have to jump into this as well. I hope I am not just repeating what wiser minds have already said :-). The idea of changing package names just seems like a solution that looks simple, but will rapidly become a nightmare. As far as I know, no other set of libraries follow this pattern,

Re: [logging] ECL: pluggable message resolution

2004-12-21 Thread Richard Sitze
robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/20/2004 02:51:17 PM: snip/ ... how do you propose to reconcile this pluggable mechanism with the underlying logger that DOES accept MSGID and Object[] directly? I'm of the opinion that IF a reasonable proposal can be produced, then

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread Richard Sitze
[mutters something about keeping OUR troups in line..] robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/20/2004 04:03:28 PM: On 18 Dec 2004, at 20:52, Curt Arnold wrote: On Dec 18, 2004, at 12:24 PM, Richard Sitze wrote: snip That a single log request can be rendered for more than

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread Richard Sitze
news [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/21/2004 08:04:09 AM: robert burrell donkin wrote: On 18 Dec 2004, at 23:07, Scott Deboy wrote: Enter and exit should not be defined as severities. This is useful information, but orthogonal to a logging event's severity attribute. Good point. I

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread Richard Sitze
Regarding coding, I do have someone here who is champing at the bit to start submitting code to me, for checkin. Not to say others cannot, just that before you put any of your own time into this, know that there are other resources being made available. I do think we can start teasing some

[configuration] Cut timestamped version of configuration?

2004-12-21 Thread Eric Pugh
Hi all, I noticed that there is a directory (can't quite remember now) on the cvs.apache.org where timestamp/non official releases are put. This directory is NOT synced to ibiblio. I'd like to cut a timestamped version and put it there because I would like to add to Fulcrum configuration a

Re: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Daniel Florey wrote: In order to find an appropriate solution to this issue, I'd like to identify the different problems that we need to address. Version: What does a version number mean? I'll make a proposal for how to use minor/major version number to have a basis on which we can identify the

Re: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Craig McClanahan
Don't you get to this same result by creating your own URLClassLoader for each assembly, with its own set of JARs and/or directories making up its class path? Craig On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 07:03:50 -0500, Matt Sgarlata [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Lambrou wrote: Matt Sgarlata wrote: Does

AW: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Daniel Florey
snip/ an application using 1.x.b will work with component 1.x.a Does this sound reasonable? Missed something? Have you seen the guidelines in use by the Apache APR project? It looks to me like you're basically advocating the same system they have in place. It might save us hassle to

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 21 Dec 2004, at 15:05, Ceki Gülcü wrote: At 10:31 PM 12/20/2004, robert burrell donkin wrote: IIRC we're never really gone for official consultations here at apache (or at least the bits i've been involved with): too much committee, too little community. i alerted ceki (who i've know and

Re: Jakarta Commons Structure rehashed

2004-12-21 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 19 Dec 2004, at 03:50, Henri Yandell wrote: Do we want to clean the sandbox up before an svn migration? for the sake of component history (though a sandbox spring clean would be attractive) it'd probably be better to move to subversion first. - robert

Re: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Matt Sgarlata
Craig McClanahan wrote: Don't you get to this same result by creating your own URLClassLoader for each assembly, with its own set of JARs and/or directories making up its class path? Haha, yes you probably do get the same result! I for one just didn't understand what this type of a solution

[logging] roadmap? [WAS Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?]

2004-12-21 Thread robert burrell donkin
(shifting towards a more appropriate subject) On 21 Dec 2004, at 14:19, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 21 Dec 2004, at 08:07, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: the question i pose is: are we trying

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 21 Dec 2004, at 14:04, Matt Sgarlata wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: snip richard's proposal to add symantic methods (rather than severities) is therefore interesting. exit and entry tracing is common. at the moment, this works rather poorly when JCP is used with log4j: most people log

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Matt Sgarlata
Count me in! I'm planning on taking some time off for the holidays, so that should give me time to play around with this :) Matt Daniel Florey wrote: snip/ an application using 1.x.b will work with component 1.x.a Does this sound reasonable? Missed something? Have you seen the guidelines in use

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread Matt Sgarlata
Comments below... robert burrell donkin wrote: On 21 Dec 2004, at 14:04, Matt Sgarlata wrote: robert burrell donkin wrote: snip richard's proposal to add symantic methods (rather than severities) is therefore interesting. exit and entry tracing is common. at the moment, this works rather poorly

RE: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Sharples, Colin
And, in my experience watching work done with tools like Gump, any time people do weird trickery with package names, like Sun renaming some packages from x.y.z to com.sun.x.y.z, this inevitably seems to cause lots of problems somewhere down the line. Exactly. Remember the howls of

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread Matt Sgarlata
Richard Sitze wrote: news [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/21/2004 08:04:09 AM: +1, I agree with you and Ceki. TRACE is debatable (I personally like it), more than TRACE is silly. Well... call them what you will, I want em'!! lol Does this mean you want all 42 logging levels I described in my

Re: [configuration] Cut timestamped version of configuration?

2004-12-21 Thread Brett Porter
Hi Eric, You'll find the apropriate Maven settings in maven-plugins/plugin-parent/project.properties (I know you know where that is :) maven -Dmaven.repo.list=apachecvs jar:deploy-snapshot should then do the trick. As this is effectively a nightly build, I don't think there is any reason to

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 07:51 PM 12/21/2004, robert burrell donkin wrote: now it's getting political :( Your comments about the optionality of consultations elicited my political response. Many ASF members were involved with Apache at one point or another. Moreover, Jakarta has quite a few influential, I

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Craig McClanahan
Don't forget to do a little light reading first :-) Mechanism to declare dependencies in a MANIFEST.MF File: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/extensions/versioning.html ClassLoader implementation for representing an Assembly:

Re: Jakarta Commons Structure rehashed

2004-12-21 Thread Henri Yandell
Makes sense and I noticed that Tim's said that in the proposal so I rescind the suggestion. Hen On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 19:27:42 +, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19 Dec 2004, at 03:50, Henri Yandell wrote: Do we want to clean the sandbox up before an svn migration?

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Daniel Florey
Thanks for the links. Do you know if there is a maven task to automatically generate this manifest entries based on the project.xml? If not this might be a first step in order to allow easy adoption for the upcoming assembly-component ;-) -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31017] - [daemon] jsvc-src AUToCONF Bug

2004-12-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31017. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:51:56 +0100, Daniel Florey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the links. Do you know if there is a maven task to automatically generate this manifest entries based on the project.xml? If not this might be a first step in order to allow easy adoption for the upcoming

Re: Jakarta Commons Structure rehashed

2004-12-21 Thread Paul Libbrecht
On 19 Dec 2004, at 03:50, Henri Yandell wrote: Do we want to clean the sandbox up before an svn migration? I'd also rather do it after svn migration. Subversion, precisely, allows a better clean-up than cvs! We'd jump on the first svn advantage as soon as we'd get in! paul

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/vfs/src/test/org/apache/commons/vfs/test ProviderWriteTests.java

2004-12-21 Thread imario
imario 2004/12/21 13:54:33 Modified:vfs/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/provider AbstractFileObject.java DefaultFileContent.java vfs/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/impl DefaultFileSystemManager.java

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/vfs/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/provider/ftp FtpClientFactory.java FtpFileSystemConfigBuilder.java

2004-12-21 Thread imario
imario 2004/12/21 13:55:41 Modified:vfs/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/provider/ftp FtpClientFactory.java FtpFileSystemConfigBuilder.java Log: passiveMode configuration Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +7 -1

cvs commit: jakarta-commons-sandbox/vfs/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/provider FileContentThreadData.java

2004-12-21 Thread imario
imario 2004/12/21 13:57:18 Modified:vfs/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/provider FileContentThreadData.java Log: added license Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +18 -0

Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?

2004-12-21 Thread Richard Sitze
news [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/21/2004 02:01:07 PM: snip/ And yes, I'm leaning towards EXPLICITLY naming methods to encourage best practices. To use the distinction made by Curt, I'm pushing the trace level methods towards diagnostic logger function, and stepping away from

Re: [configuration] Cut timestamped version of configuration?

2004-12-21 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
Eric Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi all, I noticed that there is a directory (can't quite remember now) on the cvs.apache.org where timestamp/non official releases are put. This directory is NOT synced to ibiblio. I'd like to cut a timestamped version and put it there because I would like

Re: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Oliver Zeigermann
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 08:58:13 +1300, Sharples, Colin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And, in my experience watching work done with tools like Gump, any time people do weird trickery with package names, like Sun renaming some packages from x.y.z to com.sun.x.y.z, this inevitably seems to cause

[OT][logging] politics [WAS Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?]

2004-12-21 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 21 Dec 2004, at 20:24, Ceki Gülcü wrote: At 07:51 PM 12/21/2004, robert burrell donkin wrote: now it's getting political :( Your comments about the optionality of consultations elicited my political response. i've given up politics. (feel free to reply to my missive but please spend some time

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient/protocol ReflectionSocketFactory.java

2004-12-21 Thread olegk
olegk 2004/12/21 15:15:21 Modified:httpclient/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient/params DefaultHttpParams.java httpclient/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient/protocol ReflectionSocketFactory.java Log: PR #32607

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/httpclient release_notes.txt

2004-12-21 Thread olegk
olegk 2004/12/21 15:21:32 Modified:httpclient release_notes.txt Log: PR #32607 Revision ChangesPath 1.45 +4 -0 jakarta-commons/httpclient/release_notes.txt Index: release_notes.txt ===

Re: [dbutils] Problem with common DBUtil Bean

2004-12-21 Thread spframe live
Right I just changed from long to java.math.BigDecimal and for date field java.sql.Timestamp and it worked. I will try new build soon. Thanks for quick reply spframe live David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, you need to alias the column names in the sql to avoid having to use the

RE: AW: AW: AW: [proposal] avoiding jar version nightmares

2004-12-21 Thread Sharples, Colin
I do not think you can compare JDK APIs to commons APIs as you hardly have more than one version of JDK API in your classpath ;) You mean you've never written an RMI app where the client and server were running different JVM levels? ;-) Colin Sharples IBM Advisory IT Specialist Email: [EMAIL