Re: [Cooker] mmx and such

2003-03-21 Thread Guy.Bormann
[snip] It's not a matter of complaining or not, it's a matter of minimal support. Mandrake Linux is supposed to run on any i586 or newer processor. Period. Even if that means a crazy person is encoding videos on a i586(no MMX), say, 166MHz (or somewhere near) without hardware acceleration

Re: [Cooker] Re: War (Warning: Even more OT)

2003-03-14 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 13 Mar 2003, James Sparenberg wrote: On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 15:03, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 19:56, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote: [snip] If you're going to expect the Bushes to know about Spanish and Russian politics, maybe you should learn to spell George Bush?

Re: [Cooker] Cooking on cooker [ Was : WAR ]

2003-03-13 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Michael Scherer wrote: And of course neither french fries nor french toast have a thing to do with France. In the first case, IIRC, the dish in question originated in Belgium Are you sure sure ? Some cooking books of my grand mother said it comes from Paris, near

Re: [Cooker] Re: War

2003-03-13 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote: Don't you think they are absolutely crazzy?. Well, actually I am sure that there are lots of Americans that don't think in this way. Here in Spain more than 90% of the people don't wont the war, but for our president this doesn't matter

Re: [Cooker] ACPI Testing

2003-02-24 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 22 Feb 2003, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 22:45, Buchan Milne wrote: [snip] I get the feeling if someone would just write some damn *documentation* for the current ACPI implementation we'd find out all sorts of cool things it does. As it stands, anyone who isn't a

Re: [Cooker] Learning from windows ...

2003-02-20 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Buchan Milne wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Interesting reading: http://www.winsupersite.com/reviews/winserver2k3_gold2.asp Have you seen Tux next to the TV set on the first picture? :-) [snip] Guy Bormann P.S.: I think any large project has a

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1649] [drakxtools] localedrake: can't chooseBelgium as country when choosing English language

2003-02-18 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 17 Feb 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: fhimpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649 [snip empty lines] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-15 23:30 --- I had installed locales-nl. As Dutch is one of the three

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1705] [Installation] RFE- Change /root/drakx/report.bug.gzto /root/drakx/bug-rprt.gz

2003-02-18 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 17 Feb 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: mrmazda [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: DR-DOS 8's release is imminent: http://www.drdos.com/ mwh ahahaha eheheehh. hum, sorry. Don't laugh, it is still extensively used in embedded devices and process control and it is nowhere as bad as MS-DOS

Re: [Cooker] A new Mandrake Baby!

2003-02-11 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 11 Feb 2003, Jean-Michel Dault wrote: I'm now a new daddy.. it's a girl, Gabrielle. Join the club! Congratulations! She is a whole lot of baby :-) Is she as geeky as her daddy? My daughter was 46cm and 2kg 990g, a cute little packet :-) Guy Bormann See all the pictures at

Re: [Cooker] Re: Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-10 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 10 Feb 2003, Gustavo Franco wrote: On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 02:47, Greg Meyer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 09 February 2003 06:05 pm, Gustavo Franco wrote: On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 15:36, Steve Fox wrote: On Sat, 2003-02-08 at 13:36, Gustavo Franco

Re: [Cooker] Re: Creation of a community ( was : the end is inevitable )

2003-02-10 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Greg Meyer wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 10 February 2003 12:22 am, Steve Fox wrote: The only thing in doubt is the reference to 'Mandrake developers', which makes it sound like Mandrakesoft employees were in this discussion, which

[Cooker] Re: Creation of community

2003-02-10 Thread Guy.Bormann
Hi Greg, I am a complete jackass myself to not check the addressees in the reply and funny things go on with the Subject field. It was not directly pointed to you and now that these messages arrive out-of-order it seems so irrelevant. Sorry! However, my point about the pointless blaming still

Re: [Cooker] Kernel: ACPI/APIC bug

2003-02-05 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Levi Ramsey wrote: On Tue Feb 04 19:51 -0500, Gregory K. Meyer wrote: I am seeing posts on A.O.L.M, bug reports (including mine - 115) and some posts on various other web forums related to the onboard network, sound and usb of many newer motherboards not working. I

Re: [Cooker] win32 for 9.1? migration tools

2003-02-03 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Leon Brooks wrote: On Saturday 01 February 2003 11:00 pm, Buchan Milne wrote: On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Leon Brooks wrote: [snip] It'd make a great screenplay, and far more plausible than a Cassiopea uploading a virus to an alien spaceship... (-: actually, a virus on a Windows

Re: [Cooker] mdkkdm - project goals? (So we can help)

2003-02-03 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Gregory K. Meyer wrote: --- On Mon 02/03, Laurent Montel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le Monday 03 February 2003 15:39, Jason Straight a écrit : [snip] New kdm is a just a redesign of kdm. It's a lot of work to redesign the UI of something that is very nice already. I

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1062] [drakxtools] New: No ip over 1394

2003-01-27 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, John Danielson, II wrote: [Bug 1062] wrote: https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062 Product: drakxtools Component: DrakConnect Summary: No ip over 1394 Version: 9.1-0.13mdk Platform: PC

Re: [Cooker] New rpmdrake

2003-01-21 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 20 Jan 2003, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: Benjamin Pflugmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue 2003-01-14 at 05:31:22 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Chris Picton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I feel that the radio buttons 'Normal information', and 'Maximum information'

Re: [Cooker] 9.1 Beta 2

2003-01-20 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Mon, 20 Jan 2003, Marcel Pol wrote: On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:14:50 +0100 Warly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Midnight Commander 83 (really useful ?) Yes, it's imo the best filemanager for console and X (xterm) Yep, as a filemanager on non-X servers and as a fallback when X is in

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake Broke?

2003-01-17 Thread Guy.Bormann
[snip] As far as IBM bailing out SUSE, that was also another first. They were the first of the majors to approach bankruptcy, I would hedge bets that if Mandrakesoft was the first approaching Bankruptcy, then IBM may well have bailed out Mandrake and SUSE would be declaring Chapter 11 style

Re: [Cooker] 650 or 700 MB

2003-01-15 Thread Guy.Bormann
650 MB, 700 MB, 680 MB? ^^^ ^^ Well, depends on what is meant. Thanks to marketing (It looks like we offer just a little bit more...) and serial comm there is confusion over the meaning of MB (in the context of data storage, not transfer!) : 650 MB = 650*1024^2 =

Re: [Cooker] Software naming (was: Please don't make urpmi stupid)

2003-01-09 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hmm. must be from the days when you had to enter special codes for each key stroke. Please reply BELOW the message! Quoting Steve Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 01:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the name urpmi does sound stupid,

Re: [Cooker] [OT] Re: [CHRPM] rpm-4.0.4-27mdk

2003-01-09 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 9 Jan 2003, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is that some sort of 'my changelog is strongers than yours' challenge ? not really we don't really compete (or if we do i will kick them all). And pollute it with nonsense... Guy Bormann

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] gstreamer-0.5.1-1mdk

2003-01-08 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Charles A Edwards wrote: On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 13:18:29 -0800 Todd Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] [root@localhost gstreamer-plugins]# strace rpm -Uvh Someone might want to try strace -f rpm -Uvh relevant-gstreamer-package instead to

Re: [Cooker] Bug in gcc-3.2.1 .src.rpm build

2003-01-08 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 7 Jan 2003, Austin Acton wrote: $ rpm -bb gcc.spec worked perfectly on my dual Athlon 1900 $ rpmbuild -bb --target=athlonxp gcc.spec failed to even get underway, but that's because I have no athlonxp-mandrake-linux-gnu target on my machine Are you 100% sure your rpm/BUILD and rpm/tmp

Re: [Cooker] intop (ntop-2.1.2-1mdk) doesn't start

2002-12-04 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 3 Dec 2002, Gilles Mocellin wrote: [root@guitare root]# intop -i eth1 -- intop 0.0.1 (Sep 12 2002) -- The first interactive ntop program. (C) Copyright 2000 L. Deri and R. Carbone. All rights reserved. It allows you to control the power of ntop using fingers rather than

Re: [Cooker] WTF?

2002-11-20 Thread Guy.Bormann
[snip] Because I do not trust tinydns to do the job. I know a guy that has been working several years with the dot se top domain..., and I do take his word for it... Ok... you don't trust tinydns to do the job. Fair enough. Can I ask why? I had the whole icq chat in my

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake Made Easy: a modest suggestion for Windowsusers[linux , what sucks ?]

2002-11-14 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Faraj Meir wrote: Somoen mentinned a tool called tranfugdrake, which do this. After all, it could be a great thing no ? At least for some basics things, such a internet connection. yep but not only ... generaly anything is better that nothing a tool like this

[Cooker] Choice! (was Re: [CHRPM] kdelibs-3.1-0.beta2.11mdk)

2002-10-30 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Mario Vazquez wrote: You are right, a poll would be nice. No matter which one Mandrake will choose at the end, it must be (1) the one the most users want, and (2) apply the same to gnome to have a little uniformity between desktops. I still don't understand why uniformity

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kdelibs-3.1-0.beta2.11mdk

2002-10-30 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, David Walser wrote: --- Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 21:30, David Walser wrote: [snip] Thank you for the second reminder that Gnome sucks. Keyboard crap for copy/paste == Ctrl-C/Ctrl-V, in That is completely a function of what you are

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kdelibs-3.1-0.beta2.11mdk

2002-10-30 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 30 Oct 2002, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 12:13, Guy.Bormann wrote: Linux you just highlight and middle click. And yes ^^ what has Linux got to do with it??!!! You meant KDE? No, actually, I think he was right. From my understanding, the concept

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kdelibs-3.1-0.beta2.11mdk

2002-10-30 Thread Guy.Bormann
[snip] This goes back to Warly's question of what needs to be improved in the development process, and openness could be even better. It seems some changes are just mandated to the developers we interact with from somewhere above, and they just seem to come from out of nowhere, with no

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kdelibs-3.1-0.beta2.11mdk

2002-10-30 Thread Guy.Bormann
[snip] why hasten it? Won't happen if it didn't in the past 15 yrs. If you keep the button near threshold you don't need much finger movement, just the last bit of activation energy. And you move the mouse using your elbow, pivoting on the lower arm muscle cushion (on the table side) instead of

Re: [Cooker] Why ext3fs is a default fs, not ReiserFS?

2002-10-10 Thread Guy.Bormann
[snip] ReiserFS people have an excellent vision of next-gen plugin-based filesystem, but it turns out it's not quite ready yet. When (if) it becomes ready, however, it will replace ext?fs without doubt (my doubt, anyway ;-) ). Mmm, that's what they keep telling about translators on the

Re: [Cooker] Marcos colome

2002-10-04 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Todd Lyons wrote: marcos colome wrote on Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 03:10:48PM -0700 : Please remove my name from your mailing list Handled offlist. I begin to suspect that this is some autoreply from an active Yahoo spamfilter since it is always exactly the same sentence by

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 - Voodoo 3 - No devices detected

2002-10-02 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 1 Oct 2002, Wes Kurdziolek wrote: No, the NV03 is the RIVA128 chipset. The NV04 is the chipset for the TNT, the TNT2 (a sped-up version of the TNT w/ support for more RAM), and the Vanta (cheap-ass version of TNT). NVidia started marketing the Ok, thanks for the details. So, the NV04 is

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 - Voodoo 3 - No devices detected

2002-10-01 Thread Guy.Bormann
The Diamond Viper V550 is a TNT card, not a RIVA128 card, and there's no such thing as a TNT128 chipset despite the fact that the TNT is a 128-bit chipset. Mmm, how do you explain the following lspci -v output then? See attachment I don't believe I've ever come across an AGP card or a PCI

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 - Voodoo 3 - No devices detected

2002-10-01 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Ron Stodden wrote: Guy.Bormann wrote: [snip] 9.0 is unusable on this machine, 8.2 is fully functional. Am I not to complain? Until you show us /var/log/XFree86.some number, likely 0.log, lspci -v, /var/log/dmesg and /proc/iomem?...Nope, you can not! (Oh, BTW

Re: [Cooker] devfsd.conf

2002-10-01 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Biagio Lucini wrote: On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now that 9.0 is out ... Minor spelling corrections in English version. Initialize not initialise Minimize not minimise Maximize not maximise Did you say English or American? :-) Well,

Re: [Cooker] Broken psaux sndconfig (cs4235)

2002-09-30 Thread Guy.Bormann
I checked the CD that came with the sound card. There is no DOS software to be found on it. Well, no problem. I think the mouse is OK. However, you compared apples with oranges by doing the tests on two different platforms (i.e. different motherboards from different manufacturers) and the tests

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 - Mozilla 1.1 - [snip] 9.0 - Voodoo 3 -[snip]

2002-09-30 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, allen wrote: I have an AMD 1Ghz, about 300MB RAM, Voodoo3 AGP, about 20GB HDD IDE. ^ look Ron, get in touch with him... [snip : not failsafe though...] Guy (yep, me again)

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 - Voodoo 3 - No devices detected

2002-09-30 Thread Guy.Bormann
[snip] 9.0 is unusable on this machine, 8.2 is fully functional. Am I not to complain? Until you show us /var/log/XFree86.some number, likely 0.log, lspci -v, /var/log/dmesg and /proc/iomem?...Nope, you can not! (Oh, BTW, how does /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 look like???) If you provide us this, we

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 - Voodoo 3 - No devices detected

2002-09-30 Thread Guy.Bormann
The XF86Config-4 and /var/log/XFree86.0.log are attached. Both look good to me, yet no X appears. Not to me, since it finds more than one primary device so it doesn't know which one to associate the driver with. Either try setting the BusID (see man XF86Config for the format of the BusID

Re: [Cooker] gnome integrated su

2002-09-30 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote: On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:37:18 +, Sascha Noyes wrote: When clicking on the mcc icon on the top taskbar in the gnome environment, one is prompted for root password. But when exiting mcc, and starting it again from the same icon, one is not

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 - Voodoo 3 - No devices detected

2002-09-30 Thread Guy.Bormann
[snip : see other mail] cat /proc/interrupts shows no allocation to the video board (?). Shouldn't be a problem. AFAIK, graphics board are completely memory-mapped (through AGP, don't know about the Voodoo3, though) and don't need an PCI IRQ. This is not the problem. See my previous message on

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 - Voodoo 3 - No devices detected

2002-09-30 Thread Guy.Bormann
yet) and I disabled IRQ assignment to VGA. The card is obviously still working happily. That might change when I start playing videos or so, I don't know... Guy On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 12:28, Guy.Bormann wrote: [snip : see other mail] cat /proc/interrupts shows no allocation to the video

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 install - no hdlist2.cz

2002-09-27 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Levi Ramsey wrote: On Fri Sep 27 11:36 +1000, Ron Stodden wrote: I repeated the call just now: [ron@small ron]$ rsync rsync://ftp.uninett.no:873/Mandrake/ drwxr-xr-x4096 2001/11/04 07:36:22 . drwxr-xr-x4096 2002/09/26 03:29:03 Mandrake

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 rc3 problems with upgrade from 8.2

2002-09-26 Thread Guy.Bormann
Why is install about 8 times longer than it should be? Dependency checks I guess, causing a roughly exponential increase in time instead of your linear extrapolation. In the pre-configured cases, the RPMS could be installed using --nodeps if that is not already done and fixing the dependency

Re: [Cooker] 9.0 and next

2002-09-26 Thread Guy.Bormann
[snip] 2. a trust metric system for bug reporters. (2) would be useful because it would give a fast indication of where the problems lie (I'm thinking of tying this into drakbug or something), and automatically filter out noise How would you handle aging of the trust metric? When there is

Re: [Cooker] Re: Nondeliverable mail

2002-09-25 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Todd Lyons wrote: Marcel Pol wrote on Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:17:26AM +0200 : Could it be hat he is subscribed with this adress? Just a blind guess, the name looks so familiar. janmaris at zonnet.nl A feeler email has been sent. Will let you know the results

Re: [Cooker] Broken psaux (was 9.0 final when ?)

2002-09-24 Thread Guy.Bormann
[snip] 2-OS/2 doesn't find it necessary to reserve IRQ 15 when there is only one IDE device in the system and the secondary IDE controller is disabled to free IRQ 15 for something that wants or needs it. Fair enough. [snip] accomodate all extension cards. But on the other hand, only use

Re: [Cooker] `death ears' (-:

2002-09-24 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Leon Brooks wrote: On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 20:50, Michael Holt wrote: [snip : too much honor] battery chickens ran on size D drycells (I kid you not!). Ok, I give up - what are battery chickens?? A battery of anything is a long row of them. So a D cell (or for that

Re: [Cooker] Just joined - Alan of the MandrakeSoft support teamsuggested i join

2002-09-24 Thread Guy.Bormann
[snip] The ps/2 mouse problem bit me again this morning. Just a fropzen pointer. It happened again but I was watching the boot messages this time. Said /dev/psaux doesn't exist which is interesting as it does. It worked O.K. on the next boot. Mmm, also Felix has trouble with psaux.

Re: [Cooker] Just joined - Alan of the MandrakeSoft support teamsuggested i join

2002-09-24 Thread Guy.Bormann
It worked O.K. on the next boot. Mmm, also Felix has trouble with psaux. It's to soon to say they are --too related though... Sorry, typo! I shut up for now... Guy

Re: [Cooker] Broken psaux (was 9.0 final when ?)

2002-09-24 Thread Guy.Bormann
Still haven't learned how yet, so you get .zip attachment instead (shrunk only about 50%, total 4545 bytes). The mouse device is active as per the /proc/interrupts info. All cards seem to be detected and initialized alright (from dmesg). (I would try to get the NIC on IRQ 9, the sound card on

Re: [Cooker] [OT] batteries

2002-09-24 Thread Guy.Bormann
Not. I disassembled a fair few of them in my childhood, e.g. for carbon anodes for chemistry experiments. Yep, you should talk to Igor, he is sharing the same passion for batteries... :-) (As I told him, it could have been a reinforcement frame in a light casing...) In fact, I don't know of

Re: [Cooker] cron.daily: rpm

2002-09-23 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 20 Sep 2002, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 13:24, Götz Waschk wrote: Am Freitag, 20. September 2002, 13:58:31 Uhr MET, schrieb rcc: do we need to have rpm in cron.daily? Because like slocate it brings older computers almost to a halt. Stop whining. How long can a

Re: [Cooker] APIC support

2002-09-23 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, [iso-8859-15] Stéphane Teletchéa wrote: It seems my mobo is an APIC-only one. ACPI, you mean? Why doesn't it be included in the kernel ? (Too much work, unstable, ???) Bad, unconsistent implementation in BIOSes, although it is getting better, 'they say.' My old win98

Re: [Cooker] `death ears' (-:

2002-09-23 Thread Guy.Bormann
[snip] ROFL! (-: `Larry Boy and the Ears of Death?' :-) It's `deaf ears' as in ears that do not hear. (-: Thanks for lightening my morning a bit :-) [snip : you only found out after getting married] battery chickens ran on size D drycells (I kid you not!). A few things like this helped

Re: [Cooker] Broken psaux (was 9.0 final when ?)

2002-09-23 Thread Guy.Bormann
First, I don't understand why OS/2 also assigns IRQ 15 to the sound card since IRQ 14 and 15 are reserved for the Primary and Secondary IDE channel resp. IRQ 3,4 and 5 can be used by either the serial port (internal and external) or ISA cards (check BIOS). Using them for PCI should only be done

Re: [Cooker] Re: [Contrib-Rpm] hot-babe-0.1.0-1mdk

2002-09-20 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 19 Sep 2002, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 20:00, Guillaume Rousse wrote: [Contrib-RPM] Name: hot-babe Relocations: (not relocateable) [snip] Description : Hot-babe is a small graphical utility which display the system activity in a very

Re: [Cooker] Stackguard, FormatGuard for future Mandrake versions?

2002-09-19 Thread Guy.Bormann
[snip : Stackguard fart] This should be taken up with the ISO C standardization committee so that boundary checking becomes an optional language feature (giving us a well thought out choice) instead of forcing a stopgap measure on everybody... [snip : to the point security reply by Ben] why not

Re: [Cooker] Cooker way to much...

2002-09-19 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Todd Franklin wrote: I personally have almost 6000 unread emails in the cooker group alone, but i'm not upset about it! If anything it's like having a personal database for when i run accross a bug. Even if I don't have time to read them all, if I come accross a

Re: [Cooker] Minor visual glitches in Mandrake gtk2 theme

2002-09-18 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 18 Sep 2002, Adam Williamson wrote: followup - after an urpmi.update (though nothing obviously related got installed) and a reboot, both my problems went away - scrollbar backgrounds now work, and the scrollbar block (come on, there HAS to be a proper name for this :) Index slider?? now

Re: [Cooker] OpenOffice affected by SetiAtHome

2002-09-12 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Fri, 13 Sep 2002, Leon Brooks wrote: On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 21:40, Crispin Boylan wrote: This may or may not be fixable, but it seems that OpenOffice.org drastically slows down responsiveness when setiathome is running in the background, sure its easy enough to turn off but no other apps

Re: [Cooker] Cooker is frozen / 9.0 schedule

2002-09-03 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Ron Stodden wrote: Levi Ramsey wrote: On Wed Aug 28 17:07 +0200, Guy.Bormann wrote: Why do you always smile the other way? :-))) He's Australian... it's kind of like how water drains in the opposite direction and they drive on the wrong (not the right...) side

Re: [Cooker] Mailing lists dead

2002-08-29 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Guy.Bormann wrote: On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Jure Repinc wrote: David Walser wrote: Where'd everybody go? I usually wake up to over 50 new messages, but none? Even the archive shows none. A bunch of stuff was going on on the mirrors, but nothing on the changelog

Re: [Cooker] Cooker is frozen / 9.0 schedule

2002-08-28 Thread Guy.Bormann
Yes, hush, don't tell rsync that it can possibly be doing this. (-: Why do you always smile the other way? :-))) Cheers; Leon Guy Bormann

Re: [Cooker] Off Topic

2002-07-31 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Marcelo Gigirey wrote: http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2871663,00.html A must read article Must read article? There's not even a decent comparison. Call me paranoid but this is a blatant plug bought for by Red Hat (Afficianados, Investors,

Re: [Cooker] mailcap requirisity (fwd)

2002-06-19 Thread Guy.Bormann
Not that I needed it (as nothing goes wrong here without mutt :-) but thank you for the explanation. It's more authoritative than shouting Is! Is not!'s back and forth. I know MIME is for selecting view clients at the receiving end (which does require the right tagging at the sending end). I was

Re: [Cooker] BUG with gcc,glibc,clone

2002-06-19 Thread Guy.Bormann
Hi, clone() does get called but with -lpthread it segfaults (currently, only main() threads core dump; this is being worked on by the LKD's). (To see this try strace -f ./cl1 ) Anyway, like I asked you in a private message already why would you mix the clone() system call with libpthread calls

Re: [Cooker] BUG with gcc,glibc,clone

2002-06-19 Thread Guy.Bormann
Oops, forgot : and you should always compile your programs with -DREENTRANT (or add #define REENTRANT), at least that's how it used to be, it is not in the man page (anymore?). Maybe, gcc is now configured to recognize -lpthread and automatically emit REENTRANT save code... Guy

Re: [Cooker] mailcap requirisity (fwd)

2002-06-18 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, Ben Reser wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 07:55:42AM +0200, Tibor Pittich wrote: this is BULLSHIT! pdf is binary format at all. there doesn't matter that containing graphics or only text. this is thing, that i testing about 2 weeks and i have big problem with sending

Re: [Cooker] Real world testing (was Re: is gcc 3.1 rebuilding done yet?)

2002-05-27 Thread Guy.Bormann
Still no reason to whine! Especially *not* when newbies (i.e. apparently less-priviledged as opposed to self-appointed experts) get bashed for exactly the same type of message (what triggered their message doesn't matter). Do your Real World testing and clearly report the problems. I've said

Re: [Cooker] php-4.2.1-3mdk.src.rpm + php-xmlrpc-4.2.1-1mdk.src.rpm

2002-05-24 Thread Guy.Bormann
(The f*cked up A RR for d-srv.com has expired now..., well I did it to myself, so what can I say other than I'm a dickhead... :-)) You're complete utterly mindless idiot? :oP :- Guy

[Cooker] XFree86 4.x memory leakage

2002-05-23 Thread Guy.Bormann
Fred, Are you still directly involved with XFree86 development? (Sorry list, I know he's on this list and I forgot his exact Mdk mail addr...) If so, is there an explanation(*) why the X server's virtual memory size constantly increases while the resident set size stays reasonably low? (This is

Re: [Cooker] Re: Re: is gcc 3.1 rebuilding done yet?

2002-05-21 Thread Guy.Bormann
So what does this mean in terms of the usablilty of the current Mozilla/Galeon in Cooker? Without Java (and Javascript?), it seems quite useless for real world usage, no? So what?!! _AGAIN_, Mandrake Cooker is _not_ supposed to be used for real world usage! How hard is this to understand?

[Cooker] xf86cfg crash on initial module probing

2002-05-03 Thread Guy.Bormann
Hi, xf86cfg of the XFree86-4.2.0-12mdk packages crashes at the initial Loading/Unloading of modules with the following error messages : ... Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/vesa_drv.o Module vesa: vendor=The XFree86 Project compiled for 4.2.0, module version = 1.0.0 Unloading

!!!OT!!: Re: [Cooker] Is LKCD worth including in kernel?

2002-05-02 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Oden Eriksson wrote: On Thursdayen den 2 May 2002 14.19, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: What I really miss in Linux is ability to take and analyze system dump. Anybody have tried LKCD project? Is it mature enough to be included in released kernel? Is there any interest to

Re: [Cooker] images/readme out of date?

2002-04-24 Thread Guy.Bormann
On 24 Apr 2002, Liam R. E. Quin wrote: The images/readme.txt file on the ftp mirrors is maybe old? Is it a wrong version? Also, maybe it could give more explanation on how to use the network boot image? For many people that's a lot easier than burning CDs, and the net install seems to

Re: [Cooker] Why is xmatrix missing from xscreensaver?

2002-04-24 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Levi Ramsey wrote: On Wed Apr 24 23:51 +1000, Geoffrey Lee wrote: Probably, or probably not. But we can't risk our asses just because we *think* that it's ok to use xmatrix without some sort of licensing. I'm sure that was what I felt when I removed it. Exactly.

[Cooker] Serious imlib bug in some 1.9.x versions

2002-04-19 Thread Guy.Bormann
!!Sorry, template message ahead!! - Hello, There is a potentially serious problem with (lib)imlib for versions up to and including 1.9.13 that crept in probably around 1.9.9 or 1.9.10 (haven't checked but it was probably first

Re: [Cooker] Serious imlib bug in some 1.9.x versions

2002-04-19 Thread Guy.Bormann
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote: On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 15:08:47 +0200, Guy.Bormann wrote: !!Sorry, template message ahead!! - Hello, [snip] so this message is posted to the major Linux bleeding-edge distros (I