On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:43:57AM +0100, Olivier Blin wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:58:17 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have you missed that cramfs is readonly ?
we actually are missing /dev/root
as mkrootdev /dev/root fails -- read only fs
but it probably
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:07:32PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
I am still unable to mount cramfs initrd at boot, i am seeing the same
problem as Olivier
it doesn't work here too :(
and i have no idea why it isn't working :(
I tested both with olivier and svetljo kernels
(btw i
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:53:52PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
--- mkinitrd.luca 2003-11-18 21:30:00.0 +0100
+++ mkinitrd.mod_ide2003-11-19 16:39:44.645379336 +0100
added in mkinitrd-3.4.43-9.99.2mdk
which will appear in all theatres as soon i fix a nasty tmpfs
-Original Message-
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 21:22:10 +0300
Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at least make it depend on CONFIG_CRAMFS_INITRD. it is not that crmafs
is available but that it is used for initrd.
but if it is really read-only, our initrd needs
Hi,
I've made some tests this night to reduce the size of 2.6 kernel.
I've modularized almost all that can be (except IDE, mouse and
keyboard).
vmlinuz is now a bit less than 1.3 Megabytes.
Compiling ext2 as a module would save us about 70 more kilobytes.
ext2 module is 79k, cramfs takes
have you tried adding --nocompress
cramfs is already compressed and adding --nocompress increases the
size with~2k
Yes, I tried, with --compress, the initrd is really a cramfs one (not a
gzipped cramfs), so it needs the cramfs initrd patch.
Same results, the cramfs image is
... cramfs
Should I make it an option in mkinitrd ?
I guess yes. But this is compatibility problem. It is not
supported on vanilla kernel so you have to detect patched kernel
somehow. And how are you going to do it? You will get a flood of
bug reports from users
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 07:01:01PM +0100, Olivier Blin wrote:
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:58:17 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it didn't worked, but it works with the debian's mkinitrd
I'll have a look, thanks :)
LFS's mkinitrd is a good reference too.
have you
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 09:21:26PM +0100, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
i'll be happy to test, but sadly i can not help to get it merged :(
ok, point me to a kernel that has cramfs working and i'll start testing
on my own
binary rpm or source ?-)
for the second you might get my patch tarball
On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 15:58:17 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
have you missed that cramfs is readonly ?
we actually are missing /dev/root
as mkrootdev /dev/root fails -- read only fs
but it probably needs quite deeper changes
Actually, that isn't my problem
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 09:51:29PM +0100, Olivier Blin wrote:
By the way, what should we do about devfs ?
It is deprecated, but is there any working alternative yet ?
udev needs userspace tools IIRC.
uhm, good question, we still ship it enabled by default in 9.2, but
there is nothing (i
On Sunday 16 November 2003 06:56, Olivier Blin wrote:
my current patch tarball is uploading
linux-test9s5.tar.bz2
nosrc.rpm may be rpm after successfully recompile
under the same kernel :-)
please keep just patches for us poor dial-upers as well :)
nosrc.rpm's will
On Sunday 16 November 2003 05:31, Olivier Blin wrote:
--
arent the following pretty important,
and alwasys needed ?
the right question is - are they needed to *boot* kernel?
-CONFIG_PACKET=y
+CONFIG_PACKET=m
module
On Sunday 16 November 2003 06:20, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 23:20:00 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nope, module does not work. Even if it possible to fix all missing
exported
symbols, IDE layer does not provide for any sort
On Sunday 16 November 2003 06:20, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
my current patch tarball is uploading
linux-test9s5.tar.bz2
I tried 3rdparty but it won't work as is. Dynamically generating Makefile
and
Kconfig highly confuses build system; BTW it won't even compile if all
3rdparty
On Sunday 16 November 2003 15:21, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
you missed my point. modular IDE is unsafe because there is no
reference
counting for IDE modules. their patch does not change it, it just adds
a
couple of EXPORT_MODULES. Nor does patch really fixes
MOD_{INC,DEC
On Sunday 16 November 2003 06:20, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
my current patch tarball is uploading
linux-test9s5.tar.bz2
I tried 3rdparty but it won't work as is. Dynamically generating Makefile
and
Kconfig highly confuses build system; BTW it won't even compile if all
3rdparty
On Sunday 16 November 2003 16:57, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2003 15:21, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
you missed my point. modular IDE is unsafe because there is no
reference
counting for IDE modules.
[...]
wouldn't it be then sufficient just
On Sunday 16 November 2003 15:45, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Sunday 16 November 2003 06:20, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
my current patch tarball is uploading
linux-test9s5.tar.bz2
I tried 3rdparty but it won't work as is. Dynamically generating
Makefile
and
Kconfig
On Friday 14 November 2003 17:32, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
will upload now nosrc.rpm /patches tarball :-)
remove BS02-kobject-oops-fixes.patch, it is already fixed (differently) in
-test9. should not be in current -mm either
OK,
thanks :-)
svetljo
--
NEU FÜR ALLE - GMX
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 04:44, Olivier Blin wrote:
Hi,
-CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=y
+CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM=m
should it be builtin for initrd to work? If not there is no reason to have
it
builtin.
IIRC yes, it has to be built in
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE=4096
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y
Quoting \Andrey Borzenkov\ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What would you like to have in next release ?
dxr3 driver :)
The tulip driver to work properly
DVB, Speedtouch and Bluetooth (Not sure if these are already added or not)
IIRC all of them are in vanilla 2.6
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 23:20:00 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nope, module does not work. Even if it possible to fix all missing
exported
symbols, IDE layer does not provide for any sort of module reference
counting
(for chipset drivers) meaning
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 04:20:24 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder how they do it.
Is there a patch for modular IDE in their kenrel ?
It is officially broken, even in 2.4 .
yes, they do have patches both for 2.4 for 2.6
2.6 patches uploaded
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 04:56:07 +0100
Olivier Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you please make your kernel config file available so that we can
discuss a bit more about options ?
Nevermind, I've found it.
How comes you have some extended attributes option for ReiserFS ?
:-) i found a
What would you like to have in next release ?
dxr3 driver :)
will upload now nosrc.rpm /patches tarball :-)
(see the last line of 4mdk )
%changelog
* Thu Nov 13 2003 Svetoslav Slavtchev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]ruby2.6-2.6.0-0.test9.4mdk
- test9-bk17 (for now it works :-) )
- more
-Original Message-
What would you like to have in next release ?
dxr3 driver :)
will upload now nosrc.rpm /patches tarball :-)
URL, please? :)
as always http://varna.demon.co.uk/~svetlio/cook/2.6/
:-)
svetljo
--
NEU FÜR ALLE - GMX
Just wondering, what is the rough development plan for Cooker?
Specifically, at what stage will the kernel 2.6 series be the focus and
the 2.4 go to contribs?
IMNSHO this is post-next release task. Actually i would even delay
it for release 11 :))
there are just too many
-Original Message-
Just wondering, what is the rough development plan for Cooker?
Specifically, at what stage will the kernel 2.6 series be the focus
and
the 2.4 go to contribs?
IMNSHO this is post-next release task. Actually i would even delay
Hi,
robert == Robert Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
robert Just wondering, what is the rough development plan for Cooker?
robert Specifically, at what stage will the kernel 2.6 series be the
focus and
robert the 2.4 go to contribs?
No. Just finishing a 2.6 kernel code (based on the one
svetoslav == Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
svetoslav :(
svetoslav so far no one (officialy) stated anything about 2.6 and
mdk-10.0, am i
svetoslav wrong ?
Humm, I told in previous message what I thought. But as always, it is
my opinion :) Not sure what
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:26:04 -0600
Bret Baptist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that my VIA82CXXX IDE chipset module was not placed in the
initrd. I remade the initrd with the module using --with=via82cxxx,
then I found out that ide drivers don't work well as modules So I
rebuilt
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:49:01 +0100 (MET)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
very short note (will come back later with longer one :) )
wanna include some 3rdparty stuff ?-)
Why not :)
That won't kill me or significantly increase the built time.
greate :-)
i'm trying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruno Prior wrote:
Buchan,
As was explained earlier in this thread, plenty of people have 9.2 now,
because it is being included with various linux magazines. I don't know
about the Spanish one, but the Linux Format DVD looks pretty
On Monday 10 November 2003 09:01 am, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
-=-=-=-
Name: kernel-2.4.22.25mdk Relocations: (not
relocateable)
Version : 1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 1mdk Build Date: Mon Nov 10
{pts/1}% rpm -q module-init-tools
module-init-tools-0.9.15-0.pre2.0.2bor
any special reason for not using -pre3 ?
i'm thinking to rebuild them under 9.2 cooker
and upload them to the usuak address
(may be update to -pre3 if no reason exist)
hint hint
unless you give me permissions to
On Saturday 01 November 2003 21:01, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Saturday 01 November 2003 06:03, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
all FS's built in ? why that ?
Oops, there is no reason to do that, I've now compiled ext3, jbd,
ReiserFS, jfs and xfs as modules in -2mdk
On Sunday 09 November 2003 14:14, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
{pts/1}% rpm -q module-init-tools
module-init-tools-0.9.15-0.pre2.0.2bor
any special reason for not using -pre3 ?
any special reason to use -pre3? AFAIK there are no significant changes
against -pre2 and I have nothing
On Sunday 09 November 2003 14:07, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
[...]
2.4 with debuging (CONFIG_KSYMS=yes)
1337954 Aug 25 17:47 /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-1mdk
2.4 without KSYMS (~ kernel tmb here)
1035464 Nov 9 04:04 /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.22-21br.1mdk
2.6 without debuging
1532105 Oct
On Sunday 09 November 2003 18:51, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
[...]
That is with standard mdk config? Yes it is bad if kernel does not fit
on
one
floppy.
if i didn't missed smth, it's a standard 2.4 mdk config
+ some new ide drivers (part of them probably can be built
IMO there couldn't be a reason for not including them in cooker,
hotplug may be(?hotplug service?), but module-init-tools must go in
no one is forced to turn on this service (it can be off by default as far
as I
am concerned). Using coldpug fixed at least one real problem - usb-storage
Still a little issue in test9-4mdk : you should compile capability
(CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=yes) in the kernel, not a module (,
otherwise bind can't be started until capability module is loaded..
thanks, it will be done in next release
please don't,
the kernel is bug enough
not
Still a little issue in test9-4mdk : you should compile capability
(CONFIG_SECURITY_CAPABILITIES=yes) in the kernel, not a module (,
otherwise bind can't be started until capability module is loaded..
thanks, it will be done in next release
oops, spell corrections :-)
please
Hi,
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2003-11-05 21:47 ---
so probably drakxtools should add it
when configuring ide-scsi CD/DVD devices
I still believe a better fix should fit in kernel. However, this was
the precise interim solution adopted here for
On Saturday 01 November 2003 06:03, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
all FS's built in ? why that ?
Oops, there is no reason to do that, I've now compiled ext3, jbd,
ReiserFS, jfs and xfs as modules in -2mdk.
ext2 is still built-in because our initrd image is ext2.
By the way, should
On Friday 31 October 2003 13:46, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
[...]
actually on second look it's a bit later,
the last line is :
Freeing unused kernel memory:272k freed
[...]
Do you mean that using the same setup test9 stops logging to console
and
previous kernels
well vanilla test9 has brocken rlogin/rsh
Do you seriously mean anyone is using them? Or does it apply to ssh as
well?
well,
it was reported by 3-4 people on lkml :-)
besides Linus is currently accepting only _real_bug_fixes_
and i have the impression that somehow -bk's are more stable
well vanilla test9 has brocken rlogin/rsh
Do you seriously mean anyone is using them? Or does it apply to ssh as
well?
well,
it was reported by 3-4 people on lkml :-)
Ah, if you mean that, it was not rsh. The OOB data delivery was broken
and this is used by
PS.
is serial console working for everyone ?
i just tried it and when fbcon took over vgacon,
it stopped logging to ttyS0
is this normal behaviour ?
apparently not. I guess James Simmons may be interested :) BTW have
you
tried
actually on second look
all FS's built in ? why that ?
Oops, there is no reason to do that, I've now compiled ext3, jbd,
ReiserFS, jfs and xfs as modules in -2mdk.
ext2 is still built-in because our initrd image is ext2.
By the way, should we switch to ROM FS or Minix FS for initrd in order
to gain some space
i would rather wait for a later bk snapshot
if the question is what to release I'd rather used test9 given two
mentioned problems.
Should I consider applying 2.6.0-test9-mm1 patchset ?
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1070
The -love patchset from Gentoo guys has a lot of new
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:44, Élie Charest wrote:
Le 29 Octobre 2003 22:49, Con Kolivas a écrit :
Hi all
A couple of years
ago when I was subscribed to this list I suggested renicing X by
default
to -10 and noticed that it was done on the following release by
default.
That was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Le jeu 30/10/2003 à 14:20, Buchan Milne a écrit :
|
|Sorry to be against you Buchan, but as he knew there is a console
|program in RH, he should knew there is also one in Mdk aka XFdrake ...
|
|And what if the user had never used Redhat
On Tuesday 21 Oct 2003 7:42 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, X used to fall back to running a configuration tool.
This may have been long ago, when XFdrake wstill had a link for
XF86configure (or whatever Redhat used to call their
You may just as well jump to test9. I built against test8 only because
test9 did not propagated to locale kernel.org mirror last weekend.
patch applies to it even without any offset.
Nice :)
I have packaged -test9 with supermount -test8 patch, you can find it
here :
Apparently this progress bar is displayed not by kernel but by some
external program?
On 2.4.23-pre8 it is too short while on 2.6 it extends over the right side
- apparently
it depends on relative kernel version number :)
seriously, how it is computed? Oh, and anyone knows any attepmt to
I've built rpms of kernel-2.6-test8 (thanks to Andrey who released
supermount for -test8).
You may just as well jump to test9. I built against test8 only because
test9 did not
propagated to locale kernel.org mirror last weekend. patch applies to it
even without
any offset. Also I had
Francisco Alcaraz ha scritto:
Yes I hope this, but not idea about when; I have downloaded
the new kernel (not problematic lg drivers, but I suppose
it is bugless tan the old one).
Well, it has (at least) one less feature: packet writing capability has
been omitted :-(
well,
Hi,
I've built rpms of kernel-2.6-test8 (thanks to Andrey who released
supermount for -test8).
They're available here :
http://www.enseirb.fr/~blino/kernel-2.6/
Can someone please confirm it boots and works before I upload the rpms
to contrib ?
you might want to take a look at my
Right, I've created the ISOs, updated all the packages from the update
site. Have also updated Mozilla to version 1.5, included Thunderbird and
Firebird and updated k3b to 0.10
and if you are using my k3b rpms,
1.) have in mind that there are 3 negative votes (without resons :( )
2.) and
hours.
--- Weitergeleitete Nachricht / Forwarded Message ---
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:45:20 +0200
From: Sebastian Trueg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [K3b-user] supermount in cvs
On Thursday 23 October 2003 13:16, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
Hy guys
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:37:11 +0200 (MEST)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i'm trying to update firestarter
in order to use it under 2.6 test kernels,
the original src.rpm requires iptables
and we have two packages for iptables
one for 2.4 kernel one for 2.6
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 23:37:11 +0200 (MEST)
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i'm trying to update firestarter
in order to use it under 2.6 test kernels,
the original src.rpm requires iptables
and we have two packages for iptables
one for 2.4 kernel one
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:37 am, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
So do I. That's interest me.
I don't think we can do this just with makecd, and some updates are
interesting from the install ( I was thinking of kernel updates and
better ACPI/SATA support )
sata worked out of the box with
On Thursday 23 October 2003 05:56 am, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:37 am, FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
So do I. That's interest me.
I don't think we can do this just with makecd, and some updates are
interesting from the install ( I was thinking of kernel
svetoslav == Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
xconfig is a qt-gui.
do you have libqt3-devel installed?
svetoslav this is only the case for linux-2.6
svetoslav and as you can see here is 2.4.22-18mdk
svetoslav probably again alsa/ lufs/ ipsec Configure.in
svetoslav
Le mar 21/10/2003 à 18:42, Buchan Milne a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, X used to fall back to running a configuration tool.
This may have been long ago, when XFdrake wstill had a link for
XF86configure (or whatever Redhat used to call their
Le mar 21/10/2003 à 14:47, R N dev a écrit :
--- FACORAT Fabrice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO this patch should be integrated upstream (
detect cdrom using
supermount, unmount via /proc/fs/supermount/subfs,
import old session
and after restore settings )
I'm not so
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW, this exact same problem also existed in 9.1, so it is not a 9.2
regression.
well not exactly
in 9.1 the problem was only with xfs (module is ~300k)
in cooker/9.2 the kernel is compiled with all debuging symbols
we are out of freeze right ?-)
so
dvd+rw-tools need update
cooker - 5.11.4.6.4
latest - 5.13.4.7.4
mainly bug fixes/ workarounds for certain drives
and dvdauthor-0.6.0
needed for making Video DVD's
(requested on mdk-club, but until i find out
how to get access ...)
if someone is interested (
Hi,
i'm trying to update firestarter
in order to use it under 2.6 test kernels,
the original src.rpm requires iptables
and we have two packages for iptables
one for 2.4 kernel one for 2.6 kernel
the second one doesn't provide iptables
so when i try to install firestarter it prompts me to
On 10/22/2003 05:37:11 PM, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
is there a way to specify in the .spec
Requires iptables || iptables_kernel-2.6
I guess the only way is to make iptables_kernel-2.6 provide iptables...
and get in the situation with earlier rel. of k3b_0.10cvs ,
where the unstable
Hi Angelo,
just a short note :-)
you can compile the cvs k3b with qt 3.1,
just check out kde-common/admin for kde-3.1.3,
or grab the 0.10 tar ball / k3b_0.10cvs src.rpm
and copy the admin directory to the proper location
the make -f Makefile.cvs is your friend :-)
the cvs version does detect
Hi,
Hi,
I added the patch i did to find device configured with
supermount, and the spec file to add it on k3b 0.9 12mdk
if you want to try it.
At this moment it works, but i can import old session
only logged as root.
I cannot compile the CVS project (i have QT 3.1 on my
mdk 9.1 now); so
On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 17:47, Austin wrote:
On 10/22/2003 05:37:11 PM, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
is there a way to specify in the .spec
Requires iptables || iptables_kernel-2.6
I guess the only way is to make iptables_kernel-2.6 provide iptables...
Another way might be to invent
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 11:37:11PM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
and my question is :-)
is there a way to specify in the .spec
Requires iptables || iptables_kernel-2.6
no sorry, it's one of the biggest rpm shortcomings compared to deb
or how should i deal with this issue
either
xconfig is a qt-gui.
do you have libqt3-devel installed?
this is only the case for linux-2.6
and as you can see here is 2.4.22-18mdk
probably again alsa/ lufs/ ipsec Configure.in
needs tweaking
×××× ×©××ש×, 21 ×××
ק×××ר 2003, 23:09, × ××ª× ×
¢× ××× Bellegarde
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so the bloat started with 9.1 ?
can you check
grep CONFIG_KALLSYMS /boot/config-*
the bloat really was acpi support out of the box
acpi is about 120k that's true,
but acpi doesn't say :
the kernel size will increase with 10-20
Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so the bloat started with 9.1 ?
can you check
grep CONFIG_KALLSYMS /boot/config-*
the bloat really was acpi support out of the box
acpi is about 120k that's true,
but acpi doesn't say :
the kernel size will increase
From: Svetoslav Slavtchev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS.
there is one related thred on lkml may be
Where's the bzip2 compressed linux-kernel patch?
might be interesting to include it ?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10664547841r=1w=2
http://shepard.kicks-ass.net/~cc/
(I'm cc'ing
Leon Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The 3 ISOs provided to the club are only the 3 out of the 7 provided
into the boxed version.
[...] but yes there are some binaries on the first source CD
as I prefer removing some source than removing binary rpm).
So... reading between
The new 9.2 contribs jpackage directory, specifically:
rsync rsync://ftp.sunet.se:873/Mandrake/9.2/contrib/jpackage/i586/
contains 415 noarch RPMs of the form:
adaptx-0.9.6-1jpp.noarch.rpm
placed there by the JPackage (David Walluck) project.
What is this JPackage project?
J[ava
Le Samedi 18 Octobre 2003 16:13, Svetoslav Slavtchev a écrit :
Hi ,
the sebject tells it almost all,
with 2.6.0-test8 everything seems OK until i try to boot it :(
You need to undo a patch / changeset ( cf
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.5/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|Ch
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
Le Samedi 18 Octobre 2003 16:13, Svetoslav Slavtchev a écrit :
Hi ,
the sebject tells it almost all,
with 2.6.0-test8 everything seems OK until i try to boot it :(
You need to undo a patch / changeset ( cf
http
Buchan Milne wrote:
Felix Miata wrote:
OTOH, not being able to make a standard boot floppy is a serious
handicap to those who for whatever reason can't or don't boot from
the HD, and don't have CDRW or don't want to boot from CD each time.
Hmm, IMHO better to ensure that they
Hi ,
the sebject tells it almost all,
with 2.6.0-test8 everything seems OK until i try to boot it :(
upon boot the kernel can not mount the / fs
everything was OK until test7bk8, but between test7bk8 test8
there were some initrd changes ( which acording to lkml were in -mm
for at least 2-3
John Allen wrote:
On Friday 17 October 2003 12:17, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[snipped]
Get a bigger floppy disk, or use ext2 filesystems only, or provide a
patch to make smaller kernels.
Yes; but who is responsible for this.
Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
FWIW, this exact same problem also existed in 9.1, so it is not a 9.2
regression.
well not exactly
in 9.1 the problem was only with xfs (module is ~300k)
Disagree. I am talking about a vanilla ext2 install of 9.1 - it cannot
produce a boot floppy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
I thought much about testing the 2.6 kernel on my 9.1 install...
I read in this list, some weeks ago, something about changing in modutils
(or similar), so my question is:
When I want to play a bit with 2.6, what do I need else to
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 23:35, Thomas Backlund wrote:
Hi,
all of you with an nVidia nForce2 or Via KT400 board..
please try this one out...
What should we be trying to test specifically?
whether you can boot with acpi enabled, and if so
does usb work when acpi is enabled.
in
Svetoslav Slavtchev kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Lauantai 11 Lo
kakuu
2003 11:46):
[...]
1.) it would be good to update the acpi to the latest release.
it would probably solve most of the acpi irq problems for most KT400
Nforce2
boards with USB or onboard LAN
acpi
Hi,
all of you with an nVidia nForce2 or Via KT400 board..
please try this one out...
I've been running this kernel for ~24hours,
and no problems yet so ACPI seem finally to be fixed
for nForce2... and native IDE UDMA133 is not bad either...
... and there is some other fun stuff
Hi,
all of you with an nVidia nForce2 or Via KT400 board..
please try this one out...
I've been running this kernel for ~24hours,
and no problems yet so ACPI seem finally to be fixed
for nForce2... and native IDE UDMA133 is not bad either...
... and there is some other fun stuff
Hi,
all of you with an nVidia nForce2 or Via KT400 board..
please try this one out...
I've been running this kernel for ~24hours,
and no problems yet so ACPI seem finally to be fixed
for nForce2... and native IDE UDMA133 is not bad either...
... and there is some other fun
Hi,
I hadn't had the time to test the following kernel on IA-32, interested
people may find it at:
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/kernel/
Non AMD64-specific changes include:
* Fri Oct 10 2003 Gwenole Beauchesne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2.4.22-12mdk
- Various updates to PDC
Hi,
I hadn't had the time to test the following kernel on IA-32, interested
people may find it at:
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gbeauchesne/kernel/
Non AMD64-specific changes include:
* Fri Oct 10 2003 Gwenole Beauchesne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2.4.22-12mdk
- Various
Le mer 08/10/2003 à 22:58, Keld Jørn Simonsen a écrit :
A request here: the screenshots should be in the local language, if
possible. To newbies, it is important that the interfaces are in their
native language. And this is furthermore one of Mandrakes strengths,
Mandrake is more
Thomas Backlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
# urpmi lm_sensors
# dmidecode
and post the info from Handle 0x, Handle 0x0001, Handle 0x0002,
along with the info of what or how it's broken,
and what you need to use to get the system working... such as acpi=off,
noapic,
Warly wrote:
- We though a bit late in the 9.2 developement process to split cooker
ml, we
should do it now.
- What could we do, as a community, to increase the acceptance of
mandrakelinux?
Boxes on the store shelves, and included at least as an option with far
more new PC's.
Le dim 28/09/2003 à 19:44, Keld Jørn Simonsen a écrit :
One thing I saw which could enhance the availablilty of Mandrake was to
make an alliance with a major disk vendor, eg. Maxtor, to preinstalle
mandrake on a number of disks - free of charge. I think this is what
Lindows have done with
1 - 100 of 303 matches
Mail list logo
