I was setting up a chroot environment tonight and I did
'urpmi --root /mnt/newroot kmail'
and XFree86 did not get installed. Is this normal or correct?
you need XFree86-libs to run X11 programs and XFree86 to run them on
local display. You may as well want to run them on remote display
I was setting up a chroot environment tonight and I did
'urpmi --root /mnt/newroot kmail'
and XFree86 did not get installed. Is this normal or correct?
--
/g
Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx
rsync-plus.
The documentation of rsync-plus on my web site (see sig) has been
updated so as to now include instructions for executing the rsync-plus
perl modules.
Thanks for bringing this oversight to my attention.
To cause rsync-plus to download Mandrake for all languages, just don't
I installed fresh from my sunet cooker rsync about three days ago. Last
night (around 02:00 UTC) I freshened my rsync, then did the following:
1-urpmi.addmedia --update cooker-updates
file://mnt/nfs/ax5t3/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS with ../base/hdlist.cz
2-urpmi -a
3-urpmi -v --auto-select
4-urpmi
Felix, et al,
Are you not aware of our very popular fastest Mandrake downloader? It
will always beat the use of raw rsync when there are updates to
download. See sig.
It properly downloads updated kernel RPMs usually distributed in
Mandrake Updates. These are correctly installed as
Ron Stodden wrote:
Are you not aware of our very popular fastest Mandrake downloader? It
will always beat the use of raw rsync when there are updates to
download. See sig.
It properly downloads updated kernel RPMs usually distributed in
Mandrake Updates. These are correctly installed
Ron Stodden wrote:
Felix, et al,
Are you not aware of our very popular fastest Mandrake downloader? It
will always beat the use of raw rsync when there are updates to
download. See sig.
I can vouch for the rsync scripts Ron has. I have switched to that for
syncing with cooker.
-randy
Felix Miata wrote:
I don't use Lilo. I don't want additional Grub stanzas simply because I
installed a newer kernel either. Why should I need the old after
upgrading?
Because occasionally a newer kernel can cause problems. Plus having two
different versions of the kernel can help checkout
Felix Miata kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika Lauantai 20 Syyskuu 2003
20:47):
Ron Stodden wrote:
Are you not aware of our very popular fastest Mandrake downloader? It
will always beat the use of raw rsync when there are updates to
download. See sig.
It properly downloads updated
On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 17:27, Felix Miata wrote:
I installed fresh from my sunet cooker rsync about three days ago. Last
night (around 02:00 UTC) I freshened my rsync, then did the following:
1-urpmi.addmedia --update cooker-updates
file://mnt/nfs/ax5t3/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS with
Packages tend to be propagated to mirrors before the hdlists,
so if you happen to catch a mirror while it's busy updating, you may
well find a situation where the hdlist it has no longer reflects the
packages it has. Thus the missing packages (these would be ones that had
been updated twice since
Le Mardi 05 Août 2003 22:06, Lea Gris a écrit :
Hi,
Why is cups-drivers dependant on XFree86 ?
What if I want to setup a network printer server without XFree ?
urpmi cups-drivers
Pour satisfaire les dépendances, les paquetages suivants vont être
installés (39 Mo):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Why is cups-drivers dependant on XFree86 ?
What if I want to setup a network printer server without XFree ?
urpmi cups-drivers
Pour satisfaire les dépendances, les paquetages suivants vont être
installés (39 Mo):
XFree86-libs-4.3-5mdk.i586
On Tuesday 05 August 2003 22:06, Lea Gris wrote:
Hi,
Why is cups-drivers dependant on XFree86 ?
What if I want to setup a network printer server without XFree ?
urpmi cups-drivers
Pour satisfaire les dépendances, les paquetages suivants vont être
installés (39 Mo):
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
François, this still seems to be here:
$ rpm -q urpmi perl-URPM
urpmi-4.4-8mdk
perl-URPM-0.91-12mdk
$ rpm -q LinPopUp linpopup
LinPopUp-1.2.0-3mdk
package linpopup is not installed
$ urpmf --obsoletes LinPopUp
linpopup:LinPopUp
$ urpmf --provides
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Buchan Milne wrote:
François Pons wrote:
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But I want 'urpmi --auto-select' to update it ...
Strange, the obsoletes should have indicated to urpmi to updated
LinPopUp using
linpopup, which is what is
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But I want 'urpmi --auto-select' to update it ...
Strange, the obsoletes should have indicated to urpmi to updated LinPopUp using
linpopup, which is what is requested...
François.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 16:25:51 +0200
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why does the obsoleting package not get installed over the obsoleted
package?
Name change to linpopup
Both pkg provide Only LinPopUp but with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
François Pons wrote:
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But I want 'urpmi --auto-select' to update it ...
Strange, the obsoletes should have indicated to urpmi to updated
LinPopUp using
linpopup, which is what is requested...
And I want to
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 16:25:51 +0200
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why does the obsoleting package not get installed over the obsoleted
package?
Name change to linpopup
Both pkg provide Only LinPopUp but with name change linpopup Should also
provide LinPopUp = %version-%release
urpmi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
$ rpm -q LinPopUp
LinPopUp-1.2.0-3mdk
$ urpmq -r LinPopUp
linpopup-2.0.1-1mdk|LinPopUp-1.2.0-3mdk
# urpmi LinPopUp
Everything already installed
$ rpm -qp --obsoletes linpopup-2.0.1-1mdk.i586.rpm
LinPopUp
Why does the obsoleting package not get
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 16:25:51 +0200
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why does the obsoleting package not get installed over the obsoleted
package?
Name change to linpopup
Both pkg provide Only LinPopUp but with name change linpopup Should also
provide LinPopUp = %version-%release
urpmi
Juan,
I'm working a bit on new kernel-multimedia again and noticed you removed
PF_MEMDIE from the mdk kernel. This may cause a task not to die under OOM?
According to this, you agreed to that:
http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2003-01/1165.html
Although, I guess this situation is not
On Sat, 07 Jun 2003 15:13:11 +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
I would personally like a single framework for configuration, but all
frameworks i found in 13 years working on unix systems do suck far
more than vi.
The reason they all suck worse than vi is because they all aim far too
low. They all
On Wed Jun 04 14:14 -0400, Jason Straight wrote:
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 02:06 pm, Adam Williamson wrote:
Doesn't ifplugd also solve the problem some saw where, if they happened
to be disconnected from the network for some reason, it would sit there
on boot trying to get an IP address for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Levi Ramsey wrote:
On Wed Jun 04 14:14 -0400, Jason Straight wrote:
Perhaps during install asking if the system will be used as a server
it should
not have ifplugd?
I've proposed it before, but here goes again:
Why not have multiple editions of
__
Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/yplus/yoffer.html
Quoting Geoff Sheldrake [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
__
Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/yplus/yoffer.html
you are not the only one :((
Ok, now that I've taken time to collect myself and calm the fsck down.
Why is ifplugd default?
If it's for laptop users who switch network locations:
1. Why build the distro for laptops when more use it on desktops?
2. Who ever switches network cables and needs to have it reconfigured for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Straight wrote:
Ok, now that I've taken time to collect myself and calm the fsck down.
Why is ifplugd default?
If it's for laptop users who switch network locations:
1. Why build the distro for laptops when more use it on desktops?
Let's
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 01:42 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
Jason Straight wrote:
Ok, now that I've taken time to collect myself and calm the fsck down.
Why is ifplugd default?
If it's for laptop users who switch network locations:
1. Why build the distro for laptops when more use it on
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 18:42, Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Straight wrote:
Ok, now that I've taken time to collect myself and calm the fsck down.
Why is ifplugd default?
If it's for laptop users who switch network locations:
1. Why build
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 02:06 pm, Adam Williamson wrote:
Doesn't ifplugd also solve the problem some saw where, if they happened
to be disconnected from the network for some reason, it would sit there
on boot trying to get an IP address for five minutes? ISTR that's one of
its functions,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Straight wrote:
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 01:42 pm, Buchan Milne wrote:
2. Who ever switches network cables and needs to have it reconfigured for
them?
Users (ie not admins).
I mean how often does someone really travel to another location
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason Straight wrote:
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 02:06 pm, Adam Williamson wrote:
Perhaps during install asking if the system will be used as a server
it should
not have ifplugd?
Well, it is there in the network config dialog if you run it in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 11:02, Jason Straight wrote:
I'm not saying drop it - but why (by default) configure mdk install for
laptops? If that's the case why not have APM configured to suspend after 10
mins of inactivity? Or configure the system
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 12:02 pm, Jason Straight wrote:
I wish it would just
leave them alone - if I configure something my way I don't expect some
program to go and take the liberty of changing it for what it thinks I
want.
I agree with this part 1% ! !
After trying Red Hat 8 and
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
UTC-8 is presented by Shanghai, it is very strange. Beijing is
the capital of China. So, there is no reason that Beijing is not
in the list.
I want to file a bug, but I don't know which packages are
related. Who can help me?
Ottawa is
Mandrake Simplified Chinese [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
UTC-8 is presented by Shanghai, it is very strange. Beijing is the
capital of China. So, there is no reason that Beijing is not in the list.
I want to file a bug, but I don't know which packages are related. Who
can help me?
Timezones
UTF-8 is presented by Shanghai, it is very strange. Beijing is the
capital of China. So, there is no reason that Beijing is not in the list.
I want to file a bug, but I don't know which packages are related. Who
can help me?
Thanx.
UTC-8 is presented by Shanghai, it is very strange. Beijing is the
capital of China. So, there is no reason that Beijing is not in the list.
I want to file a bug, but I don't know which packages are related. Who
can help me?
Thanx.
On 2003.05.27 12:22, Mandrake Simplified Chinese wrote:
UTC-8 is presented by Shanghai, it is very strange. Beijing is the
capital of China. So, there is no reason that Beijing is not in the list.
I want to file a bug, but I don't know which packages are related. Who
can help me?
Ottawa is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Austin wrote:
On 2003.05.27 12:22, Mandrake Simplified Chinese wrote:
UTC-8 is presented by Shanghai, it is very strange. Beijing is the
capital of China. So, there is no reason that Beijing is not in the list.
I want to file a bug, but I don't
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 18:58, Buchan Milne wrote:
I guess GMT is covered by London?
GMT doesn't use summertime IIRC. London does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
andre wrote:
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 18:58, Buchan Milne wrote:
I guess GMT is covered by London?
GMT doesn't use summertime IIRC. London does
I should have added a ;-).
Buchan
(girlfriend currently in UK, with daylight-saving so there's only 1
Le Mardi 27 Mai 2003 21:03, andre a écrit :
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 18:58, Buchan Milne wrote:
I guess GMT is covered by London?
GMT doesn't use summertime IIRC. London does
GMT is the former date.
Now, the time is UTC (Universal Time Coordinated)
A very good documentation is found in
måndagen den 24 mars 2003 11.24 skrev Oden Eriksson:
måndagen den 24 mars 2003 10.57 skrev Marcel Pol:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 08:14:53 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do we still have the pspell package(s) in the distro? It
conflicts with aspell, and I've heard from
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 08:14:53 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do we still have the pspell package(s) in the distro? It conflicts
with aspell, and I've heard from others that aspell provides a pspell
library. Also, nothing in the distro appears to require the pspell
måndagen den 24 mars 2003 10.57 skrev Marcel Pol:
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 08:14:53 +0100
Oden Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do we still have the pspell package(s) in the distro? It conflicts
with aspell, and I've heard from others that aspell provides a pspell
library. Also,
Why do we still have the pspell package(s) in the distro? It conflicts
with aspell, and I've heard from others that aspell provides a pspell
library. Also, nothing in the distro appears to require the pspell
packages.
måndagen den 24 mars 2003 01.43 skrev David Walser:
Why do we still have the pspell package(s) in the distro? It conflicts
with aspell, and I've heard from others that aspell provides a pspell
library. Also, nothing in the distro appears to require the pspell
packages.
php-spell
--
Current apache2 conf load mod_cgi module, whereas documentation advises to use
mod_cgid on Unix platform. They only talk of performance issues, but i was
unable to run some CGI script with long output using mod_cgi.
Just commenting LoadModule statement for mod_cgi and uncommenting LoadModule
Is this a forgotten? Why kdeedu is not included in any of the 3 cds in rc2?
--
Francisco Alcaraz Ariza
Departamento de Biología Vegetal
Universidad de Murcia
E-30100 Murcia
España (Spain)
John Allen wrote:
It is dhclient. You will need to do a man dhclient.conf
and create a suitable dhclient.conf file.
Again I will say that this is ridiculous, can we not just go back to dhcpcd as
the default DHCP client.
I'd like to second this.
I run linux at work and home and have a laptop I
On Monday 03 March 2003 03:45, Greg Meyer wrote:
I have been going over this and over this on my machine and no matter what
I change, I cannot set a hostname on a machine when dhcp is being used. It
will only use the name supplied by dhcp server, which is not what I want.
Is it
On Monday 03 March 2003 03:19 am, John Allen wrote:
Is it tmdns/zeroconf or dhclient?
It is dhclient. You will need to do a man dhclient.conf
and create a suitable dhclient.conf file.
Why should a distro that is supposed to be easy for newbies require one to man
dhclient.conf and manually
I have been going over this and over this on my machine and no matter what I
change, I cannot set a hostname on a machine when dhcp is being used. It
will only use the name supplied by dhcp server, which is not what I want.
Is it tmdns/zeroconf or dhclient?
Is it desired behavior to not allow
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 21:45, Greg Meyer wrote:
I have been going over this and over this on my machine and no matter what I
change, I cannot set a hostname on a machine when dhcp is being used. It
will only use the name supplied by dhcp server, which is not what I want.
Try setting both
On Sunday 02 March 2003 10:53 pm, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 21:45, Greg Meyer wrote:
I have been going over this and over this on my machine and no matter
what I change, I cannot set a hostname on a machine when dhcp is being
used. It will only use the name supplied by
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 21:58, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 02 March 2003 10:53 pm, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 21:45, Greg Meyer wrote:
I have been going over this and over this on my machine and no matter
what I change, I cannot set a hostname on a machine when dhcp is
On Sunday 02 March 2003 11:19 pm, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
If all those are yes, then you'll need to check the logs and see what
errors if any are coming back to you.
Of course the problem could be the server. Have you been able to set
the hostname before?
That is an affirmative on 9.0,
Shift [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
I just upgrade my Mandrake and when I restart my X session my kdm has been
replaced by an HORRIBLE login manager.
Can you explain me why Mandrake has patch the original kdm to changed it in
this fucking DM that I hate ?
Do you want to be worst than
Le Lundi 3 Février 2003 13:12, Warly a écrit :
So REMOVE THIS FUCKING LOGIN MANAGER OR YOU WILL LOSE ME AND MOREOVER
MONEY !!
What a very smart way to lead kde team to answer you.
Maybe KDE team could answer to other people then ?
For my part, i don't see any advantage over original one.
En réponse à Warly [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Shift [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So REMOVE THIS FUCKING LOGIN MANAGER OR YOU WILL LOSE ME AND MOREOVER
MONEY !!
What a very smart way to lead kde team to answer you.
--
Warly
Hi Warly,
Ok, the way to make react cooker users was not the best one
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 13:49, Franck Quélain wrote:
En réponse à Warly [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Shift [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So REMOVE THIS FUCKING LOGIN MANAGER OR YOU WILL LOSE ME AND MOREOVER
MONEY !!
What a very smart way to lead kde team to answer you.
--
Warly
Hi
En réponse à Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 13:49, Franck Quélain wrote:
En réponse à Warly [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Shift [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So REMOVE THIS FUCKING LOGIN MANAGER OR YOU WILL LOSE ME AND
MOREOVER
MONEY !!
What a very smart way to
On Mon 2003-02-03 at 14:49:01 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Ok, the way to make react cooker users was not the best one but it
has worked and that was what I wanted to do.
Ah, well, simply assuming causality is a bit far-fetched here. You
could also say that Mandrake changed it despite
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Shift wrote:
Moreover I noticed that the login input field has been removed. The user has
only the right to choose a user in a list.
But HOW this user will do if the linux box has thousnds of users
It is an horrible waste of time :(
No, I had setup kdm previously to
On Saturday 01 February 2003 10:12, Buchan Milne wrote:
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Shift wrote:
Moreover I noticed that the login input field has been removed. The user
has only the right to choose a user in a list.
But HOW this user will do if the linux box has thousnds of users
It is an
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 01:57, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
So use GDM. You can use GDM to login to KDE - unless they changed that
also.
There's a Mandrake theme for GDM...has been since 9.0, I think. It's
quite nice.
--
adamw
Le Samedi 1 Février 2003 02:57, Lonnie Borntreger a écrit :
So use GDM. You can use GDM to login to KDE - unless they changed that
also.
GDM use gtk and if it is not installed (Because I can use only QT apps if I
want) and I don't want to install it just for that :)
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 11:41, Shift wrote:
Le Samedi 1 Février 2003 02:57, Lonnie Borntreger a écrit :
So use GDM. You can use GDM to login to KDE - unless they changed that
also.
GDM use gtk and if it is not installed (Because I can use only QT apps if I
want) and I don't want to
Le Samedi 1 Février 2003 13:00, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 11:41, Shift wrote:
Le Samedi 1 Février 2003 02:57, Lonnie Borntreger a écrit :
So use GDM. You can use GDM to login to KDE - unless they changed that
also.
GDM use gtk and if it is not installed (Because
On Sat, 2003-02-01 at 07:37, Shift wrote:
But if Mandrake tools used QT it will be more better because regarding the
time gtk1 apps take to be migrated to gtk2 we will have gtk1 and gtk2 install
in our box for years !! But that's an other troll^Wsubject
GTK1.2 is only 1.8 meg, and it's
kde, or when in gnome with kdm also. And so that when runing kdm I can
choose New login or whatever better fits for fast user switching.
BTW, the code for that is mostly in there (it was actually working for a
while during KDE3.1 development) -- including a KMenu New Session entry;
the same
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Maks Orlovich wrote:
kde, or when in gnome with kdm also. And so that when runing kdm I can
choose New login or whatever better fits for fast user switching.
BTW, the code for that is mostly in there (it was actually working for a
while during KDE3.1 development) --
Le Samedi 1 Février 2003 02:38, Jason Straight a écrit :
Hehe, thanks for having the balls to say it the way I wanted to. I have no
problem with mandrake having their own login manager, I don't even care if
it's default if that's the way they want to go, but I have to admit that
this type of
Hi all,
I just upgrade my Mandrake and when I restart my X session my kdm has been
replaced by an HORRIBLE login manager.
Can you explain me why Mandrake has patch the original kdm to changed it in
this fucking DM that I hate ?
Do you want to be worst than RedHat who patch KDE ? Everybody has
Le sam 01/02/2003 à 02:13, Shift a écrit :
Hi all,
hi shift
I just upgrade my Mandrake and when I restart my X session my kdm has been
replaced by an HORRIBLE login manager.
Can you explain me why Mandrake has patch the original kdm to changed it in
this fucking DM that I hate ?
Im
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:13:45AM +0100, Shift wrote:
Hi all,
So REMOVE THIS FUCKING LOGIN MANAGER OR YOU WILL LOSE ME AND MOREOVER MONEY !!
I can't speak for MandrakeSoft, but my feelings are So long, and don't
let the door hit your ass on the way out.
--
Ryan T. Sammartino
Yes kdm is a part of KDE and guess what. THEY CHANGED IT NOT MANDRAKE! So live
with it. I compiled a couple of the release candidates, betas, and even
alpha's and this change was made from early on. If you'd chosen to compile it
earlier you wouldn't been able to provide some input. But yah
I digress. After reading laurent's post I decided to log off and see what all
the hubbub is about. THAT is definitely not KDE's new login manager. SHIT
that thing is ugly. Mandrake please, change it back.
On Friday 31 January 2003 20:11, Laurent Culioli wrote:
Le sam 01/02/2003 à 02:13, Shift a
On Friday 31 January 2003 6:13 pm, Shift wrote:
Hi all,
I just upgrade my Mandrake and when I restart my X session my kdm has
been replaced by an HORRIBLE login manager.
I don't agree with the animosity--brand KDM away all you want--but I do
agree that the two-stage login thing is *quite*
Le jeu 30/01/2003 à 02:29, orville a écrit :
I digress. After reading laurent's post I decided to log off and see what all
the hubbub is about. THAT is definitely not KDE's new login manager. SHIT
that thing is ugly. Mandrake please, change it back.
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 19:27, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
On Friday 31 January 2003 6:13 pm, Shift wrote:
Hi all,
I just upgrade my Mandrake and when I restart my X session my kdm has
been replaced by an HORRIBLE login manager.
I don't agree with the animosity--brand KDM away all you
Le Samedi 1 Février 2003 02:37, Lonnie Borntreger a écrit :
KDM branding can be accomplished with a simple kdmrc change to use a
Mandrake specific background image along with the Mandrake star logo.
No change needs to be made to KDM itself.
Restart your X server you will see that it is not
Le Samedi 1 Février 2003 02:54, Shift a écrit :
Modifying a big part of antother project is not a patch but a FORK.
It is very bad and it is against free software philosophy (IMHO)
Presicion :
What I want to say is that replacing a big part of a program and allways call
it with the original
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 08:17 pm, orville wrote:
Yes kdm is a part of KDE and guess what. THEY CHANGED IT NOT MANDRAKE! So
live with it. I compiled a couple of the release candidates, betas, and
even alpha's and this change was made from early
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 31 January 2003 08:37 pm, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
KDM branding can be accomplished with a simple kdmrc change to use a
Mandrake specific background image along with the Mandrake star logo.
No change needs to be made to KDM itself.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 31 January 2003 08:13 pm, Shift wrote:
Hi all,
I just upgrade my Mandrake and when I restart my X session my kdm has been
replaced by an HORRIBLE login manager.
Can you explain me why Mandrake has patch the original kdm to changed it in
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 19:54, Shift wrote:
Le Samedi 1 Février 2003 02:37, Lonnie Borntreger a écrit :
KDM branding can be accomplished with a simple kdmrc change to use a
Mandrake specific background image along with the Mandrake star logo.
No change needs to be made to KDM itself.
On Saturday 01 February 2003 01:31, Laurent Culioli wrote:
Le jeu 30/01/2003 à 02:29, orville a écrit :
I digress. After reading laurent's post I decided to log off and see what
all the hubbub is about. THAT is definitely not KDE's new login manager.
SHIT that thing is ugly. Mandrake
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 19:44, Jason Straight wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 31 January 2003 08:37 pm, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
KDM branding can be accomplished with a simple kdmrc change to use a
Mandrake specific background image along with the Mandrake
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 6:29 pm, orville wrote:
I digress. After reading laurent's post I decided to log off and see
what all the hubbub is about. THAT is definitely not KDE's new login
Another two big problems with this monster:
1) No more familiar keyboard only typing:
Le Samedi 1 Février 2003 02:13, Shift a écrit :
Hi all,
I just upgrade my Mandrake and when I restart my X session my kdm has been
replaced by an HORRIBLE login manager.
Can you explain me why Mandrake has patch the original kdm to changed it in
this fucking DM that I hate ?
Do you want to
drakbackup wont run without functional X DISPLAY. Why is that? It is a
console app afterall.
--
Ernest Beinrohr, OERNii
eAdmin @ AxonPro.sk, http://www.AxonPro.sk
+421-2-62410360, +421-903-482603== NOVE TELEFONNE CISLO
HomePage: http://www.oernii.sk
Ernest Beinrohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
drakbackup wont run without functional X DISPLAY. Why is that? It is a
console app afterall.
why don't you use rsync instead in that case ?
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Ernest Beinrohr wrote:
drakbackup wont run without functional X DISPLAY. Why is that? It is a
console app afterall.
Actually it's both. It used to run from console, but must have gotten
broken in the move to gtk2. I'll have a look.
Stew Benedict
--
MandrakeSoft
hi,
after upgrading some of our RH based servers from proftpd 1.2.5 to 1.2.7 I
noticed that cooker still has proftpd-1.2.5-3mdk
Is there a special reason for this, as 1.2.5 has some security issues?
udo
I just sent the magic command
SET cooker DIGEST to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The reply was that cooker does not allow digestification.
Why in the world not?
Dean
1 - 100 of 611 matches
Mail list logo
