I tried to install the FireGL X1 drivers from ATI, which are supposed to
work with a Radeon 8500 (R200) and XFree 4.3.
Unfortunately I could not compile a working driver for Mandrake 9.1. It
fails patching drmP.h, then compiles the fglrx.o driver, but it cannot be
loaded. I did not look what part
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I managed to install the newest drivers without problems, but when I enable
Twinview on two flat panels, the system locks up HARD. Previous version
worked fine and still works after downgrading .
Seems, that nVidia needs to improve their QA a
Nvidia has a nice PR. They have a forum for Linux users, and a developper
who answers questions, give patches and listen to users and their bug
reports. http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?s=forumid=14
I always preferred ATI for their free community support. However their PR is
://www.xig.com/
http://gatos.sourceforge.net/
http://pdownload.mii.instacontent.net/ati/drivers/fglrx-glc22-4.2.0-2.5.1.i5
86.rpm
~Ken
- Original Message -
From: Eric Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] New Nvidia
- Original Message -
From: Ken Mays [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] New Nvidia drivers for Linux (4349)
You may not have read ATI's website on the Linux support issue. They
support
Linux
, 2003 6:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] New Nvidia drivers for Linux (4349)
- Original Message -
From: Ken Mays [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] New Nvidia drivers for Linux (4349)
You may
- Original Message -
From: Ken Mays [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] New Nvidia drivers for Linux (4349)
Starting from here:
http://www.ati.com/developer/altoschart.pdf
http://www.xfree86.org/4.3.0/radeon.4.html
- Original Message -
From: Ken Mays [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Eric Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] New Nvidia drivers for Linux (4349)
I'll investigate this further. That ATI driver should work under XFree86
v4.3.0 and Mandrake
] New Nvidia drivers for Linux (4349)
- Original Message -
From: Ken Mays [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] New Nvidia drivers for Linux (4349)
Starting from here:
http://www.ati.com/developer/altoschart.pdf
http
Try: rpm --rebuild *.rpm
~Ken
- Original Message -
From: Eric Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:25 AM
Subject: ATI drivers for XF4.3 (FireGL but 8500 should work) (WAS: Re:
[Cooker] New Nvidia drivers for Linux (4349))
- Original
Try: rpm --rebuild *.rpm
~Ken
I'll give atry thanks, but I don't think it'll help. The problem is that it
looks for a file in the kernel headers and tries to apply a patch, in 2
different locations, but fails. I think the 2.4.21 kernel in mdk is modified
so that it cannot do it. The best way
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 01:19, Francisco Alcaraz wrote:
I have had a lot of problem with this new release. One of the times I lost the
3d; the second try I get a switched off screen.
At the moment I have returned to textar Nvidia rpms.
Could anyone be so kind as to explain all the step to
Ainsi parlait Levi Ramsey :
On Tue Apr 01 0:01 +0200, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
On Monday 31 March 2003 23:41, villin wrote:
Hello,
it seems that nvidia is trying to make a step not to open source but to
update easily it's drivers under linux...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Ainsi parlait Levi Ramsey :
Legality wasn't really the motivation. The original decision was to avoid
everything present in mdk commercial section, to avoid redundancy
first, and
to keep boxed set an added value.
Strange i have had no problem to use them. The old driver was running.
No need to remove it.
Just switch to runlevel 3 and launch the script.
Say that i want to compile and voila. And a few seconds later everything
was ok (Geforce 4 Ti 4200).
No need to reboot. Just had to change the rights on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
villin wrote:
Strange i have had no problem to use them. The old driver was running.
No need to remove it.
Just switch to runlevel 3 and launch the script.
Say that i want to compile and voila. And a few seconds later everything
was ok (Geforce
Buchan Milne wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
villin wrote:
Strange i have had no problem to use them. The old driver was running.
No need to remove it.
Just switch to runlevel 3 and launch the script.
Say that i want to compile and voila. And a few seconds later
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 07:53 am, Olivier Villin wrote:
Of course i agree with you it's not like we want secure and open source.
Olivier.
Did you all see that nVidia's license now allows redistribution for the linux
drivers?
2.1.2 Linux Exception. Notwithstanding the foregoing terms of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greg Meyer wrote:
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 07:53 am, Olivier Villin wrote:
Of course i agree with you it's not like we want secure and open source.
Olivier.
Did you all see that nVidia's license now allows redistribution for
the linux
drivers?
On Tue, 01 Apr 2003 07:26:33 -0800 (PST), villin wrote:
Strange i have had no problem to use them. The old driver was running.
No need to remove it.
Just switch to runlevel 3 and launch the script.
Say that i want to compile and voila. And a few seconds later everything
was ok (Geforce
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 09:22, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 10:13, Edward Tandi wrote:
On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 01:19, Francisco Alcaraz wrote:
I have had a lot of problem with this new release. One of the times I
lost the
Buchan,
I have gone to the mandrake club and I haven't seen any link to the NVIDIA
news rpms. I am having lot of problems trying to install the Nvidia run file,
even following the Mandrake experience recomendation
(http://icculus.org/~dolson/mdkxp/?c=ttrls/nvidianew), in the best case I
have
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Francisco Alcaraz wrote:
I have gone to the mandrake club and I haven't seen any link to the NVIDIA
news rpms. I am having lot of problems trying to install the Nvidia run file,
even following the Mandrake experience recomendation
Thanks a lot Buchan;
Regards
El Miércoles, 2 de Abril de 2003 00:17, Buchan Milne escribió:
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Francisco Alcaraz wrote:
I have gone to the mandrake club and I haven't seen any link to the
NVIDIA news rpms. I am having lot of problems trying to install the
Nvidia run
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 00:17:11 +0200 (SAST)
Buchan Milne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should be able to install them quite easily with urpmi though
(using --wget option at present until fixed urpmi is out)
Yes, but these are now 'old' driver Not the new 4349 drivers.
The only rpms available for
Le Mardi 1 Avril 2003 15:57, Greg Meyer a écrit :
Did you all see that nVidia's license now allows redistribution for the
linux drivers?
2.1.2 Linux Exception. Notwithstanding the foregoing terms of Section
2.1.1, SOFTWARE designed exclusively for use on the Linux operating system
may be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 31 March 2003 23:41, villin wrote:
Hello,
it seems that nvidia is trying to make a step not to open source but to
update easily it's drivers under linux...
http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?IO=linux_display_ia32_1.0-4349
I'll try them asap
On 04.01, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 31 March 2003 23:41, villin wrote:
Hello,
it seems that nvidia is trying to make a step not to open source but to
update easily it's drivers under linux...
Oliver,
The source is still there. You need to use the --extract-only option. It
would appear that NVidia have done a good job in making the install much
easier for the average user. I use a custom kernel, and it
built/installed a new module without problem.
Ed-T.
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 22:41,
I have had a lot of problem with this new release. One of the times I lost the
3d; the second try I get a switched off screen.
At the moment I have returned to textar Nvidia rpms.
Could anyone be so kind as to explain all the step to have it runing under
9.1?
Thansk so much in advance
El
On Tue Apr 01 0:01 +0200, Per Øyvind Karlsen wrote:
On Monday 31 March 2003 23:41, villin wrote:
Hello,
it seems that nvidia is trying to make a step not to open source but to
update easily it's drivers under linux...
http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?IO=linux_display_ia32_1.0-4349
I'll
Leon Brooks wrote:
Not on modern video chips. The oscillators continue to churn, however they're
not gated through to the address counters. No point in chewing extra
bandwidth and making extra heat
and needing larger video memory
which a very simple gating arrangement can
avoid it.
On Sunday 15 December 2002 02:46, J.A. Magallon wrote:
On 2002.12.14 andre wrote:
On Saturday 14 December 2002 09:59, Lea Gris wrote:
This is a hardware feature not a driver software implementation. 128
bits graphic chips would have much much work addressing odd order of
bytes boundary
Murray J. Root wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 10:47:39AM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote:
Even more correct would be to add 30% to both H V pixels to allow for
the necessary blanked overscan during hsync and vsync pulses. This
is because the H V oscillators never stop.
See the video timings
On Monday 16 December 2002 07:27 am, Ron Stodden wrote:
Murray J. Root wrote:
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 10:47:39AM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote:
Even more correct would be to add 30% to both H V pixels to allow for
the necessary blanked overscan during hsync and vsync pulses. This
is because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
andre wrote:
On Friday 13 December 2002 18:38, Murray J. Root wrote:
To followup myself -
according to NVidia docs, 24bpp uses 32bpp, just the high order
8 bits are not used.
So the correct calculation is
1600*1200 pixels * 32bpp/8bits_per_byte /
On Saturday 14 December 2002 09:59, Lea Gris wrote:
This is a hardware feature not a driver software implementation. 128
bits graphic chips would have much much work addressing odd order of
bytes boundary (24bits 3 bytes) in memory even worse this would require
one more address line switch and
Em Qui 12 Dez 2002 22:08, gabor farkas escreveu:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 06:23:07PM +, Servio Tulio Pires Amarante wrote:
Here devfs did not create the /dev/nvidia*. After a modprobe nvidia, I
can start X.
yes, it's important that somehow the driver name changed from 'NVdriver'
to
Murray J. Root wrote:
So the correct calculation is
1600*1200 pixels * 32bpp/8bits_per_byte / (1024*1024 bytes_per_Meg) = 7.3M
Even more correct would be to add 30% to both H V pixels to allow for
the necessary blanked overscan during hsync and vsync pulses. This
is because the H V
On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 10:47:39AM +1100, Ron Stodden wrote:
Murray J. Root wrote:
So the correct calculation is
1600*1200 pixels * 32bpp/8bits_per_byte / (1024*1024 bytes_per_Meg) = 7.3M
Even more correct would be to add 30% to both H V pixels to allow for
the necessary blanked
On 2002.12.14 andre wrote:
On Saturday 14 December 2002 09:59, Lea Gris wrote:
This is a hardware feature not a driver software implementation. 128
bits graphic chips would have much much work addressing odd order of
bytes boundary (24bits 3 bytes) in memory even worse this would require
one
Somehow, I cannot use 1600x1200 with a color depth of 24 as before. It
says that the 32 megs of memory aren't enough. I had to lower the depth
to 16 to be able to use that resolution.
It was working fine with the previous version.
GeForce2 Integrated GPU
--
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you only have 32 megs of memory, you cant run in 1600x1200 24bit
color, here is why:
memreq = (1600 bit x 1200 bit x 24 bit) / (1024 x 1024) = 44 Megabyte.
No:
1600x1200x24 = 4608000 bits / 8 = 576 bytes = 5.5Megabytes
If you use 16 bit color:
memreq = (1600 bit x 1200 bit x 16 bit)
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:56:23PM +0100, Bruno Thomsen wrote:
Somehow, I cannot use 1600x1200 with a color depth of 24 as before. It
says that the 32 megs of memory aren't enough. I had to lower the depth
to 16 to be able to use that resolution.
It was working fine with the previous
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 12:17:10PM -0500, Murray J. Root wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 05:56:23PM +0100, Bruno Thomsen wrote:
Somehow, I cannot use 1600x1200 with a color depth of 24 as before. It
says that the 32 megs of memory aren't enough. I had to lower the depth
to 16 to be able
On Friday 13 December 2002 18:38, Murray J. Root wrote:
To followup myself -
according to NVidia docs, 24bpp uses 32bpp, just the high order
8 bits are not used.
So the correct calculation is
1600*1200 pixels * 32bpp/8bits_per_byte / (1024*1024 bytes_per_Meg) = 7.3M
I know that is true
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 08:56:29PM +0100, andre wrote:
On Friday 13 December 2002 18:38, Murray J. Root wrote:
To followup myself -
according to NVidia docs, 24bpp uses 32bpp, just the high order
8 bits are not used.
So the correct calculation is
1600*1200 pixels *
Has anyone been successful getting the new 4191 nvidia drivers to work on current
cooker?
I get a driver mod error and am dropped to shell.
I can revert to the 3123 drivers and without changing anything in my XF86Config-4 boot
to X without problem.
Charles
It's men
Charles A Edwards wrote:
Has anyone been successful getting the new 4191 nvidia drivers to work on current cooker?
I get a driver mod error and am dropped to shell.
I can revert to the 3123 drivers and without changing anything in my XF86Config-4 boot to X without problem.
Charles
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 14:53, francesco.melo wrote:
Charles A Edwards wrote:
Has anyone been successful getting the new 4191 nvidia drivers to work on current
cooker?
I get a driver mod error and am dropped to shell.
I can revert to the 3123 drivers and without changing anything in my
On Thursday 12 December 2002 13:53, francesco.melo wrote:
Charles A Edwards wrote:
Has anyone been successful getting the new 4191 nvidia drivers to work on
current cooker?
I get a driver mod error and am dropped to shell.
I can revert to the 3123 drivers and without changing anything in
John Allen wrote:
On Thursday 12 December 2002 13:53, francesco.melo wrote:
Charles A Edwards wrote:
Has anyone been successful getting the new 4191 nvidia drivers to work on
current cooker?
I get a driver mod error and am dropped to shell.
I can revert to the 3123 drivers and without
Here devfs did not create the /dev/nvidia*. After a modprobe nvidia, I can
start X.
Em Qui 12 Dez 2002 13:46, Charles A Edwards escreveu:
Has anyone been successful getting the new 4191 nvidia drivers to work on
current cooker?
I get a driver mod error and am dropped to shell.
I can
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 06:23:07PM +, Servio Tulio Pires Amarante wrote:
Here devfs did not create the /dev/nvidia*. After a modprobe nvidia, I can
start X.
yes, it's important that somehow the driver name changed from 'NVdriver'
to 'nvidia'
gabor
Em Qui 12 Dez 2002 13:46,
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 05:53, francesco.melo wrote:
Charles A Edwards wrote:
Has anyone been successful getting the new 4191 nvidia drivers to work on current
cooker?
I get a driver mod error and am dropped to shell.
I can revert to the 3123 drivers and without changing anything in my
On Thursday 12 December 2002 10:27 pm, francesco.melo wrote:
Need to re-compile if you have a kernel rev, or gcc rev different than the
RPM that is on NVIDIA's site. Get the source rpms and rebuild them (rpm
--rebuild /usr/src/.../NVIDIA*src.rpm)
I do that as a matter of habit, and it all
On Friday 13 December 2002 08:56 am, Quel Qun wrote:
Somehow, I cannot use 1600x1200 with a color depth of 24 as before. It
says that the 32 megs of memory aren't enough. I had to lower the depth
to 16 to be able to use that resolution.
It was working fine with the previous version.
On Thu, 2002-12-12 at 20:54, Leon Brooks wrote:
On Friday 13 December 2002 08:56 am, Quel Qun wrote:
Somehow, I cannot use 1600x1200 with a color depth of 24 as before. It
says that the 32 megs of memory aren't enough. I had to lower the depth
to 16 to be able to use that resolution.
It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leon Brooks wrote:
On Thursday 12 December 2002 10:27 pm, francesco.melo wrote:
Need to re-compile if you have a kernel rev, or gcc rev different than the
RPM that is on NVIDIA's site. Get the source rpms and rebuild them (rpm
--rebuild
Just to let you know that at least some credits are due to a guy
with nickname rcc from newsgroup alt.os.linux.mandrake.
Nice to see when efforts pay off :-))
If you are interested in evil proprietary software :-)
Since I am at work, haven't got the time to try on cooker yet.
Release Highlights for 1.0-2802:
* GeForce4 and Quadro4 Support (see products supported list)
* OpenGL® 1.3 with NVIDIA extensions
* Improved IGP and mobile support
On Thursday 07 March 2002 09:56, you wrote:
If you are interested in evil proprietary software :-)
Since I am at work, haven't got the time to try on cooker yet.
Release Highlights for 1.0-2802:
* Anisotropic filtering support
^^what the hell is that?
Danny
I put up a couple
J.P. Pasnak wrote:
On Thursday 07 March 2002 09:56, you wrote:
If you are interested in evil proprietary software :-)
Since I am at work, haven't got the time to try on cooker yet.
Release Highlights for 1.0-2802:
* Anisotropic filtering support
^^what the hell is that?
Danny
I
On Thursday 07 March 2002 19:08, you wrote:
I put up a couple of links to the explanation of anisotropic this morning:
http://www.warpedsystems.sk.ca/article.php?sid=521
Are you sure that explanation is the relevent one?
I suspect this explanation is the more relevent one...
These drivers sucked for me. Wolfenstein would completely freeze after about
2 minutes, I couldn't even ctrl-alt-printscreen-k, i had to reboot. Unreal
Tourney would also freeze, quake3 had messed up graphics and it would stop
reading from the keyboard after a minute or two and my fps would
Mark D'voo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2 minutes, I couldn't even ctrl-alt-printscreen-k, i had to reboot. Unreal
On a side note -- you don't need ctrl in the SysRq sequence, at least on
all PC keyboards I've seen so far.
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
J.A. Magallon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
For those interested:
http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?PAGE=linux
looks like there are many interesting things...
Check out: for some real linux-benchmarking, yes.
http://www.linuxhardware.org/features/01/11/30/212206.shtml
Cya, Han.
For those interested:
http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?PAGE=linux
looks like there are many interesting things...
--
J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you...
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.17-pre1
yahoo! New ones :) See any improvements b 4 I upgrade?
didn't see much of a performance gain, but you never know
mark
On Friday 30 November 2001 07:17, you wrote:
yahoo! New ones :) See any improvements b 4 I upgrade?
--
1:37am up 9:00, 0 users, load average: 0.09, 0.07, 0.07
On Thursday 29 November 2001 08:17 pm, you wrote:
yahoo! New ones :) See any improvements b 4 I upgrade?
1. OpenGL 1.3 support
2. DevFS support seems to be there
On 21 Sep 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
btw: i did a couple of rpm's for nvidia[1] you can find them at :
URL:https://kenobi.mandrakesoft.com/~chmou/nvidia/latest/
I know you don't support these RPMS, but maybe you can tell me why when I
rebuild from SRPMS from NVIDIA's site, the X server
:
Sent by: Subject: Re: [Cooker] new nVidia
drivers
cooker-owner@linux-ma
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
Le Vendredi 21 Septembre 2001 15:56, David Walluck scribit :
Unfortunately, these drivers aren't offered during the install. It could
be nice if install automatically connected to the NVIDIA FTP site and got
them.
Same for winmodmes too.
Le Jeudi 20 Septembre 2001 07:51, Borsenkow Andrej scribit :
http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?PAGE=linux
great indeed but still no devfs support :(
--
Copyleft Faber's prod. 2001
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
Le Jeudi 20 Septembre 2001 07:51, Borsenkow Andrej scribit :
http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?PAGE=linux
great indeed but still no devfs support :(
So I can't use them?
Oh and can Mandrake include them in Unsupported foldier ?
--
9:20pm up 27
On Thursday 20 September 2001 09:22 pm, you wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
Le Jeudi 20 Septembre 2001 07:51, Borsenkow Andrej scribit :
http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?PAGE=linux
great indeed but still no devfs support :(
So I can't use them?
Oh and can Mandrake
Le Vendredi 21 Septembre 2001 03:22, Yura Gusev scribit :
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
Le Jeudi 20 Septembre 2001 07:51, Borsenkow Andrej scribit :
http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?PAGE=linux
great indeed but still no devfs support :(
So I can't use them?
yes you can.
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Maks Orlovich wrote:
On Thursday 20 September 2001 09:22 pm, you wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
Le Jeudi 20 Septembre 2001 07:51, Borsenkow Andrej scribit :
http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?PAGE=linux
great indeed but still no devfs support
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
Le Vendredi 21 Septembre 2001 03:22, Yura Gusev scribit :
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
Le Jeudi 20 Septembre 2001 07:51, Borsenkow Andrej scribit :
http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?PAGE=linux
great indeed but still no devfs
The patch found at
http://www.cyber.com.au/users/ashridah/nvidia_devfs-patch_1.0-1512.patch
for 1512 seems to work on 1541 also. I will know (I hope) when I finally
reboot.
Salane
On Thursday 20 September 2001 10:20 pm, you wrote:
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Maks Orlovich wrote:
On Thursday 20
On 21 Sep 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
Yura Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you mean contrib ?
Don't know. I can be nice to have them. Check attachment.
no way !! to include them..
Is it personal? Some distributions include SRPMS with instructions how to
install them.
--
11:50pm
http://www.nvidia.com/view.asp?PAGE=linux
, May 17, 2001 5:08 PM
Subject: [Cooker] new nvidia drivers
http://www.nvidia.com/Products/OpenLinuxDwn.nsf/xfree86_40downloadmain?Open
Page
PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, May 17, 2001 5:08 PM
Subject: [Cooker] new nvidia drivers
http://www.nvidia.com/Products/OpenLinuxDwn.nsf/xfree86_40downloadmain?Open
Page
-
From: andre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, May 17, 2001 5:08 PM
Subject: [Cooker] new nvidia drivers
http://www.nvidia.com/Products/OpenLinuxDwn.nsf/xfree86_40downloadmain?O
pen
Page
Is it me or are the fonts now huge in kde?
On 05.18 pablito wrote:
anyone had any luck getting these to work? I get unresolved symbol errors
when I try to build from the source rpms and the Mandrake 8.0 version
doesn't work with my kernel 2-4-3-27.
I just got the tar.gz files and built them myself and everything went fine.
There
During the bombing raid on Sat, 19 May 2001 00:14:57 -0400, andre was heard
mumbling in fear:
On Friday 18 May 2001 15:23, you wrote:
http://www.nvidia.com/Products/OpenLinuxDwn.nsf/xfree86_40downloadmain?O
pen
Page
Is it me or are the fonts now huge in kde?
Nah,
On May 18, 2001 03:24 pm, you wrote:
On 05.18 pablito wrote:
anyone had any luck getting these to work? I get unresolved symbol
errors when I try to build from the source rpms and the Mandrake 8.0
version doesn't work with my kernel 2-4-3-27.
I just got the tar.gz files and built them
89 matches
Mail list logo
