Re: [Crm-sig] Question about test dataset

best, Øyvind > Am 09.08.2024 um 22:07 schrieb Øyvind Eide via Crm-sig : > > Dear all, > > for a student project, we would be helped a lot if we could get access to one > or more CRM datasets. We are looking for: > > - data in CRM which includes at least 100, prefe

[Crm-sig] Question about test dataset

Dear all, for a student project, we would be helped a lot if we could get access to one or more CRM datasets. We are looking for: - data in CRM which includes at least 100, preferably more than 1000 distinct places - use of further spatial modelling, e.g. as found in CRMgeo, are welcome, but n

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 490 -- E VOTE

YES I think it would be interesting to add an example from musical notation, but I do not have any available directly. This can anyway be done later if people agree it is a good idea. Regards, Øyvind > Am 10.05.2024 um 12:51 schrieb Eleni Tsouloucha via Crm-sig > : > > Dear all, > During

Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue, missing part of type

Dear Martin, E80 Part Removal has E7 Activity as a superclass, thus, a part removed without any agent being responsible is not intended it seems. As to accidents made by agents: we would have to distinguish between intentional act and accident in order to say accidents are not part removals.

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 576 (about ... entity of type)

Dear Martin, and all, if you are going to discuss aboutness I am really sorry I cannot be there and talk about it, but life is about many things, talking about teaching and semester start... Aboutness can be defined very wide (anything someone thinks and is willing to state relates to somethin

Re: [Crm-sig] E-VOTE: LRMoo F31 Performance and properties

YES. Out of curiosity: what does Subproperty of: Outside of CIDOC CRM scope for R81 mean? Øyvind > Am 30.07.2023 um 03:40 schrieb Pat Riva via Crm-sig : > > Hello all, > > During the SIG meeting #56 in May 2023 in Heraklion, the LRMoo WG presented a > new approach to performances (see here

Re: [Crm-sig] EXTENDED DEADLINE: E-VOTE: LRMoo R10 is member of (has member)

YES Øyvind > Am 29.07.2023 um 23:17 schrieb Pat Riva via Crm-sig : > > Hello all, > > Not having had any votes during this vacation period, I'm extending the > deadline to Sunday August 20. That is the beginning of the IFLA congress > where the BCM Review Group meeting will be held and we wil

[Crm-sig] Open position in Cologne

Dear all, at the Department for Digital Humanities in Cologne a four year position as a senior lecturer and research associate is open, which i hope can be interesting for people on this list or their colleagues. For more details see: https://tinyurl.com/IDHstelle All the best, Øyvind _

Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo R26

YES Øyvind > Am 20.03.2022 um 21:32 schrieb Pat Riva via Crm-sig : > > Hello all, > > Continuing with issues partially discussed but not actually voted at SIG#52 > in February. > > In the document for Issue 360: HW: F28 Expression Creation >

Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote: LRMoo class F27 and property R16

YES to all. Øyvind > Am 09.03.2022 um 00:18 schrieb Pat Riva via Crm-sig : > > Hello all, > > Following the discussion of F27 > > during SIG 52 in February, further work on revised scope notes for F27 and

Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote issue 517

YES Øyvind > Am 03.03.2022 um 20:50 schrieb Christian-Emil Smith Ore via Crm-sig > : > > Corrected, my typo. > Best, > Christian-Emil > > > From: Crm-sig on behalf of Martin Doerr via > Crm-sig > Sent: 03 March 2022 20:38 > To: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr > Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] Call for e-vote

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: New Member.

Yes. Øyvind > Am 27.11.2021 um 21:21 schrieb Martin Doerr via Crm-sig > : > > Dear All, > > It is a great pleasure and honor for us to announce that the Palace Museum in > Beijing applies for CRM-SIG membership. > > I have received the following request from the Museum: > > "The Palace Muse

Re: [Crm-sig] Modelling a simulated view on a physical space

question, view directions and sections of physical features > defined by view focus. > > Best, > > Martin > > On 10/26/2021 10:58 PM, Øyvind Eide via Crm-sig wrote: >> Dear Florian, >> >> thank you for this interesting puzzle! >> >> Befor

Re: [Crm-sig] Modelling a simulated view on a physical space

Dear Florian, in addition to the comments made by others, which makes a lot of sense too, I would offer the additional perspective that the resulting 3D model (with the added canvas) can be seen as a collage of the source 3D model and a digital reproduction of the photography / painting — thus

Re: [Crm-sig] Modelling a simulated view on a physical space

Dear Florian, thank you for this interesting puzzle! Before I venture into concrete suggestions, allow me to ask some question in the form of assumptions you can confirm, reject, or discuss: The establishment of a hypothetical viewpoint is used to establish a location of the canvas. That means

Re: [Crm-sig] Linked Places mapping

For work on gazetteers I would suggest to bring in Humphrey Southall. https://www.port.ac.uk/about-us/structure-and-governance/our-people/our-staff/humphrey-southall He has been working on them for decades and argued they organise information in a way which is useful also in a digital world. Al

Re: [Crm-sig] Argument for an Instrument Class (and its property)

Really interesting distinction. When doing pre-digital surveys for maps we used the compass for direction (clearly an instrument, and active?) and bodily calibrated steps to count the meters of distances (clearly part of the human body). Still the results of these measurements were more or less

Re: [Crm-sig] evote: Issue 535 example of Pxxx represents instance of type

YES Øyvind > Am 02.07.2021 um 13:29 schrieb E. Tsoulouha via Crm-sig > : > > Dear all, > > According to the decision for issue 535 in the 50th CIDOC CRM SIG meeting, > the first example of Pxx represents instance of type should be reformulated > in order to capture the fact that the thing re

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 493 (example templates)

YES > Am 18.06.2021 um 11:47 schrieb Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig > : > > Dear all, > > This issue is about agreeing a rationale and a template based on which > CRMbase and CRM extension examples will be produced. The working document for > this issue is here: > > https://docs.google.com/do

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for issue 384 (template for family models)

YES > Am 18.06.2021 um 11:56 schrieb Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig > : > > Dear all, > > This issue is about agreeing a template based on which the specification > documents of CRM family models will be produced. The working document for > this issue is here: > > https://docs.google.com/docu

Re: [Crm-sig] 511 e-vote

YES All the best, Øyvind > Am 19.03.2021 um 11:37 schrieb Athanasios Velios via Crm-sig > : > > Dear all, > > At the last session of the last CRM SIG meeting we discussed issue 511 and > voted to accept the reduction of the range of property P39 measured from E1 > CRM Entity to E18 Physical

Re: [Crm-sig] New project, question for input

Dear Daria Hookk, This looks good! It is in cooperation with the EADH conference in Krasnoyarsk the same week, right? All the best, Øyvind > Am 15.03.2021 um 10:36 schrieb Дарья Юрьевна Гук : > > Dear friends, > we already announced the event but maybe not everybody heard, I am so sorry > h

Re: [Crm-sig] New project, question for input

> Am 15.03.2021 um 10:15 schrieb Дарья Юрьевна Гук : > > There are academic institutions in Siant Peterburg (Russia) in contact with > Mongolian collegues realizing grants projects in arcives. > Hope they will be glad to participate. What do you mean ander 3-4 countries > if Russian Federatio

[Crm-sig] New project, question for input

t with knowledge of or experience from working with cultural heritage documentation in Mongolia would be willing to have a chat about it. Any other suggestions and comments on the project is of course also welcome. All the best, Øyvind -- Prof. Dr. Øyvind Eide Institut für Digital Huma

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 388 measuring position

If you determine the > relative position by (Dx,Dy), you create a rectangular triangle, with your > distance walked being the hypotenuse. > > If you have a nice proposal text to add, welcome! So far, I think I have > covered analogue practices. > > All the best, > > Mar

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 388 measuring position

Dear Martin, I am considering a possible practical counter-example from my own manual measurement experience. I am not sure if it is relevant but maybe the first sentence (”Any position measurement is based on triangulation with multiples distances to reference points and angle measurements”) s

Re: [Crm-sig] CALL FOR VOTE: NEW MEMBER

Yes! Øyvind > Am 26.01.2021 um 19:13 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear All, > > It is a pleasure for me to announce that Delving B.V., with representative > Sjoerd Siebinga, applies for joining CRM-SIG. Delving as a company has been > involved intermittently in the CIDOC-CRM community for the

Re: [Crm-sig] E-Vote: Change of Scope Note E10 Transfer of Custody (Issue 475)

I vote YES with the caveat that the examples should be looked at again and made easier to understand by rephrasing and adding some context to the cases. I can give more details to my issues with them if wanted. All the best, Øyvind > Am 06.10.2020 um 07:45 schrieb George Bruseker : > > Dear

Re: [Crm-sig] E-Vote ( Issue 508 ): First Order Logic Representation of p170

YES Øyvind > Am 06.10.2020 um 14:04 schrieb George Bruseker : > > Dear all, > > In the last SIG, the issue of the accuracy of the FOL representation of P170 > defines time (time is defined by) was raised in issue 508 > . A better FOL > repr

Re: [Crm-sig] [CRMarchaeo] E-vote for the label of A1 Excavation Process Unit

YES > Am 26.04.2020 um 19:52 schrieb Bekiari Chryssoula : > > Dear All, > > Following the decisions of the last crm-sig (46th CIDOC CRM), we invite you > to vote if you accept the proposed label change of A1 Excavation Process Unit > to A1 Excavation Processing Unit. > > PLEASE VOTE : > >

Re: [Crm-sig] E-vote for the scope note of P2 has type (is type of)

I vote YES. Øyvind > Am 31.01.2020 um 13:46 schrieb Bekiari Xrysoula : > > Dear All, > > Following the decisions of the last sig, we invite you to vote if you accept > the updated scope note of P2 has type . The old and the new scope notes > follow: > > =

Re: [Crm-sig] HW ISSUE 438, No E18 IsA E92

Thank you, Martin! It makes sense to me. One small detail I did not notice before (it was there all the time) in one of the E92 examples: "the spatio-temporal trajectory of the H.M.S. Victory from its building to its actual location” the last part of the sentence indicates that ”its actual lo

Re: [Crm-sig] Membership PLEASE VOTE

YES. Øyvind > Am 30.01.2020 um 18:27 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear All, > We are glad to announce that Swiss Art Research Infrastructure (SARI) would > like to become member of CRM-SIG: > > "The Swiss Art Research Infrastructure (SARI), hosted by the University of > Zurich and part of a > n

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: Scope note of E37 Mark

Dear all, Given this answer to E is part of documentation practice, could it be solved by double instantiation? All the best, Øyvind > Am 17.01.2020 um 22:18 schrieb Ethan Gruber : > > I agree with your assertion of D: that not all inscriptions are marks. > > I disagree with E. A mark can mo

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE P114-P120 VOTE

Dear Martin and Christian-Emil, thanks for the explanations and reminders of past discussions. On this basis I vote: YES. All the best, Øyvind > Am 12.01.2020 um 20:33 schrieb Christian-Emil Smith Ore > : > > ​Dear all, > It may seem very dramatic to move the P114-P120 to CRMarcheo. It is n

Re: [Crm-sig] Siegfried Krause

Dear all, very sad. Condolences to his family. I would also hope some official condolences would be possible. All the best, Øyvind > Am 09.11.2019 um 22:11 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear Colleagues, > > It is with deep sorrow that I have to inform you about the sudden loss of Dr. > Siegfr

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE proposal to replace E18 isa E92 and E4 isa E92 with properties

I will not be there either, and even if I love STVs to the extent that my home wifi is called SpaceTimeVolume, I full support this change and also support case 3. To me some of the quantifications looks in conflict with the text but this might be just my evening brain and even if I happen to b

Re: [Crm-sig] New ISSUE: Scope note and examples of E41 Appellation

s use as > an appellation for a particular thing". > > What do you think? > > Best, > > Martin > > On 10/13/2019 2:30 PM, Øyvind Eide wrote: >> Dear Martin, >> >> Just one small detail: >> >>> This class comprises signs, eith

Re: [Crm-sig] New ISSUE: Scope note and examples of E41 Appellation

Dear Martin, Just one small detail: > This class comprises signs, either meaningful or not, or arrangements of > signs following a specific syntax, […] Denotation is commonly connected to the concept of meaning. Thus, even if a place name is a series of sounds with no meaning as a word apart

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE: Issue Man-Made

Yes. Øyvind > Am 24.04.2019 um 22:11 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear All > > The proposal is to replace in all CRM labels "Man-Made" by "Human-Made" > > Please vote "YES" if you agree, "NO" if not, > > by: Mai 10, 2019 > > Kind regards, > > Martin > -- > ---

[Crm-sig] Changes in natural language

Dear all, The discussion of man or human is connected to a larger discussion about changes in natural language. CRM is meant to have a long life span. Thus, it will see a number of changes in the technologies and artificial languages in which it is expressed, as we discuss regularly, and which

Re: [Crm-sig] New Issue: Re-label E22, E25, E71 to remove "Man-"

Dear all, I support the change and would also like to point out that this is a local problem with the English language. For instance, in most other Germanic languages the distinction is clear, such as in German: Mann / Mensch or in Scandinavian where we have various versions of mann / menneske.

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE E34 PLEASE VOTE

Yes. Øyvind > Am 10.04.2019 um 21:12 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear All, > > The current scope not of E34 include a reference to the deprecated E84: > > OLD > E34 Inscription > > Subclass of: E33 Linguistic Object > > E37 Mark > > > Scope note: This class comprises reco

Re: [Crm-sig] New issue: Missing inverse of P189 PLEASE VOTE

Yes; good you spotted it! Regards, Øyvind > Am 05.04.2019 um 22:32 schrieb Robert Sanderson : > > In case it wasn’t obvious, a definite YES from me ☺ > > Rob > > From: Crm-sig on behalf of Martin Doerr > > Date: Friday, April 5, 2019 at 9:06 AM > To: "crm-sig@ics.forth.gr" > Subject: Re

Re: [Crm-sig] New Member PLEASE VOTE

I vote YES. Regards, Øyvind > Am 25.11.2018 um 15:21 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear All, > > The engineering company Decalog would like to become an official member of > the CRM-SIG. > > They provide software services to manage and expose their collections to > French museum, libraries and

Re: [Crm-sig] HW Issue 277

Thanks for this! Some small comments and questions below. > Am 22.11.2018 um 21:19 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear All, > Here my modifications: > > About Types > > Virtually all structured descriptions of museum objects begin with a unique > object identifier and information about the "type

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: representing compound name strings

Dear Martin, this is how the TEI would do it: http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ND.html#NDPER So something like: His Majesty Dr. Snoopy Hickup Miller Jr But one would need guidelines, esp. for the type attribute. In TEI everything can be done, and in several ways... Regard

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE :deprecating P149

Yes. Øyvind > Am 15.11.2018 um 15:15 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear All, > > Since E75 Conceptual Object Appellation has been deprecated, we have to > deprecate P149 as well: > > P149 is identified by (identifies) > > Domain: E28 Conceptual > Object > > Range:

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 345, P59 needs change

This looks good to me. Øyvind > Am 15.11.2018 um 15:43 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear All, > > Since E46 Section Definition has been deprecated, we need to change the scope > note of P59: > > P59 has section (is located on or within) > > Domain: E18 Physical Thing > > Range:

Re: [Crm-sig] PLEASE VOTE (deprecating P58, issue 345)

Yes. Øyvind > Am 15.11.2018 um 15:24 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear All, > > Since E46 Section Definition has been deprecated, we have to deprecate P58 as > well: > > P58 has section definition (defines section) > Domain: E18 Physical Thing > Range:E46 Section

Re: [Crm-sig] Parent of F4 Manifestation Singleton

Well, performances are usually not part of library or museum collections. The theatre museums I have worked with collect artefacts, texts, stage models etc. etc. but not performances. They do collect traces of performances though: reviews, programmes, posters, stage drawings, costumes, video rec

Re: [Crm-sig] New Membership PLEASE VOTE

ty, Tehran, Iran asks us for joining CIDOC CRM SIG as an > institutional member, with personal representative Miss. Massoomeh Niknia, > PhD Student in his department. > > She was a visiting scholar at the Koeln University; where she did part of her > PhD thesis under the guidance o

[Crm-sig] Workshop in Teheran

Dear colleagues, Though Massoomeh Niknia’s contacts in Iran we have to possibility to organise a CRM workshop and other digital cultural heritage meetings in Teheran, probably early/mid next years. Could those of you who are in principle interested in taking part write to me directly? Then we

[Crm-sig] Issue 334 Homework

> It is assigned to the Oyvind to investigate if it could expressed the > following phrase without the use of the term “unambiguously” in the scope > note of I9 Citation : “in which the interpretation of the source is > formulated as a set of formal propositions or regarded to be unambiguously

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: E74 Group (from LRMoo discussions)

But nations are much more than democratic nation-states. What about small nations steered by consensus, clan based nations, national with a significant number of political decisions based on referendum? What about nations/countries where voting is obligatory and it is a criminal offence not to v

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: E13 Attribute Assignment

> Am 23.03.2018 um 20:26 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear Florian, > > This is what I meant by "in general". > > I propose to reformulate: > > Therefore the use of E13 Attribute Assignment marks the fact, that the > maintaining team is either neutral to the validity of the respective > asser

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: CRMsoc and scope of CRM modules

Dear Martin, and all, > Am 10.01.2018 um 21:21 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear All, > > I propose to withdraw the decision to put the plans model into CRM "base". > The Model becomes very unwieldy now. > > I propose to create a CRMsoc (social), with > all plans, rights, norms, laws, business tr

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 295 homework

Dear Martin, and all, it looks good to me. Given the deprecation of E84 it could be nice to add a sentence to the scope note of E24, something like: ”Instances of this class can act as carriers of instances of E73 Information Object.” Regards, Øyvind > Am 04.01.2018 um 18:39 schrieb Martin D

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: label of inverse property notation PLEASE VOTE

A > Am 04.01.2018 um 16:31 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > Dear All, > Should we change in the CRM definition text together with the "i" for inverse > also the order of the two labels?: > e.g.: > > A) P73 has translation (is translation of) => P73i is translation of​ (has > translation) > OR > B) P

Re: [Crm-sig] Issuse 260 -- homeworks

ards, Øyvind > > Richard > On 18/12/2017 10:05, Øyvind Eide wrote: >> >>> Am 15.12.2017 um 10:53 schrieb Martin Doerr >> <mailto:mar...@ics.forth.gr>>: >>> >>> On 3/26/2017 9:29 PM, Øyvind Eide wrote: >>>> Dear Martin, >>

Re: [Crm-sig] Issuse 260 -- homeworks

> Am 15.12.2017 um 10:53 schrieb Martin Doerr : > > On 3/26/2017 9:29 PM, Øyvind Eide wrote: >> Dear Martin, >> >> this is dangerous territory. Do we need to go there? We may have to open up >> all sorts of boxes including those owned by language philosophers

[Crm-sig] Fwd: [GeoHumanities SIG] ADHO Linked Open Data SIG Reactivation

Dear colleagues, this should be of some interest to our community too. They ask, among other things, for standardisation… Regards, Øyvind > Anfang der weitergeleiteten Nachricht: > > On 11/1/17, 8:34 PM, "lod-boun...@lists.digitalhumanities.org on behalf of > Robert Warren" rwarr...@uoguelp

[Crm-sig] SIG meeting in Cologne

Dear all, the next SIG meeting will take place in Cologne from January 15-18 (Monday to Thursday). The exact location is at the Humanwissenschaftliche campus of the University of Cologne: https://lageplan.uni-koeln.de/#!221 Due to other (less important) ev

Re: [Crm-sig] Seminar: digital museum documentation

gis/team/> > >> Am 09.07.2017 um 10:12 schrieb Øyvind Eide > <mailto:lis...@oeide.no>>: >> >> Dear all, but especially those of you who can read German, >> >> a colleague sent me information about a seminar about digital museum >> document

[Crm-sig] Seminar: digital museum documentation

Dear all, but especially those of you who can read German, a colleague sent me information about a seminar about digital museum documentation run by Marco Klindt. Does anyone know about this person? https://www.xing.com/events/digitale-museumsdokumentation-1792509?sc_o=events_events_near_you I

Re: [Crm-sig] Request for use cases: Iconography in art history

ola > > > Nicola Carboni > CNRS - UMR 3495 MAP > nicola.carb...@map.cnrs.fr <mailto:nicola.carb...@map.cnrs.fr> > +33 (0)667243519 > > > > >> On 09 May 2017, at 18:20, Øyvind Eide > <mailto:lis...@oeide.no>> wrote: >> >> Dear al

[Crm-sig] Request for use cases: Iconography in art history

Dear all, I have received a request for information about projects using CIDOC-CRM to express assertions about iconography connected to paintings and other art objects. Thus, it is about what is depicted, as well as the carriers of the depictions, in the context of art history iconography. Al

Re: [Crm-sig] Issuse 260 -- homeworks

quite tricky for the > non-smoking symbol. > > Question: Should we touch also this front, or are we sure that "more light" > is always "more light" ? > > In other words, may be a title actually deviates from an appellation in that > it adds to its iden

[Crm-sig] HF issue 307

(This was sent in February but did not make it to some or all of you — apologies if it is a repetition) The 37th joined meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 and the 30th FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig reviewed and accepted the proposed scope note of E16 Measureme

Re: [Crm-sig] An interesting case of rights to think about..

Dear Athina, I have not moved beyond the article (thanks for posting it, it is a very useful addition to other complex land right issues!) but by reading that it seems like the river has the right of a legal person, not an individual. Is that right? If so, the river can be seen as an organisati

[Crm-sig] Issuse 260 -- homeworks

Dear all, Here is my homework for Issue 260: 1. E35: Accepted the comment made by Oyvind that the scope note of E35 Title is misleading, since it refers to something functioning a title, not having the form of a title, it is decided to keep the Title, to update scope note. This HW is assigned

[Crm-sig] HW reminder issue 307

The 37th joined meeting of the CIDOC CRM SIG and ISO/TC46/SC4/WG9 and the 30th FRBR - CIDOC CRM Harmonization meeting, the sig reviewed and accepted the proposed scope note of E16 Measurement and asked Oyvind to provide examples for image and symbolic object e.g. word count of the crm based o

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 307

r me measurement > means being in immediate contact with the measured. > > Would that make sense? > > Cheers, > > Martin > > On 7/12/2016 11:36 πμ, Øyvind Eide wrote: >> Dear Martin, >> >> I think the following claim is too strong: “a systematic, objectiv

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue 307

Dear Martin, I think the following claim is too strong: “a systematic, objective procedure of immediate observation” I think both objective and immediate have to be qualified in order to be used in this context. As the last paragraph describes the process in some detail, the reference to object

[Crm-sig] Homework: E89 Propositional Object (issue 312)

Dear all, Sorry about the lateness of this homework. The task was “to add examples to E89 Propositional Object about fictitious persons and places.” I am not 100% sure about how to phrase such examples but I include two below as starting points for discussion. Current examples: • Maxwe

[Crm-sig] Fwd: Small decision requested

Dear all, I assume some of you already know of this. It could make sense that someone from CIDOC were present, and most of the relevant people read this list, I believe.Kind regards,Øyvind Weitergeleitete Nachricht Betreff:

[Crm-sig] Cost action on archaeological practice

Dear all, I see there is a new cost action on “Archaeological practices and knowledge work in the digital environment.” http://www.cost.eu/COST_Actions/ca/CA15201 Does anybody know how (if?) they relate to cultural heritage information as we know it? I looked at the memorandum of understanding

Re: [Crm-sig] Recording Intangible Cultural Heritage

Dear Martin and Mika, This is also in line with how we can talk about models in the mind as opposed to expressed (mediated) models. In digital humanities we tends to focus on models as things. Another approach is cognitive studies of models in the mind, which is, as said, much less tangible and

Re: [Crm-sig] A CFP that sounds like a natural for #cidocCRM SIG folk

Dear Jim, thanks for the suggestion, but luckily I found a safe haven from publish or perish here in Germany ;-) More seriously, I agree that it would be good to make sure CRM is visible in such a book but I am afraid I am totally tied up when it comes to writing and research right not (not to

Re: [Crm-sig] VOTE for the name of E78 Collection

Yes. Ø. 10. feb. 2016 kl. 17:27 skrev Pat Riva : > Me too! > > Pat Riva > Associate University Librarian, Collection Services > Concordia University > Vanier Library (VL-301-61) > 7141 Sherbrooke Street West > Montreal, QC H4B 1R6 > Canada > +1-514-848-2424 ext. 5255 > pat.r...@concordia.ca > _

Re: [Crm-sig] E55 Type relations, ISSUE

is at least no temporal gap > inbetween. And timespan means more or less the same as spacetime volume here > since the area in the example is always the same. > > By the way, we have a similar problem in our gazetteer, where we need to > express the fact that a given region is pa

Re: [Crm-sig] E55 Type relations, ISSUE

Dear all, This was an interesting read. I have a question: I do not understand the logic of the last paragraph in page 2. First they talk about [1] “a specific time period in which and only in which objects of a given type have been created” and then they go on to talk about [2] no finds

Re: [Crm-sig] Next Meeting

Dear all, I had to make some other arrangements — some times life has to be planned well in advance. So I am now only available from Wednesday to Friday. Unless this poses problems for the local organisers or others have problems with it I would therefore selfishly propose we decide now that th

Re: [Crm-sig] Next Meeting

Dear Martin, Thank you for this! Given that we discussed a three day meeting it would be good to know as soon as possible if the meeting will be Mo-We or We-Fr in the week. Kind regards, Øyvind 26. okt. 2015 kl. 14:59 skrev martin : > Dear All, > > We have collected so far 17 responses to t

[Crm-sig] CRM and accounting

Dear all, Does anyone know about attempts to use CRM or FRBRoo for modelling historical ledgers or other types of accounting information? I know that accounting as part of the activity of museums falls outside the scope of CRM, but historical accounts may be a different question. All the best

Re: [Crm-sig] Participation to forthcoming meeting

Dear Chryssoula, I will arrive in Heraklion Wednesday afternoon so I will take part Thursday and Friday. All the best, Øyvind 28. sep. 2015 kl. 19:56 skrev Chryssoula Bekiari : > Dear All > > I would like to ask you about your participation to the forthcoming meeting > in Crete. > The provi

Re: [Crm-sig] Homework CRM issue 234/272 (in part)

8..." > where the case is "pluralized" and just needs the 's' deleted. > > Congratulations on getting your "homework" in on time! :-) > > -: Jim :- > > Sent using CloudMagic > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Øyvind Eide wrote: >

[Crm-sig] HW Issue 230

Dear all, Please find proposals for new scope notes for a coref class, and in addition a non-coref class. The new scope note is an attempt to remove some of the complexity of the previous definition. The attached doc file shows the changes from the proposal presented in Oxford by traced changes

[Crm-sig] Homework CRM issue 234/272 (in part)

Dear all, Please find drafts for new scope notes below. Best, Øyvind E4 Period Subclass of:E2 Temporal Entity E92 Spacetime Volume Superclass of:E5 Event Scope note: This class comprises sets of coherent phenomen

[Crm-sig] Homework CRM issue 234/272 (in part)

Dear all, Please find drafts for new scope notes below and also included as doc files. Issue272NewE4.docx Description: MS-Word 2007 document Issue272NewE18.docx Description: MS-Word 2007 document Best, Øyvind E4 Period Subclass of:E2 Temporal Entity

[Crm-sig] HW: issue 248

Here is my homework for issue 248. What should be done was: “a) ::Put a comment into the introduction of CRM that same label is used if the substance of the property is regarded to be the same, but different constraints apply to their use with a specific class, such as Parts of a period must be

Re: [Crm-sig] Participation to forthcoming meeting

I will be there from Wednesday morning to Friday afternoon. I have to teach in Passau on Tuesday and get to Norway on Friday night. Best, Øyvind On 8. mai 2015, at 12:48, Chryssoula Bekiari wrote: > Dear All > I would like to ask you about your participation to the forthcoming meeting > in Nu

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 272

Dear Martin, Thank you for this extension of the scope notes. I think it makes a lot of sense but I have similar comments as to E4. If the SIG thinks my suggestions for the changes to your proposal for E4 is useful I will be happy to make similar changes to the fourth paragraph (“Even though

Re: [Crm-sig] CRM/FRBRoo turorial/workshop at CIDOC 2015 New Delhi

I would love to come but I cannot pay myself and I have no clue how to find somebody else to pay. Funding channels here are already led to other waters. Regards, Øyvind On 5. mai 2015, at 15:53, Mika Nyman wrote: > > Dear Christian-Emil > > Just an offer for you to consider. > > I could say

Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE 272

Dear Martin, Thank you for the new version! As far as I can see some changes I suggested (and I thought was accepted?) for the last meeting is not part of your revised version. They are noted below. I also suggested an updated version of the new paragraph and wonders a bit if two paragraphs ar

Re: [Crm-sig] Issue P10

This makes sense to me. I find no counter-examples on the top of my head (or IN the top of my head forming part of the space time volume of my head forming part of…) Ø. 17. mars 2015 kl. 17:11 skrev martin : > Dear All, > I was pointed to the fact that E92 Spacetime Volume lacks a containment

Re: [Crm-sig] DigiPal: The Problem of Digital Dating: Online Survey

12. mars 2015 kl. 10:31 skrev arianna.ci...@roehampton.ac.uk: > Agreed. > > There are however at least two references in the TEI to issues concerning the > translation of verbal (and imprecise) temporal descriptions in the source > text to interpretations of numerical values. See > http://www.

[Crm-sig] Fwd: DigiPal: The Problem of Digital Dating: Online Survey

Dear all, This survey and the rationale behind it may be of interest to members of the CRM SIG too. Best, Øyvind Begin forwarded message: > From: James Cummings > Subject: DigiPal: The Problem of Digital Dating: Online Survey > Date: 11. mars 2015 13:21:09 GMT+01:00 > To: > Reply-To: > >

Re: [Crm-sig] Homework: issue 230

. 2015 kl. 20:55 skrev Øyvind Eide : > > 6. feb. 2015 kl. 19:07 skrev Richard Light : > >> >> On 06/02/2015 18:11, Øyvind Eide wrote: >>> If one source refers to one object, then it is not a co-reference. Then it >>> is a reference. >>> >>&

Re: [Crm-sig] Homework: issue 230

6. feb. 2015 kl. 19:07 skrev Richard Light : > > On 06/02/2015 18:11, Øyvind Eide wrote: >> If one source refers to one object, then it is not a co-reference. Then it >> is a reference. >> >> Co-reference is there to say that you know (for some reason you may sp

  1   2   >