OK I'll offer my $0.02
I stopped following the site because CSS in a vacuum is not interesting, to
me.
Real world work involves a three part combination of HTML CSS and
Javascript.
Discussing one without the others is like trying to get healthy by exercise
alone, without paying attention to
, heading for a high
speed crash? Or do I misunderstand how this works?
If so--if a technology change is indeed looming--will CSS be part of the
ultimate solution?
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [css-d
://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List
policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss
-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0
area.
In other words I'd like the thumbnails to float into an orderly table like
arrangement, controlled entirely by the browser, depending on current
viewport width.
is this possible with CSS only?
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0
-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
-- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
/
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org
it is not.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
tom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh
sandy.pittendr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a beginner at responsive design. I understand the mobile first
argument which (at least from the client side) boils down to Design for
the phone first and then use CSS
/help_support_evolt/
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css
to argue against that big picture view? Or amend it
some, for the benefit of a beginner?
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
--
/* Colin
the
desktop down, or from the cell phone up?
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com
clueless about cell phone CSS strategies. I learn quickly.
*What are some good online responsive design resources? * (my first
attempts to find good resources yielded poorly-written jargon)
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0
/help_support_evolt/
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css
I've been a fan of Romanato site for a long time.
Imagination ideas and ambition trump staid perfection any day.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0
Have code will travel */
__
css-discuss [css-d
tree (which used to be a
browser-sniffing nightmare, the last time I tried it). Are there any
alternate strategies I'm not aware of.simply because I'm an amateur
hacker and not a well-educated professional?
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0
Have code will travel
rather than a holding hand.
Continued support for IE6 is counterproductive--a bad strategy for the
community at large.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0
Have code will travel */
__
css-discuss [css-d
(and then have the sub-menus pop up left or right rather than below). And
then you can add new top-level menu items--more or less forever-without
running out of screen real estate.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0
Have code will travel
?
Corollary: is it true that fixed-width layouts (perhaps a centered 780 pixel
wide wrapper division) are the least portable across
various devices?
...thank you
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0
Have code will travel
{
width: 333px;
height: 250px;
margin: 0 auto;
padding: 0;
overflow: hidden;
}
#showdiv img { max-width: 333px; max-height: 250px;}
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0
montana-riverboats.com
, mean Google Sketchup would
no longer be a windows binary download. You could run it any HTML5 browser.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
, is that an error of any kind? And if so,
it it an HTML error or a CSS error. I tried to look this up W3.org, but I'm
going to have to work on those grammar-like specifications. They are not
easy for beginners to read.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0
-resolutions times N-browsers.
What is the professional debugging way proceed?
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
: #22 1px 1px 0
}
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http
text-shadow doesn't exist in CSS level 2.1 but exists in
: #ff 1px 1px 0 #ff 1px 1px 0 #ff 1px 1px 0 #ff 1px 1px 0
I'm not sure what the issues are here.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [cs
or Mac. Sorry for passing bad
information
on a holiday.
:-((
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
only).
Any examples out there anybody can point me to?
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
The holy grail is that place we'll all be to (soon, I think)
when we can finally stop worrying, thinking about and dealing
with IEsicks.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org
: 3px inset #cc; }
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies
/dirLCSS.css
type=text/css
/head
body
etc
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com
and
traditional
ways to make the same displays. If your pages are invisible to Google,
then they are essentially invisible to everyone.
--
/* Colin (Sandy) Pittendrigh --oO0 */
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
practice solutions. Position is Everything has a
full explanation.
http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/expandingboxbug.html
Best,
-colin
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css
I'm sure my problem is ridiculously simple but it's driving me mad.
Firefox tells me my link is
div#contenuliste-articleul .somm-titrelih3.titrea
What is the syntax for setting the color of the link.
i've tried
a.h3.somm-titre{
color: #eef;
}
a.somm-titre{
color: #eef;
}
a.h3.titre{
of you try opening http://lim.nl/index.html to see what
happens? If the background is dark and the text and image are
centered, then the style file was loaded; otherwise I really do have a
problem.
Thanks.
--
Colin Brace
Amsterdam
http://lim.nl
On Jan 14, 2008 9:09 PM, L. David Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to configure the server to send CSS files as text/css.
Fixed, thanks.
I will henceforth pay more attention to the error console.
--
Colin Brace
Amsterdam
http://lim.nl
Susanne Jäger wrote:
Colin Mcgarry wrote, On 10.11.2007 17:28:
The reason for browser searching is to accommodate browser quirks in the
CSS.
Well user agent sniffing is IMHO (one of) the most fragile method(s) of
doing that. You will never target all good browsers properly
David Hucklesby wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 15:14:52 +0100, Colin Mcgarry wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
The page now validates. Most of the problems came from imported scripts.
Firefox and IE7 see indexcss.php as a css file. Opera sees it as a blank
page.
Colin, What version
is to accommodate browser quirks in the
CSS.
Colin Mcgarry wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
The page now validates. Most of the problems came from imported scripts.
Firefox and IE7 see indexcss.php as a css file. Opera sees it as a
blank page.
David Hucklesby wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:11
Thanks for the replies.
The page now validates. Most of the problems came from imported scripts.
Firefox and IE7 see indexcss.php as a css file. Opera sees it as a
blank page.
David Hucklesby wrote:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:11:36 +0100, Colin Mcgarry wrote:
I've just set up Opera to see
I've just set up Opera to see how it deals with my web pages. I was
surprised to see my home page has no css with Opera.
the page is http://www.cpmac.comand the css is a php file that begins
?php
header(Content-type: text/css);
$d = detect();
$b = $d['browser'];
$v = $d['version'];
$o =
Looking at the css of a website I was visiting i noticed the following
page layout.
#page {
position: absolute;
width: 994px;
left: 50%;
margin-left: -497px;
}
I can follow the logic of this but is it better than
left 0
margin 0
,
Colin
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http
Thanks Georg,
I thought I was nuts for a while. I was able to line things up in
photoshop, and everything looked normal.
I presume the png compression utility I used mucked things up, but it could
very well be me.
Very much appreciated...cheers!
Colin
Colin wrote:
In ff1.5/win for some reason
On 3/28/06, Ingo Chao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Colin Sheaff wrote:
I'm sure I could suss this out with enough hours of research and
trial-and-error tweaking of the site, but I would love to resolve this
quicker
so I ask for your help.
http://www.canastamusic.com/press
francky wrote:
Brian Funk wrote:
Keith Kaiser wrote:
OK! It's done.
help me out by taking a look and giving me some feedback.
http://kaiserklan.com/roundtable
on WinXP IE6:
.
5.
In general, be carefull with colored words on colored backgrounds.
There has to
will highlight in reverse to the begining of the page. This
doesn't happen in Firefox 1.501, or Safari 1.3.2. This actually happens on all
the pages on the site. I have a feeling it's an issue with relative
positioning.
Thanks for the help,
Colin
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello
I'm trying to adapt a script I found for roll down menus in css.
My adaptation works except the rolldown menus displace the text of the
div just below.
In the original they cover the text. I can't see what I've changed to
make the comportment change.
The base script is at
Sarangan Thuraisingham wrote:
Colin McGarry wrote:
Hello
I'm trying to adapt a script I found for roll down menus in css.
My adaptation works except the rolldown menus displace the text of
the div just below.
In the original they cover the text. I can't see what I've changed to
make
Thomas Hall wrote:
Please look at this layout -
http://webhost.bridgew.edu/etribou/layouts/3col_footer/archives/3col_footer_
02
This is about what I am after except I'd like to be able to absolutely
position elements inside the header, footer, and columns. It seems that when
I attempt this
to 'heighten
them' on a:hover.
I believe I've read about this before, and I think someone's response to
'semi-clickable links in IE' will probable solve this for Donna, and help me
out along the way.
I think I'm due for a miracle, any 'css gods' out tonight?
Cheers,
Colin
I have a site that has a repeating background y only. And i want it
to adjust to the screen. got that to work but it seems like i need a
minimum requirements because when i resize the window so the content
is lager than 100% of the screen it cuts off the background that
being repeated.
I am trying to make a footer that is automatically adjusting, i think
because i created a background image to repeat inside a div tag that
has height of 100% then, the website isn't allowing the footer image
to show because on some browsers it is cutting it off. Is that the
right
.
Thanks again,
Colin
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
page will be. (and this
image is supposed to stick to the bottom)
If anyone has any ideas, it looks like I'll be up for quite some time
tonight.
BTW, it does validate.
http://dreampowercostumes.com/travel
Thanks
Colin
__
css
height.
I presume the problem cascades from somewhere above #main, but I just can't
see it.
Thanks so much for your help.
BTW, this can be seen at:
http://dreampowercostumes.com/travel/usingClearingDiv.asp
Colin
__
css-discuss
Weird thing. On internet explorer and Foxfire this looks a ok but if
you load it on safari it doesn't seem to load the page correctly it
seems to merge the webpage you are on with the new page, and if you
hit refresh then it still gets all messed up. Could somebody please
shed a little
Hi this is just a general question i would like to be updated on.
I always thought you were supposed to put position in your Div Ids
and stuff? but on the pages no one seems to be putting them at all.
if it not there is there a default the tags becomes?
Also, I always thought there was a
I been seeing this tag but i don't understand what it means could
someone explain it in detail to me please thank you.
htmlbody #content {
width: 46%; /* ie5win fudge ends */
}
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If anyone has any ideas on how to go about fixing this, I'm all ears.
Note to self...quit listening to the monitor.
Thanks everyone for your help.
Cheers,
Colin
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org
is in trying to horizontally center the #main div using
margin: 0 auto; and for some reason it is getting offset to the left of
center.
I've drawn a red border around the problem spot.
If anyone has any ideas on how to go about fixing this, I'm all ears.
Thanks in advance,
Colin
Hi,
Can someone explain the huge amount of extra space that IE6 is putting in this
page...
http://colinmac.port5.com/bluegreybox1-1/bluegreybox/index.html
It looks fine in Firefox and Opera, and I don't want to break *them* to fix IE,
but I need it to work in IE.
TIA
Colin
67 matches
Mail list logo