at all.
Is there a way that you may know about, so that we can archive something like
this
video {
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
BUT avoiding the scroll bar to appear, without using overflow:hidden; ?
k. regards,
mem
On Oct 18, 2012, at 13:06 , mem wrote:
Hello all,
I'm trying to make a certain video responsive.
width: 100% or max-width:100% and height: auto; will do.
Now, the problem is, in order to maintain the aspect ratio, if the screen is
to wide, the height is so height that we will have
i don't really understand. Are you constraining the height somewhere else ?
I believe not. But perhaps that is what I should do ?
This works perfectly fine in my test:
div { border: 2px solid red; max-width: 85%; }
video { max-width: 100%; height: auto; width: 100%; }
The video
I had a problem with the video aspect ratio that make me doubt of css and html.
The problem however was within the aspect ratio and NOT html and css.
To cut the story short:
height: auto;
max-width: 100%;
do the job perfectly.
I will pushing myself severely.
Regards,
mem
) Float left your red div;
7) Give your #footer the following: clear: both; (or left);
From here, validate your markup and css, and if in doubt, post back.
k. regards,
mem
On Sep 27, 2012, at 16:24 , Del Wegener wrote:
Good Morning;
A colored illustration of my problem is at
http
On Sep 19, 2012, at 22:07 , Matthew Willis wrote:
Hi CSS List,
I am working on a site with a responsive layout via media queries and I'm
having some difficulties. I need it set up so when the width of the screen is
above 768px, a div containing logo appears as the first element, and then
to enlarge, until it reaches the end it's container.
Visually, I'm expecting the image to be as wide as the paragraph immediately
below, in a way that, the right side of the image stays vertically aligned with
the right side of the paragraph below.
k. regards,
mem
Maybe I'm missing something
On Aug 30, 2012, at 19:59 , Micky Hulse wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something?
No. But I was. :)
I was thinking that the max-width will format my img to be as wide as the
container but it doesn't.
I either should use width. Or upload a bigger image and use max-width to get
the desired effect.
-style: normal;
}
Perhaps if you have only one, you can narrow the problem. :)
k. regards,
mem
On Jul 9, 2012, at 16:29 , Chris Kavinsky wrote:
I'm having some issues getting @font-face to wok on a site and I'm sure I'm
missing something simple. Its a static html site (for now) and got
a
visual continuation flow by adding some background to the body.
Perhaps I'm not seeing it properly, but until know, I'm taking the body element
as the viewport area and the wrapper as the content container area;
Regards,
mem
__
css
On Jun 21, 2012, at 18:47 , mem wrote:
Perhaps I'm not seeing it properly, but until know, I'm taking the body
element as the viewport area and the wrapper as the content container
area;
[SIC] now instead of know.
(and possible other issues as well
On Jun 19, 2012, at 21:15 , Brett Goodrich wrote:
Check out http://ccbci.org/the-courses/
Perhaps you may wish to validate your markup and check again IE results.
Otherwise, you will end up having to much trouble debugging it.
Cheers
mem
article content is to narrow when compared with the same
article rendered on good browsers.
Haven't found any way to properly solve this.
Any clue ?
k. regards,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
bad link. My bad.
http://dev.teias.org.pt/about
k. regards,
mem
On Jun 13, 2012, at 13:05 , mem wrote:
Please take a look on the following page:
http://teias.dev/about
By looking into good browsers and IE you will find two issues:
1)
The point was to have the background narrow
an issue.
All clear.
ps- I will request the list help once I start dealing with my first (oh yeah)
mobile friendly (or at least, mobile colleague) version.
:)
Thanks a lot,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
Can you please provide us a link?
You have several other classes and elements that my apply, and it would be
important to see them all.
Cheers,
mem
No dia 12 de Jun de 2012 19:45, Mark Weiss dadwe...@mac.com escreveu:
I need to center this form inside multiple divs
I have tried setting
On Jun 7, 2012, at 8:46 , Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
Le 7 juin 2012 à 06:23, mem a écrit :
So, perhaps this is what I'm not getting:
if we float an element to the right, for example, but we give it a width of
100% what will that float: right visually accomplish ?
Nothing,… maybe
. regards,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported
Hello all,
Can you please take a look on the following snipped and either edited and/or
explain here, why, when we add a *percentage* value on margin, we get some li
to drop the float ?
http://jsfiddle.net/vNmjS/
k. regards,
mem
On Jun 6, 2012, at 18:02 , Georg wrote:
On 06.06.2012 18:16, mem wrote:
Can you please take a look on the following snipped and either edited and/or
explain here, why, when we add a *percentage* value on margin, we get some
li to drop the float ?
http://jsfiddle.net/vNmjS/
Question
On Jun 6, 2012, at 20:55 , Tom Livingston wrote:
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:51 PM, mem talofo.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 6, 2012, at 18:02 , Georg wrote:
On 06.06.2012 18:16, mem wrote:
Can you please take a look on the following snipped and either edited
and/or explain here, why, when we
to play with those concepts.
http://jsfiddle.net/Wz4Ck/9/
Regards,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies
, for doing this ?
I've tried:
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
Nothing happened.
k. regards,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
On May 22, 2012, at 13:26 , Georg wrote:
On 22.05.2012 06:34, mem wrote:
My question is: It seems to me that, using text-align:center; should
serve the propose of centering text and NOT img and other nested
divs, am I wrong ?
Yes, in that 'text-align: center' centers inline-level
?
Thanks a lot,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported
image with a transparency so
that the gradient may appear behind.
k. regards,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List
-image: url(image_url), linear-gradient(right, #f6f6f6, #fff);
Cheers,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies
,
#fff); /* IE10 */
background-image: url(image_url), -o-linear-gradient(right, #f6f6f6,
#fff); /* Opera 11.10+ */
background-image: url(image_url), linear-gradient(to right, #f6f6f6, #fff);
Cheers,
mem
Correction - this will work:
background-color: #f6f6f6;
background-position
that, according the your
goals, that's the way your site, technically speaking, should go.
Thank you, Erik Visser
Cheers,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki
text
should never pass that yellow-gold shape, and the same goes for footer.
Best,
David Laakso
Thanks a lot, again.
I will now deal with it and test a lot. :)
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
solution would be to draw this all
thing with CSS polygonon like the frog on css-tricks.
I'm totally new to this irregular challenges and my question is:
What techniques exist that allow us to accommodate the irregular nature of a
given layout with a fluid layout choice ?
k. regards,
mem
have that need
here.
Thanks a lot.
k. regards,
mem
On May 18, 2012, at 1:23 , David Laakso wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:09 PM, mem talofo.l...@gmail.com wrote:
What techniques exist that allow us to accommodate the irregular
nature of a given layout with a fluid layout choice ?
k
Thank you all.
It was a path issue, regarding the server side programming language in question.
K. Regards, and thanks again for your availability,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org
shouldn't use it) ?
:)
k. regards,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
-equiv=X-UA-Compatible content=IE=edge
mem wrote:
This a little of topic, but still css related. :)
I'm desperate. :)
Indeed.
Any known way to force the browser to not use compatibility mode at all ?
(without going to each bad browser users and yelling at them that, despite
On Jan 13, 2012, at 12:01 , Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Jan 13, 2012, at 7:52 PM, mem wrote:
Something like this seems to help, but I've seen a lot of comments telling
that, that isn't applied on all users.
meta http-equiv=X-UA-Compatible content=IE=edge
it is supposed to work
:
#some-selector {
width: 14em;
}
But when I look on IE8 he get's width:16em; no matter what.
I can absolutely guarantee that the selector is the same.
What am I doing wrong? Is the the expected behavior ?
k. regards,
mem
On Jan 8, 2012, at 21:00 , Kim Brooks Wei wrote:
HI People,
I'm having trouble figuring out how to align pictures and text here
http://is.gd/B7MBSg.
I got a 404 page, perhaps it's another page, since I see no petition graphic
there.
k. regards,
mem
related layout engine.
So best info I know about this is:
http://developer.apple.com/library/safari/#documentation/AppleApplications/Reference/SafariCSSRef/Articles/StandardCSSProperties.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/%28null%29-SW1
--
Regards,
Peng
Hope this helps,
mem
and place !important on those rules that you know your CMS shouldn't
override;
k. regards,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
in advance,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported
On Dec 26, 2011, at 13:58 , Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
2011-12-26 15:29, mem wrote:
If we validate this CSS as CSS 3 :
http://dev.zoom.org.pt/
You will see that the validator will trow two parse errors.
Both error messages are caused by the same syntax error, namely the use of 1
that I'm totally unaware.
For the time being, I am not even sure if those replies have already arrived to
the list.
Sorry for this off-topic consideration.
k. regards,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
Hello all,
This seems to be working, thanks to some valuable members input and
considerations:
http://help.nuvemk.com/testStructure2/
On IE7 however, our input fields seem to have an extra bottom space that I
can't identify if it's margin or padding, but the issue is there.
Can please
Thank you all, again. :)
Issue solved.
M.
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies --
combination that should never arrive.
Can I have your help in order to solve this for good ?
k. regards,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http
Hello all,
Can anyone point me out why, here, the header vanishes on IE 7 and IE 8 ?
http://help.nuvemk.com/testStructure/
thanks a lot,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman
On Nov 27, 2011, at 11:29 , Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
2011-11-27 11:44, mem wrote:
Can anyone point me out why, here, the header vanishes on IE 7 and IE 8 ?
http://help.nuvemk.com/testStructure/
A tricky bug, but the fix seems to be surprisingly simple: add the body
tag. Caveat: I have
Page with only one header set in it.
Please see http://chelseacreekstudio.com/me1.html
Page should hold and show now in IE/8 and IE/7.
Probably needs a little adjustment for IE/7 [guessed-- no IE/7 hereabout now].
Not sure that repeating the header the way you've done in your sample is
and width defined.
Can I have your help please?
cf:
.logo-organization-home
http://help.nuvemk.com/centerImages/centerplease.php
http://help.nuvemk.com/centerImages/style.css
Thanks,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
On Nov 16, 2011, at 22:47 , mem wrote:
Hello all, again.
This is hard. (At least it seems to be);
I should have a container of a min-width and min-height defined so that, if
the image inside that container is very tiny, the container should maintain
is position, by having the contained
-shadow: 1px 1px 3px #999;
}
The right shadow will however appear if I change the width to: 97% or less;
How can I fix this behavior in order to have the shadows properly showed with
the proper width ?
Tested on FF 7.0.1 Mac Os X;
Thanks a lot,
mem
/floatedFluidLayoutHtml5/style_solved.php
Regards,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org
.
I thought that it could be because I've floated without explicit declared a
width, but even with a width it keeps it's behavior.
What could this be ?
k. regards,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css
On Nov 16, 2011, at 24:49 , Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Nov 16, 2011, at 9:33 AM, mem wrote:
IE 7 and 8 do not understand the html5 'nav' element at all. You need some js
to 'explain' that element to those browsers. Search for 'HTML5 shim'
Thanks.
Done it. Forgot about that. Long
On Nov 16, 2011, at 1:04 , David Laakso wrote:
Greetings from Tijuana.
Please see http://chelseacreekstudio.com/me.html
In the head of the document...
!--[if lt IE 9]
script src=//html5shim.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/html5.js/script
![endif]--
thanks.
I notice you didn't choose float
page.
Clear your errors, and post back your questions, and someone may help you then.
:)
Regards,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css
On Nov 15, 2011, at 2:02 , David Laakso wrote:
http://help.nuvemk.com/css/layout_structure_home.pdf
Regards,
Jorge Amado
Interesting visual, Jorge. A little top-heavy for mobile - handsets [as
is]with all that navigation, though.
Fwiw, please see:
On Nov 15, 2011, at 2:02 , David Laakso wrote:
This end OS X 10.4 and Android/2.2.2 [ low end smart-phone]. View in IE/6.0
if you seek only a 960 fixed width site...
Media queries will be my friends if the client requests mobile support.
This site target is:
. IE7 and up;
. Good browsers;
On Nov 11, 2011, at 2:51 , David Laakso wrote:
I'd suggest that you simply put a full and complete rough layout /on your
server/ that reflects your intended final goal. Allow it to speak for itself.
No novella to accompany it is needed.
http://help.nuvemk.com/css/layout_structure_home.pdf
On Nov 10, 2011, at 5:42 , G.Sørtun wrote:
If you say so. I often let 'html' alone do the fill viewport job, leaving
'body' open for other jobs. How to use elements depends mainly on degree of
legacy browser support.
I didn't know that html would also be a container somehow. I always
look and feel ?
2) I'm trying to stress test a little and see the so called compounding effect
- but no luck so far. What am I missing? (yes I want to provoke it so that, if
it arrives during the development I can deal with it.)
Thanks again,
mem
of their parents
#news-block-a and #news-block-b
5)
should we use min-height instead of height on those three blocks:
#newsletter-block
#news-block-a
#news-block-b
Thanks a lot,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
you think ?
Note: This is just a question, if it does make sense to you, just tell me and
explain me why so that I could understand and I can leave with that.
K. Regards,
mem
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http
On Nov 9, 2011, at 16:59 , David Laakso wrote:
On 11/9/11 8:35 AM, mem wrote:
What do you think ?
It makes no difference whether the grid is set to px, em, or percent width.
The problem still remain the same-- if and when a user scales up the fonts
she will be confronted
On Nov 9, 2011, at 19:50 , G.Sørtun wrote:
On 09.11.2011 19:51, mem wrote:
Question A) What unit should we use ? I've seen on some sites the
option for max-width: 100% I've seen max-width defined with: em;
I've seen it with px;
To make a flexible layout play well across the increasing
On Nov 9, 2011, at 22:48 , G.Sørtun wrote:
On 09.11.2011 22:24, mem wrote:
it will assume the max-width value as width correct ?
Yes, but I advice against relying on default behavior across browser-land -
especially for legacy browsers - when adding 'width: 100%' (or something)
costs
Hello all,
I have just finished the wireframes phase for this project, and now the
designer is creating the final layouts for each of those pages.
I must develop the CSS for those 100 pages and I'm really afraid about
the fact that, I will have, almost surely, rules that will overwrite
each
On 30-08-2011 19:31, Ingo wrote:
mem schrieb am 30.08.2011 19:31
I must develop the CSS for those 100 pages and I'm really afraid about
the fact that, I will have, almost surely, rules that will overwrite
each other and it will be a mess, sooner or later.
Here is an interesting discussion
Context:
#menu li a {
background:url('image/menu.png') no-repeat;
width:100%;
height:100%;
display:block;
}
Add on:
#menu li {
height: 100px;
width: 200px;
}
As are inline-level elements so width and height do not apply unless you
style them as block-elements.
ok.
On Oct 23, 2010, at 8:07 PM, MEM wrote:
Height: 100% only works if the height of the parent element is known, as in
your code snippet:
Ok. It's 100% of a given height. 100% is a relative measure, hence, we
need to have a reference. Slowly... I'm getting somewhere. :s
Philippe
Thanks
2010/10/23 MEM tal...@gmail.com:
Hello (again),
I'm trying to accomplish the following:
http://www.occ.nuvemk.com/CssMarcio/secundariaOcc.html
With the above CSS:
http://www.occ.nuvemk.com/CssMarcio/occ.css
The floats seem to be understood on latest FF, Opera and Mac Safari -
But on IE8
Hello all,
On a sprite technique we often see something like this:
#menu li a {
background:url('image/menu.png') no-repeat;
width:100%;
height:100%;
display:block;
}
Why, when we set the display to block, the width and height properties
seem to realise the background image
+1 Tim:
Have a look here:
http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/112698
Regards,
Márcio
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
I'm absolutely no guru here (not anywhere), and I'm sure you will get
better replies.
Still:
2010/8/18 Keith Purtell keithpurt...@keithpurtell.com
{float: right; width: 15em; margin: 1 1em 1em; padding: 0.25em;}
First, I don't understand width. It's not the width of my image; what is
it
2010/7/16 Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com:
On Jul 16, 2010, at 12:10 AM, MEM wrote:
td img {vertical-align: bottom; } /* or top */
?
Thank you. That worked on the browser preview but not on hotmail and
gmail clients. :(
Have you checked what the computed value is for the offending
Hello all,
Is there a way to remove the white space inside a td that contains an
image, without using display:block; ?
The reason why I can't use display:block; relies on the fact (so I
believe) that some e-mail clients don't support it.
Is there another way for removing them?
Thanks a lot in
2010/7/15 Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com:
On Jul 15, 2010, at 10:37 PM, MEM wrote:
Is there a way to remove the white space inside a td that contains an
image, without using display:block; ?
td img {vertical-align: bottom; } /* or top */
?
Philippe
Thank you. That worked
Hello all,
I believe we can now see all the information regardless the viewport size.
I've added the position fixed property only for those that have a
width and height greater then a certain value.
I've used media queries and add a js to deal with IE versions.
Users that zoom in text, on the
2010/7/11 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk:
Oh, that is /desperately/ slow, Márcio : 23 seconds
to complete loading. I am afraid I wouldn't be
willing to wait that long in the real world. I really
think you need to reduce the complexity and increase
the efficiency.
2010/7/11 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk:
OK, again not an answer to your real problem, Márcio,
but as a visitor I would expect to be able to click
on the + sign, not on the text, in order to expand
the view.
Philip Taylor
Yes. It was on my list before, I end
2010/7/11 Debbie Campbell d...@redkitecreative.com:
I'm using the footerStickAlt sticky footer method on this site-in-progress:
http://www.redkitecreative.com/projects/optienz/jobs/
It seems to be working fine in FF, Safari, Chrome, IE8/7 but is breaking
in Opera 10.6
I'm on Vista and in
2010/7/11 MEM tal...@gmail.com:
The Safari issue, stills there. :(
Márcio
Well If I was Safari I would do the same. Strange however that others
don't follow.
My #wrapper-esquerda element was defined with a overflow:hidden;
property. (at the time I wanted to contain something perhaps
2010/7/11 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk:
MEM wrote:
Thanks for point out some issues here and there, they are more then
welcome. :) I have a life to learn about this. :D
OK, then another one :-)
When I click on the first +, it expands (reveals) that region;
when I
2010/7/11 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk:
OK, but will your visitors think it cool ? Or would they prefer
to have control over what is concealed and what is revealed.
They sure prefer to have control and I sure prefer to give them that
control, to show or hide, and to do,
The URI is the same, some js errors will be taken care later.
http://www.nuvemk.com/nascer/
Taking seriously (as ever) this list suggestions,
I will then start with the screen size issues.
Then, pass to IE7 issues.
If I properly understood Philippe Wittenbergh, by using @media screen,
we can
2010/7/6 Dipesh Parmar dipesh.par...@ntlworld.com:
I've been developing a site www.audiocatz.com and had a few layout problems
which have all been eradicated and validated except one. The only problem i
have left is the header text is too close to the menu in internet explorer
and i cant
Hello all,
First I must excuse myself for such a poor semantic structure on my markup.
I've not yet found a way to proper do that on this layout structure.
Html:
http://www.nuvemk.com/nascer/
Css:
http://www.nuvemk.com/nascer/Css/Main.css
The intended result is to allow the scroll to happen,
2010/7/4 MEM tal...@gmail.com:
Is there a way out of this?
background-attachment: fixed;
Seems to be the solution.
I'm now aware this layout is a mess on ie7.
True that ie6 is not a target browser, but ie7 is.
I will accept some advices about where should I start to solve this
ie7 issues. :D
2010/7/4 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com:
Your uri is: http://www.nuvemk.com/nascer/
All good things in due time. You have a way to go before concerning yourself
with IE/7.0. Resolve compliant browser issues first.
Ok.
Expand the menu thingy and view your page at:
640 x 480
2010/7/4 Claude Needham gxx...@gmail.com:
However, if possible, the page should render in a reasonable fashion
even for those without javascript.
Regards,
Claude Needham
Thanks Claude,
I'm trying to hide divs only by using javascript, and not CSS, so
that, if no javascript engine is
2010/7/4 David Laakso da...@chelseacreekstudio.com:
Keep in mind that they way it is set now, that users will not be able to
access all the items in the left column, and/or they will not see the
footer, with or without javascript enabled-- at 1024x768, 1152x870, and
1280x960.
Wow. Yes know I
2010/7/5 Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com:
Fwiw, I noticed that you are using JS to (eventually) load stylesheets
depending on the user screen resolution.
Don't. This is the wrong way to solve this.
For one thing, the is absolutely no guarantee that the screen width will be
the browser
Hello all,
I have a layout structure problem in hands that I would love to deal
with, by using CSS but I'm not sure, if it can be done using only css.
And if it can, what will be a nice way for doing so.
So, I would like to ask list advice on this.
I've seen last David Laakso sugestion on a
2010/6/30 Tim Climis tcli...@exchange.iu.edu:
That's the way i would do it. It won't work in IE6, since that browser
doesn't support position: fixed. so if you need it in that browser too, I
think you'll have to go with a script.
---Tim
In this case, IE6 is not a requirement.
Thanks for
Position: fixed [1] is what you want. Since you do not need to hit IE/6 the
file does not need to be in quirksmode, and no scripting [IE expressions]
needed. These are various examples by Anne van Kesteren [2]. This example by
George Sortun is a 3col layout based on Anne van Kesteren [3]. This
http://ecoitsf.com/test.html
I would like a background image to sit behind the nav at 100% of the page.
Hello,
Have you tried to put a div containing your navigation and, inside
that div, have a background-image property defined pointing to your
image?
What kind of image? Do you intend to
Pages on this WordPress site are not always loading correctly in IE8:
http://www.tomlinsondesigns.com/projects/
If you don't see it, you should when you move to different pages -
sometimes the white background is missing and other design elements in
the sidebar and footer are moved. Can
2010/5/29 Kim Brooks Wei kimi@kimbwei.com:
Hi People,
hi. Kimi
This site http://bit.ly/uVTaf works well in all the browsers I need
(Safari , Firefox and IE 7.0+) except IE 6.0. Are there fixes I can
install to make it work in 6.0 too?
On your homewrap div, have you tried to contain
2010/4/28 jeffrey morin rufus2...@gmail.com:
Am I missing something?
Jeff
Allow me Jeff, you are missing the main point here. A very big main point.
Designing for web is not, the same thing as designing for paper.
Even designing for paper is not a guarantee that all will be equal
seen by
1 - 100 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
