Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-18 Thread david
MEM wrote: Note the added directory. ../*rebelatehome*/images/hover.png Well Alan, this is really odd, since, even on other computers, I still see the background. However if I change the path to the above (../rebelatehome/images/hover.png), *no background image is showed*. My directory

Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-18 Thread Alan Gresley
Mark Henderson wrote: MEM wrote: My directory structure is: + rebelatehome + css - home8.css + images - hover.png + js So, if the css is inside css directory, to go to images directory from the css file, we have to, up one level: ../ enter one level /images/ and

Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-18 Thread MEM
MEM wrote: Note the added directory. ../*rebelatehome*/images/hover.png Well Alan, this is really odd, since, even on other computers, I still see the background. However if I change the path to the above (../rebelatehome/images/hover.png), *no background image is showed*. My

Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-18 Thread David Hucklesby
MEM wrote: Thank you Mark, David, Alan It's a tiny little thing, I do agree. So little actually, that I will tell the designer to give me a no transparent one, for ie6 proposes because I don't see a big deal not having that little tiny shadow there. Alan, well, at least now we know

Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-17 Thread Alan Gresley
MEM wrote: The point is to give layout to the links! By links I mean a elements inside #mainMenu. Clear as water (on other times). I've learned that anchor elements are inline elements, and that the haslayout fixes, around the web world, may be directed, or not, to those inline elements.

Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-17 Thread MEM
I do not know if this is the case. Saying that giving layout to IE7- on an anchor to *give it full height* is completely wrong. The true rendered height of an anchor is due to either, 1. A height (20px or 2em) directly given to the element. 2. A height (100%) given to an element which

Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-17 Thread Alan Gresley
MEM wrote: [...] Please correct the URL paths in your CSS to point to the correct directory and you will have the background image of your links working. The path is correct I believe, since the path on my css is relative to the images directory and not to the documents root directory.

Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-17 Thread MEM
Note the added directory. ../*rebelatehome*/images/hover.png Well Alan, this is really odd, since, even on other computers, I still see the background. However if I change the path to the above (../rebelatehome/images/hover.png), *no background image is showed*. My directory structure is: +

Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-17 Thread Mark Henderson
MEM wrote: My directory structure is: + rebelatehome + css - home8.css + images - hover.png + js So, if the css is inside css directory, to go to images directory from the css file, we have to, up one level: ../ enter one level /images/ and access the image:

Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-16 Thread MEM
Did you not get the repeated messages where I said that the links needed layout? Yes. :-) But Tim, please, you must assume that I'm really REALLY new on CSS. I have months of CSS. :s What does this mean? Well, I've said why I haven't done that yet: Because I haven't seen any relation to the

Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-16 Thread Alan Gresley
MEM wrote: I understand that the not displaying of the background images were not related with the not acceptance of the image, or the unsupported property for some reason, or conflict, or any other thing, now, and only now, I can understand that, we give zoom to give full height and, this

[css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-15 Thread MEM
Unfortunately, I needed to change some values. I'm not on good mood about that. Please on IE6 and IE7 the #slideShow div is hidden somewhere. If you are tired of repeating the things on and on, I understand. It happens that I've tried as I could, to clear floats, to use overflow, to add zoom.

Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-15 Thread David Laakso
MEM wrote: Please on IE6 and IE7 the #slideShow div is hidden somewhere. Issue on IE6 and IE7: http://www.nuvemk.com/rebelate/rebelatehome/home7.html #slideShow { position:absolute; --- :: delete :: }

Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-15 Thread Tim Snadden
On 16/09/2009, at 12:58 PM, David Laakso wrote: MEM wrote: Please on IE6 and IE7 the #slideShow div is hidden somewhere. Issue on IE6 and IE7: http://www.nuvemk.com/rebelate/rebelatehome/home7.html #slideShow { position:absolute; --- :: delete :: } David's solution

Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-15 Thread MEM
#slideShow { position:absolute; --- :: delete :: } AHrrGgghhh I've not seen it. I've never use absolute, arrrghh! Next time I see a CSS layout that I need to work over, with strange values like height defined, and fixed elements with no propose to be like that, I will not

Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-15 Thread MEM
David's solution will work for IE6. In IE7 you need to give #slideShow layout (zoom: 1 is one way). So when you say 'no luck' I don't know what you mean as zoom: 1 will fix it. I've mention zoom on my other post, however, it was related to the navigation. On this case, I'm using Microsoft

Re: [css-d] sorry - site re-check - haslayout?

2009-09-15 Thread Tim Snadden
On 16/09/2009, at 1:32 PM, MEM wrote: 2) Any clue to the fact that the background image isn't displaying on the menu on ie6 and ie7 ? Did you not get the repeated messages where I said that the links needed layout? Here is what I said: Also, I think I said before that you should give