Re: [VOTE] AIP-52 Automatic setup and teardown tasks

+1 (binding) -Felix Sent from Proton Mail for iOS On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 22:05, Pierre Jeambrun wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Le lun. 9 janv. 2023 à 21:12, Vikram Koka a > écrit : > >> +1 binding >> >> Vikram >> >> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 11:23 AM Ping Zhang wrote: >> >>> +1 binding >>> >>> Than

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer Niko Oliveira (o-nikolas)

Congrats! Sent from Proton Mail for iOS On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 22:23, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Congrats Niko! > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 10:22 PM Elad Kalif wrote: > >> Hello Airflow Community, >> >> I am happy to announce that the Project Management Committee (PMC) for >> Apache Airflow >> has

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Breeze rewrite to Python finally completed !!! Congrats to Bowrna, Edith (and Elad as mentor)!

Congrats & Well done! I love the new breeze! 🤩 It is so much more user-friendly now. Best, Felix Sent from Proton Mail for iOS On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 06:45, Bowrna Prabhakaran wrote: > Congratulations Jarek! Your major contribution is one major reason for > completing this Breeze rewrite pro

Re: [VOTE] September 2022 PR of the Month

My vote also goes to https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400 Best, Felix Sent from Proton Mail for iOS On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 01:30, Kaxil Naik wrote: > My vote goes for https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400 > > On Tue, 27 Sept 2022 at 21:00, Jeambrun Pierre wrote: > >> I also li

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] enable string normalization on black

+1 (binding) Best, Felix Sent from Proton Mail for iOS On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 19:10, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > For clarity for those who didn't read the thread: > > This change will be applied just before 2.5 is going to be released (to avoid > making cherry picks difficult) > > -a > > On 2

Re: [DISCUSS] string normalization in black

Totally for it! That’s not true actually. Black won’t reformat strings using f-string if you use single quotes for the string and double quotes within e.g. when passing a str.join statement as a value which uses double quotes. So you can still have a mixture of both in the codebase but it will

Re: [LAZY CONSENSUS] consolidate scheduling params with new param `schedule`

+1 (non-binding) Best, Felix Sent from Proton Mail for iOS On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 19:29, Jeambrun Pierre wrote: > + 1 (non-binding) > > Regards, > Pierre Jeambrun

Re: [DISCUSS] consolidate dag scheduling params

Hi Ping, I had this idea about auto-fixing deprecation warnings too when I started the airflint project. I totally agree with what you said that often people ignore these warnings and therefore a cli tool would come in very handy. It could look similar to the airflint project and also be based

Re: Auto-registering of DAGs in DAG file? (no `as dag` needed?)

practices: > https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/best-practices.html#top-level-python-code > > On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 at 16:48, Felix Uellendall wrote: > >> Hey Ash, >> >> I personally don't like it, because it is not obvious to me. >> >> Also

Re: Auto-registering of DAGs in DAG file? (no `as dag` needed?)

Hey Ash, I personally don't like it, because it is not obvious to me. Also what happens if you return the `dag_2` variable and set the return value in the global context to `dag_2` as well? This is how I used to do it when generating DAGs - and in my opinion this is pythonic way of doing it wit

Re: [DISCUSS] "Magic Loop" as fist class citizen in Airflow ?

I really like that - in my opinion definitely worth a note in the docs. Let's just make sure we warn users of side effects which you already mentioned here. From what I can say about dynamic dag generation at Trade Republic is that it was a huge pain for us to get it done right. So that it does

Re: HIding/Archiving JIRA project for Airflow

Nice! 👍 Thanks Jarek. :) Best, Felix Sent from Proton Mail for iOS On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 22:05, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > FYI. Infra changed the permission so that you need to be logged in to see the > issues. That will hopefully stop the old JIRA issues from being indexed and > they will all-

Re: [DISCUSS] Converting airflow's CLI to "click" and "rich_click" External Inbox airflow-dev

I am using typer which is build on top of click for airflow-digrams cli. I like it a lot. - Felix Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 21:45, Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > +1 for the idea, I’ve used click for few clis and the experience is > definitely better than argparse. Integr

Re: [DISCUSS] how to name classes with abbreviations?

Sorry in this case I would be NOT in favor of pep8. I misread it. -feluelle Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 07:22, Felix Uellendall wrote: > I am in favor of pep8 guidelines. I think it makes sense to clearly see > separation between words/tokens. For me upperc

Re: [DISCUSS] how to name classes with abbreviations?

I am in favor of pep8 guidelines. I think it makes sense to clearly see separation between words/tokens. For me uppercase is harder to read and I don’t like getting screamed at. As long as there is documentation, this can be written there correctly as you can split it like normal words (by space

Re: [VOTE] AIP-42 Dynamic Task Mapping

Definitely +1 (non-binding) Sent from ProtonMail for iOS On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 19:28, Daniel Standish wrote: > +1 (binding) > >>

Re: New Committers: James Timmins, Elad Kalif & Daniel Standish

Congrats! Well deserved! :) Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 16:42, Vikram Koka wrote: > Congratulations James, Elad, and Daniel, great work! > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 6:57 AM Ry Walker wrote: > >> Congrats to all the new committers - appreciate the effort! >> >> On Mon, Mar

Re: New Airflow Committer: Vikram Koka

Congrats Vikram! Well deserved! Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 17:56, Tobiasz Kędzierski wrote: > Congrats Vikram! > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 5:04 PM Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > >> Congratulations Vikram! >> >> T. >> >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 4:46 PM Jarek Potiuk wrot

Re: Apache Airflow 2.0.0 is released!

Great job everyone! 🎉👏 Really amazing work from all of you! Thanks.-Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 19:08, Gerard Casas Saez wrote: > Yass! 🎉 🎉 🎉 🎉 🎉 🎉 > Great news! > > Gerard Casas Saez > Twitter | Cortex | [@casassaez](http://twitter.com/casassaez) > > On Thu, De

Re: Apache Airflow 2.0.0 is released!

Great job everyone! 🎉👏 Really amazing work from all of you! Thanks. -Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 18:59, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > WOHOO! > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 6:54 PM Shaw, Damian P. > wrote: > >> Great news! Is there a single web page that highlights these m

Re: Default Extras for Airflow 2.0

ficial vote, we only care if >> someone objects :D >> >> -a >> >> On Fri, 4 Dec, 2020 at 21:41, Felix Uellendall >> wrote: >> >>> Makes sense to me. I am actually curious how many people use the imap >>> provider? If anyone does ple

Re: Default Extras for Airflow 2.0

Makes sense to me. I am actually curious how many people use the imap provider? If anyone does please let me know - just wondering who else has to process email attachments. 😅 +1 (if that’s is supposed to be an official voting - don’t see a voting prefix in the email subject. Isn’t that require

Re: AIP-9 Automated Dependency Management

> automatically upgrades to the latest "good" set of non-conflicting > dependencies for Airlfow (both 2.0 and 1.10). > > Yet another AIP completed. I will mark it as such. > > J. > > On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 8:46 PM Felix Uellendall > wrote: > >> Sounds goo

Re: AIP-9 Automated Dependency Management

ave anything else to do? I am asking because I would like to update > the status in JIRA. > > Best regards, > Kamil Breguła > > On 2019/01/12 16:21:27, Felix Uellendall wrote: >> Hey all,> >> >> I have just created AIP-9 and would love to hear yo

Re: Discuss: should we allow HTML emails on dev@ list

+1 On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 20:14, Kamil Breguła wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020, 19:52 Tao Feng wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:05 Daniel Imberman >> wrote: >> >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > via Newton Mail >> > >> > [ >> > >> https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=d

Re: Move "Who uses Airflow?" (to Ecosystem? or new "users" page)?

I think that‘s a good idea to move it to the official website of Airflow instead of the code repository. A while ago I also thought about moving it somewhere else into a different file of the repo - but the Airflow website in my opinion is the best place for it which will also probably reach mo

Re: [VOTE] AIP-34 TaskGroup: A UI task grouping concept as an alternative to SubDagOperator

+1 (binding) Felix On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 15:15, James Coder wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > James Coder > >> On Aug 25, 2020, at 9:08 AM, Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> T. >> >> >>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 3:02 PM Jarek Potiuk >>> wrote: >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> On Tue

Re: new committer: QP Hou

Congrats and welcome QP! 😊 Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 19:43, Kevin Yang wrote: > Congrats! Welcome QP. > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:35 AM Tomasz Urbaszek > wrote: > >> Congrats QP! >> >> T. >> >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 7:31 PM Tao Feng wrote: >> >> > Welcome QP! >>

Re: [VOTE] Moving of the transfer operators to new packages

+1 binding Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 09:25, Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > +1 binding > > T. > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 9:13 AM Kamil Breguła > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Following the discussion >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbf69247f8d4702a1b3770ab4891d90d

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving of the transfer operators to new packages

I really like the idea, too. It makes the users search for transfers a lot easier. Best Regards, Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 15:59, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > I definitely like the idea - if we can discussion and voting on it before > we prepare backport package final

Re: [VOTE] Naming of the transfer operators/Hooks

+1 for [1] XToYOperator Best Regards, Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 13:58, Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 for [1] XToYOperator > > On Sat, May 30, 2020, 12:56 Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > >> +1 for XToYOperator >> >> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 1:30 PM Bas Harenslak >> wrote: >>

Re: [VOTE] Make conn_id unique in Airflow (a.k.a. Remove connection balancing HA )

+1 Best regards, Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 17:11, Andrew Harmon wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Thanks, > Andrew Harmon > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 10:24 AM Jiajie Zhong > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Best Wish >> — Jiajie >> >>

Re: New committer: Jiajie Zhong

Welcome Jiajie! Congrats! Well deserved! :tada: Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 19:50, Sid Anand wrote: > Hi Jarek, > When you have time, please add this news to > > 1. Airflow twitter account > 2. Announcements wiki : > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/An

Re: Big performance optimization of Scheduler - 10x faster , 2000+ fewer queries count

Really awesome indeed! I hadn’t enough time to look into all of it yet but will definitely do. Thanks Polidea and Databand for your efforts you put into this! Kamil especially! -Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 08:54, Sumit Maheshwari wrote: > Awesome work guys!! Ku

Re: [NON-TECHNICAL] [DISCUSS] Being even more welcoming community ?

Hey Jarek, I really like the points you bring up. While reading your mail I thought about the same things. For me at the beginning it was really hard to get into this community and how everything works mostly because of the language. I am not sure but maybe it would also be a good idea to organ

Re: New Committer: Tomasz Urbaszek

Congrats Tomek! Well deserved :) ! Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 16:10, Michał Słowikowski wrote: > Great job Tomek! Congratulations! > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 3:58 PM cla.klaus > wrote: > >> Congratulations Tomasz!Claudio >> Messaggio originale Da: "D

Re: [VOTE] Add Probot Integrations to Airflow Github Repo

+1 Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 14:17, Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > +1 for all four. > T. > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 2:12 PM Kamil Breguła > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 8:43 AM Jarek Potiuk >> wrote: >> >> > +100 >> > >> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 7:02 AM

Re: [VOTE] Allow using asserts in Airflow code

-1 (binding) I agree. There shouldn’t be any confusion around this if we want to introduce this. The old/current assertion style still looks more readable to me. Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 23:35, Kevin Yang wrote: > -1 (binding). > > People in the old thread has

Re: New PMC members: Aizhamal and Kevin

Congrats Kevin & Aizhamal! Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 18:21, Daniel Imberman wrote: > Congrats!! > > via Newton Mail > [https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=dx&cv=10.0.32&pv=10.14.5&source=email_footer_2] > On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:17 PM, Pablo Estrada > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Accept new Airflow website contribution

+1 (binding) love it. Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 08:16, Tao Feng wrote: > +1 (binding), this is super cool :) > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:15 PM Maxime Beauchemin < > maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) this is amazing! >> >> it's hard to believe that

Re: [Discuss] Airflow Summits 2020

Airflow Running Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 17:22, Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > +1 for Airflow Current > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 17:09, Philippe Gagnon wrote: > >> Airflow Current? >> >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 5:52 AM Tomasz Urbaszek < >> tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com> >>

Re: [VOTE] 2nd attempt for AIP-21 update for Airflow 1.10.* backportability

+1 (binding) Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 12:46, Kamil Breguła wrote: > +1 (binding) > > All my comments were taken into account during the discussion. I am happy now. > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 12:37 PM Jarek Potiuk > wrote: >> >> Some binding votes here please

Re: Drop Python 3.5 support?

Absolutely +1. In my opinion that should come together with the drop of Python 2.7. So I mean target that for 2.0 as well. WDYT? Or is it more like sth. for 2.1? Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 23:02, Kamil Breguła wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:48 PM Ka

Re: [Final review] Airflow website + need your input to the web copy

I like the animation, too. :) Maybe we can also change the animation a bit so that the squares do not disappear and instead bounce back when they hit the borders. +1 for Dark Mode (but actually even I am a dark mode user I really like the current one with white background) As Jarek said I think

Re: Inconsistent class names for AWS integrations

+1 Isn’t that already covered by AIP-21? Only what Jarek mentioned regarding the backporting to 1.10 isn’t I think. I would go for “providers/amazon/aws” as well just to be consistent. Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:05, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Few comments: > > -

Re: New promotional materials for Airflow

Thanks Kamil. I love the cup 👍 The coffee tastes so much better now :) Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 16:42, Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > Awesome Kamil! > > On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 at 16:02, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >> Cool! >> >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 3:53 PM Kamil Breguła >> wr

Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate to Pytest

hould we proceed with >>> official >>> > >> vote for AIP-27 >>> > >> < >>> > >> >>> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-27+Migrate+to+pytest >>> > >>> >>> >

Re: Apache Airflow 1.10.6 released!

Thanks Ash :) Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 07:32, Driesprong, Fokko wrote: > Awesome, thanks Ash for doing the release! > > Cheers, Fokko > > Op di 29 okt. 2019 om 05:09 schreef Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < > aizha...@apache.org>: > >> Thanks Ash and everyone who was involved

Re: New PMC Member: Jarek Potiuk

Congrats Jarek! Well deserved. Keep on doing this awesome work. :) Thanks, Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 23:12, Kevin Yang wrote: > Congrats! Well deserved. > > Ash Berlin-Taylor 于2019年10月18日 周五下午2:08写道： > >> And we'll deserved too! Congrats. >> >> -a >> >> On 18 Oc

Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate to Pytest

+1, successfully using pytest for airflow plugins for almost 2 years now. Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 16:39, Daniel Imberman wrote: > Huge +1 from me on this one! > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:46 AM Bas Harenslak < > basharens...@godatadriven.com> wrote: > >> Bi

Re: AIP-21 - grouping google operators

+1 for providers Having google, azure, etc. right next to hooks, operators modules just does not fit in the context of this module level imo. Except for the kubernetes module all module names are more generic. Felix Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 21:05, Driesprong, Fokko w

Re: Refactor integration.rst and full list of operators and hooks

Kamil, I am not sure what the next steps towards the docs are but should we already update the Pull Request Template and add a reference to the updated section? I think this would make it easier to find the related docs. I am not sure how much we want to describe in that template. Speaking of t

Re: AIP-21 (Move operators to Core) - "cross_transfer" packages

In my opinion the source of the transfer operation is what matters - without knowing the source you don‘t need to know where it can be transferred to. So I prefer to put those „cross transfer“ operators to its source. For example: GoogleApiToS3 -> gcp Best Regards, Felix Sent from ProtonMail M

Re: AIP-7 completed :)

:tada Thank you Jarek for your hard work. I think it was really worth it :) I absolutely prefer Breeze + pre-commit hooks to the local env we used before. Thank you very much again! Best Regards, Felix Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On Sep 19, 2019, 04:01, Kevin

Re: [PLEASE PARTICIPATE][AIP-11] UX phase of Airflow website

First of all thank you for doing this. I think a website is a really big plus to airflow. Your prototype looks amazing to me. I like the design, font, the new logo ofc ;) and the overall structure of this website. However I also noticed the disappearance of the nav bar. I like the nav bar and w

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Please welcome new Airflow committer Felix Uellendall

gt; > > Congratulations! >> > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Sep 9, [2019](tel:2019), 09:10 Kaxil Naik >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Congratulations Felix >> > > > > > >> >

Re: "Breeze" dev environment

Great job Jarek! Thanks. I am looking forward to try it out as soon as I am back from holiday :) Felix Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On Aug 28, 2019, 10:34, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Just FYI. We had some "teething" problems (of course) at the workshop but > fixes

Re: [IE] Re: [VOTE] Change the Airflow logo

Option 1 Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On Aug 22, 2019, 08:42, Chao-Han Tsai wrote: > Option 1. > > On Wed, Aug 21, [2019](tel:2019) at 11:22 AM Bolke de Bruin > wrote: > >> Option X >> >> (Want to be outside of the box 🙃) >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On 2

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Please welcome new Airflow committer Chao-han Tsai

Congrats Chao-Han! I really appreciate your work on improving subdags. :) Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On Aug 20, 2019, 05:40, Maxime Beauchemin wrote: > We'll deserved! Welcome aboard! > > On Mon, Aug 19, [2019](tel:2019), 9:54 AM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy > wrot

Re: [DISCUSS] Tweaks to the Airflow logo

+1 looks so much cleaner and more modern :) Felix Am 13/08/2019 um 16:29 schrieb Nathan Maynes: > I like the change from gradients to flat. It makes it less busy and is > especially helpful for small sizes. > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 6:28 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> He

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.10.4 from RC5

+1 (non-binding) Tested: - running example dags on Sequential and LocalExecutor - classic UI and RBAC UI (connections, variables, pools, xcom, logs) There is a small issue with the logs containing symbols for coloring instead of actual coloring it in the UI - symbols are for bash only. Maybe we

Re: [DISCUSS] Back to (some) dependency pinning

I understand what Ash and Jarek are saying. I actually use airflow with custom plugins to have a end-product that fully satisfy our needs and when writing new hooks and operators I don't want to see "airflow uses requirement foo=1 but you have foo=2" - but actually that sometimes also just works

Re: [DISCUSS] Back to (some) dependency pinning

Hey Jarek, sounds good, but actually I would probably go with pinning everything by default and have a "Dependency Bot" testing new releases of packages. But regarding of the big amount of computing (=costs) we already have by running our ci pipeline we cannot set up a Dependency Bot at the mome

Re: [VOTE] Changes in import paths

I have no strong "No" against any proposed change of these cases. So I go with +1 (non-binding). P.S. Thanks Jarek for bringing this up again and your intense work towards airflow currently :) and thanks to Kamil for even creating this document. I like how the code is getting more and more cons

Propagate skipped state from inside subdag to parent dag

Hey all, I am wondering if there should be an "official" way to propagate a skipped state of the last downstream tasks in a subdag to the parent dag. Simple Use Case: I have a subdag with the following tasks "transfer data from an api to s3", "convert json to csv", "transform csv". Sometimes th

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.10.4 from RC3

No opinion >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... >>>>>> >>>>>> Changes since RC2: >>>>>> >>>>>> [AIRFLOW-XXX] Update changelog for [1.10.4](tel:1104)rc3 [Ash >>>>>> Berlin-Taylor] >>&

Re: [PROPOSE] Introduce and encourage pre-commit hooks framework to Airflow developer workflow

+1 (non-binding), I love that. I use a git pre-commit bash script but I think the framework looks even better. :) -feluelle Original Message On Jul 2, 2019, 19:48, Maxime Beauchemin wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Jul 1, [2019](tel:2019) at 11:20 PM Kaxil Naik > wrote: > >> +1 We ha

Re: [VOTE] Labelling scheme for the upcoming official docker images of Airflow

+1 (non-binding) from my side. I really like the naming. The only thing I can think of would be to change python to py to have a slightly shorter name. -feluelle Original Message On Jul 2, 2019, 08:34, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Just to remind - the vote is up till Thursday 7am CES

Re: [2.0 spring cleaning] Remove `dag >> task`?

Definitly +1 for removing this whatever this is supposed to mean :D -feluelle Original Message On Jul 3, 2019, 20:03, Driesprong, Fokko wrote: > I think this is very awkward, +1 on removing > > Op wo 3 jul. [2019](tel:2019) om 19:57 schreef Kamil Breguła > >: > >> This is very

Re: I have joined Astronomer full-time !!

Congrats Kaxil :) Am 22/06/2019 um 08:23 schrieb Driesprong, Fokko: > Awesome news! Congrats on the move and enjoy your wedding! :-) > > Cheers, Fokko > > Op za 22 jun. 2019 om 05:38 schreef Chao-Han Tsai : > >> Congrats Kaxil, good news! >> >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 7:07 PM Jiajie Zhong >> wrot

[DISCUSS] Pull Request Improvements

Hey all, Pull request are currently often forgotten after they moved to the second page and I think this is really frustrating for pr's authors to wait so long for their pr's getting merged and we can and should do more about it. Our number of committers is growing, but I think we can also impr

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Please welcome new Airflow committer Kamil Breguła

Congrats Kamil and everyone else who recently became a commiter. Thank you for what you guys do. I like it how the community and especially the committers are growing :) -feluelle Am 01/05/2019 um 12:57 schrieb Feng Lu: Congrats Kamil! On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 7:44 PM Jiajie Zhong wrote: Co

Re: [VOTE] AIP-6 Apply Pylint to Airflow

36728 Maybe we should do it as we did for Flake8, and do diff's between new PR's and master first. Cheers, Fokko Op za 13 apr. 2019 om 10:47 schreef Felix Uellendall < felix.uellend...@gmx.de<mailto:felix.uellend...@gmx.de>>: +1 (non-binding) -feluelle Am 13/04/2019

Re: [DISCUSS]: Remove Mesos Executor from Airflow 2.0.0?

+1 (non-binding) Am 12/04/2019 um 23:42 schrieb Tao Feng: +1 on removing mesos executor. On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:25 PM Daniel Imberman wrote: Since we are now doing version 2.0 spring cleaning can we revisit this? On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 8:38 AM Maxime Beauchemin < maximebeauche...@gmail.

Re: Airflow 1.10.3 has been released!

Thanks Ash :) Am 13/04/2019 um 01:33 schrieb Maxime Beauchemin: Infinite kudos! Thanks Ash! On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 1:33 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: Thanks Ash and all the contributors. On Fri, Apr 12, 2019, 20:38 Robin Edwards wrote: Yes thanks everyone for their hard work :-) R On Fri, 12 A

Re: [2.0 spring cleaning] Deprecate contrib folder?

+1 on deprecating the contrib folder. Bolk de Bruin the reason the core hooks and operators are properly tested because, for example I added some more tests to it and I am "only" a contributor. So do you really want to split up contributors work and core committers work? I personally think this

Re: [VOTE] AIP-10: Multi-layered and multi-stage official Airflow image

+1 (non-binding) Am 13/04/2019 um 02:55 schrieb Daniel Imberman: +1 (binding) On Fri, Apr 12, 2019, 4:58 PM Tao Feng wrote: +1 binding On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 2:06 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: +1 binding On Mon, Apr 8, 2019, 21:50 Maxime Beauchemin +1 binding Max On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 5:23 P

Re: [2.0 spring cleaning] Deprecate subdags

-1 on deprecating subdags, because of the extra level of abstraction some of you already mentioned. We also use subdags in production. For example in cases where we get json data from an API but since we mostly need it to be in csv format we have a subdag like /specific_ap//i_specific_endpoint/_

Re: [VOTE] AIP-6 Apply Pylint to Airflow

+1 (non-binding) -feluelle Am 13/04/2019 um 07:53 schrieb Chao-Han Tsai: +1 (non-binding) On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 8:05 AM Chen Tong wrote: +1 (non-binding). On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 9:28 AM Julian De Ruiter < julianderui...@godatadriven.com> wrote: I also wouldn’t mind including black for

Re: [VOTE] Accept AIP-3: Drop support for Python 2

+1 (non-binding) Am 24/03/2019 um 11:23 schrieb Kamil Breguła: +1 (non-binding) It will make life simpler On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 9:38 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote: +1 (non-binding). Happy to help in that effort :) On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 9:31 AM Bas Harenslak < basharens...@godatadriven.com> wrot

Re: Welcoming Xiaodong Deng as a new commiter!

Congratulations XD! I'm happy for you :) Am 07/03/2019 um 14:24 schrieb Ash Berlin-Taylor: Hello Airflowers, Please join the Apache Airflow PMC in welcoming our newest committer: Xiaodong Deng (a.k.a. XD-DENG ). XD has been an active member of the community helpin

Re: API Reference - current confusion and improvement plan

+1 I love it. :)) Am 05/02/2019 um 21:03 schrieb Kaxil Naik: +1 I like this On Tue, Feb 5, 2019, 19:59 Tao Feng +1 as well, I like the layout for the new doc. On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 11:57 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: I like the API reference v2 layout a lot! Much easier to navigate and see

Re: [PROPOSAL] Add a landing page for Apache Airflow

Hey, I like this idea :) +1 -feluelle Am 24/01/2019 um 23:58 schrieb Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy: Hello everyone! I was wondering what the community thinks about the idea of adding a nice landing page for Airflow website. I imagine a landing page with short description of the product, core featur

Re: [VOTE] Airflow 1.10.2rc3

+1 (non-binding) I could not found any more blocker issues. I ran all example dags and some of our own dags via RBAC UI. - feluelle Am 19/01/2019 um 17:35 schrieb Kaxil Naik: Hey all, I have cut Airflow 1.10.2 RC3. This email is calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours. C

Re: [VOTE] Airflow 1.10.2rc2

Hey kaxil, I want to let you know there is an issue since 1.10.2rc1 when you trigger a dag via the Pause/UnPause button. We discussed it here https://apache-airflow.slack.com/archives/CCQ7EGB1P/p1547855016439700?thread_ts=1547855016.439700&cid=CCQ7EGB1P Kind regards, Felix Uellendall

Re: Airflow 1.10.2b1 available now on PyPI - PLEASE TEST

Hey kaxil, thank your for running this release. :) I just want to let you know some duplicate lines in the CHANGELOG.txt: * https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/v1-10-stable/CHANGELOG.txt#L52 duplicates https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/v1-10-stable/CHANGELOG.txt#L87 * https://github.c

AIP-9 Automated Dependency Management

Hey all, I have just created AIP-9 and would love to hear your feedback on this. It's about Dependency Management in Airflow and how we could improve it. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-9+Automated+Dependency+Management Best regards, Felix Uellendall

AIP Access

Hey all, I would like to request access to create an AIP on confluence. My Confluence ID is "feluelle". Best regards, Felix Uellendall

Re: AIP-8 Split Hooks/Operators into Separate Packages

Regardless of how complex this implementation would be I am +1 on this. From the developer's point of view that the CI would run so much faster is the biggest plus for me. I think It will only become worse the more dependencies we add. From the user's point of view that I am able to choose from

Re: [DISCUSS] Deprecate KnownEvent/KnownEventType

+1 Am 02/01/2019 um 22:52 schrieb Tao Feng: +1, but I think we still need the migration script for the change. On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:44 PM Bas Harenslak wrote: +1 On 2 Jan 2019, at 22:42, Daniel Imberman wrote: +1 On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:18 PM Maxime Beauchemin < maximebeauche...@