---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28049/#review62950
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rajani Karuturi
On Nov. 24, 2014, 4:23
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28043/#review62953
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rajani Karuturi
On Nov. 17, 2014, 6:26
On Nov. 25, 2014, 8:15 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Ship It!
pushed to 4.5 commit: ba6dfd84702eeef0362b94068add1328db84133a
will merge to master as well
- Rajani
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
On Nov. 25, 2014, 8:14 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Ship It!
Thanks for adding tests. pushed to 4.5 c919ff83d81528b89017b5f5731b2e46350e3dfa
will merge to master as well.
- Rajani
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20518/#review62955
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Rajani Karuturi
On Nov. 25, 2014, 6:06
On Nov. 25, 2014, 8:16 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Ship It!
pushed to 4.5. commit eae733817b3670b0151410c027325f78013392ad
will merge to master as well.
- Rajani
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17941/#review62957
---
I tried to merge it on 4.5/master, there were few issues. There is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17941/#review62958
---
LGTM.
- Rohit Yadav
On Nov. 25, 2014, 6:07 a.m., Harikrishna
Good ideas, I’ll use them. So I think no one disagrees with this;
- list VMs still has user_id, but deployVM won’t
- We’ll use first user in the account if someone’s impersonating; else use
logged in user to get user_id
On 25-Nov-2014, at 12:17 am, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.com wrote:
Anybody else seeing this?
@Ian, please confirm this is a regression compared to 4.4.1. Ans can
you describe the scenario/is this a regular template test or a
systemvm template?
I will not regard this a blocker without confirmation. We have enough
+1 binding but I will extend voting a bit.
Daan
Thanks for keeping at it Rajani,
I gave up yesterday on merging the 4.4.2 to 4.5.0 upgrade code after
it resulted in a merge mess. These changes are not in your pull
request (yet?). Also I see travis failures mentioned. So I think we
are not ready for this.
The upgrade code contained quite some
I'll upgrade my test setup (4.4.1) today and get back to you.
Do I need a new systemvm or can I just leave the old one from 4.4.1 in place?
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
To: dev
Thanks Lucian, I am not sure what Ians failing scenario is? It might
be the download process that is failing and it might be the starting.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
I'll upgrade my test setup (4.4.1) today and get back to you.
Do I need a new systemvm or can
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28437/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs: cloudstack-6282
Hi Daan,
It was the importing of a standard template added via the UI. I will re-try
again today to ensure it wasn't a networking fault (unlikely) but the
messages about the host disconnecting randomly does have me concerned.
I was using the system vm template from jenkins.
On Nov. 25, 2014, 8:14 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Ship It!
Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Thanks for adding tests. pushed to 4.5
c919ff83d81528b89017b5f5731b2e46350e3dfa
will merge to master as well.
master 02ca6f2e5b7d8ffdc917ed09d8600c38e668ea17
- Rajani
On Nov. 25, 2014, 8:15 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Ship It!
Rajani Karuturi wrote:
pushed to 4.5 commit: ba6dfd84702eeef0362b94068add1328db84133a
will merge to master as well
master 93f82134129756946dabf90f05262cccb576d33c
- Rajani
On Nov. 25, 2014, 8:16 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Ship It!
Rajani Karuturi wrote:
pushed to 4.5. commit eae733817b3670b0151410c027325f78013392ad
will merge to master as well.
master 9585aa0b51a571d5ea3c33c98bec13f5230ecf4a
- Rajani
Github user karuturi closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/45
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Hi Daan,
It had your upgrade changes(a52fd08a142edc6a62e43838113bc504c225fa11). It
gave me some merge conflicts and resolved them in favour of master as the
changes are already there on master.
Checking the travis build history shows that there are failures in the past
builds as well. It may not
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Yes, there are so many wheels spinning...
Anyway, +1 from me, `yum update` went fine on both agent and management
(CentOS/KVM setup) from 4.4.1.
Killed a couple of systemVMs which regenerated fine, registered a new
template[1] and deployed an instance, all went OK.
[1] -
GitHub user spark404 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/46
Add improved support for packaging CloudStack for CentOS 7
This feature splits the packaging for CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 again. With the
introduction of tomcat7 and systemd to much changes to
Hi,
During CCCEU14 conference and over emails, I spoke with many CloudStack users
and I think most of us would like to have and use LTS releases. I propose that;
- We encourage a habit to backport a bugfix to all qualifying branches whether
or not those branches are LTS
- We contribute (unit,
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/46#issuecomment-64387309
Looks good, but I see most of the scripts in the new centos7 packaging is
the same including systemd init scripts, why not use ifs and elses? I'm
interested because
On Nov. 25, 2014, 8:14 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Ship It!
Rajani Karuturi wrote:
Thanks for adding tests. pushed to 4.5
c919ff83d81528b89017b5f5731b2e46350e3dfa
will merge to master as well.
Rajani Karuturi wrote:
master 02ca6f2e5b7d8ffdc917ed09d8600c38e668ea17
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/693/changes
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on commit
870ede5a04e5b832a13e6750e942215c81c4ee6c:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/870ede5a04e5b832a13e6750e942215c81c4ee6c#commitcomment-8715056
In packaging/centos7/replace.properties:
In packaging/centos7/replace.properties on
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
OK
Thanks Ian,
Pulling every thing you said out of context; I take this as a 0++. I
will be working on the release later today.
--
Daan
Hi,
On 11/25/2014 12:30 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi,
During CCCEU14 conference and over emails, I spoke with many CloudStack users
and I think most of us would like to have and use LTS releases. I propose
that;
- We encourage a habit to backport a bugfix to all qualifying branches
Repeated the whole process again, looks to be going OK this time round.
On 25 November 2014 at 10:21, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Hi Daan,
It was the importing of a standard template added via the UI. I will
re-try again today to ensure it wasn't a networking fault (unlikely) but
the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28390/#review62971
---
Ship it!
2805f51e433d4005469c656ed03854a83028637b 4.5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28327/#review62974
---
Ship it!
d7940cca1e731ad92f566d16ef040afbc407932a 4.5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28389/#review62976
---
Ship it!
825cae8d927218c987d2426417e1be354fb0f29d 4.5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28281/#review62978
---
Ship it!
0ce9439d371d8240add34da48f48533c9ef4cba6 4.5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28278/#review62980
---
Ship it!
c25b6fab122118bd9a0e4e14d103ac015e52ab5a 4.5
Like Wido, I also agree with LTS, but also think 4.3 is kind of old by now and
4.4.2 is looking good.
Perhaps take a step back and see how 4.5 goes and start with that one?
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Rohit Yadav
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28225/#review62982
---
Ship it!
7197f8c24a8fd661cd4fabacd564399a6e537439 4.5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28163/#review62984
---
Ship it!
df6078bb2d160d55c2c6b21fd3234187c8091a90 4.5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28161/#review62986
---
Ship it!
1bc13f753773a31ea4ca0ce90975147bca17142d 4.5
Hi Wido and Lucian,
There are many ways to get to a stable product including fixing coverity
issues, unit/integration tests etc. but one of those ways is to simply support
existing releases with bugfix releases because most CloudStack users just don’t
care about git workflows, or coverity or
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
The 4.4 branch does not contain many bugfixes which are in 4.3 and on
master/4.5.
That is worrying, Rohit. As the rest of your mail is already a vote of
distrust, this part says we should not release 4.4.2 as it
See
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist/494/
--
Started by upstream project cloudstack-4.3-maven-build build number 650
originally caused by:
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Rohit,
Agreed, I know very well how it is to get stuck with a certain version and
your (and everyone's) need for backports.
Your decision re 4.3 seems to make sense, it looks in good (blue?) shape.
4.5 is starting to look very interesting.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Daan,
I like 4.4 better than 4.3 for my use case and despite the bugs I hit it does
its job.
If I were to deploy today it would still be with 4.4. Hope this makes you feel
better. :-)
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
I do prefer 4.4 as well because it has GPU sharing and we actively test it.
Other bugs are not so important for us right now.
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 4:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
I like 4.4 better than 4.3 for my use case and despite the bugs I hit it does
its job.
If I were to deploy today it would still be with 4.4. Hope this makes you
feel better. :-)
It makes me feel the hero;) Seriously, I don't feel
Hey Daan,
On 25-Nov-2014, at 7:26 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
That is worrying, Rohit. As the rest of your mail is already a vote of
distrust, this part says we should not release 4.4.2 as it contains
regressions.
Looks like you skimmed my email and missed the following
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/695/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28437/#review62993
---
test/integration/component/test_escalations_networks.py
Rohit, I consider you my friend and colleague, I could reply on
everything said but do not want to escalate on all the details. The
only remark I want to make is that 4.4 is open for commits from here
on in.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hey Daan,
+1
for:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-package-rpm/
-- build 317
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-systemvm64/
-- build 171
Regards
Tom
2014-11-21 3:59 GMT+01:00 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.4.2
Top posting here as my remarks are mainly on the original topic.
I’m not in favor of supporting LTS releases as a community. The reasoning here
is that there is a huge chance that we will fragment the community in people
that just want to work on the latest and greatest and some other folks who
Github user spark404 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/46#issuecomment-64430200
@bhaisaab some of the files still need to be replaced, like the init
scripts for the other services. They are copied for now and will be replaced by
cents 7 counter
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27611/#review62996
---
test/integration/component/test_escalations_ipaddresses.py
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
- Original Message -
Hi,
During CCCEU14 conference and over emails, I spoke with many
CloudStack users and I think most of us would like to have and use
LTS releases. I propose that;
- We encourage a habit to backport a bugfix to all qualifying
branches whether or not those
I did this on AWS, works like a charm.
Sent from my iPhone
On 25 Nov 2014, at 1:19 pm, Madan Ganesh Velayudham madangan...@me.com
wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone tried to bring up simulator on any of the public cloud platforms
(AWS, Google Compute or others).
We’re trying to install
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/651/
--
[...truncated 6235 lines...]
remote: Compressing objects: 46% (49996/107975)
remote: Compressing objects: 46% (50109/107975)
remote: Compressing objects: 46%
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/652/
--
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started by an SCM change
Started
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/653/
--
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-a99
(cloudstack-buildslave-centos6) in workspace
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/654/changes
See
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist/495/changes
Instead of adding yet another parameter, could we look into adding a generic
filter as in:
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/APIReference/ApiReference-query-DescribeInstances.html
From: Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.commailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Reply-To:
I think unit tests are great for type checking and the like, but are there any
integration tests? If there is a change made to the CloudStack API (usually a
parameter is added to the response, rarely a semantic change), will some
automated test find the breakage if any?
Any plans to add any?
Does 4.4.2 require new set of systemvm compare to 4.4.1 ?
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Tomasz Zięba t.a.zi...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
for:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-package-rpm/
-- build 317
hi all,
I need help for a clean picture about the umbrella projects of cloudstack:
such as :
1. the umbrella project links in cloudstack.org homepage
2. the source code structure and relations with cloudstack source code in git
repos.
3. the rules for us to agree one as umbrella projects
I added 4.3.2 fixversion in jira and also moved unresolved tickets from
4.1.*, 4.2.*, 4.3.0 and 4.3.1 to 4.3.2
jira filter:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CLOUDSTACK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%204.3.2%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20
~Rajani
On Mon, Nov 24,
Github user damodarreddy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/46#issuecomment-64516356
Already a commit is pushed to support RHEL7 build/install at
7ea7deded031b43042c68db0f7c5c6c8b21c18c2.
Any problems with that commit?
---
If your
69 matches
Mail list logo
