On Sep 13, 2010, at 6:23 PM, Simon Metson wrote:
Hi James.
I think the thing to do is require that a document has a user field,
and that the value of that field matches the userCtx in the
validate_doc_update function. This then pushes the issue client side, and
makes the servers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12908431#action_12908431
]
J Chris Anderson commented on COUCHDB-869:
--
I just had a beautiful baby girl
On Sep 12, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
Hi all,
Sometimes we want to have secure_rewirtes off but only for one db,
design doc, for example if we want to write a futon like app on top
of couchdb. My idea is to set the default like we do know but adding
a new setting :
On Sep 5, 2010, at 8:49 PM, ithkuil wrote:
What advantages does BigCouch have over Lounge? Lounge seems fairly simple
which is a big plus, but since Cloudant is using BigCouch in their
commercial product that looks like a bigger plus.
Do either of these solutions take advantage of new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12901926#action_12901926
]
J Chris Anderson commented on COUCHDB-869:
--
I just had a beautiful baby girl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
J Chris Anderson updated COUCHDB-869:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was: I just had a beautiful baby girl named Irma, so I don't plan
On Aug 23, 2010, at 9:26 PM, Martin Murphy wrote:
Couchdb does not properly url decode usernames and passwords in the url.
This prevents the majority of non ASCII characters from being used in either
the username and password .This is a pretty high priority bug imo.
It prevents
On Aug 19, 2010, at 3:54 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
On 19 Aug 2010, at 09:58, Robert Newson wrote:
It seems impossible to guess when I should put things in trunk or on
branches. :)
I would use the following rule of thumb:
If the change is self-contained and relatively minor, commit to
I'll admit I'm a little lost here too. What is the change to $foo supposed to
allow for, and what is the downside to having it?
I think the example:
$app.$db.example.com = /$db/_design/$app/_rewrite
is actually pretty compelling *as a convenience feature.*
However, Jason is arguing that the
On Aug 19, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Jason Smith wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 02:28, J Chris Anderson jch...@apache.org wrote:
KEY POINT: Any CouchApp which is designed to require vhosts is
automatically not capable of running on localhost.
Until we solve this issue I'm not much interested
On Aug 16, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
Just one point from me. The distributed goop in Erlang is pretty much
just for the everyone-connected-to-everyone-else old school cluster
model. I don't think it's useful for the kind of scale I associate
with CouchDB at all.
Just my 1
On Aug 17, 2010, at 1:31 PM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
On Aug 16, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
Just one point from me. The distributed goop in Erlang is pretty much
just for the everyone-connected-to-everyone-else old school cluster
model. I don't think it's useful for the kind
On Aug 17, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 13:46, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On 17 Aug 2010, at 16:23, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
On Aug 17, 2010, at 4:32 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:
Developers (no matter if commercial or not) are part of the community
over every
document to both find the number of docs in a view slice (between
startkey and endkey) and then again to test inclusion between views.
I am interested in taking this forward and appreciate any code feedback.
thanks,
Norman
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 6:26 PM, J Chris Anderson jch
, 2010 at 2:33 PM, J Chris Anderson jch...@apache.org wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:15 PM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
Right, and jchris' db_repair branch includes my patches for DB reader
_admin access and a more useful progress report
is a WIKI page not yet
created
I can certainly live without email notifications. I don't need anymore email
On Aug 13, 2010, at 1:48 AM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
Devs,
With the help of code from Sebastian Cohnen and Paul Davis, I've imported
the wiki currently at http
On Aug 9, 2010, at 5:50 PM, whimsica wrote:
So far I'm very confused about how to get couchdb to talk to javascript on
the web page using show or view.
The challenge here is figuring out which javascript code runs in which context.
All the JS you've shown, runs on the server, not the
On Aug 13, 2010, at 7:56 AM, Robert Dionne wrote:
The home link is out of sync with the FrontPage.
Thanks. I'll think about how to fix that. I'd like to avoid deploying the
CouchDB version of the wiki as a fork of the basic Pages codebase, so maybe
it's worth it to rename FrontPage
Here is my first pass at notes on the repair tool.
I'd like to get this on the Apache website today so we can publicize it:
http://wiki.couchone.com/page/repair-tool
Please read, test, edit, give feedback, etc.
Thanks,
Chris
On Aug 13, 2010, at 7:05 AM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
On Aug 12
On Aug 13, 2010, at 9:26 AM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
Here is my first pass at notes on the repair tool.
I'd like to get this on the Apache website today so we can publicize it:
http://wiki.couchone.com/page/repair-tool
Sitting on our hands wasn't doing anyone any good, so I tweeted
+1
JS tests pass (except for cookie_auth, but the feature is fine and I blame the
failure on my dev box, not CouchDB)
make check passes
Erlang R14A (erts-5.8) [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [rq:2] [async-threads:0]
[hipe] [kernel-poll:false]
OS X Snow Leopard on an SSD MacBook Pro
Chris
On Aug
On Aug 11, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Jason Smith wrote:
Hi, Jason.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 04:14, Jason Smith j...@couch.io wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:52, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
Excellent, thanks for testing. I caught Jason Smith saying on IRC that he
had packaged
] [0.2.0] couch_db_repair writing 15 updates to bench_lost+found
Like maybe add a note like about 23% complete if at all possible.
I will patch the first few, I'd love help from someone on the last one. I'll be
on IRC.
Cheers,
Chris
On Aug 12, 2010, at 10:18 AM, J Chris Anderson wrote
started with _/database but I think it's too easy to miss at
the command line.)
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 00:52, J Chris Anderson jch...@gmail.com wrote:
A few bug reports from my testing:
I launched with this command, as specified in the README:
find ~/code/couchdb/tmp/lib -type f -name
On Aug 12, 2010, at 2:15 PM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
On Aug 12, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
Right, and jchris' db_repair branch includes my patches for DB reader _admin
access and a more useful progress report in the replication phase of the
repair.
I've updated
Devs,
With the help of code from Sebastian Cohnen and Paul Davis, I've imported the
wiki currently at http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb to a CouchApp.
Here it is:
http://wiki.couchdb.couchdb.org/page/FrontPage
The work is still preliminary. I haven't vetted all the content, and the wiki
On Aug 10, 2010, at 3:07 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
On 10 Aug 2010, at 06:36, J Chris Anderson wrote:
On Aug 9, 2010, at 10:15 PM, jch...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jchris
Date: Tue Aug 10 05:15:33 2010
New Revision: 983857
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=983857view=rev
Log
On Aug 10, 2010, at 11:58 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
Hey,
The following release problems were found:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-848
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-849
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-850
I will fix the
I have described a generalized repair algorithm which should work even for
CouchDB's that have been restarted multiple times leaving orphaned data in the
middle of the file (and valid headers after it)
Adam Kocoloski has offered to write the for Node in BtreeNodes part and
Volker Mische and I
as far as I can see.
Cheers
Jan
--
On 8 Aug 2010, at 11:45, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
On 8 Aug 2010, at 06:35, J Chris Anderson wrote:
On Aug 7, 2010, at 8:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
is this serious enough to justify pulling current 1.0.0 release
binaries to avoid further installs
On Aug 6, 2010, at 4:25 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
Hi all;
I've written this patch sometimes ago that add path authentification
to _rewrite handler :
http://github.com/benoitc/couchdb/commit/9c15cf8ed710db3805bd1a7d792ba53457cb9c48
So if you have a rule :
{
from: /somepath,
On Aug 5, 2010, at 4:32 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
Hi Norman,
I still plan to look at your code, I know the others here
are fairly busy too, sorry for the review delay :)
The code looks clean (but could use better comments about where in the flow
each module comes into play). I don't think
On Aug 3, 2010, at 8:28 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
Hi all,
It's been a while since I wrote the _replicator DB patch (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-776 ).
I'm thinking about commiting it into trunk soon, so it will be more
exposed for others to test it as well. Raise
On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:16 PM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:09 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
I saw a conversation on IRC tonight about bumping this thread. I noticed an
email from J. Chris in another thread saying he wanted to hold back from
1.0.1 until something was fixed
.
The patch has my review. Looks safe, simple and solid.
Thanks to Filipe who actually wrote it. I just committed it because he said he
was going to sleep right then and I couldn't stand to wait.
Chris
On Aug 3, 2010, at 11:46 AM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:16 PM, J Chris
.
The patch has my review. Looks safe, simple and solid.
I'd like to say it again. All clear!
Noah, do you mind rolling 1.0.1 so we can make the Ubuntu deadline?
I've updated NEWS and CHANGES for 1.0.1.
Chris
On Aug 3, 2010, at 11:46 AM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:16 PM, J
On Aug 3, 2010, at 3:50 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
On 3 Aug 2010, at 21:25, J Chris Anderson wrote:
I'd like to say it again. All clear!
Okay.
Noah, do you mind rolling 1.0.1 so we can make the Ubuntu deadline?
What exactly is the Ubuntu deadline?
It's basically now-ish:
https
On Aug 3, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
On 3 Aug 2010, at 23:52, J Chris Anderson wrote:
Noah, do you mind rolling 1.0.1 so we can make the Ubuntu deadline?
What exactly is the Ubuntu deadline?
It's basically now-ish:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MaverickReleaseSchedule
I'm
On Aug 3, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
On 4 Aug 2010, at 00:30, J Chris Anderson wrote:
Generally, we are now in the pink part of the chart. Ubuntu would be
happiest if we gave them releases in the yellow part of the chart. The
closer it gets to the red part of the chart
On Aug 3, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
On 4 Aug 2010, at 01:00, J Chris Anderson wrote:
Agreed. This is more like: we're ready and due for a release. I started
talking to some Ubuntu folks about it, and they were like it might be too
late and I was like even for bugfixes
On Aug 2, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Jason Smith wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 02:01, Mikeal Rogers mikeal.rog...@gmail.com wrote:
Moving the js process and the *new* view server interaction protocol in to
erlang is what I meant by this.
That is getting far afield. If people want it in future
On Aug 2, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
To clear things up.
There are 2 discussions happing in this thread:
1) what is the ideal API and protocol for a more capable query server?
(especially one that can react differentially to doc update failures, can
farm work out to multiple
On Aug 1, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Jason Smith wrote:
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 02:21, J Chris Anderson jch...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm totally +1 on getting rid of these rough edges. I seriously doubt I'll
have time to do anything but cheerlead, so if this is gonna happen, someone
is gonna have
alone.
Thoughts?
-Mikeal
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 11:38 AM, J Chris Anderson jch...@apache.org wrote:
On Aug 1, 2010, at 11:34 AM, Jason Smith wrote:
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 02:21, J Chris Anderson jch...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm totally +1 on getting rid of these rough edges. I seriously
On Jul 27, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Jason Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 04:35, Mikeal Rogers mikeal.rog...@gmail.comwrote:
After some conversations I've had in NYC this week and Mathias' great post
on the 10 biggest issues with CouchDB (
On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:09 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
I saw a conversation on IRC tonight about bumping this thread. I noticed an
email from J. Chris in another thread saying he wanted to hold back from
1.0.1 until something was fixed. Waiting for the all clear. Let me know.
All clear! I don't
On Jul 29, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Volker Mische wrote:
Hi GeoCouchers,
I currently try to hunt down a bug, if you've encountered similar problems,
please let me know.
I've created a spatial index but not all documents that should show up in the
index, do actually show up. You can easily
, 2010 at 8:23 PM, J Chris Anderson jch...@apache.org wrote:
On Jul 28, 2010, at 2:18 PM, Norman Barker wrote:
Hi Volker,
thanks for letting me know, in that case can we have clarification
from someone on the PMC?
This is a serious issue for US companies wanting to contribute to Couch
On Jul 27, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
Hey,
I have been asked to prepare the 1.0.1 release.
Before I do that, I would like to build consensus. If there's anything you'd
like to see in this release, or anything you'd like to see removed, now is
your time to speak. I'll give
, 2010 at 8:48 PM, J Chris Anderson jch...@apache.org
wrote:
On Jul 27, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
Hey,
I have been asked to prepare the 1.0.1 release.
Before I do that, I would like to build consensus. If there's anything
you'd like to see in this release, or anything you'd
saying when / how this is useful would help.
Thanks,
Chris
B.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 4:58 PM, J Chris Anderson jch...@gmail.com wrote:
Mikeal and I talked with Eric Florenzo about this change in Mochiweb at the
Github meetup. Apparently it's a *good thing* as the socket accept rewrite
On Jul 14, 2010, at 3:37 AM, Volker Mische wrote:
On 13.07.2010 19:56, J Chris Anderson wrote:
On Jul 13, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
This is very interesting. I am certainly game.
Fancy doing a bit of co-ordination, so we can post them on the same day and
do a link up
On Jul 14, 2010, at 7:40 AM, Zachary Zolton wrote:
Ah, just found it:
http://github.com/apache/couchdb/commit/6d88c8c6d66772a1dac1d351405eff9c513d263e
Looks like there's a new config setting for it:
[couch_httpd_auth]
authentication_redirect = /_utils/session.html
Nifty feature...
wrote:
Here ya go..in all it glory
http://willhartung.blogspot.com/2010/07/couch-10-retrospect.html
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 7:51 AM, Noah Slater nsla...@tumbolia.org wrote:
On 14 Jul 2010, at 15:06, J Chris Anderson wrote:
I've published mine here:
http://jchrisa.net/drl/_design
On Jul 14, 2010, at 4:57 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:
Time for me to add a tags filter to sofa's index _list, then I could
give you the feed for just my couchdb stuff!
it has that!
Here's your Atom feed of posts tagged CouchDB
Hey devs,
I'm working on a blog post about the last few years of my involvement with
CouchDB.
I think it would be really really fun to see this same story from as many other
people who can write it.
So if you've been active on this list for a couple of release cycles, please
write a quick
the round-up gets in the planet feed.
I have my post all written but am holding back posting for roughly 20 hrs.
Chris
On 13 Jul 2010, at 18:23, J Chris Anderson wrote:
Hey devs,
I'm working on a blog post about the last few years of my involvement with
CouchDB.
I think it would be really
On Jul 11, 2010, at 11:34 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Mikeal Rogers mikeal.rog...@gmail.com
wrote:
That sounds like additional work someone isn't going to do.
Featuring the planet more prominently leverages stuff we're already doing.
-Mikeal
I
On Jul 12, 2010, at 8:32 AM, mickael.bai...@free.fr wrote:
Hello y'all,
I don't know if it's a showstopper, but the current
_design/auth/validate_doc_update of the _users database seems buggy :
I can't delete a user. I use the tarball of 1.0.0 release, second round.
Thanks for the
On Jul 10, 2010, at 9:57 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Testing ASF email setup.
Testing ASF email reply setup.
ohai,
testing reply reply setup. #asf
On Jul 9, 2010, at 8:24 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
On 9 Jul 2010, at 16:20, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
I looked at the thread and these was the last patch that I saw.
user@ brought up the topic of a new design so I though I'd go and commit
that one. I'm not married to anything here and happy to
+1
all test pass
make check passes
OSX Snow Leopard
Erlang R13B03 (erts-5.7.4) [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [rq:2] [async-threads:0]
[kernel-poll:false]
On Jul 9, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
Hello,
I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.1 release, second round.
+1
all test pass
make check passes
OSX Snow Leopard
Erlang R13B03 (erts-5.7.4) [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [rq:2] [async-threads:0]
[kernel-poll:false]
Chris
On Jul 9, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
Hello,
I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round.
On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:
OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04, Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6
Have you ensured that you've cleared the browser cache?
Also, with Couch running on 5984, what do you get if you
On Jul 9, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Klaus Trainer wrote:
Anyway, it's good that the discussion has been brought up again ;)
fwiw I think I prefer the blue design also (but not so strongly as to be upset
if we end up stuck on the current new design)
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 23:52 +0200, Jan
On Jul 8, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Damien Katz wrote:
I broke that code. Sorry. Thanks to Filipe for the fix and test.
I agree with Adam we need to redo the release. Changing my vote to -1
I agree, let's roll it again now that these fixes are in and backported.
Thanks Noah!
Chris
-Damien
On Jul 6, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
I had started a page to capture the nuances of these settings at
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Durability_Matrix but never finished
it. It's possible some of the prose could be reshaped into a concise
summary of the difficult balancing act
On Jul 7, 2010, at 12:01 AM, Jason Smith wrote:
When is it appropriate for an authentication module to use the _users
database (or whatever it is configured to be)?
I am investigating OpenID 2.0 support. A requirent is to store a nonce
to protect against replay attacks. I am evaluating
On Jul 7, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
Hey,
I noticed that the NEWS and CHANGES for 1.0 and 0.11.1 are remarkably similar.
You can find both of these files under:
/branches/0.11.x
/branches/1.0.x
Can someone please edit the two files, in the two branches, until
On Jul 7, 2010, at 12:53 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
UPDATE
Apparently, a lot of these entries are bug fixes or refinement, which is fine.
Because we're doing a duel release, the same entries appear in the
CHANGES and NEWS files for both the 1.0.x and 0.11.x branches. We
could release this
+1
All browser tests are passing, as well as make check.
OSX Snow Leopard / Erlang R13B03
Chris
On Jul 7, 2010, at 4:38 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
Hello,
I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, first round.
We encourage the whole community to download and test these
+1
All browser tests are passing, as well as make check.
OSX Snow Leopard / Erlang R13B03
Chris
On Jul 7, 2010, at 4:36 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
Hello,
I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.11.1 release, first round.
We encourage the whole community to download and test
On Jul 6, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
Hey,
This has already been exhaustively discussed on the mailing list, so this is
more of a courtisy than anything else. Unless anyone has any significant
objections, I will be cutting trunk for the 1.0 release tomorrow, and will
call a
On Jul 6, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
Hey,
This has already been exhaustively discussed on the mailing list, so this is
more of a courtisy than anything else. Unless anyone has any significant
objections, I will be cutting trunk for the 1.0 release tomorrow, and will
call a
Maybe the thing to do is to put a note about this config item somewhere
prominent in Futon. The Configuration page is obvious, but not prominent
enough.
I've got a nice little paragraph sitting on the config page in Futon (good
enough, I think)
For the strongest consistency guarantees,
For a relatively sane look at the tradeoff's we're talking about, this is a
good resource:
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/runtime-config-wal.html
I wish it was simple to write a heuristic which would detect single serialized
client workloads, and delay commits, but I don't
wrote:
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Jan Lehnardt j...@apache.org wrote:
On 29 Jun 2010, at 16:38, Noah Slater wrote:
On 29 Jun 2010, at 15:20, J Chris Anderson wrote:
So I went through both trunk and 0.11.x looking for things that are out
of place. I fixed one small thing in 0.11.x
On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Robert Newson wrote:
It's a bit more subtle. If you exclusively single click to edit, the
patch works. Try double-clicking one field's value first (I was
changing the documents _id value). Now you can't edit other field
values.
whoops!
The goal with this was to
On Jun 26, 2010, at 7:00 PM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
[snip]
That's correct Mark. Trunk is what you want (although there are a few patches
that might not make 1.0)
I plan to start a thread for what to keep back for 1.1 and a thread for
anything that should be un-backported from 0.11.x
On Jun 29, 2010, at 7:38 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
Please can everyone check that make distcheck is working for them.
Let's try to avoid the test failures again for this release.
`make distcheck` failed with a list of all the .patch files and stuff laying
around my CouchDB trunk checkout.
On Jun 29, 2010, at 11:41 AM, David Coallier wrote:
On 29 June 2010 18:41, Adam Kocoloski kocol...@apache.org wrote:
On Jun 29, 2010, at 10:20 AM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
For trunk, I think there are a couple of small patches that Adam wants to
hold back for 1.1.
Not a big deal
On Jun 26, 2010, at 6:50 PM, Mark Hammond wrote:
On 27/06/2010 5:35 AM, Damien Katz wrote:
This looks like the auth_cache process can't create the _users db,
though I'm not sure why it would have that problem. It might be
windows can't create dbs at all.
It did create
I'm a little confused.
Last week I mentioned that we should cut trunk from 1.0, after reviewing the
diff between 0.11.x and trunk, and seeing that every change in trunk I could be
confident is release quality.
Now we've done a bunch of backporting to 0.11.x, which is bringing it closer to
(or method renames) etc that are in 1.1 but not 1.0.
Chris
Cheers
Jan
--
On 25 Jun 2010, at 19:23, J Chris Anderson wrote:
I'm a little confused.
Last week I mentioned that we should cut trunk from 1.0, after reviewing the
diff between 0.11.x and trunk, and seeing that every
On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
On 25 Jun 2010, at 18:36, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
I don't care much either way about where to cut 1.0 from at this point
except I wish this would have been brought up earlier so I didn't had to
waste a lot of time on the backports.
I do.
On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
On 25 Jun 2010, at 18:36, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
I don't care much either way about where to cut 1.0 from at this point
except I wish this would have been brought up earlier so I didn't had to
waste a lot of time on the backports.
I do.
On Jun 25, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:
Thanks for the clarifications, Jan.
All makes sense now. 0.11.x has to continue to exist and be fulfill
its stated use.
New features should be reverted out of there.
Sounds good to me, but I'm not sure about what's worth removing from
On Jun 25, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:
Thanks for the clarifications, Jan.
All makes sense now. 0.11.x has to continue to exist and be fulfill
its stated use.
New features should be reverted out of there.
Sounds good to me, but I'm not sure about what's worth removing from
On Jun 23, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Paul Bonser wrote:
It'd probably be good to get this in 1.0:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-748
Not a big bug, but not a big patch either, and it affects anyone with
, , or in their docids or view keys.
I got all set to commit this, except
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Stephen Prater wrote:
Actually, just a particular view server test.
The one that's rpsec definition is query server that exits only goes to 2
list should exit if erlang sends too many rows.
I'm not a 100% sure exactly what this test is ... testing - perhaps
based on the rows (eg you have to set headers
before the first getRow() call). But fixing this will require some thinking...
Chris
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:02 AM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:37 AM, Stephen Prater wrote:
Actually, just a particular view server test
On Jun 13, 2010, at 3:24 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
The 0.11 branch still feels weird to me. I thought commits on release
branches were supposed to be bugfixes only. With 0.11.x the criteria seem to
be
1) bugfixes
2) anything committed to trunk by Damien
3) anything else needed to
On Jun 11, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
I pinged the infrastructure guys. They said that there are projects
using Google Analytics. The only other thing was that vgritsenko doing
log file analysis [1].
+1 on GA.
But I'm curious if we can use something like vgritsenko's technique
On Jun 10, 2010, at 8:02 AM, Brian Jenkins wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Brian Jenkins br...@brianjenkins.org wrote:
I've learned *just* enough Erlang to hack in support for
X-HTTP-METHOD-OVERRIDE headers.
It's in the trunk and 0.11.x branches here:
Devs,
Is anyone else seeing the replicator test hang and never finish?
It never hangs the first few runs, but after running ten or so times, I'll end
up with the test suite waiting for a replication that never finishes. It's the
same story on 0.11.0, 0.11.x, and trunk.
Is anyone else able to
to hang, I can hang it just fine by running
the test alone. Firebug or not, doesn't seem to make a difference.
Cheers
Jan
--
On 10 Jun 2010, at 01:33, J Chris Anderson wrote:
Devs,
Is anyone else seeing the replicator test hang and never finish?
It never hangs the first few runs
On Jun 9, 2010, at 6:26 PM, Paul Bonser wrote:
Oh, I should also mention that I got the exact same error in multiple
freezes. Twice it was in the same exact order, and once it was in this
order:
yep. It looks like you are seeing what I'm seeing.
Now that we know I'm not crazy ... what to
Devs,
I've just committed an enhancement to Futon that makes it easy to replicate the
contents of your local test_suite_reports db to
http://couchdb.couchdb.org/test_suite_reports
When people start sharing their reports we'll find this to be a very valuable
resource. For instance, run this
the CLA I can't use any of this code :(
-Mikeal
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:45 PM, J Chris Anderson jch...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 18, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Mikeal Rogers wrote:
haha!
s/of/or/g
I actually do have this running from this zip, which I had to wait 60
seconds staring at a counter
On Jun 5, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
I've only been merging bugfixes into 0.11.x for a long time now. I think I
committed a number of things into trunk related to JIRA tickets with a Fix
Version of 1.1.
I've been reviewing the diff between trunk and 0.11.x -- I can't find
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
