Re: project website update

r changes, add the files, commit, and push. If you use Github then you may need to associate your GitHub with your Apache ID. Go to id.apache.org <http://id.apache.org/> or check your Apache details at whimsy.apache.org <http://whimsy.apache.org/> Your Github account must have 2FA s

Re: release?

> On Aug 31, 2021, at 4:12 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > > On 8/30/2021 3:53 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote: >> >> Le 30/08/2021 à 13:53, Eric Covener a écrit : >>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 7:36 AM ste...@eissing.org >>> >>> wrote: >>>

Re: svn commit: r1891407 - /httpd/site/trunk/content/docs-project/contribute.mdtext

I went ahead and made this change to GitHub.com/apache/httpd-site I also made a change to the newest pelican build method in GitHub.com/apache/infrastructure-pelican I’ll be monitoring dev@httpd.a.o <mailto:dev@httpd.a.o> for a few more days before I unsubscribe. All The Best, Dave &g

Re: svn commit: r1891407 - /httpd/site/trunk/content/docs-project/contribute.mdtext

Yes. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 9, 2021, at 1:17 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >  > >> On 7/9/21 2:39 PM, rbo...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: rbowen >> Date: Fri Jul 9 12:39:29 2021 >> New Revision: 1891407 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1891407&view=rev >> Log: >> s/freenode/l

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

> On Jul 1, 2021, at 11:40 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > > On 7/1/21 10:49 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote: >> Le 01/07/2021 à 18:37, Dave Fisher a écrit : >>> I see that there is already a PR to fix the modules hyperlink. Should this >>> be applied &

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

I see that there is already a PR to fix the modules hyperlink. Should this be applied and the ASF Pelican version of httpd.apache.org be put into production in 24 hours? HTH, Dave > On Jun 29, 2021, at 2:23 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi - > >> On Jun 29, 2021,

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 29, 2021, at 11:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >  > >> On 6/29/21 11:23 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> Hi - >> >>>> On Jun 29, 2021, at 1:17 PM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET >>>> wrote: >>> &g

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

Hi - > On Jun 29, 2021, at 1:17 PM, Marion & Christophe JAILLET > wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > Thanks for having done it. > > You did faster and better than what I had started. > > > Here are a few details spotted here and there: >- The

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

> On Jun 28, 2021, at 10:40 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > > I spot checked and it looked good to me. Thanks Dave! You’re welcome! My pleasure! > > Can anyone else review please so we can cut over and get off the naughty list? Let me know and I’ll make the changes it will tak

Re: where do we want to send website bot notices?

. pelican.notify are buildbot runs of the website. HTH, Dave > On Jun 28, 2021, at 1:35 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > > On 6/28/21 10:12 AM, Joe Orton wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 03:50:33PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >>> I was about to update the site c

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

Hi - Greg and discussed this situation further and I misinterpreted a comment. I reverted this change. Regards, Dave > On Jun 26, 2021, at 9:17 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > FYI - > > The regeneration of vulnerability reports is now a manual exercise. On review > with In

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

FYI - The regeneration of vulnerability reports is now a manual exercise. On review with Infra it was decided that running arbitrary shell scripts during a pelican build is a security risk. All the best, Dave > On Jun 25, 2021, at 10:12 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > The Migration fr

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

The Migration from CMS to ASF-Pelican is staged! https://httpd.staged.apache.org/ is ready. https://github.com/apache/httpd-site/ See the README on GitHub for details. All The Best, Dave > On Jun 22, 2021, at 11:00 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > >> On Jun 21, 2021, at 6:2

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

l template/scaffolding is needed that > we'd be able to see w/o replacing our currently published site. > I don't want anyone to start from scratch if there's a better way to > get started. I have the go ahead to do the migration for you. The goal is to create a staged site that will be nearly identical to your current site. Expect more information this week. All The Best, Dave

Re: migration of the HTTPD project website

to this. Your whole approach to the security pages will need to change. You will need to produce the html as a separate step. Also the mdtext files need to be converted to md with a manual review in order to catch the discrepancies between the CMS’s flavor of markdown and the GFM. Regards, Dave

Re: rational behind not checking the return value of apr_palloc and apr_pcalloc

> "first the attacker has to find  a way to reduce system memory to an > almost oom condition" > Say, by attacking several httpd threads and/or unrelated processes to > get them to eat up memory. > > -- > Sent from my toaster. > If you know something why not share it ;) ? imho Apache is pretty goo

Re: rational behind not checking the return value of apr_palloc and apr_pcalloc

> And if you can't illustrate a few explicit cases, further abstract arguments > are likely to be politely, but firmly, ignored.  There are good C language > forums for folks to carry on such religious arguments. > > Or to put it another way, the dev@ group here is most certainly not worried > abou

Re: rational behind not checking the return value of apr_palloc and apr_pcalloc

On 2 September 2010 13:29, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 9/1/2010 10:17 PM, dave b wrote: >> >> Why not just fix it now and not worry? ... > > It will help if you can provide a specific use case for graceful failure. > > A segfault/dereference of NULL pointer provide

Re: rational behind not checking the return value of apr_palloc and apr_pcalloc

> no, I don't want you to do anything for me; I'm just sharing my educated > guess at what it takes to make progress on this topic you're apparently very > interested in > > with a little luck you'll be able to find somebody here to analyze the code > you pointed out to see which cases actually mat

Re: rational behind not checking the return value of apr_palloc and apr_pcalloc

> > My 2 cents: > > I doubt that any of the core devs are going to match you for devotion to > this topic, but I'm sure we will review patches to trunk to fix somewhat > practical scenarios, such as ensuring that memory allocation failures during > request processing go through the common abort fun

Re: rational behind not checking the return value of apr_palloc and apr_pcalloc

On 1 September 2010 22:08, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Graham Dumpleton > wrote: >> >> On 1 September 2010 20:15, Graham Leggett wrote: >> > On 01 Sep 2010, at 6:07 AM, dave b wrote: >> > >> >> What is the

rational behind not checking the return value of apr_palloc and apr_pcalloc

What is the rational behind not checking the return value of apr_palloc and apr_pcalloc? code memory/unix/apr_pools.c from apr-1.4.2 APR_DECLARE(void *) apr_pcalloc(apr_pool_t *pool, apr_size_t size); APR_DECLARE(void *) apr_pcalloc(apr_pool_t *pool, apr_size_t size) { void *mem; if ((me

Re: WELCOME to modules-...@httpd.apache.org

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 13:21, Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:18 PM, dave wrote: > > acfg and bcfg are the arguments to the merge calback. cfg is the result > that > > the merge callback returns > > ... > > merge_server{acfg: 0x2b45d35e79d0

Re: WELCOME to modules-...@httpd.apache.org

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 13:21, Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:18 PM, dave wrote: > > acfg and bcfg are the arguments to the merge calback. cfg is the result > that > > the merge callback returns > > ... > > merge_server{acfg: 0x2b45d35e79d0

Re: WELCOME to modules-...@httpd.apache.org

create new handler{pid: 2800cfg:0x2b45dc26fff0server: 0x2b45dc2361b8} <-- recieving the return value of the merge_server create new Is this the way it is supposed to work? -dave man...@gmail.com

Re: How can i decrypt a cookie in a module

d/mod_so.html > Sorry i´m a newbie in this stuff. Everyone starts somewhere :-) Dave

Logging authentication requests

t;wrapping an existing hook"? Dave

Re: number of bytes/packets sent/received

es database. It also takes care of > connection pooling. > Ah. I'm planning to use mod_dbd myself for a project, but I wasn't aware it provided any logging ability. Dave

Re: number of bytes/packets sent/received

gt; suggests that Apache's default mod_log_config needs to be rebuilt). Dave

Re: number of bytes/packets sent/received

d. > Would mod_logio be at all helpful? http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_logio.html I haven't looked into it, but the source might give you some ideas. You may even have a direct solution if you use a module that logs directly to a database. I must admit that I don't know offhand if such a module exists. Dave

Re: APR::Request::Apache2 param() method

gi)) { $r->log->warn("Got [CGI] $k => " . $pscgi->{$k}); } ## verify that we got an alert id my $alert_id = $req->param('alerts_id'); my $alert_email = $req->param('alerts_email'); $r->log->deb

APR::Request::Apache2 param() method

en, referer: http://lalala.aboutmybaby.localhost/mailing_list/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Any suggestions on how to fix this? My platform is: [Tue Jan 30 12:33:01 2007] [notice] Apache/2.0.58 (Unix) PHP/5.1.4 DAV/2 mod_apreq2-20051231/2.6.0 mod_perl/2.0.2 Perl/v5.8.8 configured -- resuming normal operations thanks dave

Re: Problems with apreq2 on OS X

this might be a dumb question, but have you checked that the apreq module is loaded? LoadModule apreq_modulemodules/mod_apreq2.so ? dave On Oct 29, 2006, at 12:23 PM, Patrick Galbraith wrote: Fred Moyer wrote: Patrick Galbraith wrote: Fred, Ok: I have this failure on 1. OS X 2

possible bug in Apache 2.0 (sending chunked body with HTTP/1.0)

This is low priority. The only reason I'm hitting it is because I'm working with a custom Apache module that does URL-based redirection to an Application Server, and I've managed to work around it pretty easily. I doubt anyone using Apache out of the box would ever see it. When SSL is being used

Apache 2.1.0

When are we going to start seeing httpd 2.1.x releases? httpd 2.0.x releases were coming out about two years before a GA release. What is the plan for 2.1.x functionality?   Just interested! I would like to use mod_dav_lock.   Dave.

Re: stable 2.0 trees

kernel. Sorry if this pisses people off, but it's just common sense. Dave.

Re: mod_proxy and Content-Length

up to any modifying filter to be responsible for Content-Length changes. The proxy itself should, IMHO, be always be considered a non-modifying passthough (with the obvious exception of proxy-specific HTTP headers, which Content-Length is not). - Dave - Original Message - From: "

alloca() issue on tru64

suggested change to include alloca.h if HAVE_ALLOCA is set. If my assumption is wrong that alloca is a universal include file (for machines that have alloca), then this could be restricted to Tru64, or maybe another conditional in configure :-p regards, Dave Hill --- srclib/apr/poll/unix/p

Re: apachectl and options take 2

Hi again, Attached is the diff -u version of the proposes apachectl changes. If I am outvoted on the env veriable (and so far it is 2 against me :-) just drop the $HTTPD_OPTIONS from the end of the line in the few places it occurs. thanks, Dave Hill --- apachectl.in.orig 2002-08

apachectl and options take 2

r this into the tree for me ? thanks, Dave Hill *** apachectl.in.orig Thu Aug 29 11:20:36 2002 --- apachectl.inThu Aug 29 14:19:29 2002 *** *** 22,28 # When multiple arguments are given, only the error from the _last_ # one is reported. Run "apachectl

adding options to apachectl

parse & modify. If HTTPD_OPTIONS is not set, it defaults to blank which is just fine. Proposed patch follows: regards, Dave Hill *** apachectl.orig Tue Aug 27 13:58:52 2002 --- apachectl Tue Aug 27 14:02:30 2002 *** *** 54,68 case $ARGV in start|sto

Re: New "full" log format definition

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >When it comes to a "Complete" reference, stop and look at the number >of HTTP headers that might be interesting. Look at the breadth of SSL >tokens available from mod_ssl. It is reasonably incomprehensible to t

Re: Patch for PR# 4634

On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 11:57:34PM -0600, Dave Dribin wrote: > Hi, > > I've attached a patch against 1.3.23 that modifies ./configure to take > a "--force-suffix" option as a solution to PR# 4634. > > http://bugs.apache.org/index.cgi/full/4634 It's been

Re: Copyright year bumping

On Sat, Mar 09, 2002 at 12:20:23PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote: > Sander Striker wrote: > >Hi, > > > >Should we bump the copyright year on all the files? > >Anyone have a script handy? > > find . -type f -exec perl -pi -e 's|2000-2001|2000-2002|' {} \; It always seems to me that if you are going to

Patch for PR# 4634

akes symlinks to the encap directory, such as: /usr/local/etc/httpd/httpd.conf -> ../../encap/apache-1.3.23/etc/httpd/httpd.conf I'd rather keep the files in /usr/local/etc/httpd rather than /usr/local/etc. -Dave diff -uNr apache_1.3.23/configure apache_1.3.23.1/configure ---

RE: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Jan 2 23:45:06 EST 2002

Just a reminder, that I and at least one other person (Dwayne Miller [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]) have reported that we have been unable to get Apache to run as an NT service when we do our own builds. Should I add this to a bug database somewhere? - Dave -Original Message- From: Rodent of

RE: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)

Any other thoughts on this one? It's going to become important very soon that I be able to run my own build as a service. Thanks. - Dave -Original Message- From: Dave Seidel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:29 PM To: William A. Rowe, Jr.; [

RE: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)

einstalled VS6SP5, rebuilt from scratch again. Same problem. -Original Message- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 12:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18) F

RE: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)

No SSL in either. -Original Message- From: Dwayne Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18) Did you build with SSL support? Does the MSI file contain SSL support?

RE: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)

nary. FYI, I did my local build using VC 6.0, using the InstallBin target in the IDE, using all the project files as they came from the zip archive. -Original Message- From: Dave Seidel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: pr

RE: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)

This is precisely the same as what I'm seeing, the only difference being that I built from the 2.0.28 archive. -Original Message- From: Dwayne Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 3:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k serv

RE: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)

t: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18) Dave, win32 canonicalization requires list/read access to each directory above Apache directories, to the root. It doesn't have to have access to thei

RE: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)

-n Apache arg instead, if you like. Bill - Original Message ----- From: "Dave Seidel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:58 AM Subject: RE: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18) &

RE: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)

ase. > Sorry > > for the confusion. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:40 AM > > To: Apache-Dev; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: problem running 2.0.18 as Win2k servic

RE: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)

roblem running 2.0.18 as Win2k service > > > On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Dave Seidel wrote: > > > I just built a 2.0.18 binary from scratch from the zip archive, using VC6 > on > > Win2K. Works fine from the console, but it does not work as a service. > > Any ideas? Is t

RE: problem running 2.0.28 as Win2k service (was 2.0.18)

service On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Dave Seidel wrote: > I just built a 2.0.18 binary from scratch from the zip archive, using VC6 on > Win2K. Works fine from the console, but it does not work as a service. > Any ideas? Is this a tested configuration in this beta (I don't see much > about

problem running 2.0.18 as Win2k service

ideas? Is this a tested configuration in this beta (I don't see much about it in the status reports)? What else can I try to provide more data? - Dave -- Dave Seidel, Founder Mindreef, LLC