[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12847675#action_12847675
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3026:
---
you made some changes in record.java
as a result I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12847667#action_12847667
]
Sharan Foga commented on OFBIZ-3565:
Hi
The guide has been updated. I've put the text
Scott Gray wrote:
> On 19/03/2010, at 5:26 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>> On 19/03/2010, at 5:01 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>>
Scott Gray wrote:
> I've had to modify this in the past as well, so +1 from me.
Where is that code then? Why isn't it committed?
>>> All I did
On 19/03/2010, at 5:26 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> On 19/03/2010, at 5:01 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>
>>> Scott Gray wrote:
I've had to modify this in the past as well, so +1 from me.
>>> Where is that code then? Why isn't it committed?
>>
>> All I did was turn off the invent
Scott Gray wrote:
> On 19/03/2010, at 5:01 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> Scott Gray wrote:
>>> I've had to modify this in the past as well, so +1 from me.
>> Where is that code then? Why isn't it committed?
>
> All I did was turn off the inventory requirement during the condition
> checking, it wa
On 19/03/2010, at 5:01 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> I've had to modify this in the past as well, so +1 from me.
>
> Where is that code then? Why isn't it committed?
All I did was turn off the inventory requirement during the condition checking,
it was not a generic solution tha
Scott Gray wrote:
> I've had to modify this in the past as well, so +1 from me.
Where is that code then? Why isn't it committed?
> On 19/03/2010, at 4:45 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> Why does GWP require inventory? Shouldn't that be a flag on the
>> action itself? Our client wants to always giv
I am thinking that the contactList stuff should be moved from Marketing to
Party.
The only link to the marketing application seems to be the
and
in the ContactList entity.
It should be possible to use contact lists without the marketing
application, don't you thin
I've had to modify this in the past as well, so +1 from me.
Regards
Scott
On 19/03/2010, at 4:45 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> Why does GWP require inventory? Shouldn't that be a flag on the
> action itself? Our client wants to always give the gift, and have a
> backorder sub-process be initiated.
Why does GWP require inventory? Shouldn't that be a flag on the
action itself? Our client wants to always give the gift, and have a
backorder sub-process be initiated.
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:50 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> things marked with (general) are meant to apply to anyone at all,
>> anytime, working on anything. Not just those in ofbiz, not just
>> Jacopo or me.
>>
>> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>> On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Adam
On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:50 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> things marked with (general) are meant to apply to anyone at all,
> anytime, working on anything. Not just those in ofbiz, not just
> Jacopo or me.
>
> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Where is all th
WebPosUiLabels references in applications
-
Key: OFBIZ-3569
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3569
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: humanres
Affects Versions: SVN
MyPortalUiLabels references
---
Key: OFBIZ-3567
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3567
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: order
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Ad
PosUiLabels references in applications
--
Key: OFBIZ-3568
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3568
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: humanres
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
EcommerceUiLabels references in applications/*
--
Key: OFBIZ-3566
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3566
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: accounting, order, produ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12847612#action_12847612
]
Sharan Foga commented on OFBIZ-3565:
Hi Jacopo
Thanks very much for your feedback. I'l
Bob Morley wrote:
> Do you have a bug in our office? I happen to be working on this very thing
> today. A number of months ago a developer here had added this support to
> the entity model. In affect, you could union two entities together -- the
> issues we had today were around proper typing in
Do you have a bug in our office? I happen to be working on this very thing
today. A number of months ago a developer here had added this support to
the entity model. In affect, you could union two entities together -- the
issues we had today were around proper typing in the model (it needed to
Has anyone else ever wanted to do a UNION type query in ofbiz?
Currently, I'm doing a hack, where I use the entity engine sql
generation to get the different parts of the UNION query, but then I
concatenate them myself before doing a raw jdbc call.
I don't have any plans right now to actually add
things marked with (general) are meant to apply to anyone at all,
anytime, working on anything. Not just those in ofbiz, not just
Jacopo or me.
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>> Where is all this hostility coming from? I sent a simple message,
>>> sayi
On Mar 19, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>
>> Where is all this hostility coming from? I sent a simple message,
>> saying it should be split(not must).
And you were wrong.
>> You responded that it didn't
>> need to be, so I assumed that you hadn't seen any of my other emails
>> about t
Adam Heath wrote:
> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> On Mar 19, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>
>>> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Mar 19, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> jaco...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jacopoc
>> Date: Fri Mar 19 17:23:15 2010
>> New Revision: 9
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>> On Mar 19, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>>
jaco...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jacopoc
> Date: Fri Mar 19 17:23:15 2010
> New Revision: 925342
>
> URL: http:
David E Jones wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>> On Mar 19, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>>
jaco...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jacopoc
> Date: Fri Mar 19 17:23:15 2010
> New Revision: 925342
>
> URL: http://s
On Mar 19, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> On Mar 19, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>
>>> jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Fri Mar 19 17:23:15 2010
New Revision: 925342
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=925342&
On Mar 19, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> On Mar 19, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>
>>> jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Fri Mar 19 17:23:15 2010
New Revision: 925342
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=925342
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> jaco...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: jacopoc
>>> Date: Fri Mar 19 17:23:15 2010
>>> New Revision: 925342
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=925342&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Improved search capabilities of the wo
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> jaco...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: jacopoc
>>> Date: Fri Mar 19 17:23:15 2010
>>> New Revision: 925342
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=925342&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Improved search capabilities of the wo
On Mar 19, 2010, at 6:43 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> jaco...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jacopoc
>> Date: Fri Mar 19 17:23:15 2010
>> New Revision: 925342
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=925342&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Improved search capabilities of the work effort calendar screens; convert
jaco...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jacopoc
> Date: Fri Mar 19 17:23:15 2010
> New Revision: 925342
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=925342&view=rev
> Log:
> Improved search capabilities of the work effort calendar screens; converted
> ftl template to form widget.
This should have been
On Mar 19, 2010, at 6:11 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> OrderShipment is used now, because I refactored the code in that commit; it
>> was not used before that (apart from the "shipment plan" screen I mentioned,
>> but as I said I doubt companies could use it in producti
Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
> Le 19/03/2010 17:52, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
>> From: "Adam Heath"
>
>> Jacques
>>
>>
>>
> i'm more for a 140 chars length size.
This is you. Someone else will will want 80, or 121, or, like me,
157. There's no way you can pick some number, and make everyone
happy
Le 19/03/2010 17:52, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
From: "Adam Heath"
Jacques
i'm more for a 140 chars length size.
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
On 19/03/2010, at 11:05 AM, Adam Heath wrote:
> Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> From: "Adam Heath"
>>> er...@apache.org wrote:
Author: erwan
Date: Fri Mar 19 16:17:35 2010
New Revision: 925302
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=925302&view=rev
Log:
Correcting warn
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
OrderShipment is used now, because I refactored the code in that commit; it was not used
before that (apart from the "shipment plan" screen I mentioned, but as I said I
doubt companies could use it in production).
I understand. I thought you were asking why his impor
Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> From: "Adam Heath"
>> er...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: erwan
>>> Date: Fri Mar 19 16:17:35 2010
>>> New Revision: 925302
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=925302&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Correcting warning message on too long foreign keys
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>
From: "Adam Heath"
er...@apache.org wrote:
Author: erwan
Date: Fri Mar 19 16:17:35 2010
New Revision: 925302
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=925302&view=rev
Log:
Correcting warning message on too long foreign keys
Modified:
ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/model/Mo
Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
> Le 19/03/2010 17:28, Adam Heath a écrit :
>
>>
>> Hmm. What is the standard for overly long lines? All on one, or
>> wrapped? The code base is not consistent in this manner.
>>
>> My opinion, is that when wrapping, it enforces a maximum size, that in
>> all likely ho
Le 19/03/2010 17:28, Adam Heath a écrit :
Hmm. What is the standard for overly long lines? All on one, or
wrapped? The code base is not consistent in this manner.
My opinion, is that when wrapping, it enforces a maximum size, that in
all likely hood is less than what we developers actually
er...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: erwan
> Date: Fri Mar 19 16:17:35 2010
> New Revision: 925302
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=925302&view=rev
> Log:
> Correcting warning message on too long foreign keys
>
> Modified:
>
> ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/model/Mod
+1
On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 09:16 -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> First, if you haven't, read this discussion on the OpenTaps forums about
> OFBiz:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/opentaps/forums/forum/487771/topic/3562735
>
> Leaving aside whether OpenTaps should continue to be based on OFBiz
+1. Still an effort to complete the layered lookups, hopefully mostly regexp
and C/P...
Jacques
From: "Ean Schuessler"
First, if you haven't, read this discussion on the OpenTaps forums about OFBiz:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/opentaps/forums/forum/487771/topic/3562735
Leaving aside whe
Thank you Ruth,
never mind.
-Bruno
2010/3/19 Ruth Hoffman
> Hi Bruno:
> I'd be happy to share everything I've done so far:
>
> I wrote my own UI that unifies all my business applications such as
> this. (I have a really hard time going back and forth between all
> the many OFBiz webapps.)
+1
Ean Schuessler wrote:
First, if you haven't, read this discussion on the OpenTaps forums about OFBiz:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/opentaps/forums/forum/487771/topic/3562735
Leaving aside whether OpenTaps should continue to be based on OFBiz, one of the major undercurrents of the disucs
Le 19/03/2010 16:16, Ean Schuessler a écrit :
First, if you haven't, read this discussion on the OpenTaps forums about OFBiz:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/opentaps/forums/forum/487771/topic/3562735
Leaving aside whether OpenTaps should continue to be based on OFBiz, one of the
major undercu
+1
2010/3/19 Ean Schuessler
> First, if you haven't, read this discussion on the OpenTaps forums about
> OFBiz:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/opentaps/forums/forum/487771/topic/3562735
>
> Leaving aside whether OpenTaps should continue to be based on OFBiz, one of
> the major undercurrents
+1 and a shout out Ean! The work you guys have done in conjunction with the
rest of the community definitely is worthy of making a big deal about.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 19, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Mike Bates wrote:
> +1
> --
> Mike Bates
> HotWax Media
> CEO
> http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
> cell: 801
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12847401#action_12847401
]
Adam Heath commented on OFBIZ-2208:
---
The reason why it can't be time based, is that is ho
+1
--
Mike Bates
HotWax Media
CEO
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
cell: 801.706.9137
desk: 801.649.6245
main: 888.405.2667
ApacheCon US 2009 Gold Sponsor
http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2009/sponsors/sponsors
On Mar 19, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> First, if you haven't, read this discussio
First, if you haven't, read this discussion on the OpenTaps forums about OFBiz:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/opentaps/forums/forum/487771/topic/3562735
Leaving aside whether OpenTaps should continue to be based on OFBiz, one of the
major undercurrents of the disucssion is that OFBiz has use
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2010, at 9:57 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>>> Hi Ean,
>>>
>>> On Mar 18, 2010, at 7:05 PM, Ean Schuessler wrote:
>>>
Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> What I find interesting is that your OrderShipment entity was not empty.
>
Hi Bruno:
I'd be happy to share everything I've done so far:
I wrote my own UI that unifies all my business applications such as
this. (I have a really hard time going back and forth between all
the many OFBiz webapps.)
My UI coding standards are not of the OFBiz "way". I don't use a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12847372#action_12847372
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3565:
Jacopo,
I have also followed your recomme
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12847340#action_12847340
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-3565:
--
Hi Sharan,
I have downloaded the PDF
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato resolved OFBIZ-3349.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hi Sam,
this is the correct behavior because that fixed asset is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-3349.
> Fixed Asset Depreciation Report For Demo Machine Group Error
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato reassigned OFBIZ-3349:
Assignee: Jacopo Cappellato
> Fixed Asset Depreciation Report For Demo Machine Grou
Thank you All for your suggestions.
Ruth,
what you describes is the closest to what I had in mind to build.
Is there any way to share the code?
In any case I think I will submit the code I will write for this since it
seems an enough general feature.
-Bruno
2010/3/18 Ruth Hoffman
> Hi Bruno:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12847274#action_12847274
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-2208:
Hi Adam,
Have you a suggestion? Maybe we
Hi commiters,
For those who may have not noticed this message. Note: you can keep the same
password on LDAP
Thanks to Ashish for the suggestion of forwarding
Jacques
From: "Tony Stevenson"
On 18/02/2010 19:02, Tony Stevenson wrote:
Folks,
On March 19th we will be changing the source of au
On Mar 18, 2010, at 10:01 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>> On Mar 18, 2010, at 6:37 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
>>
It may be that your change isn't really needed. But I will admit I
don't have a complete knowledge of everything.
>>> OrderItemShipGroupAssoc?
>>
>> Is it a
62 matches
Mail list logo
