Duplicated label OrderAllowSplit

2008-11-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, I would like to remove the label OrderAllowSplit from EcommerceUiLabels.xml and use the shared one from OrderUiLabels.xml but it has been translated in different way in those two files. Can anyone interested in their language to indicate to me which is the correct one ? Thanks in ad

Re: Content links are broken in latest SVN.

2008-10-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
since those links (when reverted) are leaving to nearly nowhere but a search content page. Alternatives : * Get the links back, but then they maybe need more work ? * Remove all the content box ? Maybe Marco has an idea ? Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Th

Statuses of issues on JIRA

2008-10-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, while I'm checking some issues on JIRA I have seen from the on-line help that it can be possible to add some more statuses to tracks in details the actual status of an issue. I didn't know if this argument was already discussed but probably it can help the committers to see which

Error on ecommerce using one page checkout

2008-10-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, I have tried now with last revision of trunk the ecommerce one page checkout and it gives to me the following error: org.ofbiz.widget.screen.ScreenRenderException: Error rendering screen [component://ecommerce/widget/OrderScreens.xml#OnePageCheckout]: groovy.lang.MissingPropert

Re: Discussion: Home application (was: Pluggable preferences/profile screen)

2008-10-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t (in fact, the calendar work I'm doing right now is part of that) but we need a place for it to land. -Adrian --- On Sun, 10/5/08, Bruno Busco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Bruno Busco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Discussion: Home application (was: Pluggable preferences/pr

saveProductPriceChange review of operation

2008-10-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
seems to me if a price gets changed that the saveProductPriceChange should put a Thru Date for that price in the Product price for the price that got changed. Now the price stays in the ProdcutPrice so you many have many prices of one type after many price changes.

Re: Cleaning of accounting artifacts

2008-10-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
me know if you need examples (but I guess it's obvious) Jacques From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Yes, I have declared those old request/view as "TO BE REMOVED". Thanks Marco Il giorno 05/ott/08, alle ore 14:07, Jacques Le Roux ha scritto: Hi Marco, From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g

Re: Cleaning of accounting artifacts

2008-10-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, I have declared those old request/view as "TO BE REMOVED". Thanks Marco Il giorno 05/ott/08, alle ore 14:07, Jacques Le Roux ha scritto: Hi Marco, From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi to all, looking into artifact info logs I discover some requests that refers some views

Cleaning of accounting artifacts

2008-10-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, looking into artifact info logs I discover some requests that refers some views that are no more existing. Someone of you knows if I can remove the following requests ? ListFixedAssetParties EditFixedAssetParties addPartyToFixedAsset updatePartyToFixedAsset removePartyFromFixedAsse

Re: Improvements and bug fixing on web pos component

2008-10-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Jacques and Ray for your comments. I have created now a new improvement on JIRA about the first point. Marco Il giorno 03/ott/08, alle ore 14:22, Jacques Le Roux ha scritto: Ray, Bruno, Like Ray, just a 1st approach, my comments inline... From: "Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: ServiceDispatcher throws, but only when running from Eclipse

2008-10-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not sure, I don't use Eclipse. I use log* in the code and read the log files Scott Gray wrote: I've always used remote debugging and it's problem free. Out of curiosity, why do people run OFBiz in eclipse? What are the benefits? Regards Scott 2008/10/3 Sven Wesley &l

Re: ServiceDispatcher throws, but only when running from Eclipse

2008-10-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/10/3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> did a google on running ofbiz in eclipse http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Running+and+Debugging+OFBiz+in+Eclipse Note: you should not mix 4.0 and trunk have different projects. Sven Wesley wrote: Hi all, I recently checked out the trunk

Re: ServiceDispatcher throws, but only when running from Eclipse

2008-10-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
did a google on running ofbiz in eclipse http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Running+and+Debugging+OFBiz+in+Eclipse Note: you should not mix 4.0 and trunk have different projects. Sven Wesley wrote: Hi all, I recently checked out the trunk (have been working with 4.0 until now). Everything wor

Re: WorkEffort.TimeTransparency

2008-10-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know in scheduling it is if the time is free or committed. like a task may not take any time but does have a place in the events of doing something. Maybe a tickler to check something. Adrian Crum wrote: The TimeTransparency field in the WorkEffort entity appears to be unused. I believe the

Improvements and bug fixing on web pos component

2008-10-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, I would like to share with you the new improvements and bug fixing on the new web pos component that I have in my mind: - On PosTerminal entity add a new "terminalName" field. It can be used in the new web pos login form to see the pos terminal name instead of the posTerminalId. -

Main New features in OFBiz updated

2008-09-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, I have updated the "Main New Features in OFBiz" document in confluence from May to September 2008. It's not so perfect but it's better than have it empty. Anyone interested can update/remove the messages wrong. Thanks Marco

Re: Replace deprecated methods and constructors of entity delegator classes

2008-09-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rk in the meantime to replace all the findByAnd and findByPrimaryKey to the new methods. Thanks Marco 2008/9/25 [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Inizio messaggio inoltrato: *Da: *David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *Data: *25 settembre 2008 18:36:24 GMT+02:00 *A: [EMAIL PR

Replace deprecated methods and constructors of entity delegator classes

2008-09-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, I have created a document in confluence (http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/Replace+deprecated+methods+and+constructors+of+entity+delegator+classes) about replace all the deprecated methods and constructors of entity delegator. I would like to start working on this conversions. Is

A new web pos application

2008-09-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is the first alpha version of the new web pos application. I have converted some of the actual services of pos application with a web user interface. I would like to get some feedbacks on it. You can find it on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1965. Thanks Marco

Re: Call the method setItemShipGroupQty of ShoppingCart class from a simple me thod

2008-07-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt; > > > > property="AccountingExpEndOfLifeIsEmpty"/> > > > > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > > Mridul Pathak > HotWax Media, Inc. > http://www.hotwaxmedia.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > On Jul 31

Call the method setItemShipGroupQty of ShoppingCart class from a simple method

2008-07-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, I'm trying to call from a simple method the method setItemShipGroupQty() of ShoppingCart but actually it accepts only some parameters with native type double and int and so it gives to me an error from the simple method. I have tried to add this method and now everything is ok.

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1783) Junit test case for Purchase Invoices: editing, adding taxes and shipping charges and posting to GL...

2008-06-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12606987#action_12606987 ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] commented on OFBIZ-1783: - Hi We are try to crea

survey request

2008-06-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-berlin.de/pepper/survey/ Thank You!!! Contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/survey-request-tp18010511p18010511.html Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: svn commit: r668804 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/src/org/ofbiz: product/catalog/ product/category/ product/config/ product/feature/ product/inventory/ product/price/ product/product/ pro

2008-06-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
008, at 8:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Jacopo, I'm trying to start to document the java packages of OFBiz (visible in http://api.ofbiz.org) and until now I know that there was only this way to document the packages. I also prefer your new suggestion to document it with a c

Re: svn commit: r668804 - in /ofbiz/tru nk/applications/product/src/org/ofbiz: product/catalog/ product/category/ prod uct/config/ product/feature/ product/in ventory/ product/price/ product/product

2008-06-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> much about the idea of having a bunch of package-info.java classes > > around. I'm wondering if it was possible for the software architects > > at Sun to design a cleaner solution for documenting Java packages :) > > > > Jacopo > > > > > > On J

Re: svn commit: r668804 - in /ofbiz/tru nk/applications/product/src/org/ofbiz: product/catalog/ product/category/ prod uct/config/ product/feature/ product/in ventory/ product/price/ product/product

2008-06-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d > >> a lot of html files to our src folders. > >> I'd suggest to pause and think and discuss a bit more about this > >> before going on. > >> What do you think? > >> > >> Jacopo > >> > >> > >> On Jun 17, 2008,

Re: svn commit: r668804 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/src/org/ofbiz: product/catalog/ product/category/ product/config/ product/feature/ product/inventory/ product/price/ product/product/ pro

2008-06-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It will appear like this if you insert the package.html on every single java package. Il giorno 17/giu/08, alle ore 23:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: These files package.html are standard file into the source folder making working javadocs correctly the documents about packages

Re: svn commit: r668804 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/src/org/ofbiz: product/catalog/ product/category/ product/config/ product/feature/ product/inventory/ product/price/ product/product/ pro

2008-06-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:// api.ofbiz.org the descriptions of java packages. Thanks Marco Il giorno 17/giu/08, alle ore 21:48, Adrian Crum ha scritto: Why are javadocs being committed to the trunk? -Adrian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: mrisaliti Date: Tue Jun 17 12:25:17 2008 New Revision: 668804 URL: http

Re:June 2008 Board Report - Please Review and Comment

2008-06-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 Marco > > I have drafted a brief board report for this month to try to highlight > the main things going on in OFBiz. The draft is available here: > > http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/ASF+Board+Report+2008-06+DRAFT > > I apologize for the short advance notice on this, and I'll need to >

Remove some bsh scripts into content application

2008-06-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, while I'm converting some content bsh script to groovy I have seen that there are some bsh scripts into the following folder: applications\content\src\org\ofbiz\content clearCurrentContent.bsh (empty only ASF header) clearCurrentDataResource.bsh (empty only ASF header) lruadd.bsh lru

Re: svn commit: r662852 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/lib: commons-dbcp-1.3-20071125.225953-2.jar commons-dbcp-20070730.jar

2008-06-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, Can someone update LICENCE/Libraries Included in OFBiz/.classpath files because I'm not authorized to do it. Thanks Marco Il giorno 03/giu/08, alle ore 20:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Author: jaz Date: Tue Jun 3 11:09:56 2008 New Revision: 662852 URL:

Re: svn commit: r662852 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/lib: commons-dbcp-1.3-20071125.225953-2.jar commons-dbcp-20070730.jar

2008-06-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, Can someone update LICENCE/Libraries Included in OFBiz/.classpath files because I'm not authorized to do it. Thanks Marco Il giorno 03/giu/08, alle ore 20:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha scritto: Author: jaz Date: Tue Jun 3 11:09:56 2008 New Revision: 662852 URL:

Re: [VOTE] Move from Beanshell to Groovy

2008-05-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 > +1 > > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:07 AM, Nicolas Malin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On May 21, 2008, at 1:08 AM, David E Jones wrote: > > > > > >> This is a vote based on the recent discussion thread for changing th

About issue: Clean up labels between or der and ecommerce application (OFBIZ-17 80)

2008-05-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, I put the attention on this issue at OFBiz community level to take a decision on how we can proceed on it. Before I start to clean the labels between Order and Ecommerce application there was a lot of confusion done in the past after the conversion from property languages files to x

Re: Shared labels between Order and Ecommerce applications

2008-04-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ook on Jira > issue. Of course any reviews of Bruno's work in the meantime is welcome. > > Sorry to call upon your patience > > Jacques > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Bruno, Marco, > > > > I'm currently working

Re: Shared labels between Order and Ecommerce applications

2008-04-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Bruno, also I will take a look at this issue if I get the time. Marco Marco, there is an ongoing work on this issue. Please read https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1698 Jacques is supposed to integrate my contribution in these days. -Bruno 2008/4/21, [EMAIL PROTECTED

Shared labels between Order and Ecommerce applications

2008-04-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to All, I'm trying to translate some labels to Italian but I have seen a little bit of confusion on the shared labels between Order and Ecommerce applications. For example the label EcommerceAddtoCart (Add to Cart) is present on both files: in OrderUiLabels.xml In den Warenkorb legen

Re: how to run multiple instance of ofbiz on server

2008-04-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hnical Setup Guide on wiki to > see the list of ports. > > Raj > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I need to run two instances of ofbiz on server. Is it possible? >> If the answer is yes, then please anyone can guide how to achieve this? >> I will be very thankful. >> >> Ajay >> >

how to run multiple instance of ofbiz on server

2008-04-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all, I need to run two instances of ofbiz on server. Is it possible? If the answer is yes, then please anyone can guide how to achieve this? I will be very thankful. Ajay

Board Report Draft for March 2008

2008-03-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 Marco Risaliti - Hello all, I've finished writing up the board report draft, here: http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/ASF+Board+Report+2008-03+DRAFT Any comments and suggestions are appreciated. An informal vote (+/-1 sort of thing) is also welcome. On a side note: the crypto

Re: Re: svn commit: r631330 - in /ofbiz /trunk/applications/order/webapp/orderm gr: WEB-INF/actions/quote/ManageQuotePr ices.bsh WEB-INF/actions/quote/ViewQuot eProfit.bsh quote/ViewQuoteItemInfo.ftl

2008-02-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dAmount = 1.0; } I have fix the issue on the ViewQuoteItemInfo.ftl into rev. 631668. Thanks a lot to review it. Marco [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Author: mrisaliti Date: Tue Feb 26 10:45:08 2008 New Revision: 631330 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=631330&view=rev Log: Quote I

Order Items are no more visible on order view screen

2008-02-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, I have seen now that is no more visible on the order view screen the order items. You can see this example : https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/ordermgr/control/orderview?orderId=WSCO1 I didn't know actually if it's a problem with my browser and I have not the time to look at it now.

Re:svn commit: r619785 - /ofbiz/trunk/f ramework/common/config/CommonUiLabels.x ml

2008-02-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks a lot Hans to reapplied those labels so I cannot inserted it again in the new xml file. In the same patch I have also some translation into WebtoolsUiLabels could you please also include those when you will convert. Many thanks again Marco > Author: hansbak > Date: Thu Feb 7 22:58:16 20

Re:svn commit: r619312 [1/2] - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common/config/

2008-02-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Hans, if it's possible I don't want to lose my last translations inside the patch for the issue OFBIZ-1619 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1619). In this patch I have inserted also some new CommonUiLabels. Is it possible for you include those labels into the new CommonUiLabels.xml

Re:svn commit: r619312 [1/2] - /ofbiz/trunk/framework/common/config/

2008-02-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Hans, if it's possible I don't want to lose my last translations inside the patch for the issue OFBIZ-1619 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1619). In this patch I have inserted also some new CommonUiLabels. Is it possible for you include those labels into the new CommonUiLabels.xml

Re: VAT vs Sales Tax again and again

2008-02-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I did not remember wrongly in Italy a company has to collect all the Sales Tax and Purchase Tax and pay to the government the difference between those two amounts. In my opinion the VAT tax has to be calculated and shown (with tax included or excluded) at Order Item level because is it possib

Re: RFC: UI Refactor Part 2

2008-02-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eet won't have an adverse impact on the local style. -Adrian Jacques Le Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, I agree. I was confused by Marco's suggestion too. I mean, I can't see what is the point in replacing all the tag by class="label">. This because

Re: RFC: UI Refactor Part 2

2008-02-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Adrian, I agree with you on all these points, probably we can also replace all the tag with . In any case there still some deprecated style to be removed from the forms in the back end application and still some application to be converted to the new styles (like order entry, ecommerce, spe

Re:svn commit: r616709 - in /ofbiz/trun k/specialpurpose/pos: screens/default/m enu/posmain.xml src/org/ofbiz/pos/compo nent/Journal.java src/org/ofbiz/pos/eve nt/TestEvents.java

2008-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jacques, I have committed in rev. 616746 the new class NumericKeypad.java that was not commit. Could you please take a look if it's ok because I have only added it to permit to build OFBiz. Thanks Marco

Remove ContactListTabBar.ftl in marketing/contact

2008-01-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, I have seen that in application/webapp/marketing/contact there is a copy of the Contact Tab Bar (ContactListTabBar.ftl). The file that now is in use by OFBiz is ContactListMenu.xml so can I remove the old file ContactListTabBar.ftl that makes only confusion. Thanks Marco

(OFBIZ-1545) New Styles For Order application

2008-01-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bilgin, I made those corrections into trunk rev. 614003. Thanks a lot for the bug report. Marco Marco, Here are some trivial issues i noticed (Fedora/1.5.0.12-7.fc6 Firefox/1.5.0.12): 1.Order ->Request->Request Items -> After i choose a request Items, there is an error in the console

Re:svn commit: r610877 - /ofbiz/trunk/a pplications/product/webapp/catalog/prod uct/ProductTabBar.ftl

2008-01-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, I have committed in rev.611579 a different version of the ProductTabBar.ftl that can solved this problem. I have tried it into Firefox and Safari on Mac Os X and seems to me it's working. Please let me know if you see some more issues. Thanks Marco -- Author: jleroux Date: Thu

Re: svn commit: r610161 - in /ofbiz/tru nk/applications/order: config/ webapp/o rdermgr/requirement/ widget/ordermgr/

2008-01-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anks > Marco > > > It seems that this message never reached the ML > > > > Jacques > > > > - Original Message ----- > > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 10:54 PM > > Su

Re: svn commit: r610161 - in /ofbiz/tru nk/applications/order: config/ webapp/o rdermgr/requirement/ widget/ordermgr/

2008-01-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, Jacques also I like your suggestion but I cannot promise when I can do it because I little busy with others. Thanks Marco > It seems that this message never reached the ML > > Jacques > > - Original Message - > From: "Jacques Le Roux" <[EMAIL PRO

Lookup Shipment in Facility application

2008-01-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, during the migration to the new styles of the lookup screens into facility application I have seen that there is a Lookup Shipment screen into the LookupScreen.xml but there is any request into controller.xml. May I can add the request into the controller.xml or remove the screen from

Re: Overflow auto on "screenlet-body" into main.css

2008-01-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r the particular element, then apply that style to the element. Small "fixup" styles like that can be used inline - see the Webtools main.ftl file for an example. Or for screen widgets, you can create a component-specific style sheet - see the Party Manager partymgr.css file. -Adri

Re: Overflow auto on "screenlet-body" into main.css

2008-01-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
component-specific style sheet - see the Party Manager partymgr.css file. -Adrian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about insert into main.css for the property screenlet-body the overflow auto, so in this case we will have the horizontal scrolling in case the content inside a screenlet-body overflo

Overflow auto on "screenlet-body" into main.css

2008-01-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What about insert into main.css for the property screenlet-body the overflow auto, so in this case we will have the horizontal scrolling in case the content inside a screenlet-body overflow horizontally the screen. For example into the Store-> Shipping Estimated the table goes outside the screen

Re: Input type="text" on IE6

2008-01-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
was that OFBiz back office applications would > support the latest > standards-compliant browsers, and not worry so much about support for older > browsers. If the screens > render properly with Firefox 2 and IE 7, then we're in good shape. > > -Adrian > > [EMAIL PROT

Input type="text" on IE6

2008-01-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have done some tests on Internet Explorer 6 with OFBiz and I have seen that there are a lot of css property are not correclty interpreted by IE. For example if you have a form with an input type="text" then IE6 does not consider general rules like this: input[type="text"] { background-color: #

Proposal of guidelines for the creation of Jira issues

2007-12-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 I'm agree with you. Marco -- I would like to discuss with you some guidelines for Jira issue creation. The idea is to limit the noise in Jira and prevent the creation of Jira issues with low informative value that will stay open forever. Here are some ideas: 1) If you already have a pa

New Styles For Catalog application

2007-12-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, I have changed all the tabs of catalog details and now the ftl and widgets screen have the same look and feel. Please let me some feedback and if it's the right direction because I would like to continue on the others forms of catalog. Thanks in advance Marco

INCORPORATING ISSUE

2007-12-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have move the last 6 issues that still have the component INCORPORATING ISSUE to a different component and so it can be removed by an OFBiz JIRA administrator. Thanks Marco

Re: INCORPORATED ISSUE

2007-12-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ/component/12312085 > > for those interested. > > > > I guess how to use it is a matter of common sense. > > > > Thanks > > > > Jacques > > > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Hi Jac

Re: INCORPORATED ISSUE

2007-12-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
we will see if another way is possible... Thanks Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> So the INCORPORATED ISSUE is taged on all the sub or related tasks? on related task how do you determine which one should be INCORPORATED ISSUE. Like to help were I can on the ones I

Re: INCORPORATED ISSUE

2007-12-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ause someone is already working on them. -Adrian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, Adrian I move the discussion on dev mailing list. I'm sorry but was not my intention to made confusion on JIRA issues but instead remove confusion from JIRA issues. So I tried to start reorganization of JIRA iss

INCORPORATED ISSUE

2007-12-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, Adrian I move the discussion on dev mailing list. I'm sorry but was not my intention to made confusion on JIRA issues but instead remove confusion from JIRA issues. So I tried to start reorganization of JIRA issues on the following points: 1) assign to all the issues one or more components t

Re: Dojo vs. Prototype vs. whatever

2007-12-20 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
interesting ajax framework https://ajax.dev.java.net/ (license: http://developers.sun.com/berkeley_license.html , overview: https://ajax.dev.java.net/about.html )

Re:svn commit: r605606 - /ofbiz/trunk/.classpath

2007-12-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks a lot Jacques Marco - Author: jleroux Date: Wed Dec 19 08:28:30 2007 New Revision: 605606 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=605606&view=rev Log: Classes JasperReportsJXlsViewHandler.java JasperReportsPoiXlsViewHandler.java were missing, at Marco Risaliti demand, tha

Re: svn commit: r604986 - /ofbiz/trunk/ applications/accounting/config/payment. properties

2007-12-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
== > >> --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/payment.properties > >> (original) > >> +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/payment.properties Mon Dec > >> 17 12:31:47 2007 > >>

Re:svn commit: r604986 - /ofbiz/trunk/a pplications/accounting/config/payment.p roperties

2007-12-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
properties?rev=604986&r1=604985&r2=604986&view=diff > == > --- ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/payment.properties (original) > +++ ofbiz/trunk/applications/accounting/config/payment.properties Mon Dec 17 > 12:3

Re: adopting commented examples in config files

2007-12-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Thanks > > Jacques > > De : "BJ Freeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I will create a general JIra for a config information > > I don't have commit privileges. > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following on 12/17/2007 7:16 AM:

Re: svn commit: r604311 - in /ofbiz/bra nches/release4.0/applications/accountin g: config/payment.properties src/org/of biz/accounting/thirdparty/paypal/PayPal Events.java

2007-12-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
warn about the need to complete the configuration. Jacopo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So which url I have to use ? http://www.ofbiz.org:8080/ecommerce also if it's a broken link and there are any demo OFBiz available on this url ? Thanks Marco - I agree with this. If a configuration is mi

Re: svn commit: r604311 - in /ofbiz/br anches/release4.0/applications/accounti ng: config/payment.properties src/org/o fbiz/accounting/thirdparty/paypal/PayPa lEvents.java

2007-12-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w an error. Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 12/15/2007 3:45 PM: Yes I asked myself the same question. I gived up thinking that after all so far it's the official demo server... Jacques De : "BJ Freeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is this correct to use the demo for a return

Re: svn commit: r604311 - in /ofbiz/bra nches/release4.0/applications/accountin g: config/payment.properties src/org/of biz/accounting/thirdparty/paypal/PayPal Events.java

2007-12-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d the paypal merchant on the server. Thanks Marco -- is this correct to use the demo for a return address. should it not be just localhost till the person configures it? Should not the gateways be in a sandbox configurations? [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following on 12/14/2007 1:57 PM: A

[VOTE] Board Report 2007-12

2007-12-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Very good !! +1 Marco I have added some details and such to the board report for this month. The latest draft is here: http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/ASF+Board+Report+2007-12 Please vote (voting isn't required on these but we like people to be involved and aware), and/or comm

OFBiz JIRA issue changes

2007-12-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, I have assigned to all the issues that has not unknown component one real-one. Probably there are still some compoment that doesn't correct for some task but it's better than unknown. I made those changes to understand where I can help to review patches. I have seen that some new appli

Re: New Features Roadmap - Draft

2007-12-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
when you have order items with order adjustment calculated (VAT tax) they are shown without problems, but in any case we will see. Thanks Marco > Hi Marco, > > De : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi Jacques, > > > > I cannot put a comment into the document New Feat

Re: XUI on OFBiz main page

2007-11-30 Thread &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From http://www.xoetrope.com/partners/list: http://www.ofbiz.org The Open For Business Project is an open source enterprise automation software project licensed under the MIT Open Source License. Is licence and web page correct? ya Jacques Le Roux  wrote / napísal(a): Hi guys, For some

Re: New Features Roadmap - Draft

2007-11-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e some time till > Christmas and I have some ideas (pragmatic ones) > > Jacques > > De : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi to all, > > > > I would like to change the document of New Features Roadmap - Draft but I > > don't know I'm not able t

New Features Roadmap - Draft

2007-11-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi to all, I would like to change the document of New Features Roadmap - Draft but I don't know I'm not able to do it with my profile. Is it possible to put a link into those steps : Enhance the integration with Google Product https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1372 Enhance the integr

RE: Billing Accounts

2007-11-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(s). Skip -Original Message- From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 2:03 PM To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: Billing Accounts A Payment applied to a BillingAccount does not mean the payment is closed, in fact I'm not even sure what it me

RE: JFreeChart

2007-11-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
G. Auvil" must not be used to endorse or promote products derived from this Software without prior written permission of Nathaniel G. Auvil. For written permission, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4. Products derived from this Software may not be called "jCharts" nor may "jC

RE: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta

2007-11-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nice find BJ. -Original Message- From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 11:32 AM To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta before I put my two cents in I have searching the Internet and reading

RE: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta

2007-11-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
different inventory types. For that reason, I like it. Skip -Original Message- From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2007 1:00 AM To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta David, after reviewing the

RE: Billing Accounts

2007-11-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yment to a billing account. If there are no invoices to apply to, the Payment should stay open. It makes everything else then so easy. Skip -Original Message- From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 11:45 PM To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: R

Billing Accounts

2007-11-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just ran across this in the Wiki from David concerning Billing Accounts from back in July. http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Billing+Account The current Ofbiz implementation does not operate as described in this document. The "addon" I partially provided here: https://issues.apache.org/jira

RE: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta

2007-11-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would say that the error journal should be a match of the AcctgTrans/AcctgTransEntry set so that when the errors were corrected, they could be easily moved. Skip -Original Message- From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 12:09 PM To: dev

RE: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta

2007-11-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
they don't want or do want GL accounting done. Skip -Original Message- From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 9:19 AM To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

RE: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta

2007-11-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am thinking about the implementation of this. As I mentioned, I am strongly motivated to make each entry in AcctgTrans/AcctgTransEntry an atomic part of the underlying reason for the enter, say an Invoice creation. If the AcctgTrans/AcctgTransEntry creation fails, the Invoice creation should be

RE: JFreeChart

2007-11-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmmm Well, I somehow missed that in the licensing. This stuff is so confusing. My brain gets numb halfway through and I end of just glancing at most of it. So, has anyone any experience with an Apache style licensed charting software they would like to recommend? Skip

RE: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta

2007-11-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message- From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2007 4:20 AM To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta It sounds here like you are confusing a transaction (AcctgTrans) with a journal

JFreeChart

2007-11-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is the feeling of the developers here about using JFreeChart: http://www.jfree.org/jfreechart/ Here is the GNU Lesser General Public Licence license: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html that it utilizes. I am writing the screens for an AR collections tool and want to present the last 6

RE: svn commit: r597479 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml

2007-11-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 7:58 PM To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r597479 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml > I still maintain that there is no such thing as too much documentation > (unless it&#x

RE: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta

2007-11-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ting (leaving aside some of the really nifty things you can do for large, multi-departmental organizations). Given your superior experience here (mine is many years old), I am betting we are disagreeing over semantic issues. Skip -Original Message- From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: svn commit: r597479 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml

2007-11-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ouldn't get any work done. Such a shame too because these excellent UI designers are typically poor programmers. Skip -Original Message- From: Jonathon -- Improov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 3:40 AM To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r5974

RE: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta

2007-11-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
exception of supportingDocumentId. Skip -Original Message- From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 2:40 AM To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta David, all, I'm really interested in kno

RE: svn commit: r597479 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml

2007-11-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message- From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 11:47 PM To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r597479 - /ofbiz/trunk/applications/party/entitydef/entitymodel.xml I hope I don't burst any bubbles... but this specific paragraph

RE: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta

2007-11-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message- From: David E Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 11:31 PM To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta On Nov 23, 2007, at 12:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have some str

RE: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta

2007-11-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nes. Skip -Original Message- From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 10:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: Re: [OFBiz] Users - Accounting Extension (GL, etc) Now In Beta Hi Jim, (and others interested in helping with the impleme

  1   2   >