This is the third vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.15", the 15th
release from the release18.12 branch.
The release files can be downloaded from here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/
and are:
* apache-ofbiz-18.12.15.zip
* KEYS: text file with keys
*
Let's cancel this vote. I am going to prepare new release files shortly in
order to include the latest commits.
Thanks,
Jacopo
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:52 AM Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the second vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.15", the 15th
-1
I'm revoking my former vote, see security mailing list discussions.
Best regards,
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 14.07.24 um 18:06 schrieb Michael Brohl:
+1
Verification on Mac OS 14.3.1 with JDK 11 works.
Best regards,
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Fortunately we are able to fix these issues by reverting OFBIZ-13117 commits.
I tried locally on trunk. Without surprises it works as expected
Thanks Christian, I forgot your 1st June report :/
Le 15/07/2024 à 14:14, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
And of course locally for 18.12.015 on Ubuntu 20.04
And of course locally for 18.12.015 on Ubuntu 20.04 with JDK 8
Le 15/07/2024 à 14:09, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
BTW, logically the same exists in trunk
Le 15/07/2024 à 14:03, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Christian,
You are right, and not only that I also get this one on stable demo with
BTW, logically the same exists in trunk
Le 15/07/2024 à 14:03, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Christian,
You are right, and not only that I also get this one on stable demo with
ordermgr/control/updateCheckoutOptions/quickcheckout
org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException:
Unknown
Hi Christian,
You are right, and not only that I also get this one on stable demo with
ordermgr/control/updateCheckoutOptions/quickcheckout
org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException:
Unknown request [updateCheckoutOptions]; this request does not exist or cannot
be called
Hi,
looks like there is still the problem with order entry.
I just had a quick test... "./gradlew cleanAll loadAll", Order Entry
with "DemoCustomer", 1x GZ-1000 .. Order is created, but when clicking
on "Approve Order" I get a
"org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException: Unknown
+1
Verification on Mac OS 14.3.1 with JDK 11 works.
Best regards,
Michael Brohl
ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de
Am 11.07.24 um 10:52 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
This is the second vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.15", the 15th
release from the release18.12 branch.
The release files
+1
On Sat, Jul 13, 2024 at 3:00 PM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> Thanks Jacopo,
>
> verify-ofbiz-release.sh, back and front ends work for me me
>
> +1
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 11/07/2024 à 10:52, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
> > This is the second vote thread to publish
Thanks Jacopo,
verify-ofbiz-release.sh, back and front ends work for me me
+1
Jacques
Le 11/07/2024 à 10:52, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
This is the second vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.15", the 15th
release from the release18.12 branch.
The release files can be downloaded from
Hi,
With https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/commit/231650e1b6 I fixed few errors that would not happen if we were using @CompileStatic in Groovy
files as mentioned at
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57982247/groovy-compiler-and-non-existing-call-method
I vaguely remember having
This is the second vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.15", the 15th
release from the release18.12 branch.
The release files can be downloaded from here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/
and are:
* apache-ofbiz-18.12.15.zip
* KEYS: text file with keys
*
Let's cancel this vote! I am going to prepare new release files to include
the latest fixes and start a new vote soon.
Thanks,
Jacopo
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 4:53 PM Jacopo Cappellato <
jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.15", the 15th
Hi Omar, and thanks for sharing.
I started this upgrade as well as you can see on the jira [1]
I encountered a problem with The migration of JUEL connector and the
FlexibleStringExpander in doing so, and i didn't had time to work more
on the subject.
You're are more than welcome to share your
Hello developers at Ofbiz
I am new to the group, and want to share my changes with the people at
ofbiz,
I have done the following
- upgraded tomcat 10.x then I noticed a better performance,
- upgraded to tomcat 11 gaining even better.
- upgraded to jakarta servlet
- added also the H2 database
Hello Gaetan,
Apologies for the late reply. No, the issue is not solved.
I shall have time towards end of this week to set you access up and let you
know.
Thanks a mill to offer help.
Warm regards
Carsten
---
Dr. Carsten Schinzer
*Inhaber*
t +49 89 88569642 | f +49 89 99964059 | m +49
Hi Carsten, did you manage to solve your problem ?
Regards, Gaetan
On 6/21/24 14:45, Gaetan wrote:
Hi,
I created a public gitlab account account so that i can help you, with
this address : (mr.plop.p...@netcourrier.com)
If you feel confortable with it, you can share with me the repo link
Hi all,
does "Approve Order" on the "View Order" screen work for you?
I just had a quick test... "./gradlew cleanAll loadAll", Order Entry
with "DemoCustomer", 1x GZ-1000 .. Order is created, but when clicking
on "Approve Order" I get a
"org.apache.ofbiz.webapp.control.RequestHandlerException:
I‘m sorry,
I will not be able to test this release in due time (on vacation until end of
next week).
Best regards,
Michael
> Am 24.06.2024 um 16:53 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato
> :
>
> This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.15", the 15th
> release from the release18.12 branch.
Hello Jacopo
+1
with Linux/Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS and OpenJDK 11.0.23
Leila
Le 25/06/2024 à 11:45, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Thanks Jacopo,
Verification, back and front ends work for me me
+1
Jacques
Le 24/06/2024 à 16:53, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
This is the vote thread to publish
Thanks Jacopo,
Verification, back and front ends work for me me
+1
Jacques
Le 24/06/2024 à 16:53, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.15", the 15th
release from the release18.12 branch.
The release files can be downloaded from here:
This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.15", the 15th
release from the release18.12 branch.
The release files can be downloaded from here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/
and are:
* apache-ofbiz-18.12.15.zip
* KEYS: text file with keys
* apache-ofbiz-18.12.15.zip.asc:
Hi,
I created a public gitlab account account so that i can help you, with
this address : (mr.plop.p...@netcourrier.com)
If you feel confortable with it, you can share with me the repo link
(read only, of course).
Best regards
Gaetan
PS: i don't know if there are any community rules for
Thank you all for the warm welcome!
I'm excited to join the OFBiz project as a committer. I look forward to
contributing to the project's development and learning from this
wonderful community.
Sebastian
On 21.06.24 07:45, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Welcome on board
Jacques
Hi Gaetan,
Thanks to get back to me. I see no change - all the things you applied I
already did.
I also added your test case to the code and ran that locally - the test is
obviously not found.
It might have to do with the fact that I prefer JUnit 5 because of its advanced
parametrized testing
Hi Sebastian,
Welcome on board
Jacques
Le 20/06/2024 à 21:02, michael.br...@ecomify.de a écrit :
Congratulations and welcome, Sebastian!
Michael
Am 20.06.2024 um 16:21 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
The OFBiz PMC has invited Sebastian Tschikin to become a committer and
we are pleased to
Congratulations and welcome, Sebastian!
Michael
> Am 20.06.2024 um 16:21 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato
> :
>
> The OFBiz PMC has invited Sebastian Tschikin to become a committer and
> we are pleased to announce that Sebastian has accepted.
>
> On behalf of the OFBiz PMC, welcome on board!
Great news!
Welcome aboard, Sebastian.
Dan.
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 15:21, Jacopo Cappellato
wrote:
> The OFBiz PMC has invited Sebastian Tschikin to become a committer and
> we are pleased to announce that Sebastian has accepted.
>
> On behalf of the OFBiz PMC, welcome on board!
>
--
Hi Carsten, do you have any updates on your case ?
Regards,
Gaetan
On 6/11/24 09:58, Gaetan wrote:
Hello Carsten.
I set up a very small example plugin that i tested myself localy.
Could you please reproduce the steps below ?
- get ofbiz framework from apache repo
The OFBiz PMC has invited Sebastian Tschikin to become a committer and
we are pleased to announce that Sebastian has accepted.
On behalf of the OFBiz PMC, welcome on board!
Dear Jacques
Thank you very much for the response. I will use the user mailing list for
these questions. As I said I am very new to OfBiz so apologies for posting on
the wrong ML.
Kind regards
San
Sent from my iPhone
> On 13 Jun 2024, at 08:05, Jacques Le Roux
> wrote:
>
> BTW, you
BTW, you should rather use the user ML for such questions. It's explained at
https://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html:
<>
TIA
Le 13/06/2024 à 08:59, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi San,
Most of the Freemarker templates like Week.ftl (not Week.tpl) are not part of the common-theme. Because
Hi San,
Most of the Freemarker templates like Week.ftl (not Week.tpl) are not part of the common-theme. Because they are not common but specific to some
applications. For instance Week.ftl is only used by workeffort and humanres. So it's not a simple task to adapt it to your own theme.
Hello Gaetan
Thanks indeed for your efforts!This is what I am doing except the the XML
Schema here https://ofbiz.apache.org/dtds/test-suite.xsd
Complains when I do not add test-case elements, which I did. But even without
them that does not change the picture.
I am running on MacOS 14.5
Hello Carsten.
I set up a very small example plugin that i tested myself localy. Could
you please reproduce the steps below ?
- get ofbiz framework from apache repo
(https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework)
- checkout trunk on ofbiz framework
- get example plugin and set it up inside
Hi All
I’m very new to OfBiz so apologies in advance if I’m asking something obvious.
I started developing my own theme sub themed off the common-theme. There is a
template called Week.tpl under workeffort component. How do I override this
template in my custom theme?. All your help is much
Hello Gaetan,
I do all this as you describe, source path for tests is as required and
tests are properly annotated.
The main difference is that this is not a unit test out of a framework, but
unit tests sitting in a plugin component.
I so not see any traces of the framework stepping into my
Hi again,
After some research, it seems you should follow this kind of structure
for your unit tests :
https://github.com/apache/ofbiz-framework/blob/7c2487bc3f1a6ec472585c27d7ceb5ca19471387/build.gradle#L259
So you should setup your tests at the right package (either groovy or
java
… and after some more assertions, I can add:
I have verified the paths to all my test suites to point to the correct Java
classes.
I do not find any error in the test logs.
I do find the classes in the build/classes/java/test directory.
I do not find related test results at all.
An hint you can
Hello,
You mean like this:
Hi Carsten, did you include your tests in the ofbiz-component file a the
root of your plugin ?
Best regards
Gaetan
On 6/9/24 21:15, Carsten Schinzer wrote:
Hello all,
I am looking for a reference to integrate my plugin unit tests into the test
run of OfBiz, i.e. when I run
./gradlew
Hello all,
I am looking for a reference to integrate my plugin unit tests into the test
run of OfBiz, i.e. when I run
> ./gradlew test
My defined test suite should be included and executed.
I did browse the official plugin repository and found no reference.
First issue: how to define the
Hi Bill,
Though, as explained at https://ofbiz.apache.org/mailing-lists.html: > the dev ML is also open as long as your are subscribed.
Anyway, your report fits.
Speak to you later...
Jacques
Le 07/06/2024 à 02:25, Bill Harder a écrit :
I am new to this, but
I am new to this, but have been tracking this mail list for close to 6
months and trying to figure out OFBiz. I am not even sure if I can respond
to this mail list as I have no permissions to do anything. I spent 10+
hours trying to figure out why this drop down agreements list was not
showing.
Good morning devs,
Me and my colleague Nicola are attending the Community Over Code Event in
Bratislava.
Is any of you also participating? It would be great to meet you in person!
:)
Have a nice day,
Giulio
The Apache OFBiz community is pleased to announce the new release "Apache
OFBiz 18.12.14".
Apache OFBiz® is an open source product for the automation of enterprise
processes that includes framework components and business applications.
http://ofbiz.apache.org/
"Apache OFBiz 18.12.14" is the
The vote is successful with 3 binding votes.
I am going to proceed with the release.
Thanks,
Jacopo
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:31 AM Jacopo Cappellato
wrote:
>
> This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.14", the 14th
> release from the release18.12 branch.
>
> The release files
+1
Jacopo
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:31 AM Jacopo Cappellato
wrote:
>
> This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.14", the 14th
> release from the release18.12 branch.
>
> The release files can be downloaded from here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/
> and are:
> *
Typo
Le 30/05/2024 à 15:47, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
In "Invoices not yet (fully) applied", I'll also re-add the invoice description
list as it was present before.
In "Invoices not yet (fully) applied" list, I'll also re-add the invoice
description as it was present before.
Hi Deepak,
Yes you are right, /parentPaymentType/ is useless and cache on InvoiceType
would be better.
The idea is we get no information on the invoice type with the previous (old) situation. With other columns, we already know it's an invoice as can be
seen at
Hi Jacques,
I didn't get the logic behind this commit.
{code}
+
+
+
+
+
{code}
Why are we fetching parentPaymentType?
As we are using paymentType.description for display, same as other fields
as well.
This is not used
For my point of view, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-13101
My main point is that we should handle permissions in the screens
properly instead of just removing the functionality and only have them
in the menu. To provide functionality within the context is important
for
Hi,
Mostly for a creating action, do we need both a menu and a button for same
action? And if so why?
This has recently appeared at OFBIZ-13101, but IIRW some other cases where
handled the same.
If we do so (both) we then need to handle the permissions correctly. For instance, a person with
Thanks Daniel!
Le 25/05/2024 à 12:04, Daniel Watford a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
No documentation on how to handle the creation of a new release branch (and
nether the retirement of an old stable branch).
When the new branch is created, I'll take care of updating the docker
related build processes
Hi Jacques,
No documentation on how to handle the creation of a new release branch (and
nether the retirement of an old stable branch).
When the new branch is created, I'll take care of updating the docker
related build processes and deployments to the demo server. I'll also write
up some
Le 25/05/2024 à 11:32, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Daniel,
I don't remember if we talk about that already, sorry if it's the case.
Have we a documentation on how to update Docker for demos in case of the
creation of a new release branch?
TIA
Jacques
And please add a link at
Hi Daniel,
I don't remember if we talk about that already, sorry if it's the case.
Have we a documentation on how to update Docker for demos in case of the
creation of a new release branch?
TIA
Jacques
+1
Everything is working fine on Mac OS Sonoma and JDK17
Thanks and regards,
Michael
Am 24.05.24 um 11:31 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.14", the 14th
release from the release18.12 branch.
The release files can be downloaded from here:
Thanks Jacopo,
Works for me on Ubuntu 20.04
+1
Jacques
Le 24/05/2024 à 11:31, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.14", the 14th
release from the release18.12 branch.
The release files can be downloaded from here:
Thanks Pierre,
I relayed your propositions, not telling it's you, else... you know...
Le 24/05/2024 à 10:49, Pierre Smits a écrit :
Hi Daniel, Jacques,
Given that the content application has some sort of dependency on the lucene plugin, please consider making the indexing functionality of
This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.14", the 14th
release from the release18.12 branch.
The release files can be downloaded from here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/
and are:
* apache-ofbiz-18.12.14.zip
* KEYS: text file with keys
* apache-ofbiz-18.12.14.zip.asc:
Hi Daniel,
I would add example (maybe not examplext), quite useful when starting a
project. projectmgr and myportal seems interesting too.
About ecommerce, after years of ecomseo introduction I believe it should
replace ecommerce. So there would be no wondering about what to use.
lucene (w/o
Hello all,
Following on from discussions around a previous proposal regarding merging
_all_ plugins into ofbiz-framework [1], I would like to instead propose
that we consider 'bundling' _some_ selected plugins into ofbiz-framework.
The bundled plugins would be those deemed important enough by
Hi Daniel,
Now that with OFBIZ-13092 ecommerce is protected, at least so far. And as it's
the most important plugin, we could indeed put it in the framework
That would also definitely resolve OFBIZ-9185.
Example (and exampleext) would be good to be put in too, maybe projectmgr and
myportal.
Hi Jacques,
I raised the topic of merging the plugins into ofbiz-framework a while ago,
mostly due to the difficulty I found matching branches between the
ofbiz-framework and ofbiz-plugins repositories and keeping the two in sync.
I don't think we went in depth on the topic, but I think the
Hi,
This thread is already a 7 month "discussion", actually a vote. But I don't remember another about this point (not releasing the plugins). So I reuse
it, with a security perspective.
The last CVEs we had are possible because of ecommerce. A bunch of others were
related to Solr, etc.
I
Le 19/05/2024 à 10:58, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Is there somewhere some documentation about createPlugin Gradle task?
TIA
Jacques
Forgot, I did not find any at
https://nightlies.apache.org/ofbiz/trunk/ofbiz/html5/developer-manual.html#_apache_ofbiz_plugins_for_developer
Hi,
Is there somewhere some documentation about createPlugin Gradle task?
TIA
Jacques
Hi Nicolas,
No thank you, I just wait for the Freemarker vote to pass...
I have also created
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Release+24.xx+Roadmap
HTH
Jacques
Le 14/05/2024 à 17:20, Nicolas Malin a écrit :
Hello Jacques,
Do you need some help to move forward on this
Hello Jacques,
Do you need some help to move forward on this subject ?
Nicolas
Le 28/03/2024 à 10:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi,
Without negative answer this week, I'll set the 2.3.33 version on
trunk next week
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-12935
TIA (for your tests see
[Note: You're receiving this email because you are subscribed to one
or more project dev@ mailing lists at the Apache Software Foundation.]
We are very close to Community Over Code EU -- check out the amazing
program and the special discounts that we have for you.
Special discounts
You still
Le 09/05/2024 à 13:21, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Hi Michael,
Inline again
Le 08/05/2024 à 21:00, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
3. suddenly there was a mass of new PR's which were merged in a hurry
unneccesarily (my personal point of view), with some corrections soon after
4. 3. blocks 1. even
OK, make sense, let's wait
Le 09/05/2024 à 12:43, michael.br...@ecomify.de a écrit :
-1
I propose to wait until we have finished the move to the Hugo based website,
review and then link to the corresponding confluence pages.
We are almost finished with Hugo, one of our students (Nurhak)
Hi Michael,
Inline again
Le 08/05/2024 à 21:00, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
3. suddenly there was a mass of new PR's which were merged in a hurry
unneccesarily (my personal point of view), with some corrections soon after
4. 3. blocks 1. even further now because those changes are not
-1
I propose to wait until we have finished the move to the Hugo based website,
review and then link to the corresponding confluence pages.
We are almost finished with Hugo, one of our students (Nurhak) takes care of
it. He is currently at University and returns end of June to finish his work.
+1
Looks good to me.
--
Kind Regards,
Ashish Vijaywargiya
Vice President of Operations
*HotWax Systems*
*Enterprise open source experts*
http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 2:18 PM Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The pages
>
> https://ofbiz.apache.org/user-stories.html
>
Hi,
The pages
https://ofbiz.apache.org/user-stories.html
https://ofbiz.apache.org/service-providers.html
https://ofbiz.apache.org/about-ofbiz.html
https://ofbiz.apache.org/blog/ (It's only a link)
exists but are not maintained. I propose to remove them from the repo.
The News menu also would
Ah, last but not least: I think we should at least wait for Freemarker 2.3.33 that we successfully tested on demo. The vote should be soon, hence the
release.
Le 08/05/2024 à 20:47, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
Thanks to clarify Michael,
Inline when needed...
Le 08/05/2024 à 13:59, Michael
Thanks to clarify Michael,
Inline when needed...
Le 08/05/2024 à 13:59, Michael Brohl a écrit :
Hi everyone,
my main point for having a roadmap and (if necessary) freezing trunk (for a short time) before creating a release branch in the future was to avoid
the situation we have now:
1. we
Thanks for confirming
Le 08/05/2024 à 15:45, Pranay Pandey a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
Yeah, I wanted to say that. As long as we are sure of test coverage, all
the critical paths are working.
Best regards,
Pranay Pandey
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 22:11, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
Ha sorry Pranay,
I
Severity: important
Affected versions:
- Apache OFBiz before 18.12.13
Description:
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
vulnerability in Apache OFBiz.This issue affects Apache OFBiz: before 18.12.13.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version
Hi Jacques,
Yeah, I wanted to say that. As long as we are sure of test coverage, all
the critical paths are working.
Best regards,
Pranay Pandey
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 22:11, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> Ha sorry Pranay,
>
> I did not get your point, I guess you were discussing before frezzing
Hi Michael,
Yeah, that makes a lot of sense to have a structure in place for sure.
Best regards,
Pranay Pandey
On Wed, 8 May 2024 at 17:30, Michael Brohl wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> my main point for having a roadmap and (if necessary) freezing trunk
> (for a short time) before creating a
Hi everyone,
my main point for having a roadmap and (if necessary) freezing trunk
(for a short time) before creating a release branch in the future was to
avoid the situation we have now:
1. we agreed to create a new release branch some time ago
2. there were some open tasks which blocked
OK, thanks Jacopo
Le 08/05/2024 à 13:50, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Yes, it is normal because that is the dev distribution folder: as soon
as the release becomes official the files are moved to the official
distribution folder: https://downloads.apache.org/ofbiz/
Jacopo
On Tue, May 7, 2024
Yes, it is normal because that is the dev distribution folder: as soon
as the release becomes official the files are moved to the official
distribution folder: https://downloads.apache.org/ofbiz/
Jacopo
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 4:07 PM Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
>
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> I see only KEYS
>
>
I totally agree, our enemy is regression and we should be very sure to avoid it.
Le 07/05/2024 à 17:19, Pranay Pandey a écrit :
Hi Daniel,
I am in favor of creating a new release.
After we create a new release, IMO we shouldn't be committing any new
features there.
This is critical that we
Ha sorry Pranay,
I did not get your point, I guess you were discussing before frezzing the
release branch, right?
Then of course we can't guarantee to have fixed all known bugs.
Only blocker bugs (decided by the reporter and discussed if needed) and of
course security bugs are blocking a
Le 07/05/2024 à 17:01, Daniel Watford a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
I'm sorry, but I can't quite parse your question, 'What is the
difference...'. Could you restate it another way?
Simple, what is the process so far?
We freeze the trunk into a release branch, says 24.xx in our case
.05 seems short
Hi Pranay,
OK, but then only that? So far we backported any bug. So we would release a
branch with bugs in?
Le 07/05/2024 à 16:42, Pranay Pandey a écrit :
Hi Jacques,
what is a blocker bug, only security?
I think it should also include anything broken on the UI or at the process
level.
Best
Hi Daniel,
I am in favor of creating a new release.
After we create a new release, IMO we shouldn't be committing any new
features there.
This is critical that we limit the scope of release with ongoing
development in the trunk.
Best regards,
Pranay Pandey
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 20:31, Daniel
Hi Jacques,
I'm sorry, but I can't quite parse your question, 'What is the
difference...'. Could you restate it another way?
Are you asking what the difference is between enforcing a feature-freeze on
trunk versus continuing to allow all changes to trunk whilst having a
feature-freeze on a
Hi Jacques,
what is a blocker bug, only security?
I think it should also include anything broken on the UI or at the process
level.
Best regards,
Pranay Pandey
On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 19:48, Jacques Le Roux
wrote:
> What is the difference between freezing the trunk in a release-24.xx where
>
What is the difference between freezing the trunk in a release-24.xx where the rule is no improvements but if a consensus agrees with? In other words,
apart exceptions only bugs and not only blockers,as we did so far and the "new" proposition? Do we really wants to backport only blockerbugs? And
Hi Jacopo,
I see only KEYS
TIA
Jacqued
Le 07/05/2024 à 11:41, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
The vote is successful with seven positive votes (all binding) and no
negative votes.
I am going to publish and announce the release soon.
Jacopo
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 5:06 PM Jacopo Cappellato
Dear Daniel,
Thank you for outlining the proposed release strategy for OFBiz. I liked
the idea of creating a new branch from trunk named 'release-24.05' to
address blockers for the upcoming release.
I agree with Michael's proposal that targeting a release while working on
the trunk is worth
The Apache OFBiz community is pleased to announce the new release "Apache
OFBiz 18.12.13".
Apache OFBiz® is an open source product for the automation of enterprise
processes that includes framework components and business applications.
http://ofbiz.apache.org/
"Apache OFBiz 18.12.13" is the
The vote is successful with seven positive votes (all binding) and no
negative votes.
I am going to publish and announce the release soon.
Jacopo
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 5:06 PM Jacopo Cappellato
wrote:
>
> This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.13", the thirteenth
> release
+1
Jacopo
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 5:06 PM Jacopo Cappellato
wrote:
>
> This is the vote thread to publish "Apache OFBiz 18.12.13", the thirteenth
> release from the release18.12 branch.
>
> The release files can be downloaded from here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/
> and are:
1 - 100 of 103062 matches
Mail list logo
