Hi Bruno,
With addons you don't use a svn for manage OFBiz customer instance.
Here is process that I use for my customer :
1. Take a fix OFBiz revision
2. Install addons that I need for manage the specific customer process
who not support by OFBiz
3. Create and install addon specific for my cus
Thank you Erwan for this clause-by-clause to the Neogia addon manager.
To be sincere I was looking to something different from what seems to
be a patch manager.
I see that using patches is a solution that has no limit on what can
be done. (A patch can be even a complete remake of an application).
Hi Bruno,
here are some comments inline
Le 19/12/2009 00:10, Bruno Busco a écrit :
I try to write down some ideas I have on how I would like add-on
modules in OFBiz.
-- Add-on module management --
Every module should have a name, a version, a description, an author etc.
Every module should hav
Drupal uses hooks : http://api.drupal.org/api/group/hooks/7
Maybe something to get inspired by. It seems to provide good
independance between modules.
Cimballi
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
> I try to write down some ideas I have on how I would like add-on
> modules in OF
I try to write down some ideas I have on how I would like add-on
modules in OFBiz.
-- Add-on module management --
Every module should have a name, a version, a description, an author etc.
Every module should have a list of modules from which it depends.
A module should be added to the system using
her
>>>>>> components are
>>>>>> Zimbra for email and concrete5 for web.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Over this time, we've spent our efforts providing an entirely new UI
>>>>>> front
>>>>>> end for the backend applications: sales order, inventory, CRM, admin,
>>>>>> reports, multi tenancy, published datasets (makes solution targeted for
>>>>>> any
>>>>>> market or geography), etc...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have expressed privately that Ofbiz needs to have a new mission in
>>>>>> order to really drive it's importance and relevance as an open source
>>>>>> project. As it stands, it's scope is very wide, and not targeted a
>>>>>> providing and out-of-the box solution to any problem, save ecommerce
>>>>>> (even
>>>>>> then, lot's of styling work usually needed).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We would be 100% behind this direction for Ofbiz. We'd want to
>>>>>> contribute
>>>>>> back components now that are Emforium proprietary and would work to
>>>>>> reduce
>>>>>> the amount of deviation between our proprietary solution and this newly
>>>>>> stated direction.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Marc
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://n4.nabble.com/Apache-OFBiz-EZBiz-tp277317p974666.html
>> Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
eb.
>>>>>
>>>>> Over this time, we've spent our efforts providing an entirely new UI
>>>>> front
>>>>> end for the backend applications: sales order, inventory, CRM, admin,
>>>>> reports, multi tenancy, published data
Application patch is atomic to be sure that an addon don't break the
OFBiz file hierarchy.
Nicolas
Erwan de FERRIERES a écrit :
Le 18/12/2009 11:44, Scott Gray a écrit :
So Neogia add ons are basically just managed patches?
Basically yes. But, if you go deeper in the addons, there are :
im
Le 18/12/2009 11:44, Scott Gray a écrit :
So Neogia add ons are basically just managed patches?
Basically yes. But, if you go deeper in the addons, there are :
improved patchs : if two addons are modifying the same file, both
patches are applied one after the other.
versioning
dependancies
h
g work usually needed).
We would be 100% behind this direction for Ofbiz. We'd want to
contribute
back components now that are Emforium proprietary and would work to
reduce
the amount of deviation between our proprietary solution and this newly
stated direction.
Marc
--
View this m
So Neogia add ons are basically just managed patches?
Regards
Scott
On 18/12/2009, at 11:30 PM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Le 17/12/2009 22:46, Bruno Busco a écrit :
Having OFBiz splitted in a core framework and add-on modules seems to
me like a must if we want to improve features.
Add-on mo
Le 17/12/2009 22:46, Bruno Busco a écrit :
Having OFBiz splitted in a core framework and add-on modules seems to
me like a must if we want to improve features.
Add-on modules is how many large and popular projects are built.
Even OpenERP says to have more that 350 modules and offers different
f
o
reduce
the amount of deviation between our proprietary solution and this newly
stated direction.
Marc
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Apache-OFBiz-EZBiz-tp277317p974666.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
t;>
>>>> We have expressed privately that Ofbiz needs to have a new mission in
>>>> order to really drive it's importance and relevance as an open source
>>>> project. As it stands, it's scope is very wide, and not targeted a
>>>> providing and out-of-the box solution to any problem, save ecommerce
>>>> (even
>>>> then, lot's of styling work usually needed).
>>>>
>>>> We would be 100% behind this direction for Ofbiz. We'd want to
>>>> contribute
>>>> back components now that are Emforium proprietary and would work to
>>>> reduce
>>>> the amount of deviation between our proprietary solution and this newly
>>>> stated direction.
>>>>
>>>> Marc
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Apache-OFBiz-EZBiz-tp277317p974666.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I am a big fan of OSGi and I feel it is a right component management
technology to manage big project like OFBiz. This is one of the best to
manage the component dependencies. I will work further on the OFBiz-OSGi
and put more examples of how new bundles (aka plug-ins) can be developed.
Thanks
That's an interesting perspective. It's definitely true that if you don't
collaborate on design and underlying data and such that you'll end up with a
huge mess of incompatible "features".
I agree that it is an advantage of OFBiz that when differences come up in how
people want to do things it
On Dec 17, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Bruno Busco wrote:
> Having OFBiz splitted in a core framework and add-on modules seems to
> me like a must if we want to improve features.
> Add-on modules is how many large and popular projects are built.
> Even OpenERP says to have more that 350 modules and offers
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
Addons are certainly a good idea. But a good handling of them is also required
(in other words they should never interfer).
I have a prospective customer (IT manager), who said that his company is using
OpenERP (Python) but he is worried about the mess
addons bring. He
Addons are certainly a good idea. But a good handling of them is also required
(in other words they should never interfer).
I have a prospective customer (IT manager), who said that his company is using
OpenERP (Python) but he is worried about the mess
addons bring. He talked by experience...
I
Having OFBiz splitted in a core framework and add-on modules seems to
me like a must if we want to improve features.
Add-on modules is how many large and popular projects are built.
Even OpenERP says to have more that 350 modules and offers different
flavours of it here http://www.openerp.com/disco
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
Hi Marc,
Great! BTW, I think http://www.allinsoftware.com/ deserves a line in the 1st table at
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Apache+OFBiz+User+List, isn'it ?
I will also put one on the OFBiz site, if you don't mind ?
Done on OFBiz site
Jacques
Jacques
From:
Hi Marc,
Great! BTW, I think http://www.allinsoftware.com/ deserves a line in the 1st table at
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBIZ/Apache+OFBiz+User+List, isn'it ?
I will also put one on the OFBiz site, if you don't mind ?
Jacques
From: "Marc Morin"
As many of you know, we at Emforium have b
This sounds fantastic Marc - it's amazing to see many of the software
providers out there coming together to back this idea. This has the
unique opportunity of taking everything that OFBiz does to the next
level.
I guess the big question is, what's next to help get some of these
backend
As many of you know, we at Emforium have been busy building out a full set of
business software application to provide an "ALL-IN" comprehensive solution for
the small business market. When we started the evaluation over a year ago,
Ofbiz was the selected platform of choice. Other components a
Hi David,
I'm very pleased of this new development. On Neogia project, we've been working
for a few years on having a generic system that give the possibility to create
quickly screens and data for any type of society.
The problem with small buisnesses is that they need a system out of the box
Hi David,
Will you be setting up a wiki area or jira issue dedicated to EZBiz so that
we can follow developments?
Many thanks,
Chris
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/Apache-OFBiz-EZBiz-tp277317p277475.html
Sent from the OFBiz - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
From: "Ean Schuessler"
David E Jones wrote:
I've started work on a new application for OFBiz, and tentatively
decided on the name "EZBiz" for it. I considered "QuickBiz", but
that's maybe too suggestive of a certain competing commercial
application. ;)
The main idea is to create an all-in-one
Hallelujah! I have to say Ean, that the missing link for how amazing
WebSlinger can be in OFBiz (we've all been blown away many times now),
has always been this reference implementation of it in use in the
eComm world. POS coupled with more integrations and an amazing front
end editing sy
David E Jones wrote:
> I've started work on a new application for OFBiz, and tentatively
> decided on the name "EZBiz" for it. I considered "QuickBiz", but
> that's maybe too suggestive of a certain competing commercial
> application. ;)
>
> The main idea is to create an all-in-one application in O
David,
Not much to say, so far
I have learned a new word : vagaries.
eZBiz could be considered a competive name also, but not in the same area
(watch my eyes : CMS, anyway joke)
OK, in one word I'm certainly interested but not much time to spend at short
term.
Also I don't know how they progr
+1 - as I'm sure you know David, this is something we are VERY
interested in and will back you and the community 100%. This has made
my week!
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 27, 2009, at 2:39 PM, David E Jones wrot
David,
Congratulations, really exciting stuff. I have been trying to
contribute your UBPL effort and this next effort is inline with where
I'll like ofbiz to go. Sure I'll be able to find ways to contribute in
this effort.
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
http://www.hotwaxmed
I've started work on a new application for OFBiz, and tentatively
decided on the name "EZBiz" for it. I considered "QuickBiz", but
that's maybe too suggestive of a certain competing commercial
application. ;)
The main idea is to create an all-in-one application in OFBiz for
smaller busi
33 matches
Mail list logo
