/volunteers.html
I'd really like to prevent a fork, especially a needless one.
--
Martin Cooper
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 21:11:49 -0600, Vic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David just bloged that he wants to fork tiles to separate Struts
I think Struts deves have been looking for someone to develop Tiles,
like
The original commit message was rejected for being too large. Here's the
first part. I forgot to mention in the message that this also includes the
additional attributes for the 'errors' tag.
--
Martin Cooper
-- Forwarded message --
Date: 28 Dec 2004 05:32:42 -
From: [EMAIL
GA release on that branch at some point, probably sooner rather than
later.
So now that we're in SVN-land, what is the simplest way of taking the
changes in one commit and applying them to another branch?
--
Martin Cooper
, which I was going
to spend on the build. So if you'd like some help with the
restructuring you're working on, let me know.
--
Martin Cooper
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 12:22:33 -0800, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've made further progress in extracting tiles and taglibs, and have run
into several
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:47:04 -0600, Vic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
from main menu in struts clicking download binaries give a cgi error.
Fixed.
I've also changed the privs on the cgi script to try to prevent this
from happening again.
--
Martin Cooper
Is there another link for 1.3 nigly
.)
So what do people think? My preference, as I said, is (1).
--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
into a separate subproject, then we
have the wrong abstraction, and other people would not be able to
build extensions like Tiles without help in the form of changes to the
core.
--
Martin Cooper
Craig
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
. That will get me beating
on this in short order, so that we can refine the way it works and
iron out any issues.
Next up: extracting the taglibs :)
You're a glutton for punishment, lad. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
Don
-
To unsubscribe, e
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 19:25:09 -0800, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to request the following Bugzilla components be added:
- bsf
- sandbox
Done.
--
Martin Cooper
If I do this myself, please point me in the right direction. Thanks.
Don
, via TilesServlet (which I
believe already exists?) and/or a new ServletContextListener
implementation since we're willing to use Servlet 2.3.
+1
--
Martin Cooper
Craig
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 18:29:43 -0800, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It has been discussed, I believe, to separate
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 13:13:03 -0800, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 12:54:38 -0800, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 12:38:27 -0800, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 00:55:56 -0600, Eddie Bush [EMAIL
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:06:56 -0800, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Intermixed.
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:36:41 -0800, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 13:13:03 -0800, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 12:54:38 -0800, Martin
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 09:09:16 -0600, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:29 PM -0800 12/16/04, Don Brown wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:47:53 -0800, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who is working on bringing Struts chain into Struts core? If no one, I
wouldn't
details :)
This is effectively the inverse of extends, right? It's push rather
than pull, in that the master pushes config down into the subs, rather
than the subs pulling config from the master. I need to think a bit
about the pros and cons of each of these...
--
Martin Cooper
Don
Martin
as our means of
publishing documentation (and the site), and come up with a better way
of updating the site reliably. But that's a future itch, for another
day. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
Thanks for the help.
Don
-
To unsubscribe
Fine with me. Are you planning to do this for the 1.2 branch as well as trunk?
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 23:15:21 -, Niall Pemberton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone object to me moving Strut's dependency on to the recently
released Version 1.1.4 of Commons Validator
this.
Otherwise, comments appreciated. I'll target the integration Sunday or
Monday if I don't hear different.
Sounds great!
--
Martin Cooper
Don
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail
I'm working on this right now. I have the 'get' stuff done locally,
but there's some other build stuff I want to clean up before I commit
that. (Last night's Cactus property clean-up was part of that.)
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:10:50 -0800, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
. If
you want to gripe about on- or off-topic, I highly recomment replying
to the message that you have a problem with, and not one that asks a
valid on-topic question.
--
Martin Cooper
What you suggest I said is patently stupid. So, I have to admit I
don't think that. No one would think
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Dakota Jack wrote:
How is JSF not OT with struts-dev or struts-user? Struts is not dead
yet, is it? And, if not, why is struts airtime free to JSF?
You don't consider a question about STRUTS-chain - a component in the
Struts sandbox - to be relevant to Struts?
--
Martin
://struts.apache.org/download.cgi
The Release Notes are available on the Struts web site at:
http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/release-notes.html
--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands
Currently, we say that Ant 1.5.4 is required for building Struts. I'd like
to bump that to 1.6.2 as a minimum, so that we can take advantage of some
of the features that were introduced in Ant 1.6.
Anyone have any objections?
--
Martin Cooper
many copies of the mailreader example all over the
place? Why can't we just keep one copy and have a build that can handle
building for core or chain or shale or xyz?
Can't answer that one. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 10:51:24 -0800 (PST), David Graham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have a problem with tossing the Maven stuff. However, I
believe we do have some Maven mavens in our midst who likely feel
otherwise. This might sound odd
This is what Maven-generated Ant builds use.
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 9 Dec 2004 10:51:24 -0800 (PST), David Graham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't have a problem with tossing the Maven stuff. However, I
believe we do have some Maven mavens in our
of the distribution using the keys found on the main Apache web
site:
http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/commons/chain/KEYS
For more information on Commons Chain, see the Chain web site:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/chain/
--
Martin Cooper
We did just get Commons Resources promoted out of the sandbox, and I'm
hopeful that we'll get that puppy released soon. Finally!
--
Martin Cooper
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:37:38 -0800 (PST), David Graham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We didn't do it earlier because we wanted to use commons-resources
Hmm, that's odd. How are you trying to build? I can run 'ant clean
dist' just fine with Digester 1.6, and that builds
tiles-documentation.war.
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:54:36 -0500, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't compile the tiles-documentation sources
open the door for just about any other tool's config
files to be kept in our repo. If it's OK for Eclipse, why not IDEA,
netBeans, JBuilder, JDeveloper, emacs, ...? How would we keep that
mess up to date?
--
Martin Cooper
Joe
-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto
Please move this thread to a Java language mailing list. This
discussion is not related to Struts. Thanks.
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:30:03 -0800, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig,
I am thinking of doing a wrapper, e.g. PointComposite, which will then
not have
, then great! But have the Struts
part of the discussion here, and please ask your Java language
questions elsewhere. By your logic, this list would be open to any and
all Java language questions, and I for one am very strongly against
allowing that to happen.
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12
Thanks. I've fixed this by removing the two Struts references from the
Jakarta FAQs page, since Struts is no longer part of Jakarta.
--
Martin Cooper
On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 09:29:16 -0600, Matt Bathje [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys
Not sure where to send this, but I figured one of you would
Availability (GA)
-
If you are voting for Alpha or Beta, please state your concerns with
the build as it is today.
Only the votes of Struts PMC members are binding. However, all
opinions and feedback are welcome.
--
Martin Cooper
My own vote...
Beta. While a number of issues have been reported, my opinion is that
#32490 is enough to preclude GA, since I believe we need to have the
tag libraries in sync for a GA release.
--
Martin Cooper
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 22:49:35 -0800, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
that this
will land up as a key/value pair in the mapped property set.
--
Martin Cooper
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 16:05:16 -0800, Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, works for me :)
Don
Joe Germuska wrote:
snip /
Now, then: This whole thread started as a different question
dependencies, and
making the framework more testable. :-)
--
Martin Cooper
Is there any interest in this, or is it cracked? If it's not
cracked, we might also take a longer-term look at abstracting the
session, which seems tedious, but has some of the same issues. We
may never need to truly
and
the module's resource bundles are stashed, amongst other things as you
suggested.
--
Martin Cooper
Ted, in fact, suggested an API bean previously as well, and I believe
has even started sketching out what one might look like.
Don
Joe Germuska wrote:
While I'm one who has had good
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 13:33:38 -0500, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 20:42:07 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:27:44 -0500, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There's a download module in the struts-examples application.
Er, that's an upload
it, then I believe the Java compiler has a standard API that
you can call, although I don't know off the top of my head where that
is documented. Someone else might know.
--
Martin Cooper
Jack
--
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
~Native Proverb~
Each man
is, and is not, accepted, making
it difficult to close the door to any random Struts app once the door
is open.
Of course, this is just me; other Struts committers may have different opinions.
--
Martin Cooper
Jack
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 19:18:23 -0500, Frank W. Zammetti
[EMAIL PROTECTED
, but not into the builds - like the code that lives in
'contrib' today.
Apparently, that's not what you're suggesting. So perhaps you could
clarify what it is that you _are_ suggesting? ;-) If it's not in
Struts SVN, and it's not in Struts Applications at SourceForge, what -
and where - is it?
--
Martin Cooper
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 23:27:44 -0500, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a download module in the struts-examples application.
Er, that's an upload example. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
Originally, these were separate applications demonstrating validation,
download, and so forth, but we
it in Shale. ;-)
Also, it seems unfortunate that ShaleWebContext appears to be already
nailed to the servlet API, rather than usable with portlets as well.
--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:53:00 -0800, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:44:04 -0800, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason that a JSF-independent version of the
application-wide controller scheme, as just checked in, couldn't be
part
instituted a policy of not depending on any other components that are
unreleased, that's not going to happen until Commons Chain is released
- which is exactly why I'm pushing to get that released. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
I would assume that the nighly bulids would then have chain
the 'core' directly.
The remainder of the instructions are here:
http://struts.apache.org/userGuide/installation.html#Building
The Struts SVN download, by the way, was 1.68 gigs on the disk.
Woo hoo!
You might want to just get struts/*/trunk instead of the whole enchilada. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
that ServletUnit is a
good, stable, full-featured framework for testing, well, servlet-based
code. I'd like us to take a look at that before we make any hard
decisions about testing frameworks.
--
Martin Cooper
Don
Joe Germuska wrote:
I just found an annoying bug in struts-chain, where
, WrapDynaBean.getInstance(), and FastHashMap,. What's up?
You need to update your BeanUtils and Digester versions. See section 1.5 here:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsRelease126
--
Martin Cooper
Thanks,
Jack
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:04:02 -0800, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
side-tracked into a config
implementation - but I'm hoping that will be done soon. Once
FileUpload 1.1 is released, then I'll get to work on fixing the big
mess that is upload in Struts 1.2. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:59:37 -0800, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks
there didn't seem much point (at least until I'm trying to work
on multiple branches at the same time).
--
Martin Cooper
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:00:49 -0600, Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the best (ie. quickest, most painless) way to update one's local SVN
repository when
via the lists or via the bug
database.
--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. Going forward, the intent is to independently
release components, so we probably won't be tagging everything again. I
just wanted to make sure we had a solid grounding if we ever need to back
up.
--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe
create a 1.2.x branch at the same time as I do the 1.2.6 label.
--
Martin Cooper
We did tag and roll 1.2.5, it just didn't go anyplace, which is going to
happen now and again.
-Ted.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:21:30 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote:
Seams that Chain is only for Struts 1.2
the class over,
keeping history, etc., when 'core' and 'faces' have separate trunk /
branches / tags?
boolean martin_happy = (answer.equals(yes)); // ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
Don
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 10:03:27 -0800, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the initial reasons for having one trunk
?
--
Martin Cooper
Craig
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
that it was also subscribed to the user list, and I
just unsubscribed it from that. We should be OK now.
--
Martin Cooper
I actually tried to contact the postmaster, but never heard anything back,
the last time around.
Eddie
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
that), JSF would
help you get there faster. Unfortunately, that's not the case for me,
and probably for many people building next generation web apps.
--
Martin Cooper
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:54:16 -0700, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 11:03:29 -0700, Martin Cooper
Action that delegates to a chain, it seems to me that
it would make more sense to base things on Chain, and have a standard
Command that delegates to an Action to preserve backwards
compatibilty.
--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e
with each other out of band as it were, which kinda
defeats the purpose of having a component based framework.
--
Martin Cooper
--
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
Don Brown wrote:
I'm personally fond of vcXMLRPC - http
://struts.apache.org/release-checklist.html
+1 (with the corrected link to the HTTPD guidelines ;)
--
Martin Cooper
-Ted.
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:59:28 -0500, Eddie Bush wrote:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/decisions.html
^^ Link to Tomcat Procedures ^^
http://jakarta.apache.org/site
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 14:33:12 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Cooper wrote:
The app you describe does sound a little more extreme than one might
want, but I think it's a great illustration of what can be done with
JavaScript on the client. The primary app I work
?
There is already a standard way of doing this, of sorts. It's XML.
The XMLHttpRequest object provides a means to do this, as do
browser-based frameworks such as netWindows / nWidgets and Ismorphic
SmartClient, amongst others.
--
Martin Cooper
Especially when dealing with richer user interfaces
is the right way to
do this, and I'll let Ted define the process we use, even if I
consider that to be the wrong way. If everyone else is happy with
that, then so be it.
--
Martin Cooper
Most of the issues raised in this thread should be resolved as part of the release
plan, rather than after
in production? Give me a
break, Ted. First you hijack the original intent to move to a Tomcat
release process and convert it to the HTTPD process instead, and now
you want to hijack the voting process as well?
--
Martin Cooper
If we don't have the courage to use a distribution in our own work, then we
things out (anonymously)
using SVN without a hitch.
Just guessing, but this (your anonymous checkout) might be the
problem. If you didn't check out using the HTTPS URL, then you won't
be able to check in changes.
--
Martin Cooper
I have tried multiple forms of my username - all have met
Hmm, that's odd. I unsubscribed that address last night. Not sure why
it would still be bouncing. ;-(
--
Martin Cooper
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:06:44 -0500, Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm a committer for the Jakarta Struts project, and I'm just wondering if
the person below
Um, that's Apache Commons. Jakarta Commons is alive and well. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:15:14 -0500, Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Commons is closing? It only had one project in it? Am I delusional or is
that incorrect?
The commons is a hustle and bustle
whether it's in the external component
or in the glue, I think the bug should be left here until that is
determined.
--
Martin Cooper
Does that rub anyone wrong? Why? I'm curious about protocol here.
Perhaps we should close the bug and file the new one on their behalf, including
their email
...
I think that's fine as long as you add a comment to that effect in the
bug report.
--
Martin Cooper
Thanks! :-)
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0443-3, 10/22/2004
Tested on: 10/23/2004 11:26:34 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 2000-2004 ALWIL Software.
http
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:54:35 -0700, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:39:44 -0700, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:28:29 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:47:56 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
When
...
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:38:15 -0700, Martin Cooper
(BTW, I'm more than a little surprised at the amount of energy
you're putting into this, Ted, given that you've told us all
you're going Emeritus anyway, so that those of us remaining will
be the folks rolling the releases. ;)
Been
on the Tomcat
approach. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
-Ted.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 21:50:21 -0500, Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: He's baack
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:05:39
like to see us follow, terminology and
all.
--
Martin Cooper
Craig
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:32:30 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A release requires a vote, whereas a build does not. Also,
referring to a test build as alpha is prejudging the quality of the
build; it could
For a very long time now, we have had a strict policy of not including
anything that is not part of the HTML 4.01 spec or XHTML spec. I am
still very much in favour of that policy, and am actively
disinterested in seeing non-conforming additions to Struts.
--
Martin Cooper
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004
Do you have a particular objection to adopting the Tomcat scheme,
which Craig and I, at least, prefer over the HTTPD scheme? Can't we
just settle on the Tomcat scheme and move on?
--
Martin Cooper
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:02:35 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terminology isn't
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:31:45 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:13:51 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
Do you have a particular objection to adopting the Tomcat scheme,
which Craig and I, at least, prefer over the HTTPD scheme? Can't we
just settle on the Tomcat
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:28:29 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 20:47:56 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
When we first started discussing changes to the way we build and
release Struts, the model that was proposed was the Tomcat model,
and that is still the model I
that I want
to see us adopt. It was actually my understanding that we had already
done so, which is why I've been following it. If the HTTPD process is
different from that, then I am -1 on adopting that process.
--
Martin Cooper
I think only the promotion of a release from alpha should require
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 12:13:10 -0500, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 9:35 AM -0700 10/18/04, Martin Cooper wrote:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 08:07:41 -0500, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's my +1 for adopting the HTTP server release process, with
whatever modifications we deem
Actually, it's not Beta (or Alpha or GA) nor is it a Release, until we
vote on it, in, say, a week from now. At this point, it's just a Test
Build. Until the community has got used to this new build numbering
scheme, we need to be very careful about how we label each build.
--
Martin Cooper
Thanks. I've requested the change.
--
Martin Cooper
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:19:00 +1300, Richard Bywater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering if its just me, or is the Bugzilla Bug Report still
going to the old [EMAIL PROTECTED] address? Should this
be changed to the new dev
I would suggest just taking this line out...
--
Martin Cooper
On 16 Oct 2004 16:09:27 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: germuska
Date: Sat Oct 16 09:09:25 2004
New Revision: 54927
Modified:
struts/trunk/src/test/org/apache/struts/action/TestActionMessages.java
IMO, all we need is $Id$. That includes the revision number and the date anyway.
--
Martin Cooper
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 08:32:05 -0500, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can do this, but a quick googling didn't turn up any specifics on
what the change should be.
OK, I have started
specific. So making a change to a file
might cause the revision number to change from 55123 to 56456. IMHO,
the value of including that information in JavaDocs is dubious.
--
Martin Cooper
-Paul
Martin Cooper wrote:
I would suggest just taking this line out...
--
Martin Cooper
to a FileUpload 1.1 Beta, so I would definitely not want us to wait
around for that for Struts 1.2.5 (although I do want to get there
soon).
I have no objection to the BeanUtils and Digester version changes, though.
--
Martin Cooper
LazyDynaBeans are definitely cool, though.
Niall
Craig
. As for verifying the presence of a request attribute, it
seems that the Jakarta Taglibs request taglib has a tag which can
do that.
http://jakarta.apache.org/taglibs/doc/request-doc/request-1.0/index.html#reference
Or you can use JSTL for this too:
c:if test=${requestScope.myAttr}
...
/c:if
--
Martin
the search/replace/commit using BBEdit in ten or fifteen
minutes, tops as soon as I get a few confirmations...
Doh! Crossed lines. You volunteered before I did, so go for it. ;-)
Yes, $Id$ is what we want.
--
Martin Cooper
Joe
--
Joe Germuska
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blog.germuska.com
let me know. Otherwise, I'll dig into the SVN book and try to
figure it out.
--
Martin Cooper
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 22:17:39 -0500, Eddie Bush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy Y'all,
I'm getting an internal server error (HTTP 500) when trying to download via the site.
I thought I'd throw an FYI
. You know where to find me on IM. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
- Original Message -
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday
stuff in a 1.2.x
build, then create a 1.2.x branch at that tag, and then roll in the
chain stuff as the first step on the 1.3.x ladder?
--
Martin Cooper
And if Don wants to start setting up struts-flow and struts-scripting along the
same lines as struts-faces, I'll buy him a Guiness (or three
switched over to talk about SVN rather than CVS.
--
Martin Cooper
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
- Original Message -
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:53:10 +0100, Pilgrim, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
While I don't disagree with any of Ted's points, I do think that we
need to expand our horizons with Struts Next, rather than just provide
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 06:26:00 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:22:38 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
That said, I would really like to see us all stick together for as
long as possible, and not diverge into 1.x and 2.x paths too soon,
simply because I don't think
itch speaking, since I live in the world of
highly interactive browser-based applications these days...
--
Martin Cooper
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 15:42:10 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To follow up some other threads about the architectural vision for Struts Next,
I'd like to offer
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 06:40:38 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 21:38:26 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
At this point, I'm not sure we all agree on what would constitute a
part of v2 rather than v1, since I anticipate some fairly
substantial changes going into what
of a migration to Maven if the other
developers want to build and maintain the system ... but I'm
personally going to generate build.xml files for the subprojects for
my own personal use, and I'm gonna be unhappy if that doesn't work
because of dramatically customized Maven builds.
Ditto.
--
Martin
to customise those
standard tasks in some way to do what they need to do. IMHO, this is
where much of the mystery lies in figuring out what happened when
things go wrong.
--
Martin Cooper
That being said, some of the plug-ins are written in such a way that
they are difficult to understand
build already gives you that - try 'ant release'. This
is what I use to, um, build the releases. ;-)
--
Martin Cooper
That being said, I
use Ant rather than Maven for all my non-Jakarta work. Maven just doesn't
solve any problems that Ant can't solve just as easily. Not to mention
the fact
a disagreement on whether or not some substantial
change (that someone is ready to commit) should be going into the
current tree. ;-}
--
Martin Cooper
Then, whatever is under the root /trunk has not been reorganized yet, and
everything under /v1/trunk has already been reorganized as an artifact
901 - 1000 of 1110 matches
Mail list logo
