-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| What evidence is there that people need to have multi-gigabyte
| datastores? We aren't necessarily helping ourselves by telling people
| they need to devote anywhere from 1-5% of their total hard disks to
| Freenet, unless it *really is* necessary.
fast now because it polls constantly.
>
> regards
> Neo at NHNG
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/30a629bf/attachment.pgp>
was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/fa09a158/attachment.pgp>
e.
regards
Neo at NHNG
--
Follow the blue rabbit - The Freenet Project - http://freenetproject.org/
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/a9671cd8/attachment.pgp>
er retention).
>
> All important, but the website is also important.
>
> Ian.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/7d9f7c92/attachment.pgp>
part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/7e983135/attachment.pgp>
bed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/b62ccf4a/attachment.pgp>
eer?
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/0be0d4be/attachment.pgp>
" is way way way below the bar
> needed to justify incorporating the functionality into the same app.
Maybe we should call a ceasefire for the time being, and I'll bug you all
again about it in 0.8 when we have passive requests, transport plugins, and
maybe new load management?
>
> Ian.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/caf6c2d0/attachment.pgp>
ly with this, admittedly with an absolutely
horrible latency, which would be cut to a moderately horrible latency with
true passive requests).
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signa
sh/subscribe systems fairly efficiently.
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/3fb2624e/attachment.pgp>
d...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/9106f1a3/attachment.pgp>
s scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/f2fb54bd/attachment.pgp>
important?
Yeah but we'd have to unpack, support post-unpack scripts, etc etc ... really
we'd want the apps to provide their own unpacker and just feed them a single
file for them to do what they want with?
>
> Regards,
> Victor Denisov.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/f2126e45/attachment.pgp>
to lost any data in this early testing stage.
Ahh, okay.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/387cbc86/attachment.pgp>
--- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/50223105/attachment.pgp>
ort completely separate identities which can't be
easily linked together, just as Frost did.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/fd6bf4ff/attachment.pgp>
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Michael T?nzer
wrote:
> I don't think funding depends on how our website looks, at least not
> directly
Not directly, but definitely indirectly. Funding is proportional to
the number of users, and the number of users is proportional to the
number of people
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40% conversion
> rate - that is, 40% of our unique visitors downloaded Freenet.
Firstly, I don't buy that stat, and secondly, the inference you draw
from it is wrong.
I
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> > It could be related to the fact that I've only been able to dedicate
> > about 2 Gb for my store, but I doubt it.
>
> That certainly won't help.
What evidence is there that people need to have multi-gigabyte
datastores? We aren't
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Sunday 11 May 2008 10:03, Daniel Cheng wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Here are the Chinese translation for cont-close-me and welcome.html
>
> Great stuff. A full chinese translation would be wonderful, however I prefer
> you work on code if
vhost right-now and delete it?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/93143d5b/attachment.pgp>
xt attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/89167f44/attachment.pgp>
ant, is
it ?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080513/70ece08d/attachment.pgp>
Evan Daniel wrote:
> The major change needed would be a way to request not the specific SSK
> block, but the SSK, whatever CHK it happens to redirect to, and any
> CHK blocks needed to decode the result
Exactly, so you'd need a different protocol, different data formats and
a different routing
Matthew Toseland wrote:
>> 1. The platform for this type of thing is a small mobile device,
>> getting Freenet to work well on an iPhone would be a world of pain -
>> and doesn't buy anything for us
>
> No, to do that requires a massive amount of short range bandwidth. Phones do
> not have this.
Evan Daniel wrote:
> I think flood routing inserts opportunistically is a good idea --
> there's no point in sending out a memory card less than full, and
> routed requests / inserts may well not be enough to fill it.
My knee-jerk reaction was "flooding doesn't scale", but it's actually
worked
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Florent Daigni?re
wrote:
> Well what's the solution then? To make Matthew work on the website? to
> send a call for help on @announce (possibly a better phrased than mine)?
>
> Shall I forget about the drupal vhost right-now and delete it?
Definitely not, its
Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Hence request priorities, so that the requests for the top blocks go over the
> UDP connections.
Are you assuming that every sneakernet connection will be backed up by
an internet connection?
> So the routing code
> could be very similar to the current code, but we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| On Friday 09 May 2008 07:27, Victor Denisov wrote:
|> | Automatic bandwidth calibration. Other p2p apps have this, we should
|> have it.
|>
|> Good idea. Also, we should definitely look into better utilizing
|> available bandwidth. Freenet's the
Victor Denisov wrote:
> Input Rate: 17.6 KiB/sec (of 300 KiB)
> Output Rate: 15.9 KiB/sec (of 200 KiB)
> Total Input: 4.83 GiB (28.3 KiB/sec)
> Total Output: 5.66 GiB (33.2 KiB/sec)
>
> Used Java memory: 122 MiB
> Allocated Java memory: 127 MiB
> Maximum Java memory: 284 MiB
> Running threads:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Florent Daigni?re
wrote:
> I personnaly won't work on it for now. The main point against our
> current website is that it's not community-friendly... Let's see if the
> community feels involved and will contribute to the presumably
> community-friendly
On Monday 12 May 2008 18:14, you wrote:
Hi,
I'm having interrogations about the use of the WoT plugin and I'm
confronted to a choice :
The plugin is able to handle multiple local identites. But do you think
it could be usefull to allow local identities to set different trust
levels on
On Monday 12 May 2008 20:05, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
When you publish a shared trust tree with 2 identities, everyone could
easily figure
out that this two identities are the same person.
I wasn't thinking about sharing the same trustlist but : the first
On Saturday 10 May 2008 04:10, Daniel Cheng wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 6:24 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 06 May 2008 08:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: j16sdiz
Date: 2008-05-06 07:39:43 + (Tue, 06 May 2008)
New Revision: 19789
Modified:
On Monday 12 May 2008 20:19, Victor Denisov wrote:
| On Friday 09 May 2008 07:27, Victor Denisov wrote:
| | Automatic bandwidth calibration. Other p2p apps have this, we should
| have it.
|
| Good idea. Also, we should definitely look into better utilizing
| available bandwidth. Freenet's
On Monday 12 May 2008 23:10, Michael Rogers wrote:
Victor Denisov wrote:
Input Rate: 17.6 KiB/sec (of 300 KiB)
Output Rate: 15.9 KiB/sec (of 200 KiB)
Total Input: 4.83 GiB (28.3 KiB/sec)
Total Output: 5.66 GiB (33.2 KiB/sec)
Used Java memory: 122 MiB
Allocated Java memory: 127 MiB
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 05:44, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well what's the solution then? To make Matthew work on the website? to
send a call for help on @announce (possibly a better phrased than mine)?
Shall I forget
On Monday 12 May 2008 23:28, Michael Rogers wrote:
Matthew Toseland wrote:
Hence request priorities, so that the requests for the top blocks go over
the
UDP connections.
Are you assuming that every sneakernet connection will be backed up by
an internet connection?
No, it's merely an
On Monday 12 May 2008 23:56, Michael Rogers wrote:
Matthew Toseland wrote:
1. The platform for this type of thing is a small mobile device,
getting Freenet to work well on an iPhone would be a world of pain -
and doesn't buy anything for us
No, to do that requires a massive amount of
On Monday 12 May 2008 23:56, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 10 May 2008 17:33, Ian Clarke wrote:
I see a simple scenario where a sneakernet would be useful is in a
situation like Burma or Tibet where stuff is
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It could be related to the fact that I've only been able to dedicate
about 2 Gb for my store, but I doubt it.
That certainly won't help.
What evidence is there that people need to have multi-gigabyte
datastores?
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 00:44, Michael Rogers wrote:
Evan Daniel wrote:
The major change needed would be a way to request not the specific SSK
block, but the SSK, whatever CHK it happens to redirect to, and any
CHK blocks needed to decode the result
Exactly, so you'd need a different
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 00:24, Evan Daniel wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Matthew Toseland
2. Most or all Freenet apps assume a few seconds latency on requests
(Frost, Fproxy, etc), yet the latency with the
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40% conversion
rate - that is, 40% of our unique visitors downloaded Freenet.
Firstly, I don't buy that stat, and secondly, the inference you draw
from it is
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 19:38, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It could be related to the fact that I've only been able to dedicate
about 2 Gb for my store, but I doubt it.
That certainly won't help.
What evidence is
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 19:45, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40%
conversion
rate - that is, 40% of our unique visitors downloaded Freenet.
Firstly, I don't buy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| What evidence is there that people need to have multi-gigabyte
| datastores? We aren't necessarily helping ourselves by telling people
| they need to devote anywhere from 1-5% of their total hard disks to
| Freenet, unless it *really is* necessary.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| I disagree. Your actual bandwidth usage is determined by how many
requests the
| other nodes send you. This is largely determined by the *average
bandwidth
| limit* across the whole network. If we increase the average bandwidth
limit,
| we increase
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 05:44, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well what's the solution then? To make Matthew work on the website? to
send a call for help on @announce (possibly a better phrased than
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Michael Tänzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think funding depends on how our website looks, at least not
directly
Not directly, but definitely indirectly. Funding is proportional to
the number of users, and the number of users is proportional to the
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 20:40, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Michael Tänzer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think funding depends on how our website looks, at least not
directly
Not directly, but definitely indirectly. Funding is proportional to
the number of
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 20:30, Michael Tänzer wrote:
Matthew Toseland schrieb:
IMHO the bigger problem is user retention. And how do we get better user
retention?
- More content.
- Better performance.
- A usable chat client. (Whether or not we choose to spend project
resources
on
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 4:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dbkr
Date: 2008-05-13 20:45:14 + (Tue, 13 May 2008)
New Revision: 19918
Added:
trunk/freenet/test/freenet/crypt/ciphers/
trunk/freenet/test/freenet/crypt/ciphers/RijndaelTest.java
Removed:
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-13 19:50:38]:
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 19:45, Ian Clarke wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40%
conversion
rate - that is, 40% of
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-13 16:11:59]:
Author: j16sdiz
Date: 2008-05-13 16:11:59 + (Tue, 13 May 2008)
New Revision: 19914
Added:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/ciphers/RijndaelTest.java
Log:
JUnit for Rijndael
Added:
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-13 13:45:18]:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40% conversion
rate - that is, 40% of our unique visitors downloaded Freenet.
Firstly, I don't
On 5/14/08, Florent Daignière [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-13 16:11:59]:
Author: j16sdiz
Date: 2008-05-13 16:11:59 + (Tue, 13 May 2008)
New Revision: 19914
Added:
trunk/freenet/src/freenet/crypt/ciphers/RijndaelTest.java
Log:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Florent Daignière
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-13 13:45:18]:
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Matthew Toseland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As nextgens pointed out recently, our current website has a 40%
conversion
59 matches
Mail list logo
