On 2012-01-02 00:14, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, January 01, 2012 15:35:00 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Ok, if you would rather have all this in the language I would say no do
that. But I know other people in the community that usually prefer to do
a library solution if possible.
If all we're
On 2012-01-02 00:28, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, January 01, 2012 15:31:18 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
What's wrong with being able to run the unit tests from your editor,
have the unit test framework output HTML (or similar), displayed in your
editor and then you can click on links in the stac
On Sunday, January 01, 2012 15:31:18 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> What's wrong with being able to run the unit tests from your editor,
> have the unit test framework output HTML (or similar), displayed in your
> editor and then you can click on links in the stack trace to get to the
> source code. If yo
On Sunday, January 01, 2012 15:32:34 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2011-12-31 21:57, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 31, 2011 15:48:16 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> >> Yes but what happens when there are many failed tests, i.e. may
> >> AssertErrors that have been thrown? It will just prin
On Sunday, January 01, 2012 15:35:00 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> Ok, if you would rather have all this in the language I would say no do
> that. But I know other people in the community that usually prefer to do
> a library solution if possible.
If all we're talking about is named unit tests and runni
On 2012-01-01 01:57, Andrew Wiley wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 16:06:49 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-12-31 11:37, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 11:05:58 Tobias Pankrath wrote:
I think that the AssertE
On 2011-12-31 22:01, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 16:04:12 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
It would be possible to implement named unit tests only in library code.
It would not have as nice syntax as if it was implemented in the
language but still possible.
In Ruby on Rails I ru
On 2011-12-31 21:57, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 15:48:16 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Yes but what happens when there are many failed tests, i.e. may
AssertErrors that have been thrown? It will just print all after each
other and you have to count them yourself if you want t
On 2011-12-31 21:56, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 16:06:49 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
BTW, what would be so wrong if the unit tests for the standard library
displayed a nice report when finished?
My primary issue here is that I don't think that we should be adding stuff to
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> I think
> that on some level, the unit test framework in the language has failed if
> we have to add library solutions on top of it to get such basic
> functionality.
That's what we are saying: The unit test framework fails for us and a
library solution is perfectly pos
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 18:57:14 Andrew Wiley wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 31, 2011 16:06:49 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> >> On 2011-12-31 11:37, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >> > On Saturday, December 31, 2011 11:05:58 Tobias Pankrath
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Saturday, December 31, 2011 16:06:49 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2011-12-31 11:37, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>> > On Saturday, December 31, 2011 11:05:58 Tobias Pankrath wrote:
>> >>> I think that the AssertError's message (which includes
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 16:04:12 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> It would be possible to implement named unit tests only in library code.
> It would not have as nice syntax as if it was implemented in the
> language but still possible.
>
> In Ruby on Rails I run single unit tests all the time. Why
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 15:48:16 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> Yes but what happens when there are many failed tests, i.e. may
> AssertErrors that have been thrown? It will just print all after each
> other and you have to count them yourself if you want to know how many
> failed tests there are?
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 16:06:49 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2011-12-31 11:37, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Saturday, December 31, 2011 11:05:58 Tobias Pankrath wrote:
> >>> I think that the AssertError's message (which includes the file and
> >>> line number of the failure) and its stack t
On 2011-12-31 11:37, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 11:05:58 Tobias Pankrath wrote:
I think that the AssertError's message (which includes the file and line
number of the failure) and its stack trace are plenty. It's exactly what
you need and nothing else.
- Jonathan M D
On 2011-12-31 11:37, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 11:05:58 Tobias Pankrath wrote:
I think that the AssertError's message (which includes the file and line
number of the failure) and its stack trace are plenty. It's exactly what
you need and nothing else.
- Jonathan M D
On 2011-12-31 04:35, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2011 21:38:07 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-12-30 19:49, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2011 13:41:37 Tobias Pankrath wrote:
I really think it is and will use one for my D code. Since both worlds
could live t
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Saturday, December 31, 2011 11:05:58 Tobias Pankrath wrote:
>> > I think that the AssertError's message (which includes the file and
>> > line number of the failure) and its stack trace are plenty. It's
>> > exactly what you need and nothing else.
>> >
>> > - Jonathan
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 11:05:58 Tobias Pankrath wrote:
> > I think that the AssertError's message (which includes the file and line
> > number of the failure) and its stack trace are plenty. It's exactly what
> > you need and nothing else.
> >
> > - Jonathan M Davis
>
> I want to have suc
>
> I think that the AssertError's message (which includes the file and line
> number of the failure) and its stack trace are plenty. It's exactly what
> you need and nothing else.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
I want to have such a summary. What's about running only certain unittests?
On Friday, December 30, 2011 21:38:07 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2011-12-30 19:49, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > On Friday, December 30, 2011 13:41:37 Tobias Pankrath wrote:
> >> I really think it is and will use one for my D code. Since both worlds
> >> could live together peacefully there is absolu
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 22:25:07 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 12/2/11 10:26 PM, dsimcha wrote:
I volunteered ages ago to manage the review for the second
round of
Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper. After the first round it was
decided that,
after a large number of minor issues
On 2011-12-30 19:49, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Friday, December 30, 2011 13:41:37 Tobias Pankrath wrote:
I really think it is and will use one for my D code. Since both worlds
could live together peacefully there is absolutely no reason not to include
one in phobos.
It's one thing to use a fa
On Monday, 19 December 2011 at 18:14:29 UTC, Somedude wrote:
Le 19/12/2011 19:05, Somedude a écrit :
Le 03/12/2011 05:26, dsimcha a écrit :
I volunteered ages ago to manage the review for the second
round of
Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper. After the first round it was
decided
that, af
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 20:01:04 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
The docs for onReceiveHeader,
http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl.html#onReceiveHeader
explicitly says that the const string parameters are not valid
after the function returns. This is all well and good; but a
On Friday, December 30, 2011 13:41:37 Tobias Pankrath wrote:
> When I first came to D, I read "unittest support" and thought that would
> be nice. But after I tried it, I realized it sucks and wrote something
> similar to Jacobs unittest framework.
>
> > I'm against it. I think that the compiler/r
copy.clear(option);
You should be able to cut down on the number of lines by doing
that (_especially_ if you're actually clearing all of them and
can use EnumMembers!CurlOption).
Nice.
I actually found out that you can do:
with (CurlOption)
foreach(option; TypeTuple!(file, writefunction
When I first came to D, I read "unittest support" and thought that would
be nice. But after I tried it, I realized it sucks and wrote something
similar to Jacobs unittest framework.
> I'm against it. I think that the compiler/runtime should be fixed so that
> each unit test block is run in a modu
On 2011-12-29 13:59, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Thursday, 29 December 2011 at 12:49:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
For example:
import orange.test.UnitTester;
int sum (int x, int y)
{
return x * y;
}
unittest ()
{
describe("sum") in {
it("should return the sum of the two given arguments") in {
asse
On Thursday, 29 December 2011 at 12:49:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
For example:
import orange.test.UnitTester;
int sum (int x, int y)
{
return x * y;
}
unittest ()
{
describe("sum") in {
it("should return the sum of the two given arguments")
in {
assert(sum(1, 2)
On 2011-12-27 03:01, dsimcha wrote:
By a vote of 14-0, Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper (std.net.curl) has been
accepted into Phobos. Thanks to Jonas for his hard work and his
persistence through the multiple rounds of review that it took to get
this module up to Phobos's high and increasi
On 2011-12-29 06:11, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 23:07:51 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I think it is, don't know what others think. What it does is it catches
AssertErrors so other unit tests can continue to run and then gives a
nice report at the end.
I'm against it. I th
On Wednesday, 28 December 2011 at 22:21:09 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2011-12-28 22:19, jdrewsen wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 December 2011 at 16:01:50 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2011-12-27 03:01, dsimcha wrote:
By a vote of 14-0, Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper
(std.net.curl) has been
acc
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 00:06:57 Brad Anderson wrote:
> Forgive me if this is a silly question but a conversation in IRC got me
> wondering if compiler could check for shared/__gshared use (and any other
> thread unsafe operation) in each unittest and run those that aren't using
> them concu
On Thursday, 29 December 2011 at 07:07:10 UTC, Brad Anderson
wrote:
Forgive me if this is a silly question but a conversation in
IRC got me
wondering if compiler could check for shared/__gshared use (and
any other
thread unsafe operation) in each unittest and run those that
aren't using
them co
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 23:07:51 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> > I think it is, don't know what others think. What it does is it catches
> > AssertErrors so other unit tests can continue to run and then gives a
> > nice report at the en
On Wednesday, December 28, 2011 23:07:51 Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> I think it is, don't know what others think. What it does is it catches
> AssertErrors so other unit tests can continue to run and then gives a
> nice report at the end.
I'm against it. I think that the compiler/runtime should be fix
On 2011-12-28 22:19, jdrewsen wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 December 2011 at 16:01:50 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-12-27 03:01, dsimcha wrote:
By a vote of 14-0, Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper (std.net.curl) has been
accepted into Phobos. Thanks to Jonas for his hard work and his
persis
On 2011-12-28 19:43, dsimcha wrote:
On Wednesday, 28 December 2011 at 16:01:50 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Running the unit tests:
./unittest.sh
Use "make" to compile the library or create an executable using rdmd.
A few things to think about that need to be resolved:
* This is quite a large l
On Wednesday, 28 December 2011 at 16:01:50 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2011-12-27 03:01, dsimcha wrote:
By a vote of 14-0, Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper (std.net.curl)
has been
accepted into Phobos. Thanks to Jonas for his hard work and his
persistence through the multiple rounds of r
On Wednesday, 28 December 2011 at 16:01:50 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
Running the unit tests:
./unittest.sh
Use "make" to compile the library or create an executable using
rdmd.
A few things to think about that need to be resolved:
* This is quite a large library and I really don't want to p
On 2011-12-27 03:01, dsimcha wrote:
By a vote of 14-0, Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper (std.net.curl) has been
accepted into Phobos. Thanks to Jonas for his hard work and his
persistence through the multiple rounds of review that it took to get
this module up to Phobos's high and increasi
On Tuesday, 27 December 2011 at 02:01:51 UTC, dsimcha wrote:
By a vote of 14-0, Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper (std.net.curl)
has been accepted into Phobos. Thanks to Jonas for his hard
work and his persistence through the multiple rounds of review
that it took to get this module up to Pho
By a vote of 14-0, Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper (std.net.curl)
has been accepted into Phobos. Thanks to Jonas for his hard work
and his persistence through the multiple rounds of review that it
took to get this module up to Phobos's high and increasing
quality standard.
Keep the
Yes.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 20, 2011, at 1:49 AM, "Bernard Helyer" wrote:
> Yes.
Yes!
Masahiro
On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 04:36:15 +0900, dsimcha wrote:
The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
wrapper in Phobos.
Code: https://github.com/jcd/phobos/blob/curl-wrapper/etc/curl.d
Docs: http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl.html
Yes.
Le 19/12/2011 19:05, Somedude a écrit :
> Le 03/12/2011 05:26, dsimcha a écrit :
>> I volunteered ages ago to manage the review for the second round of
>> Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper. After the first round it was decided
>> that, after a large number of minor issues
Le 03/12/2011 05:26, dsimcha a écrit :
> I volunteered ages ago to manage the review for the second round of
> Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper. After the first round it was decided
> that, after a large number of minor issues were fixed, a second round
> would be necessary.
>
On Sunday, December 18, 2011 21:49:16 jdrewsen wrote:
> A static ternary operator wouldn't work in this case since
> isFtpUrl(url) cannot be evaluated at compile time.
Ah. That would be true. Still, it's the sort of thing which begs for a ternary
operator but which just can't use it due to techni
On Sunday, 18 December 2011 at 01:27:45 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 23:10:00 jdrewsen wrote:
On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 08:51:29 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> Line# 235 is identical to line# 239. Shouldn't line# 235 be
> creating an Http object, not an Ftp
Yes.
--
Mike Wey
On 17/12/2011 19:36, dsimcha wrote:
The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
wrapper in Phobos.
Code: https://github.com/jcd/phobos/blob/curl-wrapper/etc/curl.d
Docs: http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl.html
For those of you on Windows, a li
On Sunday, 18 December 2011 at 01:30:10 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 09:21:42 Justin C Calvarese
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:56 AM, jdrewsen
wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 07:46:56 UTC, Jonathan M
> Davis wrote:
>>> ...
>
> I'd argue that the ac
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 14:36:15 dsimcha wrote:
> The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
> wrapper in Phobos.
>
>
> Code: https://github.com/jcd/phobos/blob/curl-wrapper/etc/curl.d
> Docs: http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/et
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 09:21:42 Justin C Calvarese wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:56 AM, jdrewsen wrote:
> > On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 07:46:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >>> ...
> >
> > I'd argue that the acronyms should be in all caps if camelcasing would
> >
> >> req
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 23:51:08 Jakob Ovrum wrote:
> On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 22:25:10 UTC, jdrewsen wrote:
> > On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 20:38:46 UTC, Jakob Ovrum
> >
> > wrote:
> >> On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 11:56:04 UTC, jdrewsen wrote:
> >>> AutoConnect sounds lik
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 23:10:00 jdrewsen wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 08:51:29 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Line# 235 is identical to line# 239. Shouldn't line# 235 be
> > creating an Http object, not an Ftp object? That mistake
> > definitely makes it look like downlo
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 12:56:02 jdrewsen wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 07:46:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> > I'd argue that the acronyms should be in all caps if
> > camelcasing would require that the first letter of the acronym
> > be capitalized and all lower case if camelcasi
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:36:15 -0500, dsimcha wrote:
> The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
> wrapper in Phobos.
>
>
> Code: https://github.com/jcd/phobos/blob/curl-wrapper/etc/curl.d Docs:
> http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl
YES!
Finally an easy way to do SMTP.
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 22:25:10 UTC, jdrewsen wrote:
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 20:38:46 UTC, Jakob Ovrum
wrote:
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 11:56:04 UTC, jdrewsen wrote:
AutoConnect sounds like a command to connection automatically
which might be confusing since that is no
yes
On 12/17/11 1:36 PM, dsimcha wrote:
The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
wrapper in Phobos.
Code: https://github.com/jcd/phobos/blob/curl-wrapper/etc/curl.d
Docs: http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl.html
For those of you on Windows, a li
Yes
On 12/2/11 10:26 PM, dsimcha wrote:
I volunteered ages ago to manage the review for the second round of
Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper. After the first round it was decided that,
after a large number of minor issues were fixed, a second round would be
necessary.
Significant open issue
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 20:38:46 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 11:56:04 UTC, jdrewsen wrote:
AutoConnect sounds like a command to connection automatically
which might be confusing since that is not what it does.
Therefore I went with AutoConnection which I st
On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 08:51:29 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Line# 235 is identical to line# 239. Shouldn't line# 235 be
creating an Http object, not an Ftp object? That mistake
definitely makes it look like download hasn't been properly
tested.
It has been tested as you can see by
The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
wrapper in Phobos.
yes.
On 2011-12-17 22:36:15 +0300, dsimcha said:
The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
wrapper in Phobos.
Code: https://github.com/jcd/phobos/blob/curl-wrapper/etc/curl.d
Docs: http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl.html
For those of you on Windo
On Saturday, 17 December 2011 at 11:56:04 UTC, jdrewsen wrote:
AutoConnect sounds like a command to connection automatically
which might be confusing since that is not what it does.
Therefore I went with AutoConnection which I still believe is
better.
How about something completely different
The docs for onReceiveHeader,
http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl.html#onReceiveHeader
explicitly says that the const string parameters are not valid
after the function returns. This is all well and good; but a
minor improvement would be to change the signature to:
@property
On 12/17/2011 2:36 PM, dsimcha wrote:
The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
wrapper in Phobos.
Code: https://github.com/jcd/phobos/blob/curl-wrapper/etc/curl.d
Docs: http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl.html
For those of you on Windows, a li
The time has come to vote on the inclusion of Jonas Drewsen's CURL
wrapper in Phobos.
Code: https://github.com/jcd/phobos/blob/curl-wrapper/etc/curl.d
Docs: http://freeze.steamwinter.com/D/web/phobos/etc_curl.html
For those of you on Windows, a libcurl binary built by DMC is availabl
== Quote from jdrewsen (jdrew...@nospam.com)'s article
> On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 07:46:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> wrote:
...
> > I'd argue that the acronyms should be in all caps if
> > camelcasing would require that the first letter of the acronym
> > be capitalized and all lower case if
== Quote from jdrewsen (jdrew...@nospam.com)'s article
> On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 07:46:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> wrote:
...
> > I'd argue that the acronyms should be in all caps if
> > camelcasing would require that the first letter of the acronym
> > be capitalized and all lower case if
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:56 AM, jdrewsen wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 07:46:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
>>
>>> ...
>
> I'd argue that the acronyms should be in all caps if camelcasing would
>> require that the first letter of the acronym be capitalized and all lower
>> case
On Thursday, 15 December 2011 at 07:46:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Friday, December 02, 2011 23:26:10 dsimcha wrote:
I volunteered ages ago to manage the review for the second
round of
Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper. After the first round it was
decided
that, after a large numb
Please make sure that you remove trailing whitespace from the file. A lot of
the lines have trailing whitespace. Also, make sure that you don't have any
tabs in the file. There are a few places where you used tabs.
Line# 916 claims that the code there won't work and that it needs to be fixed,
s
Line# 235 is identical to line# 239. Shouldn't line# 235 be creating an Http
object, not an Ftp object? That mistake definitely makes it look like download
hasn't been properly tested.
You should create template similar to
template isCurlConn(Conn)
{
auto isCurlConn = is(Conn : Http) || is(
On Monday, December 12, 2011 01:53:13 dsimcha wrote:
> Actually, that leads to another question: Should this module
> really be named etc.curl/std.curl/std.net.curl, or should the
> fact that it currently uses Curl as a backend be relegated to an
> implementation detail?
It's too specific to curl
On Friday, December 02, 2011 23:26:10 dsimcha wrote:
> I volunteered ages ago to manage the review for the second round of
> Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper. After the first round it was decided
> that, after a large number of minor issues were fixed, a second round
> w
On Tuesday, 13 December 2011 at 00:47:26 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On 12/12/11 1:18 PM, jdrewsen wrote:
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 10:26:52 UTC, Somedude wrote:
Just an idea: would it be possible/useful to use the
signals/slots
mechanism for this kind of synch ?
This would be most usef
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 14:42:17 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 12/12/11 6:25 AM, jdrewsen wrote:
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 01:05:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, December 11, 2011 19:55:28 dsimcha wrote:
On 12/11/2011 7:53 PM, dsimcha wrote:
> Should the protocol det
On Tuesday, 13 December 2011 at 00:47:26 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
I don't know if you already have a solution in the works, but
maybe the future interface I did for Thrift is similar to what
you are looking for:
http://klickverbot.at/code/gsoc/thrift/docs/thrift.util.future.html
David
Do
On 12/12/11 1:18 PM, jdrewsen wrote:
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 10:26:52 UTC, Somedude wrote:
Just an idea: would it be possible/useful to use the signals/slots
mechanism for this kind of synch ?
This would be most useful if there were some kind of main loop. This is
needed because the req
On 12/12/11 6:25 AM, jdrewsen wrote:
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 01:05:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, December 11, 2011 19:55:28 dsimcha wrote:
On 12/11/2011 7:53 PM, dsimcha wrote:
> Should the protocol detection be case-insensitive, i.e. > "ftp://"; ==
> "FTP://"?
Oh, one more
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 12:24:26 UTC, jdrewsen wrote:
I think it should have curl in the name. I do not believe that
a native D network library should have the same API as this
module. It is limited by the design of libcurl and should be
improved by a native D net library.
I agree with
On 2011-12-12 01:53, dsimcha wrote:
Here's my review. Remember, review ends on December 16.
What is the use case for exposing struct Curl? I prefer if this were
unexposed because we'll obviously be unable to provide a replacement
if/when the backend to this library is rewritten in pure D.
Actua
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 01:05:25 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Sunday, December 11, 2011 19:55:28 dsimcha wrote:
On 12/11/2011 7:53 PM, dsimcha wrote:
> Should the protocol detection be case-insensitive, i.e.
> "ftp://"; ==
> "FTP://"?
Oh, one more thing: Factor the protocol detecti
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 00:53:14 UTC, dsimcha wrote:
Here's my review. Remember, review ends on December 16.
Overall, this library has massively improved due to the rounds
of review it's been put through. I only found a few minor
nitpicks.
However, a recurring pattern is minor grammar
On Monday, 12 December 2011 at 10:26:52 UTC, Somedude wrote:
Le 05/12/2011 22:36, Jonas Drewsen a écrit :
Anyway - I _have_ said that I will add a data availability poll
functionality so I guess your initial concern is also covered.
/Jonas
Just an idea: would it be possible/useful to use the
Somedude:
> > 1. Should libcurl be bundled with DMD on Windows?
>
> Yes. This is a must.
I agree it's better to have this battery included.
Bye,
bearophile
Le 03/12/2011 05:26, dsimcha a écrit :
> I volunteered ages ago to manage the review for the second round of
> Jonas Drewsen's CURL wrapper. After the first round it was decided
> that, after a large number of minor issues were fixed, a second round
> would be necessary.
>
Le 12/12/2011 01:53, dsimcha a écrit :
> Actually, that leads to another question: Should this module really be
> named etc.curl/std.curl/std.net.curl, or should the fact that it
> currently uses Curl as a backend be relegated to an implementation detail?
>
I think it's good to remind that this
Le 05/12/2011 22:36, Jonas Drewsen a écrit :
>
> Anyway - I _have_ said that I will add a data availability poll
> functionality so I guess your initial concern is also covered.
>
> /Jonas
Just an idea: would it be possible/useful to use the signals/slots
mechanism for this kind of synch ?
On Sunday, December 11, 2011 19:55:28 dsimcha wrote:
> On 12/11/2011 7:53 PM, dsimcha wrote:
> > Should the protocol detection be case-insensitive, i.e. "ftp://"; ==
> > "FTP://"?
>
> Oh, one more thing: Factor the protocol detection out into a function.
> You have the same expression cut and p
On 12/11/2011 7:53 PM, dsimcha wrote:
Should the protocol detection be case-insensitive, i.e. "ftp://"; ==
"FTP://"?
Oh, one more thing: Factor the protocol detection out into a function.
You have the same expression cut and pasted everywhere:
if(url.startsWith("ftp://";) || url.startsWith
Here's my review. Remember, review ends on December 16.
Overall, this library has massively improved due to the rounds of
review it's been put through. I only found a few minor nitpicks.
However, a recurring pattern is minor grammar mistakes in the
documentation. Please proofread all docum
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
