--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Sholto Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It can also clog up our bands.
>
> For instance I am monitoring a Pactor 2 transmission on 30m that has
been on
> going for around 25 minutes so far and the latest email to go
through is
> titled:
>
>
> Do we
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Brabham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I tried it out, but had trouble with the audio not driving the
waterfall
> display sufficiently to function.
You have to fiddle with a couple of numbers at the bottom of the window.
Just to the left of the QSY
This seems like a good time to mention the late Bob
Weitbrecht, W6NRM. He was for all practical purposes
totally deaf, but was able to copy CW. I never knew
if he had just enough hearing at one frequency to
hear the tone or if he felt the vibrations on the
headphones on his head. Anyway, at an e
Around 2045Z Friday the 30th
Freq. 14076+1750
Mostly a steady tone, with several "clicks" per second, the
clicks being probably PSK transitions.
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "vk2eta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here is the wiki page below. Follow the download link on the left.
>
> You will get access to two download mirrors. They include the source
> and installation instructions as well if you already have linux
> running.
>
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rein Couperus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need pskmail version 0.5.4 to enjoy PSK250 arq.
> http://pa0r.blogspirit.com
>
Where do you get this version if you just want the sources for
Linux, rather than Puppy or Windows? I googled for it and got
one page w
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think that I have mentioned some of this before, but unless you
have a
> club of some kind where interested hams join and "buy in" to a concept,
> a numbering system may not be something that many will gravitate toward.
I
Why do you tell us where to get it?
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are very correct that Clover II was not a very good mode,
especially
> considering the price, since it was only a bit faster than Pactor I and
> perhaps similar in ability to operate in weak signals.
Yet I have one frien
I haven't looked at the picture but will mention
that a signal from a switching regulator power
supply can look a lot like PSK. The carrier is
a multiple of the switching frequency and is
phase modulated at a 120 Hz rate.
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know the approximate bandwidth for
> injected audio tone high speed CW? Is there a way
> to calculate this?
>
What speed do you have in mind? The word PARIS used
as a standard for measuring words per minute co
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "w6lqr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If there is text left to be transmitted, the program will send all
> except the last word, no matter how long or short the message may be,
> until I hit "Enter" again.
I imagine this is intentional on the part of the pro
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> What are the common RTTY configurations? I ask because I am in the
middle of porting / rewriting the fldigi RTTY code but have never used
RTTY myself. I'm thinking about combinations of baud / shift / bits /
.
>
> Si
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "N6CRR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Spend $20 and swap out the power supply. I had a computer doing that
> and it turned out to be that. Power supplies are cheap.
>
And cheap power supplies are often prodigious RF noise generators, even
when the computer is
Or is the message volume going to die down after everybody
here has worked everybody on all bands?
The cross-cultural part of this discussion reminded
me of a broadcast by the late Alistair Cooke. He had
just read a book by a U.S. lawyer, who asserted that
the thicket of regulations in the U.S. covering
every aspect of the law had begun with the Johnson
administration and the War on Poverty. C
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rick,
>
> I hope you or someone is making a list of which modes work the best
on each band and in varying conditions
This harks back to my recent comment on Olivia - how one night I was
getting so
Just wondering if anybody here knows anything about high speed
Morse. Seems like it was used in the 1940s, maybe earlier and
later, sending Morse at speeds of 500 wpm or so. Transmission
was from punched paper tape, and reception was on ink recorders;
then operators transcribed the received mess
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the signal strength was about the same from both stations, then
there
> could be ionospheric conditions that may be affecting the GA signal.
> Olivia is generally pretty resistant to most interference and the
16/500
> mod
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "expeditionradio"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you tuned so that the phase scope is centered?
> What software are you using, and how do you have the threshold
> (squelch) set, and the allowable frequency drift?
>
> Bonnie VR2/KQ6XA
> Hong Kong, etc.
>
The
Right now I'm copying a QSO where the stations are using Olivia
16/500 on 80M. I'm in NW Arkansas, and the two stations in the QSO
are in Florida and Georgia. I'm getting solid copy on the Florida
station and extremely lousy copy on the Georgia station.
(Presumably they are getting good copy on
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Gee Rick, you mean the whole telephone system, inclulding cells were
out for
> one cut? Sounds like they need to do some backup planning at the phone
> company too.
Yep, seems like I've read of even some military
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hopefully, your problem is that simple to identify and correct.
So how did you correct it? Did you just turn off everything that
causes noise when you want to use the radio, or did you find
effective ways of filtering out the noise?
Something I don't like is that it now comes up with a lavender
background. Makes it hard to read the blue and gray buttons for
"next" and "messages" and "older"
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My main criticism of Linux is that is has horrific fonts that are not
> comparable to Windows fonts and the Linux folks try and make believe
> that this is not a problem
I'm not going to dispute your assertion, but I don't
I too have one of those that has not been turned on in quite
a while. For RTTY the sound card implementations are a lot
better, first because you can do better things with DSP, and
second because the PK-232 uses a compromise 200 Hz shift for
RTTY and AMTOR and Pactor whereas the standard shift for
Isn't somebody selling a thumb drive that is all configured so
everything runs out of it and doesn't touch the computer hard
drive? Seems like I was reading about a product like this that
was to make it safe to use a public computer for your private
work.
Oh joy! A Christmas gift! I happened to be reading a computer
help newspaper column today and the writer mentioned a thing
called TweakUI available from Microsoft. So I got that, and it
referred to another thing called Windows Powertoys, also from
Microsoft. One or the other of these will let y
So it seems that just by suggesting a particular frequency for
calling someone has stirred up a bunch of digital modes
activity.
One thing I'll suggest is that maybe we don't need to QSY after
establishing a contact. Seems like you can listen on 14078.4
and if it isn't busy you can call on it, an
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Roger J. Buffington"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excepting Throb (which I have never used) I seem to find most of the
A funny story: I was showing all the digital modes to a ham new
to the territory, showing him what they sound like. So I switched
to Throb
Well I haven't solved the problem with Digipan, but the new card
seems to work just fine with MultiPSK, and also with Linux, so I
guess I will just forget about Digipan.
There is a web site that publishes sound card ratings.
http://www.pcavtech.com/soundcards/index.htm
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "cesco12342000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my thoughts (not veryfied) :
>
> You should use the max. sample rate the card is capable of.
> Normally, this is 48khz.
>
Apparently Digipan sets the rate, and it wants to set it
to something between 8000 and 1200
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> * Use the M Audit Delta Control Panel app to set the Variable Signal
Levels
> (Hardware Settings pane).
> * Set In1 to -10 (more sensitive).
> * Set Outputs to -10dBV (lower output).
Did that.
>
> On the break-out bo
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Simon Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
Thanks, I'll check the things you suggest. Where I'm at is
that it works just fine under Linux. Under Win95 it seems to
be installed, and the M Audio mixer is there, but when I
bring up a digi mode program such as D
I need help.
Since people are being told they have to upgrade to new faster
computers to run Windows Vista, I wonder if that means there will
be a lot of somewhat less capable machines available used or free
that will run Linux and earlier versions of Windows just fine.
Well it seems that for me an earlier version of MultiPSK does indeed
work under WINE. But the latest version gives this illegal access
through address zero trap over and over.
I just tried running multipsk under wine. After not finding the
volume control it put up a box that says something like it is
trying to access through 00 and then puts a mess on
the screen. What incantation are you using to get it to work?
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now if you convert this .doc file into a moderately compressed (90%)
pdf
> file, it grows to 67 K, so that is probably not a good direction.
>
That raises the question of how you converted it. You can scan a
document and con
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Which has made me wonder why so few digital hams send FAX images on the
> phone bands.
For me it's because digital=digital and FAX=analog, hi.
it seems to me is this regulation by emission designators.
If I have a black box, and FSK at RF comes out of it, who's to
say whether what is inside is a frequency-shifted oscillator or
a SSB generator being fed with FSK audio tones. Or some
frequency synthesis scheme that is able to shift betwee
There is a web site
http://www.pcavtech.com/soundcards/index.htm
that has quality comparisons on a whole bunch of sound cards.
There was the article on SDR in October 2005 QST where they
say the Delta 44 is a pretty good one to use.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dyn
I've been going through the RTTY material in some old issues of CQ
magazine. Thought some of you might be interested in the history.
At first most of the operation was in the Eastern U.S. on 2 meters
using AFSK (and I guess it was 2 meter AM, not FM in those days, as
they talk about SCR-522 and
Seems like a lot was being said on this topic recently.
The November issue of Communications of the Association
for Computing Machinery has an article on Hastily Formed
Networks that might be of interest to some of you.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other
And then right now on 20M we have a DX station, and a
cacaphony of people calling him spread over 10-15 KHz.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yaho
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "jgorman01" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure emergency communications is or should be the driver here.
>
> I don't think anyone (or at least most) would begrudge some HF
> frequencies be used for 3 kHz data during an actual emergency.
In fact it
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 09:38 PM 10/12/2006, you wrote in part:
>
> >I'm just wondering why we don't see more use of 85 or some other
> >narrower shift in amateur use.
>
>
> I think that is because there is still a lot of non computer
Back in ancient times the commercial and military used 850 Hz
shift for RTTY FSK. This was adopted by the hams as soon as
FSK was allowed in the ham bands, and in fact 850 Hz was required
by the original FCC rules. I suspect the main reason for the
very wide shift in the old days was to accomodat
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have listened some test in spanish with artificial voice reading
words. It was not too bad. The real problem is to translate voice in
symbols, in a reliable way.
>
Yes. There was that fairly recent QST articl
The current (October 2006) issue of IEEE Spectrum has an article
on another software defined radio, made by Ettus.
http://www.ettus.com which is a receive-only item.
Also an item about DRM in Europe, which may not catch on because
there are few receivers you can buy, and they are expensive, and
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jim
>
>
> You need to mute the MIC audio on your sound card. That will stop
the WinDRM
> digital signal from making it to your PC speakers and mixing with the
> decoded voice. Once it starts to decode, WinDRM will playback
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I'm monitoring 7296 USB if anyone wants to give a try.
>
I was listening at 0100Z and heard ALE tones but so far nothing on
DRM.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, kd4e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Windrm appears to only function under the proprietary
> MS version of windows. Have we exchanged one form
> of proprietary for another?
>
> Is there a compatible version for Apple and Linux?
>
It appears to be working under
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Joe Veldhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello list. I have been trying to implement support for the Contestia
> and RTTYM modes in a fairly new digimode app, fldigi (www.w1hkj.com).
>
I haven't looked yet, but you might look in the MultiPSK documentation,
s
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In 1945 the U.S. military ran long range HF communications almost
entirely on CW...today, the total amount of data throughput of WWII
would not even launch a single fighter.
>
Reminded me of a talk
Does anyone know what of Pactor I/II/III is covered by patents
versus what is proprietary information, or trade secrets? With
patents there is at least supposed to be full disclosure of how
the thing works; and patents have a limited lifetime.
Then we have talked about STANAG-xxx and MIL-STD-xxx
I see it mentioned from time to time - are there any servers one
can monitor or exchange traffic with? I don't know where/when to
look for them. It looks like the changes to gMFSK are already
included in the w1hkj gMFSK sources (but have to be enabled at
compile time).
Need a Digital mode QS
I'm still trying to understand this matter of precision timing.
Is it just that the Pactor mode allows only a very short time
for the ACK/NAK, or is there some synchronization from packet
to packet that must be maintained? Is it possible that one could
write a sound card program that could monito
I remember corresponding with someone, and it was well before 1999,
who had developed an implementation of MIL-STD-something or
STANAG-something. At the time he was still trying to get
permission from his employer to release the code publicly.
Maybe the same person and I had never heard the rest
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "kf8zn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> QUESTION: How does MMTTY compare head to head with a TNC, such as the
> DXP-38 for instance ??
There really are two questions, MMTTY compared with a DSP TNC like the
DXP-38 and compared with an all-hardware TNC like the P
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose Amador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Maybe only one modulation scheme (Layer One stuff) is
> not good enough for all situations, and different
> bands or propagation conditions may require different
> solutions. SCS boxes do it with different levels of
> P
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After giving my son the top-of-the-line but out of date
> PC,
There is a certain milestone in life that one of my friends
passed a few years ago. Through the years he had given
his outmoded computers to his kids
I can't speak to what you buy off the floor at Wal-Mart, but
I'm using one of the computers from their web site, have been
for several years now. The "Microtel" with 2.4GHz P4 and
it has a Gigabyte mother board that is ATX with a real COM port.
You could look for a used machine with a real COM po
I built a K-2 with all the addons except for the DSP audio,
and used it quite a bit for digital modes. There were some
problems with frequency drift in some modes. e.g. in PSK
if the receiver uses AFC there was no problem, but in MFSK
it would drift more than the receiver software could tolerate.
I'm willing to believe that the timing tolerances in -tor modes
are so tight that ordinary PC operating systems cannot cope with
them the way a dedicated processor can. What I don't understand
is why the tolerances need to be so tight. The transmitter sends
a packet and then listens for an ACK o
That should work fine. As a matter of academic curiosity,
what kind of TNC are they using in MARS these days?
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://group
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Harold Aaron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi. Would be interested to hear if you are using any isolation when you
> pick off audio from the ACC connector that feeds the soundcard, TNC and
> other modem.
I have not found it necessary to use isolation when tak
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "jerryrp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a Rascal interface that uses the mike plug and ext speaker
> conection to inferace the radio with my rascal. My question is it
> better to use the ACC plug in the rear of the radio to interface to the
> radio?
The
I don't know offhand. I googled for "software defined radio"
and kit and came up with, among 39,000 other things, the
SoftRock-40 - but that looks a little different from what
my friend has. But I think it came from one of the QRP
equipment suppliers. His was on two little PC boards.
A few quibbles. Accuracy is a more-or-less thing. I used
RTTY a lot back in the late 1950s, and even when copy isn't
perfect you can have an enjoyable QSO because you can pretty
well make out what the other guy is saying. With somewhat
worse conditions you can't and you give up. But imperfect
c
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What's this animal sound like?
> Got a WAV file of it?
> Don't think I have run across it as yet.
Just install the software, go into transmit, and listen to what it
sounds like with the PC speaker or headphones.
For transmit only I remember there was an article in QST fairly
recently - showed an APRS locator transmitter being carried by
a dog.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/XI
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The experimental digital operators were nowhere to be found. I saw
NO ONE
> using Throb, Olivia, DominoEx, or Hell in Field Day.
I for one consider a contest weekend to be a time to avoid the radio and
play with
So there's still a lot of Clover activity? Maybe I don't listen there
enough, but then I don't hear enough to justify listening there.
All I was pointing out is that Clover is a 500 Hz wide mode and for
some reason it operates below the 14070 PSK band.
Of course on a contest weekend all band pla
Aside from what's been said recently, once upon a time there
was a lot of Clover operation in the range 14064.5-14066.5
and such. Since there is hardly any Clover anymore, why don't
we operate other digital modes down there?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Don" wrote:
> >
> > Just wondering why there is no PSK31 activity on 30 meters? Seems like
I guess it's like that restaurant that Yogi Berra talked about.
"Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded." except in this
case nobody goes there because nobody
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Vince - KB9SJT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So that's what that was... what software is available for Throb?? I
> know MixW will do it, any others?? 73's
I was using MultiPSK. There are also a couple of stand-alone Throb
programs. And gmfsk under
Just took part in a 3-way Throb QSO on 40M tonight. Been
quite a while since I have heard any Throb on the air.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, KV9U <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> value for such use. It would be surprised if many would use Pactor
> anymore for conversational use as we did years ago (and Amtor too)
> because the keyboard modes are reasonably fast for many typing speeds
> and are ofte
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew O'Brien"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Try Multipsk, it supports MT63.
I talked to someone recently who asserted that IZ8BLY MT63 works
much better than MT63 under MultiPSK. Can anyone confirm or deny?
I haven't heard enough MT63 lately to make a c
Usually when there is a contest on I turn off the radio
and go do something else until it is over. I might listen
to a DominoEX contest just for the chance to copy some
DominoEX, which seems to be extremely rare. But to
evaluate it I would want to hold a longer conversation
than the typical co
Maybe we cynics should start putting in other computer models as a joke.
How about "computer here is a PDP-8" or "computer here is IBM 704"?
(Now that one could get you into an interesting talk about power
consumption!)
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Oth
I have also encountered non-harmonic spurious tones from time to time.
First time was a friend running a TS-440 on RTTY. As RF output was
increased there would be a spurious tone come on in addition to the
AFSK he was intentionally transmitting. He was able to get rid of it
by connecting the rad
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Mel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I use Digipan to operate on BPSK31, I transmit for a couple of hours
> and then switch off the computer to have a bite to eat.
>
> When I return to the shack, I switch on the computer, load up Digipan
> and the screen show
My portable station consists of an Elecraft K-2 and its antenna
tuner and a laptop PC. The K-2 and its tuner fit into a padded
six-pack cooler bag. Another such bag holds the power supply,
PC to soundcard interface box, key, microphone, and headphones.
So that's 3 packages for the whole thing.
The number of developers of soundcard RTTY software is pretty
small, so I think it's reasonable to ask them to make software
interoperable with a mechanical TTY. K6STI was concerned
about this with his RITTY program and worked out end-of-line
processing that is satisfactory. W1HKJ has just done
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (just between you and me, maybe some day the software
> writers will fix their software so it send a CR/LF after
> 72 charters. Or the computer operators will hit the enter
> key at the end of a line and forget all about
I went to an IEEE meeting last night, where the speaker was K5XS
Bernie Skoch, Brig. Gen. USAF (retired), consultant to DOD and various
companies. He talked mostly about interoperability issues among
the main armed services, various other government agencies, and
other nations.
One of his slides
Wonder if you could put a time or a serial number in beacon
transmissions. Reason is that I am not copying all of them,
and with that additional information I could monitor for a
while and see what fracton of them I am getting.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.
I haven't spent the time getting my head around it, but I did
copy your beacon just now. Also tried a call but didn't get
anywhere.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
D
MultiPSK does CW
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Digipol (band plan policy discussion)
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit you
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "N6CRR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Any of the Linux heads reading this reflector know of a good Linux
> based sound card Packet program?
There is the thing called PSKMail, which used a modified gmfsk to do
some kind of packet-ish communication; but I haven'
I was just in an Olivia QSO on 20M and had a pactor station fire up
right on top of us and still got nearly 100% copy. I don't think you
can do that with PSK.
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yaho
In the README-hkj.txt file it says to be sure you have the hamlib
directives properly set. Where do you go to see them?
Need a Digital mode QSO? Connect to Telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
Other areas of interest:
The MixW Reflector : http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup/
DigiPol: htt
It's my understanding that DominoEX is supposed to replace DominoF.
I can't say about the others - certainly there are more modes out there
than people are using.
And then some modes I would call "archaic" but not "obsolete". Such as
Baudot RTTY - there actually seems to be an increasing number
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Tim Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There seems to be a lot of interest in doing the glamour work of handling
> emergency agency traffic but little interest in doing the grunt work of
> handling traffic for the public.
>
I'm surprised to learn there is any
WILLIAM JEX QUICKLY CAPTURED FIVE DOZEN GOOD REPUBLICANS
(A Western Union test sentence from the 1950s. Of course one might
question whether there exist as many as five dozen good Republicans,
but that would be bringing partisanship into the issue.)
Yahoo! Groups Sp
I've been maintaining the digital modes software for W5YM,
the University of Arkansas club station. Now we have a
blind member of the club, and he has trouble using the digital
modes because they are so visual - like tuning to the waterfall.
I'm wondering if people can suggest ways around the prob
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "Leigh L Klotz, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> As of now, it is unfortunately an undocumented proprietary mode in
some
> versions of MixW.
In view of that, is it even legal to use these modes? (In the U.S.)
Yahoo! Groups Sp
101 - 200 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
