Re: [ODL Discuss] [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] [TSC][Discuss] ODL Jira & Confluence Migration to Atlassian Cloud - Scheduled for August 26th

On 23/08/2024 8.54 am, Anil Belur wrote: On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 3:18 PM Michal Chochula wrote: Hello Anil, thank you for the update. But it Seems like redirects still are not working. ODL team at Pantheon is actively using and depending on content from ODL JIRA. Redirects n

Re: [ODL Discuss] [app-dev] Segment Routing + PCE + PCEP + BGP-LS support in ODL Carbon release

On 04/08/2024 5.43 pm, kals wrote: Hi Experts, Hello "__kals__", I would like to know whether *_Carbon _*release will support the following: the relevant documentation is available at https://docs.opendaylight.org/en/stable-carbon/user-guide/bgp-user-guide.html and https://docs.opendayli

Re: [ODL Discuss] Support of SFC from Opendaylight

On 17/03/2024 07.51, Thomas Jonathan Jackson wrote: Hello sir. Hello, I'd like to know why Opendaylight Stopped supporting SFC(Service Function Chaining) feature in new versions. The reason was a lack of contributors willing to keep the project alive. The project opted to not participate i

Re: Private: Re: [ODL Discuss] Is there no validation on leafrefs in opendaylight? #help

On 22/02/2024 08.35, aronbergur...@gmail.com wrote: Ah I see, I had already found this LeafRefValidation component. That is why I thought it was weird that there was no validation of the leafref in the example above. I have been diving into ODL for the past weeks, and I am really intrigued. B

Re: [ODL Discuss] Is there no validation on leafrefs in opendaylight? #help

On 21/02/2024 23.33, aronbergur...@gmail.com wrote: For example when creating a topology you can add an underlay-topology item with topology-ref to non existing topology. And ODL responds with 201 and if I fetch the topologies I can see that the topology was created even though it is referenci

Re: [ODL Discuss] L2 switch project

On 14/02/2024 16.08, David Arjona via lists.opendaylight.org wrote: Hi Everybody, Hello, Robert has taken over the Aluminum-l2switch code and has successfully submitted the "Update to work with Aluminium GA" code change. Thanks Robert! The code I am currently working on for Silicon-l2switch

Re: [ODL Discuss] L2 switch project

On 13/02/2024 19.58, Jamie G. wrote: Is it possible the container is looking for: https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.guava/guava/29.0-jre The bundle's manifest exports com.google.common.collect Guava is our core dependency and as such a single version is pulled in by infrastructure

[ODL Discuss] The road to Java 21

Hello everyone, we saw the release on a new Java LTS version in September, so it is high time we discuss its adoption. As it currently stands (odlparent-13.0.10), we are targeting Java 17 and do not execute SFT when running with Java 21. That will change with karaf-4.4.5, slated for odlpare

Re: [ODL Discuss] Gerrit verify changes

On 07/11/2023 15.45, Andrew Grimberg wrote: Greetings folks, Hello Andy, TLDR; Changes now require 2 Verify+1 votes to be submittable. One of the votes must come from the 'ODL Required GHA' user. okay, so here is a real-life problem: why doesn't the GHA action trigger for https://git.opend

Re: [ODL Discuss] https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/CONTROLLER-1911

On 05/01/2024 05.27, Roshni k k wrote: Hi Robert, Hello Roshni, We have started working on CONTROLLER-1911 - [CONTROLLER-1911] Consider using java.lang.ref.Cleaner for transactions and FileBackedOutputStreams - OpenDaylight JIRA The co

Re: [E] Re: [ODL Discuss] L2 switch project

On 12/12/2023 15.43, Sangwook Ha via lists.opendaylight.org wrote: The Maven build jobs for l2switch have been reverted to use Java 11: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/releng/builder/+/109134 So now you can verify your chang

Re: [ODL Discuss] Gerrit verify changes

On 08/11/2023 14.53, Andrew Grimberg wrote: Greetings Robert, On 11/7/23 15:47, Robert Varga wrote: [snip] And I also have an issue to report: +2/Submit Gerrit shortcut is broken. git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/c/netconf/+/108831 is fully verified and I do not have a '+2' button in

Re: [ODL Discuss] Gerrit verify changes

On 07/11/2023 19.48, Andrew Grimberg wrote: Greetings Robert, Hello Andy, [snip] So, if for some reason the GHA started failing this would require a Gerrit admin (LFRE) to disable the hard requirement that the odl.required.gha account has voted. Please note, that LFRE gets every single fa

Re: [ODL Discuss] Gerrit verify changes

On 07/11/2023 18.23, Andrew Grimberg wrote: Greetings Robert, Hello Andy, On 11/7/23 06:56, Robert Varga wrote: Hello Andy, On 07/11/2023 15.45, Andrew Grimberg wrote: This job will vote Verified+/-1 depending on the status on all changes and the vote will come in as the 'ODL Require

Re: [ODL Discuss] Gerrit verify changes

Hello Andy, On 07/11/2023 15.45, Andrew Grimberg wrote: This job will vote Verified+/-1 depending on the status on all changes and the vote will come in as the 'ODL Required.GHA' account. Gerrit has been updated to _require_ that that user has voted +1 for a change to be submittable. It also r

Re: [ODL Discuss] ODL HA feature contribution: Requesting your view on outstanding HA defects for upcoming release.

On 21/08/2023 09.18, Roshni k k via lists.opendaylight.org wrote: Hello Robert and All, Hello Roshni, welcome in our little community :) 1. I recently started joining ODL Linux Networking Community along with my colleagues @Saravanan Shanmuga Sundaram

Re: [ODL Discuss] ODL yang-tools help

sssn 17/07/2023 15.14, Paolo Pino wrote: Hi, I'm Paolo Pino, I took the liberty of contacting you via email that I retrieved on https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit. Hello Paolo, I'm trying to use yang-maven-plugin generated classes in a vanilla java project but i can't find documentation or o

Re: [ODL Discuss] L2 switch project

On 03/07/2023 17.59, David Arjona via lists.opendaylight.org wrote: Hi Daniel, Thanks for the info. I have taken a look at it and at the opendaylight/l2switch code in Github. Obviously, I don't understand a lot of it. However, I would like to start testing it, to have a better idea of how it

Re: [ODL Discuss] Opendaylight Argon: How can I manage an L2 network? #help #opendaylight-help-openflow

On 19/04/2023 08.40, ulo...@indra.es wrote: Hi David, Thanks for your help, I think it's a good start to work with ODL by defining flows, so I can tell the switch to work normal. However, I don't understand how to define a learning switch, where it is the controller or the application that le

[ODL Discuss] Java 11 support sunset

Hello everyone, As 2023.03 Argon is nearing its release, we are also nearing the End of Life date for 2022.03 Sulfur: as per the community support rules, as soon as Argon is out, Sulfur is no longer supported. Sulfur is an important milestone, as it is our JDK transition release, which suppo

Re: [ODL Discuss] Jetty version

On 07/11/2022 10:02, Michael D?rre wrote: Hi @all, we - as part of the ONAP project - are trying to migrate our code to odl chlorine-SR0 and getting some issues. The biggest one at the moment is, that by trying to register a websocket servlet we are provocating this bug here. https://github

Re: [ODL Discuss] ONAP/ODL Integration Sync

On 19/09/2022 20:55, dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: ONAP/ODL Integration Sync Team, At tomorrow's meeting, I'd like to discuss ODL integration with the ONAP London release in 1Q23. This will be similar to what we did for the ONAP Kohn release, which successfully enabled a smooth integrat

Re: [ODL Discuss] [tsc] Proposal to archive inactive projects.

On 30/09/2022 04:34, Anil Belur wrote: Hello TSC: The list of $projects (and last activity on the repo) are inactive for the last ~2 release cycles and good candidates for project archival. - l2switch: Apr, 2021 -1, this is a very useful downstream of OFP. Perhaps we may merge it with it.

Re: [ODL Discuss] [OpenDaylight TSC] Relevancy of branch locks during the release process

On 09/08/2022 15:44, Guillaume Lambert via lists.opendaylight.org wrote: Hello As discussed during the TSC meeting of 7th July , I'd like to challenge the relevancy of branch locks during releases processes. In my opinion they

Re: [ODL Discuss] The road to Java 17

On 25/04/2022 16:42, Robert Varga wrote: On 25/09/2021 00:00, Robert Varga wrote: Hello yet again, with not may replies in this thread, here is an update on where we are. With all this in picture, I believe the proper course in OpenDaylight is to have: - Sulfur (22.03) supporting both JDK11

Re: [ODL Discuss] Old RESTCONF northbound scheduled for removal

On 15/03/2022 18:44, Robert Varga wrote: On 01/12/2021 11:14, Robert Varga wrote: The tracker issue for the removal is https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETCONF-837 and the plan of action is as follows: [snip] 4. 2022.09 Chlorine, due out in September 2022, will not include the old

Re: [ODL Discuss] The road to Java 17

On 25/09/2021 00:00, Robert Varga wrote: Hello everyone, Hello again, as you might have noticed, Java 17 has been released: https://jdk.java.net/17/ with reference implementation here: https://jdk.java.net/java-se-ri/17 [snip] IIUC, there are only a few issues which prevents us from

Re: [ODL Discuss] Old RESTCONF northbound scheduled for removal

On 01/12/2021 11:14, Robert Varga wrote: The tracker issue for the removal is https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETCONF-837 and the plan of action is as follows: 1. Phosphorus SR2, due out 2022-01-27, will issue a single (mild) warning on startup. We will continue to install the

Re: [ODL Discuss] [kernel-dev] ONAP/ODL Integration Sync

a0...@gmail.com> • dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org <mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org> • Kuangching Wang • Robert Varga • onap-s...@lists.onap.org <mailto:onap-s...@lists.onap.org> • kernel-...@lists.opendaylight.org <mailto:kern

Re: [ODL Discuss] ONAP/ODL Integration Sync

. Nevertheless the content below is something to mull over before we meet next week :) I do believe it provides a very clear solution (and challenges thereto) the problem at hand... Regards, Robert David On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 11:07 AM Robert Varga <mailto:n...@hq.sk>> wrote:

[ODL Discuss] ONAP/ODL Integration Sync

So nobody attented this call today. This question raised yesterday on ONAP PTL call was the one of release timing and streamlining alignment with ODL. The one thing I failed to realize is that ODL release cycle is off-the-wack due to the major changes happening to yangtools/mdsal integration

Re: [ODL Discuss] Multiple mount points for the same device

/mitigation are always welcome. Regards, Robert Thanks, Yevgeny -Original Message- From: Robert Varga Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 7:58 AM To: Yevgeny Shakhnovich ; Miroslav Mikluš Cc: Discuss@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: Re: [ODL Discuss] Multiple mount points for the same

Re: [ODL Discuss] Mount Point Schema

On 12/01/2022 19:48, Ronald Hoang wrote: Hi, When mounting a netconf device initially there is an option to have a custom distinct schema cache for that node that is separate from the default cache/schema. You can also have multiple nodes using your distinct cache if they use the same yang

Re: [ODL Discuss] OpenDaylight having trouble parsing schema list reported by netconf get request because of augmented leaf nodes

Hello Roland, On 19/01/2022 22:05, Ronald Hoang wrote: Looking further into the source code, I found in XmlParserStream.java in yangtools to throw the exception that is causing my issue on line 566. There is a comment at the conditional statement noting that the node is unhandled and it is sti

Re: [ODL Discuss] #opendaylight #help Update archetype based project from AL SR4 to Phosphorus latest

On 11/01/2022 11:12, Zsolt Krenak wrote: Hi Robert, Hello Zsolt, everyone, Sorry, if this is a duplicate, I sent this in the morning, but I cannot see it sent so I send it again. So, the AAA version is the latest released: 0.14.7 which is most probably the problem, as this version is still

Re: [ODL Discuss] OPNFLWPLUG-1121: Log4J Bug

Hello, as a community we generally frown on private emails where general concerns are involved. I suggest you engage with (at least) discuss@lists.opendaylight.org and/or d...@lists.opendaylight.org. In relation with Log4Shell set of vulnerabilities, I have sent a few emails as to how the si

Re: [ODL Discuss] #opendaylight #help Update archetype based project from AL SR4 to Phosphorus latest

On 04/01/2022 10:17, Zsolt Krenak wrote: Hi Everyone, Hey Zsolt, I'm trying to bump our ODL version from Aluminium SR4 to Phosphorus latest due to the log4j vulnerability. Our repo is based on the generated archetype repo. I bumped all parent adn dependency versions I could find in poms to

Re: [ODL Discuss] Multiple mount points for the same device

On 13/12/2021 16:05, Yevgeny Shakhnovich wrote: Hi Miroslav, Thank you for your prompt response but I am slightly disappointed by it. I hoped that I overlooked something.  A user can create a mount point using Restconf and can modify this mount point using the same Restconf. Our application c

[ODL Discuss] Old RESTCONF northbound scheduled for removal

Hello everyone, as you might be aware, OpenDaylight ships two versions of RESTCONF northbound. The first is the all-familiar implementation of draft-bierman-netconf-restconf-02, available at localhost:8181/restconf. The second is the implementation of RFC8040, available at localhost:8181/r

Re: [ODL Discuss] Remove www-authenticate from response header. #help #opendaylight

On 29/09/2021 07:38, sachin.gu...@hsc.com wrote: Calling any RESTConf API with invalid credentials, the response returned is HTTP Status code 401 with header field "WWW-Authenticate". Consequently chrome browser displays a pop up to enter credentials. In order to avoid that pop-up, Response sh

Re: [ODL Discuss] Netconf configuration storage #opendaylight

On 10/11/2021 21:52, makuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Hello Maciej, I'm trying to build a device configuration management application using OpenDaylight and lighty.io. When I'm adding Netconf connector to the network topology I'm able (after device is succesfully connected) to read and modi

Re: [ODL Discuss] [integration-dev] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Silicon SR3 release status

On 10/11/2021 04:12, Luis Gomez wrote: The release actually happened before the other projects because TPCE does not depend anymore on MSI projects. For future, I would still recommend TPCE to wait for the TSC release approval, otherwise there is risk of having to repeat the release if for a ex

Re: [ODL Discuss] Question: Opendaylight Callhome / Keepalive

On 04/11/2021 10:45, Lena Peuker wrote: Hi together, Hello Lena, actually we try to integrate a specific network-function via callhome with opendaylight, but we struggle with a specific issue. 1. The NF triggers callhome (TCP) towards SDNC, capabilities are loaded, netconf-session is e

Re: [ODL Discuss] [E] [OpenDaylight TSC] Moderating mailinglists

om/caseylf> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:50 AM Robert Varga <mailto:n...@hq.sk>> wrote: On 21/10/2021 19:48, Ghazisaidi, Navid wrote: > Hi Robert, > > I'll take care of it. Can you send me the credentials and links to the > mailbox(es)?

Re: [ODL Discuss] Opendaylight Netconf configuration

On 22/10/2021 17:35, arne.chres...@telekom.de wrote: Hi Robert, Hello Arne, Apologies for my unsolicited message - I found your email address on the Opendaylight Netconf project page in jira. I am addressing you directly because I couldn’t find information on a mailing list or slack channel

Re: [ODL Discuss] Reg: Dynamic registration of Yang Models #opendaylight

On 20/10/2021 17:00, ravic...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, Hello Ravi, We are building a domain manager product in order to provision network devices in the PON and DOCSIS domains for which we are using lighty.io as the core framework. We have quite a few YANG models which serve as the core m

Re: [ODL Discuss] [E] [OpenDaylight TSC] Moderating mailinglists

what to do :) Thanks so very much, Robert Thanks, Navid On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 10:26 AM Robert Varga <mailto:n...@hq.sk>> wrote: Hello everyone, we sorely need people moderating our mailing lists. The jobs description is simple: 1) setup filters to redirect

[ODL Discuss] Moderating mailinglists

Hello everyone, we sorely need people moderating our mailing lists. The jobs description is simple: 1) setup filters to redirect approvals to a separate folder 2) look at that folder at least once a day, doing: 2a) delete spam 2b) send an empty reply to valid emails Step 1) is required because

Re: [ODL Discuss] [OpenDaylight TSC] [opendaylight-dev][release] OpenDaylight - Phosphorus release status

On 07/10/2021 14:47, Guillaume Lambert via lists.opendaylight.org wrote: Hello I confirm  we are in the process of releasing with Gilles at the wheel. Though, jenkins outtage are braking us. After a succesfull build, the stage release job failed this morning with a weird message ERROR: I/O e

Re: [ODL Discuss] working simultaneously on new features and with upstream dependencies bug fixes

On 06/10/2021 16:39, guillaume.lamb...@orange.com wrote: Hello Hello again, Thanks for your feedback Robert. You're apologized for the late reply. My mailbox is also pretty full. I agree with you. Release should be preferred to SNAPSHOT. There is a lot of things that evolved since then and T

Re: [ODL Discuss] working simultaneously on new features and with upstream dependencies bug fixes

On 19/10/2020 15:34, guillaume.lamb...@orange.com wrote: Hi all Hello, We started an interesting discussion during our DDF last week with Robert who proposed to keep on talking by email. Sorry this was stuck way down on the to-reply list. Here is a quick sum-up. During the release cycle,

[ODL Discuss] Heads up: odlparent-10 to use Guava-31

Hellow everyone, this is a courtesy call to inform you that odlparent-10 will be adopting Guava-31.x.x as its baseline. Most of the users should not be affected, but there are a number of incompatibilities listed here: https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v31.0 Please object now it

[ODL Discuss] The road to Java 17

Hello everyone, as you might have noticed, Java 17 has been released: https://jdk.java.net/17/ with reference implementation here: https://jdk.java.net/java-se-ri/17 OpenDaylight currently requires Java 11 at compile-time and *should* be able to run on everything up to Java 17. This *should*

[ODL Discuss] Heads up: Sulfur will require maven-3.8.2+

Hello everyone, this is a heads-up notification that we will be implementing https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/ODLPARENT-260 for Sulfur SimRel. This is an upgrade from our current requirement of maven-3.5.x, but honestly if you do not have maven-3.6.x, you are wasting CPU cycles. This ve

Re: [ODL Discuss] yang tool failing to compile juniper yang with odl aluminium release #opendaylight

On 20/05/2021 11:17, mohit1992gu...@gmail.com wrote: > I am using the old aluminium version. I have connect the juniper SRX320 > device having junos verison 19.4R3-S1.3.  > [snip] > These following exception i am getting: > == > *[ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.a

Re: [ODL Discuss] ODL Issue For Ietf-alarm yang with key as identity

On 22/04/2021 14:41, Anshul Agrawal wrote: > Hi, Hello, > I am working for Netconf protocol for ietf-alarm yang. > >   > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8632 > >   > > Ietf-alarm yang has 3 keys for /alarms/alarm-list/alarm list, where > alarm-type-id

Re: [ODL Discuss] Removal of opendaylight-topology.yang

would be the plan for opendaylight-inventory anyway (used only by OFP last time I checked). I will re-check and send out a follow up about those. Thanks, Robert > > BR/Luis > > >> On Mar 26, 2021, at 4:06 AM, Robert Varga > <mailto:n...@hq.sk>> wrote: >> >>

[ODL Discuss] Removal of opendaylight-topology.yang

Hello everyone, as we are ramping out changes which will go into the Phosphorus MRI window (and thus be part of Phosphorus Simultaneous Release ~6 months from now), there is one major removal. It concerns OpenDaylight-specific models: - opendaylight-topology.yang - opendaylight-topology-inventory

Re: [ODL Discuss] [opendaylight-dev] opendaylight关于dlux的问题

Hello, dlux has not been updated in quite a while due to no web developer being interested enough. You can try your hand with self-building it from the dlux.git master (which is setup to point ot Magnesium SR2), but I think it does not really work yet. Patches are, as always, welcome. Regards, R

Re: [ODL Discuss] [OpenDaylight TSC] ODL deployment survey

On 28/08/2020 01:37, JamO Luhrsen wrote: >> * Will Operators be willing to have DevOps teams contribute to the >> upstream community? >> > Just DevOps? I think other contributions are sorely missing as well. > Dev, Test, release engineering... Not only. My primary thought was "at least dev

Re: [ODL Discuss] How can I change my topology using RESTCONF commands?

On 23/07/2020 20:21, Luis Gomez wrote: > I am not sure what is the purpose of reading/writting in the config > topology: > /restconf/configuration/network-topology:network-topology/topology/flow:1, > but whatever it is, it is not implemented in ODL. If I were to venture a guess, the intent *might*

Re: [ODL Discuss] [opendaylight-dev] [release] Action for PTLs & projects: Project Wiki Pages

On 03/07/2020 02:03, Luis Gomez wrote: > As I said in this morning TSC, we have ODL interns helping moving > content from old wiki to new wiki. If PTLs just fix the project landing > page links to point to the right old wiki links, the interns can easily > pick up and move old wiki links content to

Re: [ODL Discuss] We can't edit wiki/confluence pages anymore

On 26/05/2020 16:41, Guillaume Lambert via lists.opendaylight.org wrote: > It’s true we received some pieces of information on the mailing-list but > I would have appreciated a clear explanation about the strategy here if > there is one. > I am sorry but I didn’t catch by which fancy those domains

Re: [ODL Discuss] [kernel-dev] How to avoid maven version check?

On 16/04/2020 15:22, Wang senxiao wrote: > > Hi all, > >     *I compile my project use the command mvn clean install, but get an > error:* > >         [WARNING] Rule 1: > org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.RequireMavenVersion failed with message: > >        Detected Maven Version: 3.3.9 is not i

Re: [ODL Discuss] [OpenDaylight Discuss] ODL Got Link/Nodes information updated in real time

On 25/03/2020 04:55, Daniel de la Rosa wrote: > Thank you for the clarification. I thought that openflow stats included > delay and jitter, and those were available via dlux..: but just checked > and it is not the case  Yeah, an OFP limitation. I do believe BGP/LS does include this TE information,

Re: [ODL Discuss] [Aaa-dev] [OpenDaylight Discuss] sodium restconf auth method

On 24/03/2020 21:54, Luis Gomez wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I do not think there is any plan for replacing the removed oauth/token > interface. Please feel free to contribute this to ODL. Correct. The initial announcement about this feature going away was here: https://lists.opendaylight.org/g/aaa-

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] DLUX is not available in Open Daylight- Sodium

On 18/03/2020 05:59, Laxman Bhandari wrote: > Hi, > > I have installed new ODL (Sodium) and tried to add dlux features but it > is not listed in karaf feature. Just wondering what could be the reason. 1) it is not part of Sodium release (SR2+ only) 2) it is not part of the base distribution (kara

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [OpenDaylight TSC] TWS Today

On 06/01/2020 17:55, Tejas Nevrekar wrote: > Hi all, > > The agenda for today's TWS was for getting together to complete the > lighty project proposal. > > Not sure if the lighty team is ok for that today. > > Robert, can you please confirm? Sorry, there's a public holiday in Slovakia, so every

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [opendaylight-dev] How to develop Netconf application with Sodium release?

On 05/11/2019 11:36, Dudek, Michal (Nokia - PL/Krakow) wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to create Opendaylight application which manages devices > connected via NETCONF interface. > > Unfortunately, existing examples are outdated and are not supported with > the latest SODIUM release of Opendayli

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] l2switch flow removal

On 18/10/2019 03:26, Luis Gomez wrote: It is mostly a matter of bandwidth, expertise is not that important here. If you think you can spare some time in the ODL community, first updating the code to recent release (e.g. sodium), and second adding some features and fixing some bugs at your disc

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] unusual snapshots

On 15/10/2019 22:11, Yevgeny wrote: Hi, Analyzing a problem on our customer site, we found an unusual for us content of snapshots folder: -rw-rw-r-- 588369268 10 14 17:30 snapshot-member-1-shard-default-operational-*40001*-1571041824314 -rw-rw-r    725285773 10 14 19:26 snapshot-member-

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] Is it possible to delete snapshot and journal on Follower?

On 22/08/2019 16:56, yevgeny.shakhnov...@us.fujitsu.com wrote: > Hi, > > We frequently have problems with synchronization between Leader and > Follower that was just brought up. Follower may have very old state and > synchronization fails because of time-out. > > Is it possible to start the Follo

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] ODL Sodium Java 8 or Java 11

On 26/08/2019 11:52, Stephen Kitt wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 12:32:11PM +, Paul Dennehy P wrote: >> I am just curious to know if the Sodium release will be on Java 8 or 11? >> I can see some of the master branches have moved to Java 11. > > Sodium builds on Java 8. The next rele

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [controller-dev] Migrating inventory/topology models

[+ discuss, mdsal-dev] On 05/09/2019 19:24, Anil Vishnoi wrote: > As for the next steps, I think we need to migrate these models to > openflowplugin, where they can be maintained, as that world is the only > place that really uses them. > > As far as upstream OpenDaylight is concern t

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [controller-dev] Guava-28 removed CheckedFuture

On 01/07/2019 10:28, Faseela K wrote: >I will try to take it up for genius, netvirt and serviceutils. Hello Faseela, based on the direction taken in https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/82889, I think the best approach for genius/netvirt would be: 1) eliminate netvirt's use of non-Typed*Trans

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [controller-dev] Guava-28 removed CheckedFuture

On 01/07/2019 11:08, Robert Varga wrote: > > On 01/07/2019 10:28, Faseela K wrote: >> Robert, >>Can you create a JIRA with the plan for deprecation and removal of >> controller APIs? > Sure. > > https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/CONTROLLER-1902 tracks

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] OPERATIONAL datastore change listen

On 01/07/2019 13:22, 王森枭 wrote: > Hello guys, I have one question to consult you. I have write code to > monitor OPERATIONAL datastore, but when I send message to trigger it > according to postman, it can not enter listening process, is the > OPERATIONAL datastore not supporting writing in this way

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] help

On 02/07/2019 11:49, Lori Jakab wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 7:59 PM Asnake Ayele M. > wrote: > > is there any alternative to l2sitch and dlux in opendaylight.? > > > I don't know about l2switch, but there haven't been any new/alternative > GUI proposed for OD

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [controller-dev] Guava-28 removed CheckedFuture

03 tracks removal. >I will try to take it up for genius, netvirt and serviceutils. Awesome, thanks! Regards, Robert > Thanks, > Faseela > > -Original Message----- > From: Robert Varga > Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 1:56 PM > To: Faseela K ; rele...@lis

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [controller-dev] Guava-28 removed CheckedFuture

ards, Robert > Thanks, > Faseela > > -Original Message- > From: controller-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org > On Behalf Of Robert Varga > Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 1:36 PM > To: rele...@lists.opendaylight.org; odlparent-...@lists.opendaylight.org; > controller-.

[OpenDaylight Discuss] Guava-28 removed CheckedFuture

Hello everyone, this is just a heads up that Guava 28 removed CheckedFuture: https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v28.0 This means that controller-based MD-SAL APIs are now officially dead weight. While there is no immediate need to upgrade Guava in Magnesium, there is now a real need t

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [OpenDaylight TSC] TSC Meeting minutes for June 20, 2019

On 20/06/2019 20:10, Abhijit Kumbhare wrote: > Hi TSC, > > Please find & review the TSC meeting minutes below: > > https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2019-06-20-16.09.html My AIs: 1) archetype follow-up: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pip

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [controller-dev] 答复: Problem: ODL Neon archetype repo missing?

On 20/06/2019 18:41, Robert Varga wrote: > > Okay, with Stephen's help I was able to get the project into a > semi-reasonable state -- i.e. you can currently use 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT to > target Neon GA and 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT to target current Sodium. > > There are a couple mor

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [OpenDaylight TSC] TSC Meeting minutes for June 20, 2019

On 20/06/2019 22:08, Casey Cain wrote: > Hi, Michael. > > In the last few DDFs I have brought up the idea of migrating to a > Confluence wiki.  There are several reasons why I've been encouraging this. > Internally at the LF we have been building a set of tools and automation > over the last sever

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] Future OpenDaylight Developer Forms

Both, each with different primary focus (given the timeframe rel. SR): - ONS EU: Magnesium deliverables, project-wide activities syncup - other: Feb 2020 Magnesium final push/post-mortem, Aluminium project planning I would also like to see if we can get hackathons during these... Regards, Robert

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [release] [OpenDaylight TSC] Magnesium supporting Java 11+ only

On 21/06/2019 07:18, Faseela K wrote: > Robert, > >    +1 for moving to Java 11 for Magnesium. > >   > >    Do you have any study already done, on the impacts of the migration? > >    Basically want to estimate how easy it will be for genius/netvirt to > move to java 11. > >    If there is a n

[OpenDaylight Discuss] Magnesium supporting Java 11+ only

Hello, as noted in https://meetings.opendaylight.org/opendaylight-meeting/2019/tsc/opendaylight-meeting-tsc.2019-03-07-17.00.html, we have made Sodium a combined Java 8/11 release. With Magnesium starting in about three months, there is a need for Offset-0 projects to know what the target release

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [OpenDaylight TSC] Service Desk Migration

On 17/06/2019 21:23, Casey Cain wrote: > The new service desk will become available to you starting Monday, June > 17, 2019. > > Any support requests that are already open in RT will be preserved and > completed there, so there is no need to re-submit them again using the > Jira Service Desk. Any

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [release] [Aaa-dev] Removal of IdP component from AAA

On 22/03/2019 22:30, Daniel De La Rosa wrote: > Robert, thank you for the details. Abhijit, i think we still need to > discuss the details during our next TSC meeting since it sounds like > there will be major impact for our customers Hello Daniel, any update on the impact for your customers? Th

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] Runtime load of YANG file

On 25/04/2019 23:04, Alexis de Talhouët wrote: > Greeting folks, Hello Alexis, > I know this is not a new topic, but I’d like to have a fresh view on this: Is > it technically possible to load yang at runtime? > If so, is it possible out-of-the-box, else could you share some leads on how > to i

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [Aaa-dev] Removal of IdP component from AAA

On 21/03/2019 18:07, Luis Gomez wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Can you please explain the impact of this? e.g. can we for instance change > the default user admin/admin or use token authentication after this change? Well, I am just a caretaker trying to get things moving forward. From what I remember,

[OpenDaylight Discuss] Removal of IdP component from AAA

Hello everyone, as part of keeping OpenDaylight infrastructure secure and relevant, we will be removing OAuth2 Identity Provider component from the AAA project. There are three technical drivers behind this decision: 1) current implementation is based on Apache Oltu, which has been terminated on

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

On 15/03/2019 03:38, Parul Agrawal wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your reply. As suggested  I tried to compile dluxapp for > fluorine by updating the version of odlparent to 4.0.9 in all pom files. > But I am getting the below error on compilation .Can you please help me > in this regard?. Thank you

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] Java 11 adoption

On 07/03/2019 19:23, Robert Varga wrote: > > To re-iterate the requirements, they are only four points: > >> 2) All participating projects are required to built with JDK 11 no later >> than the midway checkpoint. This requirement is checked by the >> autorelease-sodiu

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] Java 11 adoption

Hello everyone, On 22/02/2019 00:28, Robert Varga wrote: > On 10/01/2019 19:30, Robert Varga wrote: >> As an alternative we could skip the combined Java 8/Java 11 release, >> going directly to a Java 11-only release -- either with Sodium or with >> Magnesium. >> &

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] ONAP's ODL distro

On 25/02/2019 13:17, Alexis de Talhouët wrote: > Greetings all, Hello Alexis, > Following a call last week, I started creating a specific ODL distro for > ONAP’s need. > Here is the current draft: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/79075/ > > Question is: when creating the ODL distro, a few files get

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] Java 11 adoption

On 10/01/2019 19:30, Robert Varga wrote: > Hello everyone, > > as I noted in previous updates, our Neon release stream looks rather > good where JDK11 compatibility is concerned, with my local builds with > JDK11 passing with minor fixes (submitted) up to and including > openflo

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [release] Can't do merge in snmp4sdn stable/neon branch

On 20/02/2019 14:17, guillaume.lamb...@orange.com wrote: > Hi all > >   > > Than Ha, I got the same question on another thread so thank you for the > clarifications. > >   > > Here is my feedback. > > If SM projects are affected by the branch lock of Managed projects > because of Gerrit limita

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [OpenDaylight TSC] Stable branches etc.

On 11/02/2019 15:01, Sam Hague wrote: > We really need to address the 'wild west' aspect here -- and we need > concrete examples from past two releases. > > Possible example, the sodium branch is broken for NetVirt because of the > karaf.shell missing. [1] was pushed to add the pom depende

Re: [OpenDaylight Discuss] [OpenDaylight TSC] Stable branches etc.

On 30/01/2019 15:30, Sam Hague wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:03 AM > wrote: > > Hi Stephen > > I am sharing your feedback and thinks it would make a lot of sense. > Many linux distros use something similar to deal with staging > pac

  1   2   >