Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 for ppc xf86-log etc

2002-04-30 Thread Jose Fonseca
hen the order of writes do matter. On the other hand the bulk of data is sent via DMA anyway. > (I wonder if the wmb() shouldn't rather be after the writel() in > ##_WRITE() ...) > It's the same, since in a set of writes there will be always one extra wmb() either at the beginning or the end. > Looks like this could even be templated? > I don't think that the C preprocessor would allow templates in the macros names... Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 for ppc xf86-log etc

2002-04-24 Thread Jose Fonseca
oubles than that. Please supply more information about the failure. Is there any message on the system log (usually /var/log/messages). Can you access the computer trhu network after the hang? > > Peter > Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] How to allocate DMA memory

2002-04-24 Thread Jose Fonseca
ery much for the background info. > > -- /\ > Jens Owen/ \/\ _ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /\ \ \ Steamboat Springs, Colorado > Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] How to allocate DMA memory

2002-04-24 Thread Jose Fonseca
the other cards? > I'm just waay to busy to have completed what I had in mind up until recently. Could you share with us what you had in mind before? Now that Leif and I have been studying a little this subject I think we are able to follow and discuss your ideas. > > --

[Dri-devel] Compiler farm

2002-04-19 Thread Jose Fonseca
building on a machine with a XFree86 4.x installed on the system. So I decided to request to the SF compiler farm support that the XFree86 is updated, because I don't see any other easy way to do it... Another thing, the mach64 snapshots will be nightly only, as I don't think it&#x

[Dri-devel] A question for tonight...

2002-04-15 Thread Jose Fonseca
bdrm.a or DDX which involves a change on the init structure this will most likely to occur and, at least on my systems, it locks mach64.o on the kernel, and only a reset can allow normal operation again. Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

[Dri-devel] Re: [utah-glx-dev] Joining efforts

2002-04-15 Thread Jose Fonseca
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 17:46, Philip Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 12:35:41PM +0100, Jose Fonseca wrote: > > I know that main reason for resuming the development of Utah-GLX was the > > difficulties involved in porting the DRM to others OS, such as Solaris. > > But wh

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 PCI support added to 2D driver

2002-04-15 Thread Jose Fonseca
? Just tell me and I send it to you. > No. To know that it worked fine is enough! I makes it worth that I stayed awake until 2:00 AM last night debugging all this. > THANKS > You're welcome. You have yourself to thank for too because

Re: [Dri-devel] Annouce: Major update of the FAQ

2002-04-15 Thread Jose Fonseca
ources' of the DRI page, just to avoid the painful > search to find a copy when I needed it... I also have a copy myself, but it's a good idea to have it on the DRI website. > > a+ > -- > Nicolas Aspert Signal Proce

[Dri-devel] Joining efforts

2002-04-15 Thread Jose Fonseca
o see this happens as I believe it would benefit us all. Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] mach64: performanc = f (phys. screen res.)

2002-04-11 Thread Jose Fonseca
; _Felix___\Ä/\ \_\ \_\ \__U___just not everything >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >o<__/ \___/ \___/at the same time! > Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] joinin' da crew

2002-03-18 Thread Jose Fonseca
Lustyik, On 2002.03.18 03:17 Alexander Stohr wrote: > > i'm really curious whether i can join the project. i have > > fine c/ c++ knowledge, but i haven't programmed under linux > > yet (but now it's time to change). my question is first of > > all, do i need special skills/knowledge (apart from

[Dri-devel] mach64 binaries: do work! Was: do not work...

2002-03-14 Thread Jose Fonseca
ey, please test once more. If everything is okay, I'll start uploading the mach64 snapshots to the DRI website as well. (And put a README describing the current limitations of mach64) Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing lis

Re: [Dri-devel] [Announce] DRI-Devel-FAQ & binary snapshotsavailable from DRI

2002-03-13 Thread Jose Fonseca
rocedure and the state of the snapshots would be interesting indeed, and with a general note saying to never mix different drivers snapshots, i.e., always uninstall before installing a second one, as this would break the installation script (and covers the libGL case). Jose Fonseca

[Dri-devel] [Announce] DRI-Devel-FAQ & binary snapshots available from DRIwebsite

2002-03-13 Thread Jose Fonseca
riss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/faq/ . The website will only contain the main revisions and will always be in sync with the FAQ CVS. The mach64 snapshots aren't being uploaded to the DRI website yet. I'm just waiting for a confirmation that there are no caveats associated with the new packages

Re: [Dri-devel] [Announce] New mach64 snapshot

2002-03-13 Thread Jose Fonseca
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 18:03, Michael Thaler wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 04:33:10PM +0000, Jose Fonseca wrote: > > > I would also like to point out that at this moment the > > mach64-0-0-3-branch, from where this snapshot was taken, is perfectly > > usable with

Re: [Dri-devel] [Announce] New mach64 snapshot

2002-03-13 Thread Jose Fonseca
On Wed, 2002-03-13 at 17:02, Thomas Dodd wrote: > > > Jose Fonseca wrote: > > I've changed my mach64's cvsbld and dripkg scripts to have separate > > build trees (so there are no *.o anymore in the DRM dir), just install > > the DDX drivers that belong t

[Dri-devel] Binary packages download statistics

2002-03-13 Thread Jose Fonseca
that each driver has been going through lately. Note that the tcl-0-0-branch isn't available to download here -- something that I plan to change (including it in the bleeding-edge directory to differentiate from the trunk) as soon as I make my changes in the mach64 scripts general to all driv

[Dri-devel] [Announce] New mach64 snapshot

2002-03-13 Thread Jose Fonseca
ll eventually try to find a way to generate a changelog automatically but it won't happen soon, sorry. Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] mach64 binaries: do not work

2002-03-11 Thread Jose Fonseca
it seems DRI is loaded as necessary > Well, first let's try to figure out the first problem as this second one could be a side effect. > Cheers, > > Sergey > Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Texture levels?

2002-03-07 Thread Jose Fonseca
On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 19:21, Brian Paul wrote: > Jose Fonseca wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 17:23, Brian Paul wrote: > > > ... > > > > > > You seem to have been confused by "texture levels" before. Looks like > > > you'v

Re: [Dri-devel] Texture levels?

2002-03-07 Thread Jose Fonseca
27;t found an explanation of why the maximum texture size was being derived from the maximum texture level in Mesa. In the specs it says that the the maximum allowable size of a texture must be _at least_ 2^(k-lod)-2*b_t , and not equal. Otherwise, where does it stay a card that's not capable

Re: [Dri-devel] Sony Vaio - PCG C1VP - mach64 branch

2002-03-07 Thread Jose Fonseca
g state is being setup properly, since I have the feeling this may be the problem. > > -- > Leif Delgass > http://www.retinalburn.net > > I've been a little busy with work lately since it had fallen behind when I dedicated myself to bring up the mach64-0-0-3-branch las

Re: [Dri-devel] Premultiplication of the texture homogeneouscoordinates in mach64

2002-03-06 Thread Jose Fonseca
by defining it's own methods, instead of defining just the code-path. > > -- > Tell that to the Marines! > Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

[Dri-devel] Suggested reading

2002-03-05 Thread Jose Fonseca
I've added a new section to the FAQ regarding the suggested reading for a newbie. I would appreciate comments on it. It can be reached at http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/faq/html/getting-started.html#SUGGESTED-READING Jose Fonseca __

[Dri-devel] Re: mach64 single texture unit working

2002-03-05 Thread Jose Fonseca
hey faced some DMA problems. > -- > Leif Delgass > http://www.retinalburn.net > Jose Fonseca __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.co

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: mach64 cliprects/scissors

2002-03-04 Thread Jose Fonseca
> Keith > It's a good setup. Unfortunately, my devel box and test box are my laptop - the one and only computer I have at home. Seldom I hope to lend a 2nd laptop of a friend of mine to deal with X crashes. Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Fwd: [Dri-devel] i81x DRMs on new kernels Was: DRI packagesprogress notice

2002-02-27 Thread Jose Fonseca
It seems there is problems with the i81x DRM with new kernels. Jose' Fonseca -Forwarded Message- > From: Thomas Dodd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jose Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] DRI packages progress notice > Date: 27 Feb 2002 1

Re: [Dri-devel] CVS merge question again..

2002-02-26 Thread Jose Fonseca
de wouldn't be properly merged and I would lose more time debugging after. Regards, Jose Fonseca On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 16:32, Jose Fonseca wrote: > I'm in the process of merging the files from mach64-0-0-2-branch into > the recently created mach64-0-0-3-branch from the trunk. &

Re: [Dri-devel] CVS merge question again..

2002-02-26 Thread Jose Fonseca
it really best do it manually, or is there a another way of doing things (other tool perhaps)? Regards, Jose Fonseca PS: Sorry for these beginner questions, but everyone has to learn a first time, and I think that you can give a better advice than a CVS user list since you know

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI packages progress notice

2002-02-22 Thread Jose Fonseca
I've also put the my (incredible simple and featureless) script for doing this at the scripts/ subdirectory. Jose Fonseca On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 16:56, Jose Fonseca wrote: > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed > sucessfully. The generated packages are a

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI packages progress notice

2002-02-22 Thread Jose Fonseca
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 17:02, Alan Hourihane wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 04:56:48PM +0000, Jose Fonseca wrote: > > Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed > > sucessfully. The generated packages are available at: > > > > http://mefris

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI packages progress notice

2002-02-22 Thread Jose Fonseca
un on user space and, in principle, are the only from were we could get a stack trace from a user. Regards, Jose Fonseca On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 15:00, Jose Fonseca wrote: > Hi, > > I'm just posting to say that I haven't forgot the promise to provide > DRI binary driver snapsh

Re: [Dri-devel] Unreal [was: Mach 64 success and problems]

2002-02-20 Thread Jose Fonseca
I'm talking about but I have to confess that I never made a single OpenGL program, and the only GUI program I ever made was hacked on a existing program. I just like to know a little about everything. (Though I'm loving getting deeper on DRI :-) Good look for your thesis. > Thank you

Re: [Dri-devel] Unreal [was: Mach 64 success and problems]

2002-02-19 Thread Jose Fonseca
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 18:51, Michael Thaler wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 05:17:16PM +0000, Jose Fonseca wrote: > > > No, there's no need. You probably just have to change the order on which > > /usr/lib/ and /usr/X11R6/lib/ directories appear on /etc/ld.so.conf and

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach 64 success and problems

2002-02-19 Thread Jose Fonseca
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 18:28, Malte Cornils wrote: > Jose Fonseca wrote: > >>mthaler:~# ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/glxinfo > >>libGL.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 (0x4009c000) > >>where quake3 probably uses the libGL from /usr/lib/ > >>lrwxrwxrwx

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach 64 success and problems

2002-02-19 Thread Jose Fonseca
have to change the order on which /usr/lib/ and /usr/X11R6/lib/ directories appear on /etc/ld.so.conf and run '/sbin/ldconfig' Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Pseudo DMA?

2002-02-08 Thread Jose Fonseca
rds or just a software hack for debugging purposes? Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] What to expect of mach64.o

2002-02-08 Thread Jose Fonseca
e answer to that question at http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/faq/html/hardware.html#MACH64 Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

[Dri-devel] Pseudo DMA?

2002-02-07 Thread Jose Fonseca
DMA and the PIO and MMIO modes? Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

[Dri-devel] Re: Patch: mach64 hw cursor bugfix

2002-02-06 Thread Jose Fonseca
would like to know how one merges the trunk with a branch. Could you briefly tell me the steps required? In the meanwhile I'm still going to see what can be done with the current tree as it is (more bugfixes, features,...). > -- > Leif Delgass > http://www.retinalburn.net >

[Dri-devel] mach64 hw cursor bug in DRI

2002-02-05 Thread Jose Fonseca
} So the fix is rather simple. My question is why having different variables with apparent same meaning and with different values? In xf86str.h says: /* Some of these may be moved out of here into the driver private area */ ... int videoRam; /* a

[Dri-devel] Dri-patches public access

2002-02-05 Thread Jose Fonseca
Is there any reason for public access to the Dri-patches mailing list? There has been a substantial amount of spam in this list lately... Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists

[Dri-devel] Re: How to setup DRI? Was: Bugfix for br0ken DMA on r128 andpossibly radeon DMA functions

2002-02-05 Thread Jose Fonseca
On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 14:50, James Hawtin wrote: > Is there a guide on how to setup DRI? I have never managed to ... > ... to go to the DRI website and search for documentation? ;-) Check http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc.phtml It covers most of your questions! > James >

[Dri-devel] Re: [Xpert]Re: XFree86 NDA documentation

2002-01-31 Thread Jose Fonseca
On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 17:24, Mike A. Harris wrote: > On 30 Jan 2002, Jose Fonseca wrote: > > >... > > > >In the comments Mike makes strong reference to join as XFree86 developer > >as a mean to obtain NDA documentation that is shared to all XFree86 > >develope

[Dri-devel] XFree86 NDA documentation

2002-01-30 Thread Jose Fonseca
holds true or not. Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] unsubsrcibed from list

2002-01-30 Thread Jose Fonseca
cize in it that the most recent version is always available at http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/faq/ . I don't know if in the future we can arrange a way to keep everything in sync and change this. I would like to know what is your opinion about this. Regards, Jose Fonseca On Tue,

dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

2002-01-28 Thread Jose Fonseca
card ? Kevin and Keith, if you know any public resources about this card please give me their links to include in the FAQ as well. Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Source -> Documentation using Doxygen

2002-01-25 Thread Jose Fonseca
gt; > difference in the build time would be almost negligible.) > > That would be a reasonable compromise. > Okay. If nobody else volunteers I'll give it a try when I'm finished with the FAQ (which by the way was recently updated and can be seen at

Re: [Dri-devel] Source -> Documentation using Doxygen

2002-01-25 Thread Jose Fonseca
preprocessing time but the includes files are just used inside XFree86 tree and the difference in the build time would be almost negligible.) Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Half-success with mach64

2002-01-22 Thread Jose Fonseca
ll be most welcome. Regards, Jose Fonseca On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 12:31, Bernard Cafarelli wrote: > I finally made it! I have a working mach64 dri on my compaq laptop(chipset mobility >M1). But the gears of glxgears look like hollowed out, and all 3D games (tried >tuxracer,tuxkart,doom

Re: [Dri-devel] IRC logs?

2002-01-22 Thread Jose Fonseca
I also wasn't able to keep up during all meeting, and I would also like to read to whole log. Jose Fonseca On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 11:29, Gareth Hughes wrote: > I had a meeting last night over an early dinner, so was unable to > attend yesterday's IRC session. Does anyone have

[Dri-devel] dri-devel mailing list archive

2002-01-18 Thread Jose Fonseca
whole XFree86 tree in Source Navigator (http://sources.redhat.com/sourcenav/). It allows you to easily browse through the source and quickly find the definition/implementation of any function. Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] htt

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 driver

2001-12-11 Thread Jose Fonseca
On Tue, 2001-12-11 at 14:51, Michael Thaler wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 12:45:59PM +0000, Jose Fonseca wrote: > > > Me neither. That's not a problem, just login as anonymous: > > > > cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/dri login > > &g

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 driver

2001-12-11 Thread Jose Fonseca
On Tue, 2001-12-11 at 12:14, Michael Thaler wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 11:52:59AM +0000, Jose Fonseca wrote: > > > > > cvs -z3 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/dri co -r > > mach64-0-0-2-branch xc > > I don't have a login so I can only download as

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 driver

2001-12-11 Thread Jose Fonseca
been updated recently to include this. Someone really should do that > > because there has been a lot of people trying to test the cvs tree > > (especially the mach64 branch). > Probably I'll be able to write little 10 lines HOWTO and post it here. > When I finish the proc

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 driver

2001-12-11 Thread Jose Fonseca
On Tue, 2001-12-11 at 10:54, Michael Thaler wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 03:09:35PM +0000, Jose Fonseca wrote: > > > I don't know what particular version of XFree 4.10 you have used but you > > must also install the X server from the mach64 build tree. The usual way

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 driver

2001-12-10 Thread Jose Fonseca
r needs a lot of cpu > power. When I rum glxinfo X crashes, also when I run quake. > > Do I have to use the newly compiled X server to really run gl apps? I > looked at the XFree log file and it only tells that the server > aborted, no reasons. > Yes you need, as said above, and th

[Dri-devel] Random receival of this list mail

2001-12-07 Thread Jose Fonseca
contact regarding this? PS: Please CC me in any reply to this message for the obvious reasons... Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] First experience with binary shapshot

2001-12-06 Thread Jose Fonseca
glxinfo > name of display: :0.0 > display: :0 screen: 0 > direct rendering: Yes > > Any ideas? > > --Andreas Karrenbauer > Have you enable all user access to DRI by putting: Section "DRI" Mode 0666 EndSect

Re: [Dri-devel] Module stripping Was: First experience with binary shapshot: part 3, success

2001-12-06 Thread Jose Fonseca
ething like that) that was broken after the stripping. These are just suppositions but I intend to investigate the subject further myself. Regards, Jose Fonseca Nokia 5510 looks weird sounds great. Go to http://uk.promotions.yahoo.c

Re: [Dri-devel] Module stripping Was: First experience with binary shapshot: part 3, success

2001-12-06 Thread Jose Fonseca
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 10:24, Michel Danzer wrote Nokia 5510 looks weird sounds great. Go to http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/nokia/ discover and win it! The competition ends 16 th of December 2001. _

Re: [Dri-devel] First experience with binary shapshot

2001-12-05 Thread Jose Fonseca
Andreas Karrenbauer > > PS: Because of a new job I haven't had much time the past month, but > congratulations to Manuel Teira. He's done very well. I'm listening to > the list and hope to find time to contribute in any way > Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] hw cursor in mach64

2001-12-03 Thread Jose Fonseca
Leif, I've managed to solve that same problem by leaving "NoLighting=False" and changing "UseMultiTexture=0". Fortunatly we can get the source for the OpenGLDrv at http://openut.sourceforge.net . I'm sure that that will help us find the "source" of these

Re: [Dri-devel] binary snapshots

2001-12-03 Thread Jose Fonseca
or me (if you have > installed the latest updated kernel from RH which is 2.4.9-13). If so, > could you put them somewhere?:) Even if your kernel is not exactly this, > I could give a try... (using insmod -f :) > Ok. I have no problem in doing that. Give-me a couple days an

Re: [Dri-devel] binary snapshots Was: hw cursor in mach64

2001-12-03 Thread Jose Fonseca
r and libs be compatible with XFree 4.1.0 > from RH7.2 distro? > It's possible to build the modules separately. The Redhat for instance does that in its kernel source. To answer to your 2nd question: yes. It's exactly the same distribution I have on my laptop... > Regards, >

Re: [Dri-devel] hw cursor in mach64

2001-12-03 Thread Jose Fonseca
via samba or nfs. If the problem is slow/expensive internet connection I think that I it would be no problem if I hosted a bzipped tarball of the mach64 branch snapshot. Regards, Jose Fonseca On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 15:11, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote: > Hi all > > It seems people are act

Re: [Dri-devel] hw cursor in mach64

2001-12-03 Thread Jose Fonseca
he hardware cursor memory shouldn't be even allocated I think that the problem is either a bad deactivation of the hw cursor or a unsolicited activation. Perhaps the registers are overwritten somehow. Regards, Jose Fonseca On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 14:00, Carl Busjahn wrote: > Your mobility 4mb migh

[Dri-devel] hw cursor in mach64

2001-12-03 Thread Jose Fonseca
27;sw_cursor'. This appears during game and menus - it seems that Unreal draws itself the cursor by software regardless of the availability of hardware acceleration. Any ideas? Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing lis

[Dri-devel] Re: Mach64

2001-11-21 Thread Jose Fonseca
--- > Mike A. Harris Shipping/mailing address: > OS Systems Engineer 190 Pittsburgh Ave., Sault Ste. Marie, > XFree86 maintainer Ontario, Canada, P6C 5B3 > Red Hat Inc.Phone: (705)949-2136 > http://www.redhat.com ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris > Red Hat XFree86 mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > General open IRC discussion:#xfree86 on irc.openprojects.net > -- > I agree with you, Mike. I was mentalized to the idea that I wouldn't do much diving in the beggining. That's why I wasked in what I should be of best help... because I do want to _help_ - not get in the way of anybody - and there are lot of different kinds of helping... In the meanwhile I'll just start study the information I have in the my free time: the DRI cvs, the utah-glx cvs, the GATOS source, and the specs... Regards, Jose Fonseca ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

[Dri-devel] mach64 extra help

2001-11-20 Thread Jose Fonseca
m willing to learn... In what way do you think I would be of best help? Regards, Jose Fonseca __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and M

[Dri-devel] Unresolved symbols when starting XFree mach64 server

2001-11-16 Thread Jose Fonseca
le /usr/X11R6-DRI/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is unresolved! Symbol .LC0 from module /usr/X11R6-DRI/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is unresolved! Symbol .LC1 from module /usr/X11R6-DRI/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is unresolved! Symbol .LC0 from module /usr/X11R6-DRI/lib/modules/fonts/libbi