[DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Coordinating DD mode "repeaters"

2009-03-26 Thread Ron Wright
Lots of good answers and comments. One always should coordinate their repeater. Give much protection and keeps others from being assigned your freq. One comment. We as DS users and especially repeater owners/ops need to work very closely with state freq coordinators. They most often know lit

[DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Coordinating DD mode "repeaters"

2009-03-26 Thread Ron Wright
Tom & Scott, I am still learning about DS and wanting to take advantage of the digital modes. I know my question will show I know little, hi. I am interested in the Packet type operation of DS. That is a system that uses a simplex one freq mode for passing info as the old analog Packet system

[DSTAR_DIGITAL] ID-800 problem

2009-03-26 Thread Ron Wright
Hi all, Couple days ago I set in a new DS repeater in my ID-800. However, later noticed when this repeater came up there was no audio from the rig spkr. I later found that I had turned on the CTCSS "decode" and it got programmed along with the other DS info. Since DS does not use CTCSS it wou

[DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Radio,Coverage and Coded tx

2009-03-26 Thread Ron Wright
My experience with buying D-Star rigs is with the IC91AD HT and ID-800 mobile. I first bought the IC91 dual band HT for it was the least expensive way to go, $400. I like the HT and used it for over 8 months and learned a lot about D-Star. I could get into repeater on D-Star with 5 W solid tha

[DSTAR_DIGITAL] id-800

2009-03-25 Thread Ron Wright
Steve, Did not think about the copywrite, sorry. I see stuff for 20+ old rigs and think the orginal company does not care, but can see problem with rig in production. Sorry again for the slip up. I guess we should remove. 73, ron, n9ee/r

[DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Legally Identifying?

2009-03-25 Thread Ron Wright
Hi all, One point on verbal IDing. When in a mobile I do not wish to be looking down at my rig to read the IDs. This is danagerous. The automatic ID is great feature especially for nets and basic base operation, but for mobile not me. I do it out of FM analog habit, but also as curtisy(spl?)

[DSTAR_DIGITAL] ID800 menus

2009-03-25 Thread Ron Wright
Hi all, I find when setting up a rig having flow charts or some sort of quick reference is valuable. I put in FILES in the directory "ID-800 Dual Band Xcvr" scanned in copies of the Mode Arrangements, pages 123-126 of the manual. These charts show the sequence and brief title of each in the m

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Factory programmed memories in IC-91AD?

2008-07-21 Thread Ron Wright
gital] Re: Factory programmed memories in IC-91AD? > >Ron Wright wrote: > >> However, one would think this "reset" would not be on page 118 of the >> manual, but a seperate card to get ones attention if this should be done >> from the start

Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Factory programmed memories in IC-91AD?

2008-07-20 Thread Ron Wright
u got a demo or new in the box well maybe if it still has the tape type covers over the display, other freqs with calls programmed or seal on the box. Of course this is not full proof. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: [dstar_digital] Factory programmed memories in IC-91AD?

2008-07-19 Thread Ron Wright
uot; rig? > >Thanks, >Scott, N9AA > >[ed - It is normal to find short wave, etc pre-programmed.] > > Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: [dstar_digital] 91AD vs 92AD handhelds

2008-07-15 Thread Ron Wright
her. > >Thanks, > >Ron >KA4KYI > > > Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: Re: {Disarmed} Re: RE: Re: [dstar _digital] Re: D-STAR Field  Day Update

2008-06-30 Thread Ron Wright
ccess the repeater while mobile and with a relatively >weak signal. Analog under those conditions results in a choppy but >mostly readable signal. > Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Inside Chassis coax - lossy

2008-06-30 Thread Ron Wright
;duplexer to make the 400 kHz split play. The results of some testing >using a reference antenna are in the tech log at www.w6dhs.org . >Ernie >W6KAP > >--- In dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com, Ron Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>

Re: Re: Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Noise/Desense and Loss Measurements - RP4000V Cables

2008-06-29 Thread Ron Wright
rgy taken from the signal properties surely, from a physics >point of view. > Any elaboration on this relationship, I'm eager to learn? > >vk4tux > >From: Ron Wright > >Might improve loss somewhat, but main issue is cable radiation. > >73, ron, n9ee/r > Ron

Re: [dstar_digital] Noise/Desense and Loss Measurements - RP4000V Cables

2008-06-29 Thread Ron Wright
together the best system one can and for the high cost of $6k one really wants to know if performing the best one can get. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Noise/Desense and Loss Measurements - RP4000V Cables

2008-06-29 Thread Ron Wright
mewhat, but main issue is cable radiation. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Noise/Desense and Loss Measurements - RP4000V Cables

2008-06-29 Thread Ron Wright
which would make nice package with one RF connector on the rear. But if you gonna spend all that money with ICOM why not go for a large base type duplexer. It will make up for some of the ICOM DC to light front end and help keep some of the other UHF stuff out of your tx PA. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron

Re: [dstar_digital] Noise/Desense and Loss Measurements - RP4000V Cables

2008-06-29 Thread Ron Wright
aters. Known for decades. But of course good repeater manufactures don't use txs with only -60db supurious emmissions. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Noise/Desense and Loss Measurements - RP4000V Cables

2008-06-29 Thread Ron Wright
Bob, Good repeater builders and engineers are often Purists. Some get real burned by not being one. I guess it is ok for some to just duck tape it and be done with it. I have been told so many times "I know it don't meet spec, but it works". 6 months later they are reworking it to make it w

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] repeater mods

2008-06-29 Thread Ron Wright
Most often a double shielded cable will have more loss than a single shielded. This can be seen with RG8 vs RG214 or the like. I am not saying use RG8, but loss is most often not the issue in this case. It is the radiation or leakage which even in RG8 with 60% shield the radiation loss at les

Re: RE: [dstar_digital] Noise/Desense and Loss Measurements - RP4000V Cables

2008-06-29 Thread Ron Wright
Dave, One posting stated the rigs in the repeater were modified ID-1 and ID800s. Does this appear to be what is being used??? These rigs spec lower than typical good quality repeater rigs in spurious emmissions which can produce wide band noise affecting the performance using a duplexer. Wha

Re: [dstar_digital] Inside DSTAR Repeaters

2008-06-28 Thread Ron Wright
The ID-1 and ID800 are definitly not repeater gear. The ID-1 tx has supurious emmisions down only -50 db and ID800 only -60db. A good repeater tx would be down at least 80 db. Also the DC to light receivers means no front end. With heat sinks I would want additional cooling even though they a

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Inside Chassis coax - lossy

2008-06-28 Thread Ron Wright
gs. I bet they are one of the mod'd ICOM mobiles. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: RE: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-28 Thread Ron Wright
who do new things like DStar to show others. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Inside Chassis coax - lossy

2008-06-28 Thread Ron Wright
and use the mobile duplexers, but one needs to know what they provide and what they do not. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Inside Chassis coax - lossy

2008-06-28 Thread Ron Wright
retuned our 6 can full sized 2 meter duplexer >for our new 400 kHz split, they were happy to hear that it was a >digital system and the deepest and narrowest notches could be used to >achieve maximum notch. >Ernie >W6KAP > >

[dstar_digital] repeater mods

2008-06-28 Thread Ron Wright
hi all, Here is some info a friend of mine made to the ICOM DStar repeaters to make it perform better. 73, ron, n9ee/r The loss isn't the problem. It's that Icom is using a single shield cable, that's only 60% shielded, so the problem is desense -in- the box itself. What's the loss differe

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Limited access

2008-06-28 Thread Ron Wright
;The Labor Day Hurricane of 1935, and Hurricane Andrew in 1992. Both >were category 5s, and both hit south Florida. > >73 de W4AS >Sebastian > >On Jun 27, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Ron Wright wrote: > >> Not sure what Cat 5 hurricane you were in. There has never been a >&

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Limited access

2008-06-27 Thread Ron Wright
Not sure what Cat 5 hurricane you were in. There has never been a Cat 5 hurricane hit Florida going back over 100 years. Sure there has been one, maybe within last 100,000 yrs, hi. Kertina was Cat 5, but down to Cat 4 before hitting New Orlenes. I remember Charley in 2004. Was headed right

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-27 Thread Ron Wright
Have not read the DStar FD rules, but do DV Dungle?, computer to repeater to user contacts count for points??? If testing for emergency comm would think so for this mode would be used in disaster just like Echolink and IRLP have been used in some disasters here. It has been found Echolink is v

Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Inside Chassis coax - lossy

2008-06-27 Thread Ron Wright
r, but not from >anything or anyone else. Even then, you only get about 65dB of >isolation... so you better be using low power. > >They work "well" for portable repeaters and duplex subscriber units... >real repeaters use real duplexers. > >Lee > >

Re: [dstar_digital] D-STAR Field Day Update

2008-06-27 Thread Ron Wright
demo its usefulness. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: RE: [dstar_digital] Re: Limited access

2008-06-27 Thread Ron Wright
As stated access to the internet from your local connection will probably not be aviable if a Katrina or the like hits. The internet will be there, just the last mile will not. Some here with D-Star are thinking of RF linking to distant city DSTar repeaters for the gate way; a link or remote b

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Inside Chassis coax - lossy

2008-06-27 Thread Ron Wright
Mobile duplexers work very well. Repeaters have been built for years with the mobile duplexers inside the repeater enclosure with very good performance. If replacing the cables and moving outside I would think the cables were the problem and not where the duplexer was. Since you replaced the

Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Limited access

2008-06-27 Thread Ron Wright
Craig, When you loose power at your home most of the other areas around you most often have power and yes your internet might work. For New Orleans after Katrina type of event all for miles around you is down and I would not expect any service to work. Your battery/AC converter will make your

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Limited access

2008-06-27 Thread Ron Wright
Tony and all, Here in Tampa Bay, Florida, area we have a number of cable providers that offer cable, internet, phone, etc. on one cable. I have Verizon FIOS which is a fiber optics to the home and I subscribe to cable TV, internet at 3 Mb and phone. The phone is high, but the others are compe

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Inside Chassis coax - lossy

2008-06-26 Thread Ron Wright
DAve Anderson, you need to jump in here now. Dave mod'd ICOMs D-Star repeaters to make them work as they should. His input would be good. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: RE: [dstar_digital] Re: Inside Chassis coax - lossy

2008-06-26 Thread Ron Wright
This loss is about .11 db/ft, little more than RG58. If one used RG223 (double shielded RG58) the loss would be about the same. Going to RG214 loss would be .05 db/ft, an improvement. All this is at 400 MHz. At 400 MHz the .11db loss would be .63 watts from 25 watts. I don't think much impro

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] D-Star scramble code

2008-06-24 Thread Ron Wright
mode. This was the reason the ARRL in 2007 attempted to get FCC approval for wide band modes on bands down to 6 meters...it would open up more modes for high speed. So many opposed it due to thinking single ops would be occupying large chunks of spectrum. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727

Re: [dstar_digital] Interfacing Dstar Controller to an Analog Repeater

2008-06-19 Thread Ron Wright
Joe, Again the problem is the ICOM controller does not interface as most controllers do. The ICOM does not put out ptt/cos/tx & rx audio...it puts out a serial data stream the ICOM repeaters read and decode as commands, data, etc. As serial command to say key repeater, etc. If you decoded th

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] First few key-ups garbled on Dstar Repeater

2008-06-19 Thread Ron Wright
think best let ICOM take care of it, but might be months to fix. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: Re: {Disarmed} [dstar_digital] First few key-ups garbled on Dstar Repeater

2008-06-19 Thread Ron Wright
the >transmitter or other transmitters at the site... the way to do that is >well-documented and discussed by analog repeater builders all the time >at http://www.repeater-builder.com The RF part is still the same Physics. Analog or Digital one is transferring information with RF. Ju

Re: Re: {Disarmed} RE: {Disarmed} Re: {Disarmed} [dstar_digital] First few key-ups garbled on Dstar Repeater

2008-06-19 Thread Ron Wright
to receive. >> >> >> > >-- >John D. Hays - K7VE >Phone: 206-801-0820 >Fax: 866-309-6077 >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >VOIP/SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: [dstar_digital] First few key-ups garbled on Dstar Repeater

2008-06-19 Thread Ron Wright
Maybe already ask, but have you monitored the RF power out to make sure it comes up right away??? If it does not then you are dealing with a weak signal at first. 73, ron, n9ee/r >From: garyp609 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: 2008/06/18 Wed PM 07:02:26 EDT >To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com >Sub

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] First few key-ups garbled on Dstar Repeater

2008-06-19 Thread Ron Wright
He is desensing the monitoring rcvr making him think the repeater is not transmitting. Bet if he looks at the S-meter he will see signal, but audio does not open. Typical problem when listening to a repeater while txng on another rig on another freq. 73, ron, n9ee/r >From: Nate Duehr <[EM

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Interfacing Dstar Controller to an Analog Repeater

2008-06-19 Thread Ron Wright
ICOM locked their products to work together. The ICOM D-Star controller does not put out typical controller logic and audio. It talks to its repeaters with a CAT5 cable in a digital control format...serial data. This data is broken down in the repeaters radios and used for control...told when

Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Amplifiers for DStar repeater use

2008-06-17 Thread Ron Wright
e >> using cruddy Comet antennas hooked to 9913 or worse, and using small >> low-Q "mobile" duplexers. (Hopefully not all three of those >mistakes at >> the same time, but I bet there's at least one example of that out >there!) > >

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Announcing D-STAR at Field Day

2008-06-17 Thread Ron Wright
Ray, I aggree FD is a contest, but with the setup required to do a real FD, which so many do, one does get the training in setting up an emergency station. One learns about not only the radio set up, but feeding the animals, bath rooms that are not always what one wants, bugs, generators and n

Re: RE: [dstar_digital] Announcing D-STAR at Field Day

2008-06-17 Thread Ron Wright
. The repeater part would be the problem. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: RE: [dstar_digital] Announcing D-STAR at Field Day

2008-06-17 Thread Ron Wright
Ed, I do not believe FD has been diverted from “developing skills to meet the challenges of emergency preparedness as well as to acquaint the general public with the capabilities of Amateur Radio". I feel it still gives good practice of setting up an emergency station, testing that station and

Re: [dstar_digital] Announcing D-STAR at Field Day

2008-06-17 Thread Ron Wright
d to hearing you during D-STAR Field Day! > >Ed WA4YIH > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome.

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Amplifiers for DStar repeater use

2008-06-15 Thread Ron Wright
from their test it did not do as well mobile/HT use fro good voice comm. Cel phones use it primarily for muplexing more on one carrier. Time will tell. 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone, all are welcome. [ED - Can

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Amplifiers for DStar repeater use

2008-06-14 Thread Ron Wright
HOwever, adding a PA can reduce the affects of multi-path. With multi-path a resultant reduction in signal can be the issue. By adding power the results can be such that the signal can be recovered. 73, ron, n9ee/r >From: "John D. Hays" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: 2008/06/13 Fri PM 09:27:45 E

Re: Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Amplifiers for DStar repeater use

2008-06-14 Thread Ron Wright
Nate, I think the issue is not how many bars you get, but if one gets any bars at all. Increasing the power on the TX can increase the probablility of getting a bar. Of course the nice thing about digital it don't matter if 1 or more bars, assuming no other interferring critter. It is getting

Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Amplifiers for DStar repeater use

2008-06-13 Thread Ron Wright
Bill, I am involved in ARES type public safety, but not police, etc. I don't consider ARES public safety, but public service maybe. I understand if your users are HT users only then one designs to that. Then you might still have one large xmtr, but many rcv sites. In Ham Radio we are not tha

Re: [dstar_digital] Re: Amplifiers for DStar repeater use

2008-06-13 Thread Ron Wright
Although I tend to work on the antenna and receiver more, having higher power from the tx can be necessary. I never design a system for HTs. If a user is too lazy to put on a rig with some power, don't have to be 100 W, then why should I worry about him. I try to design with good low noise xmt

Re: [dstar_digital] GPS-A "other symbol"

2008-06-11 Thread Ron Wright
I have been trying to figure out where to put my info in the IC91AD that gets displayed on the users radio. I have my callsign and name, but cannot put more info. Any ideas??? 73, ron, n9ee/r Ron Wright, N9EE 727-376-6575 MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL No tone