Lots of good answers and comments.
One always should coordinate their repeater. Give much protection and keeps
others from being assigned your freq.
One comment. We as DS users and especially repeater owners/ops need to work
very closely with state freq coordinators. They most often know lit
Tom & Scott,
I am still learning about DS and wanting to take advantage of the digital
modes. I know my question will show I know little, hi.
I am interested in the Packet type operation of DS. That is a system that uses
a simplex one freq mode for passing info as the old analog Packet system
Hi all,
Couple days ago I set in a new DS repeater in my ID-800. However, later
noticed when this repeater came up there was no audio from the rig spkr.
I later found that I had turned on the CTCSS "decode" and it got programmed
along with the other DS info. Since DS does not use CTCSS it wou
My experience with buying D-Star rigs is with the IC91AD HT and ID-800 mobile.
I first bought the IC91 dual band HT for it was the least expensive way to go,
$400. I like the HT and used it for over 8 months and learned a lot about
D-Star. I could get into repeater on D-Star with 5 W solid tha
Steve,
Did not think about the copywrite, sorry. I see stuff for 20+ old rigs and
think the orginal company does not care, but can see problem with rig in
production. Sorry again for the slip up.
I guess we should remove.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Hi all,
One point on verbal IDing. When in a mobile I do not wish to be looking down
at my rig to read the IDs. This is danagerous. The automatic ID is great
feature especially for nets and basic base operation, but for mobile not me.
I do it out of FM analog habit, but also as curtisy(spl?)
Hi all,
I find when setting up a rig having flow charts or some sort of quick reference
is valuable.
I put in FILES in the directory "ID-800 Dual Band Xcvr" scanned in copies of
the Mode Arrangements, pages 123-126 of the manual. These charts show the
sequence and brief title of each in the m
gital] Re: Factory programmed memories in IC-91AD?
>
>Ron Wright wrote:
>
>> However, one would think this "reset" would not be on page 118 of the
>> manual, but a seperate card to get ones attention if this should be done
>> from the start
u got a demo or new in the box well maybe if it still has
the tape type covers over the display, other freqs with calls programmed or
seal on the box. Of course this is not full proof.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
uot; rig?
>
>Thanks,
>Scott, N9AA
>
>[ed - It is normal to find short wave, etc pre-programmed.]
>
>
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
her.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Ron
>KA4KYI
>
>
>
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
ccess the repeater while mobile and with a relatively
>weak signal. Analog under those conditions results in a choppy but
>mostly readable signal.
>
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
;duplexer to make the 400 kHz split play. The results of some testing
>using a reference antenna are in the tech log at www.w6dhs.org .
>Ernie
>W6KAP
>
>--- In dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com, Ron Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
rgy taken from the signal properties surely, from a physics
>point of view.
> Any elaboration on this relationship, I'm eager to learn?
>
>vk4tux
>
>From: Ron Wright
>
>Might improve loss somewhat, but main issue is cable radiation.
>
>73, ron, n9ee/r
>
Ron
together the best system one can and
for the high cost of $6k one really wants to know if performing the best one
can get.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
mewhat, but main issue is cable radiation.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
which
would make nice package with one RF connector on the rear. But if you gonna
spend all that money with ICOM why not go for a large base type duplexer. It
will make up for some of the ICOM DC to light front end and help keep some of
the other UHF stuff out of your tx PA.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Ron
aters. Known for decades. But of course good repeater
manufactures don't use txs with only -60db supurious emmissions.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
Bob,
Good repeater builders and engineers are often Purists. Some get real burned
by not being one.
I guess it is ok for some to just duck tape it and be done with it. I have
been told so many times "I know it don't meet spec, but it works". 6 months
later they are reworking it to make it w
Most often a double shielded cable will have more loss than a single shielded.
This can be seen with RG8 vs RG214 or the like. I am not saying use RG8, but
loss is most often not the issue in this case. It is the radiation or leakage
which even in RG8 with 60% shield the radiation loss at les
Dave,
One posting stated the rigs in the repeater were modified ID-1 and ID800s.
Does this appear to be what is being used???
These rigs spec lower than typical good quality repeater rigs in spurious
emmissions which can produce wide band noise affecting the performance using a
duplexer. Wha
The ID-1 and ID800 are definitly not repeater gear. The ID-1 tx has supurious
emmisions down only -50 db and ID800 only -60db. A good repeater tx would be
down at least 80 db. Also the DC to light receivers means no front end.
With heat sinks I would want additional cooling even though they a
gs. I bet they are one of the mod'd
ICOM mobiles.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
who do new things like
DStar to show others.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
and use the mobile duplexers, but one needs to know what they provide
and what they do not.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
retuned our 6 can full sized 2 meter duplexer
>for our new 400 kHz split, they were happy to hear that it was a
>digital system and the deepest and narrowest notches could be used to
>achieve maximum notch.
>Ernie
>W6KAP
>
>
hi all,
Here is some info a friend of mine made to the ICOM DStar repeaters
to make it perform better.
73, ron, n9ee/r
The loss isn't the problem. It's that Icom is using a single shield
cable, that's only 60% shielded, so the problem is desense -in- the
box itself.
What's the loss differe
;The Labor Day Hurricane of 1935, and Hurricane Andrew in 1992. Both
>were category 5s, and both hit south Florida.
>
>73 de W4AS
>Sebastian
>
>On Jun 27, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Ron Wright wrote:
>
>> Not sure what Cat 5 hurricane you were in. There has never been a
>&
Not sure what Cat 5 hurricane you were in. There has never been a Cat 5
hurricane hit Florida going back over 100 years. Sure there has been one,
maybe within last 100,000 yrs, hi. Kertina was Cat 5, but down to Cat 4 before
hitting New Orlenes.
I remember Charley in 2004. Was headed right
Have not read the DStar FD rules, but do DV Dungle?, computer to repeater to
user contacts count for points???
If testing for emergency comm would think so for this mode would be used in
disaster just like Echolink and IRLP have been used in some disasters here. It
has been found Echolink is v
r, but not from
>anything or anyone else. Even then, you only get about 65dB of
>isolation... so you better be using low power.
>
>They work "well" for portable repeaters and duplex subscriber units...
>real repeaters use real duplexers.
>
>Lee
>
>
demo its usefulness.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
As stated access to the internet from your local connection will probably not
be aviable if a Katrina or the like hits. The internet will be there, just the
last mile will not.
Some here with D-Star are thinking of RF linking to distant city DSTar
repeaters for the gate way; a link or remote b
Mobile duplexers work very well.
Repeaters have been built for years with the mobile duplexers inside the
repeater enclosure with very good performance. If replacing the cables and
moving outside I would think the cables were the problem and not where the
duplexer was.
Since you replaced the
Craig,
When you loose power at your home most of the other areas around you most often
have power and yes your internet might work.
For New Orleans after Katrina type of event all for miles around you is down
and I would not expect any service to work. Your battery/AC converter will
make your
Tony and all,
Here in Tampa Bay, Florida, area we have a number of cable providers that offer
cable, internet, phone, etc. on one cable.
I have Verizon FIOS which is a fiber optics to the home and I subscribe to
cable TV, internet at 3 Mb and phone. The phone is high, but the others are
compe
DAve Anderson, you need to jump in here now.
Dave mod'd ICOMs D-Star repeaters to make them work as they should. His input
would be good.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
This loss is about .11 db/ft, little more than RG58. If one used RG223 (double
shielded RG58) the loss would be about the same.
Going to RG214 loss would be .05 db/ft, an improvement.
All this is at 400 MHz.
At 400 MHz the .11db loss would be .63 watts from 25 watts. I don't think much
impro
mode.
This was the reason the ARRL in 2007 attempted to get FCC approval for wide
band modes on bands down to 6 meters...it would open up more modes for high
speed. So many opposed it due to thinking single ops would be occupying large
chunks of spectrum.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Ron Wright, N9EE
727
Joe,
Again the problem is the ICOM controller does not interface as most controllers
do. The ICOM does not put out ptt/cos/tx & rx audio...it puts out a serial
data stream the ICOM repeaters read and decode as commands, data, etc. As
serial command to say key repeater, etc.
If you decoded th
think best let ICOM take care of it,
but might be months to fix.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
the
>transmitter or other transmitters at the site... the way to do that is
>well-documented and discussed by analog repeater builders all the time
>at http://www.repeater-builder.com
The RF part is still the same Physics. Analog or Digital one is transferring
information with RF. Ju
to receive.
>>
>>
>>
>
>--
>John D. Hays - K7VE
>Phone: 206-801-0820
>Fax: 866-309-6077
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>VOIP/SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
Maybe already ask, but have you monitored the RF power out to make sure it
comes up right away???
If it does not then you are dealing with a weak signal at first.
73, ron, n9ee/r
>From: garyp609 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 2008/06/18 Wed PM 07:02:26 EDT
>To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
>Sub
He is desensing the monitoring rcvr making him think the repeater is not
transmitting. Bet if he looks at the S-meter he will see signal, but audio
does not open. Typical problem when listening to a repeater while txng on
another rig on another freq.
73, ron, n9ee/r
>From: Nate Duehr <[EM
ICOM locked their products to work together.
The ICOM D-Star controller does not put out typical controller logic and audio.
It talks to its repeaters with a CAT5 cable in a digital control
format...serial data. This data is broken down in the repeaters radios and
used for control...told when
e
>> using cruddy Comet antennas hooked to 9913 or worse, and using small
>> low-Q "mobile" duplexers. (Hopefully not all three of those
>mistakes at
>> the same time, but I bet there's at least one example of that out
>there!)
>
>
Ray,
I aggree FD is a contest, but with the setup required to do a real FD, which so
many do, one does get the training in setting up an emergency station. One
learns about not only the radio set up, but feeding the animals, bath rooms
that are not always what one wants, bugs, generators and n
. The repeater part would be the problem.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
Ed,
I do not believe FD has been diverted from “developing skills to meet the
challenges of emergency preparedness as well as to acquaint the general public
with the capabilities of Amateur Radio". I feel it still gives good practice
of setting up an emergency station, testing that station and
d to hearing you during D-STAR Field Day!
>
>Ed WA4YIH
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
from their test it did
not do as well mobile/HT use fro good voice comm. Cel phones use it primarily
for muplexing more on one carrier.
Time will tell.
73, ron, n9ee/r
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone, all are welcome.
[ED - Can
HOwever, adding a PA can reduce the affects of multi-path. With multi-path a
resultant reduction in signal can be the issue.
By adding power the results can be such that the signal can be recovered.
73, ron, n9ee/r
>From: "John D. Hays" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 2008/06/13 Fri PM 09:27:45 E
Nate,
I think the issue is not how many bars you get, but if one gets any bars at
all. Increasing the power on the TX can increase the probablility of getting a
bar. Of course the nice thing about digital it don't matter if 1 or more bars,
assuming no other interferring critter. It is getting
Bill,
I am involved in ARES type public safety, but not police, etc. I don't
consider ARES public safety, but public service maybe.
I understand if your users are HT users only then one designs to that. Then
you might still have one large xmtr, but many rcv sites.
In Ham Radio we are not tha
Although I tend to work on the antenna and receiver more, having higher power
from the tx can be necessary.
I never design a system for HTs. If a user is too lazy to put on a rig with
some power, don't have to be 100 W, then why should I worry about him.
I try to design with good low noise xmt
I have been trying to figure out where to put my info in the IC91AD that
gets displayed on the users radio. I have my callsign and name, but
cannot put more info. Any ideas???
73, ron, n9ee/r
Ron Wright, N9EE
727-376-6575
MICRO COMPUTER CONCEPTS
Owner 146.64 repeater Tampa Bay, FL
No tone
57 matches
Mail list logo