e to separate the UUT emissions
>from
>the environment?
>In my experience (assuming you do not gave a shielded room)this could save up
>to
>50 percent of the testing time.
>(A shielded room has its own problems of course re emissions a
What the German public perceives as being an approval mark
>--
>From: mvald...@netvision.net.il[SMTP:mvald...@netvision.net.il]
>Sent: 04 April 1997 07:58
>To:emc-p...@ieee.org
>Subject: FW: RE: Ergonomic requirements
>
>What is the significance of
safety issue, so
compliance is required.
--
From: mvald...@netvision.net.il
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: FW: RE: Ergonomic requirements
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Friday, April 04, 1997 1:58AM
What is the significance of "legal requirement in Germany" at a tim
Hello,
You might use clause 2.4 of IEC950 or clause or clause 6.3.1.2 of
IEC1010 depending what standard is valid for your equipment. LIMITED
CURRENT CIRCIUT. In this way you should be able to avoid the use of
transformer or optocoupler.
This enables you to measure on AC (primary) and connect
1998 5:49 PM
> To: dir...@patriots.east.sun.com; gmcintu...@packetengines.com;
> s_doug...@ecrm.com; Gary McInturff
> Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: Re[2]: Peripherals
>
>
> I heard from the test lab that you can use a "good system" as your
>
.org
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Thursday, September 03, 1998 10:36 AM
Subject: Re[2]: Peripherals
>
> I heard from the test lab that you can use a "good system" as your
> peripherals to test your EUT rather than test it with a "worst system"
&g
gmcintu...@packetengines.com writes:
>Rick,
<>
>But they can also be reduced to such a small power output, 50
>mW that they should not be harmful.
Gary,
For the most part your comments are relatively accurate. Some comments
added:
1. Laser safety is covered in 21 CFR 1040.10 for the US. Th
kazimier.gawrzyjal.k...@nt.com writes:
>Hi Scott,
>
>I have a question for you:
>
>The e-mails below refer to IEC 825 or EN60825 which I've seen before but
>are
>there any US federal requirements (CFR??) you're aware of that have to be
>met when trying to categorize a laser device..or even just the
Yes... CFR 21.
> -Original Message-
> From: s_doug...@ecrm.com [SMTP:s_doug...@ecrm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 1998 8:44 AM
> To: kazimier.gawrzyjal.k...@nt.com
> Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: Re: RE: Laser pointers
>
> kazimi
EN61000-4-6 has been issued, in addition it has been reference in the current
versions of the draft generic specifications (october 1996 - EN50082-1) and
(august 1996 - EN50082-2).
Regards Andy Griffin
EMiSoft Limited - Test and Assessm
We may be able to get away with nails because we are not going above
1Ghz. At that frequency one quarter wavelength is about 3 inches.
Go much above that frequency and 2 inch nails start looking like a short,
which would reflect and mess up the readings.
Bill Franklin wfrank...@bb-elec.com
RE>(Fwd) Re: NPF Returns 30/4/96
--
To Chris Dupres + emc-pstc
I had to ask a similar question regarding shipment of pre-1996 equipment
around Europe and possibly back to the US for repair. I asked my lo
Hello Gordon,
Indeed most of the environment is coming from within the building, is
unpredictable, changes during the day, and sometimes has frequencies similar or
identical to the UUT (since some of it is generated by similar equipment).
The TV/Radio type of environment is normally not the proble
Hello Gordon,
Indeed most of the environment is coming from within the building, is
unpredictable, changes during the day, and sometimes has frequencies similar or
identical to the UUT (since some of it is generated by similar equipment).
The TV/Radio type of environment is normally not the proble
I think what we need are some engineer biased "Cliff notes" for the popular
standards such as the IEC 1000-4-X, series (especially -6).
Seriously, there is something wrong with the process of developing
standards where minute changes are added in layer after layer. Those
involved in the proces
Forwarded to: imail[emc-p...@ieee.org]
cc:
Comments by: JOHN ALLEN@1113_E@ENG_ATL
Comments:
Sorry if this is a repeat, my intranet is kind of flakey right now.
===
Forwarded to: im
%>
%>
%> I suspect (but don't know for sure) that the accuracy of a transformer
is
%> the way it performs, relative to it's spec's, rather than relative to
its
%> history. That is, a _given_ transformer may be extremely accurate once
%> calibrated, but the _initial_ accu
inal Message Follows
>> Date: 04-Jan-97 23:02:10 MsgID: 1039-126606 ToID: 72146,373
From: Paul Rampelbergh >INTERNET:rampelberg...@infoboard.be
Subj: Re[2]: Shiep rules
Chrg: $0.00 Imp: Norm Sens: StdReceipt: NoType: Text
Sender: owner-emc-p...@mail.ieee.org
Received: from ruebe
> Date: 05 Jan 97 20:35:39 EST
Hi Cortland.
You wrote:
> Don't you agree it is fair to have one set of laws for everyone?
>
> Don't you agree we should be able to listen to radio even if the neigbhor
> turns
> on his computer?
>
Here my natural cynicism comes out...
Don't lose sig
were listening to their power lines at
the french embassy in UK and decoding their teletype transmissions!!! (in the
1950's!)
Best Regards
Hans
__ Reply Separator _
Subject: Re[4]: Shiep rules
Author: Non-HP-owner-emc-pstc (o
Views expressed by the author do not necessarily represent those of
Sensormatic.
> --
> From: Richard Cass[SMTP:richard_c...@iris.scitex.com]
> Reply To: Richard Cass
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 1998 10:11 AM
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
wo...@sensormatic.com writes:
>
>
> Thanks for posting the information. The message from Argentina
>indicated that they were attaching files of the Declaration. It would be
>very helpful if you could locate and post those files. Thanks.
>
>
>> Richard Woods
>> Sensormatic Electronics
>> wo...
swers your question.
Regards,
Ryan Kim
-Original Message-
From: bharat_s...@logitech.com
To: hait...@soback.kornet21.net
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Thursday, October 01, 1998 5:55 PM
Subject: Re[2]: Korea Homologation
>Hello,
>I have following question for
.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 1998 5:07 PM
To: Non-HP-emc-pstc
/HP-PaloAlto,mimegw3/dd.HPMEXT1=emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org; Non-HP-G14342
/HP-PaloAlto,mimegw3/dd.HPMEXT1=g14...@ga25epd.mot.com
Cc: Non-HP-ed.price /HP-PaloAlto,mimegw3/dd.HPMEXT1=ed.pr...@cubic.com
Subject: Re: Plugs
To: Non-HP-dwight.hunnicutt
/HP-PaloAlto,mimegw3/dd.HPMEXT1=dwight.hunnic...@vina-tech.com; Non-HP-plawler
/HP-PaloAlto,mimegw3/dd.HPMEXT1=plaw...@west.net; Non-HP-emc-pstc
/HP-PaloAlto,mimegw3/dd.HPMEXT1=emc-p...@ieee.org
Cc: Non-HP-bousquet /HP-PaloAlto,mimegw3/dd.HPMEXT1=bousq...@cm.ksc.co.th
Subject:
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Richard Cass
Sent: woensdag 11 november 1998 14:21
To: lfresea...@aol.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org; James, Chris
Subject: Re[2]: Laser pointers
I rencently heard in the news that ground based lasers used in Kosovo
(sp?)
area to harrass aircraft doi
OK,
perhaps the comparison to foods strayed from the context a little, a sign of
the sue happy world we live in...
However, what about power tools, you could inflict harm with a paper knife for
goodness sake. Anyone remember all the fuss when superglue came out?
The point is that for a few small
ed.pr...@cubic.com writes:
>Bob:
>
>You stress the importance of discrete ferrite absorbers placed closely
>along the antenna cable. The obvious extension of this thought is to have
>a special antenna coaxial cable which has ferrite material continuously
>distributed along its external surface.
>
>
Hi Glyn:
Two comments:
1) In a power cord, two conductors must be identified, one
being the protective earthing conductor, the other being
the neutral conductor (assuming a polarized connection
to the supply).
Here are the required identification colors according to
Eur
Bob
As far as I can remember he said that the document was being
issued for comment. Once this had been done and the comments recieved
and reviewed it would be passed to the council of ministers for
ratification. It appeared though that it would be issued as a whole
not in parts.
If you
c04688.pcx)
Please respond to "Brian Harlowe"
To: ed.pr...@cubic.com
cc: emc-p...@ieee.org (bcc: Robert E. Heller/US-Corporate/3M/US)
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: SLIM III
Hi Ed and group
I attended a meeting at ERA technology here
Hi Ed and group
I attended a meeting at ERA technology here
in the UK on Monday. They are one of the leaders on the
legislation/standards associated with the various directives
associated with the EU.
One of there people who sits on the various committees gave us a
brie
1998 11:37 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:RE: Re[2]: Upcoming EMC Seminar
I would vote to allow a continuation of posting of EMC/safety seminars.
This is valuable information and Henry Ott, for instance, is certainly a
prestigious contributor to the field.
On the flip side, though, I
If such a system is not easy to find, is there any reason why one can't use
two systems to test an expansion card?
One could be CE marked and declared for Class B ( a PC) and the
other could be a system that is CE marked and declared for Heavy
Industrial Immunity. In this way, you have shown the
I have tested systems to the heavy industrial immunity specification which
included class B PCs. Both HP Vectra computers and Dell computers faired
well. Ocassionally the monitors sold with these systems are disturbed to
the point of turning themselves off (a failure in most books). To date
I've
Hi Kevin,
We Mitsubishi PC do test to those standard (EN55022 B and EN50082-2) for
EMC. Our best PC (for EMC) is the LS660 mintower range, we managed to
get more than 4dB margin (emissions) in a test house in Germany.
We also supply high quality 17" Mitsubishi monitor that performs very
well for
Jon,
That's great information--I also anticipate a requirement for heavy
industrial immunity in the future and have been wondering what problems I
might be in for.
With PCs (and computers in general), isn't it the case that if the cables are
shielded and grounded to the cabinet there isn't likel
Max,
PCs have been subject to close US and German scrutiny since at least 1980.
That has forced them to adopt very good shielding practices including
direct connection of the shields to the cabinet in a low inpedance
fashion. Anyone in the industrial controls area who needs to get up to
speed on
Hello Moshe,
TUV Rheinland of North America provides full testing for SEMI S2-93a (latest
version) and SEMI S8 ergonomic requirements, including environmental hazard
evaluations. Please contact me directly and I will have information sent to
you.
Patty Elliot
TUV Rheinland of N.A.
ell...@tuv.com
moshe valdman wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm interested in the SEMI S2-93 (requirements for safety,
> EMC, environment and other hazards for semiconductor
> manufacturing equipment).
>
> Can someone give some background on this? Is there some
> source of information on the Net? Is there a lab
Good Question. The best information I have is that you can expect the
release of prEN50082-1(1996) mid to late this year. However, the real
question is - what is the transition time? Currently the transition time
(i.e. when the old standard MUST be withdrawn) is four years!!. So if
that holds the 1
Contact one of the TUV offices. They should be able to help you.
--
From: Edward Cullen
To: 'emc-p...@ieee.org'
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Thursday, August 07, 1997 4:26PM
Does anyone know where I can obtain copies, IN ENGLISH, of ZH1/618
10.80, the German Equipment Safe
> In my opinion there is no randomness to EMC emissions. Every moving
> electron results in an electromagnetic emission. The electrons do not move
> randomly. A device may
> create the exact same emissions at symmetrical or asymmetrical intervals.
> This can give the appearance of "randomnes
Ed,
That's about it. As Yogi Berra once said, "You can observe a lot just by
watching".
However, we do not watch for EMI emissions systematically. Unless the
beginnning of the time averaged measurement is synchronized with a
re-occurring event in the equipment, each measure
The standards organization is ABNT
Comitê Brasileiro de Eletricidade - COBEI
Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas - ABNT
Rua Líbero Badaró, 496 - 3.o andar
Caixa Postal 8363
São Paulo, SP, CEP 01008
Brasil
The agency regulating radio/telecommunication is Anatel
Agencia Nacional de Telecommun
Mike:
FAR to me means "Federal Acquisition Regulation" which is in the
contracts domain. Ask a suit at your company.
Regards,
Jack
Jacob Z. Schanker, P.E.
Director of Agency Compliance
Microwave Data Systems
175 Science Parkway
Rochester, NY 14620 USA
+716 242 8454 (voice)
+716 241 5590 (fax)
j
Jeff,
"id" stays for idem (Latin), an identical item or ditto.
Values are the same in one box, for example -15% / +20% in upper left
box, -15% / +10% in lower left box, etc.
"R" stays for "Recommended use" and is given in the box above two
relevant columns.
Regards,
Mirko Matejic
Lordy - Lordy
(Since when does the opinion of compliance engineers carry any weight with the
Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJ) ?)
OSHA regulates federally controlled enterprises. Electrical equipment needs to
be listed/certified by a Nationally Recognized Test Laboratory. The NRTL DOES
; cortland.richmond-cc
Subject: RE: Re[2]: Computer board tests
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Friday, December 13, 1996 10:38AM
There is more information in Amendment A1 that I maybe should have quoted
last time
"The Host shall be a typical compliant production sample"
"PWBA
There is more information in Amendment A1 that I maybe should have quoted
last time
"The Host shall be a typical compliant production sample"
"PWBA intended to be class B shall not be tested in hosts which are
class A"
"The accompanying documentation shall include information regarding the
hos
strated to meet the requirements."
That's it! No reference to assuring anything that the testing can not
practically assure..
Regards,
tony_fredriks...@netpower.com
--
From: Cortland.Richmond-CC
To: cblackha; emc-pstc; martin; Tony Fredriksson
Subject: Re[2]: Computer board
> 1. Although the FCC have adopted the CISPR limits, the limits as specified in
>Title 47 Part 15 are TIGHTER for both conducted & radiated. OK. So if ones
>product had margin & passes both then everythings fine.
>
>BUT...What happens if a products passes CISPR & FAILS FCC. Now what?
rv.ieee.org
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 16:11:48 -0500
Subject: Re: EMI Compliance - Need to Re-
Reply-To: mmert...@modicon.com.smtp
Priority: normal
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.01)
>
> 1. Although the FCC have adopted the CISPR limits, the limits as specified in
>
10:28:55 +
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: EMI Compliance - Need to Re-Test
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Priority: normal
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.23)
Sender: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org.smtp
Precedence:
Reply to: RE>>FWD>RE>>Limited Power Sourc
Egon, et al
My typo. I intended to say, "above 20 V, the maximum fuse size..."
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver
Northern Telecom, Inc.
peter_tar...@nt.com
--
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
: 1046-127744 ToID: 72146,373
From: INTERNET:doug.kea...@sciatl.com >INTERNET:doug.kea...@sciatl.com
Subj: Re[2]: ATX Power Supply
Chrg: $0.00 Imp: Norm Sens: StdReceipt: NoParts: 1
Pardon my ignorance, but what is meant by "ATX form factor"?
Just when I tho
ATX is a newer form factor for PC Motherboards and
power supplies. I believe you can find a good deal
of detail on this issue on Intel's website.
regards,
tony_fredr9iks...@netpower.com
--
From: Doug.Kealey
To: 72146.373; emc-pstc
Subject: Re[2]: ATX Power Supply
List-Post: emc
Message Follows
>> Date: 25-Mar-97 13:03:13 MsgID: 1046-128857 ToID: 72146,373
From: INTERNET:doug.kea...@sciatl.com >INTERNET:doug.kea...@sciatl.com
Subj: Re[4]: ATX Power Supply
Chrg: $0.00 Imp: Norm Sens: StdReceipt: NoParts: 1
Cortland,
Thanks so
Cc:jim.nado...@amp.com
>Subject: Re[2]: alternate test sites
>
> Regarding your "cute footnote":
>
> The same could be stated for certain husbands.
>
> I suggest that you show greater consideration to people; it has been
> many
test-drive them before I buy them.
>
>
>
> Jon Bertrand
> j...@cirris.com
>
>
>__ Reply Separator
_
>Subject: Re: Scope ofstandards
>Author: "Farnsworth,Heber"
MTP:marti...@perkin-elmer.com]
>Sent: Thursday, September 11, 1997 9:02 AM
>To:Mark Briggs; george.da...@unisys.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
>Subject: Re[2]: EMC/Harmonics requirements
>
>In regards to the implementation dates for EN 61000-3-2 and EN 61000-3-3, I
>
ATECH
__ Reply Separator _
Subject: RE: Re[2]: Scope of standards
Author: pa...@stock.com
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:8/22/97 5:35 PM
A suggestion that worked for me is to contact your local major city or college
library to s
(Chaz) on Fri, Sep 12, 1997 8:34 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: EMC/Harmonics requirements
To: 'Mark Briggs'; 'george.da...@unisys.com'; 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org';
'MartinJP'
The application date of EN61000-3-2/3 for ITE has been a difficult
problem to resolve.
655
V: 408-565-2453
F: 408-565-2575
> -Original Message-
> From: jly...@gtech.com [SMTP:jly...@gtech.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 28, 1998 11:04 AM
> To: Tarver, Peter [MPK:4S02:EXCH]
> Subject: Re[2]: EN 60950 A5
>
> Yikes! Global Engineering Documents i
lcos have been buying our equipment meeting UL1459 or UL1950, 3rd
edition.>>
--
From: ron_pick...@hypercom.com[SMTP:ron_pick...@hypercom.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 1998 5:16 PM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Cc: tgr...@lucent.com;
kshad...@cusa.canon.com writes:
>
> Scott:
>
> I would appreciate a copy of the .zip file. Do you know who created
> this program? Was it IRAM or S.I.C.&M (or other)? Can you confirm
> whether the resulting document will be acceptable (or required?!)
>for
> importatio
; From: ron_pick...@hypercom.com [SMTP:ron_pick...@hypercom.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 1998 1:37 PM
> To: emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: Re[2]: US NRTL required ?
>
> Hi Peter & Tania,
>
> "Require? No. Will they? Yes,". I'm intrigued. W
I'm just trying to get clarification. Please advise.
>
> Best regards,
> Ron Pickard
> ron_pick...@hypercom.com
>
>
> __ Reply Separator
> _
> Subject: RE: US NRTL required ?
> Author: "Peter Tarver" at I
: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 08:05:54 -0500
Subject:Fwd: Re: Indicator color standard
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
From: s_doug...@ecrm.com (Scott Douglas)
Send reply to: s_doug...@ecrm.com (Scott Douglas)
> ffied...@granville.
Correction to my earlier post. It should read RG-58, RG-59 and RG-214.
Also, EMC Eupen has a New Jersey office:
EMC EUPEN
5033 Industrial Road, Bldg. 6
Farmingdale, NJ 07727
(732) 919-1100 Phone
(732) 919-7196 Fax
They appear to make cables of many types with the ferrite material just
un
[mailto:amich...@connix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 1998 4:32 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: lisa_cef...@mksinst.com
Subject:question (re: 98/37/EC
Hello Lisa,
98/37/EC is a re-issue
emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: lisa_cef...@mksinst.com
Subject:question (re: 98/37/EC
Hello Lisa,
98/37/EC is a re-issue of the original Machinery
Directive (89/392/EEC)
along with all of its amendments to
]
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 1998 10:39 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: lisa_cef...@mksinst.com
Subject: RE: question (re: 98/37/EC
Lisa:
There seems to be one difference. Can anyone verify how the date code
is to be displayed? As in the old directive, Directive 98/37/EC
requires the
and..
With regards to having the date on the product. does it actually have to
show the date in such a way as the customer can understand, or is a
serial number which is traceable to a manufactured date adequate enough??
-
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
product or DoC.
Regards,
From: "George, David L"
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Copies to: lisa_cef...@mksinst.com
Subject: RE: question (re: 98/37/EC
Date sent: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 10:39:04 -0500
Sen
Hope this helps to clarify things:
1. 98/37/EC is a consolidating directive which is intended only to make
clearer what the requirements of 89/392/EEC as amended by 91/368/EEC,
93/44/EEC & 93/68/EEC actually are.
2. I havn't had time to check this, but I think I am correct that 98/37/EC
is only a
cc:(bcc: George Alspaugh)
bcc: George Alspaugh
Subject: RE: Re[4]: Upcoming EMC Seminar
I would like to discuss the flip side as indicated below.
Consultants and companies own what is called intellectual property. It
is knowledge or processes gained through the sweat of costly
investig
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 1998 5:12 PM
> To: emc-p...@ieee.org; Max Kelson
> Subject: Re[4]: Upcoming EMC Seminar
>
> I second Max's presentation.
> Bogdan.
> bogdan.mat...@fibre.com
>
>
> _
My two cents worth
A brief announcement (perhaps on where to obtain more details) on upcoming
seminars (whether or not for $) is a service to those who need the
exposure/training. Such "advertising" to members of our community helps lower
the cost of those seminars to us (the recipients).
Im
which I think
might be useful to the forum. BTW, I am not presently a consultant...
but know one fairly well.
re: consultant's contributions (or lack thereof)
Perhaps the lack of contributions may be because they are "on the road"
for the simple reason that they are good at what t
com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 1998 8:56 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org; richard_c...@iris.scitex.com
Subject:Re[2]: Upcoming EMC Seminar
According to the Charter and Guidelines (10 March
1995)
"blatant or
Subject:Re[2]: Upcoming EMC Seminar
According to the Charter and Guidelines (10 March 1995)
"blatant or
overt advertising of goods or services is not permitted".
I think
this is a good rule. This should not be a forum for "f
Pardon me while I step up on my soap box... (My opinion only)
I was party to the major dog fight over background color that occurred
during amendment of IEC 1010-1. A highly-placed person on the committee
was British, from BSI I think. The BSI standard for warning signs that
originally se
Gentlemen,
For another source of "positive guided relays", please try Henglster,
models H-46 series or
Siemens SR series.
The EN norm is a draft, pr EN 50205 and the German national standard that
these "Positive guided relays" must meet is ZH 1/457.
Unfortunaltey, I do not have an address or p
power pack, is it necessary to have
> the product re-tested for EMI with the new power pack for sale in the USA?
The FCC's position on this matter is very clear. The FCC considers
the total unit, including the power supply, to be the Equipment Under
Test.
The FCC rules state that comp
_
Subject: EMI Compliance - Need to Re-Test
Author: rod.ma...@datacraft.com.au at internet
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:8/29/96 20:31
Hello all,
We have a product for non-residential use that is powered by a line
frequency a.c. power pack. With a 230 V a.c. power
It depends...
As I understand the FCC rules, there are expections built in. If your product
fall under that category you're OK & probably don't have to test for US
shipments.
If NOT then you do need, as a minimum, conducted data @ 115V 60Hz to prove
that you comply with the 55022 limits.
HELP...
On 28/8/1996 Art Kampmeier wrote:
>- A four year college degree in engineering?
> Product Safety is only a very small portion of the
> curriculum.
Actually, four years is not enough. Most fresh engineering graduates are quite
useless to the company that hires them. It takes another few year
Item Subject: Re[2]: OSHA Laser Safety Requirements
Hello Ken,
Check out the OSHA Web Site at:
http://www.osha.gov
You will need to determine your Standard Industrial Classification
(SIC) number by searching the OSHA SIC database at:
http
Ken,
I do not believe OSHA has a regulation on lasers for general industry. The
construction regs., 29 CFR 1926, have specific requirements in regards to
qualified personnel, PPE, etc.
The ANSI Z136 guidelines are generally accepted has the minimum for meeting
the OSHA requirement of providi
)661-7115
>--
>From: tania.gr...@octel.com[SMTP:tania.gr...@octel.com]
>Sent: Monday, July 14, 1997 11:51 AM
>To:emc-p...@ieee.org; Alan Hudson +44 (0)1383-821921
>Cc:jim.nado...@amp.com
>Subject: Re[2]: alternate test sites
>
> Regarding your "
grant.pi...@adn.alcatel.com wrote:
>
> Just curious, but what is a Shiep?
Hi,
I had comments on the EMC rules making people and the BIPT (Belgium FCC)
irresponsible autocratic, dictatorial, monopolistic bureaucratic
institutions.
I never have put in doubt the requirement of rules, only the way
TUV
certified?
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
Loh Weng Wah
Creative Technology Ltd
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 97 13:33:42
From: "Mike Kuo"
To:emc-p...@ieee.org, "Jim Hulbert"
Subject: Re[2]: EMC REGULATION
Glyn Garside provided some very good background on house
wiring in the U.K.
He posed a couple of questions...
> It would be interesting to know if the US approach (low-cost GFI on new
> hairdryers) ultimately achieves the same rate of bathroom electrocutions
> (all devices, not just dryer
s the research project of
many hacks. The windows OS does many things at seamingly random intervals.
Hans
__ Reply Separator _
Subject: Re[4]: modeling RFI sources "randomness"
Author: Non-HP-Moshe-Valdman (moshe_val
gt; To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: spec'ing OEMs, Was: Re: Power Factor
>
> Another nice thing to specify to vendors is the MARGIN you expect the
> full
> system to have versus the limits when the OEM part is installed into
> your
> equipment.
>
> we tr
manufacturers who are or may be
required to obtain UL Listing Marks, the times of the UL monopoly are not
quite over.
Regards.
--
> From: Matthias R. Heinze
> To: rlanz ; emc-p...@ieee.org
> Subject: RE: Who's responsibility.
> Date: Friday, August 14, 1998 12:25 PM
>
&
Scott:
Yes, I do think we have been talking a bit beyond you. Somehow, the comments of
the past couple of days have been making the assumption that you had an
HP-8566B or an HP-8568 or maybe an HP-8571 spectrum analyzer or receiver
system. I think that this assumption started when you said that
p well at night (now). Hope this helps.
Don Umbdenstock
Sensormatic
> --
> From: s_doug...@ecrm.com[SMTP:s_doug...@ecrm.com]
> Reply To: s_doug...@ecrm.com
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 1998 3:14 PM
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: Re
For what it is worth... I own GriD laptop computer whose
bottom casting is magnesium. GriD was famous for its
rugged, magnesium computers -- and they were sold worldwide.
I do recall an insulating plastic sheet between the board
and t
1 - 100 of 3307 matches
Mail list logo
