-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ghesk...@wdtv.com [mailto:ghesk...@wdtv.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 9. September 2011 13:27
An: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Betreff: Re: [Emc-users] M3/M4 and M5
Hi Gene,
I'm sorry if you have troubles with my mails.
The clock in my computer
is set korrect to European
On Sunday, September 11, 2011 08:41:59 AM Peter Georgi did opine:
Hi Gene,
From your mail I take, that you change from
daylight saving time at the beginning of
October. In Europe we change to normal time on
the last weekend of October. Though it would be
not so easy to fix the bug with
On 9/11/2011 6:07 AM, Peter Georgi wrote:
Hi Gene,
From your mail I take, that you change from
daylight saving time at the beginning of
October. In Europe we change to normal time on
the last weekend of October. Though it would be
not so easy to fix the bug with respect to all the
world
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:48:25AM +0100, andy pugh wrote:
As of yesterday, M67 is working (in the 2.5 branch and Master), if you
need to output an analogue value synchronous to motion.
(It had been quietly documented but non-functioning for quite a long time)
This is probably the way to go
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 23:34:59 -0700, you wrote:
When I tried it (before I discovered M67 wasn't working in 2.4) what I
found was that the motion planner slows down at each segment making it
useless for engraving. My theory (which I haven't verified in the code
because it's a bit of a maze to the
...@wdtv.com [mailto:ghesk...@wdtv.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2011 15:13
An: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Betreff: Re: [Emc-users] M3/M4 and M5
Thank you to all who helped. It works with S1.
Peter
Is the clock in your computer correct? Your
messages are causing a syntax error
On 9 September 2011 07:34, Ben Jackson b...@ben.com wrote:
When I tried it (before I discovered M67 wasn't working in 2.4) what I
found was that the motion planner slows down at each segment making it
useless for engraving.
As far as I can tell from my tests M67 does not change the motion
I think you made that up or like me have a poor memory for details or
the memory is of a previous lifetime or previous version of EMC. I can
never tell so I just have to look things up.
S and M3 4 5 can be on the same line as shown in the order of execution.
And I know having S and M3 works
http://www.linuxcnc.org/docview/html/gcode_overview.html#sec:Order-of-Execution
On 9/8/2011 6:40 PM, gene heskett wrote:
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 07:39:16 PM sa...@empirescreen.com did
opine:
Heh - I don't think so - I do S2000m03 all the time.
sam
I believe that because the line
Hi Gene,
I'm sorry if you have troubles with my mails. The
clock in my computer is set korrect to European
mean time, meaning two houres bevore UTC, becaus
we still have summer time. It is synchronized with
swisstime.ethz.ch.
Regards Peter
And there is the clue I was looking for. I am
On Friday, September 09, 2011 07:40:25 AM John Thornton did opine:
I think you made that up or like me have a poor memory for details or
the memory is of a previous lifetime or previous version of EMC. I can
never tell so I just have to look things up.
I am pretty sure John, but don't have
On 9/9/2011 7:09 AM, John Thornton wrote:
http://www.linuxcnc.org/docview/html/gcode_overview.html#sec:Order-of-Execution
Well, as long as we're quoting emc2 docs, how about farther down the
same overview page,
3.5 Don't put too many things on one line
Ignore everything in Section [the
I think you just need to issue a spindle speed command greater then zero
with your M3 command.
e.g.
M3 S100
...
M5
On 9/3/2011 9:27 AM, Peter Georgi wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm using EMC2_2.4.4 for my hotwire foam cutting
machine. Almost every thing runs fine and I'm very
happy with EMC.
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 07:20:45 PM Cliff Blackburn did opine:
I think you just need to issue a spindle speed command greater then zero
with your M3 command.
e.g.
M3 S100
...
M5
I don't think that will work, but this should:
...
S100
M3
...
M5
I believe it is written
Heh - I don't think so - I do S2000m03 all the time.
sam
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:25:34 -0400
gene heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com wrote:
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 07:20:45 PM Cliff Blackburn did opine:
I think you just need to issue a spindle speed command greater then zero
with your M3
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:05:31PM -0700, Cliff Blackburn wrote:
I think you just need to issue a spindle speed command greater then zero
with your M3 command.
net spindle-on= motion.spindle-on
net spindle-on = parport.0.pin-14-out
Yes, I've just done this myself for a laser cutter. `M3
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 07:39:16 PM sa...@empirescreen.com did
opine:
Heh - I don't think so - I do S2000m03 all the time.
sam
I believe that because the line is read from left to right, that your
version should also work.
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:25:34 -0400
gene heskett
On 9 September 2011 00:40, Ben Jackson b...@ben.com wrote:
Yes, I've just done this myself for a laser cutter. `M3 S1' is sufficient.
Originally I used M62/63/65 alone but the spindle-on interacts nicely with
job start/stop whereas a digital output will happily stay on.
As of yesterday, M67
gene heskett wrote:
I believe it is written someplace that setting the speed to a non-zero
value must be done at least a line before the Spindle on command is issued,
it has to be in effect when the Spindle On is given.
No, I am sure EMC has never required this. I have been using it for
a mailfilter bug that can't handle times the other side of
Grenich, but
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Chris Morley
[mailto:chrisinnana...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 3. September 2011 19:10
An: EMC
Betreff: Re: [Emc-users] M3/M4 and M5
This gives me in the Axis display
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:45:52 +0300, you wrote:
Kim, I am trying to build industrial machines with EMC. Explaining to
client, why do they need to specify S word in g-code file for a
welding robot, where it does not make any sense at all, is very very
difficult, after I have been telling them, how
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 03:12:00 -0500, you wrote:
Have you tried the RS274NGC section of the ini file as
described by section 4.2.4 of the integrators manual?
---
4.2.4 [RS274NGC] Section
PARAMETER_FILE = file.var The file which contains the
parameters used by
And, if properly built, they all can be considered as industrial machines.
Chris, thank You very much for the suggestion, I will check it out,
when I have a spare moment and will let You know, if any other
questions will arise.
Viesturs
If it ends up not setting the HAL pins at the
2011/9/4 Karl Cunningham ka...@keckec.com:
On 09/03/2011 12:37 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
Yes, You need to set spindle speed at least once in the code with S
word. I also had this situation...
I have a question, hopefully to start some discussion:
How hard would it be to remove (at least
Look in src/emc/motion
I see some code near the bottom of control.c
some where around the line number starting at 1739 of emc2.5
From: viesturs.la...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:28:59 +0300
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] M3/M4 and M5
2011/9/4 Karl
2011. gada 5. septembris 21:59 Chris Morley
chrisinnana...@hotmail.com rakstīja:
Look in src/emc/motion
I see some code near the bottom of control.c
some where around the line number starting at 1739 of emc2.5
Thank You!
I already changed my mind, because I do not understand, what is going
2011/9/5 Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com:
Look in src/emc/motion
I see some code near the bottom of control.c
some where around the line number starting at 1739 of emc2.5
Maybe 1499 of src/emc/motion/command.c ? That looks a bit easier, if
that bit of code is actually called by M3.
2011/9/5 andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com:
2011/9/5 Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com:
Look in src/emc/motion
I see some code near the bottom of control.c
some where around the line number starting at 1739 of emc2.5
Maybe 1499 of src/emc/motion/command.c ? That looks a bit easier, if
2011/9/5 Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.com
Maybe 1499 of src/emc/motion/*command.c* ? That looks a bit easier, if
that bit of code is actually called by M3.
For me line 1499 in [emc2.git] / src / emc / motion / *control.c* is in
the middle of a long comment.
;)
Andrew
On 5 September 2011 21:08, Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/9/5 andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com:
Maybe 1499 of src/emc/motion/***command.c***
--
atp
Torque wrenches are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men
2011/9/5 andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com:
On 5 September 2011 21:08, Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/9/5 andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com:
Maybe 1499 of src/emc/motion/***command.c***
Damn!!! My apologies!
Thanks, I will take a look.
Viesturs
expert with the guts of
EMC
From: viesturs.la...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 23:29:54 +0300
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] M3/M4 and M5
2011/9/5 andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com:
On 5 September 2011 21:08, Viesturs Lācis viesturs.la...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/9
regardless of what s is set at
Chris M
From: chrisinnana...@hotmail.com
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:52:30 +
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] M3/M4 and M5
The hal pins are changed in control.c
lines 1761 for spindle on
line 1762 for forward
line 1763 for reverse
2011/9/5 Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com:
HAL pin 'spindle on' is based on emc status of spindle speed * emc status
net_spindle_scale
In other words spindle is on if emc status spindle speed is not 0 - off if it
is 0
Which was why I thought it might be easier in command.c.
From: chrisinnana...@hotmail.com
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 22:08:50 +
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] M3/M4 and M5
Ok I lied it was really easy.
Three line change
remove line 1761 in control.c
add
*(emcmot_hal_data-spindle_on)=1;
after 1500
: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:52:30 +
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] M3/M4 and M5
The hal pins are changed in control.c
lines 1761 for spindle on
line 1762 for forward
line 1763 for reverse
HAL pin 'spindle on' is based on emc status of spindle speed * emc status
net_spindle_scale
In other words
Thank you to all who helped. It works with S1.
Peter
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Chris Morley
[mailto:chrisinnana...@hotmail.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 3. September 2011 19:10
An: EMC
Betreff: Re: [Emc-users] M3/M4 and M5
This gives me in the Axis display to buttons to
turn
Hi everybody,
I'm using EMC2_2.4.4 for my hotwire foam cutting
machine. Almost every thing runs fine and I'm very
happy with EMC.
To start the heating of the hotwire I use a relay,
wich is actuated by pin 14 through a break out
board, to switch the heating power on and off. The
hardware works
This gives me in the Axis display to buttons to
turn the spindle on and off. When pressing the two
buttons with the left mouse button or F9 the pin
14 followes the state of the buttons of the
display, maening going high and low. When trying
to turn the spindle on with M3 or M4, from the
2011/9/3 Chris Morley chrisinnana...@hotmail.com:
This gives me in the Axis display to buttons to
turn the spindle on and off. When pressing the two
buttons with the left mouse button or F9 the pin
14 followes the state of the buttons of the
display, maening going high and low. When trying
On 09/03/2011 12:37 PM, Viesturs Lācis wrote:
Yes, You need to set spindle speed at least once in the code with S
word. I also had this situation...
I have a question, hopefully to start some discussion:
How hard would it be to remove (at least with some special line in HAL
or INI file)
41 matches
Mail list logo
