RE: Recipient Policies

If there are problems with the RUS, generally you will see the errors while the System Attendant starts (because this is the process that manages the RUS). When troubleshooting RUS problems I generally only need to work with one RUS from the domain that is having the problems to see where the prob

RE: Exchange 2003 backups

ricked Backups!T > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Steve Molkentin > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 3:56 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups > > PST's can have pa

RE: Exchange 2003 backups

; > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups > > > > > > > > > This seems to be a popular axiom, buy why are they > considered bad ? > > > > > > How else can I give users access to emai

RE: Exchange 2003 backups

han useless. ;) > > -Original Message- > From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted > At: Thursday, January 08, 2004 5:56 PM Posted To: swynk > Conversation: Exchange 2003 backups > Subject: RE: Exchange 2003 backups > > PST's can have passwords put on

RE: Exchange 2003 backups

003 backups > > > > This seems to be a popular axiom, buy why are they considered bad ? > > How else can I give users access to email from 2 years ago ? > yes, they do need to access these. > > What do other organisations do ? > > Matt > > > -- > > >

RE: Exchange 2003 backups

PST = Bad. themolk. > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 9:21 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Exchange 2003 backups > > > Hi, > > I have just moved from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2003. > It is a single server set

RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics AGAIN MORE SPAM

You don't understand the definition of "spam" so I suggest that you may also STFU. --steve > -Original Message- > From: Troels Majlandt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 3:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: SV: Greg&

Flame Warriors

Given our current message volume. I'm sure we all remember these... http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame1.html --steve PS: Dude, STFU. Steve Hanna Network/Systems Administrator Niagara Plumbing Supply Company Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] There is nothing common

RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics

Dude, STFU. > -Original Message- > From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 11:51 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics > > > First, you have no credibility on the point. You find the > phrase "I fi

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Dude, STFU --steve > -Original Message- > From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 7:52 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 > > > People mis-characterize and read things into my pos

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Dude, STFU. --steve > -Original Message- > From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 3:58 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 > > > Yes, we did a phenomenal job for Marathon a

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Dude, STFU --steve > -Original Message- > From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:02 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 > > > Yes, really. Laws are designed to define

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Dude, STFU. --steve > -Original Message- > From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:20 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 > > > Titles are priceless. > >

RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5

Dude, STFU. --steve > -Original Message- > From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:44 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 > > > I will state this again for the 11 millionth a

RE: Unix/Linux Client for Exchange

r E2k IIS environment (shame on you if you have not). >From what I can tell...a very solid product. I would guess that with Novell picking up Suse as well...things should get very interesting in the distant future for the desktop environment. Best regards, Steve > Novell connects Linux deskt

RE: RUS problems.

once a day). I guess the real trick would be to use something like OWA to see if the new objects you created resolve\show up there. > Yes, but the only users using that are on Exchange 2003.=20 > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On B

RE: Single Use E-Mail?

hough this method is a good way to find out who does. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Single Use E-Mail? I dont think

Re: RUS problems.

You would not be using Outlook 2003 in cached mode would you? > Exchange 2k sp3 > > > I have a weird problem with my exchange 2000 RUS. When I create a new > Distribution Group and let the RUS do its thing, the group doesn't show > up in the default GAL. Even though the RUS stamped it with all

RE: Exch2003 GAL update problem?

doh! It is Friday right? Thanks Steve > Which version of Outlook? If it's Outlook 2003 in cached mode it's > because Outlook is using a OAB, which is only updated by default once a > night.=20 > > > Steve Evans > SDSU Foundation > > -----Original Mess

RE: Exch2003 GAL update problem?

Which version of Outlook? If it's Outlook 2003 in cached mode it's because Outlook is using a OAB, which is only updated by default once a night. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message----- From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 2:45 PM To

Exch2003 GAL update problem?

rough time figuring out why. My environment is a native Exchange 2003\Windows 2003 environment (inplace upgraded). Has anyone else seen this or have a suggestion on something that I might try or check? Thanks, Steve _ List posting FAQ

Exchange on the road

I let all the messages download, when he reconnects to the domain, will he get duplicates? Thanks, Steve Cobb _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin

RE: Exchange Limits

> One approach you might want to consider is educating your > users about the use of Personal Folders. Then, educate yourself about all the problems you will have with PST's... Remember, PST = bad. themolk. _ List posting FAQ:

RE: Exchange 2K & Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm

ger drives! Not sure why you want to > run eseutil. > How much space are you going to reclaim if you do? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:34 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Sub

Exchange 2K & Outlook 2K3 - increase in size of *.stm

All advice appreciated... We have recently introduced Outlook 2K3 into our Exchange 2000 environment. Our laptop users we have configured to run Outlook in "cached exchange mode". In the same time frame, our *.stm has exploded from about 1.5 GB to approx 9GB. The *.edb file has not grown (apart f

Re: Tumbleweed

I have used Tumbleweed's SecureMail in a 100,000+ seat Exchange shop and I can certainly vouch for them. Solid product with top notch performance. It backends on SQL, which allows for some pretty nifty stuff that you can do as an admin (assuming you know SQL...always a good time to learn). Out o

RE: Password Mainenance

Ouch., --steve > -Original Message- > From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:46 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Password Mainenance > > > No. > > We have always manually created the passwords

RE: Excluding specific email message types from backups

Yes, we are using brick level backups. Steve Iadarola Senior Support Specialist Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you saying that you are using brick-level backups

RE: Excluding specific email message types from backups

Has nothing to do with saving any money on backups. Steve Iadarola Senior Support Specialist Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http

RE: Excluding specific email message types from backups

. We would really like to stick with the exclude from backups if it is available. Steve Iadarola Senior Support Specialist Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] What I would do is make a separate storage group for

Excluding specific email message types from backups

nment? Any help or thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Steve Iadarola Senior Support Specialist Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 65 Hayden Ave Lexington, MA 02421 _ List posting FAQ:

RE: RE: Just Released - Digital Cable Descrambler 3899

Larry = pst = bad. themolk. P.S. I wish he was the M:\ drive... > -Original Message- > From: Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 17 October 2003 7:41 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: FW: RE: Just Released - Digital Cable Descrambler 3899 > > UNLOCK Digital Cable - F

Re: Trend's change to how it reacts to eicar

nding a live virus through SM to see if it quarantines stuff is what I > am left with…which isn’t gonna happen). > > I personally have big problems with this change (and the fact it was > forced on all Trend customers without making it some sort of option) and I > have told Trend my

RE: how does everyone fight this spam?

I'll third it. Though with a Sendmail/MailScanner/SpamAssassin combo. MailScanner does anti-virus also. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions I second this. We

RE: Trend's change to how it reacts to eicar

t. I honestly am not fond of using this hacked SmexVS.exe because I don't believe I should have to (and what happens with I upgrade to v6.2? There are some support issues that I still have to iron out). They should not have made this change IMHO. Anyhow...that is my rant and you have been wa

RE: Exchange 2003 & Clustering

Far from an endorsement (from me that is), but at TechEd there's was a lot of talk from Microsoft and HP about them running E2k3 clusters in house. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 3:

RE: How to find total number of mailboxes

Sorry, Exch 2000. Steve Iadarola Senior Support Specialist Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to find total number of mailboxes

How to find total number of mailboxes

Is there an easy way to get the total number of mailboxes I have in the organization across multiple servers? Is there a utility that I can run against the servers? Just looking for a total number of mailboxes without counting them all manually? TIA, Steve Steve Iadarola Senior Support

Re: New AV Gateway Recommendations

thing that you require). -Steve > I'm looking for a new AV gateway product. I'm looking for something that > has the following features. Right now we use NAI Websheild SMTP gateway > which does a pretty good job but is getting rather dated and it does not > appear that th

RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations

MailScanner with SpamAssassin. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations They didn't rank very high in Network Wo

Trend's change to how it reacts to eicar

t I am but a single voice. Anyhow...now you know if you did not before. Enjoy, Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=e

RE: Delegate "Sent on behalf of" is not being displaying

That was the issue. Thanks. Steve Steve Iadarola Senior Support Specialist Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 5:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delegate "Sent on behalf of&qu

RE: Delegate "Sent on behalf of" is not being displaying

Not sure. I will check with them in the morning. Thanks, Steve Iadarola -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 5:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delegate "Sent on behalf of" is not being displaying Ar

Delegate "Sent on behalf of" is not being displaying

and the Delegate are in the same OU and Storage Group. Anyone have any thoughts? TIA Steve Iadarola _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?e

RE: forward for a transaction

I'm a big fan of the fact that it is an "EXTREMELY BUSINESS TRANSACTION". ;) themolk. > -Original Message- > From: jerry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 26 September 2003 10:08 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: forward for a transaction > > > FROM DESK OF:MR.JERRY JO

RE: Exchange 2003 RBL

Matt, What does this have to do with the thread in place? Perhaps if you want help you need to send a new e-mail so that a new thread starts (or continue the thread this started on)?? I know those that will want to help will find it easier if this is the case. My $0.02 (inc GST). themolk. > -

RE: Exchange and SAN

Yeah but that's not necessarily because it was a SAN. If you double the number of disks the databases are on for example your going to see a performance increase, whether it's DAS or SAN. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: Exchange and SAN

Mark Twain said: "Put all your eggs in one basket, and watch that basket." Seriously though if you have good SAN hardware, the uptime on that equipment is amazing. You have to remember that everything is redundant. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Dean

RE: A CHALLENGE to the List

Ditto from an Aussie... themolk. > -Original Message- > From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 22 September 2003 8:08 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: A CHALLENGE to the List > > > I see the 10 to 12 looks like its gone, but I would be happy > to

RE: Exchange and SAN

ee. It will be interesting to see how quickly Exchange and iSCSI come along. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN I thought NetApp only

RE: Mailbox moves completed, but....

Where does AD say the mailbox is? Has c run on the old database lately? Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Duncan Scott Subject: Mailbox moves completed

RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security

It doesn't, but it keeps people from reusing credentials. At least I believe that's the posters point. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: Deckler wrote a book?!?

Tony, If you agree with Andy, then why not do something about it and CHANGE THE SUBJECT?! themolk. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 16 September 2003 9:16 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Deckler wrote a book?!? > >

Re: Strange behaviour after running ISINTEG

Glenn, I have seen this exact issue as well and the SIS hotfix does resolve it (after applying it and then running ISINTEG on each DB). When you run ISINTEG without the fix it will temporarily resolve the discrepancy between the "real" mailbox size and what is reported (thus the sudden mailbox si

RE: Another NAV for Exchange Question

It does. You list it as a file in a file filter, then don't check the box that says block (or something along those lines) Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:07 PM To: Exc

RE: E2K to E2K

Eric, Single mailbox, or whole server? If the latter, the FAQ has _THE_ method (EdC method). If the former, ExMerge is the goods - however note you will lose your SIS capabilities on the mailbox you move. themolk. > -Original Message- > From: Eric Holtzclaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: Mdeamon on my Network!

That's absolutely right - to quote the Great Ed... "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioural problems" A length of 2x4 is hardly technological, and supremely satisfying wielded in the hands of a frustrated IT admin. Win - Win! themolk. > -Original Message- > From: Mi

RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc..

gelabs, the goal was less administration which has turned out to be a myth with Messagelabs. I've used the Postfix in the past and will take a look at SpamAssasin again. Thanks for the reply! Steve > -Original Message- > From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday,

RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc..

Thanks for the reply, Raj. Are you letting your users control their own spam settings (I believe that Postini offers this), or do you control it company-wide? Thanks again, Steve > -Original Message- > From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2

RE: Messagelabs. Postini, etc..

tecting SPAM. We won't be using their spooling service. I > don't believe they offer an outbound solution. > > Aaron > > > -Original Message- > From: Steve Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:31 AM > To: Exchange Discussi

Messagelabs. Postini, etc..

-spam and anti-virus scanning service are good, the outbound mail has been very unreliable and we've actually moved our outbound back to our gateway SMTP servers as a result. Technical support has been poor as well. TIA for any commen

Re: 3 Layers of Virus protection.

When I was a messaging consultant I worked for a very large oil company (well over 100k seats) that had scanning done on the SMTP gateways and on the desktop, but nothing on the Exchange side (something like 120 e2k servers). From what I remember they had not had a email born virus outbreak\infect

RE: 3 Layers of Virus protection.

We have Messagelabs -> NAV for Gateways -> NAV for Exchange -> NAV Corporate on the desktops. Seems to work well as we've never had a virus reach one of the desktops. Steve > -Original Message- > From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday,

RE: Services Not Restarting After Reboot of Server

x27;t like the advise ask for a refund[1] [1] This was a quote sorry I can't remember who first made the statement. --steve > -Original Message- > From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 10:17 AM > To: Exchange Discussions &

Re: Trend? (Was Exchange Services).

I have to admit that Trend does tend to be the better product out there (from what I have heard and seen). I know Groupshield at a VERY intimate level (more then I would like to admit on this list) and I would recommend staying away from it personally. One thing to point out about Trend (and any

Perhaps OWA, perhaps not...

telnet to :80 on the box anymore. When I try to start the MMC for IIS I get an error cannot connect to mail "the data is invalid" Thoughts --steve Steve Hanna Network/Systems Administrator Niagara Plumbing Supply Company Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

Bob, Its all about IIS. That is the easiest way to remember it. Exchange 2000 cannot run on IIS 6.0, but Exchange 2003 can run on IIS 5.0. -Steve > What? I thought it was the other way around? > > OK, for those in the know, please clear this up. You upgrade Exchange > first,

Re: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

I do not believe you can install Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003. Windows 2003 runs IIS 6.0, which Exchange 2000 does not support. On the other hand Exchange 2003 can run on IIS 5.0. So the proper upgrade path is upgrade Exchange 2000 first and then upgrade the OS to Windows 2003. Thanks, Steve

RE: Running Exchange 2000 on Windows 2003

are running Windows 2000 SP3 or Windows Server 2003 Active Directory. So there is no requirement for AD to be hosted on a Win2003 box. The requirement to install Exchange 2003 first on a particular box is because Exchange 2000 does not work with IIS 6.0. -Steve > The real reason is that 2003

RE: Exchange 2000 ForestPrep Fails

Jamie, As I understand it, Forestprep is only meant to be run on a Windows 2000 domain... I am happy to be wrong, however. themolk. > > -Original Message- > From: Jamie Domingue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 1 August 2003 2:28 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Greetings,

Re: Forward all unknown email addresses to an external server

Erick, I believe what you are looking for is on the properties of the SMTP Virutal server in ESM. Go to the "Messages" tab and there is a field on the bottom titled "Forward all mail with unresolved recipients to host:". Thanks, Steve > I am in the process of moving fro

Re: Attachments and the Priv

Ok...I'm nitpickingbut just so the terminology is right...doesn't really store attachments as a "file" anywhere, but stores the data in a database with multiple pointers (if multiple people received the message). Best regards, Steve > Hi, > > I get asked this

RE: Strange calendar problems - Exchange 2000, Outlook 2002

Chris, Thanks for the response. I checked, and no, the user doesn't have mail delivered to a PST. The only PST in use is ARCHIVE.PST. Mail goes straight to the users' mailbox on exchange. Steve > -Original Message- > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: Export of Global Address List E2K

ectCategory=publicFolder) ))" -f output.ldf -l displayname This would query your AD server for all entries that would be in the GAL and dump the returned objects DN and their displayname. Enjoy, Steve > I am trying to export a list of all my users that have an active mailbox > that is vi

RE: OT - Beta EntourageX v10.1.4

Ditto... Particularly if this is the integration of Entourage to use an Exchange server properly! themolk. > > -Original Message- > From: Holstrom, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 31 July 2003 1:04 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > > I'd be interested in hearing about it

RE: Reccomended Black Lists

If you are using Sendmail as your message relay you could use greylisting. I have seen it work very well in a number of places...even large shops. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Bras

RE: RUS not working to child domain?

Joe, When you restart the SA are there any errors generated? If the RUS is going to spit out any initialization errors...this is when you would see them (learned this the hard way when I put a RUS on a mailbox server that also hosted over 5000 mailboxes a year or so ago). Initialization errors t

Strange calendar problems - Exchange 2000, Outlook 2002

y auto-cancel rules and found none. 2) I've scanned the workstation for viruses and found none. 3) Searched MS's knowledgebase and read anything I could find on canceled meetings. 4) Tried starting Outlook with the /celanfreebusy and /cleanreminders swi

RE: HOWTO: Block messages at server-side

Open ESM and browse to the SMTP VS of the server that receives inbound SMTP (or the SMTP VS to which you want the filter to be applied to) and open the properties of the SMTP VS. On the General Tab, next to the "IP address:" field there is an Advanced button. Click that and then select the net

RE: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}

t; To: Exchange Discussions > > LOL. I think it's hysterical. > - Original Message - > From: "Steve Molkentin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:16 PM > Subject: FW:

FW: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!}

?? I am just angry... themolk. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2003 8:14 AM To: Steve Molkentin Subject: Re: EMail Stamp Request for {RE: Help -- Login Scripts !!!} I use EMail Stamps to curb the flow of unwanted junk e-mail

RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging

18, 2003 10:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging Cisco won't authenticate to a PF. It requires a mailbox. -Original Message- From: Presley, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003

RE: Outlook/Exchange/VPN connectivity problem

Could not hurt to verify that RPC is working correctly using something like rpings. You could also configured a client that is normally having problems to used IMAP or POP and see if it goes awaycould be the VPN having problems with RPCs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma

RE: Back up Exchange WITHOUT backing up voice mail from Cisco Uni fied Messaging

Why not store the voice mail messages in public folders (each person gets their own of course) that live on a dedicated pf store for vm and set a different type of backup schedule for that pf store? You could also set up the folders so that they delete any messages in the folders that are over say

RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k

Is NetBIOS still enabled on the LAN connection facing the clients? -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 18 July 2003 15:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help. Can't connect to Exchange2k Go into your OUTLOOK client and change the connection from t

RE: Sending Secure Mail over the Internet

still meeting the requirement to transmit it securely over the Internet). Best regards, Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sending Secure Mail ove

Mail enabled public folder

Gurus, Ex2K - Native mode I have a mail enabled public folder (calendar) for a meeting room that I can e-mail when booking a meeting to ensure it is booked. This works, however it only tentatively accepts the meeting request. Some questions: - Can (and how, if so) can I get it to auto accept mee

RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up

Norbu Can you connect if you manually dial using dial-up networking to the local ISP, then use Outlook [in case it is an Outlook-DUN interconnection problem]? Cheers Steve -Original Message- From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 July 2003 12:38 To: Exchange

RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up

Boyz [do any of you have a real name?] Is the exchange server behind a firewall, preventing access via the internet? Steve -Original Message- From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 July 2003 13:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internet E-mail on dial-up

bridgehead/smtp best practices?

I seem to be involved in a bit of philosophical debate and want to get opinions from the field on this. Basically, I have some "service mailboxes" that I would prefer not to run on regular mailbox servers. These particular mailboxes do not hold any email, they are simply needed for the cirictal op

RE: Exchange 2000 invalid characters

Nope - that's just Andy. Up there with Martin & Ed as far as I am concerned when it comes to knowing their stuff. themolk. > -Original Message- > From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, 3 July 2003 8:29 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 inv

RE: Winmail.dat

> can try telling my users that and see if they buy it. :) > > -Original Message- > From: Steve Molkentin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 5:12 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > > Carmila, > > It's the international dateline - every tim

RE: Winmail.dat

Carmila, It's the international dateline - every time you send an e-mail to a group across it, it attaches the winmail.dat file so that when it is opened, it is read in the local time zone (and reflects that).[1] themolk. [1] Complete BS - but I couldn't help but throw it out there. > -Or

RE: how to cut down on spam

You forgot one... Tupperware = 100% themolk. > -Original Message- > From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 27 June 2003 1:34 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: how to cut down on spam > > > Death and Taxes = 100% > > -Original Message- > From:

RE: how to cut down on spam

Peter, That said, the latest on the Spammunition website is to suggest he is changing the logic so that there is no need to manually rescan. I agree the errors are frustrating - but the product is not bad for free for a client. themolk. > -Original Message- > From: Durkee, Peter [mailto

RE: Configuration Settings

Raji, >From my memory, the outlook bar shortcuts are stored in the user's profile (in application data > local settings (I think)). To specify a folder to start up in, go to: Tools > Options > Other > Advanced options - but I think it only allows to specify the big 7 (inbox, calendar, etc). I hop

5.5 on a WIN2000 Server

Currently running Exchange 5.5 on a Win NT 4.0 Server. Have just purchased a new Hardware platform for it. Compaq DL380 G3. Want to build the new server running WIN2000, but still want to remain using Exchange 5.5. I know 5.5 will run on 2000 but my dilema is that I want to build the new box exa

The latest from MS and Australia on sp@m

For those interested souls... http://www.thecouriermail.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5936,6619047%2 55E8362,00.html (link may wrap - but I hope not). themolk. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers

w how many people they actually get > prosecuted under this law. > > Aloha, > > -Ben- > Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 > Director of Information Services > Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert > http://www.hawaiilawyer.com > > > > -Original Message

RE: Brick level backups - legal disclaimers

rd that anyone should accept > the burden of responsibility > for receiving an electronic message that was sent to them by > mistake. And > those disclaimers that try to shift the burden of > responiblity from the shoulders of the sender to the reciever > are a sad attempt at just that.

  1   2   3   4   >