RE: Exchange 5.5/Arcserve backup

2001-10-31 Thread Robin Lawrie
Can't think why they don't like what you're saying William? ;-) -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 October 2001 16:19 To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5/Arcserve backup I think I am still on 6.61 sp1. Thanks. I also

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Drewski
Title: Message sounds like you need to upgrade to Exchange Enterprise. -- DrewVisit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis ad capul tuum saxum immane mittam. (I have a catapult. Give me all the money or I

RE: Mailing Lists

2001-10-31 Thread RZorz
Title: RE: Mailing Lists Where are your e-mail addresses for customers? Outlook, a database, etc? -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:46 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Mailing Lists Exchange is

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread RZorz
Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? But you don't need BLB's, you just need the IS and a cheap recovery server. -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE:

RE: OT - Pix Firewalls

2001-10-31 Thread Rick Ward - HQ
Make sure you use make this change in your PIX "IF" you're running Exchange 5.x or greater. It looks like your a college.. so I suspect you're not using Exchange. but here ya go just in case.. at PIX command line: "Conduit Permit tcp host x.x.x.x (the IP address of your Exchange

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Drewski
Tell them to pack sand. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! The probability that we may fail in the struggle ought not to deter us from the support of a cause we believe to be just. Abraham Lincoln -Original Message- From:

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Clark, Steve
Pack sand? I thought it was pound sand. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support,

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Drewski
Title: Message I go with the vendor. Exchange does online defragmentation automatically. One less thing for you to worry about. Eseutil is used in disaster recovery situations, and after large amounts of data have been moved off the server. That's all. --

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Drewski
And testing backups is way more important than restoring 91 day old mail anyway. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! Take time to deliberate; but when the time for action arrives, stop thinking and go in. One man with courage makes a

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Martin Blackstone
Title: Message I concur. I have only used it once in my career, and that was for fun on a box I was about to retire. -Original Message-From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:17 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
You're old. -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:23 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? So what! Practice your Disaster Recovery procedures. Your excuse is weak! I've

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Don Ely
Still, a lame excuse. Do you ever test your backups? Don't you think that would be a good time to do so? Restores are useless if your backups aren't any good. -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:52 AM To: MS-Exchange

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
You've educated your users. Some advise their users that IT can restore individual messages back 5 years. Just ask! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: How many of you

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Boswell Tim
Title: Message The best maintance for Exchange is apply service packs. other then that nothing needs to be done. shhh!!! My boss still thinks I work! -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: 31 October 2001 16:25To: MS-Exchange Admin

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Carstairs, Graeme
I always feel that if the User put a piece of normal paper mail in the bin. Then once been removed from their office by the cleaners and but in the buildings garbage. Would they be willing to go down to the local landfill site 6 months later and try to retrieve it??? So why once they have deleted

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Drewski
Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? Then change the DIR time., and tell them they need to get bigger drives. -- DrewVisit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!"Better to light a candle than to curse the darkness." Chinese Proverb

e-mail recovery

2001-10-31 Thread Gasparino, Michael (x2665)
Hello- If someone were to send out an internet e-mail, then delete it from both Sent Items and Deleted Items, is there a way to still retrieve it? The company is not ready to use a forensic resource yet. Are there any other options to do this? Michael Gasparino PBWT Work:

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Don Ely
The ! is there because Andrew doesn't know how to properly implement and maintain an Exchange server... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:29 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: How many of you use Message

RE: Pix Firewall

2001-10-31 Thread Jonathan
Title: Message Thanks everyone for your help and the suggestions. The disabling fixup on smtp prot has solved the issue for me. Jonathan -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:51 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
I don't think there is a specific limit for deleted item retention. The practical limit would be disk space. 9 days might be it, though. William -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Drewski
unless they can display a very great business need, they're out of luck. However, when I was still a sysadmin, I could have done that, running a disaster recovery onto a restore server. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! All Americans

RE: Mailing Lists

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
Exchange is not a full-featured list server unfortunately. Some tools: http://www.slipstick.com/exs/lists.htm William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Randy Lauritzen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 7:54 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:

RE: OT - Pix Firewalls

2001-10-31 Thread Ellery July
Get the Cisco Press DCN book and router sim program. The router simulation software will show you how to use IOS with Cisco Routers/Switches/Firewalls. -Original Message- From: Karen Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:21 AM To: MS-Exchange

RE: Exch5.5 and Linux firewall

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
It would be incorrectly simplified either way. Part of the process would be to utilise a more secure OS (by default) than ANY flavour/version/twist of Linux. For me, that would fall on the only OS I know to maintain the mandate of secure by default, OpenBSD. I certainly wouldn't want to keep a

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread RZorz
Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? You can do anything they want for a price. Change the deleted items to a 360 days. There are costs. You want to be able to restore back farther, than you need a backup plan that can handle it. Again, costs. -Original Message-

RE: NT 4 120 day eval situation

2001-10-31 Thread Andrew Duey
I think you just need to Upgrade this machine with a regular full version of NT4 (make sure it has SP6 in it). The upgrade will update the binaries to current versions but leave your configuration in place. --Andrew Duey, MCSE -Original Message- From: Schatz, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Carstairs, Graeme
I always feel that if the User put a piece of normal paper mail in the bin. Then once been removed from their office by the cleaners and but in the buildings garbage. Would they be willing to go down to the local landfill site 6 months later and try to retrieve it??? So why once they have deleted

Re: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Scott Schnoll
Title: Message Well, to be more specific Exchange's online defragmentation is great for defragmenting and reclaiming white space; however, this process does not reduce the size of the database file. So, if you move a large amount of data from your databases (e.g., you purge a whole lot

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread msharik
Commvault's implementation is not really BLB. IIUC, they actually duplicate the Exchange database including pointers and so can restore individual messages using that. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam:

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Message Sure. Some people reboot their servers weekly, too. For the average deployment, offline defragging using eseutil as a regular maintenance toolremains a complete waste of time and resources.(Read:reclamation of whitespace that will be reused anyway) William -Original

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Martin Blackstone
Tough s**t for them. What kind of a knob deletes and email and then needs it 90 days later? I wouldn’t do it. Period -Original Message- From: Andrew Goddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:14 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: How many of you

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
There is NO business that needs BLB. (MAYBE if you can afford Commvault) -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:52 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? Horses for Courses

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Martin Blackstone
Title: Message I edited your message so others wouldn't be lead to making mistakes. -Original Message-From: Scott Schnoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:57 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: Re: Eseutil Well, to be more specific

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread msharik
Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? damn straight! -MichèleImmigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - If We

RE: Exchange 5.5/Arcserve backup

2001-10-31 Thread Karen Palmer
There is a saying that the truth hurts. -Original Message- From: Robin Lawrie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Exchange 5.5/Arcserve backup Can't think why they don't like what you're saying William? ;-)

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Bill Higgins
Title: Message 16GB w/ Standard Edition Unlimited w/Enterprise Edition -Original Message-From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 09:50To: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil What is the Exchange 5.5 IS limit? 12

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Patrick Smallwood
In case you were wondering- event viewer/Application log event ID 1217 - Unlimited 1216 16 gb Pat Bill Higgins

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread msharik
Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? tell them what? my experience? ok. -MichèleImmigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk

Re: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Scott Schnoll
Title: Message Um, that's what I said (except for the part about rebooting servers weekly). Did you not read me post in its entirety? Let me hit the highlights g: Exchange's online defragmentation is great for defragmenting and reclaiming white space; however, this process does not

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
I've overwritten backups tapes by that point. Different companies have different requirements of course. Our users/clients understand that EVERY email they've EVER composed or received is NOT available to them. The occassional restoration of a single email is simply not worth the headache,

RE: NT 4 120 day eval situation

2001-10-31 Thread Schatz, Daniel
Yes, it´s the NT version. Some opinions about the Microsoft way to fix this ? - Q173507 Thank you. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 5:26 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: NT 4 120 day eval situation

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread RZorz
Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? I worked with a law firm that did what normal businesses do, they throw out their garbage, and the garbage company picks it up. Well, one idiot threw out some important papers, and the garbage company took it away. Actually in this case

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Message For those that do not know, Scott Scholl is a Windows2000/NTServer MVP and co-author of Exchange2000 Server:the Complete Reference. William -Original Message-From: Scott Schnoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:57 AMTo: MS-Exchange

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Mood, Steve
Title: Message 16GB for standard 16TB for Enterprise. -Original Message-From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil What is the Exchange 5.5 IS limit? 12 GBor 14?

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread msharik
*snicker* I have had users who stored important mail in their Deleted Items Folder. Then, when they noticed GASP! it was gone, they called and said, What did you do to it? I said, Do you store important paperwork in the garbage can? No? Then don't do it with email. Their manager sided with

Re: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Scott Schnoll
Title: Message Yup! Its only when you need to reclaim the white space that ESEUTIL becomes involved. In Steve's case, when you move the users to this database, the data will first occupy the available white space. Only once this space has been consumed will the database file begin to grow

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
Title: Message Seemed obvious and reasonable, but then again, when has this business ever been obvious and reasonable g mit freundlichen Grüßen,(Best Regards), Steve Ropiak ZF Group NAO CERT, Exchange and Bar Code Administrator -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Lost input channel

2001-10-31 Thread Glen Macdonald
Hi all, We are experiencing a very strange phenomenon with one particular user. Whenever he sends an email, it causes the SMTP connector from our Ex2k box to sendmail server to die. Lost input channel from [10.1.0.6](this is the Ex2k box) to MTA after mail. We then need to force connection on the

Possible to disable deletion? [WAS: Message Level Recovery]

2001-10-31 Thread Franklin, Joel
Is it possible to disable users' ability to delete items? Joel Franklin Network Analyst -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:

RE: e-mail recovery

2001-10-31 Thread RZorz
Title: RE: e-mail recovery If you don't have exchange, only your ISP has a chance of getting it. If you have exchange and your deleted items retentions is set to X number of days, you have that long to get it. -Original Message- From: Gasparino, Michael (x2665) [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
As Michèle indicated, it's not exactly BLB, but it bridges the gap. Yes, it's expensive. William -Original Message- From: Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:41 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues

Exchange 5.5 OWA question

2001-10-31 Thread Bob Chyka
Hello everyone, i have a nt 4.0 server domain. our exchange server is a bdc (i know, i know) with MS proxy server 2.0 running on it also. exchange has been running flawless for 3 years on this box. my boss wants to be able to use OWA (fianally). i am having trouble getting it working. the

RE: OT - Pix Firewalls

2001-10-31 Thread Ellery July
Pix are not for do it yourself people unless you have lots of time. Why did you/they decide on Cisco PIX? -Original Message- From: Karen Palmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:24 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: OT - Pix Firewalls

RE: OT - Pix Firewalls

2001-10-31 Thread Karen Palmer
Will do. I'm a tech book junkie. kp -Original Message-From: Ellery July [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:39 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: OT - Pix Firewalls Get the Cisco Press DCN book and router sim program. The router simulation

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Sean Martin
We've been moving along with a 14 day DIR for about 4 years now. 90 days sounds kind of excessive. Regards, Sean Martin, MCSE Network Administrator Ribelin Lowell Company Insurance Brokers, Inc. 3111 C Street, Suite 300 Anchorage, Alaska 99503 Ph: (907) 561-1250 Fax: (907) 561-4315 Cell:

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread RZorz
Title: Message Should we stand? Or is that only reserved for HIM? Seriouslythough, it'sgreat to have another MVP around. -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:33 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread RZorz
Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? I hate getting these e-mails so out of order. Yeah, that works fine for the associates, junior partners, etc. Once one of the rainmakers has a problem, the policy will change. -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William

RE: e-mail recovery

2001-10-31 Thread Clark, Steve
You can go into the archive dir for in/ out and find the email manually. Copy the files to your drive and rename with a TXT extension. If your org sends/ receives a lot of mail, you're in for a loggg fight. Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Stephen J. Norton
Title: Message I believe Standard is 16 GB and Enterprise is unlimited. -Original Message-From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:50 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil What is the Exchange 5.5 IS limit? 12

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Message I read all your posts Scott. You've also said what I've summarised here dozens of times over the last two years. Did you read those? ;o) Thanks. William -Original Message-From: Scott Schnoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:51 AMTo:

RE: e-mail recovery

2001-10-31 Thread Drewski
Go to the deleted items folder, find the recover deleted items selection on one of the dropdown menus. Of course, we have no idea what version of Exchange, Outlook, Windows or hair gel you use, so... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!

RE: Mailing Lists

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: RE: Mailing Lists Maybe we should ask Randy how many customers would this list(s) entail? -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:21 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Mailing Lists Where are your

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Clark, Steve
And web surfing... Steve Clark Clark Systems Support, LLC AVIEN Charter Member Who's watching your network? www.clarksupport.com 301-610-9584 voice 240-465-0323 Efax The data furnished in connection with this document is deemed by Clark Systems Support, LLC., to contain

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread STEVE BROOK
Test restore is a part of the weekly procedure, as far as the files and edb's are concerned. I would test restore exchange too if I could get hold of a spare machine on this site. See the reply to RZorz. Last test restore of Exchange here was a real restore. BLB is very new procedure here and

RE: e-mail recovery

2001-10-31 Thread Drewski
the utility is Outlook. If deleted item retention time limits have passed, the utility is NTBackup or another exchange aware Backup application. -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! No mention shall be made of coral or of crystal; the

RE: Exchange 5.5 OWA question

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
Does http://ipaddress/exchangework? Troubleshooting Guide for OWA: http://support.microsoft.com/support/exchange/content/whitepapers/owa_tshoot.asp William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message-From: Bob Chyka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:51

RE: Mailing Lists

2001-10-31 Thread RZorz
Title: RE: Mailing Lists Yup. All our contact info is in a SQL database, and we've been seeking a decent solution that we can afford to keep e-mail address lists as dynamic as we can keep our Fax phonebooks. We're experimenting with Gammadyne because it has an ODBC connection. From just

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Message 16GB for standard. 16TB (theoretical) for Enterprise. William -Original Message-From: Howie Pince [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:50 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil What is the Exchange 5.5 IS limit? 12 GBor 14?

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread RZorz
Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? Yup. Until some other idiot loses something and it has to go to 60. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:58 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: How many

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Markus Lindemann
Because it's easier than that :) However I agree that one needs to set a limit. At the same time, depending on your size it's not that much to do a monthly backup and put it into the safe for years to come. Obviously if your store is that huge then this may not be that feasible. All down to user

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Ropiak Steve - NAO Florence Office Exchange and Bar Code Admn.
Title: Message So, let me pose a hypothetical. I have a 6 GB priv. I move all the users off that server, the priv stays at 6 GB but is basically just white space. If I then move a bunch of users back onto the server will the whitespace get recycled first or will the priv grow from the newly

RE: Mailing Lists

2001-10-31 Thread Franklin, Joel
Randy Lauritzen wrote: Does anyone have suggestions for dealing with mailing lists? www.lsoft.com We have a box running LISTSERV Lite on top of LSMTP Lite. You can deploy it $1500 + time + hardware. It is not a 100% point-and-click solution, and you won't be able to deploy it without a good

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Jim Holmgren
Ok...this thread got me to thinking, I thought I'd run a test on my DR server (its been a while). I restored the IS from tape, ran Isinteg -patch, ran the DSIS consistency checker. When I go to Exchange Admin program - I have no mailboxes listed. Win2K SP2, Exchange 5.5 Server, SP4 on both,

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread STEVE BROOK
Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? Agreed, but there are some sites where IT is still the poor relation.  For instance where Business critical software has been running for many years on AS400 or similar and the NT network is fairly new and is only for

RE: Auto creation of user profile

2001-10-31 Thread David James
Everyone, I've used the tool Kevin mentioned, and it works better and is far less complicated than ProfGen. I would recommend it to everyone who gets tired of creating an Outlook Profile manually for every WS that is rolled out. Take a look at his stuff here: www.mailsoftware.co.uk DJ

RE: e-mail recovery

2001-10-31 Thread RZorz
Title: RE: e-mail recovery First, check to see if they're there. See KB articles for DumpsterAlwaysOn. If they're gone, then backups are your only option. -Original Message- From: Gasparino, Michael (x2665) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:09 AM To:

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Kevin Miller
That is very true.. Wife syndrome there. you always in real life means: well you did it once in a dream, and I think 2 times since I have met you. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message- From: Scott Schnoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:05

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Kevin Miller
Title: Message Lets test that that theory. Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:16 AMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil 16GB for standard.

OT Halloween tricks

2001-10-31 Thread Cicerrella, Steve
Okay, this group just loves off topic hoohahs so here is a good one. In the US we celebrate Halloween with a fervor, at least those of us that are cool do. My company is having a Halloween party today, pizza, the whole nine yards. So, being the good techie I brought in a fog machine. One

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
Thank you. I knew it allowed for 5 digits. -Original Message- From: STEVE BROOK [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:25 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? Thanks, turns out it is the same as 5.5, 24855

RE: e-mail recovery

2001-10-31 Thread Martin Blackstone
You can use standard Exch recovery options as outlined in the MS Exch DR whitepaper, then pull the data using Exmerge or OL. -Original Message- From: Gasparino, Michael (x2665) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 10:09 AM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject:

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Howie Pince
Title: Message Same under SBS 4.5? Thought I'd seen somewhere that it was 12? h.? Thanks Howie -Original Message-From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:16 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil 16GB

RE: OT - Pix Firewalls

2001-10-31 Thread Karen Palmer
Another suggestion is to get your "Network Manager" to spring for a training class for one of your fellow co-workers. Then that person can come back and teach the rest of the staff. Well, that was my suggestion, but he is a do it himself kind of guy and not much on showing what was done.

Re: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Scott Schnoll
MessageIMHO, this statement is wrong: The best maintance [sic] for Exchange is apply service packs. other then that nothing needs to be done. There is a lot more to maintaining Exchange than applying service packs. You should also regularly review your event logs (daily, if not more

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Drewski
Title: Message if you didn't run the eseutil, tho, the new data would just re-write over the empty space that gets defragmented by the online process built into exchange. -- DrewVisit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!"In the frank expression of

RE: OT - Pix Firewalls

2001-10-31 Thread Karen Palmer
These items are on our state purchasing contract, which does provide a price break. We will get a brief training session, but I am not sure that "brief" will be comprehensive enough for newbies who have never touched routers or Cisco Pix firewalls. However, it will have to serve, since

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? I would guess, if Michèle were to deploy Exchange in a law firm, email archiving policy would be so clearly documented and implemented that nobody would dare ask about a wayward email from the days of yore. A total guess though.

Re: OT Halloween tricks

2001-10-31 Thread Patrick Smallwood
Steve, Does this mean we are or are not invited? Pizza sounds great!! Or has Halloween been canceled? Good thing it was a help desk guy who turned it on!! Are you sure you will be able to live this down, or is that what you will be asking Santa for? (assuming cool people ALSO believe in Santa)

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread msharik
Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? of course -- isn't that what we all do? -MichèleImmigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk

RE: OT Halloween tricks

2001-10-31 Thread Erik Sojka
Title: Message Crazy nut! Pizza? Whooboy, you got a designated driver? -Original Message-From: Cicerrella, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:59 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: OT Halloween tricks Okay, this group just loves

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread msharik
Title: Message it was a different color -MichèleImmigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - They call it PMS because Mad Cow

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? Well, I'm not sure what sexual orientation has to do with object-level messaging restores, but ok -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:39 AMTo:

RE: OT - Pix Firewalls

2001-10-31 Thread Karen Palmer
I was not part of the decision-making process. We are standardizing on Cisco equipment, so that probably played a part in the decision. As to why we are moving from a managed BSD/Gauntlet firewall, I believe that our network manager wants to save money. -Original Message-From:

RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Drewski
Title: RE: How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? apparently not. -- DrewVisit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!"Men of peace usually are brave." Gene Roddenberry -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Eseutil

2001-10-31 Thread Lefkovics, William
Title: Message I tried and ran out of disk space. That was in 1998. -Original Message-From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:45 PMTo: MS-Exchange Admin IssuesSubject: RE: Eseutil Lets test that that theory. Kevinm M WLKMMAS,

RE: IIS ?

2001-10-31 Thread Siegfried Weber
Even if you only stop the World Wide Web Service you will loose the ability to administer public folders with the Exchange System Management Console and the Instant Messaging stuff will no longer work. If you deinstall IIS you will screw up your whole Exchange 2000 installation because this will

RE: Comments : How many of you use Message Level Recovery ?

2001-10-31 Thread Kumar, Ashish
What do you think ? -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:39 PM To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues Subject: RE: Comments : How many of you use Message Level Recovery ? Do you think that every exchange administrator in the world is on

Re: IIS ?

2001-10-31 Thread Matt Moore
That was kind of what I was thinking. thanks for the conformation. Matt - Original Message - From: Siegfried Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:44 PM Subject: RE: IIS ? Even if you only stop the World Wide Web

RE: OT Halloween tricks

2001-10-31 Thread Cicerrella, Steve
funny you should mention... OH man, could you imagine the damage done, 6 floors of pc's knocked out by the sprinkler system would equal unemployed. Nah, they are set off by heat, thank goodness. I am the only one catching the heat. And I didn't even turn it on.. the help desk guys

RE: Exch5.5 and Linux firewall

2001-10-31 Thread Marty Richards
OpenBSD is good, no disputing that. Linux is also good - but both depend on their administrator to be secure. A well adminned Linux box beats an adminless BSD machine. The same argument could be extended (and often is) that a well-adminned Windoes box can be an effective firewall. This is

<    1   2   3   >