The are already sorted. I just need the largest one which is the first one.
Mark Weaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 11 January 2003 08:56 pm, Jim C wrote:
I have a list of positive integers of which I only want the first one.
They are of arbitrary size.
On Saturday 11 January 2003 08:56 pm, Jim C wrote:
I have a list of positive integers of which I only want the first one.
They are of arbitrary size. How can I cut the rest of them off?
I've been trying to write a regular expression for this using sed or awk.
you don't specify the format of
Hello all,
I have been troubleshooting my print system and have hit a brick wall.
I am using Mandrake 9.0 , Cups for the spooler, HP Deskjet 712
(foomatic+pnm2ppa) , ghostscript.
I can print any graphic file from kdeprint, but text files never print.
The cups error log shows ghostscript can
Sorry to bother you again, but is there nobody out there running
Mandrake able to give me some pointers or answers so that new and old
kernels can boot in the mdk9.1beta environment??
Eg. looking at the thread entitled: First 9.1beta *not* frustrating
experience there seems to be problems with
Hi!
9.1 is the upcoming release and good you are testing it, but reporting here on
expert is not the right place it should be done :
in case all is good:
on cooker
in case there are drawbacks/bugs:
on bugzilla (and allways do a search if the problem was reported before)
Its just a bit OT here
I have a list of positive integers of which I only want the first one.
They are of arbitrary size. How can I cut the rest of them off?
I've been trying to write a regular expression for this using sed or
awk.
you don't specify the format of the integers. are they space separated
and
On Sunday 12 January 2003 01:27 am, Will Styles wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 01:58 am, Toshiro wrote:
Anybody knows why dosemu is not included with
Mandrake?
Mandrake was incompetent with their dosemu packages
(iirc in MDK 8.0 and 8.1, it DID NOT EVEN WORK in X
mode - did MDK actually test
Vincent Danen wrote:
If I'm not wrong there's no bugzilla for released distributions.
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com is only for cooker.
Sorry, you're right. I meant MandrakeExpert, which is where all
released problems should be sent to.
Well, maybe mandrakeexpert interface is better for
On Sunday January 12 2003 08:48 am, Azrael wrote:
I don't have the space to run 9.1b1 as well as 9.
I don't need an incredibly stable os for daily use.. heck.. so is
it possible to upgrade 9.0 to 9.1b1
Or do I need a clean install.
If I do a clean install, any problems keeping my current
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 15:55, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Sunday January 12 2003 08:48 am, Azrael wrote:
I don't have the space to run 9.1b1 as well as 9.
I don't need an incredibly stable os for daily use.. heck.. so is
it possible to upgrade 9.0 to 9.1b1
Or do I need a clean install.
If I
Tom Brinkman wrote:
...
9.1 has much newer glibc and gcc, with everything rebuilt for
them. Since your 9.0 install probly has much more software than the
...
Didn't realize that -- thanks for the heads up. I'll be waiting til it's
released.
Jack
Want to buy your Pack or Services from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 10:55 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Sunday January 12 2003 08:48 am, Azrael wrote:
[...]
I've been using 9.1 since cooker unfroze shortly after 9.0's
release. It's been solid all along ... on ReiserFS. From what I
Steffen Barszus wrote:
Hi!
9.1 is the upcoming release and good you are testing it, but reporting here on
expert is not the right place it should be done :
in case all is good:
on cooker
in case there are drawbacks/bugs:
on bugzilla (and allways do a search if the problem was reported
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 11:57:38AM -0500, Jesus Arocho wrote:
I am using Mandrake 9.0 and a Iomega 250, usb zip. The capacity seems to be
limited to around 10MB (I get drive full errors when I try to transfer a 12
MB tar file to an empty diskette) and the drive does not appear when I use
Greetings everyone,
I have power mac G4 cube and I'm unable install linux 8.2 PPC onto it.
I insert the installation CD and hold the c key as the system is booting up (as per
the directions on the MDL site), and nothing happens, my macOS keeps booting up. Any
help will be greatly
Hello!
A friend of mine is trying to install 9.0 on a RAID 0 array of two hard
disks connected to DawiControl DC100 (HPT-370 chipset) controller.
Since he's having problems and since he's a newbie and since I can't
just walk over ;), I'd like to know if it's possible to install 9.0 on
drives
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 08:02:02PM +0800, Gerald Timothy Quimpo wrote:
on a Dell Latitude CPi (300 Mhz PII) using Mandrake 9.0 I have problems with
smooth scrolling after a hwclock --hctosys. when I do that, i can't click
and drag windows anymore (have to right click, move), and i can't
On Sunday 12 January 2003 14:48, Azrael wrote:
I don't have the space to run 9.1b1 as well as 9.
I don't need an incredibly stable os for daily use.. heck.. so is it
possible to upgrade 9.0 to 9.1b1
Or do I need a clean install.
If I do a clean install, any problems keeping my current /home
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 05:56:16PM -0800, Jim C wrote:
I have a list of positive integers of which I only want the first one.
They are of arbitrary size. How can I cut the rest of them off?
I've been trying to write a regular expression for this using sed or awk.
#!/bin/sh
LIST=42 666 1776
Just to make sure: If I do a totally clean install of 9.1b1 without any
other OS on the system, is lilo going to have any problems?
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 17:05, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 14:48, Azrael wrote:
I don't have the space to run 9.1b1 as well as 9.
I don't
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 17:56:16 -0800
Jim C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a list of positive integers of which I only want the first one.
They are of arbitrary size. How can I cut the rest of them off?
I've been trying to write a regular expression for this using sed or awk.
bash you
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 09:15:50 -0800
Mark Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 05:56:16PM -0800, Jim C wrote:
I have a list of positive integers of which I only want the first one.
They are of arbitrary size. How can I cut the rest of them off?
I've been trying to write
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 11:28, Jack Coates wrote:
Steffen Barszus wrote:
Hi!
9.1 is the upcoming release and good you are testing it, but reporting here on
expert is not the right place it should be done :
in case all is good:
on cooker
in case there are drawbacks/bugs:
on bugzilla
On Sunday 12 January 2003 17:22, Azrael wrote:
Just to make sure: If I do a totally clean install of 9.1b1 without any
other OS on the system, is lilo going to have any problems?
I doubt it, you should be OK. If you don't have any other entries in lilo
other than linux and the standard ones
On Sunday January 12 2003 10:09 am, Azrael wrote:
I don't need all that many apps. As long as b1 supports
gaim/gnomeicu/evolution/xchat/xine and of course a terminal, then
I'll consider it.
Hmm.. does it come with xine? I seem to have trouble with xine.
Everything you've listed except
On Sunday January 12 2003 10:15 am, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 10:55 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:
I've been using 9.1 since cooker unfroze shortly after 9.0's
release. It's been solid all along ... on ReiserFS. From what I
understand 9.1b1 (due to the 2.4.21
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 06:48, Azrael wrote:
I don't have the space to run 9.1b1 as well as 9.
I don't need an incredibly stable os for daily use.. heck.. so is it
possible to upgrade 9.0 to 9.1b1
Or do I need a clean install.
If I do a clean install, any problems keeping my current /home
Praedor... don't know if this is right. But gleaning what I can from
the cooker list, it seems that xfs is causing some trouble in the new
kernel and so is pretty unstable. The idea seems to be get the rest
working and then introduce that one. The old case of when 2 targets are
moving hold
Just a curiosity... but since lilo is just about one of the oldest
programs in linux. what happened?
James
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 11:14, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 17:22, Azrael wrote:
Just to make sure: If I do a totally clean install of 9.1b1 without any
other OS
On Sunday 12 January 2003 18:40, James Sparenberg wrote:
Just a curiosity... but since lilo is just about one of the oldest
programs in linux. what happened?
What happened was that lilo installation couldn't be stopped/skipped ...well
no big deal so I installed it in the mbr as I usually
On Sunday 12 January 2003 18:56, Mark Weaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 12:05 pm, H.J.Bathoorn scribbled incoherently:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 14:48, Azrael wrote:
I don't have the space to run 9.1b1 as well as 9.
I don't need an
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 13:48, Mark Weaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 01:34 pm, Tom Brinkman scribbled incoherently:
On Sunday January 12 2003 10:15 am, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 10:55 am, Tom Brinkman
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:56:09 -0500
Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey Harm! at least you got buttons to click on at that point! :) No
buttons showed up on that panel during the intall, which necessitated
me starting the install all over and choosing all in order to get it
going.
I
On Sunday 12 January 2003 01:42 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 06:13 am, Steffen Barszus scribbled incoherently:
Hi!
9.1 is the upcoming release and good you are testing it, but reporting
here on expert is not the right
On 11 Jan 2003 14:03:20 -0500
Ric Tibbetts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not meaning to sound like a smart a** here. But the best, most
reliableunerase system I've found, that is fully transportable
across all platforms, is a good backup system. There's just no making
up for it.
Speaking as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Es Divendres 10 Gener 2003 18:03, en J. Grant va escriure:
KDE has some configure options for this. However, i have the same
problem as you. kde scale 0-10 i think it was anything more than 1 was
too quick. and it goes up in steps of 1 ! i've
i running proftpd on a prosuite 8.2 behind my firewall
i had assumed that it was necessary to put aline in my /etc/hosts.allow to
allow connections from the local network because connections are forwarded
from the firewall but having discivered that a similar line for sshd isn't
allowing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 11 January 2003 10:56 pm, James Sparenberg scribbled incoherently:
It should be in cooker ... grab this one and you should be able to
rebuild/build rpms...
rpm-rebuilder-0.7-1mdk is the file from 9.0 and yes... if forgot the er
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 03:42, Mark Weaver wrote:
If you can already do it with Python, then why not go through the rest
of the process and finish the application. Then there will be an app
out there that will do what you are needing. course, then the rest of us
will be able to make use of
On Sunday 12 January 2003 02:58 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 02:57 pm, et scribbled incoherently:
Mark is absolutly correct,,, I am the only one around here alllowed to be
an @$$, and my wife and daughter told me so
On Sunday 12 January 2003 19:49, Charles A Edwards wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 13:56:09 -0500
Mark Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey Harm! at least you got buttons to click on at that point! :) No
buttons showed up on that panel during the intall, which necessitated
me starting the
Hi all,
any of you with a running 9.1 beta willing to send some screenshots?
I would like to see what it looks like before I attempt a test on a
spare drive.
Thanks in advance.
--
Mike McNeese
Springdale,
Arkansas USA
°
Currently
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 06:13 am, Steffen Barszus scribbled incoherently:
Hi!
9.1 is the upcoming release and good you are testing it, but reporting here
on expert is not the right place it should be done :
in case all is good:
on cooker
in
On Sunday 12 January 2003 09:48, mycal62 wrote:
Hi all,
any of you with a running 9.1 beta willing to send some screenshots?
I would like to see what it looks like before I attempt a test on a
spare drive.
Thanks in advance.
I don't mind sending some screenshots but what kind of
You can send me 'big massive ultra fat yummy-licious oh my god that
image won't even fit onto a DVD.. and I haven't even got a dvd-burner'
sized pics ;)
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 22:16, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 09:48, mycal62 wrote:
Hi all,
any of you with a running 9.1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 22:23, Azrael wrote:
You can send me 'big massive ultra fat yummy-licious oh my god that
image won't even fit onto a DVD.. and I haven't even got a dvd-burner'
sized pics ;)
OK, gimme some time to take a few:o)
Good Luck,
HarM
Want to buy your Pack or Services from
On Sunday 12 January 2003 22:30, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 22:23, Azrael wrote:
You can send me 'big massive ultra fat yummy-licious oh my god that
image won't even fit onto a DVD.. and I haven't even got a dvd-burner'
sized pics ;)
OK, gimme some time to take a
Title: RE: [expert] 9.1 beta screenshots please?
Check out these...
http://tuxreports.com/modules.php?full=1_albumName=album25=mdk1=modload=gallery=index=view_photo.php
-Original Message-
From: mycal62 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, 12 January, 2003 10:48 PM
To: [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 11 January 2003 12:46 pm, Ric Tibbetts scribbled incoherently:
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 11:28, Jack Coates wrote:
Steffen Barszus wrote:
Hi!
9.1 is the upcoming release and good you are testing it, but reporting
here on expert is
On Sun Jan 12, 2003 at 04:25:42PM +0100, Luca Olivetti wrote:
If I'm not wrong there's no bugzilla for released distributions.
https://qa.mandrakesoft.com is only for cooker.
Sorry, you're right. I meant MandrakeExpert, which is where all
released problems should be sent to.
Well, maybe
On Sun Jan 12, 2003 at 12:31:41AM -0500, Bob Puff@NLE wrote:
Ahhh... now I feel like an ass. Sorry Bob... my previous message in
this thread was a little heavy (been a long weekend). My apologies for
some harsh words. Your message wasn't threaded with the rest in the
thread, so I didn't see
On Sun Jan 12, 2003 at 03:48:01AM -0600, mycal62 wrote:
Hi all,
any of you with a running 9.1 beta willing to send some screenshots?
I would like to see what it looks like before I attempt a test on a
spare drive.
If anyone wants to post screenshots on Freezer Burn, there is a section
On Friday 10 January 2003 08:30 am, Mark Weaver wrote:
Ken Thompson wrote:
On Thursday 09 January 2003 08:14 pm, Mark Weaver wrote:
Pierre Fortin wrote:
Stop or remove shorewall -- sure wish Mdk would have made it more
obvious during install/upgrade that it was going to add a firewall
All;
Ok, I'm ready to dump the whole thing in the bay. I have a server gone
mad.
After a power failure, the server came back in a very unstable state. So
far, any efforts to fix it, seem to only make it worse. Every time I
think I have it fixed, something else seems to go wrong.
As it stands,
On Saturday 11 January 2003 07:46 am, stefmit wrote:
Does anybody know what is - then - the difference between smoothwall and
ipcop (i.e. who is doing more development and update work)? I got ipcop
(www.ipcop.org), and I like it ... never tried smoothwall, though.
One of the developers of
Try this:
Plug in the eUSB SmartMedia / CompactFlash Adapter and leave it plugged in.
Change the following files:
/etc/modules
Addmicrotek to the end of the list
/etc/modules.conf
Alter the following line:
probeall usb-interface usb-uhci
To read:
probeall
After all my reported problems with 4191 NV drivers, and Mdk 9.0, under
both KDE and Gnome, I can now happily report a significant 2D speed
improvement, and don't need to run glxinfo continuously. KDE3.1 is
super-quick using the nvidia drivers..
--
Chuck Burns - Grand Bay, AL
Man = Mars
On a whim I bought a cheap 6-in-1 USB flash card reader (the maker's
web site is www.pqiusa.com). I managed to get it to work on my
Mandrake 9.0 laptop, but it was a bit tricky.
The first problem is that that 2.4.19 kernel in 9.0 doesn't seem to
recognize that this device is actually four
I have just installed 9.1 beta 1 and I must agree with wow that it looks
better.
I use gnome as my primary desktop, and it just looks a touched more
polished. The font config menu gives options for font smoothing.
The pointer appears transparent almost (light grey) and has a shadow ..
very
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 09:08:41PM -0500, Mark Weaver wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 08:42 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled incoherently:
All;
Ok, I'm ready to dump the whole thing in the bay. I have a server gone
mad.
After a power failure, the server came back in a very unstable
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 02:38, Mark Weaver wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 09:23 pm, Azrael scribbled incoherently:
I have just installed 9.1 beta 1 and I must agree with wow that it looks
better.
I use gnome as my primary desktop, and it just looks a touched more
polished. The font
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 02:46, Mark Weaver wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 09:42 pm, Azrael scribbled incoherently:
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 02:38, Mark Weaver wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 09:23 pm, Azrael scribbled incoherently:
I have just installed 9.1 beta 1 and I must agree with wow
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 09:36:39PM -0500, Mark Weaver wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 09:25 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled incoherently:
Hi Ric,
The very first thing I'd do is turn PS completely off. Better yet...just
take the little bugger outa there cause in the long run that app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 01:34 pm, Tom Brinkman scribbled incoherently:
On Sunday January 12 2003 10:15 am, Praedor Tempus Atrebates wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 10:55 am, Tom Brinkman wrote:
I've been using 9.1 since cooker unfroze
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 21:36, Mark Weaver wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 09:25 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled incoherently:
Hi Ric,
The very first thing I'd do is turn PS completely off. Better yet...just
take the little bugger outa there cause in the long run that app is more
On Sunday 12 January 2003 03:11 pm, James Sparenberg wrote:
It definitely sounds like something is eating up your cpu though.
no, that's not what it is. top -d 1 right after waking up from an apm -s
does not show anything interesting. i get back to around 93% idle after
a few seconds.
in any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 12:05 pm, H.J.Bathoorn scribbled incoherently:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 14:48, Azrael wrote:
I don't have the space to run 9.1b1 as well as 9.
I don't need an incredibly stable os for daily use.. heck.. so is it
Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2003 19:26 schrieb Todd Lyons:
Charles A Edwards wrote on Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 01:22:15PM -0500 :
Mark, your messages are not recognized by mutt as being signed
messages. I can tell this because I can see your pgp sig as quoted
above instead of being verified.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 08:58, H.J.Bathoorn wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 18:40, James Sparenberg wrote:
Just a curiosity... but since lilo is just about one of the oldest
programs in linux. what happened?
What happened was that lilo installation couldn't be stopped/skipped
...well no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 01:40 pm, James Sparenberg scribbled incoherently:
Just a curiosity... but since lilo is just about one of the oldest
programs in linux. what happened?
James
Not sure James, but I've noticed the same problem existing
Hi there,
a little while ago, I was looking for a way to undelete a file on an
ext3 filesystem, but didn't find any...
Seems like you know more about this issue, so would you mind sharing
some knowledge about this? :-)
Thanks,
Hans
On Sun, 2003-01-12 at 19:48, Mark Weaver wrote:
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 02:58 pm, H.J.Bathoorn scribbled incoherently:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 18:40, James Sparenberg wrote:
Just a curiosity... but since lilo is just about one of the oldest
programs in linux. what happened?
What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 03:01 pm, H.J.Bathoorn scribbled incoherently:
hey Harm! at least you got buttons to click on at that point! :) No
buttons showed up on that panel during the intall, which necessitated me
starting the install all over
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 02:02 pm, SainTiss scribbled incoherently:
Hi there,
a little while ago, I was looking for a way to undelete a file on an
ext3 filesystem, but didn't find any...
Seems like you know more about this issue, so would you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 11 January 2003 02:03 pm, Ric Tibbetts scribbled incoherently:
which reminds me...Tom, has there been an unerase recovery tool released
for ReiserFS yet. Thats the only thing stopping me at the moment from
going back to ReiserFS. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 02:54 pm, Charles A Edwards scribbled incoherently:
On 11 Jan 2003 14:03:20 -0500
Ric Tibbetts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not meaning to sound like a smart a** here. But the best, most
reliableunerase system I've found,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 02:57 pm, et scribbled incoherently:
Mark is absolutly correct,,, I am the only one around here alllowed to be
an @$$, and my wife and daughter told me so
And Steffen is also abo-solut-ly correct to... 9.1 is still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 12 January 2003 03:43 pm, et scribbled incoherently:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 02:57 pm, et scribbled incoherently:
Mark is absolutly correct,,, I am the only one around here alllowed to
be an @$$, and my wife and daughter told me
Hi list,
I was wondering if any of you that have been test driving 9.1beta1 have been
able to get a display res larger then 1024x768 at all. I can't get anything
bigger then this for love or money.
--
Mark
---
Paid for by Penguins against
On Sunday 12 January 2003 08:42 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled incoherently:
All;
Ok, I'm ready to dump the whole thing in the bay. I have a server gone
mad.
After a power failure, the server came back in a very unstable state. So
far, any efforts to fix it, seem to only make it worse.
On Sunday 12 January 2003 09:25 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled incoherently:
Hi Ric,
The very first thing I'd do is turn PS completely off. Better yet...just
take the little bugger outa there cause in the long run that app is more
trouble at times then it's worth. Once that thing isn't
On Sunday 12 January 2003 09:23 pm, Azrael scribbled incoherently:
I have just installed 9.1 beta 1 and I must agree with wow that it looks
better.
I use gnome as my primary desktop, and it just looks a touched more
polished. The font config menu gives options for font smoothing.
The pointer
On Sunday 12 January 2003 09:42 pm, Azrael scribbled incoherently:
On Mon, 2003-01-13 at 02:38, Mark Weaver wrote:
On Sunday 12 January 2003 09:23 pm, Azrael scribbled incoherently:
I have just installed 9.1 beta 1 and I must agree with wow that it
looks better.
I use gnome as my
On Sunday 12 January 2003 09:49 pm, Azrael scribbled incoherently:
What resolution are you using on your desktop with 9.1?
1024x768 24bpp
are you able to get anything higher?
Doesn't seem so :/
ok...thanks. it must be something funcky with this release.
--
Mark
On Sunday 12 January 2003 10:12 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled incoherently:
Ok...just to make sure, do a restart on both the Postfix service and the
xinetd service to ensure they're running. This is usually the #1 cause of
that particular error message when trying to connect to the imap
85 matches
Mail list logo
