Fixed.
-ben
On Jan 16, 2008 4:03 PM, Matthew Cottrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the strangest problem compiling arb on Leopard 10.5.1 (iMac
PowerPC G5) with a fresh installation of Fink.
Package manager version: 0.27.10
Distribution version: 0.8.1.rsync powerpc
arb seems to compile
On Dec 9, 2007 9:51 PM, Martin Costabel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PM wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:18:36AM -0800, PM wrote:
Is gnewspost being maintained? I contacted the package manager a few
days ago, but I keep getting this error:
I think he is still around, but not very often
Fixed
-ben
On Feb 24, 2005, at 4:48 PM, Jason J. Park wrote:
id3lib4-dev now is in stable, but now I get the following error when
performing a fink selfupdate and fink update-all.
...
flac-1.1.1/obj/release/bin/Makefile.am
flac-1.1.1/obj/release/bin/Makefile.in
flac-1.1.1/obj/release/lib/
What exact fink version do you have?
What is the output of:
% fink --version
Package manager version: 0.23.5.cvs
Distribution version: 0.7.1.cvs
x-tad-bigger
/x-tad-bigger
One of the 'binary install' update methods for OS X 10.2 (even though you are on 10.3) listed on:
You don't need to email the list at all, only the maintainer is
necessary.
-Ben
On Nov 7, 2004, at 1:25 AM, Emily Jackson wrote:
The patch accompanying the new flac-nox package fails:
sed -e 's,@PREFIX@,/sw,g' /sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/finkinfo/sound/
flac-nox.patch | patch -p1
missing header
On Sep 10, 2004, at 12:47 PM, Ralf Höling wrote:
Hi all!
Am 08.09.2004 um 22:23 schrieb Mattia Vaccari:
well, yes, I've run into _exactly_ (hence no error message pasting)
the same problem with xmms after updating esound! I recompiled
everything from sources but this didn't seem to help.
Is
I'm in england, so i'll have to try to update it over ssh/vnc.
-Ben
On Jul 9, 2004, at 11:25 AM, Timothy Gregg wrote:
On Jul 8, 2004, at 2:46 PM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
It's completely appropriate to ask to increment a package to a newer
upstream version.
Sometimes the patches work between
On Jun 2, 2004, at 7:55 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
That's because nautilus-shlibs is only available in the unstable tree
(which is why a binary isn't available). By rights,
gnome-python2-py23 and therefore gramps should not be available in
stable either, because of this.
Anyway, you'll
On Apr 23, 2004, at 11:07 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
On Apr 23, 2004, at 1:58 PM, Guy Lauquin wrote:
[chamaerops:/sw/fink] guy% sudo ln -s
/sw/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/db3_3.3.11
-24_darwin-powerpc.deb /sw/fink/debs/db3_3.3.11-24_darwin-powerpc.deb
Password:
ln:
On Apr 27, 2004, at 11:41 AM, Remi Mommsen wrote:
I tried to upgrade gramps to the current version 1.0.3-11. However, it
fails due to an include file it doesn't find. I paste a part of
configure, too, as there are some 'command not found'. I don't know if
they are relevant:
checking for
The cvs sources should build 0.5.3 unless i forgot to check something
in which is possible. Yes i never tagged 0.5.2, oh well.
IMO, providing CVS is enough. For open source principles, fine, but I
don't see why one would want to use the finkcommander source tgz to
install it. Anyway, I didn't
Why?
-Ben
On Apr 18, 2004, at 11:34 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Ben Hines wrote:
Version 0.5.3 of FinkCommander has been released. This version is a
bug-fix release, which fixes the bug added in 0.5.2 where all
packages showed as stable.
Hi Ben,
would it be too much to ask to put a source
x-tad-biggerVersion 0.5.3 of FinkCommander has been released. This version is a bug-fix release, which fixes the bug added in 0.5.2 where all packages showed as stable.
/x-tad-biggerx-tad-biggerhttp://finkcommander.sourceforge.net/history//x-tad-biggerx-tad-bigger
FinkCommander is a graphical
On Mar 26, 2004, at 2:51 PM, Remi Mommsen wrote:
Hi,
On Mar 26, 2004, at 2:33 PM, Phil Ershler wrote:
I e-mailed the maintainer for clamav, asking about the possibilities
of updating clamav to the latest release. I did not receive a reply.
Is there a possibility of updating to the new
I believe we have fixed that problem a while back. Should work with
fink 0.18.0.
-Ben
On Jan 11, 2004, at 2:02 PM, John Hurst wrote:
G'day Mike,
One caveat: just make sure you use the 'proper' rsync, and not the hfs
version. I screwed my /sw up by (inadvertently) using the hfs version
On Dec 31, 2003, at 4:45 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Michèle Garoche wrote:
[]
Are those warnings normal?
Yes, it appears so. At first, I found them not very logical - they
shouldn't say because, but although - but apparently you have to
read them as prebinding not (disabled because of foo). In
On Dec 31, 2003, at 1:43 AM, Michel Peyrard wrote:
I have having some difficulties compiling the plplot package and I
noticed that g77 provided by fink is 3.4 while gcc of the Apple
Developer
tools is 3.3.
There seems to be some inconsistency that could explain my problem.
You need to start
On Dec 30, 2003, at 1:43 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
William Hunter wrote:
[]
dpkg: error processing
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/perlmods/
libnet-pm58
1_1.17-10_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install):
trying to overwrite `/sw/share/man/man3/Net::Cmd.3pm', which is also
in
On Dec 31, 2003, at 4:48 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Roberto Manuel Latorre wrote:
[]
dpkg: error processing
/sw/fink/dists/unstable/main/binary-darwin-powerpc/libs/perlmods/
date-manip-pm581_5.42a-10_darwin-powerpc.deb (--install):
trying to overwrite `/sw/share/man/man3/Date::Manip.3pm',
On Dec 30, 2003, at 9:35 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote:
Le 30 déc. 2003, à 18:23, Martin Costabel a écrit :
Michèle Garoche wrote:
[]
bonobo-activation-fork-server.c: In function
`bonobo_activation_server_by_forking':
bonobo-activation-fork-server.c:289: error: `LincWatch' undeclared
[]
Failed:
The binary distro is simply behind the source distro. This basically
always the case. No more information is needed.
One day we will add to fink the ability to hold packages at a certain
revision, stick to binary packages via 'fink' command, etc, but not
yet.
-Ben
On Dec 28, 2003, at 9:58
Try installing it with dpkg.
sudo dpkg -i /sw/fink/debs/fink_0.17.1-1_darwin-powerpc.deb
I must say i wish someone would have tested updating before making such
a basic change to fink.
-Ben
On Dec 25, 2003, at 8:30 PM, Avram Dorfman wrote:
The fix recipe below does not work for me either.
This should be fixed now, i updated it to 2.1 and removed an outdated
getopt patch which was causing the problem i suspect.
-Ben
On Dec 18, 2003, at 6:30 AM, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
I *know* it was working at one point...but that was back when I was
running 10.2. I didn't think to try it
Somehow the -laspell is not getting into the link line.
First just try what it says here:
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-general.php#compile-myself
If that doesn't work, come back.
-Ben
On Dec 10, 2003, at 11:26 AM, GoochRules! wrote:
Does here anyone have any ideas about this? It
For fox looks like you just need --with-opengl=opengl
There is a fink package in the 10.2-gcc3.3 tree. I'll move it over to
10.3 tree.
-Ben
On Dec 17, 2003, at 6:20 AM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
It's probably not a Fink problem.
You may have to tell the package's configure script where the
On Dec 16, 2003, at 10:26 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
We were not talking about installed files, but about files avialable
for installation.
Also we do have to also trust dpkg's 'body count' if it says there is a
later version of a package which is already installed (even partial)...
it is
On Dec 16, 2003, at 12:04 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Except that in the case at hand mutt was not installed at all. Only
its config files were left, beause it was not purged. I would consider
this at least counter-intuitive behaviour (not to say bug) that fink
in this case refuses to install
On Dec 16, 2003, at 10:26 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
you get the impression that something is not right, whatever the
interior mechanism is. You always ask why does it try to install
version x.y-z when it damn well knows that this doesn't exist?
I agree with you dude. Did I argue against this?
On Dec 8, 2003, at 1:16 PM, Claus Atzenbeck wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Martin Costabel wrote:
No idea, sorry. But you can try to do
fink install mutt-1.4i-21
to force the installation of the new version.
I did fink purge mutt. This has solved the problem. Don't ask me
why, but after that
As far as i can tell, the dictionaries DON'T depend on the shlibs OR
builddepend on the -dev. They appear to build and work fine just
depending on aspell, which depends on its shlibs and dev.
The shlibs and dev are for third-party apps that embed aspell.
-Ben
On Dec 8, 2003, at 11:04 AM,
Run fink selfupdate. Current is 1.2.5-12 in the 10.3 tree. I just put
it in stable as well.
-Ben
On Dec 8, 2003, at 3:38 PM, GoochRules! wrote:
Failed: compiling sdl-mixer-1.2.5-11 failed
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net
On Nov 25, 2003, at 8:51 PM, Daniel Macks wrote:
Okay, so you've got python2.2 and pygtk2-py22 installed. From a
terminal window, what's the output of 'fink list pygtk' (without the
quotes)? There may be some weird interactions if more than one version
of pygtk is installed concurrently.
gramps
On Nov 19, 2003, at 1:18 PM, Nolan J. Darilek wrote:
I've done a fink selfupdate recently, and the behavior began
again. My powerbook now prompts for a login and password when
booted. Before, the situation was very cut-n-dry, as I'd installed
This has nothing to do with fink and could not have
Those instructions are out of date. Just 'fink install gift'.
-Ben
On Oct 20, 2003, at 7:22 AM, Susheel Daswani wrote:
Hi Fink Users!
Has anyone successfully compiled giFT on OS X with some support from
Fink? I found a website that details the process:
http://www.gottsilla.net/gift/ .
Uh, why the hell would we do that? It works fine. We have plenty of
unmaintained packages. No reason to remove a perfectly working and
popular package which might be missing some obscure rmail script.
The postfix maintainer posted in july that he would update the package.
I haven't heard
I'd suggest [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for this, or at the very least,
fink-devel.
But to answer - no. You will probably need to actually port the code.
What package, why does it need these things?
-Ben
On Friday, September 5, 2003, at 03:16 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
I have a package that uses
On Thursday, August 28, 2003, at 10:02 AM, Viv Kendon wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Martin Costabel wrote:
master:master:master:master..., huh?
This seems to have been the same problem. The thread doesn't offer a
clear explanation of this phenomenon, but fink (the package) was
changed
on 13 June
On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 04:17 PM, Jens Nockel wrote:
packages will survive this. For example, scientific programs like R,
Numeric Python, octave etc. may be compiled with ATLAS or Altivec
support.
1. Those are about the only packages which do that (generally, fink
packages do not and
_Sm* is all from libSM, part of xfree86. What versions of xfree86 do
you have installed? Apple's? Fink's?
-Ben
On Tuesday, August 12, 2003, at 08:28 PM, Kurt Fleschner wrote:
Now, I'm stumped on whats causing all this to not build. Anyone have
any ideas on how to fix this? Thanks.
On Sunday, August 10, 2003, at 01:56 AM, Asko Kauppi wrote:
I was surprised to see that 'libffi' (foreign function interface) is
not available as a fink module.
Is there a reason for this, or just that no-one's needed / had the
time to port it?
Fink just includes what people care to
On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 10:34 AM, Geoff Smith wrote:
I have fink installed, but only version 0.12.1-1, or 0.5.2 (not really
sure about the numbering scheme). The results of a fink selfupdate
follow:
This was a known bug in fink 0.12.1.
See
On Wednesday, July 9, 2003, at 08:05 AM, Mark Stosberg wrote:
nt.
So here's why I'm stuck compiling it. I'm gettin a whole slew of errors
like this:
#
symbol _Load_Device used from dynamic library
/sw/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.dylib(ftxopen.lo) not from earlier dynamic
library
On Saturday, July 12, 2003, at 05:20 AM, Alexander K. Hansen wrote:
You wouldn't be able to remove passwd until you remove everything else,
since it's a base package. I'm not sure if fink purge takes out the
daemon users, but it should, by rights.
base packages CAN be removed. Only 'Essential'
We should add these fixes to our autoconf packages and ALL broken
fortran packages. It is legitimate to file bugs on all of them, since
they do not work and it is fixable.
-Ben
On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 10:46 AM, jfm wrote:
On Friday, Jul 11, 2003, at 18:58 Europe/Brussels,
[EMAIL
On Saturday, June 28, 2003, at 01:16 AM, Jonas Steverud wrote:
Something that struk me yesterday was that in Debian there are a lot
of packages that doesn't contain any binaries, like the ispell
dictionaries, and it would be nice if those where available in fink
too. My question now is how much
On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 01:34 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 3:30 PM -0400 6/24/03, sinclair44 wrote:
On 6/24/03 3:05 PM, Paul Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I got a copy of the file I need from ftp.gnupg.ca. Where do I
put
it to make Fink think that it already has the file so it can
On Monday, June 23, 2003, at 08:06 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote:
I'd like to know if it's advisable now to use the gcc 3.3 as default
compiler right now or does it conflict with the way Fink operates?
Michèle
Many packages will not yet compile with 3.3, including apt.
Additionally there are ABI
On Saturday, June 21, 2003, at 09:12 AM, Jerry Talkington wrote:
If you need this feature, you could work on updating this patch--it's
now a bit old. Also, you could help figure out how we should handle
packages that need root privileges, like passwd (adding users),
passwd and similar packages
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 10:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all:
I have a package on my machine that has a default value compiled in.
I would like to change the default value, which involves modifying one
line of source code. How can I interrupt the installation process so
diff -u
On Wednesday, June 11, 2003, at 02:43 PM, Michèle Garoche wrote:
I've launched fink selfupdate-cvs at 5:33 am (UCT +2) today. Then fink
update-all. I've never seen those sw_vers zombies before. fink
update-all is not finished yet (kde compiling still in progress).
Does somebody have any idea
For sources, you can do it now. Update to fink 0.13.0 and add your URL
to the file:
/sw/lib/fink/mirror/master
(see the other files there for the format)
then run 'fink configure' and select MasterFirst, and select your site
as the chosen mirror.
-Ben
On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 07:59 PM,
On Monday, June 9, 2003, at 04:18 PM, Chuck Robey wrote:
You're right. I went reading into it to write up a patch, and found it
too. I've thought up several other ways to screw it up, but they won't
work in this situation.
While you are patching fink cvs commands, how about making it work if
I'll resurrect the old package as 1.19 and remove vasi as maintainer
since he doesn't want to it seems.
-Ben
On Thursday, June 5, 2003, at 01:28 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
It sounds like you just volunteered ;-)
Actually, it looks like groff-1.19 works without doing any patching:
I
On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 10:30 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
Source-MD5: c12bf574120df33ec8c18d92703e099e
DocFiles: BUG-REPORT COPYING NEWS PROBLEMS README
-ConfigureParams: --mandir=%i/share/man/ --infodir=%i/share/info
+ConfigureParams: --mandir=%i/share/man/ --infodir=%i/share/info
On Friday, April 11, 2003, at 03:52 PM, David Orlovich wrote:
Something I noticed is that one of the -p options that (I think)
autoconfig determined for gcc is `-pthreads' and I keep getting the
error:
gcc: unrecognized option `-pthreads'
It is not an 'error'. It is a warning. Don't use the
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 12:57 AM, Martin Costabel wrote:
Fink has the findutils package that installs GNU find. I don't run it
here, because it insists on installing anacron and daemonic which I
don't want.
Actually it just 'insists on' cron-service. (btw: the word is
Depends: on,
On Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at 04:02 PM, Tom Dove wrote:
..
audioiocoreaudio.cc: In function `OSStatus PropertyListenerProc(long
unsigned
int, void*)':
audioiocoreaudio.cc:611: warning: unused variable `UInt32 propertySize'
audioiocoreaudio.cc:612: warning: unused variable `AudioDeviceID
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 06:07 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
On my system, glibtool is provided by libtool14. Install it if you
don't
have it, and rebuild it if you do.
No, it isn't. /usr/bin/glibtool comes with the Developer Tools. Anyone
who is missing it shoudl reinstall the december
Install the Java 1.4 SDK from connect.apple.com.
This is the Java problem i mentioned a few days ago on the list. (it
may need to go in the faq, until someone makes a java virtual package)
-Ben
On Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 08:52 PM, Kow K wrote:
A build of rpm-4.0.4-1 failed on Fink
On Saturday, February 22, 2003, at 06:37 PM, Paul McNabola wrote:
I can't locate a CoreFoundation.h on my machine and wonder where it
might be
from. I have Dev Tools Dec 2002 installed on 10.2.4.
Reinstall them, then, the install must not have completed.
-Ben
On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 01:27 PM, Jeff Whitaker wrote:
fink rebuild nedit should do it.
Or just fink update-all, really.
-Ben
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and
No, you should ignore those warnings. dpkg overwrites them at deb
install time perl is confused because it sees the old versions under
/sw while it is installing a new version into the deb root. If you rm
them yourself you will remove the new versions!
-Ben
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 08:23 AM, Enrico Franconi wrote:
The following are the (many more) commands which are in GW tex but not
in
fink tetex:
Lots of those things are in other fink packages. For example t1binary,
t1ascii, etc are in the t1utils package.
GW likes to spread
You probably need to wait a few minutes. It takes that long to launch.
Really.
-Ben
On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 01:40 PM, Alexander Hansen wrote:
If everything is set up properly, then when you invoke /sw/bin/kword,
(for example), you should get a bunch of messages in your terminal
On Wednesday, February 12, 2003, at 01:11 PM, Chris Devers wrote:
Sorry if this is in the archives, I poked around but didn't see
anything
really related to this.
Why is it that Fink's pine uw-imapd (or uw-imapd-ssl) packages can't
be
installed at the same time? You can have a mail client
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, at 12:54 PM, Nicholas Riley wrote:
The problem with 1.4.2 seems obvious; the problem with 1.4.3 is that,
no matter what I try to do (RangerRick suggested CC=c++) libtool
uses gcc for linking. If I try to use -lstdc++, libtool 1.4.3
complains that it can't link
-0.20.5-1 failed
There seems to be some confusion about neon. It wants neon 18 and 23...
Any ideas?
Ken
On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 05:37 AM, Ben Hines wrote:
On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 02:14 AM, Ken Botwinick wrote:
I'll update the package and try to add netrc support. Why not just
This is very bad. Fink users, don't install this.
Virex 7.2, free to all .mac members installs:
/Volumes/Virex 7.2.dmg/Virex 7.2.pkg 328 % lsbom Contents/Resources/Virex\ 7.2.bom | grep sw
./sw40775 0/80
./sw/lib40775 0/80
./sw/lib/libcrypto.0.9.6.dylib 100644 0/80945416
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 03:16 PM, Michael Bovee wrote:
Okay one more,
I wanted to try to 'wget' some stuff from that there internet. Just
to be sure I tried it in Terminal first and got 'command not found'. I
figured this was not part of the default install anyway, so after
On Thursday, January 30, 2003, at 06:01 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
In case folks haven't noticed, there is a major
problem with the perl script to fix the shared lib
names for the MacOS X X11 beta files. If you look
at the log from update_prebinding on a machine
that has had the perl script
Aha, i see. You can fix that by updating the install_name in binaries
that were built against the bad X11 libs.
I'll enhance the script to fix those too. Will post when i get it
working.
Anyway - this problem is not major - major was the massive build
failures apple's broken libraries caused.
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 07:39 AM, Justin Wright wrote:
I recently upgraded to Jaguar, and subsequently upgraded fink.
finkcommander shows readline 4.2a-5 and mysql 3.23.49-2 installed.
Your fink update did not complete properly, those are 10.1 versions.
Do all the steps on:
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 07:22 PM, David R. Morrison wrote:
The warning is confusing, because it refers to libpng, but the fix
actually
has to do with the imlib package. Until amaya can be updated, you
should
downgrade imlib as described on Fink's webpage.
It was updated before
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 08:13 AM, H.Fagard wrote:
At 10:57 -0500 23/01/03, Alexander Hansen wrote:
Have you tried setting HTTP_PROXY et al. in the FC Preferences?
See my first message:
At 15:04 +0100 23/01/03, H.Fagard wrote:
I have checked the proxy settings in
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 06:28 PM, Rogério Brito wrote:
On Jan 21 2003, Martin Costabel wrote:
Rogério Brito wrote:
BTW, as another question, is there any reason (lack of
manpower, perhaps) on why the urlview isn't present in fink?
You know, of course, the package request
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 12:13 PM, Alexandre Enkerli wrote:
I have no idea if this has to do with fink, but maybe I can find help
here. Some packages I'm trying to install from source generate errors
at make. Here's this error in the context of compiling the latest
version of
Please send me your full libusb build log. (off list)
-Ben
On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 05:20 AM, lenny bruce wrote:
For a long time now I couldn't get
Speex 1.0beta3-2 or LibUSB 0.1.7-1 to update.
Speex finally built tonight for some unknown reason
but LibUSB is still failing:
ld:
On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 11:15 PM, Gary Elshaw wrote:
Anyone have any idea what's going on here?
Usage: head [-options] url...
http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/comp-general.php#head
-Ben
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 04:57 AM, Marcus Bointon wrote:
If anyone is installing mpg123, I think you should read this:
http://security-archive.merton.ox.ac.uk/bugtraq-200301/0137.html
True, but it is highly unlikely that one would make a trojaned .mp3
that targets OS X powerpc,
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 01:20 PM, Gary Olson wrote:
I tried to remove xml-parser-pm (which requires removing some other
perlmods first) thinking that I could then download and recompile this
perlmod. Then I would try updating again. However, I can not remove
it using apt-get,
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 05:42 PM, Don Thompson wrote:
Dear List-Members,
I have recently removed my old Fink installation. I then down loaded
the Fink 0.5.0a Binary Installer and attempted to install the new
version. This failed apparently because I have set-up a symbolic link
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 06:13 PM, Don Thompson wrote:
Ben,
I had thought about that; however, the FAQ and prior experience on my
part would suggest that there will be questionable results with this
approach. Earlier releases of fink have numerous hard coded paths to
the install
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 09:49 AM, Justin Walker wrote:
Perhaps 'otool' will help. If the threaded libraries are
distinguished by name, you can tell by looking at the output from
'otool -Lv YourBinaryHere'.
... except that they aren't distinguished by name. :)
I refer you to
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 10:54 AM, Michèle Garoche wrote:
Le jeudi, 9 jan 2003, à 19:46 Europe/Paris, Alexander Hansen a écrit :
Have you tried removing xfree86-rootless-threaded first?
Same.
sudo /sw/bin/fink remove xfree86-rootless-threaded
Password:
Information about 2063
And you'll need to reinstall apple's X11 packages afterwards as well,
because you corrupted your install by installing them first.
-Ben
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 11:04 AM, David R. Morrison wrote:
Try the instructions:
On Wednesday, January 8, 2003, at 11:15 AM, Hal Sadofsky wrote:
1) does Apple's new XonX run rooted as well as rootless?
No.
2) does it take more advantage (rooted) of the hardware? (Certain
things - scrolling, moving windows - are very slow on my ibook for
example.)
It is always in
On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 03:09 PM, Isreal Packard wrote:
I've installed the December developer tools. Same results.
2002? Not 2001?
Still need more info, like versions of everything fink you have. And
whether you have any GNU-Darwin corruption on your system.
-Ben
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 12:26 PM, Jeffrey Sanders wrote:
I installed it. Seems okay. I ran Gimp with it. The odd thing is
that it
is still running window maker instead of it's own window manager. If
anyone
can figure out what it's window manager is called, I would love to try
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 01:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Odd number of elements in hash assignment at
/sw/lib/perl5/Fink/PkgVersion.pm line 1730.
What do you get when you type:
sh -c . /sw/bin/init.sh; /usr/bin/env
---
This
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 03:46 PM, Vivien Mary Kendon wrote:
I can confirm that it doesn't in any way interfere with my already
fink-installed xfree86/XDarwin stuff. I removed nothing, and installed
without adding the X11 config (the default, as Kow pointed out).
Actually, it does
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 08:24 PM, Wolfgang Rumpf wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there any way to get common clipboard functionality between, say,
Microsoft Word (or any other OS X application) and an X app? For
example, I want to copy an image from GIMP and
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 11:34 AM, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/
Just thought y'all should know :-)
-- Finlay
The user install download link at
http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/download/ is broken currently. The SDK
posted there won't help anyone, its just
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 12:00 PM, Liam mac Lynne wrote:
The binary installer appears to be up now -
http://www.apple.com/macosx/x11/download, but I don't have access to
a
Mac at work to check that the ~4 MB file is the real McCoy.
Slan,
Liam
You need both the 41MB (user) and 4MB
On Sunday, January 5, 2003, at 10:17 PM, Martin Costabel wrote:
No. I would be against installing it by default. It seems you have to
take time to learn how to configure it or clean it up from time to
time or whatever. I had a bad experience where every compilation
slowed down to a crawl
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 03:23 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
work. Then it was pointed out that you're not supposed to depend on
-dev packages so I removed it (which in this case, I don't agree with,
but what the hey). =)
You don't agree with the ability to have multiple versions of
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 06:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whenever I try to run a gdal program, I always get this error: dyld:
gdal_translate can't open library: ./libgdal.1.1.dylib (No such file
or directory, errno = 2)
This means the install_name of the library is wrong:
%
On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 07:35 PM, Kow K wrote:
While this error isn't fatal, I think it would be helpful to indicate
this at the beginning of the update process, with a user prompt like:
Note: packages qt3-3.1.1-1 ... need Dec 2002 Developer Tools installed.
Do you have it already?
On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 05:16 PM, Stephen Anderson wrote:
releases). Here's the tail end of the output from fink selfupdate-cvs
: I hope someone can spot the (no doubt trivial) error I've made.
There's no obvious problem with the directory
/sw/fink/10.2/stable/crypto asfar as I
On Thursday, December 26, 2002, at 01:35 PM, Paolo Cacciatori wrote:
Ideas?
You need to include the package version, fink version (fink -V), etc in
any problem emails, otherwise we have no chance of helping.
-Ben
---
This sf.net
On Wednesday, December 25, 2002, at 12:26 PM, lenny bruce wrote:
I believe we're being cheated by a transparent payware conspiracy.
We're the only platform where HW OpenGL for XFree86 is payware.
It must be political.
Erm, nice try at a conspiracy theory, but hardware OpenGL support for
1 - 100 of 386 matches
Mail list logo
