[Cargo] Missing some dep in Gump's local Maven Repository

Hi, The cargo build (http://tinyurl.com/bg2h2) is missing the following file: commons-jelly-tags-util-20030211.141939.jar This file is present on ibiblio: http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/commons-jelly/jars/ Does it mean the local Maven install has no remote repo set up to prevent downloads? If so,

FW: [GUMP@brutus]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-integration-ant-13 prerequisite failed

ginal Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 25 May 2004 01:13 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-integration-ant-13 > prerequisite failed > > To whom it may satisfy... > > This is an automated

FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

moved yesterday the that was inside the tag. It is now outside the tag. That was to work around another Gumpy bug (http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/GUMP-46). Any idea? Thanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 03 April 2

RE: FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

> -Original Message- > From: Adam R. B. Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 April 2004 16:29 > To: Gump code and data > Subject: Re: FW: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet- > 13 failed > > > > I've used the build log: > > > > > >

RE: FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 April 2004 10:56 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FW: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet- > 13 failed > > On Fri, 2 Apr 2004, Vincent Massol &

RE: FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 April 2004 09:09 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FW: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet- > 13 failed > > On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Vincent Massol &

[repost] FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

Hi, Does anyone have an idea what the error below is about? It seems like an Ant bug to me but I'm not sure. In any case it works fine on my local build on 2 different machines. Thanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent:

FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-13 failed

Hi, Does anyone have an idea what the error below is about? It seems like an Ant bug to me but I'm not sure. Thanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 01 April 2004 06:54 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [EMAIL

RE: Something wrong today with Gumpy?

Or is it because of the change to Gumpy (inherit_none)? Thanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 March 2004 08:26 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Something wrong today with Gumpy? > > Anything wrong? It see

RE: FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-framework-12 failed

Adam > - Original Message - > From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 1:30 AM > Subject: Re: FW: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-framework-12 > failed > > > >

RE: [RT] Source difference report between 2 gump build states

> -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 March 2004 09:10 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [RT] Source difference report between 2 gump build states > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Vin

FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-framework-12 failed

definition: I don't understand why it would inherit all dependencies defines in httpunit. There's no inherit="true", and the httpunit project only declares a single jar: Any idea? Thanks -Vincent > -----Original Message- >

RE: [RT] Source difference report between 2 gump build states

> -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 March 2004 00:19 > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: [RT] Source difference report between 2 gump build states > > Hi, > > I have posted this idea under the thread &q

RE: [Cactus] Gump build failure: Culprit found!

> -Original Message- > From: Nick Chalko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 March 2004 23:03 > To: Gump code and data > Subject: Re: [Cactus] Gump build failure: Culprit found! > > Updates made > Vincent Massol wrote: > > >>-Original Messag

RE: [Cactus] Gump build failure: Culprit found!

> -Original Message- > From: Nick Chalko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 March 2004 22:24 > To: Gump code and data > Subject: Re: [Cactus] Gump build failure: Culprit found! > > I am preparing to blog this at > http://gump.chalko.com/gb/blog/Issues/?smm=y&permalink=Cactus- > CommonsH

RE: [Request] Make gump build directories browsable

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 March 2004 10:58 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Request] Make gump build directories browsable > > On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

RE: [Request] Make gump build directories browsable

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 March 2004 10:20 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Request] Make gump build directories browsable > > On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > &g

FW: [Cactus] Gump build failures for the past 2 weeks

rst beta. Once we have the new API > agreed, we can think of a migration path which may involve a (1) > compatibility layer, (2) manual code conversion, (3) automatic code > conversion, (4) some combination of 1, 2, and 3. > > Oleg > > > On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 08:09,

[Cactus] Gump build failures for the past 2 weeks

Hi guys, I've finally tracked down the Cactus gump build problem we've been having for the past 2 weeks. It appears to be caused by some change in commons-httpclient. The build is working fine with version 2.0 and failing on some authentication code with a commons-httpclient built from CVS HEAD.

[RT] Source difference report between 2 gump build states

Hi, I have posted this idea under the thread "[Cactus] Gump build failure: Culprit found!" but I'm reposting it here as I'm not sure everyone will read the cactus stuff and I think this is an "interesting idea"... :-) Idea: It would be nice if Gump would be able to do a source diff of a project d

[Cactus] Gump build failure: Culprit found!

Hi guys, I should have known better... After a few hours of debugging and thanks to Leo for giving me access to LSD, I have found the culprit. The hunt is over! The culprit is: commons-httpclient It works fine with version 2.0 of commons-httpclient but not with the latest version from HEAD. Now,

RE: Gump Ant command line available?

> -Original Message- > From: Adam R. B. Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 March 2004 22:29 > To: Gump code and data > Subject: Re: Gump Ant command line available? > > > > Hey, that's very cool! I didn't know it existed... > > Yup, we are working to make Gumpy more transparent,

RE: Gump Ant command line available?

Hey, that's very cool! I didn't know it existed... Thanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Adam R. B. Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 March 2004 22:12 > To: Gump code and data > Subject: Re: Gump Ant command line available? > > > I'm still trying to debug the Cactus gump

Gump Ant command line available?

Hi, I'm still trying to debug the Cactus gump build. I'd like to build my project locally using the Ant command line has run on the failed project. Is that information available somewhere (i.e. is there a place I can copy-paste it from)? That would be quite useful. I cannot find it on http://lsd

RE: [Help] Help required to debug a cactus gump build!

Hi Adam, > -Original Message- > From: Adam R. B. Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 March 2004 21:24 > To: Gump code and data > Subject: Re: [Help] Help required to debug a cactus gump build! > > > Could someone make available the jakarta-tomcat/ gumpy build directory > > somewhere

RE: [Request] Make gump build directories browsable

27;ll take the offer so that I can try debugging the Cactus gump build. Thanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 March 2004 18:01 > To: Gump code and data > Subject: Re: [Request] Make gump build directories

[Request] Make gump build directories browsable

Hi, Would it be possible to make the gump build directories browsable. It's just a pain to debug gump and find where the problem is. Making these directories visible will help a lot. I've been trying to debug a cactus gump build problem for a week now with no success. Every time I have to rely o

[Help] Help required to debug a cactus gump build!

Hi, Could someone make available the jakarta-tomcat/ gumpy build directory somewhere (i.e. the /data3/gump/jakarta-tomcat/build/tomcat/ dir)? I need this to continue debugging http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample- servlet-12.html Thanks! -Vincent Note1: that w

[Cactus] continuing the debugging

Hi, Could someone make available the jakarta-tomcat/ gumpy build directory somewhere (i.e. the /data3/gump/jakarta-tomcat/build/tomcat/ dir)? I need this to continue debugging http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample- servlet-12.html Thanks! -Vincent Note: that wo

RE: [Cactus] commons-codec added to dependency jars?

> -Original Message- > From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 March 2004 21:09 > To: Gump code and data > Subject: Re: [Cactus] commons-codec added to dependency jars? > > Vincent Massol wrote: > > > > The way I code is as fo

RE: [Cactus] commons-codec added to dependency jars?

Hi Stefano, > -Original Message- > From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 March 2004 15:31 > To: Gump code and data > Subject: Re: [Cactus] commons-codec added to dependency jars? [snip] > > Again the problem is the same. I don't have access to a gump machine and >

RE: How to debug a Gump build problem?

f the jakarta-tomcat/ build directory somewhere (i.e. the /data3/gump/jakarta-tomcat/build/tomcat/ dir)? I'd like to try to run the samples by pointing to this Tomcat install and see what happens. Thanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

RE: How to debug a Gump build problem?

Wow. Good debugging! Thanks Stefan for your help. I'm trying to run the cactus build on cvs.apache.org to see if I can reproduce the problem. I'll let you know as I make progress. Thanks -Vincent > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 March 2004

RE: How to debug a Gump build problem?

; -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 March 2004 11:21 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: How to debug a Gump build problem? > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >

[RT] Gumpy deploying websites?

Hi, In the past, Sam had provided some configuration so that Gump would upload every day the Cactus website (built as part of the Cactus build) to jakarta.apache.org/cactus. That was quite nice. I'd love to see Gump(y) add even more value to projects (such as deploying their web sites every night

RE: How to debug a Gump build problem?

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 March 2004 10:45 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: How to debug a Gump build problem? > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

RE: [Cactus] commons-codec added to dependency jars?

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 March 2004 10:31 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Cactus] commons-codec added to dependency jars? > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

RE: How to debug a Gump build problem?

MAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 March 2004 10:06 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: How to debug a Gump build problem? > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Everything runs fine here. Thus I think it can be caused either by a > &g

[Cactus] commons-codec added to dependency jars?

Hi, It seems that the following line was added to the Cactus descriptor: However, Cactus does not use directly commons-code. It may be used by a cactus dependency like Tomcat, Commons HttpClient or others. Wouldn't it be better to add this dependency to the project directly using it and then us

RE: [RT] Moving gump forward

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 March 2004 09:28 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [RT] Moving gump forward > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What do you mea

How to debug a Gump build problem? (was FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-12 failed)

> -Original Message----- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 March 2004 06:04 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-12 > failed > > To whom it may engage... > > This is an automated

RE: [RT] Moving gump forward

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 11 March 2004 08:37 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [RT] Moving gump forward > > On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Vincent Massol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Stefan

RE: [RT] Moving gump forward

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 March 2004 11:01 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [RT] Moving gump forward > [snip] > > or, eventually, how can gump execute ant forcing the task to > > be our own? > > Easy, write an adapter and s

FW: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-12 failed

ncent > -Original Message- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 29 February 2004 06:50 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: jakarta-cactus/jakarta-cactus-sample-servlet-12 > failed > > To whom it may engage... > > This is an automa