On 2015-08-04 13:01, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
...Which would be totally fine and gets us back to the point Daniel and I were
discussing: a release compliance team (horrible name, I know) as part of ASF
IMO
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
...Which would be totally fine and gets us back to the point Daniel and I were
discussing: a release compliance team (horrible name, I know) as part of
ASF
IMO it's not a team that's needed, just a clear and
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
...Next time I will archive such mails in my mail program instead. Learned
something for the future...
Markmail is pretty useful here:
sorry, I really tried, but it seems google is not a suitable tool to
search through the incubator general list. It shows by far not all
results it should show. There is a hint that some results are not shown
because of privacy protection. Searching for my own name for exmaple
shows only a
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Daniel Dekany ddek...@freemail.hu wrote:
Please give me write access on https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/!
Name: DanielDekany
Done.
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Please give me write access on https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/!
Name: DanielDekany
(I'm an initial comitter at FreeMarker:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/freemarker.html)
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
-
To unsubscribe,
Am 03.08.2015 21:46, schrieb David Nalley:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 5:55 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Hi all,
some of the general discussion recently made me wonder about one point with
regards to binary distributions. It was pointed out, that a binary
distribution of a source
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
...It was pointed out, that a binary
distribution of a source code release has to be handled like a release
itself, and that there should be no download source of it outside of apache.
This seems to be one
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
On 2015-08-04 13:01, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
... IMO the Incubator PMC can very much own this checklist, and I
volunteer to contribute to creating it...
If interested, I would very much like to work with
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
For some reason I am not able to edit any pages on the incubator wiki. I
could swear I used to be able to do that. Does someone have karma to fix
this?
Like all Apache wikis, the Incubator wiki had to implement
Can you provide a pointer to a specific example of what you mean?
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Arvind Prabhakar arv...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org
wrote:
In fact, in my opinion it leads to the very unfortunate side effect
Sorry, my comment was too brief.
I understand the maturity model to be something to aspire to and that Apache
Projects will always be working toward it. I mean TLPs, not podlings, although
podlings should be aware of it and also aspire to it.
I was commending the structure and clarity of
Who are the village spinsters?
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 03.08.2015 21:51, Julian Hyde wrote:
In my experience incubating Calcite, the “overhead” was mostly the
infrastructure and process, not politics. (If you think the incubator is
political,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 3:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org
wrote:
...Next time I will archive such mails in my mail program instead.
Learned
something for the future...
Markmail is pretty useful
Hi,
Just catching up on this thread. Going back a bit.
#2 The #1 goal is achieved via mentorship. In fact mentorship is
not even required as the case of Zest (and hopeful Yetus soon) demonstrated.
Not to pick on Zest but a casual glance at the current source release shows it
contains a
For some reason I am not able to edit any pages on the incubator wiki. I could
swear I used to be able to do that. Does someone have karma to fix this?
Ralph
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
+1 on how to start, with the maturity model as exemplar, is an outstanding
idea. Thanks.
(I even have a poddling in mind for stress-testing it.)
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 05:57
To: Incubator
As an immediate start to having a tool to support mentors and TLPs you might
want to consider providing a Rat service. Rat is already very useful.
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Daniel Grunomailto:humbed...@apache.org
Sent: 8/4/2015 4:15 AM
To:
Since I +1d Romans comment I also want to draw attention to your valuable
observation on the topic:
A lot of companies seem to view any friction (e.g. actually complying
with policies that put community over code) as political overhead
that makes joining the foundation undesirable.
+1 to that
On 4 August 2015 at 18:46, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
+1 on how to start, with the maturity model as exemplar, is an outstanding
idea. Thanks.
(I even have a poddling in mind for stress-testing it.)
It is clear to me, that incubator offer many advantages...but our current
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015, at 07:06 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
That said, I have personally been in positions where I have seen IPMC
members ask - and even demand things at times - that I feel are
unreasonable requests for the podling. The reason I do not challenge
those is because I feel that
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015, at 03:13 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015, at 10:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
I've been waiting for a bout a week for other to chime in, but
it seems that nobody has so I'll repeat my
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015, at 12:23 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
It's hard to get the balance right between appropriate oversight and
unwanted meddling.
No argument there. I'm unconvinced that a restructuring of the
IPMC/PPMC/Mentorship structure as it is today will solve that, though it
might push it
On 08/04/2015 02:45 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
Sorry if it rubs the wrong way. However, we just have seen through the Ignite
discussion (most recent one) the examples where personal expectations were
represented as graduation requirements. It is perhaps in good faith - I am not
questioning
Sorry if it rubs the wrong way. However, we just have seen through the Ignite
discussion (most recent one) the examples where personal expectations were
represented as graduation requirements. It is perhaps in good faith - I am not
questioning the intention. I am saying that when requirements are
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
It was also mentioned here, that for example publishing snapshot builds to
maven central is not allowed. I guess in the release document they are
basically to be handled as nightly builds and as such not for the general
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 02:50PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
On 08/04/2015 02:45 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
Sorry if it rubs the wrong way. However, we just have seen through the
Ignite
discussion (most recent one) the examples where personal expectations were
represented as graduation
Along these lines, also consider using DRAT:
http://github.com/chrismattmann/drat/
Think of it as RAT at scale with progress logs, Tika-based MIME
file identification. Presentations, videos, and docs are on the
page.
++
Chris
Cos,
There is no bureaucratism outbreak. People are not express[ing]
their expectations as a law-of-the-land. People are trying, in good
faith, to make sure that decisions are made consistent with the Apache
ethos. And before you ask, no, that ethos cannot be written down; it
has to be
29 matches
Mail list logo
