Well, let me put it this way: it would be kinda dumb to run our
public wiki site on another wiki engine. ;-)
Dumb? So we must already be dumb, then, to be running other things
like JVMs
that don't come from the ASF, rather than our own.
Nonono, what I meant was that it would be odd to have
On 9/6/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> While agreeing that it's something that needs looking at closely, I'm
> not I'm not sure it's downbeat as I think you're suggesting. The
> 3rd-party licencing policy at http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
> redirects to the draft at http://pe
On 9/6/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/6/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > While agreeing that it's something that needs looking at closely, I'm
> > not I'm not sure it's downbeat as I think you're suggesting. The
> > 3rd-party licencing policy at http://www.apac
On 9/6/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/6/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > While agreeing that it's something that needs looking at closely, I'm
> > not I'm not sure it's downbeat as I think you're suggesting. The
> > 3rd-party licencing policy at http://www.ap
On 6 Sep 2007, at 17:20, Gwyn Evans wrote:
While agreeing that it's something that needs looking at closely, I'm
not I'm not sure it's downbeat as I think you're suggesting. The
3rd-party licencing policy at http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
redirects to the draft at http://people.apache.
Is there a roadmap for when JSPWiki will have all of the features and
functionality of both Confluence and MoinMoin, including the
Confluence
macros we use, and the migration tools so that we can move all the
existing
data from these existing wikis to JSPWiki? Without that, I don't
see us
re
On 9/6/07, Garrett Rooney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/6/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/6/07, Gwyn Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > While agreeing that it's something that needs looking at closely, I'm
> > > not I'm not sure it's downbeat as I think you're
On Thursday, September 6, 2007, 6:18:42 PM, Janne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6 Sep 2007, at 17:20, Gwyn Evans wrote:
>> While agreeing that it's something that needs looking at closely, I'm
>> not I'm not sure it's downbeat as I think you're suggesting. The
>> 3rd-party licencing policy at h
Hi,
On 9/6/07, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a concrete example, look at Axis. At some point in its lifetime, WSDL4J
> was added to the distribution, and that's licensed under the CPL. Someone
> coming in and looking at Axis might reasonably assume that it's licensed
> under the Ap
Folks,
these concerns are very valid and good and Janne has demonstrated that
he is aware of this.
However, most of the vetting required is actually *part* of the
incubation process and happens after acceptance into the incubator. So
can we just postpone that discussion a bit and assimilate them
On Saturday 08 September 2007 17:41, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> these concerns are very valid and good and Janne has demonstrated that
> he is aware of this.
>
> However, most of the vetting required is actually *part* of the
> incubation process and happens after acceptance into the incubator
On 9/8/07, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1. The fact that Janne pointed to a web page listing all the potential
> hazards, is a VERY GOOD sign that he has at least as good grip of the
> situation as the average Java project at Apache. And definitely good enough
> for me to start incu
+1
2007/8/30, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello all!
>
> I am Janne Jalkanen, the lead developer of the open source wiki
> engine called JSPWiki, and I have a proposal for your enjoyment.
> This proposal is available in the web at http://www.jspwiki.org/wiki/
> ApacheJSPWikiProposal, sho
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
> these concerns are very valid and good and Janne has demonstrated that
> he is aware of this.
> However, most of the vetting required is actually *part* of the
> incubation process and happens after acceptance into the incubator.
> So can we just postpone that disc
In general, if there are any questions about IP and/or licensing, you can
check with the PMC, and we can go to the Legal Committee.
> Also, things like JavaMail libraries are highly useful for our user
> experience (e.g. sending email in case the user forgets his
> password). If there is an Apach
> We have all but one tracked down and all have already agreed.
> The question is whether they need to sign CLAs or whether it
> is just enough that they verbally in an email agree to the
> license change.
If they want to continue development, they must sign a CLA. If they just
want to grant lice
+1 for the overall proposal (binding)
On 8/29/07, Janne Jalkanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I am Janne Jalkanen, the lead developer of the open source wiki
> engine called JSPWiki, and I have a proposal for your enjoyment.
> This proposal is available in the web at http://www.jspw
+1 for incubation.
It's clear to me from the discussion here that the prospective
project is aware of most of the IP, licensing, and third party issues
that we deal with at Apache, and I welcome the opportunity to have
them continue work in Apache.
I'll even volunteer to help mentor if th
The proposal was posted Aug. 29, we're up to 4 or 5 binding +1 votes
now and no -1 vote have been cast.
Binding:
+1 Craig Russell
+1 Noel Bergman
+1 Nicolas Hedman
+1 Ted Husted
Other:
+1 Dave Johnson (retroactively binding?)
+1 Alexey Petrenko
+1 Martijn Dashorst
Are we ready to incubate?
- Da
I'd count "Snoop" Dave Johnson as a binding vote, being Incubator PMC.
Time's up. Go for't.
Craig
On Sep 11, 2007, at 7:41 PM, Dave wrote:
The proposal was posted Aug. 29, we're up to 4 or 5 binding +1 votes
now and no -1 vote have been cast.
Binding:
+1 Craig Russell
+1 Noel Bergman
+1 Nico
Huh, am I late?
+1 (mentoring JSPWiki... ;-) )
Best regards
Henning
On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 22:41 -0400, Dave wrote:
> The proposal was posted Aug. 29, we're up to 4 or 5 binding +1 votes
> now and no -1 vote have been cast.
>
> Binding:
> +1 Craig Russell
> +1 Noel Berg
Henning Schmiedehausen schrieb:
> Huh, am I late?
Me too ;-)
I thought this was just the disussion and the vote would start afterwards.
Anyway, as a long time JSPWiki user
+1
--
Christian
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
Have you approached Geronimo to see if they are interested, and would
participate? Are there other projects with which it aligns well?
Just looking for natural allies to help build your community. :-)
--- Noel
-
To u
On Saturday 15 September 2007 06:01, Shane Isbell wrote:
> - JSR-124 Specification:
> http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr124/
There has been some debate over Sun led JSRs in general. Is this particular
one to the ASF's satisfaction?
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
On 1/04/2003 22:03 Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator.
:-D
Nice one!
--
Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at
+1, I'm seriously considering doing an Ada port!
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 03:03 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator. I'd like for the Jakarta PMC/committers to vote a tacit
approval of the project before we wor
GREAT! Add yourself as a committer to the wiki page! I'm glad there is
so much community enthusiasm for this!
Ben Hyde wrote:
+1, I'm seriously considering doing an Ada port!
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 03:03 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMai
No way, not until the board clarifies project's reply-to header policy.
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 03:35 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
GREAT! Add yourself as a committer to the wiki page! I'm glad there
is so much community enthusiasm for this!
Ben Hyde wrote:
+1, I'm seriously considering
Ben,
You're being obstructionist. Lets not make this into a big political
thing. Its important that Apache have a mass mailing solution and its
great community project. We're even going to advance the state of
development through extensive use of UML, implement the CMM and utilize
the grand
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:14 am, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> Ben,
>
> You're being obstructionist. Lets not make this into a big political
> thing.
Andy, as usual, you're making mountains out of molehills. There IS broad
agreement - let's just go forward with this.
Conor
-
Andy, as usual, you're making mountains out of molehills. There IS broad
agreement - let's just go forward with this.
Excellent! I'm glad we've reached a consensus!
-Andy
Conor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/04/2003 11:17:05 AM:
> >
> >
> >
> >Andy, as usual, you're making mountains out of molehills. There IS
broad
> >agreement - let's just go forward with this.
> >
> >
> Excellent! I'm glad we've reached a consensus!
Now that we've reached conse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When will you guys ever get a clue?
I must say that this entire thread made my day. It is *nice* to see
this group of people collaborating.
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For add
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:12 pm, Sam Ruby wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > When will you guys ever get a clue?
>
> I must say that this entire thread made my day. It is *nice* to see
> this group of people collaborating.
>
We just need to get the infrastructure guys on board.
Conor
--
Now that we've reached consensus, the Maven team has written a SuperXMaver
plugin, by taking all the best ideas, I mean forking the source code, and
refuses to let anyone else commit to the new SuperXMaver features.
Dion I'm glad to see maven covering the important feature of mail
harvestin
We just need to get the infrastructure guys on board.
I'll prepare a notification and pre-prepare a "its been 3 months and no
movement has happened" flame ... ;-)
-Andy
Conor
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Hi All,
I'm pleased to finally propose the SuperXMailer for Jakarta via the
incubator. I'd like for the Jakarta PMC/committers to vote a tacit
approval of the project before we work on acceptance into the
incubator. I'm sure that despite the inevitable controversy, f
ril 01, 2003 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [Proposal] SuperXMailer
> Ben,
>
> You're being obstructionist. Lets not make this into a big political
> thing. Its important that Apache have a mass mailing solution and its
> great community project. We're even going to advance th
(copying the other lists, by request)
Thanks for all the good questions and advice, Howard. Please let me know
if the following leaves you with other questions or concerns.
On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:26 PM, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
>> See [http://workshop.bea.com/xmlbeans/quickStart.jsp B
On Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:02 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 02, 2003 7:26 PM, Howard M. Lewis Ship wrote:
>> Do you have a roadmap of where you would like this project to be in 6
>> months? A year? Two years?
>
> Yes - and I will post it shortly on the Wiki site.
I've just p
On May 17, 2004, at 3:21 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Incubator PMC folks,
I would like to propose a new Apache project named Beehive.
The proposal can be found at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeehiveProposal.
Since the project is being proposed as a TLP with three subprojects,
I've requested th
+1 from me. (willing to help)
-- dims
On Mon, 17 May 2004 05:39:30 -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 17, 2004, at 3:21 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
>
> > Incubator PMC folks,
> >
> > I would like to propose a new Apache project named Beehive.
> > The proposal can be
On 17 May 2004, at 09:21, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
I would like to propose a new Apache project named Beehive.
The proposal can be found at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeehiveProposal.
A very well written proposal: enthusiastic +1
Since the project is being proposed as a TLP with three subprojec
On May 17, 2004, at 3:21 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Incubator PMC folks,
I would like to propose a new Apache project named Beehive.
The proposal can be found at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeehiveProposal.
Since the project is being proposed as a TLP with three subprojects,
I've requested th
+1
Roy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I would like to propose a new Apache project named Beehive.
LOL I think you just did. :-) [Sorry, I use the same turn of phrase. I
still find it amusing. :-)]
The proposal can be found at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeehiveProposal.
Looks good. One question is if you would consider u
Noel J. Bergman wrote on Monday, May 17, 2004 6:10 PM:
>> I would like to propose a new Apache project named Beehive.
>
> LOL I think you just did. :-) [Sorry, I use the same turn of
> phrase. I still find it amusing. :-)]
got me! -- I usually catch myself before doing that. I think
next t
+1
Ted
On May 17, 2004, at 12:21 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Incubator PMC folks,
I would like to propose a new Apache project named Beehive.
The proposal can be found at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeehiveProposal.
Since the project is being proposed as a TLP with three subprojects,
I've requ
+1,
Nemi
--- Cliff Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Incubator PMC folks,
>
> I would like to propose a new Apache project named
> Beehive.
> The proposal can be found at
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeehiveProposal.
>
> Since the project is being proposed as a TLP with
> three subprojec
+1 - with some reservations/questions.
1. I tried to find it, but I couldn't find a definitive answer to
Noel's question RE mailing lists? (I'd note that it is very easy to add
more mailing lists and split things out at any point - hint hint :>)
2. We seem to be adding a *lot* of initial comm
Berin Lautenbach wrote on Thursday, May 20, 2004 4:16 AM:
> +1 - with some reservations/questions.
>
> 1. I tried to find it, but I couldn't find a definitive answer to
> Noel's question RE mailing lists? (I'd note that it is very easy to
> add more mailing lists and split things out at any poi
I would like to get personally involved in this project. I'll add
myself to the ppmc and dev lists when they are created, but whether
or not I am listed as an initial committer I'll leave up to the
folks proposing the project [OTOH, if I am, that will pretty much
obligate me to stay involved, at l
+1
-dain
On May 17, 2004, at 2:21 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Incubator PMC folks,
I would like to propose a new Apache project named Beehive.
The proposal can be found at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeehiveProposal.
Since the project is being proposed as a TLP with three subprojects,
I've req
Oh, it will be CVS for now, I believe, as our most-beloved programming
tools don't have subversion support integrated until now.
Conversion to subversion is delayed ;)
Apart from that, we are all set, I believe..
best regards,
Martin
---
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:16:59 +0200, Martin Marinschek wrote:
> Oh, it will be CVS for now, I believe, as our most-beloved
> programming tools don't have subversion support integrated until
> now.
Which tools would those be? There are SVN plugins for both IDEA
(http://svnup.tigris.org) and Eclipse
Ted Husted wrote:
Which tools would those be? There are SVN plugins for both IDEA (http://svnup.tigris.org) and Eclipse (http://subclipse.tigris.org).
Please keep in mind, that these tools are *far* away from their CVS
counterparts maturity and rich feature set. For example, in the case of
Eclips
>
> Is there anything else that anyone would like to discuss regarding the
> MyFaces proposal
> (http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/MyFacesProposal) before
> we vote on acceptance?
>
Is there any relationship between MyFaces and
https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/?
If not (and I presume that t
This is Sun's official Reference Implementation. The latest binary is distributed
under a restricted "internal use" license and can't be redistributed in any form. The
CVS source code is distributed under the Java Research License and is not available to
the general public.
-Ted.
On Tue, 06 Ju
I thought Sun announced they are open sourcing this (at Java One). I don't
know what the timeframe (or licence) for the open source version is, though.
>
>
> This is Sun's official Reference Implementation. The latest
> binary is distributed under a restricted "internal use"
> license and can
: Monday, July 05, 2004 7:35 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Proposal] MyFaces
I thought Sun announced they are open sourcing this (at Java One). I don't
know what the timeframe (or licence) for the open source version is, though.
>
>
> This is Sun's offi
Just a short update - the source-code of MyFaces is now completely under
the Apache License, Version 2.0 - I will update the proposal according
to this fact.
And this is probably also the difference to the Sun RI ;)
Best regards,
Martin
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Is there anything else that anyone
In fact, IntelliJ IDEA - I have read a thread in the IDEA forum about
svnup several days ago, and the conclusion was that it is not yet very
mature and the subversion support is a constant top request of IntelliJ
users in the feature request...
However, CVS support in this IDE is just great!
Ha
What do you think, would it be time to start off the vote? I think the
proposal correctly represents what the MyFaces developer want to achieve
with the project, the vote about the grant is settled on the MyFaces
develop list, and the license has successfully been changed - I think
the remainin
Martin,
When you get a chance, would you please take the Wiki page content and
prepare it as a record of the project proposal for the MyFaces web site?
Shouldn't take more than a few minutes.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe,
James Holmes wrote:
It has been "open sourced". That's what the sun research license is.
However, it is not very "open".
The precise wording of the announcement talked about putting the RI of
JavaServer Faces under "open development", but not claiming to be "open
source" until the license was
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Martin,
When you get a chance, would you please take the Wiki page content and
prepare it as a record of the project proposal for the MyFaces web site?
Shouldn't take more than a few minutes.
--- Noel
---
what if I just copy the proposal and attach it to this mail, and what
people voted about was this version?
That should be open - as anybody can read the mailing list archive and
rather static, as nobody will be able to change the content of my e-mail.
Best regards,
Martin
*Proposal for new proj
> what if I just copy the proposal and attach it to this mail, and what
> people voted about was this version?
Thank you for doing that. [He said, wondering why no one, including self,
had thought to the obvious earlier. :-)]
--- Noel
---
+1
-dain
--
Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect
Gluecode Software
310.536.8355, ext. 26
On Dec 20, 2004, at 4:58 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
I propose that the Nutch project be adopted by Apache.
The full proposal is at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NutchProposal
Please tell me if you have any questi
Doug Cutting wrote:
I propose that the Nutch project be adopted by Apache.
The full proposal is at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NutchProposal
Please tell me if you have any questions about this proposal.
Wow! :-)
Personally I find it the most interesting and promising Incubator
proposal in
+1 from me too, of course :)
The search.apache.org proposal is forthcoming. I've drafted it at:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/TopLevelProposal
I'll propose this to the Jakarta PMC in a day or so after we have a
chance for others to comment.
The link between Nutch and search.apach
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 09:42, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Doug Cutting wrote:
> > I propose that the Nutch project be adopted by Apache.
> >
> > The full proposal is at:
> >
> >http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NutchProposal
> >
> > Please tell me if you have any questions about this proposal.
On Dec 21, 2004, at 4:06 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Yep. However, the Apache 4.0 License ( in (1) scope of the subprojects
)
disturbs me. :-)
Corrected!
Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
One thing... there need not be a single Mentor. I would propose that
you, being already an Apache committer, be a Mentor as well.
Okay. I added myself as a Mentor.
+1
What's the timeline for a decision about Nutch entering the incubator?
Ideally I'd like to move things
Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
Doug Cutting wrote:
I propose that the Nutch project be adopted by Apache.
The full proposal is at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NutchProposal
+1
What's the status of this proposal? Do I need to call a vote?
I have a Forrest-based website ready and would like to st
I presume this codebase is substantial enough that it requires
incubation? Or because it was a single developer, could he contribute
it directly to the Lucene project and bypass incubation?
Erik
On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project
Erik Hatcher wrote:
I presume this codebase is substantial enough that it requires
incubation? Or because it was a single developer, could he contribute
it directly to the Lucene project and bypass incubation?
It's currently about 6500 lines of C code. I'm not sure what the cutoff
point is (or
I'd love to see this happen, and bringing it into the Lucene Project
proper seems to make sense, from a Lucene outsider.
-Brian
On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:35 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project for incubation.
Lucene4c is a port of the Lucene search engine from Java to C
All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if only to
do the required IP checklist.
On Feb 14, 2005, at 8:59 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
I presume this codebase is substantial enough that it requires
incubation? Or because it was a single developer, could he contribute
it directly
On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if only
to
do the required IP checklist.
Right.
By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene project? The
Lucene PMC could bring the codebase into their project and regist
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if only to
do the required IP checklist.
Right.
By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene project? The
Lucene PMC could bring the codebase into
On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:41 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if
only to
do the required IP checklist.
Right.
By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene pro
Garrett Rooney wrote:
I'd like to propose the Lucene4c project for incubation.
+1. I would love to see Lucene4c take off, and making it part of Lucene
would be a great boost to it.
-Paul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Feb 14, 2005, at 12:36 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if only
to
do the required IP checklist.
Right.
By my question is why doesn't this go through the Lucene project? The
Lucene P
Garrett,
You're right that all new code bases should come through the Incubator.
However, the appropriate PMC to vote on whether it should be accepted
into the incubator is the sponsoring PMC, which in this case appears to
be the Lucene PMC. (The Incubator PMC does sponsor some projects,
usually
Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Garrett,
You're right that all new code bases should come through the Incubator.
However, the appropriate PMC to vote on whether it should be accepted
into the incubator is the sponsoring PMC, which in this case appears to
be the Lucene PMC. (The Incubator PMC does sponsor som
Erik Hatcher wrote:
> > On Feb 14, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> All donated code should really go through the Incubator, even if only
>>> to do the required IP checklist.
> I'm not sure what is meant by "register the IP stuff here".
I'm in an airplane, and can't check the URL, but
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'd gladly bring the codebase into Lucene's repository if that is the
consensus. It was created entirely by Garrett and he's agreed to
donate it, so the IP should be pretty clear cut.
Do you have a community for it, or just a place? If this isn't something
that the Lucene
On Feb 17, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
It seems that the best course of action is for the Lucene PMC to vote
whether they want to accept the project for incubation (which they are
currently doing), then bring the project into the incubator and try to
build up a more sustainable comm
The Lucene PMC has unanimously voted to accept the Lucene4c codebase.
Let's bring it into incubation!
What's next?
Erik
On Feb 17, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 17, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
It seems that the best course of action is for the Lucene PMC to vot
Erik Hatcher wrote:
The Lucene PMC has unanimously voted to accept the Lucene4c codebase.
Let's bring it into incubation!
What's next?
I figure this probably fell off most people's radar over the weekend,
but just so there's something sitting in the top of the inbox, ping?
From a "getting the pr
On Feb 21, 2005, at 5:46 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
The Lucene PMC has unanimously voted to accept the Lucene4c codebase.
Let's bring it into incubation!
What's next?
I figure this probably fell off most people's radar over the weekend,
but just so there's something sitting in
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Getting the Forrest website going would be a good step to tackle. See
the Incubator site for some details, as well as cloning how Nutch is set
up:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nutch.html
Well, I don't think I have the karma to commit to the incubator section
of
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Getting the Forrest website going would be a good step to tackle. See
the Incubator site for some details, as well as cloning how Nutch is
set up:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nutch.html
Well, I don't think I have the karma to commit to the
If there are things that I can do to give Garrett karma or update the
website, let me know. I'm not quite sure how I fit in and what powers
I have to push things without assistance.
Thanks,
Erik
On Feb 24, 2005, at 7:21 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Oh, i hate to see stuff go unanswered - i don't know the procedure either
but will try my best. With the outcome of this we should create a
very simple Guidelines document to show the steps.
Erik Hatcher wrote:
> If there are things that I can do to give Garrett karma or update the
> website, let
David Crossley wrote:
Oh, i hate to see stuff go unanswered - i don't know the procedure either
but will try my best. With the outcome of this we should create a
very simple Guidelines document to show the steps.
Erik Hatcher wrote:
If there are things that I can do to give Garrett karma or update
Garrett Rooney wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> >2) Add the status page and update website:
> >http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html#Updating+the+site
> >As a mentor, Erik, you should be able to add it. If someone can clarify
> >the acceptance then i will add it.
Okay, i have done that
David Crossley wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
2) Add the status page and update website:
http://incubator.apache.org/howtoparticipate.html#Updating+the+site
As a mentor, Erik, you should be able to add it. If someone can clarify
the acceptance then i will add it.
Okay, i have d
So how does this work? Does the incubator also need to vote on this
or is it accepted for incubation based on the Lucene PMC vote?
I'm +1, for the record :)
Erik
On Jan 3, 2006, at 10:19 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Hello Incubator PMC folks,
I would like to propose a new Apache proje
501 - 600 of 4595 matches
Mail list logo
