The procedure would be identical to the OpenOffice donation from Oracle to
Apache. Oracle would have to sign a software grant to Apache and
contributors would have to iCLAs. Apache requires copyright owners to vouch
they are the original authors and have given permission for their IP to be
+1
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Gerhard Petracek gpetra...@apache.org
wrote:
+1
regards,
gerhard
2014-11-13 9:16 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
+1 (binding)
LieGrue,
strub
On Tuesday, 11 November 2014, 12:20, John D. Ament
john.d.am...@gmail.com
I'm happy to champion and endorse for inclusion in the Incubator as long as
the foremost focus is creating a functioning, lasting and healthy ASF
community and any JSR/JCP points always second.
I do not think these goals are mutually exclusive, in fact I think the
opposite; the world could
)
- Mark Struberg (individual, ASF member)
- Gerhard Petracek (individual, ASF member)
- David Blevins (individual, ASF member)
- Sagara Gunathunga (ASF)
Alignment
Several Apache project will need a JSR-353 implementation. Having a project
which can be shared is better than having
+1!
-David
On Aug 20, 2012, at 6:47 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi Folks!
The deltaspike-0.3-incubating vote has internally passed with lots of +1.
We have 2 IPMC +1 so far and like to ask for a tough review from fellow IPMCs.
[+1] all fine, ship it
[+0] I don't care but smells fine
+1 (binding)
-David
On Apr 18, 2012, at 10:09 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi IPMC folks!
I'd like to call the 2nd round (IPMC review/vote) for our
DeltaSpike-0.2-incubating release!
See the attached thread for the release artifacts and the podling VOTE
results.
We have 14 +1
are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Creadur Project:
* Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
* Brian E Fox bri...@apache.org
* David Crossley cross...@apache.org
* David Blevins dblev...@apache.org
* Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org
* Gavin McDonald gmcdon
(Independent contributor)
* Cody Lerum (Independent contributor)
* Antoine Sabot-Durand (Independent contributor)
* Pete Royle (Independent contributor)
* Mark Struberg (individual, ASF member)
* Gerhard Petracek (individual, ASF member)
* David Blevins (individual, ASF
Looks very interesting!
+1 (non-binding)
-David
On Sep 13, 2011, at 12:18 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello Folks,
Please vote on the acceptance of Kalumet into the Apache incubator.
The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KalumetProposal
(for your convenience, a
:
* David Blevins ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Alan Cabrera([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* David Jencks([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Jacek Laskowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Brett Porter([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* Dain Sundstrom ([EMAIL PROTECTED
On May 3, 2007, at 3:16 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
+1
However, IFF (if and only if, for those not posessing a math or
logic
background), it isn't too much trouble, could you recast it in the
form of
the revised template?
Mind you, that's really an issue for the Board, so it doesn't
On May 2, 2007, at 3:23 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Here's the revised language:
RESOLVED, that The Apache OpenEJB Project be and hereby is
responsible for the creation and maintenance of a software
project related to enterprise application
Noel, we definitely understand we don't have an exclusive lock on
any ASF land; we understand perfectly that's not how the ASF works :)
-David
On May 1, 2007, at 12:47 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
We could use Scalable
On May 1, 2007, at 1:27 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
we definitely understand we don't have an exclusive lock on
any ASF land; we understand perfectly that's not how the ASF works :)
:-)
As I allowed earlier, the discourse devolved a bit into a
bikeshed. :-) I
look forward to the revised
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
We could use Scalable, transactional, and multi-user
secure architecture for the development and deployment
of component-based business applications
How would that differ from River or WS (various WS-* specs cover
transactions and security
On Apr 30, 2007, at 4:57 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
Couldn't that be in EJB and related technologies ??
Certainly implementing the EJB spec is a constant for the project,
so that description would be adequate. It does give me an ick
feeling though as it's very
On Apr 27, 2007, at 3:19 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:40 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 4/25/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 24/04/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the creation
On Apr 27, 2007, at 12:40 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On 4/25/07, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 24/04/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the creation and maintenance of open-source software related
Haven't seen any more discussion, so just following up. Noel, were
your questions answered to your liking? Niclas?
-David
On Apr 24, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Brett,
What is the diversity of the Committer list and the PMC?
the creation and maintenance of open-source
On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:46 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 24/04/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the creation and maintenance of open-source software related to
enterprise application and remoting services, for distribution at
no charge to the public.
A bit generic for a project
On Apr 24, 2007, at 7:41 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 08:31, David Blevins wrote:
Generally, I think it's good to use words that describe EJB then the
words Enterprise JavaBeans specifically. Primarily because I think
it's good to be able to innovate in the space
+1
-David
On Jan 9, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
On Jan 9, 2007, at 8:21 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 1/9/07, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) The Board meeting is on the 17th, so this will likely be too late
to add to this month's agenda. (You can see if we're
On Aug 18, 2006, at 8:49 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 18 Aug 06, at 11:30 AM 18 Aug 06, Dan Diephouse wrote:
Yeah, I find this a bit confusing too. The ibiblio repository
distribution policy is unrelated to Apache's. No one is making any
claims on ibiblio about the licensing (other than
A big +1. And I also really like the idea that the proposals contain
the version number they were written against.
-David
On Aug 8, 2006, at 6:34 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote:
On 8/8/06, Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps we should try and seperate this somewhat more rigidly. Eg we
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-24?page=comments#action_12421489
]
David Blevins commented on INCUBATOR-24:
don't have the perms to reopen it
Setup OpenEJB mailing lists
On Jul 13, 2006, at 10:49 PM, Ted Leung wrote:
On Jul 13, 2006, at 7:16 PM, David Blevins wrote:
In the ASF we do have PMC Chairs, period.
Now let's say, someone wins this debate on wether or not having a
PMC Chair from inside or outside the project is more or less
likely to result
Sorry, I can't resist...
On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:14 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
ASF Members are automatically
eligible for PMC membership; non-Members may be elected at the
discretion of
the Incubator PMC.
with-big-grin
This is some of that non-hierarchical, peer-based stuff you were
On Jul 13, 2006, at 5:49 PM, Ted Leung wrote:
On Jul 13, 2006, at 5:41 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
How hard is it to understand that the PMC Chair has no role (slight
hyperbole)? If the PMC Chair is a visible role, the community is
already in
trouble. The only role that a PMC Chair
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-23?page=comments#action_12420223
]
David Blevins commented on INCUBATOR-23:
thanks -- we'll have to get someone with sufficient privileges to close it.
OpenEJB status page
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-24?page=comments#action_12420224
]
David Blevins commented on INCUBATOR-24:
thanks -- we'll have to get someone with sufficient privileges to close it.
Setup OpenEJB mailing lists
On Jul 11, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
IRC can be used by a podling to bring new people up to speed (e.g.
QA between available committers and interested users/contributors),
although such sessions should be archived and made available to those
not able to attend. However, using IRC
OpenEJB status page
---
Key: INCUBATOR-23
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-23
Project: Incubator
Type: Task
Components: site
Reporter: David Blevins
Status page for OpenEJB
--
This message is automatically generated
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-23?page=all ]
David Blevins updated INCUBATOR-23:
---
Attachment: openejb.patch
OpenEJB status page
---
Key: INCUBATOR-23
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Setup OpenEJB mailing lists
---
Key: INCUBATOR-24
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-24
Project: Incubator
Type: Task
Reporter: David Blevins
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
] wrote:
would be another possibility.
but any objections when using the MyFaces continuum for ADF /
Trinidad ?
Is is easy to manage, since MyFaces, MyFaces Tomahawk and MyFaces
Tobago use it already for ci.
Regards,
Matthias
On 6/19/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cc'ing infra
Cc'ing infra@
I'd volunteer to setup/maintain a ASF-wide continuum install if we
wanted one.
-David
On Jun 19, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Hey,
we'd like to add a nightly build support to the ADF Faces (aka
Trinidad) donation.
Since we are using Maven2 the continuum
+1
-David
On Mar 19, 2006, at 5:33 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What follows is the official proposal for OpenJPA. The unofficial
version can be found here
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenJPAProposal
Please vote on acceptance of this proposal. The vote will run 1
week until
If you ask me what my opinion on OpenEJB's future or James' opinion
on ActiveMQ's future, we'll both probably tell you TLP is a good goal
eventually.
We've more or less been running as TLPs in relation to Geronimo for
the past two plus years already, just at Codehaus. We've seen how
On Feb 14, 2006, at 7:35 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David,
The mentors should have karma to setup the status file. At least
one of
them has karma to the SVN access control lists. Do we have all of
the CLAs
and a Software Grant?
Noel or anyone,
Ismael needs to do a Software Grant (i
On Feb 14, 2006, at 7:35 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David,
The mentors should have karma to setup the status file. At least
one of
them has karma to the SVN access control lists. Do we have all of
the CLAs
and a Software Grant?
Ok. I made nearly all the OpenEJB committers sign CLAs
On Feb 4, 2006, at 9:42 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Friday 03 February 2006 03:50, David Blevins wrote:
OpenEJB has been proposed as a subproject of Geronimo. See the
proposal here:
I think this is a good idea.
However, I would like to hear why OpenEJB was not part of Geronimo's
Should have sent this email a much earlier as we voted quite some
time ago. Anyway,
OpenEJB has been proposed as a subproject of Geronimo. See the
proposal here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
The Geronimo project has voted to be the sponsor of the OpenEJB.
The
On Feb 2, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Blevins wrote:
As you know, this is a project that I would like to see moving into
the ASF,
and Geronimo (in this case) is actually where it does belong, but ...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenEjbProposal
Would you PLEASE
[X] Graduate the Directory Project
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:09:13AM +0200, Stephen McConnell wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry but Nicola Ken is not qualified. I'm sorry Nicola but
you instigated this and only you can fix it.
Stephen, saying that someone is not
+1
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 10:57:39PM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
The Geronimo project has been in Incubation for almost 10 months. In
those 10 months, the Geronimo project has developed a community,
developed a new codebase in an open and collaborative fashion,
weathered problems
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 04:48:23PM -0400, Alex Karasulu wrote:
I was also thinking of approaching JetBrains for IDEA licenses for our
group as well.
Boy would I love an IDEA license.
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
47 matches
Mail list logo
