Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Pinot as TLP

n the scope of > responsibility of the Apache Pinot Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Pinot Project: > >- > >Felix Cheung mailto:felixche...@apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

he Apache Pinot Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Pinot Project: > Felix Cheung mailto:felixche...@apache.org>> > Jackie Jiang mailto:jac...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

I propose that we run the vote anyway, thus ensuring IPMC oversight and (post)approval, and then update the release runbook to make sure this doesn't happen again. Make sense? > On Mar 17, 2021, at 11:35 PM, Felix Cheung wrote: > > It is unclear the guidance on this but since it is impossible

Re: Where to get feedback on a project before formulating a proposal

Daniel, you may also wish to check out Apache Petri: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/PETRI/Apache+Petri > On Nov 24, 2020, at 7:39 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > > > >> On 24 Nov 2020, at 04:15, Daniel Widdis wrote: >> >> I manage a mature open source project (as the “benevolent

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.38.0

+1 (binding) - carried over from PPMC vote > On Nov 9, 2020, at 2:11 PM, daniel gaspar wrote: > > Hello IPMC, > > The Apache Superset (incubating) community has voted on and approved a > proposal to > release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.38.0. > The voting thread can be found here: >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a Top Level Project

sponsibility for management of the> > projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Superset> > Project; and be it further> > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are> > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Ap

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.1

+1 (binding) > On Sep 9, 2020, at 11:37 AM, Ville Brofeldt > wrote: > > Hello IPMC, > > The Apache Superset (incubating) community has voted on and approved a > proposal to > release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.1. > The voting thread can be found here: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.5.0 RC2

+1 (binding) > On Sep 8, 2020, at 1:50 PM, Jialiang Li wrote: > > +1 > > On 2020/09/04 19:06:15, Ting Chen wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pinot (incubating) version >> 0.5.0. >> >> Apache Pinot (incubating) is a distributed columnar storage engine that

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.5.0 RC1 (Please ignore the earlier email sent under non apache Email)

+1 (binding) > On Aug 31, 2020, at 8:54 PM, Ting Chen wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pinot (incubating) version > 0.5.0. > > Apache Pinot (incubating) is a distributed columnar storage engine that can > ingest data in realtime and serve analytical queries

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.4.0 RC2

+1 (binding) > On Jun 9, 2020, at 12:20 AM, H wrote: > > This is a call for vote to the release Apache Pinot (incubating) version > 0.4.0 > > Apache Pinot (incubating) is a distributed columnar storage engine that can > ingest data in realtime and serve analytical queries at low latency. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BlueMarlin in the incubator

+1 (binding) > On May 29, 2020, at 1:06 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > Casting my own +1 (binding) > > Gently reminder for the other IPMC. > > Thanks ! > Regards > JB > >> Le 25 mai 2020 à 08:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Following the discussion about

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Hudi (Incubating) as a TLP

+1 (binding) > On May 18, 2020, at 10:20 AM, Justin Mclean > wrote: > > Hi, > >> I really feel that casting a -1 vote, with the vague justification provided >> below, really is not sufficient. > > Details have been provided on their private list I suggest you look there, > the issues has

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Hudi (Incubating) as a TLP

I really feel that casting a -1 vote, with the vague justification provided below, really is not sufficient. Please provide either details in this thread what exactly about the proposed PMC membership you are opposed to or links to whatever thread you raised these concerns. > On May 16, 2020,

Re: [MENTORS] Sign-off due on teh 12th May

Pinot would like to request reporting next month and then back on schedule. > On May 8, 2020, at 8:53 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Current sign off status of podling reports. Good to see Tuweni has 100% sign > off from all it mentors. > > Pinot - MISSING

[RESULT][VOTE] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph Extension

With 6 binding +1 votes, and no -1, I call this vote CLOSED and the vote has PASSED. Thank you all. FTR: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-181 was created to handle the naming/branding issue that came up during the discussion and voting. - To

Re: [VOTE] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph Extension

We have rec'd more than the required 3 +1 votes, but I will keep the polls open through the weekend to ensure people have had sufficient time to check the proposal and address/mention any concerns. Stay safe! Cheers! > On Apr 15, 2020, at 11:12 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > We w

Re: [VOTE] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph Extension

+1 (binding) > On Apr 15, 2020, at 11:12 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > We would like to propose AgensGraph Extension as an Apache incubator project. > As such, I am calling a VOTE. > > The AgensGraph Extension provides an extension for PostgreSQL to give the > users th

[VOTE] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph Extension

We would like to propose AgensGraph Extension as an Apache incubator project. As such, I am calling a VOTE. The AgensGraph Extension provides an extension for PostgreSQL to give the users the ability to leverage graph database on top of the existing relational database with minimal effort. The

Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph

The naming was not the focusing upon part which I was referring to... sorry if that was not obvious based on what I quoted and what I wrote. > On Apr 15, 2020, at 8:29 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > HI, > >> I just wanted to ensure that this particular podling proposal was not being >> unduly

Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph

> On Apr 14, 2020, at 4:27 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >> >> Certainly this is a concern of all incoming podlings though, isn't it? Isn't >> the goal of Incubator to ensure, as much as possible, that the podling DOES >> develop into a community? So why the overdue concern, if overdue is

Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph

> On Apr 15, 2020, at 5:28 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 2:30 AM David Nalley wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 5:55 PM Justin Mclean >> wrote: >>> ...I’d suggest that if this is a know issue, that a different name be >>> selected before entering

Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph

> On Apr 14, 2020, at 1:37 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > > I’m also concerned about the experience level of the mentors and we have not > heard from any of them on this thread. > You must have missed:

Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph

I can make a specific request. What qualifications would you accept as reasonable to alleviate your concern? > > Regards, > Dave Stay safe! Cheers. > >> On Apr 14, 2020, at 5:12 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> Thanks for all the feedback and comment

Re: [DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph

Thanks for all the feedback and comments... I will assume that calling for a VOTE is OK at this point and will do so. > On Apr 8, 2020, at 9:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > We would like to propose AgensGraph as an Apache incubator project. > > The AgensGraph Extension provid

[DISCUSS] Project proposal - Apache AgensGraph

We would like to propose AgensGraph as an Apache incubator project. The AgensGraph Extension provides an extension for PostgreSQL to give the users the ability to leverage graph database on top of the existing relational database with minimal effort. The basic principle of the project is to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.10.0-incubating

+1 (binding) > On Dec 6, 2019, at 5:41 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Hi all, > The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Apache > Tuweni 0.10.0-incubating. > > Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and we would now > like to request the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.9.0-incubating

+1 (binding) - carried over from podling release vote > On Oct 5, 2019, at 11:08 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Hi all, > The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Apache > Tuweni 0.9.0-incubating. > > Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy and we

Re: [MENTORS] Mentor guidance document

First of all, thx for putting this together and thx for starting up a discussion/effort in the Incubator about how to improve the Incubator instead of just deciding that it is broken and needs to be replaced and/or alternatives found (although both of those PoVs have merit). Let me spend some

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Pulsar - Pulsar Manager

+1 > On Sep 11, 2019, at 3:47 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > > Hi all, > > Apache Pulsar received a donation which adds a new web UI - Pulsar Manager > to Pulsar. Pulsar Manager is a web-based GUI management and monitoring tool > that helps > administrators and users manage and monitor tenants,

Re: [MENTORS] Mentor guidance document

Ross said everything that I would have said... only better. > On Aug 18, 2019, at 5:35 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: > > Only replying because I'm called out explicitly. > > Documentation does not solve the problem. If someone doesn't already "get" > this stuff then they should not be mentoring.

Re: [MENTORS] Mentor guidance document

I'll reply/respond asap. > On Aug 17, 2019, at 9:26 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > I've had hoped I'd get more of a response to the mentor guidance > documentation I suggested. Perhaps it got lost in the other noise? > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.34.0 [RC1]

+1 (binding) > On Aug 19, 2019, at 12:41 AM, Maxime Beauchemin > wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > The Apache Superset community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release > Apache Superset (incubating) 0.34.0 (rc1). *This would be the first Apache > release of Superset.* > > We now kindly

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

FTR: I think the biggest risk to the foundation are not these procedural aspects, like releases, but the gradual but inexorable decline in our culture and our principles. That is, or at least should be, the bigger concern. And I think the Incubator should take that risk much more seriously and

Re: Showcase your project at ApacheCON at a Podling's Shark Tank

"but for now: SIMPLY REPLY TO THIS EMAIL if you're interested. " :) > On Aug 15, 2019, at 8:44 AM, Josh Fischer wrote: > > I tried to click on both links. Both showed up as a Page Not Found > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 3:45 PM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> Hi Podlings! >> >> in less than a

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

> On Aug 14, 2019, at 1:24 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > >>> >>> Q: Does the IPMC want to produce non-ASF releases? > > My answer is yes! I want podlings to be on a path towards graduation! I > recognize multiple requirements. The path may differ for each podling. I’m > the end there are two

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

Fisher wrote: > > > >> On Aug 12, 2019, at 9:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Aug 12, 2019, at 10:44 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:20 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>>> ...

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

> On Aug 12, 2019, at 10:44 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:20 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> ... >> This does NOT mean that the IPMC should be gatekeepers though... Just as >> PMC chairs are the "eyes and ears of the board", mento

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

We have always had a mindset that we (the foundation) want to make it as "brain dead easy" for people to download, use, and consume ASF projects. This means that they don't need to worry about compliance, IP provenance, etc. Incubator releases are a special case. The expectation is, and should

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.1

+1 (binding) > On Jul 18, 2019, at 2:28 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Hi all, > The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Tuweni > 0.8.1. > > This release includes the following changes: > * Exclude gradle wrapper jar from source distribution > * Remove binary jar

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] the Incubator as a service provider for podlings (was: overzealous bureaucracy...)

Agreed. I think some of the conversation on that thread was likely polarizing and heated and my hope is that it isn't continued in this thread (whether it was self-justified as being "ham-handed" or not). > On Jul 18, 2019, at 4:12 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > Hi, > > As discussed

Re: New disclaimer text

> > Perhaps > DISCLAIMER-b.txt > DISCLAIMER-x.txt > might avoid this implication? > > David Jencks > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jul 15, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Jul 13, 2019, at 9:49 PM, Craig Russell

Re: New disclaimer text

> On Jul 13, 2019, at 9:49 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > DISCLAIMER.txt for the current standard disclaimer and some other name for > the new disclaimer. > This seems less confusing, I think. DISCLAIMERv2.txt for the other?

Re: New disclaimer text

This is a great idea... +1 > On Jul 12, 2019, at 6:31 PM, Craig Russell wrote: > > Hi, > > I understand I'm a bit late to this particular discussion, but perhaps we can > consider two different disclaimers that podlings can choose: > > The standard disclaimer that does not disclaim licensing

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

w00t! > On Jul 9, 2019, at 11:59 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > The Apache Tuweni team is proud to announce the release of Apache Tuweni > (incubating) 0.8.0. > > Apache Tuweni is a set of libraries and other tools to aid development of > blockchain and other decentralized software in Java and

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

> On Jul 3, 2019, at 5:06 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> >> 1. Podlings, and PPMC members, to enjoy the legal protection of the >> foundation when they do a release > > Let's be pedantic and define those in this particular case, shall we? > What exactly are the expectations for PPMC

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

> On Jul 3, 2019, at 2:37 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > > This is correct. Provided we *do* explicitly acknowledge that special > status of the Incubator. > > This acknowledgement will basically put podling source code releases > at the same level we have convenience binary releases. Which

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

> On Jul 3, 2019, at 1:01 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> Jim said "Let's also recall that the origin genesis of the Incubator was NOT >> to provide legal oversight, but rather education and guidance into The >> Apache Way” > > If you look at the history threads I posted the other

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

> On Jul 1, 2019, at 1:45 AM, Alex Harui wrote: > > FWIW, I reconcile it as: > > Incubator is a PMC and must record a business decision to call something an > ASF release in order to place that release under the legal protection of the > ASF. ASF releases may have policy non-compliance

Re: LGPL dependency

Myrle, did you get all you needed? Enough votes and all to get the release unblocked? > On Jun 28, 2019, at 11:24 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > > I've said it on dev@weex, and on private@incubator, but I wanted to make > sure and say it here too. Weex should cut the release. We'll figure out >

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

> On Jun 27, 2019, at 7:57 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> The Incubator itself is a PMC. > > OK that's sorted. > >> Now let's talk about podling releases... When the IPMC votes on accepting a >> podling release, and it passes, my opinion is that the Incubator takes on >> the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

+1 > On Jun 27, 2019, at 5:04 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > I’m not quite sure what to do. If I don’t hear by tomorrow I’ll close this > vote as passing. > >> On Jun 27, 2019, at 10:42 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:34 AM Justin Mclean >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

This speech policing is starting to get quite on my nerves. Especially when it ignores the intent behind such things... 99% of the time the smiley is there to say "Yeah, I know that sounds harsh, but it's a little joke". It is an attempt to replicate in text what is natural in "real life"...

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

> On Jun 25, 2019, at 9:49 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 6/24/19, 9:12 AM, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: > >> What kinds of policy violations truly affect the legal shield if the >> non-compliance: > >You're asking the wrong question. You're still asking the TLP question. > > I'm

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 0.8.0

+1 (binding) - carried over from PPMC vote > On Jun 24, 2019, at 6:03 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Hi all, > The Tuweni community voted on and has approved a proposal to release > Tuweni 0.8.0. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation > Policy and we would now like to request the

Re: Podlings, the Incubator, relationships and Apache

++1. I agree w/ Rich and Roman > On Jun 23, 2019, at 11:25 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 3:31 PM Rich Bowen > wrote: >> >> A couple of thoughts: > > And a couple of thoughts on top of that. > >> Podlings are not permitted to call

Re: [VOTE] Zipkin leave incubator, return back to OpenZipkin

+1 (binding) > On Jun 17, 2019, at 9:21 PM, Sheng Wu wrote: > > Hi > > This is a call for official vote of Zipkin leave from incubator, and return > back to OpenZipkin. > > PPMC have voted.[1], carried two IPMC +1 vote from Sheng Wu and Willem Jiang > > There is no trademark, logo transfer,

Re: overzealous bureaucracy (was: [VOTE] Zipkin leave incubator, return back to OpenZipkin)

My only comment here is that the Incubator performed a legal action in accepting Zipkin; in doing so, Zipkin enjoyed some level of ASF services as well as legal protection. To dissolve that 'relationship', there should be a clear trail of intent and action in doing so, not only by Zipkin but

Re: Incubation Pain Points

> On Jun 18, 2019, at 7:42 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 1:18 PM Jim Jagielski wrote: >> ...prepping the existing community regarding what "moving to the ASF means" >> is the job of the Champion, no?... > > I agre

Re: Incubation Pain Points

> On Jun 17, 2019, at 1:25 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi Roman, > > All very true. What the Incubator could do better is to let people know the > key values of The Apache Way that will impact any existing community if they > come to the ASF through the Incubator. While it will be a

Re: [IMPORTANT] Board proposal on podling releases

Agreed... isn't the whole point of the Incubator is to provide not only training and guidance but also a "safe place" where these codlings can learn the ropes, including How To Do A Release? And don't we stress that such podlings are under incubation is to ensure (as much as we can) that those

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

How about Apache Bistro: o sounds like crypto o Blockchain dISTRO o distributed kinda means decentralized as well. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

> > >> On Mar 19, 2019, at 11:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> Apache PawPaw >> >>> On Mar 19, 2019, at 9:58 AM, Michael Wall wrote: >>> >>> Since Cava is the Guava for blockchains, what about sticking with the >>> fru

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

ostcava which is the "the inferior vena cava of > vertebrates higher than fishes" according to > https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/postcava. But is seemed like a > name you could use after Cava. > > Just brainstorming. > > Mike > > > >

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

> On Mar 19, 2019, at 11:36 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > On 3/19/2019 8:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> What is somewhat funny is that the "SkyWalking" podling is on the cusp of >> graduation. :) > > I would say that's irreleva

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

; whether "Apache Obiwarn" is a Suitable Name >>>> >>>> Isn’t the name supposed to be Obiwan and not Obiwarn? >>> No, the name is Obiwarn. With a r. >> >> Well, my bad eye sight had my brain auto-correcting to what I expected to >> see. Then

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Thx. We'll wait for the decision. > On Mar 4, 2019, at 2:05 AM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > The ticket is now open: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-165 > > Cheers, > > Antoine > >> On Mar 1, 2019, at 3:24 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: >> >> Perfect, thank you. >> >>>

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

l in French. >>>> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bava >>>> >>>> StackOverflow: >>>> https://stackoverflow.com/search?q=bava >>>> 14 results because a user’s last name is Bava. >>>> >>>> LinkedIn: I found one compan

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

> On Feb 28, 2019, at 3:26 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > On 2/28/2019 3:24 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >>> >>> It also seems to imply that usage of the name rainbow would somehow >>> be offensive or insensitive. Again, I'm not sure how. Nor am I aware >>> of situations where the LGBT+

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

What about Bava? Blockchain Java and no offensive meanings that I can find. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

Hmm... in less than 20mins the request for Rainbow was shut down... I'm not sure how I feel about this... The justification seems a real stretch to me: https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/PODLINGNAMESEARCH/issues/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-164?filter=allissues It also seems to imply that usage

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

tage yet. I think we want to have > discussions about a provisional name first. Specifically, "A podling > needs to discover whether a name is suitable." > > Regards, > KAM > > On 2/28/2019 9:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> We should simply file a standard Jira r

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

We should simply file a standard Jira request for a podling namecheck. > On Feb 28, 2019, at 9:36 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > Not an objection per se but two comments: > > 1 - Rainbow is associated with LGBTQ communities and there have been > concerns about it being co-opted for other

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Feb 20, 2019, at 2:50 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2]. The > proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3]. > > We discussed how to go about finding a suitable name for the project in [2]. > I will

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search

Ah yes... agreed. > On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:33 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Jim, > > The potential conflict is a small San Francisco blockchain software comp[any > called kava.io <http://kava.io/>. > > Regards, > Dave > >> On Feb 19, 2019, at 5:50 A

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

PS: I'd also like to be added to the initial Contributor's list, if possible. > On Feb 19, 2019, at 8:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > +1 (binding) > >> On Feb 13, 2019, at 2:57 AM, Lars Francke wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> we've discussed t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) > On Feb 13, 2019, at 2:57 AM, Lars Francke wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > we've discussed the proposal for the Training project in [1] and [2]. The > proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3]. > > According to the Incubator rules[4] I'd like to call a vote to accept the > new

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search

t could mean "Cryptographic Java" >>> >>> Here are other suggestions, because I like have the block and/or in the >>> name :) >>> >>> - Blockava >>> - Blockva >>> - Chainava >>> >>> Please note I didn'

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

I see nothing wrong w/ Cava and see no need to change it, esp before incubation. > On Feb 18, 2019, at 11:40 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:52 PM Michael Wall wrote: > >> Interesting proposal. I would be interested in helping. Seems like you >> don't need anymore

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search

Consensus Java :) > On Feb 16, 2019, at 1:59 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > I explained it in the proposal and the original thread, Cava stands for > “ConsenSys Java”, after Guava. > > It’s not a bad name per se, so let’s add it to the proposals. > >> On Feb 16, 2019, at 9:58 AM, Henry

Re: Incubator exit interview

Isn't that starting off on the wrong foot? off list communication, non-transparancy, treating the VP of the PMC as "more" than an administrative position, etc... > On Dec 22, 2018, at 6:27 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: > > Another idea is for Justin (or someone else active in the IPMC) to > have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc0

+1 (binding) > On Dec 28, 2018, at 2:07 PM, Steffen Rochel wrote: > > Dear community, > > This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.4.0, release > candidate 0 > > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release. > > Vote thread: >

Re: Incubator exit interview

Yeah... I remember chatting w/ you about this idea at ApacheCon... +1 > On Dec 7, 2018, at 10:15 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > I was just wondering if it would be a good idea to ask projects a few > questions of committers/PPMC members once they leave the incubator to gauge > how we

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating) Composer module 0.9.0 (rc1)

only has two mentors (Bertrand Delacretaz and Jim > Jagielski), so we need at least one vote beyond our mentors to be able to > close this voting thread. > > thank you, > > --dave > > [1] > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8b182e4b0ad7e402f4be61500285abedf440672

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.3.1.rc0

+1 (binding) > On Nov 21, 2018, at 9:30 AM, Anton Chernov wrote: > > Dear community, > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.1, release > candidate 0. > > Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release. > > Vote thread: >

Re: [VOTE][LAZY][IP CLEARANCE] OpenWhisk Composer

+1 > On Nov 17, 2018, at 10:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > Hi Incubator PMC members, > > The OpenwWhisk podling would like to accept a donation of the Composer > module, as per https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-222 > > See

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

> On Nov 15, 2018, at 2:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > > I see this as a two-level thing: > > a) The source release is an Act of the Foundation, it is what the > foundation produces > > b) For the binaries, the PMC states that it thinks they are good and > declares that the

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

The reason we "only officially" support source code releases is because that is what we produce. > On Nov 14, 2018, at 6:24 AM, Myrle Krantz wrote: > > I had understood the reason that the foundation only officially supports > source releases to be the fear of undetected malware in the release

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

56 sum and maybe the > binary is even signed, but best practice is for you to download the source > and be in control of building the binary. > > > > - Carlos Santana > @csantanapr > >> On Nov 7, 2018, at 7:04 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

Just a FYI that in the early days of the ASF (and the httpd project), community binaries were a common offering... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: UNICEF Open Source project- Apache Foundation

Hello there! I would be quite willing to chat. My personal cell is +1 (443) 324-8390. > On Oct 26, 2018, at 1:59 PM, Ariam Mogos wrote: > > Hi there, > > I work in UNICEF’s Office of Innovation and was hoping to speak to someone > about a fantastic open source project in which we’re

Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"?

+1. That distinction is important. The ASF, and our projects, release source code. > On Oct 25, 2018, at 6:39 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > Those are "convenience binaries" ... not "binary releases". > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 2:25 AM Luciano Resende > wrote: > >> While I agree that binary

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating): python, php and swift runtimes 1.12.0 [RC1]

+1 (binding) > On Sep 18, 2018, at 12:28 PM, Vincent S Hou wrote: > > Dear IPMC members, > > This is a call for vote to release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating): OpenWhisk > python, php and swift runtimes 1.12.0 [RC1]. > > The Apache OpenWhisk community has voted on and approved a proposal to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating): python, php and swift runtimes 1.12.0 [RC1]

+1 (binding) > On Sep 18, 2018, at 12:28 PM, Vincent S Hou wrote: > > Dear IPMC members, > > This is a call for vote to release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating): OpenWhisk > python, php and swift runtimes 1.12.0 [RC1]. > > The Apache OpenWhisk community has voted on and approved a proposal to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.13.0 release RC2

Sorry for the delay... +1 for the source release (binding) but I agree w/ removing the binary > On Sep 17, 2018, at 6:27 PM, Abhishek Tiwari wrote: > > Ping. > > Can someone help us review and vote :) > > Regards > Abhishek > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 2:59 PM Abhishek Tiwari wrote: > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating): OpenWhisk catalog and apigateway 0.9.0 [RC1]

+1 (binding) > On Sep 10, 2018, at 11:14 AM, Vincent S Hou wrote: > > Dear IPMC members, > > This is a call for vote to release Apache OpenWhisk (Incubating): OpenWhisk > catalog and apigateway 0.9.0 [RC1]. > > The Apache OpenWhisk community has voted on and approved a proposal to >

Re: [VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.1.1-incubating Candidate 1

+1 on release... and +1 on removing the SHA-1s > On Sep 11, 2018, at 7:34 PM, Henk P. Penning wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Jerry Peng wrote: > >> Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:31:35 +0200 >> From: Jerry Peng >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Cc: d...@pulsar.incubator.apache.org >>

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Pulsar (incubating) as a TLP

are > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Pulsar Project: > > * Boyang Jerry Peng mailto:jerryp...@apache.org>> > * Brad McMillen mailto:bra...@apache.org>> > * David Fisher mailto:w...@apache.org>> > * Francis Christopher Liu mailto:to

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pulsar (incubating) as a TLP

nitial members of the Apache Pulsar Project: > > * Boyang Jerry Peng mailto:jerryp...@apache.org>> > * Brad McMillen mailto:bra...@apache.org>> > * David Fisher mailto:w...@apache.org>> > * Francis Christopher Liu mailto:tof...@apache.org>> > * Hiroyuki S

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pulsar (incubating) as a TLP

Even Events is there under the Community tab. > On Sep 11, 2018, at 12:33 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Just a couple of minor things I noticed on the website which checking it. > While this is mostly red [1] all seems all links are there other than Events? > I'm curious to why

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.3.0 release RC0

+1 (binding) > On Sep 10, 2018, at 8:21 PM, Roshani Nagmote > wrote: > > Thanks for testing the release and voting. I will remove md5 hashes as > instructed. > > Just a reminder: voting will end tomorrow, (Tuesday, September 11th, > 11:30am PDT). > It will be great if more members can test

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >