+1
--kevan
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:33 AM, eberhard speer jr. ses...@ducis.net
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this is the (source only) release email for Apache DeviceMap .Net
clients :
Apache DeviceMap csharp incubating 1.0.0.0
and
Apache DeviceMap vbnet
I've gotten the DeviceMap Community to generate the following report. Sorry
for the delay.
Bertrand and I have been pretty busy. If any spare mentor-energy is
available, I'm sure we'd welcome the help with the community... We need to
move the community forward or consider the alternatives...
On Jun 4, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 4, 2013 4:22 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Simple as that.
If only.
This is the old what goes in the NOTICE file debate that has
On Jun 4, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:58 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 4, 2013, at 8:46 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 4, 2013 4:22 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
This when in doubt
On Jun 4, 2013, at 9:34 AM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jun 3, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said, it does look good. But I don't see the LinkedIn Copyright
in any files under tools/. The copyright/license header should remain
in the files that
On Jun 2, 2013, at 10:09 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jun 2, 2013, at 5:29 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 June 2013 00:37, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
On Jun 2, 2013, at 4:01 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Modified:
On Jun 2, 2013, at 11:08 PM, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
Apache Incubator tools
Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation
This product includes software developed at
The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
This distribution contains code from the
Here's my +1
--kevan
On Oct 14, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
The Kitty community has voted to retire the project. I'm now moving the
retirement vote to the Incubator PMC.
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1 to retire the Kitty project
[ ] 0 for Don't care
[ ] -1
This vote passes with 10 +1 votes and no others.
+1 votes from: Ross, Dave, Christian, Benson, Mark, Bertrand, Daniel, Alan,
Jukka, and Kevan.
Will begin the retirement process for the project.
--kevan
On Oct 14, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
The Kitty community has voted
All,
The Kitty community has voted to retire the project. I'm now moving the
retirement vote to the Incubator PMC.
Please cast your vote:
[ ] +1 to retire the Kitty project
[ ] 0 for Don't care
[ ] -1 for No, please keep it alive (please provide arguments why)
Thanks,
--kevan
On Aug 10, 2012, at 7:31 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
There is still one open questions here, let me summarize it again:
OCAD[1] contributed files via JIRA[2] to the ASF,
Those files already had a license header (GPL) example: [3].
What is the correct way to handle that?
Replace
On Aug 10, 2012, at 2:32 PM, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kevan,
in Jira there is a special checkbox when you attach files Grant rights of
files to the ASF. From what I understood that is sufficient if the author
of the code contributes to the ASF.
However as our mentors on the dev
On Aug 1, 2012, at 12:57 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Apache Wiki wikidi...@apache.org wrote:
+ VCL graduated from the Incubator.
Indeed it did, thanks for the reminder!
We should update our records to reflect that, VCL is still listed as
incubating in
On Jul 7, 2012, at 10:22 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
The following projects haven't signed off on the copyright checklist item:
2009-02-09 kato
2009-02-13 stonehenge
2009-05-13 socialsite
2010-05-19 amber
2010-09-05 nuvem
2010-11-12 kitty
2010-11-24 stanbol
2011-06-13
On Jun 26, 2012, at 7:43 AM, seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
@Sebb: Which of the Libraries do you think are duplicates?
About License VS Notice file. From what I understood from
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-license
The NOTICE document is for
On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:40 AM, sebb wrote:
On 26 June 2012 13:28, seba.wag...@gmail.com seba.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the feedback and review so far!
About correct attribution of ASF JARs
Do they need a reference in the LICENSE file at all ?
The recipient of the package needs to
On Jun 22, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
Kevan-
Hi Chris,
Thanks for elaborating.
Please appreciate that there is universal agreement that (1) listing
and maintaining all transitive dependencies and licenses is a sound
service
It's more than sound. We are required to meet the
On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:42 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Hi, Jun,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree that to the benefit of users, it would be reasonable for Apache
projects to include license/notice for all dependant jars (directly or
indirectly) in a
On Jun 21, 2012, at 10:46 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jun 21, 2012, at 5:45 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
Obeying dependency license provisions is not an ASF policy, it's a legal
requirement. Fairness is
On Jun 21, 2012, at 6:33 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
If a project has a gazillion dependencies, regardless of whether those
dependencies are direct or transitive, that makes dealing with licensing
more
challenging
On Jun 21, 2012, at 10:44 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
+1
If this is going to be a new hard requirement the people who feel strongly
about this should add something to Rat or write some kind of a plugin.
Check out the recent 0.3 Airavata release. I didn't review it, until just now.
On Jun 22, 2012, at 3:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
This is why documenting transitive dependencies is so dangerous.
Should we stop?
No. The solution is that projects should control their dependencies
On Jun 21, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jun 19, 2012, at 8:13 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jun 18, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
Kevin,
Thanks for the comments. Just want to clarify on your points on
LICENSE/NOTICE. Our LICENSE/NOTICE covers all jars included
On Jun 21, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 21, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
With that said, I think it's something good and extremely useful to strive
for. The lack of it, i.e
Thanks for the improvements Joe!
I'm still -1 based on the licensing and binary artifacts in your source.
(binding)
--kevan
On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:19 PM, Joe Stein wrote:
Hello,
This is the third candidate for the second incubator release for Apache
Kafka, version 0.7.1-incubating.
On Jun 21, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
Great. We're not distributing the Snappy codec, so- according to the
reasoning of board@, legal@, and the IPMC on the 0.7.0 release- the
NOTICE and LICENSE files do not require updates. We're not starting
from first principles at every
On Jun 18, 2012, at 9:34 PM, Joe Stein wrote:
I uploaded a md5 checksum
http://people.apache.org/~joestein/kafka-0.7.1-incubating-candidate-2/ to
go along with the detached signature that was generated already
Thanks.
starting the kafka server is in the quick start
On Jun 18, 2012, at 9:51 PM, Jun Rao wrote:
Kevin,
Thanks for the comments. Just want to clarify on your points on
LICENSE/NOTICE. Our LICENSE/NOTICE covers all jars included in the source,
not those pulled in during building. We had a long discussion during our
1st release and in the
Things that I've noted:
I don't see a checksum for your release in
http://people.apache.org/~joestein/kafka-0.7.1-incubating-candidate-2/ -- your
release manager will need to generate a checksum for the release.
It would be nice if your archive extracted into an
apache-kafka-0.7.1-incubating
On May 23, 2012, at 10:11 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
-kafka-private
+kafka-dev
+general
Ahh, account was only created. According to root:
Only PMC chairs can grant karma. If needed, please post to the general@/
dev@/private@ list of your project asking for someone with sufficient
On May 9, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the report, Wink, and for the review, Dave!
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
From activity it looks
On Apr 5, 2012, at 6:36 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Reports from DeviceMap, Kitty, Oozie, Syncope and Tashi are still
missing (deadline was yesterday). If possible, please report by the
end of the week so we'll have time for review and feedback. Otherwise
please report again next month.
+1
--kevan
On Feb 8, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been a [VOTE],
+1 (binding)
--kevan
On Feb 7, 2012, at 6:29 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
Hi...
It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache
BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or
not, [1], [2] and [3].
In the past few weeks there has been
/devicemap
=== Issue Tracking ===
DMAP project in JIRA.
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
Bertrand Delacretaz
=== Nominated Mentors ===
* Sylvain Wallez
* Kevan Miller
* Bertrand Delacretaz
=== Sponsoring Entity ===
Incubator PMC
*** DeviceMap proposal ends
On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:45 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
Personally I don't believe whirr is in error. Voldemort is under
Apache 2.0 license, and as such falls under this:
On Dec 6, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
Here's another one, say Apache TLP A includes works from Apache TLP B,
is this (B) a third-party work or not? Are the parties in this
case singular the ASF or the TLPs? Specifically, do I need to
include the NOTICE file from B in the NOTICE
Our 72 hour window has passed. So, I'm calling this IP CLEARANCE complete.
Thanks!
--kevan
On Nov 29, 2011, at 5:09 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
The Apache Geronimo project has received a contribution which
On Dec 2, 2011, at 3:51 PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
So I hope it's clear why it's frustrating to
have this rule suddenly pop up when it's apparently not enforced in
the majority of cases (and then to be asked to go and open JIRAs for
each of these projects on top of it).
This requirement is
On Dec 1, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
As it stands, either the NOTICE file is wrong, or the LICENSE file is
wrong, because the NOTICE file should not mention 3rd party products
that are not in the LICENSE file.
Thanks for the feedback! As I have already mentioned, we are
The Apache Geronimo project has received a contribution which updates a number
of Geronimo dependencies and associated code updates.
The code contributions have been attached to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6217
I've committed the IP Clearance form to the Incubator website --
On Nov 28, 2011, at 12:51 PM, Neha Narkhede wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, I still have some questions.
1. Alan, this nunit license acknowledgement is missing from the NOTICE file
since RC1 and RC1 had the nunit files. Since cutting RCs is a significant
time investment, we'd appreciate if
On Nov 20, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I've had been using a high bar with the podlings I
mentor/participate. I'll look into graduating couple podlings after I
come back from Thanks Giving :
On Nov 17, 2011, at 2:10 PM, sebb wrote:
On 17 November 2011 16:30, Jun Rao jun...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebb,
Just to want to clarify on the source distribution. It seems there are
other Apache projects that release a single distribution with both source
code and jars. For example,
I took a look at the svn source and the binary artifact and have some
additional comments.
1) Your svn contains a number of jar files. I don't believe that the
LICENSE/NOTICE file properly reflects the license/notice requirements of these
jar files.
2) Why are these jars being stored in your
On Oct 24, 2011, at 8:37 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 25/10/2011, at 9:02 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
With respect ot an early version of the report, there was confusion as to
which podlings needed to report this month, but we appear to have it
straightened out. The Wiki page had a few too
On Aug 21, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Etch and Tashi are signed off.
Droids (seems the easiest one to sign off on) and Olio (likely to be
retired) left from 2008 inductees.
2009 list remains unchanged from below.
Wink is on my ToDo list. Just need a bit of free time...
On Jul 7, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Thursday, July 07, 2011 9:32:37 AM Karl Wright wrote:
OK - so now I'm getting conflicting advice. Somebody went through a
fair bit of effort to implement the geronimo versions of all these
packages, including saaj-impl. Are you saying that
+1 (binding).
--kevan
On Jun 22, 2011, at 12:55 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
The Stonehenge project pretty much accomplished what it originally set out to
do and then really didn't find a way to transition to something that is
longer
lasting and able to develop a community around it.
On Jun 10, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down,
I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apache
Incubator project.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here
days.
--kevan
On May 10, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
The Imperius podling has voted to retire/suspend/terminate/dormantify the
Imperius podling. I'm now bringing the vote to the incubator pmc.
The vote was unanimous with 6 +1 votes (kevan miller, david wood, mark
carlson, neeraj
The Imperius podling has voted to retire/suspend/terminate/dormantify the
Imperius podling. I'm now bringing the vote to the incubator pmc.
The vote was unanimous with 6 +1 votes (kevan miller, david wood, mark carlson,
neeraj joshi, david kaminsky, and craig russell).
From the original vote
FYI. A vote has been started on the Imperius dev list to retire the Imperius
podling.
--kevan
Begin forwarded message:
From: Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
Date: May 5, 2011 9:25:10 PM EDT
To: imperius-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Retire the Imperius Podling
All,
We
Hi Luciano,
Signatures, checksums, source, license/notice, and build all look good.
Here's my +1
--kevan
On Apr 18, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
The Wink community has completed a vote on it's 1.1.3 release
(1.1.3-incubating) and is now looking for IPMC approval to publish
the
On Apr 6, 2011, at 7:52 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
72 hours has passed.
Should I re-open vote?
Hi Edward,
72 hours is the normal waiting time for a vote. Many votes run for a longer
period of time. There's no need to re-open a vote.
FYI, I never received your original vote email. Not sure
Hi Josh,
Appreciate the bump...
Looks really good. Nice job!
One question -- what is the license for the .css files under
web/themes/default/css/dojo/? I'm assuming they are AFL? Not clear from the
information in the LICENSE file.
Aside from the above, I'm +1
--kevan
On Mar 29, 2011, at
On Feb 23, 2011, at 4:55 AM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
+1
However there might be a name conflict with the Howl transaction log over at
object web here:
http://howl.ow2.org/
http://howl.ow2.org/Originally from the title, I immediately thought the
proposal was for OW's HOWL implementation
Hi Luciano,
Apologies for the slow review... Things look good, except for one problem, I
think...
Source, sigs/checksums, and build all look good.
I don't like the licensing information in photark-webapp-M3-incubating.war
First, note how there are redundant license files in
+1 (binding)
--kevan
On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Dan Peterson wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
(for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below)
The
+1
--kevan
On Nov 22, 2010, at 6:51 AM, Jeremy Hughes wrote:
Hi IPMCers and Incubator community,
The Aries community has been discussing graduation and we feel we are
ready to graduate to a new TLP [1]. We subsequently voted [2]. As a
commnunity we were unanimous in deciding to graduate to
On Nov 15, 2010, at 3:03 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
All of these reports are missing and need to be posted IMMEDIATELY!
I could swear that I added a report for Kitty, yesterday. Was extremely light
-- as the podling is just getting set up. No real news to report, yet.
--kevan
On Nov 15, 2010, at 9:16 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
- VCL appears to be active, with no reason for the lack of a report.
Correct. I didn't find an incubator notice/reminder that had been mailed to the
project list. So, it's possible that they didn't get a reminder. I did ping
their list
+1. Source, sigs/checksums, build -- all look good.
Thanks Chris!
--kevan
On Nov 11, 2010, at 10:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have posted a 3rd candidate for the Apache SIS 0.1-incubating release. The
source code is at:
On Nov 10, 2010, at 7:14 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
just figured that Apache SIS != Apache Isis
First thought Chris mistyped it while releasing ... ;)
A few notes:
You should upgrade to apache-parent-7. You currently don't seem to have an
automated rat check in your build. Running
$
On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi,
We received an empty two page fax with this identifying information:
28/10/2010 08:42 01962816898
If you know of anyone who is trying to send us a document please ask them to
retransmit.
I expect that this is from the Aries
On Oct 18, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Please evaluate the status of your project with respect to graduation. Why,
for example, are Thrift and JSPWiki not yet ready to fly? What about Ace?
Others?
FYI, the Aries project is actively discussing graduation.
The Wink project
On Sep 29, 2010, at 3:24 PM, matt...@matthewsacks.com wrote:
Hi List,
I would like to do a quick sanity check on this thread.
Please correct me if I am wrong, but we have 2 binding PMC votes, 2 new
contributors (Rainer Jung and Senaka Fernando) and 1 new mentor (Kevan
Miller).
More
On Sep 15, 2010, at 3:20 AM, msacks wrote:
At the advisement of the list, we have created a brand-new thread here
for voting on the kitty proposal.
The wiki page is located at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KittyProposal
+1
IIUC, You currently have 2 mentors. You can sign me up as a 3rd.
+1
--kevan
On Aug 18, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
- Original Message
From: Joe Schaefer
On Aug 17, 2010, at 5:09 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Dunno if it's exactly documentation but see this from Roy Fielding
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-26?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12732740#action_12732740
Based on this
On Aug 16, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hey Noel,
I uploaded an SIS report just now on the wiki. Any SIS mentors lurking
around, please check it out and sign off. Thanks!
Done. Thanks Chris.
--kevan
On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Presumably there was no valid basis for the -1? Sucks, but Joe's proposal
doesn't change the fact that any PMC Member can still vote on any project.
The ASF does not have subprojects, there is only one PMC. We have gone
through this with
+1
Signature/checksums, build, source (RAT), and general snooping around with
emacs all looked good. Thanks Donald!
--kevan
On Aug 13, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
A Bean Validation 0.2-incubating release candidate #2 has been created
with the following artifacts up for a vote:
+1 (binding)
Checked Signature/checksums, build, source, and general snooping around. All
looked good.
--kevan
On Aug 5, 2010, at 7:05 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
Hi,
the RAT developer team would like your approvement for a release of
Apache RAT 0.7.
The distribution files (binary and
Hi Donald,
-1. A build of the source distribution fails because of a RAT check. The source
distribution contains a DEPENDENCIES file (which is not in SVN). If I remove
the DEPENDENCIES file, the build succeeds.
Signature/checksums, source, and general snooping -- all look good. So, once
the
On May 24, 2010, at 8:58 PM, David Crossley wrote:
The following are listed this month:
abdera buildr log4php openwebbeans subversion trafficserver uima
Thanks David. OpenWebBeans should be clear, now. I just removed Incubator
distribution.
--kevan
+1 (binding)
--kevan
On May 12, 2010, at 8:45 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
Hi all,
after the discussion so far [1], I'd like to put Detlacloud for a vote
for acceptance into the Apache Incubator according to the proposal[2]
I _think_ I've added everybody who expressed interest in being a
+1
--kevan
On May 5, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Tom White wrote:
We've added three mentors since starting the proposal thread, so I
would like to start the vote to accept Whirr into the Apache
Incubator.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WhirrProposal
+1 (binding)
--kevan
On May 4, 2010, at 6:48 PM, Simone Gianni wrote:
I would like to present for a vote the following proposal to be sponsored by
the Shindig PMC for a new Amber podling. The goal is to build a community
around delivering a OAuth v1.0, v1.0a and upcoming v2.0 API and
On Mar 23, 2010, at 7:16 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Patrick Hunt wrote:
Are there any issues with Apache tlps using incubator releases? I've heard,
but cannot find any official documentation, that tlps should not. Is this
really the case? Are there any rules/guidelines for this?
I don't
+1
--kevan
On Mar 4, 2010, at 4:18 AM, Gav... wrote:
Hi All,
The Log4PHP community has voted [1] with 5 +1 votes and no other votes as
follows, to graduate to become a sub-project of the Logging Project.
* Gavin McDonald
* Christian Hammers
* Jim Jagielski
* Jesus Christian (non
On Feb 26, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On 26 Feb 2010, at 19:01, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Feb 23, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:51:35 -0500
Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
I'm open to suggestions BeanValidation, OpenValidation, Validera
On Feb 23, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:51:35 -0500
Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org wrote:
I'm open to suggestions BeanValidation, OpenValidation, Validera, ...
Any of those work for me, though OpenValidation has a hint of the
same problem. BeanValidation
incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation. I think the following sums up where we
landed on that issue (at least it pretty well sums up where I landed on the
issue):
On Jan 18, 2010, at 9:55 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
I think we'd agree that a fair amount of community
Champion
* Kevan Miller
Nominated Mentors
* Kevan Miller
* Niall Pemberton
* Luciano Resende
Sponsoring Entity
* Apache Incubator PMC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:22 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
+1 to accept Validation into the Incubator
afterwards we still can see where it actually ends up
however I for sure want to see this at Apache.
If you guys need a champion or mentor, count me in !!
We have 3 mentors. If you're
On Feb 24, 2010, at 8:55 AM, James Carman wrote:
Sorry, didn't read the proposal very closely. The idea was that it
would be brought into Commons Validator and become the 2.x codebase.
I like that idea and I would think it would be wise to go through the
incubator to make sure the codebase
On Jan 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Thanks. I'll get with Kevan to update the proposal before we finally
submit it for a vote.
Oops. Donald, we never synced up. My fault. Let's get this moving along.
IMO, we should structure the project as a normal incubator project, use
On Feb 17, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
I'll mentor the damned thing if nobody else will. Maybe I'll
learn something from Ian since he was so successful with cassandra.
I'd been considering helping out mentoring, also. Sounds like we have a
preferred minimum of 3, but I'm
+1
--kevan
On Feb 16, 2010, at 10:15 PM, Ian Holsman wrote:
Given the lack of response on the proposal, I'll assume lazy consensus and
call a vote.
I'd like to propose incubation for a new project called the Spatial
Information Systems (SIS). I think we have all the
necessary bits in
Here's my +1 (binding).
Reviewed source and rat output. I didn't do any testing. One minor note: the
copyright year in the notice file is 2009.
--kevan
On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:30 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
The Apache Libcloud project is currently voting on our first release,
0.2.0. As required by
+1 (binding). Good luck.
--kevan
On Feb 11, 2010, at 11:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Hello all,
I started a discussion thread a week-ish ago to seek out issues for
Subversion's graduation. The couple bits that were raised[1] have been
handled, I believe. So with that said, I am unaware of any
+1 (binding)
Good luck.
--kevan
On Jan 28, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
Greetings,
We took the feedback from the earlier discussion[1] here and added our
active mentors to the proposed PMC, (for a total of 7 people), then ran
that through a new community vote[2].
[1]
On Jan 25, 2010, at 3:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Hi all,
Before calling for a vote to graduate Subversion, I figured it prudent
to have a discussion first. I believe Subversion is quite ready (and
has been, but the holidays and whatnot kept me from sending this
earlier).
Any thoughts on
On Jan 17, 2010, at 11:28 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Missing:
Imperius
Subversion
Thrift
VXQuery
These were due middle of last week, and are still not present.
Imperius report was created this morning and is on the wiki, now.
--kevan
On Jan 12, 2010, at 4:03 PM, ant elder wrote:
+1
Thanks Ant. All, still need at least one more review/vote.
--kevan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Dec 30, 2009, at 4:55 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
This is not quite the scenario. We have a *dormant* component
(validator) in Commons and a couple of ASF committers (not commons
committers) have shown up proposing to re-write that component to
implement the new Bean Valiadation
OpenWebBeans graduation
[] -1 OpenWebBeans shoud not graduate yet, because
Unless they explicitly vote otherwise, I'm including the
following
IPMC member votes from the community vote also in the tally of
this
vote:
+1 Kevan Miller
+1 Matthias Wessendorf
within the scope of
responsibility
of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
appointed
to serve as the initial members of the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC:
* Gurkan Erdogdu (gurkanerdogdu at yahoo dot com)
* Kevan
On Nov 24, 2009, at 5:27 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote:
Jason
It is very worrying that you got threatening emails from anyone
involved in the project. Have you brought this up with the mentors? Do
you feel that the project needs further independent mentors?
Worrying to me, also. I've certainly
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
