[gentoo-amd64] Re: No New Image 12th February 2023

Broken builds for amd64 today too :( On 1/16/23, Luna Jernberg wrote: > Hey! > > Did the ISO builds not go as planned last week? >

[gentoo-amd64] Re: No New Image 15th January 2023?

ajak told me on IRC it might be because of this build failure: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-releng-autobuilds/message/ff7410976ec0a326838c9879f39ed7b5 On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 2:59 AM Luna Jernberg wrote: > > Hey! > > Did the ISO builds not go as planned last week?

[gentoo-amd64] No New Image 15th January 2023?

Hey! Did the ISO builds not go as planned last week?

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Can Gentoo be installed on AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-core processor?

On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 1:11 AM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming < tdtemc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Subject: Can Gentoo be installed on AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-core processor? > > Good day from Singapore, > Hello back from Tucson > Can Gentoo be installed on AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-core processor? >

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Can Gentoo be installed on AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-core processor?

Hello, On 8/5/22 04:11, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote: Subject: Can Gentoo be installed on AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-core processor? Good day from Singapore, Can Gentoo be installed on AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-core processor? Yes, Gentoo can be installed on a 5950X. I have a friend who is

[gentoo-amd64] Can Gentoo be installed on AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-core processor?

Subject: Can Gentoo be installed on AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-core processor? Good day from Singapore, Can Gentoo be installed on AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-core processor? I have a friend who is very rich. He wants to build/DIY a desktop computer based on AMD Ryzen 9 5000 series 16-core processor. Thank

[gentoo-amd64] sddm woes

It seems that every time I upgrade kde, sddm stops working. The annoying thing is that I can't tell what is going wrong. /var/log/sddm.log ... [14:11:58.505] (II) DAEMON: Initializing... [14:11:58.533] (II) DAEMON: Starting... [14:11:58.533] (II) DAEMON: Adding new display on vt 7 ...

[gentoo-amd64] Re: firefox e10s tab crashes on accessing the net (not about: however)

Duncan posted on Sun, 26 Mar 2017 14:53:04 + as excerpted: > When I enable firefox electrolysis (aka e10s) browser-internal pages > such as about:config, about:support, and about:addons, load, but nothing > actually on the web will load -- the progress bar goes all the way > across and just

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Blocks?

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Uwe Haider wrote: > > emerge -auDtv world gives me this: > > [blocks B ] (" dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2016) > > Total: 19 packages (15 upgrades, 1 new, 1 in new slot, 2 reinstalls), > Size of downloads: 111.507 KiB > Conflict: 1 block (1

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Blocks?

Am Mittwoch, 14. Juni 2017, 07:27:45 CEST schrieb Uwe Haider: > emerge -auDtv world gives me this: > [snip blockers] > > The problem is all requested texlive-related packages are keyworded ( > ~amd64): > > eix -I texlive > [I] app-text/texlive-core > Verfügbare Versionen: 2012-r1

[gentoo-amd64] Blocks?

emerge -auDtv world gives me this: [blocks B ] =dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2016 required by (dev-texlive/texlive-metapost-2016:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) For more information about Blocked Packages, please refer to the following section of the Gentoo Linux x86 Handbook

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Radeon driver not working (solved)

It looks like while cleaning up I de-installed linux-firmware, found this by looking at dmesg. Reinstalled the firmware & all good now. On 31 May 2017 5:00 PM, "Daiajo Tibdixious" wrote: I can't actually send from the machine so its hard to include stuff. I'm not looking for a

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Radeon driver not working

I can't actually send from the machine so its hard to include stuff. I'm not looking for a solution, just things to try. I'm on kernel 4.9.16-gentoo GPU is Turks XT (Radeon HD 6500/7670) Kernel is setup according to the gentoo radeon guide, I compared it to 4.4.6 kernel, which has been working

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Radeon driver not working

That's odd, I put radeon in /etc.conf.d/modules ages ago & it never loaded. On 31 May 2017 3:02 pm, "Uwe Haider" wrote: Am 31.05.2017 um 06:29 schrieb Daiajo Tibdixious: > (as an aside, where do I put modules to autoload?) just have a look here (Handbook amd64):

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Radeon driver not working

Am 31.05.2017 um 06:29 schrieb Daiajo Tibdixious: > (as an aside, where do I put modules to autoload?) just have a look here (Handbook amd64): https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Installation/Kernel#Configuring_the_modules For the rest of your questions I can't help. I am using

[gentoo-amd64] Radeon driver not working

For a while now I've been logging into root & doing "modprobe radeon" after which the screen will blank, then come back at a much higher resolution. (as an aside, where do I put modules to autoload?) Since the last reboot nothing happens. SDDM/KDE will not start. I have checked all the radeon

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

Mark Knecht skrev den 2017-05-03 02:10: Anyway, I think it's fixed unless someone points out an issue. some mua can reply in same format as the original sender do, so if the sender sends html posts replyes would in some cases be in html format aswell, not always desired on maillists most

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

Dale skrev den 2017-05-03 01:58: I wonder what mine looks like??? User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:51.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/51.0 SeaMonkey/2.48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit perfect

[gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

Mark Knecht posted on Tue, 02 May 2017 14:30:02 -0700 as excerpted: > I think I found the GMail setting to ensure completely plain > text responses. Please respond if that doesn't appear to be the case. This one is indeed plain text. Thanks. =:^) Tho one caution you should be aware of. Some

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Dale wrote: > Mark Knecht wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Allan Wegan >> wrote: Please turn off the HTML posts. >>> His post is a multipart message containing an additional plaintext >>> version. If

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

Mark Knecht wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Allan Wegan wrote: >>> Please turn off the HTML posts. >> His post is a multipart message containing an additional plaintext >> version. If you saw the HTML version, your client is broken or >> misconfigured. >> >> >>

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > Mark Knecht posted on Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:43:29 -0700 as excerpted: > > > 3) Respectfully, I'm not sure your answer encompasses the problems and > > frustrations of having to maintain OTHER people's computers. I don't > >

[gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

Mark Knecht posted on Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:43:29 -0700 as excerpted: > 3) Respectfully, I'm not sure your answer encompasses the problems and > frustrations of having to maintain OTHER people's computers. I don't > hear you speak of that very often. The problem with KDE is on my wife's > computer.

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > Mark Knecht posted on Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:36:43 -0700 as excerpted: > > > I certainly could chroot a specific copy of Gentoo and build on my > > machine. I might also be able to build binary packages on my fast > > machine

[gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

Mark Knecht posted on Mon, 24 Apr 2017 08:36:43 -0700 as excerpted: > I certainly could chroot a specific copy of Gentoo and build on my > machine. I might also be able to build binary packages on my fast > machine and then do an emerge -k type install and see if it works. > > However, in the

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:18 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > Mark Knecht posted on Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:38:59 -0700 as excerpted: > > > As for my wife's laptop which started this discussion I had an emerge 2 > > weeks ago of about 200 packages, mostly KDE, which took almost 24 hours >

[gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

Mark Knecht posted on Sat, 22 Apr 2017 11:38:59 -0700 as excerpted: > As for my wife's laptop which started this discussion I had an emerge 2 > weeks ago of about 200 packages, mostly KDE, which took almost 24 hours > to build on a 5-6 year old laptop.This time around I have about 175 > packages

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Marc Joliet wrote: > > On Montag, 17. April 2017 03:17:21 CEST Duncan wrote: > > Martin Vaeth posted on Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:01:00 + as excerpted: > > > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > >> If you're not using radeon/amdgpu, you can

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

On Montag, 17. April 2017 03:17:21 CEST Duncan wrote: > Martin Vaeth posted on Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:01:00 + as excerpted: > > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > >> If you're not using radeon/amdgpu, you can probably disable it with > >> little consequence. > > > > Googleearth on intel's

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

Duncan wrote: > Mark Knecht posted on Mon, 17 Apr 2017 21:15:00 -0700 as excerpted: > >> Geez Duncan, get over it. > I was over it. One sentence request as I was answering the question that > was asked. That was it. > > Until someone (not you!) questioned that one sentence request and I >

[gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

Mark Knecht posted on Mon, 17 Apr 2017 21:15:00 -0700 as excerpted: > Geez Duncan, get over it. I was over it. One sentence request as I was answering the question that was asked. That was it. Until someone (not you!) questioned that one sentence request and I needed to fill in the

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > or in best case (which I believe this was), because > the sender simply didn't care enough about their readers to actually > check and see, before sending. > > -- > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. > "Every

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

>>> Please turn off the HTML posts. >> His post is a multipart message containing an additional plaintext >> version. If you saw the HTML version, your client is broken or >> misconfigured. > My client presented both versions as plain text, as arguably it > should (because some broken clients

[gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

Allan Wegan posted on Mon, 17 Apr 2017 22:31:36 +0200 as excerpted: >> Please turn off the HTML posts. > > His post is a multipart message containing an additional plaintext > version. If you saw the HTML version, your client is broken or > misconfigured. My client presented both versions as

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

> Please turn off the HTML posts. His post is a multipart message containing an additional plaintext version. If you saw the HTML version, your client is broken or misconfigured. -- Allan Wegan Jabber: allanwe...@ffnord.net OTR-Fingerprint: E4DCAA40 4859428E

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > Mark Knecht posted on Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:45:43 -0700 as excerpted: > > > My wife is not looking for high performance and the machine uses > > nvidia-drivers. (If it matters) > > > > As best I can tell using equery the only

[gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

Martin Vaeth posted on Sun, 16 Apr 2017 18:01:00 + as excerpted: > Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: >> >> If you're not using radeon/amdgpu, you can probably disable it with >> little consequence. > > Googleearth on intel's graphics card becomes unusable slow if mesa is > compiled

[gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > If you're not using radeon/amdgpu, you can probably disable it with > little consequence. Googleearth on intel's graphics card becomes unusable slow if mesa is compiled without llvm.

[gentoo-amd64] Re: How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

Mark Knecht posted on Sat, 15 Apr 2017 17:45:43 -0700 as excerpted: > My wife is not looking for high performance and the machine uses > nvidia-drivers. (If it matters) > > As best I can tell using equery the only package that seems to want it > is mesa and there's a llvm flag implying maybe I

[gentoo-amd64] How much value does llvm provide for a low-use laptop?

My wife is not looking for high performance and the machine uses nvidia-drivers. (If it matters) As best I can tell using equery the only package that seems to want it is mesa and there's a llvm flag implying maybe I can turn it off. I'm updating her machine and it's been grinding away on this

[gentoo-amd64] firefox e10s tab crashes on accessing the net (not about: however)

When I enable firefox electrolysis (aka e10s) browser-internal pages such as about:config, about:support, and about:addons, load, but nothing actually on the web will load -- the progress bar goes all the way across and just as the page appears to be parsing, TAB-CRASH, with the offer to (try

Re: [gentoo-amd64] can't log in gnome

Il giorno ven 17 feb 2017 alle 21:23 Mark Knecht ha scritto: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:07 PM, mr_L4N wrote: > > > > Yes, different user but same problem. > > > > The forums will generally provide answers pretty quickly, or check the > gentoo-user

Re: [gentoo-amd64] can't log in gnome

Yes, different user but same problem. Il 17 Feb 2017 8:59 PM, "Mark Knecht" ha scritto: > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Thanasis > wrote: > > > > I think, if you would like to get a more quick answer, you had better > subscribe and address

Re: [gentoo-amd64] can't log in gnome

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Thanasis wrote: > > I think, if you would like to get a more quick answer, you had better subscribe and address your issue to gentoo-user list where most of gentoo users are subscribed ... > (gentoo-u...@lists.gentoo.org) > > > On

[gentoo-amd64] can't log in gnome

Hi, I'm on gentoo 3.20 with systemd. From yesterday it's impossible to log in as user (works good as root), to gdm and shell, in 'normal mode' with password. If I set in gdm configuration the automatic access, I can log and work. I tried to create a new user with the same problem. I checked, pam,

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Recently many filesize problems for emerge

Its a known problem, there is a bug up about it (sorry forget the number). Apparently various files (like the digest) take a different path, and aren't being updated due to some problem with files getting updated without their time stamp changing, so rsync doesn't update them. I haven't had it

[gentoo-amd64] Recently many filesize problems for emerge

Hi, I wonder if anyone else has been seeing a lot of mismatches when attempting to emerge lately? I update about once a week, possibly twice a week, and it seems that every time for the last month or two there are always problems like this: !!! Digest verification failed: !!!

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gnome/gdm hangs after emerge

Thanks Duncan to suggest an obviuos solution that I'm not considering. With a deep update and clean, now system works "almost" fine...damn systemd. Now I'm ready to start a new mistake for a disk (NTFS partition) in auto-mount with fuse, that I can see in shell, but not in gnome...after an

Re: [gentoo-amd64] radeon driver problems

Duncan wrote: >Still directly under graphics: > >Frame buffer Devices > >This is hard-enabled here by options I've set elsewhere. > >*** WARNING, UNINTUITIVE *** > >Do *not* set ATI Radeon display support here, under frame-buffer >devices. On the wiki it's unset, but it's both unintuitive and

Re: [gentoo-amd64] radeon driver problems

my Graphics support section is attached from a 4.6 kernel# Graphics support # CONFIG_AGP=y CONFIG_AGP_AMD64=m # CONFIG_AGP_INTEL is not set # CONFIG_AGP_SIS is not set # CONFIG_AGP_VIA is not set CONFIG_VGA_ARB=y CONFIG_VGA_ARB_MAX_GPUS=6 # CONFIG_VGA_SWITCHEROO is not set CONFIG_DRM=m #

Re: [gentoo-amd64] radeon driver problems

On Sun, 2016-10-09 at 08:03 +1100, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote: > On 9 Oct 2016 7:45 am, "Daiajo Tibdixious" wrote: > > > > On 9 Oct 2016 12:09 am, "Drake Donahue" > wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 20:35 +1100, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote: > > > This

[gentoo-amd64] Re: radeon driver problems

Daiajo Tibdixious posted on Sat, 08 Oct 2016 20:35:55 +1100 as excerpted: > This relates to my ATI driver conflict with xorg-server problem. > Sorry if this comes though in html format I did not realise the last one > was in html mode. > I'm trying the solution to stop using fglrx and just use

Re: [gentoo-amd64] radeon driver problems

On 9 Oct 2016 7:45 am, "Daiajo Tibdixious" wrote: > > On 9 Oct 2016 12:09 am, "Drake Donahue" wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 20:35 +1100, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote: > > This relates to my ATI driver conflict with xorg-server problem. > > > Sorry if

Re: [gentoo-amd64] radeon driver problems

On Sat, 2016-10-08 at 20:35 +1100, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote: > This relates to my ATI driver conflict with xorg-server problem. > Sorry if this comes though in html format I did not realise the last > one was in html mode. > I'm trying the solution to stop using fglrx and just use the radeon >

[gentoo-amd64] radeon driver problems

This relates to my ATI driver conflict with xorg-server problem. Sorry if this comes though in html format I did not realise the last one was in html mode. I'm trying the solution to stop using fglrx and just use the radeon driver, however I'm getting weird problems. I removed fglrx from

[gentoo-amd64] ATI driver conflict with xorg-server

Doing this on phone as chromium update still going (in console mode). Ati-drivers-15.12-r1 requires xorg-server-1.17.4 or less, yet world update insists on pulling in xorg-server-1.8 which then pulls in masked versions of xf86-input-evdev & xf86-video-ati & and the emerge dies because the 2

[gentoo-amd64] Re: gnome/gdm hangs after emerge

mr_L4N posted on Wed, 05 Oct 2016 13:46:15 +0200 as excerpted: > I've launche revdep-rebuild; it found 2 problems about libcamel and > libedataserver. Portage is unable to automatic repair and §I'm working > on it. > > I think that these libraries, aren't blocking my DE. Are you agree? Based on

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gnome/gdm hangs after emerge

Hi Duncan, thanks for your reply. I've launche revdep-rebuild; it found 2 problems about libcamel and libedataserver. Portage is unable to automatic repair and §I'm working on it. I think that these libraries, aren't blocking my DE. Are you agree? 2016-10-04 21:46 GMT+02:00 Duncan

[gentoo-amd64] Re: gnome/gdm hangs after emerge

mr_L4N posted on Mon, 03 Oct 2016 10:42:27 +0200 as excerpted: > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3UY2_LU1HQOMlpmTGM4bTFzRDQ/view?usp=sharing > this works, Thanks, yes. Again with the disclaimer that I do kde not gnome and thus am unlikely to have a clue on gnome-specific issues, so the below

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: gnome/gdm hangs after emerge

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3UY2_LU1HQOMlpmTGM4bTFzRDQ/view?usp=sharing this works, 2016-10-03 3:12 GMT+02:00 Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>: > Gmail posted on Sun, 02 Oct 2016 13:17:14 +0200 as excerpted: > > > To understand this you can look a picture at > >

[gentoo-amd64] Re: gnome/gdm hangs after emerge

Gmail posted on Sun, 02 Oct 2016 13:17:14 +0200 as excerpted: > To understand this you can look a picture at > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B3UY2_LU1HQOMIpmTGM4bTFzRDQ/view Hi "Gmail" =:^) That give me a 404 (not found) error. I've not used google drive, but maybe you didn't set the file

[gentoo-amd64] gnome/gdm hangs after emerge

Hi, yesterday I've upgrade portage (about 30 upgrades) and now I can't login gnome..."Oh no something was gone wrong". After some changes and emerge (gdm, xorg and nvidia-drivers basically), if I start one clear tty and restart gdm, I have half desktop like gnome and half desktop like X To

Re: [gentoo-amd64] sddm - any config to not advertise user names?

On Monday 18 July 2016 16:07:34 Mark Knecht wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Marc Joliet wrote: > > On Sunday 17 July 2016 15:03:26 Mark Knecht wrote: > > > The push to Plasma 5 had me switch to sddm by default instead of kdm. > > Does > > > > anyone know how to

[gentoo-amd64] OT: Hotel wifi and general update Was: sddm ...

Mark Knecht posted on Mon, 18 Jul 2016 09:26:56 -0700 as excerpted: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: >> >> [N]o worries about *DM at all. I just login at the text prompt >> regardless of whether I'm headed for X or not, and startx just as if it >> was any

Re: [gentoo-amd64] sddm - any config to not advertise user names?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Marc Joliet wrote: > > On Sunday 17 July 2016 15:03:26 Mark Knecht wrote: > > The push to Plasma 5 had me switch to sddm by default instead of kdm. Does > > anyone know how to configure sddm to not advertise all user names on the > > login screen?

Re: [gentoo-amd64] sddm - any config to not advertise user names?

On Sunday 17 July 2016 15:03:26 Mark Knecht wrote: > The push to Plasma 5 had me switch to sddm by default instead of kdm. Does > anyone know how to configure sddm to not advertise all user names on the > login screen? I.e. - have users type both their user names as well as > passwords? > > Note

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: sddm - any config to not advertise user names?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > Mark Knecht posted on Mon, 18 Jul 2016 06:23:34 -0700 as excerpted: > > > I don't personally have a lot of interest but [...] > > > The other thing I liked about kdm was that the login only showed on my > > first monitor

[gentoo-amd64] Re: sddm - any config to not advertise user names?

Mark Knecht posted on Mon, 18 Jul 2016 06:23:34 -0700 as excerpted: > I don't personally have a lot of interest but [...] > The other thing I liked about kdm was that the login only showed on my > first monitor whereas sddm is showing it on all 3. Not a big deal as I > pretty much boot up in the

Re: [gentoo-amd64] sddm - any config to not advertise user names?

For a text-input box for username - try the elarun or maldives themes And fwiw - for a single-user desktop - I use auto-login (I wouldn't do this on a laptop - or if I thought anyone else had physical access) [Autologin] # Autologin again on session exit Relogin=false # Autologin session

Re: [gentoo-amd64] sddm - any config to not advertise user names?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 6:11 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 6:00 AM, malc wrote: > > > > From man sddm.conf > >MinimumUid= > > Minimum user id of the users to be listed in the user > > interface. Default value is

Re: [gentoo-amd64] sddm - any config to not advertise user names?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 6:00 AM, malc wrote: > > From man sddm.conf >MinimumUid= > Minimum user id of the users to be listed in the user > interface. Default value is 1000. >MaximumUid= > Maximum user id of the users to be listed in

Re: [gentoo-amd64] sddm - any config to not advertise user names?

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:00 AM, malc wrote: > > Hey Mark, > > From man sddm.conf >MinimumUid= > Minimum user id of the users to be listed in the user interface. Default value is 1000. >MaximumUid= > Maximum user id of the users to

Re: [gentoo-amd64] sddm - any config to not advertise user names?

These seem to be docs, but they don't seem particularly user focused. https://github.com/sddm/sddm/tree/master/docs -- Randy Barlow

Re: [gentoo-amd64] sddm - any config to not advertise user names?

Hey Mark, >From man sddm.conf MinimumUid= Minimum user id of the users to be listed in the user interface. Default value is 1000. MaximumUid= Maximum user id of the users to be listed in the user interface. Default value is 6 Presume if you just

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Wifi adaptor recommendations

Duncan posted on Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:41:44 + as excerpted: > Duncan posted on Sun, 29 May 2016 10:55:30 + as excerpted: > >> Duncan posted on Tue, 24 May 2016 21:47:57 + as excerpted: >> >>> But, unless it's effectively an Ethernet connected router, so no >>> drivers, >>> I'll need

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Wifi adaptor recommendations

Duncan posted on Sun, 29 May 2016 10:55:30 + as excerpted: > Duncan posted on Tue, 24 May 2016 21:47:57 + as excerpted: > >> But, unless it's effectively an Ethernet connected router, so no >> drivers, >> I'll need to pick it up and install drivers and a wifi config before I >> actually

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Wifi adaptor recommendations

Duncan posted on Tue, 24 May 2016 21:47:57 + as excerpted: > But, unless it's effectively an Ethernet connected router, so no > drivers, > I'll need to pick it up and install drivers and a wifi config before I > actually move, so I don't get stuck needing a connection to get the > drivers to

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Wifi adaptor recommendations

On 05/25/2016 12:47 AM, Duncan wrote: I could do either USB or PCIE card, tho I believe a PCIE connection's more robust, but OTOH, a USB connected device is more flexible in some ways. So recommendations? I have been using the AWUS036NHA with success and stability. Driver is ath9k_htc (in

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Wifi adaptor recommendations

Openwrt's build system is great. But as others have said running any non single purpose router at your edge has a lot of drawbacks. Not least that usable pcie wireless cards that work well in station mode are expensive. Whereas you can get the same chip in wifi router form for pennies AND you get

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Wifi adaptor recommendations

G not N. Rather, if you have G only (or b for that matter) it causes the old long and slow Legacy on air frame format to trigger. I wrote N meant G. -Joel On May 24, 2016 10:04 PM, "Joel Wirāmu Pauling" wrote: > N DOES NOT HELP at hotels. N over 2.4ghz forces ALL stations

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Wifi adaptor recommendations

N DOES NOT HELP at hotels. N over 2.4ghz forces ALL stations on that broadcast bandwidth (yes even those not participating) to downgrade to Legacy mode ( this behaviour is stupid, but that's what we get for backwards compatibility of mac80211 that should hace been abandonded after G for a complete

[gentoo-amd64] Re: Wifi adaptor recommendations

Mark Knecht posted on Tue, 24 May 2016 15:11:20 -0700 as excerpted: > Anyway, I guess if it was me I'd use the one you have short term while > at the hotel and then look at my house system when I landed someplace > permanent and try to go as fast as possible then. Bridge mode. Thanks. And

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Wifi adaptor recommendations

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > I'm moving at the end of the month. The city is buying out the property > and paying for movers, etc. They're actually supposed to give a 90-day > notice, but they want to move faster than that, so they're actually >

[gentoo-amd64] Wifi adaptor recommendations

I'm moving at the end of the month. The city is buying out the property and paying for movers, etc. They're actually supposed to give a 90-day notice, but they want to move faster than that, so they're actually paying to put me up in a nice short-stay hotel (3-star, Homewood Suites by

[gentoo-amd64] Re: simulating apt-get on gentoo

On 05/02/2016 07:00 PM, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote: > Sorry to come back to this. > I have a working ebuild, in the sense that I can install/remove using > emerge, however the NXT client crashes a few second after starting > with no error message. > I don't expect you to help with the crash. > > The

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: simulating apt-get on gentoo

Sorry to come back to this. I have a working ebuild, in the sense that I can install/remove using emerge, however the NXT client crashes a few second after starting with no error message. I don't expect you to help with the crash. The links you gave for Packages & the .deb file are still working

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: question mark status in eix

I am now. :) On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > why aren't you using eix-sync? > > 2016-04-29 8:43 GMT+02:00 Daiajo Tibdixious : >> >> Yeah eventually found that out. >> I have emerge --sync and eix-update in a cron job,

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: question mark status in eix

why aren't you using eix-sync? 2016-04-29 8:43 GMT+02:00 Daiajo Tibdixious : > Yeah eventually found that out. > I have emerge --sync and eix-update in a cron job, which hasn't been > running > (for unknown reasons, vixie cron is in startup and is running). > > On Fri, Apr 29,

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: question mark status in eix

Yeah eventually found that out. I have emerge --sync and eix-update in a cron job, which hasn't been running (for unknown reasons, vixie cron is in startup and is running). On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Jonathan Callen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash:

[gentoo-amd64] Re: question mark status in eix

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 04/26/2016 10:43 PM, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote: > Some products show [I] dev-libs/libdbus-qt while many others show > [?] dev-qt/qt-dbus > > I expect the [I] status for installed products, what does the ? > mean? I tried rebuilding the ones with

[gentoo-amd64] question mark status in eix

Some products show [I] dev-libs/libdbus-qt while many others show [?] dev-qt/qt-dbus I expect the [I] status for installed products, what does the ? mean? I tried rebuilding the ones with ? which didn't change it and revdep-rebuild didn't find anything. This seemed to start after the kde/plasma

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: simulating apt-get on gentoo

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote: > > Got src_install working except for mysterious (to me) problem: > src_install () { > into /opt > dobin usr/bin/runescape-launcher > > exeinto /opt/${PN} > doexe

[gentoo-amd64] Re: simulating apt-get on gentoo

Daiajo Tibdixious posted on Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:01:24 +1000 as excerpted: > I found (buy running with --debug) that its not running my changed > ebuild. > I had to do ebuild clean phase & run from the beginning each time to > make it see any changes. Yeah. Once you're working with ebuild, not

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: simulating apt-get on gentoo

I found (buy running with --debug) that its not running my changed ebuild. I had to do ebuild clean phase & run from the beginning each time to make it see any changes. On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote: > Got src_install working except for mysterious (to

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: simulating apt-get on gentoo

Got src_install working except for mysterious (to me) problem: src_install () { into /opt dobin usr/bin/runescape-launcher exeinto /opt/${PN} doexe usr/share/games/runescape-launcher/runescape insinto /opt/${PN} doins usr/share/games/runescape-launcher/runescape.png

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: simulating apt-get on gentoo

Thanks very much for that. I managed to get the fetch & unpack working, but nothing I tried for src_install worked, and your code is much neater than mine. On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Jonathan Callen wrote: > On 04/18/2016 10:11 PM, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote: >> dpkg has a

[gentoo-amd64] Re: simulating apt-get on gentoo

On 04/18/2016 10:11 PM, Daiajo Tibdixious wrote: > dpkg has a native gentoo version app-arch/dpkg but dpkg --unpack gave an > error. > However ar x worked fine. > Ended up with usr/bin/runescape-launcher which is fine, but also > usr/share stuff which I'll check for collisions. > (this is all in

[gentoo-amd64] Re: simulating apt-get on gentoo

Daiajo Tibdixious posted on Mon, 18 Apr 2016 22:40:08 +1000 as excerpted: > A package I wish to download has these instructions: > > wget -O - > http://content.runescape.com/a=946/downloads/ubuntu/runescape.gpg.key > | apt-key add - That, and each of the following, are effectively single

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: simulating apt-get on gentoo

dpkg has a native gentoo version app-arch/dpkg but dpkg --unpack gave an error. However ar x worked fine. Ended up with usr/bin/runescape-launcher which is fine, but also usr/share stuff which I'll check for collisions. (this is all in /var/tmp) Thanks very much, you saved me much trouble. Not

[gentoo-amd64] Re: simulating apt-get on gentoo

On 04/18/2016 08:49 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:40 AM, Daiajo Tibdixious > wrote: > >> A package I wish to download has these instructions: >> >> wget -O - >> http://content.runescape.com/a=946/downloads/ubuntu/runescape.gpg.key >> >> | apt-key add -

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >