On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/09/12 09:30, Michael Hampicke wrote:
You are right on; I disable Java in firefox and now can open links in
google search.
As I said, I have disabled cookies and javascript for goolge.de (using
cookiemonster an
I know this thread is a few weeks old but it is still highly related. I
found this:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/02/what-actually-changed-google%27s-privacy-policy
Maybe it ain't so bad after all. Someone posted it wasn't tho.
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said
On Jan 27, 2012 11:18 PM, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
wrote:
8 snippage
BTW, the Baidu spider hits my site more than all of the others combined...
Somewhat anecdotal, and definitely veering way off-topic, but Baidu was the
reason why my company decided to change our
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Jan 27, 2012 11:18 PM, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
wrote:
8 snippage
BTW, the Baidu spider hits my site more than all of the others combined...
Somewhat anecdotal, and definitely veering way
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Jan 27, 2012 11:18 PM, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
wrote:
8 snippage
BTW, the Baidu spider hits my site more
On Feb 8, 2012 10:57 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Jan 27, 2012 11:18 PM, Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com
I can not seem to open any link in Google search engine. I'm using firefox-9.0
Google search display the result but when I try to open it it doesn't work.
I don't have any plugin's installed
Proxy is set to no-proxy
By 2nd. backup computer as the same problem. Trying open any link from Google
Am 08.02.2012 19:24, schrieb Joseph:
I can not seem to open any link in Google search engine. I'm using
firefox-9.0
Google search display the result but when I try to open it it doesn't work.
I don't have any plugin's installed
Proxy is set to no-proxy
By 2nd. backup computer as the
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Feb 8, 2012 10:57 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On 02/08/12 19:28, Michael Hampicke wrote:
Am 08.02.2012 19:24, schrieb Joseph:
I can not seem to open any link in Google search engine. I'm using
firefox-9.0
Google search display the result but when I try to open it it doesn't work.
I don't have any plugin's installed
Proxy is set to
On Feb 9, 2012 1:35 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
On Feb 8, 2012 10:57 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:58:26AM -0700, Joseph wrote
You are right on; I disable Java in firefox and now can open links
in google search. This is getting strange. One day it is working
and next day it stops (I did not even installed anything).
Though, I do accept cookies selectively.
On 02/08/12 23:24, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:58:26AM -0700, Joseph wrote
You are right on; I disable Java in firefox and now can open links
in google search. This is getting strange. One day it is working
and next day it stops (I did not even installed anything).
Though,
Hi,
have you read googles privacy changes yourself?
I just did - and there is nothing new or unusual.
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Hi,
have you read googles privacy changes yourself?
I just did - and there is nothing new or unusual.
I read some more on it but I'm thinking about what will be coming next.
It seems when a company goes public like Google did a while back,
facebook is
On Sunday 29 Jan 2012 19:12:17 Dale wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Hi,
have you read googles privacy changes yourself?
I just did - and there is nothing new or unusual.
I read some more on it but I'm thinking about what will be coming next.
It seems when a company goes public
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 1/29/2012 02:47 PM, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 29 Jan 2012 19:12:17 Dale wrote:
As far as I can tell all that is changing with Google is they are going to
join up in terms of user authentication, hitherto separate portals or apps
they had. I do
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:38:15 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
To turn this on its head ... rather than hiding, is there a way to
create identical browsers that pollute their (google et al.) databases?
Considering the huge number a people using the likes of Google (and no
one has stated that
On Friday 27 Jan 2012 00:48:14 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 26 January 2012 21:29:05 Alan McKinnon wrote:
I've been contacted, and interviewed by phone, by Google TWICE. Both
times the person said straight up they read gentoo-users shrug
I was contacted too, but I think they were
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:21:16 +, Mick wrote:
Don't take it personally. On counter-interviewing the interviewer I
came to the conclusion that she was looking for young IT literate
candidates with networking and security knowledge, who would be keen to
work for Google at a (relatively) low
On Friday 27 Jan 2012 12:31:50 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:21:16 +, Mick wrote:
Don't take it personally. On counter-interviewing the interviewer I
came to the conclusion that she was looking for young IT literate
candidates with networking and security knowledge, who
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:59:34 +, Mick wrote:
My contact was interested in someone with experience in high
performance clusters. Can anyone point to a post of mine, here or
anywhere else, that implies that my knowledge of clustering extends
beyond being able to spell it?
You're
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:31:50 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 12:21:16 +, Mick wrote:
Don't take it personally. On counter-interviewing the interviewer I
came to the conclusion that she was looking for young IT literate
candidates with networking and
Hello!
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:16:01 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have a better search tool? I don't like Yahoo either. I
do like froogle so that would be a bonus. You know, shopping tool.
Thoughts? Suggestions?
What about Yandex? It provides a search tool and
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Graham Murray gra...@gmurray.org.uk wrote:
James Broadhead jamesbroadh...@gmail.com writes:
I wouldn't find it at all surprising if gentoo systems came out pretty
unique; no standard set of fonts, for example.
So maybe if you change your fonts regularly it
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 8:48 AM, v...@ukr.net wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:16:01 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have a better search tool? I don't like Yahoo either. I
do like froogle so that would be a bonus. You know, shopping tool.
Thoughts?
Am 27.01.2012 07:57, schrieb Dale:
Dale wrote:
Hi list,
I ran across this news item about Google:
http://alturl.com/s7xi5
The long URL is below. I'm sort of getting to where I don't like Google
since they seem to be doing things that I'm just not comfy with. Next
they will want a
On Thu, January 26, 2012 8:16 am, Dale wrote:
Hi list,
I ran across this news item about Google:
http://alturl.com/s7xi5
The long URL is below. I'm sort of getting to where I don't like Google
since they seem to be doing things that I'm just not comfy with. Next
they will want a camera
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com writes:
Hi list,
I ran across this news item about Google:
http://alturl.com/s7xi5
The long URL is below. I'm sort of getting to where I don't like Google
since they seem to be doing things that I'm just not comfy with. Next
they will want a camera on my rig
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 01:16:01AM -0600, Dale wrote
I'm sort of getting tired of switching emails every time I switch ISPs
or there is a policy change. That is why I switched to gmail in the
first place. No matter what ISP I use, I can still use Gmail. Yet,
here I am again.
Years ago,
On Thursday 26 Jan 2012 08:48:28 Michael Mathurin wrote:
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com writes:
Hi list,
I ran across this news item about Google:
http://alturl.com/s7xi5
The long URL is below. I'm sort of getting to where I don't like Google
since they seem to be doing things that
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:07:51 +, Mick wrote:
BTW, it seems to me that if you access youtube and at the same time
search Google without being logged in to any of their portals, they
will not be tracking your email for user profiling purposes. They may
be logging IP addresses but it could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/26/2012 08:16 AM, Dale wrote:
Hi list,
I ran across this news item about Google:
http://alturl.com/s7xi5
The long URL is below. I'm sort of getting to where I don't like
Google since they seem to be doing things that I'm just not
On Thursday 26 Jan 2012 11:33:14 Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:07:51 +, Mick wrote:
BTW, it seems to me that if you access youtube and at the same time
search Google without being logged in to any of their portals, they
will not be tracking your email for user profiling
Dale - I've been using Fastmail since 2005. Absolutely no issues at all.
I do pay for the enhanced account.
Good luck
festus
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012, at 01:16 AM, Dale wrote:
Hi list,
I ran across this news item about Google:
http://alturl.com/s7xi5
The long URL is below. I'm sort of
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:56:49 +, Mick wrote:
They can track a lot more than IP addresses, your browser can provide
a lot of information, not just user-agent but installed fonts, plugin
information and much more. There is enough to do a damn good job of
identifying you even when your IP
John J. Foster wrote:
Dale - I've been using Fastmail since 2005. Absolutely no issues at all.
I do pay for the enhanced account.
Good luck
festus
Do they allow encrypted messages too? I looked at the help pages and
I'm pretty sure it does.
Thanks.
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only
There is actually a huge amount of information available, giving a high
level of pseudo-uniqueness. There was a web site that showed you how
much it could glean from even an anonymous session, but I can't remember
where is was. Somewhere like the EFF.
I guess you mean
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Michael Hampicke gentoo-u...@hadt.biz wrote:
There is actually a huge amount of information available, giving a high
level of pseudo-uniqueness. There was a web site that showed you how
much it could glean from even an anonymous session, but I can't remember
On Thursday 26 Jan 2012 13:50:46 Neil Bothwick wrote:
Not that Google's profiling of individual's information is that hot
anyway. Last year they approached me about a job for which I am
completely unqualified - and not just because it meant getting out of bed
before 9am :-O
Ha, ha! A very
Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Michael Hampicke gentoo-u...@hadt.biz
wrote:
There is actually a huge amount of information available, giving a high
level of pseudo-uniqueness. There was a web site that showed you how
much it could glean from even an anonymous session,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Michael Hampicke gentoo-u...@hadt.biz
wrote:
There is actually a huge amount of information available, giving a high
level of pseudo-uniqueness. There was a web site that
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:12:43 +, Mick wrote:
Not that Google's profiling of individual's information is that hot
anyway. Last year they approached me about a job for which I am
completely unqualified - and not just because it meant getting out of
bed before 9am :-O
Ha, ha! A very
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:05:25 +0100, Michael Hampicke wrote:
There is actually a huge amount of information available, giving a
high level of pseudo-uniqueness. There was a web site that showed you
how much it could glean from even an anonymous session, but I can't
remember where is was.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012, at 07:59 AM, Dale wrote:
John J. Foster wrote:
Dale - I've been using Fastmail since 2005. Absolutely no issues at all.
I do pay for the enhanced account.
Good luck
festus
Do they allow encrypted messages too? I looked at the help pages and
I'm pretty
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:05:25 +0100, Michael Hampicke wrote:
There is actually a huge amount of information available, giving a
high level of pseudo-uniqueness. There was a web site that showed you
how much it could
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012, at 08:22 AM, John J. Foster wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012, at 07:59 AM, Dale wrote:
John J. Foster wrote:
Dale - I've been using Fastmail since 2005. Absolutely no issues at all.
I do pay for the enhanced account.
Good luck
festus
Do they allow
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:34:56AM -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
I guess you mean https://panopticlick.eff.org/
My results from work:
Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 1,939,102 tested
so far.
Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:59:57AM -0600, Dale wrote:
John J. Foster wrote:
Dale - I've been using Fastmail since 2005. Absolutely no issues at all.
I do pay for the enhanced account.
Good luck
festus
Do they allow encrypted messages too? I looked at the help pages and
I'm
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess you mean https://panopticlick.eff.org/
My results from work:
Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 1,939,102 tested so
far.
Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:34:56AM -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
I guess you mean https://panopticlick.eff.org/
My results from work:
Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 1,939,102 tested
so
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess you mean https://panopticlick.eff.org/
My results from work:
Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 1,939,102
Within our dataset of visitors, one in 0 browsers have the same
fingerprint as yours.
Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that
conveys INF bits of identifying information.
I think I broke it. I win? :)
Sweet, panopticlick.eff.org got gentoo'd :)
On Thursday 26 Jan 2012 16:04:45 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:34:56AM -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
I guess you mean https://panopticlick.eff.org/
My results from work:
Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique among the 1,939,102
tested so far.
On 26 January 2012 16:18, Michael Hampicke gentoo-u...@hadt.biz wrote:
Within our dataset of visitors, one in 0 browsers have the same
fingerprint as yours.
Currently, we estimate that your browser has a fingerprint that
conveys INF bits of identifying information.
I think I broke
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
The long URL is below. I'm sort of getting to where I don't like Google
since they seem to be doing things that I'm just not comfy with. Next
they will want a camera on my rig so they can watch me surf.
To be honest, I already
Me, I use Chromium for using social media sites or Google services
that I want to log-in to. Google+, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn. I
don't use it for anything else.
I use Firefox for everything else. I am not logged into any of those
services in Firefox. I use RequestPolicy to block all
On Thursday 26 Jan 2012 17:11:39 Lorenzo Bandieri wrote:
Me, I use Chromium for using social media sites or Google services
that I want to log-in to. Google+, Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn. I
don't use it for anything else.
I use Firefox for everything else. I am not logged into any of
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Lorenzo Bandieri
lorenzo.bandi...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe slightly OT, but what do gentoo-users think about Tor?
As an anonymising proxy, in my opinion, I consider it to be the most
hostile network one could ever use. I would only use Tor from within a
virtual
Am 26.01.2012 11:07, schrieb Mick:
On Thursday 26 Jan 2012 08:48:28 Michael Mathurin wrote:
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com writes:
Hi list,
I ran across this news item about Google:
http://alturl.com/s7xi5
The long URL is below. I'm sort of getting to where I don't like Google
since they
From: Frank Steinmetzger [mailto:war...@gmx.de]
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 11:05 AM
This backs me up in using noscript and flashblock. Sometimes I doubt
myself
when I get asked once more why I would use NoScript in times when most of
the web relies on JS. I then say that privacy and
On Thursday 26 Jan 2012 18:09:16 Florian Philipp wrote:
This made me thinking: Does anyone out there use different browsers for
different services? Like using Chrome only for GMail, Youtube and G+,
Opera for Facebook and Firefox for normal browsing?
Yes, I use Chromium --incognito to check
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 26 Jan 2012 18:09:16 Florian Philipp wrote:
This made me thinking: Does anyone out there use different browsers for
different services? Like using Chrome only for GMail, Youtube and G+,
Opera for Facebook and
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday 26 Jan 2012 18:09:16 Florian Philipp wrote:
This made me thinking: Does anyone out there use different browsers for
different services? Like
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:16, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Michael Hampicke gentoo-u...@hadt.biz
wrote:
There is actually a huge amount of information available, giving a high
level of pseudo-uniqueness. There was a web site that
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:52:47 -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
I guess you could achieve the same using different user profiles. For
example `firefox --no-remote -P google` and `firefox --no-remote -P
default`.
Ha! I didn't know that FF can handle different profiles! I better
read on this
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 15:12:39 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:12:43 +, Mick wrote:
Not that Google's profiling of individual's information is that
hot anyway. Last year they approached me about a job for which I
am completely unqualified - and
My first reaction was, why would Google need a CV from me, surely they
already know more about me than my mother does? Clearly they don't.
Of course they do! They just wanted you to confirm what they know about
you. Who knows, maybe you lied when you posted a story on facebook where
you told
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:47:18 +0100, Michael Hampicke wrote:
My first reaction was, why would Google need a CV from me, surely they
already know more about me than my mother does? Clearly they don't.
Of course they do! They just wanted you to confirm what they know about
you. Who knows,
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 07:59:57AM -0600, Dale wrote:
John J. Foster wrote:
Dale - I've been using Fastmail since 2005. Absolutely no issues at all.
I do pay for the enhanced account.
Good luck
festus
Do they allow encrypted messages too? I looked at the help
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 11:14 -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:34:56AM -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
I guess you mean https://panopticlick.eff.org/
My results from work:
Your browser
On Thursday 26 January 2012 21:29:05 Alan McKinnon wrote:
I've been contacted, and interviewed by phone, by Google TWICE. Both
times the person said straight up they read gentoo-users shrug
I was contacted too, but I think they were swayed by my sig. Anyway, no
further contact once I told
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 7:38 PM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 11:14 -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:34:56AM -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
I guess you mean
James Broadhead jamesbroadh...@gmail.com writes:
I wouldn't find it at all surprising if gentoo systems came out pretty
unique; no standard set of fonts, for example.
So maybe if you change your fonts regularly it might not be able to
track you - thinking that you are actually multiple
Dale wrote:
Hi list,
I ran across this news item about Google:
http://alturl.com/s7xi5
The long URL is below. I'm sort of getting to where I don't like Google
since they seem to be doing things that I'm just not comfy with. Next
they will want a camera on my rig so they can watch me
Hi list,
I ran across this news item about Google:
http://alturl.com/s7xi5
The long URL is below. I'm sort of getting to where I don't like Google
since they seem to be doing things that I'm just not comfy with. Next
they will want a camera on my rig so they can watch me surf. I found a
on my partial ~amd64 system, I have googletalk-plugin installed, and
it serves me well. On my new box (also partial ~amd64, but far more in
the stable realm than unstable realm), I tried to emerge
googletalk-plugin, and it's masked. It's also a '' version
package. I vaguely recall that ''
Michael Mol wrote:
on my partial ~amd64 system, I have googletalk-plugin installed, and
it serves me well. On my new box (also partial ~amd64, but far more in
the stable realm than unstable realm), I tried to emerge
googletalk-plugin, and it's masked. It's also a '' version
package. I
On Tuesday 29 Nov 2011 14:26:17 Dale wrote:
Michael Mol wrote:
on my partial ~amd64 system, I have googletalk-plugin installed, and
it serves me well. On my new box (also partial ~amd64, but far more in
the stable realm than unstable realm), I tried to emerge
googletalk-plugin, and it's
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) 张恩鸣 of
Singapore space.time.unive...@gmail.com wrote:
Article: Google Warns of China Exit Over Hacking
Link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126333757451026659.html
Nice to be back in January and OT ;)
I don't think it is
Article: Google Warns of China Exit Over Hacking
Link: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126333757451026659.html
I don't think it is that easy to hack if you are using SSL connections
and very strong passwords. How long would it take supercomputers to
perform a brute force attack if you are
Hi All!
I tried to emerge google earth / both from x86 and ~x86 and I have
32 bit cpu /, and it completed successfully but when I ran the program
it complain about could not access to the GPU or the card has not
enough memory to run GE, but it has because the minimum is 16 and it
has 128 Mb
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 11:56 +0100, Zoltán Füves wrote:
Hi All!
I tried to emerge google earth / both from x86 and ~x86 and I have
32 bit cpu /, and it completed successfully but when I ran the program
it complain about could not access to the GPU or the card has not
enough memory to run
I have the same problem (on amd64): using the radeon or radeonhd driver
you don't have 3D acceleration, and it seems googleearth detects this
somehow :(
yes unfortunately same problem on other platforms :( but I use the
adi-drivers fglrx module to use 3D acc.
thanks.
Z.
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 16:12 +0100, Zoltán Füves wrote:
I have the same problem (on amd64): using the radeon or radeonhd driver
you don't have 3D acceleration, and it seems googleearth detects this
somehow :(
yes unfortunately same problem on other platforms :( but I use the
adi-drivers
Am Tuesday 17 March 2009 15:45:00 schrieb Daniel Troeder:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 11:56 +0100, Zoltán Füves wrote:
Hi All!
I tried to emerge google earth / both from x86 and ~x86 and I have
32 bit cpu /, and it completed successfully but when I ran the program
it complain about could
This bug is bigger than I expect :)
I emerged ati-drivers 8.582 seems like without error
and amdcccle report a very similar output: no ati driver present or it
not configured properly, but fglrx module present glxgears run without
error and other opengl apps run good :)
fglrxinfo shows ati
2006/6/15, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A shame it's binary-only, so it won't run on everything that runs Linux.
Yes, it is, of course. But I think, google will never open the source
because of its policy.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,yesterday I read that Google Earth had been released. I
did an emerge and everything worked as expected - except the speed, but
the graphic driver is to blame (missing OpenGL support). So why is
Google Earth masked?
Has anyone any problems with Google Earth?Nico Schümann
On Thursday, 15 June 2006 21:31, Nico Schümann wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I read that Google Earth had been released. I did an emerge and
everything worked as expected - except the speed, but the graphic driver is
to blame (missing OpenGL support). So why is Google Earth masked?
Has anyone any
2006/6/15, Nico Schümann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,yesterday I read that Google Earth had been released. I
did an emerge and everything worked as expected - except the speed, but
the graphic driver is to blame (missing OpenGL support). So why is
Google Earth masked?
Has anyone any problems with Google
2006/6/15, 员旭鹏 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
try load glx module in /etc/X11/xorg.conf：Section Module Load glx Load extmod
Load xtrap Load record Load dbe Load dri Load freetype Load type1EndSection
glx is already loaded.Section Module Load vnc Load dbe Load extmod Load record Load xtrap
Load glx Load dri
On 6/15/06, Nico Schümann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/6/15, 员旭鹏 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
try load glx module in /etc/X11/xorg.conf：
Section Module
Load glx
Load extmod
Load xtrap
Load record
Load dbe
Load dri
Load freetype
Load type1
EndSection
On Thursday 15 June 2006 14:01, Nico Schümann wrote:
So why is Google Earth masked?
Has anyone any problems with Google Earth?
It is not hard masked it just isn't in stable. It is a beta version and it has
been in the tree for only 3 days. It probably won't become stable before
Google
On Thursday 15 June 2006 07:01, Nico Schümann wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I read that Google Earth had been released. I did an emerge and
everything worked as expected - except the speed, but the graphic driver is
to blame (missing OpenGL support). So why is Google Earth masked?
Has anyone any
On 6/15/06, Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 15 June 2006 07:01, Nico Schümann wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I read that Google Earth had been released. I did an emerge and
everything worked as expected - except the speed, but the graphic driver is
to blame (missing OpenGL support). So why
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:27:50 -0500, Aaron wrote:
I am running google earth without any problems. Its cool that they
finally came out with a Linux version.
A shame it's binary-only, so it won't run on everything that runs Linux.
--
Neil Bothwick
.sig a .sog of sixpence.
signature.asc
bugger i didn't even know there was an ebuild, i simply downloaded and
installed.
I'll back that out now and use the ebuild.
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:01:35 +0200
Nico Schümann wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I read that Google Earth had been released. I did an emerge and
everything worked as expected
I've just tried to install google earth and got the following:
Calculating dependencies ... done!
Emerging (1 of 1) x11-misc/googleearth-4_beta to /
checking ebuild checksums ;-)
checking auxfile checksums ;-)
checking miscfile checksums ;-)
checking GoogleEarthLinux.bin ;-)
Unpacking
Hi there,
Does exist any way of installing Google Earth/Picasa into amd64 ?
Thanx.
--
A la vista de suficientes ojos todos los errores resultan evidentes -
Linus Torvalds
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
101 - 200 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
