Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: modules reassigned

2009-05-24 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> If on the contrary you need to contract out the work to someone >> else, well, that requires direct contact with a company >> providing support... hmm... I can't find the GeoTools >> commercial support page.. oh, there it is, quite >> hidden I'd say: >> http://docs.codeh

[Geotools-devel] Module cleanup, reassignment report, one week later

2009-05-24 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, I went though the list of modules to be reassigned and made a list of the modules that still haven't been (partly or fully) reassigned: demo/mappane-use -> mbedward modules/library/coverage -> simboss (done), mbedward (nope) modules/library/metadata -> jgarnett (not maintainer?) modules/plugin

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk #1620

2009-05-24 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1620/changes Changes: [aaime] Removing openoffice related modules as per module cleanup thread on the ml [aaime] Removing dummy jaxb dependency [aaime] Removing the dummy directory, it's empty now [aaime] Removing build/dummy/jaxb as per

[Geotools-devel] Hudson build is back to normal: geotools-trunk #1621

2009-05-24 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1621/changes -- Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet t

Re: [Geotools-devel] Module cleanup, reassignment report, one week later

2009-05-24 Thread Michael Bedward
Hi Andrea, Many thanks for all of the thought, time and effort that you've put into the cleanup. Regarding these two... > demo/mappane-use -> mbedward > modules/unsupported/mappane -> mbedward (not module maint.) I've been working on the idea of bundling the unsupported mappane module into a bet

Re: [Geotools-devel] Module cleanup, reassignment report, one week later

2009-05-24 Thread Andrea Aime
Michael Bedward ha scritto: > Hi Andrea, > > Many thanks for all of the thought, time and effort that you've put > into the cleanup. > > Regarding these two... >> demo/mappane-use -> mbedward >> modules/unsupported/mappane -> mbedward (not module maint.) > > I've been working on the idea of bund

Re: [Geotools-devel] Module cleanup, reassignment report, one week later

2009-05-24 Thread Michael Bedward
Hi Andrea > The plan sounds good, +1 from me to proceed that way. > Right now I don't have time to look into the branch but I'll try to do > that later. > Cheers. I'll give the others a few days to respond if they want to and, if no one has any major objections, I'll go ahead. >> But I think I r

Re: [Geotools-devel] Module cleanup, reassignment report, one week later

2009-05-24 Thread Andrea Aime
Michael Bedward ha scritto: > Hi Andrea > >> The plan sounds good, +1 from me to proceed that way. >> Right now I don't have time to look into the branch but I'll try to do >> that later. >> > > Cheers. I'll give the others a few days to respond if they want to > and, if no one has any major obje

[Geotools-devel] Module cleanup: removed modules status

2009-05-24 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, I went thought the list of modules scheduled to be removed, and removed those that did not find any objection (as in, not even the slightest), in particular: build/dummy/jaxb build/maven/archetype (thx Jody) build/maven/build-configs (thx Justin) build/maven/javamaker build/maven/unopkg build/

[Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk #1626

2009-05-24 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1626/changes Changes: [jive] remove tile and repository [jive] grab the one unqiue code example from introduction; nice framework started shame it did not workout [jive] grab the correct colors for headers ---

[Geotools-devel] Hudson build is back to normal: geotools-trunk #1627

2009-05-24 Thread Hudson
See http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/1627/changes -- Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet t

[Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: xml-po not building, still out of the build

2009-05-24 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi Justin, I tried to put xml-po demo back in the build but... it does not build. The pom references a non existent "xsd" module, but even after replacing that with gt-xsd-core the module does not build due to some api changes. I guess the module has been out of the build long enough that it went

Re: [Geotools-devel] Modules cleanup: xml-po not building, still out of the build

2009-05-24 Thread Justin Deoliveira
Hi Andrea, Should be back to life now. Bring it back into the build whenever you are ready. -Justin Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi Justin, > I tried to put xml-po demo back in the build but... it > does not build. The pom references a non existent "xsd" > module, but even after replacing that with gt-

[Geotools-devel] Generating maven site, reports

2009-05-24 Thread Andrea Aime
Hi, I've been playing a bit trying to generate the maven site, which was reported as non buildable, and non fixable too. In fact, at the moment, the generation fails solid, or to be more precise, enters an infinite loop. I tracked that down to an interaction between javadoc aggregation and the si

Re: [Geotools-devel] Generating maven site, reports

2009-05-24 Thread Christian Müller
+1 for the reports. Especially the cobertura reports are useful for examining the test coverage. Concerning the build resources. I have to find a solution for the ibm hudson, perhaps we can run the "mvn site" on the ibm hudson box. Andrea Aime writes: > Hi, > I've been playing a bit try

Re: [Geotools-devel] Module cleanup: removed modules status

2009-05-24 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Ciao Andrea, just wanted to say thx for the report and for the good work. Simone. --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Owner - Software Engineer Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584983027 fax: +39 05849830

Re: [Geotools-devel] Module cleanup, reassignment report, one week later

2009-05-24 Thread Simone Giannecchini
Please, see below... --- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Owner - Software Engineer Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584983027 fax: +39 0584983027 mob:+39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solutions.it http:

Re: [Geotools-devel] Generating maven site, reports

2009-05-24 Thread Jody Garnett
I would find the site+reports valuable - building on a weekend would be fine (the code coverage report and javadocs both take a long time). Thanks for all the hard work exploring the issue andrea; very good detective work. Jody On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:24 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I've be

Re: [Geotools-devel] Module cleanup, reassignment report, one week later

2009-05-24 Thread Michael Bedward
Hi Simone, > Andrea is right. > I think that we should try to avoid the situation where someone "owns" > the code of coverage, I'd like to have a some critical mass working > with that codebase, exchanging ideas and bringing in different > perspectives for that module. > Since you are working a lo

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] IBM SDK 6 Hudson build Server

2009-05-24 Thread Jody Garnett
Christian you will find another thread as Andrea (and Michael?) work through the issues with the build/maven/javadoc module; I think we are close to being able to use the out of the box maven javadoc plugin now that it has an "aggregation" option. Bigger picture we should release our "build" artif

Re: [Geotools-devel] Module cleanup, reassignment report, one week later

2009-05-24 Thread Jody Garnett
> Excellent.  I'll warn the user list before I do it, although I have > the impression that no one there has been using the 2.6 code so far. We can help with that - I can cut a milestone release after this module migration is done (indeed I would like to). I would like to see what happens with jav

Re: [Geotools-devel] Module cleanup, reassignment report, one week later

2009-05-24 Thread Michael Bedward
Hi Jody, >> I propose that we merge this branch into trunk. The result would be >> that unsupported/mappane is removed and demo/mappane-use is replaced >> by demo/mapwidget. > > That sounds great :-) Excellent. I'll warn the user list before I do it, although I have the impression that no one th

Re: [Geotools-devel] Module cleanup, reassignment report, one week later

2009-05-24 Thread Jody Garnett
Morning all: > Regarding these two... >> demo/mappane-use -> mbedward >> modules/unsupported/mappane -> mbedward (not module maint.) > > I've been working on the idea of bundling the unsupported mappane > module into a better demo, as discussed a little while ago with you > and Jody. This work is i

[Geotools-devel] how to be organized

2009-05-24 Thread Michael Bedward
Hello all, As someone with a uni-tasking brain (at best) I've been looking for some way of keeping track of my ideas, tasks, problems etc. that is more effective than the scraps of paper and emails to myself that I usually rely on. I've just downloaded Freemind which looks like it might be useful

Re: [Geotools-devel] Module cleanup, reassignment report, one week later

2009-05-24 Thread Gabriel Roldan
Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I went though the list of modules to be reassigned and > made a list of the modules that still haven't been > (partly or fully) reassigned: > > demo/mappane-use -> mbedward > modules/library/coverage -> simboss (done), mbedward (nope) > modules/library/metadata -> jgarne

Re: [Geotools-devel] Module cleanup, reassignment report, one week later

2009-05-24 Thread Jody Garnett
Gabriel Roldan wrote: >> Btw, there is another cleanup I would like to make >> wise. Following suit Simone's example >> I would like to mark all non active developers >> are "Retired module developer" in the pom.xml >> Afaik the practice so far has just been to represent >> what is the current set

Re: [Geotools-devel] how to be organized

2009-05-24 Thread Jody Garnett
I usually find them fun for a couple weeks and then forget about them; the only one I used longer had an offline viewer application for a palm pilot :-) I asked around and a couple people at work use FreeMind. Please note you are also welcome to use Jira - at least for the GeoTools ideas, task

Re: [Geotools-devel] how to be organized

2009-05-24 Thread Michael Bedward
Yes, probably the most likely outcome for me too but I'll give it a go. I've yet to explore all that Jira can be used for, but I wouldn't want to pollute it with the sort of personal minutiae that I had in mind :) Michael 2009/5/25 Jody Garnett : > I usually find them fun for a couple weeks and

Re: [Geotools-devel] how to be organized

2009-05-24 Thread Christian Müller
I had to use it for some exercises during my GIS study the last two years. I think for people needing a picture it is a good way of ordering their thoughts. The software is easy to use and (important for me) runs on linux. The intension is to visualize and organize your ideas. What you will r

Re: [Geotools-devel] Module cleanup, reassignment report, one week later

2009-05-24 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Gabriel Roldan wrote: >>> Btw, there is another cleanup I would like to make >>> wise. Following suit Simone's example >>> I would like to mark all non active developers >>> are "Retired module developer" in the pom.xml >>> Afaik the practice so far has just been to repr

Re: [Geotools-devel] Module cleanup, reassignment report, one week later

2009-05-24 Thread Christian Müller
Hi Andrea, thanks for acting as a "vacuum cleaner". This makes the whole project a little bit easer to understand for newbies like me :-) If you run out of resources for the module owners, I could offer to assist ore even take ownership of one additional module, provided that I have some basic