Hi Brian,
So on December 1st, the 50% discount for front-instances is gone. The
idea is to compensate by switching to Python 2.7 with multithreading,
but it looks like at this point it's a lose-lose situation: it runs
more requests at the same time, but they take longer. We're mid-
the payment change 1 more month to January 1st 2012
wouldn't hurt :)
On Nov 12, 10:09 pm, Brian Quinlan bquin...@google.com wrote:
Hi Pol,
Thanks for getting back to me.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Pol p...@everpix.net wrote:
Hi Brian,
threadsafe is true
There is a known issue
a native Python implementation of the py-bcrypt
package from http://www.mindrot.org/projects/py-bcrypt/; grabbed from
here: https://github.com/erlichmen/py-bcrypt.
So what's happening here and how can we fix this?
Thanks,
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hi Brian,
threadsafe is true
Here's an example password_hash for an original 8 characters password:
$2a$04$cbM2uHwDphIG3jFFRpq1mui5aVjevnDUwhvQ77S/WG/qvJMpiXAL6
On Nov 12, 6:58 pm, Brian Quinlan bquin...@google.com wrote:
Hi Pol,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Pol p...@everpix.net wrote
: google.appengine.ext.mapreduce.application
login: admin
Thanks for your help!
On Nov 11, 1:26 pm, Brian Quinlan bquin...@google.com wrote:
Hi Pol,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Pol p...@everpix.net wrote:
Indeed the problem is the parsing of app.yaml:
- url: /mapreduce(/.*)? script: $PYTHON_LIB/google/appengine/ext
? Looking into the SDK
source, these extensions are not 2.7 multithreaded ready.
On Nov 10, 6:10 pm, Brian Quinlan bquin...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Pol p...@everpix.net wrote:
Hi,
What are the plans to get these 2 extensions compatible with Python
2.7 multithreaded
Ah OK it works, thanks. Didn't know had to replace path entirely...
Was wondering about compatibility since there were still some CGI
leftovers in these files.
On Nov 11, 1:26 pm, Brian Quinlan bquin...@google.com wrote:
Hi Pol,
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Pol p...@everpix.net wrote
Hi,
What are the plans to get these 2 extensions compatible with Python
2.7 multithreaded?
$PYTHON_LIB/google/appengine/ext/mapreduce/main.py
$PYTHON_LIB/google/appengine/ext/ereporter/report_generator.py
Thanks,
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
the majority fails and so on.
So how can we configure a task queue to have a very high rate *but*
prevent it to get to this rate too fast? I noticed the bucket size
parameter, but I'm not sure how to use it properly.
Thanks,
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
in queue.yaml/xml
This is documented for Java, but the same general rules apply for Python or
Go
applications.http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/config/queue.html#Defining...
Nick Verne
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Pol p...@everpix.net wrote:
Hi,
Through a task queue, we
the initial errors
but at least you'll get the queues cleared eventually.
Jeff
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Pol p...@everpix.net wrote:
Sorry, I realize I didn't explain everything: since the external
system can handle an arbitrary load (as long as this load doesn't grow
too fast
That's great news, but I'm wondering: if we put GAE over SSL on
https://example.com, will doing AJAX from https://www.example.com to
https://example.com still be considered cross-domain or not?
On Oct 18, 9:22 am, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote:
+1 to this!
I *do* need it... because
That's great news, but I'm wondering: if we put GAE over SSL on
https://example.com, will doing AJAX from https://www.example.com to
https://example.com still be considered cross-domain or not?
On Oct 18, 9:22 am, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote:
+1 to this!
I *do* need it... because
That's great news, but I'm wondering: if we put GAE over SSL on
https://example.com, will doing AJAX from https://www.example.com to
https://example.com still be considered cross-domain or not?
On Oct 18, 9:22 am, Jeff Schnitzer j...@infohazard.org wrote:
+1 to this!
I *do* need it... because
size? What are
these exact limits?
Thanks,
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr
Can anyone comment from Google comment on this 2nd point: write limits
on entire transaction? Our entities are 4KB on average so I'm trying
to track down what's happening but debugging on the server in a live
product is really not trivial.
On Oct 14, 12:25 pm, Simon Knott knott.si...@gmail.com
Hi,
I just saw some cases of run_in_transaction() throwing an exception
date value out of range. What does this mean and how do I prevent
this?
Thanks,
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send
self.check_rpc_success(rpc)
File /base/python_runtime/python_lib/versions/1/google/appengine/
datastore/datastore_rpc.py, line 1182, in check_rpc_success
raise _ToDatastoreError(err)
BadRequestError: The referenced transaction has expired or is no
longer valid.
- Pol
--
You received
Hi,
Datastore Statistics do include the extra Metadata for entities, so
where are these mysterious 3.69GB coming from??
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine
Hi,
Several times a day we get some ApplicationError: 2 exceptions when
communicating from GAE to EC2 through urlfetch(). How do I get more
info to understand exactly what's happening? I don't see anything
extra in the log and I'm not sure there's more info on the exception
object itself.
...
: always
- url: /admin/.*
script: admin.py
login: admin
secure: always
- url: /
script: main.py
secure: never
- url: /register
script: main.py
secure: never
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group
www.everpix.net to
gae.everpix.net, right?
Thanks!
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr
:24 AM, Jon McAlister jon...@google.com wrote:
What's the app-id?
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Pol-Online i...@pol-online.net wrote:
Hi,
Because we are about to launch our app very soon, I increased the number
of idle instances from 1 to 5 yesterday and things looked correct
I typed too fast, I meant *max* idle instances in the Dashboard. Sorry
about the confusion.
That said, the description of the slider is not very clear: it's
called max which is correct from a billing perspective, but from a
functionality perspective, it really looks like you're setting the
, Pol i...@pol-online.net wrote:
Hi Jon,
Great!
everpix-alpha
I still see what appears to be the bug now and then, but I don't have
a reproducible case just waiting in a task queue anymore.
On Sep 7, 1:19 pm, Jon McAlister jon...@google.com wrote:
Hi Pol,
I think I have a change
.
Anyway, it looks like either the graph is wrong or the setting doesn't work, or
the definition of what the setting does is wrong, because clearly it not stable
at 5.
I just activated Always On to work around the issue, so now it's back to 3+1.
-Pol
Pol-Online
i
Oops looks like the image was stripped, you can see it here:
http://oi52.tinypic.com/12349hi.jpg
On Sep 11, 9:53 am, Pol-Online i...@pol-online.net wrote:
Hi,
Because we are about to launch our app very soon, I increased the number of
idle instances from 1 to 5 yesterday and things looked
on the perceived value of GAE is and
what a fair price for the service, but putting this type of service
together does require quite a bit of know how.
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email
Great to see the problem acknowledged, so why is the HDR line still
all green at http://code.google.com/status/appengine?
The HRD is having problems now (yes, not as bad pas a MS problems, but
that's beside the point as the expectancies have been officially
raised quite a bit for HRD),
+ 0.006; link:
http://everpix-alpha.appspot.com/_ah/stats/details?time=1315418651153
And the problem:
App Stats states that Photo.get(...) took 1574ms while inline
measurements show a much bigger 3.56s? Does App Stats ignore de-
serialization of the entity properties or something?
- Pol
--
You
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Pol i...@pol-online.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to optimize our Python app and have App Stats installed.
The code to measure (simplified):
query = db.GqlQuery(SELECT * FROM Event WHERE ANCESTOR IS :1
ORDER BY max_date DESC, self.user.key())
if cursor
Hi Jon,
Great!
everpix-alpha
I still see what appears to be the bug now and then, but I don't have
a reproducible case just waiting in a task queue anymore.
On Sep 7, 1:19 pm, Jon McAlister jon...@google.com wrote:
Hi Pol,
I think I have a change that will fix this, which should
difference in performance on AppEngine. Is
TextProperty just slow? It's just used to store a few hundred bytes of
EXIF as a repr()'d Python dict.
On Sep 7, 1:29 pm, Pol i...@pol-online.net wrote:
I don't know the exact count for this Photo.get(...) call but it can
be around 2,000.
If it's related
.
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options
: ?
max_concurrent_requests: N
Thanks,
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Reviving this thread... GAE team: can we get an official comment on
this really important issue? Thx
On Sep 2, 1:14 pm, Pol i...@pol-online.net wrote:
Our app has been on HRD since the beginning and indeed, the past few
days for the time ever, I saw some timeouts. To be clear, not timeouts
due
Talking abou this, what do you think of using bcrypt.hashpw(password,
bcrypt.gensalt())? I've read in a few places it was supposed to be a
good solution, but I discovered this morning that the AppEngine
version, having to be pure Python, changes the default log_round for
salt generation from 1024
This is really scary. I'm not so obsessed about the price increase as
this is something you can control, but if the HRD starts becoming
slower and slower, there's absolutely nothing you can do. According to
these official graphs, it's literally 2X slower than 1 year ago. I'm
OK with training some
is stable and there are no datastore
timeouts anymore. I am happy with the move.
On Sep 2, 11:15 am, Pol i...@pol-online.net wrote:
This is really scary. I'm not so obsessed about the price increase as
this is something you can control, but if the HRD starts becoming
slower and slower
From my experience, when these happens they don't happen once, but for
a continuous period of time say 15mn. So they appear to be
reproducible 100% during this period. If you provide an direct email
address people can use next time it happens, then the affected
developer can provide the app id and
, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like scheduler issues. Do you see a pending ms in the logs (expand
the entries)? Have you adjusted the scheduler knobs under app settings in
your app's dashboard?
Robert
On Jul 29, 2011 12:02 PM, Pol i...@pol-online.net wrote:
Hi
entity group.
Hope this helps clarifies some points.
Thanks much for your detailed answers indeed!
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe
/api/user_info 200 2446ms 35cpu_ms 0kb Mozilla/
5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/
5.0.1
As you can't see 5~23ms turned into 133~2446ms. What could possibly be
happening? The latency clearly comes from outside my handler's code.
Thanks for any help.
- Pol
On Jul 26, 9:40 pm, Jose Montes de Oca jfmontesde...@google.com
wrote:
Hi Pol,
What this meas is that even if a transaction throws an exception this does
not means the transaction failed, thats why you need to make your datastore
transaction idempotent. So if you retry a transaction because
I see two big problems here:
1) There appear to be absolutely no record, say in the dashboard, of
failed transactions that eventually succeeded or really failed. For
some type of apps, I could live with 1 in a million transaction
failure that may or may not be eventually successful, but I need to
the HTTP headers for web requests?
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr
server output ---
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more
Appears to be working again, indeed.
On Jul 28, 6:47 pm, Chris Copeland ch...@cope360.com wrote:
+1
Been happening the last 15 minutes or so.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Pol i...@pol-online.net wrote:
Anyone else observing? It's been failing for me for the last 20mn.
Google
. :)
For the record, I did end up finding a bug in my code that explained
the fact sometimes concurrent transactions with ancestor queries were
apparently returning stalled results.
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post
has possible
race conditions.
Same here: I was also assuming HR datastore + transaction + ancestor
queries (by definition since inside a transaction).
So is my code wrong or am I observing some very rare but expected race
conditions?
Thanks
- Pol
--
You received this message because you
transactions have been
committed and eventually will be applied successfully.
So if you get TransactionFailedError, to you need to execute the
transaction again or will it automatically be applied later?
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App
, please A HREF=http://
code.google.com/appengine/community.htmlreport/A your problem and
mention this error message and the query that caused it./h2
h2/h2
/body/html
--- end server output ---
- Pol
On Jul 17, 4:28 am, Tom Fishman tom.fish...@dishcrunch.com wrote:
App deployment has been failing
datastore if the entity key has no parent?
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr
~100ms.
Thanks,
- Pol
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more
, 1:35 am, Pol i...@pol-online.net wrote:
Hi,
Regarding expando properties:
1) Can you prevent them from being indexed (I couldn't find anything
about this, but I'd like official confirmation)?
2) What's the practical number of expando properties you shouldn't go
above
It's been a few days since the last message on this thread - just
making sure it doesn't fall through the cracks :)
On Jul 8, 9:06 pm, Pol i...@pol-online.net wrote:
Thanks for the slides, quite interesting - too bad there was no audio,
it would have helped even more.
So still, how are zig
Hi,
Regarding expando properties:
1) Can you prevent them from being indexed (I couldn't find anything
about this, but I'd like official confirmation)?
2) What's the practical number of expando properties you shouldn't go
above? If they are all indexed, then surely that can be quite
expensive,
://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine
Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Pol i...@pol-online.net wrote:
I'm a little confused by your answer and the concept of zigzag
joins. In practice, assuming the result set will end up being
Hi,
Assuming the app runs on an HR database and that the number of indexes
is not a problem:
Say that because of the data model, these queries are equivalent (i.e.
return the exact same results), which one should be used to get the
best performance?
query = db.GqlQuery(SELECT * FROM Photo WHERE
obvservations been?
Ikai Lan
Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine
Blog:http://googleappengine.blogspot.com
Twitter:http://twitter.com/app_engine
Reddit:http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Pol i...@pol-online.net wrote:
Hi,
Assuming the app
On Jul 1, 10:10 am, Ikai Lan (Google) ika...@google.com wrote:
It's possible for two operations to update townCache concurrently, but in
your case it looks like it doesn't really matter. If TownModel is somehow
updated between reads, it's theoretically possible for you to have an older
Hi,
On http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html, in the Requests
section, it says:
The total number of requests to the app. The per-minute quotas for
application with billing enabled allow for up to 500 requests per
second—more than one billion requests per month.
But further below, in
62 matches
Mail list logo
