edValue
> [ERROR] Line 22: GenerationType cannot be resolved
> [ERROR] Line 25: Table cannot be resolved to a type
> [ERROR] Line 25: The attribute name is undefined for the
> annotation type Table
> [ERROR] Line 26: NamedQueries cannot be resolved to a
ot be resolved
> [ERROR] Line 25: Table cannot be resolved to a type
> [ERROR] Line 25: The attribute name is undefined for the
> annotation type Table
> [ERROR] Line 26: NamedQueries cannot be resolved to a type
>
> On 2/21/11, l.denardo wrote:
>
&
GWT compiles your java source into javascript using a restricted
subset of allowed classes, and you cannot use anything built on non-
compatible classes, tipically you cannot read classes with persistence-
related annotatios.
Source code for your DTO must be accessible to thw GWT compiler. This
is
See comments by Ikai Lan in this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/dbebe4482008eb3e/b06fe2c1f7e69e1f?lnk=gst&q=+high+replication#b06fe2c1f7e69e1f
"...Robert, in future releases, we will allow developers to create
aliases for
their applications. Aliases a
Just a guess...
are you using GWT with development mode or similar frameworks?
In GWT, development mode (on the fly execution) and production mode
(compiled javascript) sometimes differ in layout details, such as
dimensions, float, HTML elements wraparound behavior.
If you don't try a compiled ver
See
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/3b8dccfe496550fc/3f4f1ae7d390af78?lnk=gst&q=north+american+data+centers#3f4f1ae7d390af78
Regards
Lorenzo
On Jan 12, 11:16 am, Maxim Veksler wrote:
> Can you please provide reference to this very important claim?
>
> On Tue,
Hello,
when I log in to appengine, only applications I created are shown.
Applications that I've been added as a developer don't show.
I guess this is due to the fact I was signed in in the same browser
with a Google Apps account: some of the authorizations were
transferred to my google apps acco
Also, local data seem to be cleared any time the dev server encounters
an error.
If you reload your server (or client) too many times (2-3 server, 8-10
gwt client) and you get a "perm gen space error" then your local data
will be cleared. This seems specific to 1.4.0.
Anyway, you can simply put th
really works?
> I want to achieve that a user can login to the app, logout and can
> login with a different account of the same domain (without being
> forced to clear the cache manually).
>
> On 6 Dez., 12:33, "l.denardo" wrote:
>
> > Logout works *for your app*. Thi
bit seems to be the logical conclusion from the directive not to
> show an intermediate login screen)
>
> Is this correct?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:28 AM, l.denardo wrote:
> > You can use the explicit addresses for OpenID
Logout works *for your app*. This means that your user is logged out
from your app, but must explicitly log out from his Google Account.
If the user comes back to your app while still being logged in to
Google and you accept login without any intermediate step, he will be
logged in again in your ap
You can use the explicit addresses for OpenID endpoints:
userService.createLoginURL(redirectTo, "gmail.com",
"https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id";, attributesRequest);
String appsLoginUrl = userService.createLoginURL(redirectTo,
loginDomain,
As far as I know you can use some workarounds:
*Use OpenID as an authentication option and accept as many providers
you can (usually Gmail, Google Apps, Facebook, Yahoo are used). This
will enlarge your user base.
*Just leave a demo page out of security constraint: you can serve
content to users w
I think (didn't try, but I'm planning to port an app to marketplace
too, so I'm investigating) that your universal navigation bar cannot
be manually upgraded.
The only way to do it is automatic, by submitting the app in the
marketplace (of course, paying the $100 fee). Then you can do test
installa
Do you mean you were able to read old (I mean created using 1.3.7)
data using 1.3.8?
For what I've tried (and read reports about) switching to 1.3.8 does
not show old data, but the local_bd.bin is left untouched, so simply
reverting to 1.3.7 will work.
Ikai Lan replied that this is a known issue t
To create new apps, just log in to google.com/appengine (add /a/
yourdomai.com for apps accounts) and you'll see a button to create
your new app.
If you need to reuse the same phone number for a different account
there's a manual verification form you can fill in at
https://appengine.google.com/w
A link to documentation on the matter:
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/tutorial/i18n.html#international
Regards
Lorenzo
On Oct 11, 10:22 am, Vibhuti Gupta wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am facing problem reading property file in GWT. I created an interface
> which extends the Constants inter
You may have better luck in GWT discussion groups...
Anyway it seems you're mixing Constants and Message annotations.
The correct way is
class Test extends Constants{
@DefaultStringValue("this is my alert!!")
public String displayAlert();
}
//use
public static Test constants = GWT.create(Test.cl
I guess this should be unique (otherwise API will be broken!!). Maybe
it's generated from the unique openID identifier.
I can surely state that for Google Apps users the ID is the same using
direct Google Apps login (application is "restricted to a Google Apps
domain you own") and OpenID.
I store
pp is the Youtube
> Direct Java app. The frontend is working. But I'm not even getting to
> the login screen.
>
> The log says this:
>
> com.google.inject.internal.FinalizableReferenceQueue$SystemLoader
> loadFinalizer: Not allowed to access system class loader.
>
&
Hello,
on local server you have a fake authentication which allows simulation
of admin login.
If you open your front end with your browser, you should see a login
box showing "t...@examle.com" as login name, with a "sign in as
administrator" checkbox.
You must sign in as admin if you want to see t
ne that gets reported as spam.
> Can you confirm? We created the new @google.com address to circumvent this
> issue.
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:42 PM, l.denardo wrote:
>
> > BTW I checked, and looks like messages are marked as spam only if
> > coming by the address
BTW I checked, and looks like messages are marked as spam only if
coming by the address
appengine.notificati...@google.com
In my inbox at least...appengine.noreply seems to go to inbox
correctly.
On Sep 15, 4:38 pm, "l.denardo" wrote:
> Happens randomly to me too.
> Yesterday fi
Happens randomly to me too.
Yesterday first announcement was "spam", subsequent update not. Emails
are marked as spam or phishing about 20% of times.
Regards
Lorenzo
On Sep 15, 11:46 am, "Raymond C." wrote:
> same here
>
> On Sep 15, 3:41 pm, Kenneth wrote:
>
> > Does anyone else get the downti
I hope that new background servers will be designed with the option to
enable multithreading for processing.
The reason is simply that many libraries (especially for
computationally intensive tasks involving things like branch-and.bound
tree search) are implemented using threads, and obviously thi
Hello,
these times are pretty usual for me (Italy) and seem to depend on the
number of files you need to compile and upload.
I just uploaded a test (nearly empty) app, no GWT, one servlet and one
page. That took about 30 seconds.
My business app has numbers like your. I work in Java.
The "cloning
Can you please clarify the steps to get that kind of login working? I
can't find documentation about this.
I tried the following:
*Use an app with "Google accounts API" as authentication option,
accessed thru appspot.com.
Going to http://myapp.appspot.com/a/mydomain.com/ gives access to
general G
That was my guess too.
Thank you for collaboration.
Regards
Lorenzo
On Aug 30, 3:32 pm, Rodrigo Moraes wrote:
> On Aug 30, 10:08 am, "l.denardo" wrote:
>
> > The point in my question is: does multitenancy impact performance when
> > user ID (or anything which
improve
performances, e.g., of getObjectByID?
The only thing I see by now is that it would reduce the size of the
*result sets* in case of queries on datastore, I would like to see how
this affects performances.
Thanks for your help
Lorenzo
On Aug 30, 2:30 pm, Rodrigo Moraes wrote:
> On Aug
Hello everybody,
I'm currently investigating the new multitenancy features introduced
in GAE 1.3.6.
In my application the only suitable namespace would be the user's
email domain (Google Apps domain btw), making the choice of
multitenancy nearly useless (I currently have security checks to
separat
ficial' domain
> account.
>
> If I understood correctly I can have an account
> domainow...@example.com own the domain, then have a d...@example.com
> own some apps, and have a product...@example.com own some other apps,
> and somehow both of these can use example.com
There are command lines for it.
See http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/tools/devserver.html
If you're using Eclipse, there's the Google Plugin which allows
starting and managing server from Eclipse.
If you need an emulation for JUnit testing, using only the services
you need on the fly,
wn the domain, then have a d...@example.com
> own some apps, and have a product...@example.com own some other apps,
> and somehow both of these can use example.com as their domain?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dre
>
> On Jul 30, 12:49 am, "l.denardo" wrote:
>
> > The accou
The account used for domain management has nothing to do with the ones
used for deploying.
You can have a team working on dev.appspot.com, mapped to your dev
subdomain, another one completely different working to production,
e.g. on prod.appspot.com mapped to your production subdomain, and let
you
Look into OpenID api.
It allows you to authenticate users using the same credential, and if
the user is signed in you can implement a good single sign on.
User data will anyway be handled separately by each application, since
datastore cannot be shared.
Links:
http://code.google.com/appengine/do
It's possible if these are supported. The page "will it play in app
engine" gives a compatibility list for them.
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/web/will-it-play-in-app-engine
Regards
Lorenzo
On Jul 25, 5:10 am, Aircule wrote:
> Through JVM implementations such as Quercus a
The listed behavior seems to work in production only.
I haven't been able to write output on standard streams in development
too.
Anyway you can simply log the required output with the appropriate log
level, and it will be prompted to your console if logging properties
are correctly set.
Regards
.. )
>
> we not just fetch logout url via ajax and create link.
>
> On Jul 12, 6:53 pm, "l.denardo" wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > I'm currently using openID for users authentication.
> > What I've done until now is to generate a logout link on server
Hello,
I'm currently using openID for users authentication.
What I've done until now is to generate a logout link on server side,
using the Users API.
Now I need to generate such URL on client side, to add a click
listener to it and automatically save user's work before sign out.
User service alwa
for all suggestions! I'll try to make it work...
>
> On the same note, does anyone know anything about
> this:http://smarterware.org/6394/google-apps-vs-google-accounts-resolution...
>
> Regards,
> Uros
>
> On Jul 5, 9:25 am, "l.denardo" wrote:
>
> &
You should use the Users API using the OpenID option.
Then you can log in both accounts passing different parameters to the
createLoginURL method
https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id -- >for gmail
https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/site-xrds?hd=$DOMAIN -->
substituting your domain nam
I agree the guide is well written and quite complete.
Many books on App Engine seem to be a replication of the guide with
different coding examples and a bit of added confusion :-)
I would also suggest conferences from Google IO at
http://code.google.com/events/io/2010/
http://code.google.com/eve
I think there's no way to do it.
Gmail names seem to be locked for anyone, including the owner of the
account. This happened to me too, and seems to be a frequent request
from many of us.
Regards
Lorenzo
On Jul 2, 9:03 pm, cwaldbieser wrote:
> I read that if you have a GMail account, no one else
sage that
> my GAE app receives.
>
> Thanks. Kyle
>
> On Jun 30, 10:53 am, "l.denardo" wrote:
>
> > Can you clarify what you're doing?
>
> > The following thing works correctly, anyway:
>
> > -Send the email using the Mail API setting
>
Can you clarify what you're doing?
The following thing works correctly, anyway:
-Send the email using the Mail API setting
* The user's address as the sender
* The intended address (e.g. "admins") as the receiver
When you receive the email at the destination address (e.g. your
address if you're
> Can someone also please tell me whether or not the index.yaml file
> plays a role in running the app on localhost or not. I cannot
> comprehend why the app (even the feature that needed that particular
> index) was working fine on localhost if the index.yaml was malformed
> and the same app brea
t
> versions.
>
> Section I added to web.xml:
>
>
>
>
> *
>
>
> CONFIDENTIAL
>
>
>
> On Jun 25, 1:13 am, "l.denardo" wrote:
>
> > The same in Java configuring web
Hello,
I think you could look at the suite for local testing introduced here:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/tools/localunittesting.html
You can ad entities and use the services as you would in the dev
server.
It's a bit long to configure but has given good results to me.
regards
Lor
The same in Java configuring web.xml as stated here:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/config/webxml.html#Secure_URLs
(on appspot.com only, not for custom apps domains)
Regards
Lorenzo
On Jun 25, 4:44 am, Robert Kluin wrote:
> If you are using python you can configure app.yaml to auto
I'm just giving a not-well-thought suggestion, but I'd rather use
memcache for this.
I guess something like using a time-dependent code as the key (i.e. a
counter which increments every 30 seconds) and a list of user ids as
the value, and simply doing a get() on the cache for the current
counter v
I did try this since I got the same warning (by the way I think it's a
Firefox issue, since I had disabled that kind of warnings in my
settings).
The result was an HTTPS error, stating parameters were too long to
process (I think it was due to the very long URLs generated by
redirections).
Sorry f
Thanks for your fast response.
I hope we will get more details in the future about these outages (I
guess this time it was big issue, since Google Docs reported a
BigTableOverQuotaException).
Maybe some more details added to downtime notifies will help
developers plan their use of App Engin and ap
Seems up again, even if apps have high response time.
On Jun 17, 12:46 pm, vivpuri wrote:
> Same for my app
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubsc
I'm currently facing (15m or so) 500 errors both in Administration
Console and all of my applications.
No announcements on downtime notify, system status shows 100% uptime
and no issue on Java (but anomalies in datastore and task queues).
Regards
Lorenzo
by the way also got errors from other Goo
equired?continue=http://myapp.appspot.com/Home.jsp]
Sorry for bad information about the issue
Lorenzo
On Jun 15, 11:26 am, Scott Ellis wrote:
> I think if you log out of your apps account, it should allow you to login
> again with whatever account you want.
>
> On 15 June 2010 19:15, l
Hello,
I'm currently facing an unattended behavior when using openID to
authenticate for an admin page.
My app uses openID to authenticate users: requests are correctly
redirected to _ah/login_required for requests on regular app address,
and I use a servlet to show a custom login page.
If I try
Hello,
Google announced a "business" version of AppEngine some time ago
http://code.google.com/appengine/business/
It's got an SLA which is published in draft at
http://code.google.com/appengine/business/sla.html
Prices for public apps are still not listed (and I guess it would take
quite a long
Hello,
I have an application deployed in GAE (Java) using Mail API.
The app is restricted in access to users from my Google Apps domain.
To receive feedback from users, I send from client (GWT + gwt
dispatch) an action containing a subject and message.
On server side I prepare an email message, set
That's what I was meaning...still my low-level English doesn't help to
explain :-)
What I did was to deploy a servlet in _ah/login_required, which
generated login URL (assuming Google as an openID provider) and
redirected to it using standard servlet redirection.
I had /* pattern in security-cons
I found the same error in Java: it's due to the way that login URL is
generated, which is different for pages with "required login" and
pages out of this constraint.
If a page is under security constraint login always redirects to _ah/
login_required, even if that is the uri you're requesting. Othe
logoutURL =
UserServiceFactory.getUserService().createLogoutURL(requestBase + "/
_ah/openid_logout?continue="+request.getRequestURI());
This handles automatic redirect correctly.
On May 28, 9:22 am, "l.denardo" wrote:
> Even worse, if the user does save the authorization for
.
Is there any workaround for this?
Thank you
Lorenzo
On May 27, 5:49 pm, "l.denardo" wrote:
> Hello,
> I managed starting openID authentication for my app on GAE.
>
> Login works correctly with gmail accounts if _ah/login_required is not
> under a security constraint i
Hello,
I managed starting openID authentication for my app on GAE.
Login works correctly with gmail accounts if _ah/login_required is not
under a security constraint in web.xml.
Then, I show the user a JSP page, Header.jsp listing user's email and
a logout link.
Generating logout link with
OpenID as an option.
Thank you again Vladimir
Lorenzo
On May 27, 9:39 am, "l.denardo" wrote:
> Thanks very much.
> So it seems a problem in my configuration, since I only have Google
> Apps in my authentcation options (both in Application Settings ->
> Authentication
> Application Settings -> Authentication Options -> (Experimental) Federated
> Login
>
> On 26 May 2010 15:41, l.denardo wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hello,
> > openID authentication does not seem to be active neither in the
> > "application settings" tab n
Hello,
openID authentication does not seem to be active neither in the
"application settings" tab nor when creating a new application.
The only available options are google accounts and google apps, not
switchable after the application has been created.
I wonder when new OpenID option will be avail
Hello,
I'm currently facing some problems using Appengine authentication and
GWT.
I built an application on Appengine which uses google login to
authenticate users and is currently deployed on a Google Apps domain
and restricted to users of that domain.
On client side I use GWT and use history toke
67 matches
Mail list logo
