No one?
Regards,
joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...
...now these points of data make a beautiful line...
Original Message
Subject: [H] nVidia video card until
From: joeu...@chronic.org
Date: Wed, July 09, 2014 10:24 am
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
I have
Upgrade to GTX 750 Ti because it's cheap frugal on trons and probably
better than those 460's. Cheers!
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 11:31:26 -0500, joeu...@chronic.org wrote:
No one?
Regards,
joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...
...now these points of data make a beautiful line...
] On Behalf Of Bobby Heid
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:44 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card survey
I just installed Win 7 on my machine. I have an Nvidia GeForce
GTX 285
graphics card that I have had for about 9 months now. This card
gives
me
7.4 for both
.
My disk sub-score is 7.9 with two Intel G2 SSDs. :)
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Bobby Heid
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:44 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card
14, 2010 3:01 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card survey
I'm curious Bobby, since you don't game what do you need a GTX 285 for.
Are you fold...@home or doing some Cuda stuff? My hard drive score is
4.8 and memory is 7.4 by the way.
On 1/13/2010 8:44 PM, Bobby Heid
...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Stan Zaske
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 3:01 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card survey
I'm curious Bobby, since you don't game what do you need a GTX 285 for.
Are you fold...@home or doing some Cuda stuff? My hard drive score is
4.8
. That was the biggest reason behind it.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Q. Martin
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 1:30 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card survey
Wow
One major disadvantage, you can't use TRIM on the drives and I'm
guessing the raid will increase latency a bit.
Eli
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Greg Sevart ad...@xfury.net wrote:
Yes. When I was weighing getting one 160GB G2 vs two 80GBs and stripe them,
I opted for the later since the
...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Stan Zaske
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:52 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card survey
Graphics and gaming graphics are both 7.1 which is not bad.
Unfortunately, I don't remember what the old 4850
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card survey
Graphics and gaming graphics are both 7.1 which is not bad.
Unfortunately, I don't remember what the old 4850 was so can't compare
the two. If you're looking for a 7.7 you'll need to step up to the 5850
or 5870 but what's
-score is 7.9 with two Intel G2 SSDs. :)
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Bobby Heid
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:44 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card survey
I just
PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card survey
Graphics and gaming graphics are both 7.1 which is not bad.
Unfortunately, I don't remember what the old 4850 was so can't compare
the two. If you're looking for a 7.7 you'll need to step up to the 5850
or 5870 but what's
Hello Stan,
Thursday, January 14, 2010, 2:29:22 PM, you wrote:
If I might
make a suggestion, why not try out a first person online shooter called
Left4Dead II. It's a lot of fun playing with people especially with a
mic so you can talk with each other.
Seconded.
--
Regards,
joeuser -
Hello Stan,
Thursday, January 14, 2010, 2:07:22 PM, you wrote:
I'm really enjoying my 5770. Acording to my Kill A Watt the idle power
went from 150 to 115 and loaded 235 to 205. Pretty good drop and a lot
faster to boot.
Well done.
--
Regards,
joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...
Hello Anthony,
Thursday, January 14, 2010, 2:15:22 PM, you wrote:
I think I'm going to install a gameso I can say I'm not going for
bragging rights trying to get my WEI graphic scores above 7. :)
Ok seriously... what's up with WEI. I see all this talk about it, it
cannot be that good of
It's called obsession, my friend!
On 1/14/2010 5:42 PM, Joe User wrote:
Hello Anthony,
Thursday, January 14, 2010, 2:15:22 PM, you wrote:
I think I'm going to install a gameso I can say I'm not going for
bragging rights trying to get my WEI graphic scores above 7. :)
Ok
-boun...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Bobby Heid
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:44 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card survey
I just installed Win 7 on my machine. I have an Nvidia GeForce GTX 285
graphics card that I
] On Behalf Of Eli Allen
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 10:25 AM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card survey
One major disadvantage, you can't use TRIM on the drives and I'm
guessing the raid will increase latency a bit.
Eli
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Greg
Hello Anthony,
Thursday, January 14, 2010, 5:09:07 PM, you wrote:
It's called obsession, my friend!
That answers that!
--
Regards,
joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key...
...now these points of data make a beautiful line...
LOL
On 1/14/2010 5:09 PM, Anthony Q. Martin wrote:
It's called obsession, my friend!
On 1/14/2010 5:42 PM, Joe User wrote:
Hello Anthony,
Thursday, January 14, 2010, 2:15:22 PM, you wrote:
I think I'm going to install a gameso I can say I'm not going for
bragging rights trying to get
...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Bobby Heid
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:44 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card survey
I just installed Win 7 on my machine. I have an Nvidia GeForce GTX
285
graphics card that I have had for about 9 months now. This card gives
Cooler with less power is good. What kind of WEI do you get under
Windows 7? I've been thinking of upgrading my Geforce 8800 GTS to
something, as this inexpensive Radeon HD 4670 is just a few clicks under
it on WEI (6.4 vs 6.9). I'd like to get above 7.0 on my home system.
Of course, going
Graphics and gaming graphics are both 7.1 which is not bad.
Unfortunately, I don't remember what the old 4850 was so can't compare
the two. If you're looking for a 7.7 you'll need to step up to the 5850
or 5870 but what's the point if you never game. Might as well stay with
what you have.
of SSDs. LOL.
Bobby
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Stan Zaske
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 4:52 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card survey
Graphics and gaming graphics
13, 2010 8:44 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card survey
I just installed Win 7 on my machine. I have an Nvidia GeForce GTX 285
graphics card that I have had for about 9 months now. This card gives
me
7.4 for both graphics scored.
My HD score is a lowly 5.9
...@hardwaregroup.com [mailto:hardware-
boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of Bobby Heid
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:44 PM
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card survey
I just installed Win 7 on my machine. I have an Nvidia GeForce GTX 285
graphics card that I have had
I had that problem with a small Nikon camera and MOV files.
I don't think VirtualDub will do that directly,
but if you get them out of the MOV format it will.
As in - transcode them to something else as-is (like AVI),
and then work on them with the built-in filters in VirtualDub.
(You need to
All along making them grainier and grainier!
No answer here but be sure to process them w/o compression until the end because I'll
bet they are already low-rez like my CP5700 creates and each re-compress is like
analog video tape with generations.
Rick Glazier wrote:
I had that problem
Agree. And I got rid of the MOV camera because it was too
dificult to work with the videos it took...
I use Fuji and Olympus waterproof cameras now and they store in AVI,
so the single compression WHILE turning is a single step process.
They basically look the same to me, but I'm NOT into HiDef
Usually on ATI's site they have one download link for the entire package and
a separate one for just the driver (at least for the Radeon drivers).
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:04 PM, DHSinclair dsinc...@bellsouth.net wrote:
My new system is running very well. Thank you.
Earlier today I went in
Drivers only: 13.3MB
driver + control Center: 34.7MB
http://game.amd.com/us-en/drivers_catalyst.aspx?p=xp/radeonx-xp
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of DHSinclair
Sent: 18 December 2008 22:04
To: Hardware
Brian,
That is what I expected also. I was able to dl a driver only for my
R4670 (building tonight!). For some odd reason, the only driver for the
R4350 is this 137MB file! Hopefully, this file just expands so I can
search this hotfix solution and find just the driver. Very odd, but not
...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of DHSinclair
Sent: 18 December 2008 23:08
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] ATI video drivers?
Brian,
That is what I expected also. I was able to dl a driver only for my
R4670 (building tonight!). For some odd reason, the only driver for the
R4350
lease_notes.pdf
:)
-Original Message-
From: hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com
[mailto:hardware-boun...@hardwaregroup.com] On Behalf Of DHSinclair
Sent: 18 December 2008 23:08
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] ATI video drivers?
Brian,
That is what I expected also. I was able to dl
: 18 December 2008 23:36
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] ATI video drivers?
Thanks, Neil.
I can not open the link you sent. 403 error.
Duncan
At 23:20 12/18/2008 +, you wrote:
The release notes for 8.12 I linked to has the R4350 listed as one of the
(many) cards it can handle
Hello,
Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 11:49:16 PM, I wrote:
Well, I figured out the performance thing. It seems to be something
with World Of Warcraft Catalyst 8.11 drivers. The 8.12 drivers to
be released within hours (12.10.08) is supposed to address this, at
least they did in the beta
Hello,
Sunday, December 7, 2008, 9:31:45 PM, I wrote:
Yeah I had that same issue. I figured it out and installing the
realtek hda 280 drivers seemed to fix it? it's not nagging for the
driver now and seems stable. I'm not getting the performance boost
like I thought I would though.
Well, I
JB,
The R4350 does not arrive with this adaptor from MSI. No bother. I have a
collection of same. Should I find a need to use the DVI connector, I can
use it (w/accepted loss of visual accuity!).
The R4350 does, however, have a small white socket hidden under the
heatsink at the lower rear
j,
I will truly accept your wisdom here, but, this MSI card just would not
re-boot w/o a nag msg about its' missing HD Audio Driver! Even after
upgrading to WinXPpro! I'm not certain what stopped the nag msgs ATM. It
was either to allow the install of the ATI HD Audio Driver, or, digging
Hello DHSinclair,
Sunday, December 7, 2008, 3:36:32 PM, you wrote:
j,
I will truly accept your wisdom here, but, this MSI card just would not
re-boot w/o a nag msg about its' missing HD Audio Driver! Even after
upgrading to WinXPpro! I'm not certain what stopped the nag msgs ATM. It
was
JB,
OK, on the next nag msg, I will install it to get rid of the yellow other
devices object in the CP/DM.
Yes, I comprehend the HDMI interface. I have seen it on many of the higher
level video cards.
The 4350 does not have one. It has a VGA interface and a DVI inteface, the
4670 just has 2
On 5 Dec 2008, at 19:16, DHSinclair wrote:
JB,
OK, on the next nag msg, I will install it to get rid of the yellow
other devices object in the CP/DM.
Yes, I comprehend the HDMI interface. I have seen it on many of the
higher level video cards.
The 4350 does not have one. It has a VGA
DVI-HDMI adapter is precisely what comes bundled with ATI cards and the HQ audio
driver can safely be disabled is not using HDMI. Of the 2 brands of 3870x2's I went
through I also got 2 DVI-VGA 1 Svideo-Component adapters also.
Load the driver, then disable it is what I did.
James Boswell
XML fix is bullshit, I came up with it before it was mainstream and it does nothing
until Windows boots. It's not an acceptable solution as the problem is hardware based
I have posted all over the Sapphire forums months ago. Cards with the issue should be
recalled replaced with reworks ones,
Cost's slightly more for 280 AFAIK, performance goes to ATI unless there's a support
issue with a given game as someone just said.
Jason Carson wrote:
What about the 280? Is it too much money? How does it compare to the 4870?
Well no dual cards means you're not constrained by chipset support of SLI vs.
Crossfire. Not going dual I think is a mistake, and not getting an X2 model a bigger
mistake given how demanding new games like Crysis are. This also leaves an option to
go with a second X2 down the road.
Personally
@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New video card - GTX 260 or HD 4870?
Well no dual cards means you're not constrained by chipset support of SLI vs.
Crossfire. Not going dual I think is a mistake, and not getting an X2 model a
bigger
mistake given how demanding new games like Crysis
Well, Maximum PC and Extreme tech have been giving the 4870 the nod
in the last few months... a better card and cheaper. Particularly
when it comes to video. I think the cooling / noise is more about
the specific manufacture then it is the GPU.
I too have a X1950, although it is AGP. And I
I'd not expect stellar from that card give how old vs. UT3.
RAM drive for TEMP likely counter-productive.
If you upgrade, skip Sapphire next time!
Winterlight wrote:
I just started playing UT3. I am trying to get my video to be more
responsive. I am running a dual Xeon 3.06, 4GB DDR400, and a
Nope, if it's old, it won't do better than that. I originally had a
7800GT (Nvidia) in my system and upgraded to an 8800GT to get decent
response. Note that UT3 is normally frame locked at 60fps (which
makes me laugh at some of the reviews on the web), so unless you
specifically go in and change
At 06:09 AM 8/4/2008, you wrote:
I'd not expect stellar from that card give how old vs. UT3.
Actually, I found a article on how to tweak your ATI card for UT3 or
any other game,
http://www.tweakguides.com/UT3_2.html
mostly explaining what the settings do, ...and after tweaking my
card it
On 4 Aug 2008, at 19:47, Winterlight wrote:
RAM drive for TEMP likely counter-productive.
running from RAM rather then a hard drive counter productive... why?
Because dedicating a chunk like that You're blocking ram that could be
used for caching on an as-need basis.
Infact, it
Winterlight wrote:
At 06:09 AM 8/4/2008, you wrote:
I'd not expect stellar from that card give how old vs. UT3.
Actually, I found a article on how to tweak your ATI card for UT3 or any
other game,
http://www.tweakguides.com/UT3_2.html
mostly explaining what the settings do, ...and
At 12:05 PM 8/4/2008, you wrote:
On 4 Aug 2008, at 19:47, Winterlight wrote:
RAM drive for TEMP likely counter-productive.
running from RAM rather then a hard drive counter productive... why?
Because dedicating a chunk like that You're blocking ram that could be
used for caching on an
Winterlight wrote:
At 12:05 PM 8/4/2008, you wrote:
On 4 Aug 2008, at 19:47, Winterlight wrote:
RAM drive for TEMP likely counter-productive.
running from RAM rather then a hard drive counter productive... why?
Because dedicating a chunk like that You're blocking ram that could be
used
Not true, I have no such folder since I long ago moved pagefile,
%temp% for system users, %userprofile%, and %programfiles% to
different volume from %windir%.
Yeah, well so did I, but Windows, ZoneAlarm, and VMware still put
log files and other files in \windows\temp
Have you set both the system user temp environment variables? They are 2 separate
settings.
Winterlight wrote:
Not true, I have no such folder since I long ago moved pagefile,
%temp% for system users, %userprofile%, and %programfiles% to
different volume from %windir%.
Yeah, well so did
At 02:37 PM 8/4/2008, you wrote:
Have you set both the system user temp environment variables? They
are 2 separate settings.
yep both temp and tmp
Winterlight wrote:
Not true, I have no such folder since I long ago moved pagefile,
%temp% for system users, %userprofile%, and
On Aug 4, 2008, at 5:37 PM, maccrawj wrote:
Have you set both the system user temp environment variables? They
are 2 separate settings.
Not that surprising--a lot of programs are notorious for not using
GetSystemDir, GetTempDir and just assuming the locations are fixed.
Generally
No I mean tmp temp for both SYSTEM USER, the are 2 sets of tmp temp.
Winterlight wrote:
At 02:37 PM 8/4/2008, you wrote:
Have you set both the system user temp environment variables? They
are 2 separate settings.
yep both temp and tmp
Winterlight wrote:
Not true, I have no such
In theory, yes, you should be able to.
In practice, a lot of boards have busted implementations and don't work well
with cards other than graphics. Intel-based boards seem to be the biggest
culprit, but the fact that not all have the issue seems to implicate the
boad manufacturer more than the
it flick back to 8x and stay there.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Sevart
Sent: 09 July 2008 14:02
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Non-video cards in PCIe slot
In theory, yes, you should be able
it do it,
nor what makes it flick back to 8x and stay there.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Sevart
Sent: 09 July 2008 14:02
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Non-video cards in PCIe slot
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian
Weeden
Sent: 09 July 2008 14:27
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Non-video cards in PCIe slot
I have that same board in my main rig - very nice board, like it a lot.
This is going in my HTPC. Currently I have this board:
http
] On Behalf Of Brian Weeden
Sent: 09 July 2008 14:27
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Non-video cards in PCIe slot
I have that same board in my main rig - very nice board, like it a lot.
This is going in my HTPC. Currently I have this board:
http://www.newegg.com
Sounds to me like the TV does not report back it's
video modes correctly or you
are not loading a monitor device driver that reports
them. Any desktop setting
above a display device's detected max gets rendered in
a pan scan view port
the size of the detected max display resolution.
James
The HDTV displays correctly at 1920x1080 with an onboard nVidia card on
another computer. Would that indicate that the HDTV is reporting correctly?
Or is it the HDTV/Video Card combinations? Still doesn't make sense to me
that the ATI card is marketed as an HDTV card capable of 1920x1080 and
Capable I assume is true as long as the display
detects properly.
As to the TV advertising it's capabilities correctly
or not, nvidia vs. ati
detecting better, shades of grey argument if you're
relying on PnP/autodetect
vs. manually loading a driver for the TV.
In Catalyst's display properties
I've dealt with similar issues and found that with many video cards and tv's,
the only way to fix this is spending hours using powerstrip to hand tune and
tweak video card output. Yes, this sucks but is often necessary to get
everything perfect or as close to perfect as the tv and video card
-Original Message-
From: Robert Martin Jr.
I've dealt with similar issues and found that with many video
cards and tv's, the only way to fix this is spending hours
using powerstrip to hand tune and
tweak video card output. Yes, this sucks but is often
necessary to get
So true! Ever since like Catalyst 7.6+ they have been
fracking the AGP users and
to a lesser extent the non-HD series PCIe users!
Still loving my X850XT AGP with older drivers but am
in the process of aquiring
parts for a new Intel system will likely not buy ATI
even if I go X38 chipset.
No
I think you can find an ati 2900 that's agp, I'd have to check.
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
-Original Message-
From: Winterlight [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 17:42:53
To:hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] AGP video upgrade
I am doing a new build on a old box. This
NewEgg ended that paypal offer only hours after it started.
- Original Message -
From: Winterlight [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 7:42 PM
Subject: [H] AGP video upgrade
I am doing a new build on a old box. This PC uses a ATI All in
At 05:44 PM 11/27/2007, you wrote:
I think you can find an ati 2900 that's agp, I'd have to check.
Thing is I am sink of ATI drivers and problems. I have been using ATI
video and TV stuff for about five years now, and I am not happy.
Sent via BlackBerry by ATT
-Original
At 05:52 PM 11/27/2007, you wrote:
NewEgg ended that paypal offer only hours after it started.
Really? I just got the email well, it would of been nice but I
will do the upgrade anyway.
What is the fastest Nivida AGP... a GeForce 7900GS?
7950GT is the fastest AGP I believe. It is made by XFX, but buyer beware
because many of these cards are defective. I had to RMA my card 2 times
before I got one that worked properly. My first card had artifacts and my
second card the DVI
OKay. But, I'm still using AMD TBirds and do not know much about all the new
classes of cpu. And, I thought most of the power for the cpu is derived from
the
regulator circuitry on the mainboard(?) not as direct feed from the psu. All my
current boards have very heavy duty power type
Well maybe. But 150/12 is 12.5AMPS. Now maybe 12.5 amps is a bunch, but
modern day vid cards do need a bunch of trons to work properly and provide
all the eye candy we desire(require). 12.5A is still cake and well within the
bitching limits I remember back in 1997! JMHO.
Best,
Duncan
On Thu,
At 01:51 PM 02/01/2007, dhs wrote:
Well maybe. But 150/12 is 12.5AMPS. Now maybe 12.5 amps is a bunch, but
Don't the X2 CPUs pull around 7.5A on the 12V line? Even if one
factors in the RAM on the video card, 12.5 seems steep to me -
especially since as far as I can tell, most power
Connection to the system power supply is
required: 450-Watt power supply or greater, 30
Amps on 12 volt rail recommended (assumes fully loaded system)
PCI Express compliant power supply required.
Connect directly to the power supply with a 6 pin PCI Express power
connector
For CrossFireT:
150W max still seems like a lot of juice to me.
Greg Sevart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Connection to the system power supply is
required: 450-Watt power supply or greater, 30
Amps on 12 volt rail recommended (assumes fully loaded system)
PCI Express compliant power supply
At 01:01 PM 28/12/2006, Greg Sevart wrote:
No. AMD/ATI is simply recommending that your power supply can provide 30A
-total- on the +12v rail. The card itself pulls much less than that. In
fact, a card with a single PCIe power connector may draw no more than
150W--75W max off PCIe slot
Subject: RE: [H] PCIe video power requirements
150W max still seems like a lot of juice to me.
Chuck, I have both a standalone VCR and one of those copy protected
VCRDVD specialized machines, and in both cases (IIRC) the auto
tracking can be manually over-ridden and set to anything I want...
Another thing to look for is a Manufactures firmware upgrade for the
(VCRDVD) machine. I had to
- Original Message -
From: RLS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'The Hardware List'
hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 12:52 PM
Subject: [H] need video editing software.
The only thing I would really like to change is the removal of about the
you can trim avi's using a null filter in virtual dub (free) and setting
the borders. If the video is currently in MPG format TMPGEnc 3.0 XPress
is what I use but it's not free.
lopaka
RLS wrote:
I have been converting our VHS tapes to video format. I am more that happy
with the main quality
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Christopher Fisk wrote:
I'm looking for a new Video Card for my computer.
Primary use will be to run World of Warcraft at 1280x1024 (My LCD's native
resolution) at the best visual quality. As well as get the best possible
performance out of Oblivion.
I have an Athlon
the 7800GS, which is par...not super.
From: Christopher Fisk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:17:43 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Christopher
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Hayes Elkins wrote:
the 7800GS, which is par...not super.
This is what my research today told me. I ordered one up for $200 because
I don't have the money to upgrade to a PCIe system at this time, but my
6600GT is getting long in tooth.
From the review's I've read
At 11:17 AM 10/18/2006, you wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Christopher
Fisk wrote:
I'm looking for a new Video Card
for my computer.
Primary use will be to run World of Warcraft at 1280x1024 (My LCD's
native resolution) at the best visual quality. As well as get the
best possible performance out of
shorter in the tooth then my fx5900 :-|
fp
At 10:59 AM 10/18/2006, Christopher Fisk Poked the stick with:
This is what my research today told me. I ordered one up for $200 because I
don't have the money to upgrade to a PCIe system at this time, but my 6600GT
is getting long in tooth.
--
2006 20:32:45
To:The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] New Video Card
shorter in the tooth then my fx5900 :-|
fp
At 10:59 AM 10/18/2006, Christopher Fisk Poked the stick with:
This is what my research today told me. I ordered one up for $200 because I
don't have
I understand what you mean but on a long enough time-line you could have
bought one piece @ a time until complete and then put it all together
(I've had an aluminum mid-tower case and PSU for months now sitting in
my closet). But from everything I've read the 7800GS is supposed to be
Why do you think the ATI would be any less stable?
From: Winterlight [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: [H] Which video?
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 19:35:32 -0700
I am putting together(online) a Thinkpad build for my
myself.
From: Winterlight [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: RE: [H] Which video?
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 08:29:43 -0700
At 06:47 AM 9/5/2006, you wrote:
Why do you think the ATI would be any less stable
@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: RE: [H] Which video?
Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 08:45:15 -0700
Since you stated your sister's steepest tasks are looking at high res
images,
I am not sure that a CAT Scan isn't a 3D image. I really don't know, but
that is why I was thinking about the ATI. Personally, I have
I had an MRI done last november. I got my results on a CD that I could view
on any PC.
The ability to manipulate a 2D high res image is what's needed there IMO.
For a LT, a high res screen and some speed (in 2D) would be nice. Think
about what it takes to scroll a zoomed in image around on the
At 12:29 PM 05/09/2006, Winterlight wrote:
At 06:47 AM 9/5/2006, you wrote:
Why do you think the ATI would be any less stable?
Because I own three ATI AIWs, starting with a 7500, and ending with
this 800X. The drivers, for which, are all problematic. I also own,
and have owned, Intel
To:The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: RE: [H] Which video?
Yes, the ATI video card, above 9600 PRO will do two monitors, BUT try it
with another video card, or two more video cards. ATI specifically says
they do not support this. More then that, they cripple their drivers
@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: RE: [H] Which video?
Yes, the ATI video card, above 9600 PRO will do two monitors, BUT try it
with another video card, or two more video cards. ATI specifically says
they do not support this. More then that, they cripple their drivers not to
support
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
