Hello everyone,
I started cruise control (stored in the buildtest module with patch from
issue 995) on the Windows XP and SUSE Linux boxes.
Both machines are identical (1 CPU - P4*3GHz, 1GB RAM, 120Gb HDD).
On each platform cruise control runs (as separate projects in СС terms, all
settings have
On 11/15/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How could there be no limit to stack size??
Limit is there but it's too large, like 2 in power 46.
Is there a way the test framework could set this? Does DRLVM support
-Xss yet?
No, DRLVM doesn't support –Xss flag. …yet.
I
Hey,
Seems like the pretty old problem shows itself again. I'm talking
about SIGUSR2 signal :-(...Classlib's asynchronous signal reporter
uses system semaphores for synchronization purposes...and hysem_wait
is interrupted by the signal:
(gdb) p perror(sym_wait error:)
sym_wait error::
Apparently this is a long awaited working (at least for drlvm
testing), I'll be utterly surprised if somebody objects. Thank you!
Here is My Big +1 :)
15.11.06, Vladimir Ivanov[EMAIL PROTECTED] написал(а):
Hello everyone,
I started cruise control (stored in the buildtest module with patch from
+1
On 11/15/06, Alexey Varlamov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently this is a long awaited working (at least for drlvm
testing), I'll be utterly surprised if somebody objects. Thank you!
Here is My Big +1 :)
15.11.06, Vladimir Ivanov[EMAIL PROTECTED] написал(а):
Hello everyone,
I started
As I understand Alexey means HARMONY-2073, but not HARMONY-2070.
Alexei, is it correct? If not, could you clarify the point about
exn_raise_by_name_internal in your initial letter, please?
Pavel Afremov.
On 11/8/06, Rana Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK thanks Pavel, I'll try the patch
15.11.06, Vladimir Ivanov[EMAIL PROTECTED] написал(а):
Hello everyone,
I started cruise control (stored in the buildtest module with patch from
issue 995) on the Windows XP and SUSE Linux boxes.
Both machines are identical (1 CPU - P4*3GHz, 1GB RAM, 120Gb HDD).
On each platform cruise control
I've found one more issue in the kernel ThreadTest. Filed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2193.
Alexey, please take a look!
On 11/14/06, Alexey Varlamov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2006/11/14, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 13 November 2006 15:51 Elena Semukhina
Mikhail,
Sorry, I'm a bit slow. From my perspective making a documentation
bundle from inter-component interfaces is an excellent idea! I started
collecting interfaces from vm/include directory.
Are there any other bundles a community is interested in? Being closer
to the point, let me ask if
Hi Anton,
I have created HARMONY-2195 for this information.
Thanks,
Sian
On 15/11/06, Anton Luht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Sian,
[skip]
5. Write a tracing aspect (or copy the one attached to
modules\math\src\main\java\org\apache\harmony\tracing)
There was only patch to build.xml
Pavel, you are correct. Rana, sorry for confusion. Both issues block
passing class library unit tests.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2070 [drlvm][thread]
Unhandled exception in java.exe while java.util.jar module tests
execution
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2073
All,
I wonder if we should apply zero regression policy to this change.
Speaking simply, should this patch be reverted and kept for additional
investigation?
On 11/15/06, Alexey Varlamov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The guilty change is the following, which effectively turns on
VM_LAZY_EXCEPTION
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Pavel Afremov wrote:
On 11/13/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the point to have a test which would pass either way? Check
that it doesn't crash the VM, is it the only purpose for it?
I think yes. It should check
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by application-level logging.
Well, I mean the situation when log calls are scattered around the
code. Something like this:
---
void dataExchange() throws Exception {
boolean handshakePerformed = false;
log(in performConnection); // log point 1
...
As part of solution for this issue the
*HARMONY-2197*http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2197 was
created.
I suggest using the separate exclude list for each platform. I hope in this
case the test enabling for the different platforms will be easy. Please,
look at it.
Any comments are
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
The guilty change is the following, which effectively turns on
VM_LAZY_EXCEPTION support in exceptions_impl.cpp:
Well this is a patch from HARMONY-2018 which doesn't hide the fact that
it enables lazy exceptions. Why shouldn't we enable them?
Actually if you revert
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Hello everyone,
I started cruise control (stored in the buildtest module with patch from
issue 995) on the Windows XP and SUSE Linux boxes.
Both machines are identical (1 CPU - P4*3GHz, 1GB RAM, 120Gb HDD).
On each platform cruise control runs (as separate projects in СС
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
Is it possible to configure JIRA to let people to mark issue
attachments as obsolete? Like in Bugzilla?
This is very useful feature when issue has few iterations of the fix.
Trick: upload the file with exactly the same name,
then the latest one will be marked as latest
2006/11/15, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
The guilty change is the following, which effectively turns on
VM_LAZY_EXCEPTION support in exceptions_impl.cpp:
Well this is a patch from HARMONY-2018 which doesn't hide the fact that
it enables lazy exceptions. Why
Hi Alexei,
Yes - it is possible to match those points with aspects
e.g if the class is called MyClass
log point 2 would be matched by call(* MyClass.addSomeDataForServer())
withincode(MyClass.dataExchange())
log point 3 could be matched by call(* MyClass.addMoreSecurity())
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
2006/11/15, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
The guilty change is the following, which effectively turns on
VM_LAZY_EXCEPTION support in exceptions_impl.cpp:
Well this is a patch from HARMONY-2018 which doesn't hide the fact that
it enables
I prefer to name the updated patch some.patch_updated (if the name
of the original patch was some.patch). I am always puzzled when I
see two identical names in attachments.
Thanks,
2006/11/15, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
Is it possible to configure JIRA to let
2006/11/15, Alexey Varlamov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/11/15, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
The guilty change is the following, which effectively turns on
VM_LAZY_EXCEPTION support in exceptions_impl.cpp:
Well this is a patch from HARMONY-2018 which doesn't hide
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
2006/11/15, Alexey Varlamov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/11/15, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
The guilty change is the following, which effectively turns on
VM_LAZY_EXCEPTION support in exceptions_impl.cpp:
Well this is a patch from
15.11.06, Gregory Shimansky[EMAIL PROTECTED] написал(а):
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Hello everyone,
I started cruise control (stored in the buildtest module with patch from
issue 995) on the Windows XP and SUSE Linux boxes.
Both machines are identical (1 CPU - P4*3GHz, 1GB RAM, 120Gb HDD).
On
Alexei Zakharov wrote:
I prefer to name the updated patch some.patch_updated (if the name
of the original patch was some.patch). I am always puzzled when I
see two identical names in attachments.
You can always click on All tab to see not only comments, but status
and field changes, attached
Things become more and more complicated. Can anyone say why we
rejected to use TestSuites for this purpose from the very beginning?
Well, I can't say I am against using xml lists here. But the next step
will be to keep list of individual failing test methods in the xml
file. Then to create
I'm using All issue view. It shows all the comments and attachment
in time ordered way...
This helps. But marking attachments as obsolete will be better :)
SY, Alexey
2006/11/15, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
Is it possible to configure JIRA to let people to mark
2006/11/15, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
2006/11/15, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
The guilty change is the following, which effectively turns on
VM_LAZY_EXCEPTION support in exceptions_impl.cpp:
Well this is a patch from
Hi all,
Among other things listed on the JIT Dev tasks, there is a need for
calling convention (CC) fix-up for IA-32 [1].
Current problems are:
1. The calling convention(s) used are stack-based - this adds a memory
access overhead on calls.
2. The convention currently used for managed code
SUBMISSION TYPE: TSU
SUBMITTED BY: Tim Ellison
SUBMITTED FOR:The Apache Software Foundation
POINT OF CONTACT: Secretary, The Apache Software Foundation
FAX: +1-410-803-2258
MANUFACTURER(S): The Apache Software Foundation, The Legion Of The
Bouncy
Stepan, all,
I've created a JIRA to document the incompatibility of
GapContent.replace().
There are several test cases added, and some of them are indirectly
related to replace(). There's also patch which fixes incompatibilities
of insertString() and remove().
By the way, HARMONY-1753 describes
2006/11/15, Ivanov, Alexey A [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stepan, all,
I've created a JIRA to document the incompatibility of
GapContent.replace().
Great!
What's the number? :)
There are several test cases added, and some of them are indirectly
related to replace(). There's also patch which fixes
Sian January wrote:
I wouldn't necessarily recommend doing a lot of this kind of logging with
aspects as it can make quite a messy aspect and the pointcuts can be quite
fragile (i.e. minor changes in the code can easily cause a pointcut to stop
matching). But it is possible. My second
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Petrenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 5:17 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r472115 -
/incubator/harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/swing/src/main/java/
comm
Sorry, I can't use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail address.
Sorry again, to test it I use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] as for IBM
notifications without ask for permission :(
Could somebody register some fake mail address in the harmony-commits to use
it for my CC notifications or I should use other alias
Elena Semukhina wrote:
I've found one more issue in the kernel ThreadTest. Filed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2193.
Alexey, please take a look!
I am not an Alexey, but I assigned this JIRA to myself. The testcase
seems to be working both on linux and windows, I committed the
Seems, we says about different things :)
First of all, we have no TestNG (or other harness) yet but we need now
different exclude lists for different platforms.
Also, in my vision these exclude-lists are like a buffer before we mark test
by correct tags.
When the test fails on some platform we
Do I understand correctly that per-call-inline-info is a list of inline
chains for every call instruction offset within a code chunk?
If so, think we may replace per-call-inline-info with
per-region-inline-info. Why can't we use per-region-inline-info for stack
tracing.
The other question is:
thx
Tim Ellison wrote:
SUBMISSION TYPE: TSU
SUBMITTED BY: Tim Ellison
SUBMITTED FOR:The Apache Software Foundation
POINT OF CONTACT: Secretary, The Apache Software Foundation
FAX: +1-410-803-2258
MANUFACTURER(S): The Apache Software Foundation, The
Can javac be sustituted by Eclipse compiler as we do for Harmony build?
SY, Alexey
2006/11/15, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Great news everyone, I've finally managed to get Gump running with Harmony.
Find it at (the semipermanent URL of Geir's server)
http://67.86.14.213:1/gump/
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Do we have a solution for that?
Yes, it is a modicum of work for a C-hacker.
It simply requires extending the tools launcher as described earlier
(I'll hunt down the archive if required).
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre,
2006/11/15, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Do we have a solution for that?
Yes, it is a modicum of work for a C-hacker.
It simply requires extending the tools launcher as described earlier
(I'll hunt down the archive if required).
ant runs java compiler without javac
Err, what I found is really trivial bug. But it took quite a few time
to discover - seems today was not my day :(
Index: vm/vmcore/src/exception/exceptions_impl.cpp
===
--- vm/vmcore/src/exception/exceptions_impl.cpp (revision 475132)
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2006/11/15, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Do we have a solution for that?
Yes, it is a modicum of work for a C-hacker.
It simply requires extending the tools launcher as described earlier
(I'll hunt down the archive if required).
ant runs
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
The first problem is the lack of javac that bootstrap-ant requires.
Can you clarify what 'bootstrap-ant' requires? Is it running an Ant
javac task, or compiling Ant source with javac.exe? I was assuming
the latter.
Thanks for getting this going BTW!
Regards,
Tim
--
2006/11/15, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2006/11/15, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Do we have a solution for that?
Yes, it is a modicum of work for a C-hacker.
It simply requires extending the tools launcher as described earlier
(I'll
Pardon for my English - a bit sleepy already...
2006/11/15, Alexey Varlamov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Err, what I found is really trivial bug. But it took quite a few time
to discover - seems today was not my day :(
Index: vm/vmcore/src/exception/exceptions_impl.cpp
Tim Ellison wrote:
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
2006/11/15, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Do we have a solution for that?
Yes, it is a modicum of work for a C-hacker.
It simply requires extending the tools launcher as described earlier
(I'll hunt down the archive if
Oh. It's cool fix for my stupid bug.
Thanks for Alexey very much.
Pavel Afremov.
On 11/15/06, Alexey Varlamov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pardon for my English - a bit sleepy already...
2006/11/15, Alexey Varlamov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Err, what I found is really trivial bug. But it took
Alexey Varlamov wrote:
Err, what I found is really trivial bug. But it took quite a few time
to discover - seems today was not my day :(
Index: vm/vmcore/src/exception/exceptions_impl.cpp
===
---
Guys,
This is a good discussion, and let me praise Alexey for the wonderful fix.
I'm a bit concerned about our accepptance checks. How this could be
that regression was missed by a committer and an engineer durring
acceptance test runs?
Bug comments showed that Gregory ran the tests before a
w00t!
(the server has been heating my office... I can tell when Gump is
running as the fans spin up...)
geir
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Great news everyone, I've finally managed to get Gump running with Harmony.
Find it at (the semipermanent URL of Geir's server)
Yep!
Will enable the notications...
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Hello everyone,
I started cruise control (stored in the buildtest module with patch from
issue 995) on the Windows XP and SUSE Linux boxes.
Both machines are identical (1 CPU - P4*3GHz, 1GB RAM, 120Gb HDD).
On each platform cruise
I've allowed the mail through..
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Hello everyone,
I started cruise control (stored in the buildtest module with patch from
issue 995) on the Windows XP and SUSE Linux boxes.
Both machines are identical (1 CPU - P4*3GHz, 1GB RAM, 120Gb HDD).
On each platform cruise control
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
Guys,
This is a good discussion, and let me praise Alexey for the wonderful fix.
I'm a bit concerned about our accepptance checks. How this could be
that regression was missed by a committer and an engineer durring
acceptance test runs?
Bug comments showed that Gregory
Tim Ellison wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
The first problem is the lack of javac that bootstrap-ant requires.
Can you clarify what 'bootstrap-ant' requires? Is it running an Ant
javac task, or compiling Ant source with javac.exe? I was assuming
the latter.
bootstrap-ant is a script
On 11/13/06, Pavel Afremov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I think that Stack test should print pass if no stack overflow error is
happened.
Test should check processing of this error but not existing of it.
I think that this makes sense. StackTest should be intended to detect
correct
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
The first problem is the lack of javac that bootstrap-ant requires.
Can you clarify what 'bootstrap-ant' requires? Is it running an Ant
javac task, or compiling Ant source with javac.exe? I was assuming
the latter.
Rana Dasgupta wrote:
I think that a problem with the junit tests is that some failures spit out
to the console, but show up in the test run results as passed. I find this
very confusing. So unless you are watching all the time, you can miss them.
We can't depend on this - they have to
I wonder if there is any harm in deleting them?
geir
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
I'm using All issue view. It shows all the comments and attachment
in time ordered way...
This helps. But marking attachments as obsolete will be better :)
SY, Alexey
2006/11/15, Salikh Zakirov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I like this approach.
+1
(it's exactly how I would have done it. :)
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
As part of solution for this issue the
*HARMONY-2197*http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2197 was
created.
I suggest using the separate exclude list for each platform. I hope in this
case the
We should also take a hard look at how to do this in DRLVM as well...
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Seems, we says about different things :)
First of all, we have no TestNG (or other harness) yet but we need now
different exclude lists for different platforms.
Also, in my vision these exclude-lists
Copying Harmony as some of the Eclipse folks might be watching...
Stuart Ballard wrote:
This sounds like a bug in your compiler. The JLS specifies that every
constructor of every nonstatic inner class should be compiled as if it
has an extra parameter of the type of the outer class, to hold
I have forwarded this message to a member of the compiler team.
Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/15/2006 03:02 PM
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
Stuart Ballard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED], harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject
Re: [Japi]
On 11/15/06, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What compiler is producing the jar that you're running this against?
Eclipse ECJ 3.2
/me wonders if later versions have fixed this problem
Also, is BasicSwingTestCase public in the first place?
checking... yeah it's a 'public
Pascal Rapicault wrote:
I have forwarded this message to a member of the compiler team.
Pascal, thanks!
Let us know what they say.
*Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED]*
11/15/2006 03:02 PM
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
Stuart Ballard [EMAIL
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 19:27 Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Great news everyone, I've finally managed to get Gump running with Harmony.
Find it at (the semipermanent URL of Geir's server)
http://67.86.14.213:1/gump/
and the 'list of todos' with importance priority can be found at
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 19:27 Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Great news everyone, I've finally managed to get Gump running with Harmony.
Find it at (the semipermanent URL of Geir's server)
http://67.86.14.213:1/gump/
and the 'list of todos' with importance
Sam Ruby wrote:
Tim Ellison wrote:
If Ant depends upon the non-API com.sun packages in tools.jar then I
guess we can decide to create an adapter in the suncompat module.
The compiler is pluggable in Ant, look for the build.compiler option:
Understood, in fact we do that for the Harmony
Great news everyone, I've finally managed to get Gump running with Harmony.
Find it at (the semipermanent URL of Geir's server)
http://67.86.14.213:1/gump/
and the 'list of todos' with importance priority can be found at
http://67.86.14.213:1/gump/project_todos.html
The first
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
So, if you are curious to see what's the next roadblock, I suggest that
one of you starts coding a javac wrapper for ecj (or anything else that
would do the job, I don't care) ;-)
We have one somewhere...
See
That's odd. The launcher should figure this out. I'll take a look in a
sec...
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 19:27 Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Great news everyone, I've finally managed to get Gump running with Harmony.
Find it at (the
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I thought we had it configured that when a JIRA is modified, the
reporter is notified directly... I'm not sure that really helps though.
I wonder if we should just open things up a bit and let any user modify
a JIRA and see what happens.
+1 Provided we don't
Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
As part of solution for this issue the
*HARMONY-2197*http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2197 was
created.
I suggest using the separate exclude list for each platform. I hope in this
case the test enabling for the different platforms will be easy. Please,
Rana Dasgupta wrote:
I think that a problem with the junit tests is that some failures spit out
to the console, but show up in the test run results as passed. I find this
very confusing. So unless you are watching all the time, you can miss them.
Hmm, this doesn't sound right. I've not seen
Tim Ellison wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I thought we had it configured that when a JIRA is modified, the
reporter is notified directly... I'm not sure that really helps though.
I wonder if we should just open things up a bit and let any user modify
a JIRA and see what happens.
+1
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Pavel Afremov wrote:
On 11/13/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the point to have a test which would pass either way? Check
that it doesn't crash the VM, is it the only purpose for it?
I
um... classlib uses SIGUSR2 as well? Doesn't our thread manager use it?
Evgueni Brevnov wrote:
Hey,
Seems like the pretty old problem shows itself again. I'm talking
about SIGUSR2 signal :-(...Classlib's asynchronous signal reporter
uses system semaphores for synchronization purposes...and
Egor Pasko wrote:
On the 0x222 day of Apache Harmony Geir Magnusson, Jr. wrote:
I thought we had it configured that when a JIRA is modified, the
reporter is notified directly... I'm not sure that really helps
though. I wonder if we should just open things up a bit and let any
user modify a
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Pavel Afremov wrote:
On 11/13/06, Gregory Shimansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what is the point to have a test which would pass either way?
Check
that it doesn't crash the VM, is
Pavel Afremov wrote:
On 11/15/06, *Geir Magnusson Jr.* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How could there be no limit to stack size??
Limit is there but it's too large, like 2 in power 46.
Is there a way the test framework could set this? Does DRLVM support
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
-Xss is the lower stack limit, it doesn't specify the maximum stack
size, doesn't it?
What does lower stack limit mean? :) I think that it's the size of
the stack, max.
I thought it is a starting stack
maybe we should put this in our regular NOTICE file?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: tellison
Date: Wed Nov 15 14:11:04 2006
New Revision: 475458
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475458
Log:
Add readme with explanation of bis export file.
Added:
I still think that this is bogus
What if SOE machinery is broken?
We need to make this a predictable test.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gshimansky
Date: Wed Nov 15 14:38:55 2006
New Revision: 475473
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=475473
Log:
Allow the test to pass even
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit tests
pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great team we
are. Thanks for your thoughtful, diligent work and deep inspiration. Kudos
to you for the following (and not limited to this):
* Alexey Varlamov
Oops, I've missed:
* Andrew Zhang for reviewing class library patches and helpful discussions
On 11/16/06, Alexei Fedotov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit tests
pass on DRLVM. Thank you all! It takes 44 days for the great
Alexei Fedotov wrote:
Folks,
According to http://harmonytest.org, today 100% of class library unit tests
pass on DRLVM.
Yay!
There are still open issues with reliability, multiprocessor and other
special configurations, so the page
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unit_Tests_Pass_on_DRLVM
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I've tried to run the VM launcher and I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~/src/harmony/drlvm/build/lnx_em64t_gcc_debug/deploy/jre/bin $ ./java
Harmony Java launcher
Apache Harmony Launcher : (c)
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I still think that this is bogus
What if SOE machinery is broken?
We need to make this a predictable test.
Well I don't feel strongly to either side. We can use ulimit -s in
build.sh script which runs tests (maybe only in case it
Be sure to not miss anyone :) This was a great community effort, with
everyone pitching in.
DRLVM is now a full peer to J9 in Harmony testing. :) We still need
to use J9 (and another VM that happens to work with our classlibrary),
as a sanity check, but we should from now on use DRLVM in
There is something that I am missing here. For example on my Linux build,
running kernel tests with .jet, I see some java.lang tests failures eg.,
SystemExtensionTest fails for me, and in the console summary report I get
Kernel tests failed using Jitrino.Jet blah blah, but when I go browse
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I still think that this is bogus
What if SOE machinery is broken?
We need to make this a predictable test.
Well I don't feel strongly to either side. We can use ulimit -s in
build.sh script which runs
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 02:28 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think I said I was going to look at it...
An FYI - it's demotivating for people that say they'll do something to
have someone else race and beat them to it...
I'm not mad, but wanted to let you know.
I
sorry
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 02:28 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think I said I was going to look at it...
An FYI - it's demotivating for people that say they'll do something to
have someone else race and beat them to it...
I'm not mad, but wanted to let you
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I still think that this is bogus
What if SOE machinery is broken?
We need to make this a predictable test.
Well I don't feel strongly to either side. We can use ulimit -s in
My bad. Sorry again. Please ignore.
geir
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
sorry
Gregory Shimansky wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 02:28 Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I think I said I was going to look at it...
An FYI - it's demotivating for people that say they'll do something to
have someone
On 11/13/06, Mikhail Loenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess that Sun has implemented some behavior and some exception
could be thrown by that implementation.
Sorry for my late reply... Just back from travelling. :)
I don't quite get the point. What does that implementation mean? Is it
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
Salikh Zakirov wrote:
I think you have missed one point: after retracing from secondary root
set once,
more classloaders may be found reachable, so this step needs to be
repeated until
convergence (to obtain the closure of reachability with additional
links Object-Class,
Hi All,
Currently Harmony has pack all its source files into jars and put
them in deploy\jdk\jre\lib\boot, e.g, luni-src.jar, nio-src.jar, etc(I
don't know when this happens, however they are here now).
In most cases it does not disturb any one. However when I fix
something in a
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
